Re: [Goanet] Section 377/reply to Kevin

2006-10-02 Thread Chris Vaz
Verrry interesting  to know that homosexuals can produce progeny... so 
they can raise THEIR children!

Cheers!
Chris


- Original Message - 
From: Santosh Helekar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Goa's premiere mailing list, estb. 1994! goanet@lists.goanet.org
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2006 3:56 PM
Subject: Re: [Goanet] Section 377/reply to Kevin


 
 * G * O * A * N * E * T  C * L * A * S * S * I * F * I * E * D * S *
 
 Enjoy your holiday in Goa. Stay at THE GARCA BRANCA from November to May
 There is no better, value for money, guest house.
  Confirm your bookings early or miss-out

  Visit http://www.garcabranca.com for details/booking/confirmation.
 
 The question is, would you want to enact laws that
 prevent homosexual parents or single parents from
 raising children in their households?

 Cheers,

 Santosh

 --- Carvalho [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

My bias in this lies from the point of the child. A
parent has to nurture a child not just through
infancy but through adolescence and adulthood. The
two genders in a traditional family each bring
distinct dimensions into play. As an adult who is
still very much a child to my parents, I relish the
masculinity and femininity of my family. There are
facets to my father which my mother could never
emulate and vice versa. Every child has much to gain
from the duality of the male and the female personae.

 Anyway, that's my two cents and it's probably worth
 even less :))

 selma
 ___
 Goanet mailing list
 Goanet@lists.goanet.org
 http://lists.goanet.org/listinfo.cgi/goanet-goanet.org 

___
Goanet mailing list
Goanet@lists.goanet.org
http://lists.goanet.org/listinfo.cgi/goanet-goanet.org


Re: [Goanet] Section 377/reply to Kevin

2006-10-01 Thread Santosh Helekar

* G * O * A * N * E * T  C * L * A * S * S * I * F * I * E * D * S *

Enjoy your holiday in Goa. Stay at THE GARCA BRANCA from November to May
 There is no better, value for money, guest house.
  Confirm your bookings early or miss-out

  Visit http://www.garcabranca.com for details/booking/confirmation.

The question is, would you want to enact laws that
prevent homosexual parents or single parents from
raising children in their households?

Cheers,

Santosh

--- Carvalho [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
My bias in this lies from the point of the child. A
parent has to nurture a child not just through
infancy but through adolescence and adulthood. The
two genders in a traditional family each bring
distinct dimensions into play. As an adult who is
still very much a child to my parents, I relish the
masculinity and femininity of my family. There are
facets to my father which my mother could never
emulate and vice versa. Every child has much to gain
from the duality of the male and the female personae.
 
 Anyway, that's my two cents and it's probably worth
 even less :))
 
 selma
___
Goanet mailing list
Goanet@lists.goanet.org
http://lists.goanet.org/listinfo.cgi/goanet-goanet.org


Re: [Goanet] Section 377/reply to Kevin

2006-10-01 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dear Selma,

Your two cents are worth much more than you think on this forum.  The fact
that you struggle with these decisions makes you more human than those
pious souls who have all the answers in black or white.  As we evolve, our
opinions shift based on the knowledge we gain from experience and learning.
Those who choose to refer to 2000 year old books for all their answers will
either go to heaven or go extinct.  (More on the death penalty later.)

I, too, used to think that a child needed the mother and father role models
to develop into a healthy adult but after witnessing the interactions
within TWO same sex families, I  have changed that opinion. I was genuinely
amazed at how the male same-sex couple I know, with an adopted daughter,
each modelled a different gender consistently.  One of them
was a typical 'mother-hen'  making sure the daughter was dressed
correctly, picking her up from school, helping her with teenage problems
etc. while the other partner was more the 'Dad role' stricter with the
discipline and made most of the decisions for the family, although 'Mom'
did the finances.  Granted, this is a personal observation but it changed
my preconceptions of the family dynamics within a same-sex family.

The roles were not as defined in the lesbian couple who had a daughter from
a previous marriage of one of the partners. Both were 'Moms' although just
from their interaction there was a definite difference in their
personalities, one being quite decisive when it came to financial
decisions, the other deferring to her and even asking every time a
financial question came up. Both these couples are clients of mine.  Aside
from their parenting skills, gay couples make the best pet owners!  They
can empathize with their pets and project their maternal/paternal instincts
onto their 'surrogate children' to follow all recommendations to keep them
healthy.

I think that mankind is generally an empathic being which is the basis for
universal morality and necessary for social living and survival.  However,
there are deranged
individuals who are loners and can survive in isolation but that is the
exception. Similarly, there are exceptions wherin the ability to empathize
has never developed either due to a physical injury, a chemical imbalance
or a socializing problem as the child grew into an adolescent and
eventually an adult who had no way of feeling his/her victim's suffering
(whether physical or emotional).  This has been studied in children who
have fun pulling wings off or burning insects, grow into younsters who poke
pencils into caged rodents and eventually have no qualms about setting a
kitten on fire.

In cases where these deranged individuals are a consistent danger to
society, they need to be restricted - life time prison terms with programs
to make them earn their keep as there would be no hope of rehabilitation. 
In other cases of 'crimes of passion' it has been well documented that
emotions can run so strong as to overcome those natural inhibitions to
commit serious injury and even death in some cases. However, do they
deserve the 'eye for an eye' barbaric system of justice? The deterrent
value of capital punishment has been refuted in many studies. It costs
society much more to execute a convicted criminal than to incarcerate
him/her for the rest of their lives. And since, in many cases, it is a
neurological abberation that creates these monsters, are we justified in
killing them to make us feel safer? I think not!

Anyway, that's my $0.02Cdn for now.

Kevin Saldanha
Mississauga, ON.

-
From: Carvalho [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 09:19:39 -0700 (PDT)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], goanet@lists.goanet.org
Subject: Re: [Goanet] Section 377/reply to Kevin

This is one of those issues I struggle with like the death penalty. I can
see both sides of the argument.

Anyway, that's my two cents and it's probably worth even less :))

selma 


mail2web - Check your email from the web at
http://mail2web.com/ .


___
Goanet mailing list
Goanet@lists.goanet.org
http://lists.goanet.org/listinfo.cgi/goanet-goanet.org


Re: [Goanet] Section 377/reply to Kevin

2006-09-28 Thread Carvalho

* G * O * A * N * E * T  C * L * A * S * S * I * F * I * E * D * S *

Enjoy your holiday in Goa. Stay at THE GARCA BRANCA from November to May
 There is no better, value for money, guest house.
  Confirm your bookings early or miss-out

  Visit http://www.garcabranca.com for details/booking/confirmation.

Sheesh Kevin,

While faghag made me sound cool, faghagginess just
makes me sound like an unpalatable Scottish dish. :))
This is one of those issues I struggle with like the
death penalty. I can see both sides of the argument.

Society has experimented with quite a few ways to
raise children. Boarding schools, at one point, were
all the rage to instill discipline and structure into
a child's life. We now know that boarding schools are
not the optimal environment for a child. 

Orphanages, foster homes, single-parent homes,
polygamous environments, communes, all manage to
produce perfectly normal well-adjusted human beings.
Even Romulus raised by wolves turned out pretty ok.
Human are resilient that way. But, we also know these
are not optimal environments for a child. I have no
doubts that gay parents are as good a parent as any
heterosexual parent.

My bias in this lies from the point of the child. A
parent has to nurture a child not just through infancy
but through adolescence and adulthood. The two genders
in a traditional family each bring distinct dimensions
into play. As an adult who is still very much a child
to my parents, I relish the masculinity and femininity
of my family. There are facets to my father which my
mother could never emulate and vice versa. Every child
has much to gain from the duality of the male and the
female personae.

Anyway, that's my two cents and it's probably worth
even less :))

selma
--

--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 Dear Selma,
 
 Your 'faghagginess' will need to be updated to
 include same-sex partners as
 excellent parents to completely normal, well
 adjusted, heterosexual
 children.  In fact, single-parent heterosexuals have
 more trouble raising
 their children, which is obviously not an ideal
 family but becoming more
 prevalent and accepted than same-sex parenting.

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
___
Goanet mailing list
Goanet@lists.goanet.org
http://lists.goanet.org/listinfo.cgi/goanet-goanet.org