[google-appengine] Is any geo database provide by google ?
Is any geo database provide by google ? like http://world-gazetteer.com/ Best Begards Tom Wu --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] PolyModel needs to be rethought
Hi, At risk of sounding too critical (believe me - i am so very appreciative of GAE), something about PolyModel has been bothering me enough that i must get it off my chest in the hope that it might be reworked. The PolyModel was created to allow developers to access all child entities through the base. i think it is an important ability for the GAE and PolyModel addresses the need. But, (here it comes) every extension (field) is stored in the same table? (entity group) along with an extra field (list) that stores the class names. The problem with this is that if you have an inheritance hierarchy in which your outermost descendant(s) extend several fields, you've loaded your base entities with a mass of irrelevant fields containing an unusual missing (i've never seen that before). if you are building an application that, say for example, reads the fields (columns?) in the entity for display to the user (like the Dashboard's Data Viewer), you end up presenting irrelevant fields. How the unnecessary fetching of these extension fields affects performance i cannot say but i would guess it is not helpful. i tend to think that each subclass entity justifies its own distinct table? / entity ? and would only contain the fields which extend it's base class which resides in the same entity group as the parent. PolyModel could then, instead, walk the parent chain adding fields as necessary until it reaches the root entity. The subclassed entity would be presented as a composite of all the fields within itself and it's ascendants. since the superclass entities are assigned to the subclass entities by parent, the reside in the same entity group and shouldn't be an impediment to scalability or within a transaction it seems to make so much sense to me that i can only guess there was some obstacle preventing it being so and the only solution was what we have now. if that is the case, please tell me so i can just give up on this... otherwise comments are always welcome - thanks :) --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Mass removal of data from an app
Hi, I have about 10GB of used storage in an application ( http://www.thethumbthing.com, app_id websnapshot). It was given as part of a quota increase, I am trying to remove most of the data so that I am under the quota limit when the application reverts to billing mode and so that I can plan the app better. I am deleting (well I am pretty sure I am deleting them) about 1000 rows at a time about every minute, however I don't think at this pace I will have reclaimed much space at all. I am very keen on dropping the data as it is mostly transient. Thanks, Paul. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: Mass removal of data from an app
Paul, Have you tried out the remote_api as a way of deleting your entities? Here's an article in case you missed it: http://code.google.com/appengine/articles/remote_api.html -Bill On Mar 28, 2:22 am, Paul Kinlan paul.kin...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I have about 10GB of used storage in an application (http://www.thethumbthing.com, app_id websnapshot). It was given as part of a quota increase, I am trying to remove most of the data so that I am under the quota limit when the application reverts to billing mode and so that I can plan the app better. I am deleting (well I am pretty sure I am deleting them) about 1000 rows at a time about every minute, however I don't think at this pace I will have reclaimed much space at all. I am very keen on dropping the data as it is mostly transient. Thanks, Paul. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: Can C++ code be wrapped up on GAE?
As mentioned above, you can't run C++ on GAE. If you can easily convert your C++ to python (or java - it seems that will be supported soon), you can run it on GAE. This may be a better idea than it seems - I wouldn't expose a C++ app to the internet without doing rigorous security testing to make sure it can't be fuzzed. Switching to python prevents this whole class of exploits. Otherwise EC2 is a good production-ready option that will allow you to run C++ (and anything else). I wouldn't trust a production app to Azure just yet. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: Is any geo database provide by google ?
No. But they provide a verity of APIs http://code.google.com/more/#products-geo-earth http://code.google.com/apis/ajaxsearch/local.html On 28/03/2009, service G2100 service.g2...@gmail.com wrote: Is any geo database provide by google ? like http://world-gazetteer.com/ Best Begards Tom Wu -- Barry - www.nearby.org.uk - www.geograph.org.uk - --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: Sending Email
Try SchooGoo schoo...@shoogoo.com On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 5:46 AM, Wiiboy jordon...@gmail.com wrote: My domain is schoolgoo.com So I set up the user schoo...@schoolgoo.com. I send it as schoo...@schoolgoo.com (It gives an error if I use schoo...@schoolgoo.com). The sender then shows up as 'schoogoo'. I guess that's Ok, but SchooGoo would be better. -- Alkis --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: New Limits for Several App Engine Operations
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 12:08 PM, ben b...@benmcgee.com wrote: So far I haven't deployed any apps onto Google's servers. Does dev_appserver.py enforce the same limits as the real deal? On the whole, no. It doesn't raise any datastore timeouts or anything like that, since it's not an accurate simulation with respect to performance. It should be enforcing limitations of things like index requirements (if you enable it), allowed modules, GQL limitations, etc. Dave. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Bad Gateway errors at the worst of times
I get sporadic Bad Gateway errors that seem to come in clumps. (One clump was bad enough that at least a few users of my Android phone app have uninstalled.) What sort of details do I need to get in order to figure out the cause? I see no info in the GAE server logs. (I assume because the request isn't even getting that far?) For my requests I'm simply sending a MultipartEntity w/ StringBody parts on the Android phone. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: Bad Gateway errors at the worst of times
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine/browse_thread/thread/391a6ecc2febfc22/f43d82010fb1b598 Is it suggested that I hit the winebythebar.appspot.com domain instead of www.winebythebar.com? On Mar 28, 8:51 am, Tom thomasfmc...@gmail.com wrote: I get sporadic Bad Gateway errors that seem to come in clumps. (One clump was bad enough that at least a few users of my Android phone app have uninstalled.) What sort of details do I need to get in order to figure out the cause? I see no info in the GAE server logs. (I assume because the request isn't even getting that far?) For my requests I'm simply sending a MultipartEntity w/ StringBody parts on the Android phone. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: Sending Email
AFAIK AppEngine strips the display name part, annoyingly. This was
true a few months ago anyway.
David.
2009/3/28 Alkis Evlogimenos ('Αλκης Ευλογημένος) evlogime...@gmail.com:
Try SchooGoo schoo...@shoogoo.com
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 5:46 AM, Wiiboy jordon...@gmail.com wrote:
My domain is schoolgoo.com
So I set up the user schoo...@schoolgoo.com. I send it as
schoo...@schoolgoo.com (It gives an error if I use
schoo...@schoolgoo.com). The sender then shows up as 'schoogoo'. I
guess that's Ok, but SchooGoo would be better.
--
Alkis
--
It is better to be wrong than to be vague.
-- Freeman Dyson
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: does GAE use just-in-time (JIT) compiler?
Psyco is a c module, so no. It is not supported in GAE. That's the reason why most extension modules are not supported. Only pure python modules are. By the way, there's a new project started by Google engineers to speed up python. It aims to be at least 5x faster and, amongst other goals, to be usable on GAE. I read somewhere that it is already being used for serving traffic in Youtube: http://code.google.com/p/unladen-swallow/wiki/ProjectPlan Luis On 28 mar, 00:16, Coonay fla...@gmail.com wrote: a JIT compiler like psyco0 will make python running 5x faster, i don't know if the code in GAE will be conpiled with jit enable? On Mar 27, 11:06 pm, Coonay fla...@gmail.com wrote: does GAE use just-in-time (JIT) compiler? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: Does TOS allow multiple versions of one app that do different things?
The class/__new__ trick isn't the only way to implement a proxy - a
function works just as well.
If the handlers for several pages are in the same file, one can use a
single proxy for all of them.
Replace import file1 and ('/pathn', PathnPage) with ('/pathn',
File1Proxy('PathnPage')) and
def File1Proxy(name):
def call(*args, **kwds):
import file1
return getattr(file1, name)(*args, **kwds)
return call
I still don't know how to write a proxy that takes the file as a
parameter.
On Mar 27, 6:38 pm, Andy Freeman ana...@earthlink.net wrote:
It's easy enough to load the relevant part of the framework after
the dispatch.
Use ('/path', Proxy) instead of ('/path', Real) and in a module that
does not load any of your framework, define Proxy as:
class Proxy(object):
def __new__(cls, *args, **kwds):
from file import Real
return Real(*args, **kwds)
That definition of Proxy assumes that file contains Real's definition.
Someone who actually knows Python might be able to come up with a
generic proxy. Me, I'd need decent macros.
On Mar 27, 1:19 pm, cz czer...@gmail.com wrote:
The problem with the app.yaml solution is that only the handler that
has a main() will be cached (I assume that the app cache expects just
one main() per app). It would be possible to perform a dispatch in main
() to different handlers but it gets a little more messy since you
would have to do this before referencing or loading any frameworks
(unless the handlers all share the same framework in which case this
discussion is moot).
From what I understand, versions can have arbitrary names (not just
numbers) so versions are, in a sense, just different apps that share
quotas and datastore. Only the default can be associated with a Google
app domain though. Otherwise the version name is basically another
kind of app name, which makes it possible to have multiple main()'s
and a mix of frameworks that can be optimized for certain kinds of
requests. It also makes the code a little more straightforward...
- Claude
On Mar 26, 11:46 pm, Robert rjaa...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
you could also in your app.yaml simply define a dedicated/different
handler for e.g. those images as they presumably are all under another
URL. Then you don't need to think/worry so much about different
versions.
Just my 2cts.
Robert
On Mar 27, 12:50 am, Tom M. thomasfmc...@gmail.com wrote:
A very clever solution.
On Mar 26, 6:31 pm, cz czer...@gmail.com wrote:
Awesome, thanks Jeff. I think doing it this way would make my app use
less resources in general which is good for everybody.
- Claude
On Mar 26, 2:25 pm, Jeff S j...@google.com wrote:
Hi Claude,
On Mar 25, 8:27 pm, cz czer...@gmail.com wrote:
The reason I ask this is for the following scenario:
My main app uses Django 1.x and has fairly low, but quite useful
;),
traffic thus often requiring a cold start. It incurs significant
startup time and so the initial requests are quite slow. The pages
also contain lots of images uploaded by users which in turn are
initially very slow to serve up.
What I'd like to do is use a lighter weight framework just to
serve
images and other pseudo-static content. It would be fairly
straightforward to simply create a special version of the app that
when installed has direct access to the same datastore and can be
very
fast. This wouldn't ever be set as the default version of course,
but
would still be 'a part of' the default app and it would be using
the
same quota bank and hopefully wouldn't be a violation of the TOS.
Anways, after reading the TOS I couldn't find an answer to this.
So, in case none of this makes much sense the gist of the
question is
can I have two versions of the app live at the same time (only one
being the default)?
Say my app id is 'foo'. I upload 'foo' version 5 and then I also
upload a 'foo' version 6 with a different main.py and code that is
optimized for a specific kind of content (eg. images, no
templates).
Version 5 is set as the default but generates pages with image
urls
that point to version 6.
This would be fine since you are talking about using two versions
under the same app ID. Quotas are applied based on the app ID (not
further down on the version level), so sending traffic to multiple
versions would be pulling from the same quota pool.
Good question,
Jeff
Can I do this under the TOS and still be a good GAE citizen?
thanks,
- Claude- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are
[google-appengine] Re: Sending Email
On Mar 28, 6:07 am, David Wilson d...@botanicus.net wrote: AFAIK AppEngine strips the display name part, annoyingly. This was true a few months ago anyway. Yup, still does, for me anyway. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: Does TOS allow multiple versions of one app that do different things?
It's not clear that the app cache expects only one main() per app. I think that the documentation says that it will cache a main() for each handler. http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/python/tools/configuration.html#Script_Handlers says that that an application can have multiple handlers. http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/python/runtime.html#App_Caching says: If a handler script provides a main() routine, the runtime environment also caches the script. Note - a handler. Given those two sections, I suspect that the app cache will save a main () for each handler. Perhaps someone from Google will comment. On Mar 27, 1:19 pm, cz czer...@gmail.com wrote: The problem with the app.yaml solution is that only the handler that has a main() will be cached (I assume that the app cache expects just one main() per app). It would be possible to perform a dispatch in main () to different handlers but it gets a little more messy since you would have to do this before referencing or loading any frameworks (unless the handlers all share the same framework in which case this discussion is moot). From what I understand, versions can have arbitrary names (not just numbers) so versions are, in a sense, just different apps that share quotas and datastore. Only the default can be associated with a Google app domain though. Otherwise the version name is basically another kind of app name, which makes it possible to have multiple main()'s and a mix of frameworks that can be optimized for certain kinds of requests. It also makes the code a little more straightforward... - Claude On Mar 26, 11:46 pm, Robert rjaa...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, you could also in your app.yaml simply define a dedicated/different handler for e.g. those images as they presumably are all under another URL. Then you don't need to think/worry so much about different versions. Just my 2cts. Robert On Mar 27, 12:50 am, Tom M. thomasfmc...@gmail.com wrote: A very clever solution. On Mar 26, 6:31 pm, cz czer...@gmail.com wrote: Awesome, thanks Jeff. I think doing it this way would make my app use less resources in general which is good for everybody. - Claude On Mar 26, 2:25 pm, Jeff S j...@google.com wrote: Hi Claude, On Mar 25, 8:27 pm, cz czer...@gmail.com wrote: The reason I ask this is for the following scenario: My main app uses Django 1.x and has fairly low, but quite useful ;), traffic thus often requiring a cold start. It incurs significant startup time and so the initial requests are quite slow. The pages also contain lots of images uploaded by users which in turn are initially very slow to serve up. What I'd like to do is use a lighter weight framework just to serve images and other pseudo-static content. It would be fairly straightforward to simply create a special version of the app that when installed has direct access to the same datastore and can be very fast. This wouldn't ever be set as the default version of course, but would still be 'a part of' the default app and it would be using the same quota bank and hopefully wouldn't be a violation of the TOS. Anways, after reading the TOS I couldn't find an answer to this. So, in case none of this makes much sense the gist of the question is can I have two versions of the app live at the same time (only one being the default)? Say my app id is 'foo'. I upload 'foo' version 5 and then I also upload a 'foo' version 6 with a different main.py and code that is optimized for a specific kind of content (eg. images, no templates). Version 5 is set as the default but generates pages with image urls that point to version 6. This would be fine since you are talking about using two versions under the same app ID. Quotas are applied based on the app ID (not further down on the version level), so sending traffic to multiple versions would be pulling from the same quota pool. Good question, Jeff Can I do this under the TOS and still be a good GAE citizen? thanks, - Claude- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] New to google app engine stuff...
Hi, I just got hired in some job to basicly update and make changes to their website. So I already coded the changes in html and css. I currently need to get a hold on the server sided scripts. I am used to using php. Now they told me they are using google to host the website. This was news to me. I never heard google offers website hosting services. So I got here and the ceo of the company that I work for. He told me that the old guy used google app engine. From what I learned in programming. Engines are usally to assist programmers to make applications or to intergrad your software or web app with someone elses software. So I am thinking google apps engine is a engine that helps you make web applications to host on google. Now I am thinking web apps as in software type stuff for the website. So I thought it's like for exmple. If I want people to be able to access their gmail account from my site I would need this google app engine to build a application that I can put it on my website. I don't understand how you can make a website with google apps engine? I am used to the regular way of website hosting where you upload files and config the server or settings your hosting company allows you to change. So you can make one file the default file where the users would see when they type your domain name. So can someone explain how it's done with google apps? I also got admin rights well they call it developer rights. they use their own domain name. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: PolyModel needs to be rethought
The problem with this is that if you have an inheritance hierarchy in which your outermost descendant(s) extend several fields, you've loaded your base entities with a mass of irrelevant fields containing an unusual missing (i've never seen that before). I'm pretty sure that the base entities (the things in the datastore) don't have those fields. The missing message comes from a tool that is looking at instances pulled from the datastore. It expects to see things and when it doesn't, it says missing. if you are building an application that, say for example, reads the fields (columns?) in the entity for display to the user (like the Dashboard's Data Viewer), you end up presenting irrelevant fields. That happens only if your application doesn't understand polymodels. I'm still working through the details because not polymodels don't support class_name() and polymodels don't support anything like db.class_for_kind(). However, properties() appears to do the right thing. One good reason for implementing Polymodels with a single entity type is that implementing them with multiple entity types would make queries a lot more expensive. If polymodels were implemented with multiple entity types, each application-level query would need to make multiple datastore queries, one for each applicable datastore entity type. If those queries are done in the datastore (as with in queries), the datastore needs to know some things that it doesn't currently know and the 30 datastore queries per application query limit comes into play. If those queries are done in the application run time, limits (and maybe transactions) will behave differently. I think that __key__ can be made to work across multiple entity types, but wouldn't be surprised if implementing PolyModel with multiple multiple entity types raised issues there as well. BTW - entity groups for transaction purposes have nothing to do with entity types or polymodels. They're really entity instance groups because they are defined wrt key name hierarchies. On Mar 27, 11:54 pm, Rein Petersen rein.peter...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, At risk of sounding too critical (believe me - i am so very appreciative of GAE), something about PolyModel has been bothering me enough that i must get it off my chest in the hope that it might be reworked. The PolyModel was created to allow developers to access all child entities through the base. i think it is an important ability for the GAE and PolyModel addresses the need. But, (here it comes) every extension (field) is stored in the same table? (entity group) along with an extra field (list) that stores the class names. The problem with this is that if you have an inheritance hierarchy in which your outermost descendant(s) extend several fields, you've loaded your base entities with a mass of irrelevant fields containing an unusual missing (i've never seen that before). if you are building an application that, say for example, reads the fields (columns?) in the entity for display to the user (like the Dashboard's Data Viewer), you end up presenting irrelevant fields. How the unnecessary fetching of these extension fields affects performance i cannot say but i would guess it is not helpful. i tend to think that each subclass entity justifies its own distinct table? / entity ? and would only contain the fields which extend it's base class which resides in the same entity group as the parent. PolyModel could then, instead, walk the parent chain adding fields as necessary until it reaches the root entity. The subclassed entity would be presented as a composite of all the fields within itself and it's ascendants. since the superclass entities are assigned to the subclass entities by parent, the reside in the same entity group and shouldn't be an impediment to scalability or within a transaction it seems to make so much sense to me that i can only guess there was some obstacle preventing it being so and the only solution was what we have now. if that is the case, please tell me so i can just give up on this... otherwise comments are always welcome - thanks :) --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: users.get_current_user() returns previous logged out domain user
Parth, I would clear all cookies and then try logoff/logon again. If that doesn't work, then do a work around. I haven't done any gadget connection work between Sites and GAE, but I would be surprised if Google created persistent session stores of logon information between a gadget and GAE. Logon info that persists after a logoff suggests a cookie to me. Would be interested in the solution, if you have time to post it. Peter On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 12:09 AM, Parth parth...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I have a GAE app that is restricted to a domain and I access this GAE App using its url in a Google Gadget. It works fine but the problem happens when I logout of the domain and then login again as another user of same domain. When I login as the second user, users.get_current_user() still returns me the previous logged out user . I Have added the Gadget to my page on Google Sites. For instance, If my domain is foo.com I have a page mypage on foo.com On this page I have added a Google Gadget that has content type Url and src set to my GAE app. Hope this explains the problem. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: users.get_current_user() returns previous logged out domain user
can you make sure using firebug--or something-- that your browser actually make the request ... i had this problem before and i had to add random number at the end of the url to make it request again... can anyone tell , which should be the ideal response in terms of Expire date , Cache control or Last modified for authenticated pages , i think the default response is not working here.is there anybody who has the same problem?? On Mar 27, 12:09 pm, Parth parth...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I have a GAE app that is restricted to a domain and I access this GAE App using its url in a Google Gadget. It works fine but the problem happens when I logout of the domain and then login again as another user of same domain. When I login as the second user, users.get_current_user() still returns me the previous logged out user . I Have added the Gadget to my page on Google Sites. For instance, If my domain is foo.com I have a page mypage on foo.com On this page I have added a Google Gadget that has content type Url and src set to my GAE app. Hope this explains the problem. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: Google Geocoding not working
Hi Ehmo, did you find the solution for this? I'm running into the
same problem. I know the key is correct but the geo-coding service is
throwing the 601. Are you still using the proxy or did you ditch the
app engine completely?
On Feb 17, 4:54 am, ehmo disku...@gmail.com wrote:
I did register it for API key but it's not working. I tried almost
everything, and now i just made another script on another domain,
which is doing all this thing instead of GAE. But it's annoying if i
can't use google service in google service.
ehmo
Barry wrote,
I beleive you need to register the key for the {appid}.appspot.com
domain, due to the way urlfetch sends the HTTP referer header. (even
if you
However appengine is a shared system and urlfetch uses a proxy and the
API geocoder limits requests by IP address. For that reason Jarek's
advice to use the ajax method is probably best - that way the request
comes from the users IP which is less likly to be throttled.
On 17/02/2009, ehmo disku...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey guys,
i'm trying to use Google Geocoding service
http://code.google.com/apis/maps/documentation/geocoding/index.html
via http.
I generated API key for actual domain and it's not working {u'Status':
{u'code': 610, u'request': u'geocode'}, u'name': u'Brno'}.
610 mean it's not good key for this domain. I tryied it on another
hosting with php, it's working. I tryied it on another hosting with
same python lib and it's working too. I tryied to use urlfetch and
urllib2, nothing works.
Any idea?
Maybe it's because of header restrictions, but i really don't know.
That link, which is called is ok, coz if i'll try it in browser,
everything works. All data are encoded before posting, there is 100%
not problem.
Thnx for help
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: Does TOS allow multiple versions of one app that do different things?
Thanks Andy. I tried a second handler as I'd sketched out earlier in the thread, i.e. without it being the main.py. I then later made that handler the main.py, but did not see any differences in performance. Would indeed be nice for someone from Google to chime in Robert On Mar 28, 6:09 pm, Andy Freeman ana...@earthlink.net wrote: It's not clear that the app cache expects only one main() per app. I think that the documentation says that it will cache a main() for each handler. http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/python/tools/configuration.html... says that that an application can have multiple handlers. http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/python/runtime.html#App_Caching says: If a handler script provides a main() routine, the runtime environment also caches the script. Note - a handler. Given those two sections, I suspect that the app cache will save a main () for each handler. Perhaps someone from Google will comment. On Mar 27, 1:19 pm, cz czer...@gmail.com wrote: The problem with the app.yaml solution is that only the handler that has a main() will be cached (I assume that the app cache expects just one main() per app). It would be possible to perform a dispatch in main () to different handlers but it gets a little more messy since you would have to do this before referencing or loading any frameworks (unless the handlers all share the same framework in which case this discussion is moot). From what I understand, versions can have arbitrary names (not just numbers) so versions are, in a sense, just different apps that share quotas and datastore. Only the default can be associated with a Google app domain though. Otherwise the version name is basically another kind of app name, which makes it possible to have multiple main()'s and a mix of frameworks that can be optimized for certain kinds of requests. It also makes the code a little more straightforward... - Claude On Mar 26, 11:46 pm, Robert rjaa...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, you could also in your app.yaml simply define a dedicated/different handler for e.g. those images as they presumably are all under another URL. Then you don't need to think/worry so much about different versions. Just my 2cts. Robert On Mar 27, 12:50 am, Tom M. thomasfmc...@gmail.com wrote: A very clever solution. On Mar 26, 6:31 pm, cz czer...@gmail.com wrote: Awesome, thanks Jeff. I think doing it this way would make my app use less resources in general which is good for everybody. - Claude On Mar 26, 2:25 pm, Jeff S j...@google.com wrote: Hi Claude, On Mar 25, 8:27 pm, cz czer...@gmail.com wrote: The reason I ask this is for the following scenario: My main app uses Django 1.x and has fairly low, but quite useful ;), traffic thus often requiring a cold start. It incurs significant startup time and so the initial requests are quite slow. The pages also contain lots of images uploaded by users which in turn are initially very slow to serve up. What I'd like to do is use a lighter weight framework just to serve images and other pseudo-static content. It would be fairly straightforward to simply create a special version of the app that when installed has direct access to the same datastore and can be very fast. This wouldn't ever be set as the default version of course, but would still be 'a part of' the default app and it would be using the same quota bank and hopefully wouldn't be a violation of the TOS. Anways, after reading the TOS I couldn't find an answer to this. So, in case none of this makes much sense the gist of the question is can I have two versions of the app live at the same time (only one being the default)? Say my app id is 'foo'. I upload 'foo' version 5 and then I also upload a 'foo' version 6 with a different main.py and code that is optimized for a specific kind of content (eg. images, no templates). Version 5 is set as the default but generates pages with image urls that point to version 6. This would be fine since you are talking about using two versions under the same app ID. Quotas are applied based on the app ID (not further down on the version level), so sending traffic to multiple versions would be pulling from the same quota pool. Good question, Jeff Can I do this under the TOS and still be a good GAE citizen? thanks, - Claude- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[google-appengine] Internal server error during update
Hi, I'm running Django and app-engine-patch 1.0. When I enter appcfg.py update ../app it responds with: Scanning files on local disk. Scanned 500 files. Initiating update. 2009-03-28 17:14:23,647 ERROR appcfg.py:1235 An unexpected error occurred. Aborting. Traceback (most recent call last): File /home/wiiboy/Desktop/apps/google/appengine/tools/appcfg.py, line 1213, in DoUpload missing_files = self.Begin() File /home/wiiboy/Desktop/apps/google/appengine/tools/appcfg.py, line 1009, in Begin version=self.version, payload=self.config.ToYAML()) File /home/wiiboy/Desktop/google_appengine/google/appengine/tools/ appengine_rpc.py, line 303, in Send f = self.opener.open(req) File /usr/lib64/python2.5/urllib2.py, line 387, in open response = meth(req, response) File /usr/lib64/python2.5/urllib2.py, line 498, in http_response 'http', request, response, code, msg, hdrs) File /usr/lib64/python2.5/urllib2.py, line 425, in error return self._call_chain(*args) File /usr/lib64/python2.5/urllib2.py, line 360, in _call_chain result = func(*args) File /usr/lib64/python2.5/urllib2.py, line 506, in http_error_default raise HTTPError(req.get_full_url(), code, msg, hdrs, fp) HTTPError: HTTP Error 500: Internal Server Error Error 500: --- begin server output --- Server Error (500) A server error has occurred. --- end server output --- What's up? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: Internal server error during update
Ok, now it says: Your application has exceeded a quota: App Config Service Config App Call Count But what is that quota? According to Quota Details, I have deployed 103 times in the past day. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] sorting database entities by two properties
Hi there! I want to know if this can be done efficiently: I need to sort some database's entities first by one property, and if there's a tie, to sort them by other property for example, lets have the following: class Person(db.Model): age = IntegerProperty() height_in_cm = IntegerProperty() how can I sort first by age, but if I have two people with the same age, to sort them by height_in_cm I hope I made myself clear and thanks in advance for your help Manuel --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: One Page at a Time
Hello, GAE REST predefines pagination with sorting with no additional code needed. It only lacks a link or button named 'next'. It enables user selectable sort order and pagination from the http get query for the first 10 elements sorted by for example date modified: content(type='Entity')?order=modif...@dfrom=0to=10 and elements 10 to 20 sorted by date content(type='Entity')?order=modif...@dfrom=10to=20 or sorted by price content(type='Entity')?order=pr...@dfrom=10to=20 Regards Niklas http://github.com/fczuardi/gae-rest/tree/master On Mar 28, 3:03 am, ben b...@benmcgee.com wrote: That is a great article. I learned alot! Of course, having my cake is simply not enough. :-) Is it possible to have user selectable sort order AND pagination? My guess is that things get quit a lot more complicated at this point... On Mar 27, 3:51 pm, djidjadji djidja...@gmail.com wrote: http://code.google.com/appengine/articles/paging.html --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: sorting database entities by two properties
you need to do one sort in datastore , while other in memory. (google don't allow both simultaneously..). there should be less people with same height than there are with same age. ( this could be subjective...if your database span over all the ages , there are 5 year old to 80 year old . a span of 75 , while most height data fits within 150 to 200 range .. span of 50). so , you should first sort by height in datastore and than sort by ages in memory... just my one and a half cent. :) regards, Gopal Patel On Mar 29, 9:01 am, manuelaraoz manuelar...@gmail.com wrote: Hi there! I want to know if this can be done efficiently: I need to sort some database's entities first by one property, and if there's a tie, to sort them by other property for example, lets have the following: class Person(db.Model): age = IntegerProperty() height_in_cm = IntegerProperty() how can I sort first by age, but if I have two people with the same age, to sort them by height_in_cm I hope I made myself clear and thanks in advance for your help Manuel --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: sorting database entities by two properties
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 3:01 PM, manuelaraoz manuelar...@gmail.com wrote:
class Person(db.Model):
age = IntegerProperty()
height_in_cm = IntegerProperty()
how can I sort first by age, but if I have two people with the same
age, to sort them by height_in_cm
You could create a synthetic property that you sort on instead:
age_height_sort = db.IntegerProperty()
You can set it in a put() override:
def put(self):
self.age_height_sort = self.age*1000 + self.height_in_cm
return super(Person, self).put()
Then you can just order by that synthetic property:
Person.all().order('age_height_sort')
Dave.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] memcache won't be flushed after app is redeployed
the data strore is cleaned ,then i redeploy my app,next access my app via chrome,i found there are stale date in the memcache ,and i make sure these data has been deleted using the data viewer, My question is : won't the memcache be flushed after app is redeployed?(appcfg.py update myapp) Ps:how to restart my app completely? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
