Re: Why is there a conflict?

2021-01-18 Thread Werner Koch via Gnupg-users
On Fri, 15 Jan 2021 15:43, Ayoub Misherghi said:

> a@b:c$ gpg -s -e -b -r Mike data.file
>
> gpg: conflicting commands

You can use the combined method of signing (-s) and encryption (-e) with
a detached signatures (-b).


Salam-Shalom,

   Werner

-- 
Die Gedanken sind frei.  Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

Re: Why is there a conflict?

2021-01-17 Thread bereska--- via Gnupg-users
"a@b:c$ gpg -e -b -r Mike data.file" produces the encrypted file 
data.file.sig with the detached signature of data.file

I don't think there's a oneliner for what you're trying to achieve

gpg -er Mike data.file
gpg -b data.file.gpg


17.01.2021 00:56, Ayoub Misherghi via Gnupg-users пишет:


a@b:c$ gpg -e -b -r Mike data.file


produced "data.file.sig" and no "data.file.gpg"


Thanks,


Ayoub



On 1/16/2021 2:53 AM, Dmitry Gudkov wrote:

Just get rid of -s

On Jan 16, 2021 12:35, Ayoub Misherghi via Gnupg-users 
 wrote:



The intention is to sign and encrypt "data.file" producing a detached 
signature file.



a@b:c$ gpg -s -e -b -r Mike data.file

gpg: conflicting commands


Why is there a conflict? I do not want to produce an attached signature.


Ayoub



___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

Re: Why is there a conflict?

2021-01-17 Thread Ayoub Misherghi via Gnupg-users

  
  


On 1/16/2021 3:18 AM, Stefan Claas
  wrote:


  On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 11:57 AM Stefan Claas
 wrote:

  

On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 11:34 AM Ayoub Misherghi via Gnupg-users
 wrote:


  

The intention is to sign and encrypt "data.file" producing a detached signature file.


a@b:c$ gpg -s -e -b -r Mike data.file

gpg: conflicting commands


Why is there a conflict? I do not want to produce an attached signature.



You use -s and -b, try 'gpg -a -b -e file'

  
  
You can shorten this like: 'gpg -aber Mike data.file' (cool German
word 'aber' :-)

Regards
Stefan

gpg -aber data.file
produced "data.file.asc" and no "data.file.sig"


Danke,


Ayoub





  


___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

Re: Why is there a conflict?

2021-01-17 Thread Ayoub Misherghi via Gnupg-users

  
  
a@b:c$ gpg -e -b -r Mike data.file


produced "data.file.sig" and no "data.file.gpg"


Thanks,


Ayoub





On 1/16/2021 2:53 AM, Dmitry Gudkov
  wrote:


  
  
  
  Just get rid of -s
  
On Jan 16, 2021 12:35, Ayoub Misherghi
  via Gnupg-users  wrote:

  
  


The intention is to sign and encrypt "data.file" producing a
  detached signature file.


a@b:c$ gpg -s -e -b -r Mike data.file
gpg: conflicting commands


Why is there a conflict? I do not want to produce an attached
  signature.



Ayoub

  

  


___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

Re: Why is there a conflict?

2021-01-16 Thread Stefan Claas via Gnupg-users
On Sun, Jan 17, 2021 at 12:10 AM Ayoub Misherghi  wrote:
>
>
> On 1/16/2021 3:18 AM, Stefan Claas wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 11:57 AM Stefan Claas
>  wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 11:34 AM Ayoub Misherghi via Gnupg-users
>  wrote:
>
> The intention is to sign and encrypt "data.file" producing a detached 
> signature file.
>
>
> a@b:c$ gpg -s -e -b -r Mike data.file
>
> gpg: conflicting commands
>
>
> Why is there a conflict? I do not want to produce an attached signature.
>
> You use -s and -b, try 'gpg -a -b -e file'
>
> You can shorten this like: 'gpg -aber Mike data.file' (cool German
> word 'aber' :-)
>
> Regards
> Stefan
>
> gpg -aber data.file
>
> produced "data.file.asc" and no "data.file.sig"
>
>
> Danke,

Gern geschehen (you're welcome)!

Try to omit the 'a' and see if you then get the .sig file.
(I am a bit out of the loop regarding gpg)

Regards
Stefan

___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Re: Why is there a conflict?

2021-01-16 Thread Dmitry Gudkov via Gnupg-users
Just get rid of -s

On Jan 16, 2021 12:35, Ayoub Misherghi via Gnupg-users  
wrote:


The intention is to sign and encrypt "data.file" producing a detached signature 
file.


a@b:c$ gpg -s -e -b -r Mike data.file

gpg: conflicting commands


Why is there a conflict? I do not want to produce an attached signature.


Ayoub
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

Re: Why is there a conflict?

2021-01-16 Thread Stefan Claas via Gnupg-users
On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 11:57 AM Stefan Claas
 wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 11:34 AM Ayoub Misherghi via Gnupg-users
>  wrote:
> >
> >
> > The intention is to sign and encrypt "data.file" producing a detached 
> > signature file.
> >
> >
> > a@b:c$ gpg -s -e -b -r Mike data.file
> >
> > gpg: conflicting commands
> >
> >
> > Why is there a conflict? I do not want to produce an attached signature.
>
> You use -s and -b, try 'gpg -a -b -e file'

You can shorten this like: 'gpg -aber Mike data.file' (cool German
word 'aber' :-)

Regards
Stefan

___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Re: Why is there a conflict?

2021-01-16 Thread Stefan Claas via Gnupg-users
On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 11:34 AM Ayoub Misherghi via Gnupg-users
 wrote:
>
>
> The intention is to sign and encrypt "data.file" producing a detached 
> signature file.
>
>
> a@b:c$ gpg -s -e -b -r Mike data.file
>
> gpg: conflicting commands
>
>
> Why is there a conflict? I do not want to produce an attached signature.

You use -s and -b, try 'gpg -a -b -e file'

Regards
Stefan

___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users