Re: [Goanet] Why What's Good for India Is Good for the US

2006-01-17 Thread Mervyn Lobo
---
| New on Goanet's website's Aamp;E section - http://www.goanet.org 
  |
|   Book in Review: A Kind of Absence - Joao da Veiga Coutinho|
| POEM: SUSEGAAD - Cynthia Gomes James|
| 
http://www.goanet.org/modules.php?op=modloadamp;name=Newsamp;file=articleamp;sid=216
 |
---
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
by Charles Wheelan, Ph.D. 
 Do you remember the crap that Detroit
 produced before Honda  and Toyota 
 became serious players in the American market?
 (True, Detroit still  produces a 
 shocking amount of crap, but now we don't have to
 buy it, as GM  shareholders and bondholders have
learned.) 

 The first is energy. On the fossil fuel front, the
whole 
 world is locked in a zero-sum game. Every newly 
 prosperous high-tech worker in 
 Bangalore (or Beijing or Bangkok) wants a car or  at
 least a two wheeler. 

Folks,
Looking at this from the view point of an investor, I
would long oil stocks and short GM. Then again, that's
what the smart people have been doing for the past two
years.

Also, as Indians get more dollars, dollars that are
depreciating in value, they will use the method they
traditionally use to store value i.e. they will invest
in gold.

Someone correct me if I am wrong but when you sell US
dollars and buy gold, that cannot be good for the US
economy.

Mervyn3.0











__ 
Find your next car at http://autos.yahoo.ca



[Goanet] Why What's Good for India Is Good for the US

2006-01-16 Thread VABaliga
---
| New on Goanet's website's Aamp;E section - http://www.goanet.org 
  |
|   Book in Review: A Kind of Absence - Joao da Veiga Coutinho|
| POEM: SUSEGAAD - Cynthia Gomes James|
| 
http://www.goanet.org/modules.php?op=modloadamp;name=Newsamp;file=articleamp;sid=216
 |
---


by Charles Wheelan, Ph.D. Wednesday, 
January 4, 2006  I spent 
two weeks last month in India, one of the most fascinating places on the planet. 
Where else can you stroll through the gleaming high-tech Bangalore campus of 
Infosys only hours after getting stuck in a traffic jam on a major highway 
caused by a collision between a tractor and an ox cart?  So far, India has attracted mainstream 
attention mostly as the place where the guy booking your airline ticket -- or 
transcribing your medical records or even preparing your taxes -- happens to be 
sitting. That's true enough. But India is far more than a telemarketing 
curiosity, and "outsourcing" is only a tiny piece of the economic transformation 
going on there.  Having 
grown at roughly 6 percent a year for the past decade with the potential to do 
even better, India is likely to be one of the most important economic stories of 
the next decade.  America 
has a huge stake in that success -- even as some jobs migrate across the Indian 
Ocean. Indeed, here are four reasons we should hope that the next decade in 
India is at least as good as the last decade has been.  1. Because it's the world's largest 
democracy. If we're going to promote democracy 
around the globe, particularly as a solution for what ails the Middle East, then 
we ought to wish success upon the world's largest and most vibrant democracy. 
India has a billion people, 22 official languages, and so many ethnicities that 
everyone is a minority. If democracy can work here, it can work anywhere. 
And it is working. Indians vote in far higher numbers than 
Americans, even when it means trekking for hours to the closest polling place. 
India's government is plodding, fractious, and permeated by corruption. But it 
has also brought stability, the rule of law, and respect for individual rights 
to a place that looks ungovernable on the surface. And did I mention that India 
has the world's third largest Muslim population?  2. Because it's where a large 
proportion of the world's poor live. If you don't 
care about starving people, then skip to number three. If you do, then India 
matters a lot. It's just basic math; roughly a third of 
the world's poor live in India. Robust economic growth will help these people 
far more than any check you might mail to one of those places that sends you 
free return address labels. It's already started. 
India's growth over the past several decades has lifted some 100 million people 
out of dire poverty.  3. 
Because a richer India will make for a richer America. How can a place that "competes" with American companies and replaces 
American workers make us better off by growing wealthier? First, a growing Indian middle class will buy our products. The 
guy in Bangalore who answers questions about your Dell computer probably drinks 
Coke, uses Microsoft Word, and reads my column on Yahoo! Finance. (Okay, I can't 
prove that last one, but you get the point.) It doesn't matter what business 
you're in, having 300 million new middle class consumers in India is good for 
you. Second, Indian firms will design and sell 
products that make our lives better. That's what happens when you unleash new 
human potential. Imagine the following scenario: Your child has just been 
diagnosed with a rare form of leukemia. The doctor sits you down and says, "I 
have good news and bad news. The good news is that the disease can now be 
treated successfully. The bad news is that the treatment was discovered by an 
Indian scientist, and the drugs are produced by a leading Indian pharmaceutical 
company." Actually, that's not really bad news, is it? Third, at a minimum, Indian competition and outsourcing by 
American companies will lower the cost and improve the quality of all kinds of 
goods and services. Do you remember the crap that Detroit produced before Honda 
and Toyota became serious players in the American market? (True, Detroit still 
produces a shocking amount of crap, but now we don't have to buy it, as GM 
shareholders and bondholders have learned.) Cheaper 
imports from places like India or China are just like a tax cut; there is more 
money left in your wallet at the end of the month. And they create American 
jobs, too, which is less intuitive and therefore often overlooked. If you save 
money on cheaper cotton towels, much of that extra cash is likely to be spent on 
American goods and services. A Canadian trade minister made this point to me 
once when he asked