[google-appengine] Dashboard IE7 little bug
Hi, I've just noticed that there is a little bug with the dashboard and IE7. By default with IE7, in the Dashboard page : the button 6hr is selected but the chart shows All. It works fine with FF3 i.e. : the button All is selected by default. Regards --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Open Sourcing some Google App Engine Apps
Hi Everyone, Just to let you know I am in the process of open-sourcing a lot of the Apps that I have created. So far I have done - http://www.eweri.com - a url shortening service that gets a lot of use on TweetDeck (http://github.com/PaulKinlan/eweri) - http://www.knowyourprivacy.com - a facebook application to show you the ammount of data you can loose on Facebook ( http://github.com/PaulKinlan/knowyourprivacy) - http://www.thetopicthing.com - a meta search engine ( http://github.com/PaulKinlan/thetopicthing) Hopefully it will help all new Google App Engine Developers and show them what not to do :) I have a couple of others that I can release such as www.twollo.com and some others. I am toying with releasing www.FriendDeck.com, but there are some practical issues that I need to sort out with the CodeSigning and stuff for that to happen. Enjoy. Paul Kinlan --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: cooperate with top Google Apps Engine developer
On Mar 6, 10:18 am, Ben beruss...@gmail.com wrote: On Mar 6, 12:30 am, dalenewman dalenew...@gmail.com wrote: Alex, You should use oDesk (www.odesk.com) for this. One catch though -- you'll have to pay the developers :-) ... if you can call $2/hr getting payed. oDesk is a joke. Indeed! Many clients on those sites seem to expect a miracle for just a few $. The question is what kind of quality you actually get for free, but how can the client judge that if he can't code? :) Could someone please report his experience with App Engine freelancers (or dev companies)? Maybe this is an option for outsourcing the development of some reusable Django apps? Bye, Waldemar Kornewald --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: Datastore errors, timeouts, general difficulties
These may be relevant: http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine/browse_thread/thread/517c7da78454da66/939a67117246d120?lnk=gstq=log+storage#939a67117246d120 http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=452 Basically you need to get the entity before you delete or it will be gone without reducing your storage quota. On Mar 7, 2:58 am, Jonathan Ultis jonathan.ul...@gmail.com wrote: That should read, after deleting, I'm now using 99% of my data storage limit with no additional puts. On Mar 6, 6:00 pm, Jonathan Ultis jonathan.ul...@gmail.com wrote: I created a simple page that simply instantiates and stores a model with about 9 primitive properties. The model is filled with the same data each time, and that data is less than 100 bytes. I don't have indices on any of the properties. I did some load tests, storing approximately half a million of the objects at most. Some of the tests were done during the recent latency problems. Some were done after latency was stabilized. All tests with significant concurrency (50) generated fairly high timeout and quota exceeded error rates. So, I got significant log spew. My total data size should be around 50 megs of real user data. Today, my data usage jumped from about 0.5% of my data storage limit to 67% of my data storage limit without any intervening tests. That was surprising since that's about 10x what I really should be using. But, I figured that data limit might count all replicas or something odd. And, perhaps there's a latency between the data store and the data size calculation. So, I wrote a delete all page that deletes 50 items, then redirects to itself, to delete the next 50. I just delete the first 50 items returned. I'm not paging or anything. The script works locally. I ran that delete page for a while, periodically getting annoying timeouts and quota exceeded. I did not run the page in parallel. Now that I'm using 99% of my data storage limit. I'm afraid I may have to buy data storage before I can delete more items. Any ideas? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Django caching problem.
Hi
I am trying to optimize my app by adding template caching
(http://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/topics/cache/?
from=olddocs#template-fragment-caching)
{% load cache %}
{% cache 3550 news version %}
{% include 'include/articles.html' %}
{% endcache %}
The problem I am facing is that cached part suddenly disappear. I
mean for the first couple of time I refresh the page , it is there ,
but after some time (time vary from 10 sec to 5 min) the cached
fragment is just not there.
Happening both on local and production environment with just slight
difference of frequency (on local environment it is more rare).
first I have tried with standard configuration then I put in
settings :
CACHE_BACKEND = 'locmem:///?timeout=3600'
any clues? is it a bug or is it some appengine limitation ? or I am
just doing something wrong?
django v 1.0.2
appengine sdk 1.1.9
no django helper
regards
Mateusz
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: Query latency is not resolved
Hi, Our apps were pushing GAE limits before quota upgrades (10Mb vs 1Mb). After that we've been able to simplify and speed up applications greatly, with new quotas in mind. And a week ago everything broke (soon after introduction of billing). We've been watching Datastore Query graphs and Serving Fibonacci graphs closely. And even after stabilization, we get 50% of CPU at most, and 20-45% of Datastore Query normal performance. With new limits, we cannot fit into 30sec deadline... Requests that took 12 seconds before, now throw 500 errors after 30second timeout, not talking about 17-22 second ones... Google Engineers know more, but don't share with us. From outside it appears as if some heavy apps launched in production mode on GAE (when additional paid quotas allowed that), and that brought whole GAE infrastructure to knees, exposing bottlenecks, and forcing Google to increase processing power. Regards, m. On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 09:34, Sylvain sylvain.viv...@gmail.com wrote: I've checked the errors in the Dashboard for my app this morning and I've got many Datastore Timeout that didn't occurs last week. So, I think there is still an issue there. Regards On 7 mar, 00:05, Brandon Thomson gra...@gmail.com wrote: For me things like Add a new entity result in timeout errors in the dashboard. On Mar 6, 10:50 am, Sylvain sylvain.viv...@gmail.com wrote: Another thing : even the Dashboard is slower. And since this morning it is more and more slow, particularly when you click on the '+' in the log. On Mar 6, 2:56 pm, Sylvain sylvain.viv...@gmail.com wrote: I agree, the latency is higher than last week before the upgradre. One of my handler is still 1k ms-cpu higher. Regards On Mar 6, 10:45 am, GregF g.fawc...@gmail.com wrote: Don't take my word for it - that was just what I see happening. -- . Myroslav Opyr ▪ CTO ▪Quintagroup ▪ http://quintagroup.com ˙ --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: Latency problem still really a problem
I've got stable performance in my application. It consistently runs 3 to 4 times slower than it used to. Apparently, application performance should improve on Monday but in the mean time performance is quite poor... http://code.google.com/status/appengine On Mar 6, 8:05 pm, cz czer...@gmail.com wrote: Our app is still experiencing at least double the latency as compared to last week and the app is basically unusable. I'm really concerned about this since the GAE team has stated that the latency issue has been resolved. This is so disappointing if the current performance is considered to be fine. I'm really hoping that this isn't the case. I'm curious as to how you are testing latency internally? Perhaps the tests aren't reflecting very well some real world scenarios and that some combination of datastore operations are particularly onerous. In any case, latency is still much much worse than before the server maintenance. P.S. also getting random 502 errors which I assume is related to this issue:http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine/browse_thread/thread/... --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: App Engine geographic distribution
Hi, GAE datacenters are not yet distributed, but will be (or are already with hardware maintenance that took place a week ago) as time goes on. Bear in mind that to commit transaction you'll need extra 50ms to ensure that transaction is committed in all datacenters serving GAE apps worldwide. Regards, m. On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 02:16, Jon McAlister jon...@google.com wrote: I can't comment as to the precise geographic distribution of apps and appservers, but let me put it this way... (a) our datastore API offers transactions (b) a datastore transaction completes in roughly 50ms, sometimes less (c) when routing requests to applications we have no idea which entity groups will be modified by the application when serving that request. further, we don't ask for any hint or indication of this from the application developer. (d) http://www.allthingsdistributed.com/2008/12/eventually_consistent.html Jon On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 2:19 PM, Jeffrey Rosen jef...@gmail.com wrote: I did search. A bump is appropriate for this topic because Google simply hasn't seen it yet. It is a simple yes or no answer and when Google or someone who knows sees it, it will be solved and searchable for future GAE users. On Mar 5, 3:47 am, David Symonds dsymo...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 10:03 AM, Jeffrey Rosen jef...@gmail.com wrote: Bump for Google Please don't. Search the group archives instead. Dave. -- . Myroslav Opyr ▪ CTO ▪Quintagroup ▪ http://quintagroup.com ˙ --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: cooperate with top Google Apps Engine developer
On Mar 6, 4:18 am, Ben beruss...@gmail.com wrote: ... if you can call $2/hr getting payed. oDesk is a joke. Ben. I respectfully disagree with your opinion. I wouldn't write off odesk as a joke. If you get connected with a good partner, you can get guaranteed payments on hourly rates and have the money directly deposited into your banking account. Obviously; don't bid on jobs that pay $2 an hour. You have to wonder what kind of boss only pays $2 an hour :-) Finding the right work and salary can be challenging, but it's worth it to get supplementary income in times like this. Dale www.bookdope.com --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: ValueError: invalid literal for int() with base 10
self.request.get(id) returns a unicode string. You must first make a regular string out of it before casting it to int. photo = Photo.get_by_id(int(str(self.request.get(id 2009/3/1 wsun sunwe...@gmail.com: I upload an image to GAE, *.py: photo = Photo.get_by_id(int(self.request.get(id))) *.html: input type=file name=id id=fileId / then debug: ValueError: invalid literal for int() with base 10: '\xff\xd8\xff\xe0' How can I fix this error? Thank u. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: cooperate with top Google Apps Engine developer
Here here. I can share a funny story I once built a phone system for someone that wanted to set up a 900 number (remember those?) so you can call in and pay two dollars a minute to listen to samples of some New Age music catalog (think Enya or something even more awful). It was quite possibly the stupidest idea I had ever encountered, but the client was blindly unaware of just how much their idea sucked. I remember one of them saying, and this is a direct quote I will remember all the way to the grave, We smell gold here, and we have the right mining equipment. Right. I was just out of college and desperate for cash, so I did the job, but I left a timer in my code so if I didn't call in within 90 days with a secret code to unlock it, it would stop working. Sure enough, the client didn't pay, and right on schedule, I got an angry call from one of them complaining about a database error message, to which I replied that the system appeared to be working perfectly. They went through several more developers, and needless to say, did not go on to build iTunes. So a bit of advice for people here who are thinking of renting themselves out. There are plenty of established companies that are intrigued by cloud computing, have professional management, and the means to pay and pay well to prototype things. If I were building a consulting business that's where I would focus my efforts. The economy may be really bad now, but this is one area where companies can save a lot of money, and the number of people working in this domain is still pretty small. That's where you want to be in a recession, not working on commission for a startup which will more than likely fail (especially in this economy). My two cents... On Mar 5, 2:41 am, Andrew Badera and...@badera.us wrote: *chuckle* So wait, you lack capability, but rather than be forthcoming about your needs, you wish to screen the people volunteering to help you? Sounds like yet another pseudo-entrepreneur who wants to take advantage of techies. On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 5:31 AM, Alex Rad alexra...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Linbo! The questions that it will answer is Where it is and what it is using Google map, reader and google finance. Drop me a few lines about your expereince and I will send out a full description as soon I have read through all the people who has shown their interest. Regards Alex 2009/3/5 lianbo waveconnex...@gmail.com Hi, Alex, What app are you trying to develop? -lb On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 7:47 PM, AlexR alexra...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Everyone, I am not a very good developer, therefore I am looking for some one who can join me to develop an apps. So anyone who enjoy working in team, why not send me an email --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: cooperate with top Google Apps Engine developer
Hi Waldemar, I'm a developer myself and used Elance to hire App Engine Developers due my lack of expirience with Python and tight schedule. A project ($100) was completed on time and I was happy with the work. So I would say it quite possible to find someone for reasonable price and acceptable quality. Here is my orignial feedback with link to profiles of the developers I liked if anyone interested: http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine/browse_thread/thread/6af4a2f60fb95084/227a9f8812a5bca8?lnk=gstq=elance#227a9f8812a5bca8 -- Alex On Mar 7, 1:29 pm, Waldemar Kornewald wkornew...@gmail.com wrote: On Mar 6, 10:18 am, Ben beruss...@gmail.com wrote: On Mar 6, 12:30 am, dalenewman dalenew...@gmail.com wrote: Alex, You should use oDesk (www.odesk.com) for this. One catch though -- you'll have to pay the developers :-) ... if you can call $2/hr getting payed. oDesk is a joke. Indeed! Many clients on those sites seem to expect a miracle for just a few $. The question is what kind of quality you actually get for free, but how can the client judge that if he can't code? :) Could someone please report his experience with App Engine freelancers (or dev companies)? Maybe this is an option for outsourcing the development of some reusable Django apps? Bye, Waldemar Kornewald --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: How to do this?
You can add hidden fields to your form that contain the data from the previous forms. And when the final form is accepted you create the user in the datastore. 2009/3/7 arnie parvez...@rediffmail.com: It is still very confusing as I am not able to point out what to do Let me explain my problem in more detail I have to create a django template based web application that includes a home page with a login section and a new user sign-up link. When a new user visits the sight for the first time then he chooses the new user sign-up link that consissts of there step registration process step1.html step2.html step3.html In step1.html form asks the user for the most basic info like firstname, lastname, address etc. Then step2 and step3.html fiels asks for other related info. My problem is that how should I persist user information across multiple pages. I do not want to store the information in datastore for persisting user information It seems to me that I have to use cookie based sessions but does not get any idea how tostart. Can anybody tell me the steps that i need to use in order to manage data persistency across multiple pages Thanks --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] xml feed into datastore
I'm new to python GAE, so go easy on me :). I'm trying to pull xml data and put it in the datastore. I've created my db.Model class and I've got urlfetch.fetch(url) working to retrieve the xml data. What's the most efficient way of putting the retrieved xml content (it could be JSON if that would help) into the datastore? This is not a one-off data extraction. I have it working currently by parsing using ElementTree.XML and creating a load function on the db.model class which retrieves values from the xml tree, but it seems very manual and difficult to maintain. I can't help but wonder if there's a standard way of tying db.model classes to xml feeds in a more elegant way. Thanks for any help. --Dave --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: Go2 is going to pay the bill. Go2 accepts donation now. Any cooperation is welcome.
AD? I think so. Is the site Go2 doing something like this ?? ''' 4.4. You may not develop multiple Applications to simulate or act as a single Application or otherwise access the Service in a manner intended to avoid incurring fees. ''' I think so. On 3月7日, 下午3时12分, admin go2 go2apps...@gmail.com wrote: Go2 is the second popular app on GAE. Go2 is very fast. Sometimes it is faster than you visiting the website directly. Go2 also supports to sign in lots of web sites, including bebo etc. . There are more than 10,000 visitors from all over the world using Go2 every day. And the number is increasing every day. According to the google's new policy, the free bandwidth of the app will be changed from 20G(10G in and 10G out) to 1G after May 25th, 2009. The extra bandwidth must be purchased. 1G bandwidth is not enough for Go2. We estimate that Go2 will consume more than 100G bandwidth per day after May 25th, 2009. In order to continue providing the Go2's free service to the world, Go2 is going to pay the bill, which is about $360 per month (100G*$0.12/G*30). Now the go2's advertising income is about $120 per month, which is not enough to pay the bill. So please donate to Go2, let Go2 continue providing the excellent service to people all over the world who need it. Any cooperation is also welcome. go2.appspot.com Appendix A. Go2 is the second popular app on GAE. See the report of alexa. The data is at the bottom of the pagehttp://www.alexa.com/data/details/traffic_details/appspot.com. B. Who are using Go2? The top 20 countries or regions are: 1China 2United Kingdom 3United States 4Norway 5Colombia 6Australia 7Canada 8India 9Saudi Arabia 10Hong Kong 11Russia 12Philippines 13Brazil 14Ireland 15Mexico 16Ghana 17Netherlands 18France 19Japan 20Germany (Data from Google Analytics) --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Question: GAE and externally hosted databases
Is it possible to connect to externally hosted databases (eg. mysql running on a server outside of the google network) from an application running on the GAE? I'm currently evaluating GAE for a new web application that I need to develop. I'm not convinced that the datastore is right for my needs, if I could utilise a relational database hosted elsewhere I might be interested. Thanks! --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: Converting model objects to JSON
An example from my last app:
results = []
for app in apps:
results.append({appname : app.appname})
# for JSONP
callback = this.request.get(callback)
this.response.headers[Content-Type] = text/javascript
callback = %s(%s) % (callback, json.write(result))
this.response.out.write(callback)
On Mar 6, 12:28 pm, Devraj Mukherjee dev...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
Quick question about converting model objects in JSON. Have done some
reading and I can't find a way to use simplejson to serialize model
objects because the data types don't support it.
What is the best way to convert a model to json?
Thanks.
--
The secret impresses no-one, the trick you use it for is everything
- Alfred Borden (The Prestiege)
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] BadRequestError: offset may not be above 1000
Hi All, I see this error using this code: query.fetch(1000, offset=1001) --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: Go2 is going to pay the bill. Go2 accepts donation now. Any cooperation is welcome.
$360 ??? :-O On Mar 7, 8:12 am, admin go2 go2apps...@gmail.com wrote: Go2 is the second popular app on GAE. Go2 is very fast. Sometimes it is faster than you visiting the website directly. Go2 also supports to sign in lots of web sites, including bebo etc. . There are more than 10,000 visitors from all over the world using Go2 every day. And the number is increasing every day. According to the google's new policy, the free bandwidth of the app will be changed from 20G(10G in and 10G out) to 1G after May 25th, 2009. The extra bandwidth must be purchased. 1G bandwidth is not enough for Go2. We estimate that Go2 will consume more than 100G bandwidth per day after May 25th, 2009. In order to continue providing the Go2's free service to the world, Go2 is going to pay the bill, which is about $360 per month (100G*$0.12/G*30). Now the go2's advertising income is about $120 per month, which is not enough to pay the bill. So please donate to Go2, let Go2 continue providing the excellent service to people all over the world who need it. Any cooperation is also welcome. go2.appspot.com Appendix A. Go2 is the second popular app on GAE. See the report of alexa. The data is at the bottom of the pagehttp://www.alexa.com/data/details/traffic_details/appspot.com. B. Who are using Go2? The top 20 countries or regions are: 1 China 2 United Kingdom 3 United States 4 Norway 5 Colombia 6 Australia 7 Canada 8 India 9 Saudi Arabia 10 Hong Kong 11 Russia 12 Philippines 13 Brazil 14 Ireland 15 Mexico 16 Ghana 17 Netherlands 18 France 19 Japan 20 Germany (Data from Google Analytics) --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] appspot.com - Traffic Details From Alexa
This site is very useful (but is it reliable?) http://www.alexa.com/data/details/traffic_details/appspot.com --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: Basic Python GSQL Question..
You only create the query you have to execute it to fetch the objects. If you print your object_a variable you will see it is a Query object. # you have to use the same limit number, or leave it out of the query objects = object_a.fetch(200) objects.extend(object_b.fetch(200)) for object in objects: object.something = this It is not good practice to give a variable the name of a known python type (here: list) for object in list: object.something = this 2009/3/7 Draive ashdown...@gmail.com: Hi guys, I'm trying to put together a list of various objects. There are about 5 different classes of objects I need to put in the list then iterate through. It looks like this: class Stuff(db.Model): something= db.StringProperty() class Object_A(Stuff): pass class Object_B(Stuffl): pass object_a = db.GqlQuery(SELECT * FROM GroupA+ ORDER BY timestamp ASC LIMIT 200) object_b = db.GqlQuery(SELECT * FROM GroupB+ ORDER BY timestamp ASC LIMIT 200) Both a and b inherit from the same class and are very similar. What I need is to be able to put these in a list then iterate through the list like... for object in list: object.something = this the problem is that when I try to set something it gives me errors. When however I just do objects a or objects b by themselves its fine. Any pointers on how to create that list? Thanks in advance, -d --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: a fundamental increase in App Engine transparency and locality is needed
Raw data is good - I didn't realise you could click through to the performance graphs on the status page. But currently it only shows the past performance, and leaves us guessing about the future. During the recent issue, I posted a complaint about lack of feedback, and Pete Koomen's response was excellent - he explained what had caused the issue, and more importantly gave us an idea when we could expect some resolution. So if you go down the raw data route, could you also include some indication of when the issue is likely to be resolved. I realise that some issues are much harder to diagnose than others, but if you could have posted a simple Expect 80% recovery in 2 hours with 50% confidence, and 100% recovery on Monday with 100% confidence I'd have been much happier - I could manage customer expectations with confidence. Maybe this could be part of the issue analysis below the status graphs. Start with Expect 100% recovery in 1 hour (or whatever the average is) with 0% confidence and modify the percentage, time and confidence as you learn more - this wouldn't need review/approval. When an issue hits you simply post a link to the issue analysis to the group, and another when it is resolved. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: Query latency is not resolved
On Mar 8, 4:21 am, Myroslav Opyr myros...@quintagroup.com wrote: Google Engineers know more, but don't share with us. From outside it appears as if some heavy apps launched in production mode on GAE (when additional paid quotas allowed that), and that brought whole GAE infrastructure to knees, exposing bottlenecks, and forcing Google to increase processing power. From what Google has said, the issue is due to the hardware upgrade last week, not heavy new apps. They seem confident that it will return to previous performance next Monday evening when they do the second scheduled maintenance. I'm guessing they are changing infrastructure and had to swap out something that is causing all the issues. I wouldn't be surprised if things are actually better than before after Monday. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] FYI: accounting for batch Datastore and Memcache gets/puts.
Just a small note for anyone who might care: memcache.get_multi, memcache.set_multi, db.put, and db.get all appear to count as a single call in quota accounting. This isn't quite clear from the documentation. Additionally, batch DS fetches of 32 entities (by key) is only marginally slower (at 100..199ms) to fetching 16 entities using the same method (70..120ms). A fetch of a single entity is in the range 15..50ms. A conclusion that can be drawn from this is: use batch operations at all costs. If not for the obvious performance gains, then perhaps to save on quota. David. -- It is better to be wrong than to be vague. — Freeman Dyson --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: Go2 is going to pay the bill. Go2 accepts donation now. Any cooperation is welcome.
Andrew Badera: You are right. I should solicit donations on Go2 web, not here. Indeed, I have made a donation page on Go2 website. I just copied it here without modifying. Posting it here , the main idea is I want to find some cooperation here, not donation. We all develop on gae. I think we can find some cooperation to let our app survive. go2.appspot.com Andrew Badera wrote: Considering the nature of your service, why are you soliciting donations on the GAE dev list? Shouldn't you be soliciting donations from all these users you have, rather than anonymous, random people on a dev list? If you're drawing so much traffic, you need to establish an advertising package that covers your costs, not begging for donations on the dev list. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: appspot.com - Traffic Details From Alexa
http://www.alexa.com/data/details/traffic_details/appspot.com It can be reference, not reliable. Let Delete My Apps wrote: This site is very useful (but is it reliable?) http://www.alexa.com/data/details/traffic_details/appspot.com --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: BadRequestError: offset may not be above 1000
On Mar 7, 5:05 pm, Let Delete My Apps davide.rogn...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, I see this error using this code: query.fetch(1000, offset=1001) RTFM before deleting all of your apps. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: Delete causes very highloads
Hi, On Mar 5, 9:34 am, Alex Popescu the.mindstorm.mailingl...@gmail.com wrote: Guy, I am not sure I understand your code. Basically, it says: delete whatever ModelName the query returns. Is this what your app is supposed to do? I'm trying to delete everything in ModelName. I tried to fetch more than 1 at a time, but it caused very high-loads. An option for dropping a whole model at once would have been perfect for my needs. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
