[google-appengine] Re: sendmail InvalidSenderError
Tony, Your emphasizing of the word FROM really helped me think and I was able to make a simple change which keeps the TO address variable, but altered the FROM address as Wooble has suggested. But... The one person's case that raised this issue still producing the exact same error message. I seem to vaguely remember reading something about how the users service cannot reliably tell if the person's email address is correct. Am I remembering correctly, and could this be the problem in this case? On Jul 15, 6:54 pm, Tony fatd...@gmail.com wrote: The FROM address must either be a.) the currently logged in user, or b.) a registered admin of the app. If you want to get around that limitation, you'll have to utilize a service external to GAE. Thanx, Brian --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] What is the best way to implement user ranking considering app engine limitations?
So far I see two ways one that would automatically update user rank whenever his points change. or periodically rebuild whole ranking in the background. Both have advantages and disadvantages but is there general good pattern for this problem? kind regards w --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: can not force delete a index with error!
I've the sample problem, my app id is sri-lankan, and my index City is having the problem. I tried appcfg.py vacuum_indexes many times but it didn't work. Please help me. Kr, Ramesh On Jul 13, 7:38 pm, jb j.b...@gmx.de wrote: Hello, all myindexare stuck at error for some days now. I tried to vacuum_indexes and update_indexes but nothing happend. Could anyone from google take a look at my indexes? My app id is iferienhaus. Thanks. On Jul 1, 12:13 am, Jeff S (Google) j...@google.com wrote: Hello hu, I think the issues with adobeman's app have been addressed. What is your app ID? I'll take a look. Thank you, Jeff On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 2:32 AM, hu itswa...@gmail.com wrote: i got this problem too,and hope be resolved On Jun 29, 12:13 pm, adobeman xil...@gmail.com wrote: I have someindexshowing as error , and tried appcfg.py vacuum_indexes My_application/ appcfg.py update_indexes My_application/ but after Ideletetheindexby command line, theindexstill shows up in the admin page. Anyone have idea how to effectively clear all the indexs, so I can try to rebuild the indexes for my application?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] App always fails to load the first time
Google AppEngineers, I'm experiencing a prolonged annoyance that started with my second google app engine app. What is happening is that the handler for the main page serves largely static content. class MainHandler(webapp.RequestHandler): def get(self): self.response.headers['Content-Type'] = 'text/html' self.response.out.write( htmlheadtitleHello world/title/head bodyHello world/body/html ') and it is registered and every time you first load the page, it logs: INFO 2009-07-17 22:14:11,414 dev_appserver.py:2982] GET / HTTP/1.1 200 - INFO 2009-07-17 22:14:11,423 dev_appserver_index.py:212] Updating /Users/dave/Code/phosphor-app/index.yaml But it returns 0 bytes of data. Then the second time you call the page: INFO 2009-07-17 22:24:33,228 dev_appserver.py:2982] GET / HTTP/1.1 200 - And the request has all of the proper headers and data output. All subsequent requests after the first work too. When you deploy the app, the first time you hit the site, it comes up blank, but the subsequent reloads work. Does anyone have any idea of what could be the issue? This app is currently no more than a simple helloworld example at the moment and there is no other content. -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- http://blog.dloh.org/ --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] why can't upload:java.lang.IllegalStateException: This HttpURLConnection has previously failed
Unable to upload: java.lang.IllegalStateException: This HttpURLConnection has previously failed (and the error has been reported) at com.oaklandsw.http.HttpURLConnection.getResponseStream(Unknown Source) at com.oaklandsw.http.HttpURLConnection.getInputStream(Unknown Source) at com.google.appengine.tools.admin.ServerConnection.connect (ServerConnection.java:339) at com.google.appengine.tools.admin.ServerConnection.getAuthToken (ServerConnection.java:250) at com.google.appengine.tools.admin.ServerConnection.authenticate (ServerConnection.java:218) at com.google.appengine.tools.admin.ServerConnection.send (ServerConnection.java:145) at com.google.appengine.tools.admin.ServerConnection.post (ServerConnection.java:81) at com.google.appengine.tools.admin.AppVersionUpload.send (AppVersionUpload.java:415) at com.google.appengine.tools.admin.AppVersionUpload.beginTransaction (AppVersionUpload.java:229) at com.google.appengine.tools.admin.AppVersionUpload.doUpload (AppVersionUpload.java:98) at com.google.appengine.tools.admin.AppAdminImpl.update (AppAdminImpl.java:53) at com.google.appengine.eclipse.core.proxy.AppEngineBridgeImpl.deploy (AppEngineBridgeImpl.java:271) at com.google.appengine.eclipse.core.deploy.DeployProjectJob.runInWorkspace (DeployProjectJob.java:148) at org.eclipse.core.internal.resources.InternalWorkspaceJob.run (InternalWorkspaceJob.java:38) at org.eclipse.core.internal.jobs.Worker.run(Worker.java:55) --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Application Creation
Hello, i just created a new Google App Engine Account for my e-mail address (which runs over Google Mail) and wanted to create a new application. I did so and got no error message (or success message). But when I go back to the start screen of the app engine, no current applications are listed. When I tried to redo my steps, the app id was already in use. Strangely, I can even deploy an application to the ID I created via the Eclipse plugin and the application is online and accessible. But I cannot call the dashboard or any custom pages that need admin permissions. Has anyone had a similar issue before? Thanks for any help. Regards, Christoph --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Performance of indexes
Hello
I have a simple query like this: MyEntity.all().filter('prop1 =',
value1).filter('prop2 =', value2).get()
Every now and then it times out. To me it looks simply enough, but as
I started digging into the issue i came to doubt that I had the proper
indexes in place. In a relational database I would have made a
composite index for prop1 and prop2, but I can't find anything in the
app engine documentation about such an index. Rather I think it
suggests that the default indexes are sufficient for handling fetches
filtered by two attributes.
Does anybody know if default indexes are just as efficient as a
composite index, would the composite index be used at all?
Cheers
Tonny
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] A question abort Creating index for id
I have created a db Entity named TextRec , and the Entity has an
property named id by me.
I want to create an index of the id, but the appcfg.py goes error. The
error is below:
Saving authentication cookies to C:\Documents and Settings
\Administrator/.appcfg
_cookies
Cloning 1 application file.
Closing update.
Uploading index definitions.
Error 400: --- begin server output ---
Creating a composite index failed: This index:
entity_type: TextRec
ancestor: false
Property {
name: id
direction: 2
}
is not necessary, since single-property indices are built in. Please
remove it f
rom your index file and upgrade to the latest version of the SDK, if
you haven't
already.
--- end server output ---
And the index isn't created.
I think the property named id by me was conflict with something, and
cause the index creating failed.
I want to know how to create an index for my property id.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: What is the best way to implement user ranking considering app engine limitations?
http://code.google.com/p/google-app-engine-ranklist/ Regards. On 18 juil, 15:05, wonglik wag...@gmail.com wrote: So far I see two ways one that would automatically update user rank whenever his points change. or periodically rebuild whole ranking in the background. Both have advantages and disadvantages but is there general good pattern for this problem? kind regards w --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: App always fails to load the first time
On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 7:32 PM, djidjadji djidja...@gmail.com wrote: Do you have these lines at the end of your handler.py file if __name__ == __main__: main() That was it! if __name__ == __man__: main() is not the same :) -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- http://blog.dloh.org/ --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: App always fails to load the first time
Do you have these lines at the end of your handler.py file if __name__ == __main__: main() 2009/7/18 David Goehrig d...@nexttolast.com: Google AppEngineers, I'm experiencing a prolonged annoyance that started with my second google app engine app. What is happening is that the handler for the main page serves largely static content. class MainHandler(webapp.RequestHandler): def get(self): self.response.headers['Content-Type'] = 'text/html' self.response.out.write( htmlheadtitleHello world/title/head bodyHello world/body/html ') and it is registered and every time you first load the page, it logs: INFO 2009-07-17 22:14:11,414 dev_appserver.py:2982] GET / HTTP/1.1 200 - INFO 2009-07-17 22:14:11,423 dev_appserver_index.py:212] Updating /Users/dave/Code/phosphor-app/index.yaml But it returns 0 bytes of data. Then the second time you call the page: INFO 2009-07-17 22:24:33,228 dev_appserver.py:2982] GET / HTTP/1.1 200 - And the request has all of the proper headers and data output. All subsequent requests after the first work too. When you deploy the app, the first time you hit the site, it comes up blank, but the subsequent reloads work. Does anyone have any idea of what could be the issue? This app is currently no more than a simple helloworld example at the moment and there is no other content. -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- http://blog.dloh.org/ --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Server Error,please help me
today i update my gae file,and some error happened so i roolback. but after roolback about 6 times ,server error happend! i can;t update my data,can not upload file,and i when i contol it as a user in appengine.google.com, Server Error display!!! what happend ,and how to solve the problom? the appcfg.py say i have too many versons,but i only upload one! --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: Performance of indexes
If my memory is correct Bret Slatkin talked about these type of
queries in a I/O 2009 presentation. You don't need a composite index
for this type of query. It uses the single property indexes.
You have to write your code to deal with TimeOut Exceptions.
You can retry the read when you get a TimeOut.
This often helps but there are times that even 2 retries fail.
You have to write code to deal with this situation.
The TimeOut Exceptions happen for a very small percentage of Bigtable
operations.
2009/7/18 Tonny mezz...@gmail.com:
Hello
I have a simple query like this: MyEntity.all().filter('prop1 =',
value1).filter('prop2 =', value2).get()
Every now and then it times out. To me it looks simply enough, but as
I started digging into the issue i came to doubt that I had the proper
indexes in place. In a relational database I would have made a
composite index for prop1 and prop2, but I can't find anything in the
app engine documentation about such an index. Rather I think it
suggests that the default indexes are sufficient for handling fetches
filtered by two attributes.
Does anybody know if default indexes are just as efficient as a
composite index, would the composite index be used at all?
Cheers
Tonny
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: Eating one's own dog food
There are those of us who are betting real $s that GAE is a real platform for serving an app that needs to scale. I am grateful that GOOG lets me host my glassblowing web site for free (scalability not an issue). I expect to pay money to GOOG for this platform if/when things go well. Hopefully I will pay them a lot :-). My $.02 is that the email-based QA support has been very good. The GAE Marketing department seems to need major surgery: - you have to set meet a feature roadmap (with dates), - you have to be able to provide reference customers. These are business basics. Jeff On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 7:38 PM, GenghisOnemdkach...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Juguang Your words provide a nice counter-balance to those who are not so happy with App Engine. Yes, you are correct in reminding us all that we should be grateful for something free. And yes App Engine has likely provided a whole bunch of young, inquiring minds with an amazing opportunity to tinker and learn on a global scale. But for some strange reason, I'm also reminded of that old saying...you get what you pay for. On Jul 16, 7:26 pm, Juguang XIAO jugu...@gmail.com wrote: Dogfooding, as wikipedia names it, is ideological, may not be practical. People, as well as company, lives practically for surviving first then chasing dreams. I have seen the positive movement from Google, did so much for developers. People may take it for granted, thinking the leader should do more. I am content with GAE, as it offers some free and exciting stuffs. I cannot ask Google to give more, unless he decided so. People can be happy when they are grateful. Technically speaking, I do not think Google offers its best to developers. It will be too costy to do so. Their mainstream businesses need to be maintained, and I guess each business unit has its own authority and freedom to do thing in their own way. Core businesses and technologies need to be protected. If you are not happy, go for Microsoft. ;-) I do not believe, people can run their serious business without serious pay. 6.5 hour per day CUP time is enough for casual applications. If you need more, try to create multiple account, schedule roster among them, sync your data among them. This is the solutions. If terms and conditions of use of GAE allows, there will be open souce projects for GAE clustering. Juguang On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 10:03 AM, GenghisOne mdkach...@gmail.com wrote: So it looks like there's an updated Google App Engine roadmap and guess what...no mention of full-text search. Doesn't that strike anyone as a bit odd? How can an emerging cloud computing platform not effectively address full-text search? And what's really odd is the absolute silence from Google...quite frankly, I don't get it. On Jul 16, 12:28 pm, Bryan bj97...@gmail.com wrote: This is a very interesting discussion. I would like to see some input from Google. On Jul 15, 10:20 am, richard emberson richard.ember...@gmail.com wrote: I understand that BigTable is behind GAE, but my concern is more with GAE performance and quotas. If GAE had existed when Larry and Sergey were developing their pagerack algorithm, would they have used GEA for evaluation? I have my doubts. They would quickly reach quota limits, way before they knew if they had a viable idea. Richard Tony wrote: Though I realize this is not exactly what you're asking, the concept of GAE is that it exposes some of the infrastructure that all Google applications rely on (i.e. Datastore) for others to use. So, in a sense, Google's various applications were using App Engine before App Engine existed. As far as I know, every Google service runs on the same homogeneous infrastructure, which is part of what makes it so reliable (and why the only available languages are Python and Java, languages used internally at Google). But I don't work there, so maybe I'm completely off-base. On Jul 15, 12:53 pm, richard emberson richard.ember...@gmail.com wrote: Eating one's own dog foodhttp:// en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eating_one's_own_dog_food or in this case: Using one's own cloud. Amazon' cloud is based upon the IT technology they use within Amazon. Salesforce.com's Force.com offering is what they used to build their CRM system. These cloud vendors Eat their own dog food. If a cloud vendor does not use their cloud offering for their other products and/or internal systems, one would have to assume that the cloud is viewed as a technology ghetto within their own corporation - good enough for others but not for ourselves. So, concerning the Google App Engine, are other groups within Google clamoring to port or build their offerings on top of the App Engine? If so, please be specific, what Google products and infrastructure and what are the schedules
[google-appengine] Re: simultaneous dynamic requests, max blob size, multi-blob?
Is 10MB the current limit, or is it 1MB? I was under the impression that the max blob size was 1MB, and max HTTP response size was 10MB. Do I have it right? On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 2:15 AM, Nick Johnson (Google)nick.john...@google.com wrote: Hi Jeff, On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 3:33 AM, Jeff Enderwickjeff.enderw...@gmail.com wrote: 1) I saw that 30 was listed somewhere as the max simultaneous dynamic requests for an app. Is this really true? Even if I am paying, and I have a very popular app? I see the math indicating that one can retire 400/sec with 75ms latency, but I am sure that GOOG-internal apps aren't held to this limit of 30. Is this really a hard limit? It's not a hard limit, no. If your app scales large enough, this will be increased. 400 QPS is a very busy app, though. 2) Great to see that Service for storing and serving large files is on deck. Can y'all give any indication whether this will be accomplished by making blobs bigger (or adding some sort of uberblob)? Any indications on new max size would be great. It will definitely be capable of storing blobs larger than the current 10MB limit. For more details, you'll have to wait for the service to be released. -Nick Johnson 3) Along those lines, has anyone implemented something like multi-blob fragmentation/reassembly for storing serving things greater than 1MB? Thanks! Jeff -- Nick Johnson, App Engine Developer Programs Engineer Google Ireland Ltd. :: Registered in Dublin, Ireland, Registration Number: 368047 --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: Too Many Versions (403)
have you solve the problems?it happened to me the same?:( can you help me? On 6月13日, 下午3时00分, Philippe philippe.cr...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I got this error for 1 hours now : Too ManyVersions(403) My quota stuff is green. I have only 1 version of my app. I tried making a new version, but it did not upload anything. I hope someone can help. here is the full error message: Deploying new version. 2009-06-13 08:44:11,328 ERROR appcfg.py:1241 An unexpected error occurred. Aborting. Traceback (most recent call last): File C:\Program Files\Google\google_appengine\google\appengine\tools \appcfg.py, line 1234, in DoUpload self.Commit() File C:\Program Files\Google\google_appengine\google\appengine\tools \appcfg.py, line 1106, in Commit self.Deploy() File C:\Program Files\Google\google_appengine\google\appengine\tools \appcfg.py, line 1134, in Deploy version=self.version) File C:\Program Files\Google\google_appengine\google\appengine\tools \appengine_rpc.py, line 344, in Send f = self.opener.open(req) File C:\python25\lib\urllib2.py, line 387, in open response = meth (req, response) File C:\python25\lib\urllib2.py, line 498, in http_response 'http', request, response, code, msg, hdrs) File C:\python25\lib\urllib2.py, line 425, in error return self._call_chain(*args) File C:\python25\lib\urllib2.py, line 360, in _call_chain result = func(*args) File C:\python25\lib\urllib2.py, line 506, in http_error_default raise HTTPError(req.get_full_url(), code, msg, hdrs, fp) HTTPError: HTTP Error 403: Forbidden Rolling back the update. Error 403: --- begin server output --- Too ManyVersions(403) The application already has themaximumnumberofversions. --- end server output --- Thank you ! --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: Too Many Versions (403)
have you solve the problems?it happened to me the same?:( can you help me? On 6月26日, 下午3时04分, dannyr danny...@gmail.com wrote: I'm getting the following error. I only have 1 version of the app. According to Quota Details, my Deployments are only 28 of 250 (11%). My application name is 'launchset'. Deploying new version. 2009-06-25 23:50:52,071 ERROR appcfg.py:1241 An unexpected error occurred. Abort ing. Traceback (most recent call last): File C:\Program Files\Google\google_appengine\google\appengine\tools \appcfg.p y, line 1234, in DoUpload self.Commit() File C:\Program Files\Google\google_appengine\google\appengine\tools \appcfg.p y, line 1106, in Commit self.Deploy() File C:\Program Files\Google\google_appengine\google\appengine\tools \appcfg.p y, line 1134, in Deploy version=self.version) File C:\Program Files\Google\google_appengine\google\appengine\tools \appengin e_rpc.py, line 344, in Send f = self.opener.open(req) File C:\Python25\lib\urllib2.py, line 387, in open response = meth(req, response) File C:\Python25\lib\urllib2.py, line 498, in http_response 'http', request, response, code, msg, hdrs) File C:\Python25\lib\urllib2.py, line 425, in error return self._call_chain(*args) File C:\Python25\lib\urllib2.py, line 360, in _call_chain result = func(*args) File C:\Python25\lib\urllib2.py, line 506, in http_error_default raise HTTPError(req.get_full_url(), code, msg, hdrs, fp) HTTPError: HTTP Error 403: Forbidden Rolling back the update. Error 403: --- begin server output --- Too ManyVersions(403) The application already has themaximumnumberofversions. --- end server output --- --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
