I'll take these tarballs, upload to usual places and make an announcement
likely tomorrow. Consider the tarballs final, even if I didn't upload them
into usual places yet. Git tags are already pushed.
sent from phone
On Sun 2 May 2021, 15:23 Gregory Casamento,
wrote:
> I did a build as well and ran the tests. Seems fine.
>
> GC
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 11:25 AM Riccardo Mottola <
> riccardo.mott...@libero.it> wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> I did a build ot base/gui/back on linux/amd64 gcc and found no issues.
>> Maybe this is enough to tell that the packages are complete. Didn't test
>> for bugs on all platforms to know if you caught a good git version or not.
>>
>> Riccardo
>>
>> Ivan Vučica wrote:
>> > (This is not a release announcement)
>> >
>> > A signed build of gnustep-gui / gnustep-back 0.29.0 has been uploaded
>> > at http://badc0de.net/gs/2021.
>> >
>> > Actual final releases will, as always, be distributed via GNUstep FTP.
>> > Please give this test build a go.
>> >
>> > ===
>> >
>> > Psst! If you are using themes such as Rik, you might need to rebuild
>> > them, even if there were no code changes. This is usually the case, I
>> > suspect, as well; but today I was bit by it for the first time. It was
>> > curious as I only saw problems on applications I rebuilt -- which in
>> > retrospect makes sense, given the SO bump.
>> >
>> > ===
>> >
>> > Now that all four libs are prepared, I will give it a few days to
>> > receive a stop signal, or an actively-green-light from maintainers.
>> > Then I will send out announcement emails, create GitHub releases, etc.
>> >
>> > Of course, if you spot a small thing that we _can_ fix post release
>> > (i.e. not a full showstopper), I will be happy to cut a smaller
>> > point-release.
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 10:34 PM Ivan Vučica wrote:
>> >> (This is not a release announcement)
>> >>
>> >> A signed build of gnustep-base 1.28.0 has been uploaded at
>> >> http://badc0de.net/gs/2021.
>> >>
>> >> Actual final releases will, as always, be distributed via GNUstep FTP.
>> >> Please give this test build a go.
>> >>
>> >> I will continue preparing gnustep-gui and gnustep-back.
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 8:12 PM Ivan Vučica wrote:
>> >>> I am resuming work on releases today and hope to prepare at least
>> >>> -base tarball today.
>> >>>
>> >>> On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 11:43 AM Frederik Seiffert
>> >>> wrote:
>>
>> Am 22.03.2021 um 19:03 schrieb Richard Frith-Macdonald <
>> rich...@frithmacdonald.me.uk>:
>>
>> IIRC the standard/historic behavior is that an object can retain
>> itself in the -dealloc method, to extend its own lifetime, and I guess that
>> the singletons do that (I haven't checked).
>> I think that behavior changed for ARC, so it could be that the
>> runtime is performing an ARC style deallocation when it should be calling
>> NSDeallocateObject() (or something odd is going on in the
>> NSDeallocateObject() function).
>>
>>
>> I’ve pushed a change in the following PR that fixes the test failure:
>>
>> https://github.com/gnustep/libs-base/pull/177/commits/e1e661286a6b9d717dc0312bed5f8b4b5e549d6f
>>
>> Frederik
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> Gregory Casamento
> GNUstep Lead Developer / OLC, Principal Consultant
> http://www.gnustep.org - http://heronsperch.blogspot.com
> https://www.patreon.com/bePatron?u=352392 - Become a Patron
> https://gf.me/u/x8m3sx - My GNUstep GoFundMe
> https://teespring.com/stores/gnustep - Store
>
