[appengine-java] Massive delete (mapreduce based) Datastore viewer Datastore statistics unavailable
My problem: 1. I execute a massive delete over a large number of entities (30 million), using a mapreduce-based job similar to Ikai's one (*) 2. Then both the datastore viewer and the datastore statistics in the dashboard become unavailable: I get this famous the server encountered an error (blahblah) page. Yet, servlet-based queries against the datastore are ok, and the datastore indexes viewer do not show any error. Any clue ? (*) http://ikaisays.com/2010/07/09/using-the-java-mapper-framework-for-app-engin e/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
[appengine-java] Re: AppEngine 1.4.0 now supports jsp-config in web.xml
Interesting, I love seeing uncool but still useful features added in the SDK. -g. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
[appengine-java] Problem switching to 1.4.0 - JSP compilation fails
Hello, I'm having trouble switching to 1.4.0 SDK. Development server starts regularly, but when I try to load my login page (a jsp file) I get the following error: [WARN] /_ah/login_required org.apache.jasper.JasperException: Unable to compile class for JSP: An error occurred at line: 1 in the generated java file The type javax.servlet.jsp.PageContext cannot be resolved. It is indirectly referenced from required .class files An error occurred at line: 1 in the generated java file The type javax.servlet.jsp.tagext.TagSupport cannot be resolved. It is indirectly referenced from required .class files [more similar entries follow] An error occurred at line: 1,079 in the generated java file javax.servlet.jsp.tagext.JspTag cannot be resolved to a type Stacktrace: at org.apache.jasper.compiler.DefaultErrorHandler.javacError(DefaultErrorHandler.java: 92) at org.apache.jasper.compiler.ErrorDispatcher.javacError(ErrorDispatcher.java: 330) at org.apache.jasper.compiler.JDTCompiler.generateClass(JDTCompiler.java: 439) at org.apache.jasper.compiler.Compiler.compile(Compiler.java:349) at org.apache.jasper.compiler.Compiler.compile(Compiler.java:327) at org.apache.jasper.compiler.Compiler.compile(Compiler.java:314) at org.apache.jasper.JspCompilationContext.compile(JspCompilationContext.java: 592) at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServletWrapper.service(JspServletWrapper.java: 317) at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet.serviceJspFile(JspServlet.java: 313) at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet.service(JspServlet.java:260) at com.google.appengine.tools.development.PrivilegedJspServlet.access $101(PrivilegedJspServlet.java:23) at com.google.appengine.tools.development.PrivilegedJspServlet $2.run(PrivilegedJspServlet.java:59) at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) at com.google.appengine.tools.development.PrivilegedJspServlet.service(PrivilegedJspServlet.java: 57) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:717) at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHolder.handle(ServletHolder.java: 511) at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler $CachedChain.doFilter(ServletHandler.java:1166) at com.google.appengine.api.blobstore.dev.ServeBlobFilter.doFilter(ServeBlobFilter.java: 58) at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler $CachedChain.doFilter(ServletHandler.java:1157) at com.google.apphosting.utils.servlet.TransactionCleanupFilter.doFilter(TransactionCleanupFilter.java: 43) at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler $CachedChain.doFilter(ServletHandler.java:1157) at com.google.appengine.tools.development.StaticFileFilter.doFilter(StaticFileFilter.java: 122) at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler $CachedChain.doFilter(ServletHandler.java:1157) at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler.handle(ServletHandler.java: 388) at org.mortbay.jetty.security.SecurityHandler.handle(SecurityHandler.java: 216) at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.SessionHandler.handle(SessionHandler.java: 182) at org.mortbay.jetty.handler.ContextHandler.handle(ContextHandler.java: 765) at org.mortbay.jetty.webapp.WebAppContext.handle(WebAppContext.java: 418) at com.google.apphosting.utils.jetty.DevAppEngineWebAppContext.handle(DevAppEngineWebAppContext.java: 70) at org.mortbay.jetty.handler.HandlerWrapper.handle(HandlerWrapper.java: 152) at com.google.appengine.tools.development.JettyContainerService $ApiProxyHandler.handle(JettyContainerService.java:349) at org.mortbay.jetty.handler.HandlerWrapper.handle(HandlerWrapper.java: 152) at org.mortbay.jetty.Server.handle(Server.java:326) at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpConnection.handleRequest(HttpConnection.java: 542) at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpConnection $RequestHandler.headerComplete(HttpConnection.java:923) at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpParser.parseNext(HttpParser.java:547) at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpParser.parseAvailable(HttpParser.java:212) at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpConnection.handle(HttpConnection.java:404) at org.mortbay.io.nio.SelectChannelEndPoint.run(SelectChannelEndPoint.java: 409) at org.mortbay.thread.QueuedThreadPool $PoolThread.run(QueuedThreadPool.java:582) Looks like the jsp-api.jar in the SDK is getting ignored, but it's there and is also visible by Eclipse (auto-completion imports correctly the missing classes if you try to use them from the editor). Is anyone facing the same? Do you know if there's any configuration I have to check to see if everything's fine? I'm running on Ubuntu, Eclipse Helios, GWT 2.1.0 and of course GAE 1.4.0 (from 1.3.8), Google Plugin for Eclipse v.1.4.0. Thenk you very much regards Lorenzo -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send
[appengine-java] Massive Problems with CPU/Guice Servlet and Channel API
Hey all, I try to use the new Channel API. On localhost i've no problems, but the deployed version, unfortunately, does not work at all. There are two different problems: 1) High CPU Avg after calling a Guice Managed servlet: The servlet which builds the token has a very high (not normal) CPU Avg: 12-09 07:46AM 31.531 /token?_dc=1291909591556 200 2330ms 5080cpu_ms 2770api_cpu_ms 0kb Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US) AppleWebKit/534.10 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/8.0.552.215 Safari/534.10,gzip(gfe) 217.119.50.53 - FloOnWeb [09/Dec/2010:07:46:33 -0800] GET /token?_dc=1291909591556 HTTP/1.1 200 199 - Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US) AppleWebKit/534.10 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/8.0.552.215 Safari/534.10,gzip(gfe) - ms=2331 cpu_ms=5080 api_cpu_ms=2770 cpm_usd=0.141237 loading_request=1 pending_ms=451 I 12-09 07:46AM 33.860 This request caused a new process to be started for your application, and thus caused your application code to be loaded for the first time. This request may thus take longer and use more CPU than a typical request for your application. Current Load Table Overview: /token 5 3323 (3323)!79% Hmm okay the request caused a new process, but this message appears after every refresh! So can anyone give me a hint what's going wrong? It takes about 5-7 seconds until the page appears and the servlet responses. You can find the (not much) Servlet source here: http://code.google.com/p/phone-messenger/source/browse/trunk/src/de/rentoudu/chat/server/servlet/ChannelTokenServlet.java So it's not really much code... 2) Channel API Error After deploy, I get the following javascript error (console): Uncaught Error h jsapi:1 Ed jsapi:80 $ jsapi:75 Gd.open jsapi:81 loadApplication application.js:158 You can try it here: https://phone-messenger.appspot.com/ - just login, wait, open console and you'll get the same error The call happens in: http://code.google.com/p/phone-messenger/source/browse/trunk/war/javascripts/application.js (about line 156) I really hope someone can help me, so thanks in advance for any helpful hints! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
[appengine-java] Server error when deleting a version
Hello, I'm getting an error when trying to delete versions 2 and 3 of my application (id = implied2). Attempting to delete these versions using AppEngine's control panel displays A server error has occurred. Any suggestions? Danny -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
[appengine-java] AppEngine-java-sdk-1.4.0 Eclipse plugin for Mac
Is the AppEngine-java-sdk-1.4.0 Eclipse plugin for Mac available ? if so from where can it be downloaded...I searched everywhere and non of the available ones worked.. If it is not available yet, anyone knows what is the expected date of availability? Our launch date has come to a halt due the unable to deploy problem ... so any help is highly appreciated. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
Re: [appengine-java] migrating to 1.4 task queues
The only other surprise was when I upgrade the eclipse project to using 1.4,
it _silently failed_ to copy the 1.4 jar files into my project.
This resulted in class not found exceptions during startup.
I've seen other posts that stated this happened when the files where
manually put into place but that is not my case. I've always relied on the
eclipse project tool for managing the gae gwt versions.
Manually deleting the various 1.3.8 jars and resetting the project's app
engine version to 1.4.0 put the whole thing back on track.
One other thing that is bothering me now although it may or may not be
related to the 1.4 upgrade migration,
Many UI 500 responses are context startup initialization failures like:
12-09 10:22AM 56.796
Failed startup of context
com.google.apphosting.utils.jetty.runtimeappenginewebappcont...@1cc5461{/,/base/data/home/apps/ninuku-archivist/1-0-6d.346785216597395753}
com.google.apphosting.api.DeadlineExceededException: This request
(96acdaff3e9f45cd) started at 2010/12/09 18:22:28.108 UTC and was
still executing at 2010/12/09 18:22:56.787 UTC.
at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method)
at
sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:57)
at
sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)
at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:532)
at java.lang.Class.newInstance0(Class.java:372)
at java.lang.Class.newInstance(Class.java:325)
and -
12-09 09:58AM 28.574
Failed startup of context
com.google.apphosting.utils.jetty.runtimeappenginewebappcont...@15780d9{/,/base/data/home/apps/ninuku-archivist/1-0-6d.346785216597395753}
com.google.inject.CreationException: Guice creation errors:
1) Error injecting method,
com.google.inject.internal.ComputationException:
com.google.inject.internal.ComputationException:
java.lang.SecurityException: Unable to get members for class
com.ninuku.memories.server.handler.journal.DeletePhotoChapterHandler
at
net.customware.gwt.dispatch.server.guice.ActionHandlerLinker.linkHandlers(ActionHandlerLinker.java:30)
1 error
at
com.google.inject.internal.Errors.throwCreationExceptionIfErrorsExist(Errors.java:354)
at
com.google.inject.InjectorBuilder.injectDynamically(InjectorBuilder.java:173)
at com.google.inject.InjectorBuilder.build(InjectorBuilder.java:113)
at com.google.inject.Guice.createInjector(Guice.java:92)
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 12:39 PM, Stevko andy.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm dealing with the change in task queue apis away from .labs.
One change I've encoutered that is not mentioned in the release notes:
http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/wiki/SdkForJavaReleaseNotes
import static
com.google.appengine.api.labs.taskqueue.TaskOptions.Builder.url;
is now undefined.
I suspect this is the proper replacement method
import static
com.google.appengine.api.taskqueue.TaskOptions.Builder.withUrl;
Any other surprises with migrating to 1.4 task queues?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine for Java group.
To post to this group, send email to
google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-appengine-java%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine for Java group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
Re: [appengine-java] DEPLOYMENT FAILING AGAIN
Is this with the 1.4.0 SDK? Are you mapping URLs to JSP files? There's another thread about this issue - we're looking into it. -- Ikai Lan Developer Programs Engineer, Google App Engine Blogger: http://googleappengine.blogspot.com Reddit: http://www.reddit.com/r/appengine Twitter: http://twitter.com/app_engine On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 12:56 PM, Sumi sumi...@gmail.com wrote: Unable to update app: Failed to compile jsp files. See the deployment console for more details Unable to update app: Failed to compile jsp files. === I DIDN'T MAKE ANY CHANGES TO JSP PAGES -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-appengine-java%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
Re: [appengine-java] Server error when deleting a version
I've cleared out these versions for you. -- Ikai Lan Developer Programs Engineer, Google App Engine Blogger: http://googleappengine.blogspot.com Reddit: http://www.reddit.com/r/appengine Twitter: http://twitter.com/app_engine On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 9:21 AM, dleshem dles...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I'm getting an error when trying to delete versions 2 and 3 of my application (id = implied2). Attempting to delete these versions using AppEngine's control panel displays A server error has occurred. Any suggestions? Danny -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-appengine-java%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
Re: [appengine-java] migrating to 1.4 task queues
Thanks for the update, Andy. I'm not sure what the 500s you're seeing are
yet, but I'll keep an eye out for reports.
--
Ikai Lan
Developer Programs Engineer, Google App Engine
Blogger: http://googleappengine.blogspot.com
Reddit: http://www.reddit.com/r/appengine
Twitter: http://twitter.com/app_engine
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 12:36 PM, A. Stevko andy.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
The only other surprise was when I upgrade the eclipse project to using
1.4, it _silently failed_ to copy the 1.4 jar files into my project.
This resulted in class not found exceptions during startup.
I've seen other posts that stated this happened when the files where
manually put into place but that is not my case. I've always relied on the
eclipse project tool for managing the gae gwt versions.
Manually deleting the various 1.3.8 jars and resetting the project's app
engine version to 1.4.0 put the whole thing back on track.
One other thing that is bothering me now although it may or may not be
related to the 1.4 upgrade migration,
Many UI 500 responses are context startup initialization failures like:
12-09 10:22AM 56.796
Failed startup of context
com.google.apphosting.utils.jetty.runtimeappenginewebappcont...@1cc5461{/,/base/data/home/apps/ninuku-archivist/1-0-6d.346785216597395753}
com.google.apphosting.api.DeadlineExceededException: This request
(96acdaff3e9f45cd) started at 2010/12/09 18:22:28.108 UTC and was still
executing at 2010/12/09 18:22:56.787 UTC.
at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method)
at
sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:57)
at
sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)
at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:532)
at java.lang.Class.newInstance0(Class.java:372)
at java.lang.Class.newInstance(Class.java:325)
and -
12-09 09:58AM 28.574
Failed startup of context
com.google.apphosting.utils.jetty.runtimeappenginewebappcont...@15780d9{/,/base/data/home/apps/ninuku-archivist/1-0-6d.346785216597395753}
com.google.inject.CreationException: Guice creation errors:
1) Error injecting method, com.google.inject.internal.ComputationException:
com.google.inject.internal.ComputationException: java.lang.SecurityException:
Unable to get members for class
com.ninuku.memories.server.handler.journal.DeletePhotoChapterHandler
at
net.customware.gwt.dispatch.server.guice.ActionHandlerLinker.linkHandlers(ActionHandlerLinker.java:30)
1 error
at
com.google.inject.internal.Errors.throwCreationExceptionIfErrorsExist(Errors.java:354)
at
com.google.inject.InjectorBuilder.injectDynamically(InjectorBuilder.java:173)
at com.google.inject.InjectorBuilder.build(InjectorBuilder.java:113)
at com.google.inject.Guice.createInjector(Guice.java:92)
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 12:39 PM, Stevko andy.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm dealing with the change in task queue apis away from .labs.
One change I've encoutered that is not mentioned in the release notes:
http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/wiki/SdkForJavaReleaseNotes
import static
com.google.appengine.api.labs.taskqueue.TaskOptions.Builder.url;
is now undefined.
I suspect this is the proper replacement method
import static
com.google.appengine.api.taskqueue.TaskOptions.Builder.withUrl;
Any other surprises with migrating to 1.4 task queues?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine for Java group.
To post to this group, send email to
google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-appengine-java%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine for Java group.
To post to this group, send email to
google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-appengine-java%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine for Java group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
Re: [appengine-java] AppEngine-java-sdk-1.4.0 for mac corrupted
Actually it is ok on Mac 10.6.5 Should you check 'Downloads' directory? Screenshot indicates few downloads of the same file. On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 7:23 PM, Sumi sumi...@gmail.com wrote: I downloaded it from here http://code.google.com/appengine/downloads.html and getting the error it cannot be unarchived can someone help with the location for the correct sdk 1.4.0 for java -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-appengine-java%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
Re: [appengine-java] AppEngine-java-sdk-1.4.0 for mac corrupted
Thanks! I reinstalled al my eclipse plugins and now i am able to deploy. On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 4:43 PM, Tatyana kel2...@gmail.com wrote: Actually it is ok on Mac 10.6.5 Should you check 'Downloads' directory? Screenshot indicates few downloads of the same file. On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 7:23 PM, Sumi sumi...@gmail.com wrote: I downloaded it from here http://code.google.com/appengine/downloads.html and getting the error it cannot be unarchived can someone help with the location for the correct sdk 1.4.0 for java -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-appengine-java%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-appengine-java%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
Re: [appengine-java] DEPLOYMENT FAILING AGAIN
I reinstalled all the eclipse plugins and now able to deploy. On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 2:49 PM, Ikai Lan (Google) ikai.l+gro...@google.comikai.l%2bgro...@google.com wrote: Is this with the 1.4.0 SDK? Are you mapping URLs to JSP files? There's another thread about this issue - we're looking into it. -- Ikai Lan Developer Programs Engineer, Google App Engine Blogger: http://googleappengine.blogspot.com Reddit: http://www.reddit.com/r/appengine Twitter: http://twitter.com/app_engine On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 12:56 PM, Sumi sumi...@gmail.com wrote: Unable to update app: Failed to compile jsp files. See the deployment console for more details Unable to update app: Failed to compile jsp files. === I DIDN'T MAKE ANY CHANGES TO JSP PAGES -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-appengine-java%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-appengine-java%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
[appengine-java] Re: Problem switching to 1.4.0 - JSP compilation fails
I was using a servlet mapping to make my url nicer. Instead of appid.appspot.com/MyApp.jsp, I had appid.appspot.com/servletname. And I was using the jsp-file tag to map the servlet to the jsp file. I have commented out the servlet definition and just let the jsp auto mapping do its thing. And everything works fine, albeit with uglier urls. Btw, I'm using a jsp for my GWT host file instead of an html file so that I can secure the app host file. Html being statically deployed makes it impossible to secure at the servlet layer. R. On Dec 9, 6:03 pm, Ikai Lan (Google) ikai.l+gro...@google.com wrote: We're reproduced this. It seems to happen when you map a URL to a JSP, and only on the development server. -- Ikai Lan Developer Programs Engineer, Google App Engine Blogger:http://googleappengine.blogspot.com Reddit:http://www.reddit.com/r/appengine Twitter:http://twitter.com/app_engine On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 8:36 AM, l.denardo lorenzo.dena...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I'm having trouble switching to 1.4.0 SDK. Development server starts regularly, but when I try to load my login page (a jsp file) I get the following error: [WARN] /_ah/login_required org.apache.jasper.JasperException: Unable to compile class for JSP: An error occurred at line: 1 in the generated java file The type javax.servlet.jsp.PageContext cannot be resolved. It is indirectly referenced from required .class files An error occurred at line: 1 in the generated java file The type javax.servlet.jsp.tagext.TagSupport cannot be resolved. It is indirectly referenced from required .class files [more similar entries follow] An error occurred at line: 1,079 in the generated java file javax.servlet.jsp.tagext.JspTag cannot be resolved to a type Stacktrace: at org.apache.jasper.compiler.DefaultErrorHandler.javacError(DefaultErrorHandler.java: 92) at org.apache.jasper.compiler.ErrorDispatcher.javacError(ErrorDispatcher.java: 330) at org.apache.jasper.compiler.JDTCompiler.generateClass(JDTCompiler.java: 439) at org.apache.jasper.compiler.Compiler.compile(Compiler.java:349) at org.apache.jasper.compiler.Compiler.compile(Compiler.java:327) at org.apache.jasper.compiler.Compiler.compile(Compiler.java:314) at org.apache.jasper.JspCompilationContext.compile(JspCompilationContext.java: 592) at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServletWrapper.service(JspServletWrapper.java: 317) at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet.serviceJspFile(JspServlet.java: 313) at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet.service(JspServlet.java:260) at com.google.appengine.tools.development.PrivilegedJspServlet.access $101(PrivilegedJspServlet.java:23) at com.google.appengine.tools.development.PrivilegedJspServlet $2.run(PrivilegedJspServlet.java:59) at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) at com.google.appengine.tools.development.PrivilegedJspServlet.service(PrivilegedJspServlet.java: 57) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:717) at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHolder.handle(ServletHolder.java: 511) at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler $CachedChain.doFilter(ServletHandler.java:1166) at com.google.appengine.api.blobstore.dev.ServeBlobFilter.doFilter(ServeBlobFilter.java: 58) at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler $CachedChain.doFilter(ServletHandler.java:1157) at com.google.apphosting.utils.servlet.TransactionCleanupFilter.doFilter(TransactionCleanupFilter.java: 43) at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler $CachedChain.doFilter(ServletHandler.java:1157) at com.google.appengine.tools.development.StaticFileFilter.doFilter(StaticFileFilter.java: 122) at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler $CachedChain.doFilter(ServletHandler.java:1157) at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler.handle(ServletHandler.java: 388) at org.mortbay.jetty.security.SecurityHandler.handle(SecurityHandler.java: 216) at org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.SessionHandler.handle(SessionHandler.java: 182) at org.mortbay.jetty.handler.ContextHandler.handle(ContextHandler.java: 765) at org.mortbay.jetty.webapp.WebAppContext.handle(WebAppContext.java: 418) at com.google.apphosting.utils.jetty.DevAppEngineWebAppContext.handle(DevAppEngineWebAppContext.java: 70) at org.mortbay.jetty.handler.HandlerWrapper.handle(HandlerWrapper.java: 152) at com.google.appengine.tools.development.JettyContainerService $ApiProxyHandler.handle(JettyContainerService.java:349) at org.mortbay.jetty.handler.HandlerWrapper.handle(HandlerWrapper.java: 152) at org.mortbay.jetty.Server.handle(Server.java:326) at
Re: [google-appengine] Access from China dead
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 11:23 AM, Will vocalster@gmail.com wrote: Accesses from China mainland to xxx.appspot.com are all dead, I've tried 3 different apps. I can confirm this issue, it has been GFWed(http and https). Also some of my friends confirmed this too. -- Regards, @yinhm Friendfeed： http://friendfeed.com/yinhm 有微码头：http://yinhm.appspot.com github: http://github.com/yinhm -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Access from China dead
Oh, for more than 6 hours. Imagine the heat I've got from my users... Using ping, I found the IP address of xxx.appspot.com changed during this period. Now pinging gets 'Destination specified is invalid', previously, it was 'time out'. Well, I understand google might not change anything, but is there anything can be done? Before, the IPs resolved had been 'harmony', to Chinese authority's eyes. Will On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 11:23 AM, Will vocalster@gmail.com wrote: Accesses from China mainland to xxx.appspot.com are all dead, I've tried 3 different apps. Will -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine's SMS Verification
It is not that I cannot receive an SMS message, because I can and have... it's that for some odd reason google apps thinks that I haven't activated my account, even though I obviously have because I have an app made. But I will fill out the form anyway. On Dec 8, 4:09 pm, Robert Kluin robert.kl...@gmail.com wrote: If you have been to the groups home page, then you probably also saw the note that said: If you are unable to verify your account using SMS, please fill out the this form. (This is also listed in our Frequently Asked Questions.) https://appengine.google.com/waitlist/sms_issues On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 14:29, Brandon Baranowski bran...@paranormail.com wrote: well, I am accessing google apps through my domain, that's the point I'm making here, and obviously I've been to the groups main page in order to post this. So, uh... thanks for the advice? On Dec 8, 2:25 pm, Barry Hunter barrybhun...@gmail.com wrote: if you signed up via a 'Google Apps' domain - eg your 'paranormail.com' domain then usehttp://appengine.google.com/a/yourdomain.com/ See also the groups homepage:http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine/ for more advice. On 8 December 2010 08:47, Brandon Baranowski bran...@paranormail.com wrote: I am fairly new to the google apps deal, and am working on figuring everything out. However, I repeatedly see that you can make 10 apps per account, and only 1 account per phone number. Well, I have verified my account via SMS, and created an application. It then said I had 9 more left, and I am able to access this application fine. But when I try to create another application, it asks me to verify my account again via SMS. If I try to put in my number again, I get an error saying I've already used that number to activate an account. And since Google is the most difficult service possibly out of any I have ever used to contact someone, I am posting here. However, I don't know if this is just peer-reviewed and answered by other people who use google's products (which probably is of no use to me), or if google actually looks at these. On that note, I had verified an account a while back via my other phone and I cannot remember any of the information, I don't suppose there is anyway to cancel whatever is on that number and start over or even get the information to get access to those accounts again? Yours Truly. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine's SMS Verification
It is not that I cannot receive an SMS message, because I can and have... it's that for some odd reason google apps thinks that I haven't activated my account, even though I obviously have because I have an app made. But I will fill out the form anyway. On Dec 8, 4:09 pm, Robert Kluin robert.kl...@gmail.com wrote: If you have been to the groups home page, then you probably also saw the note that said: If you are unable to verify your account using SMS, please fill out the this form. (This is also listed in our Frequently Asked Questions.) https://appengine.google.com/waitlist/sms_issues On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 14:29, Brandon Baranowski bran...@paranormail.com wrote: well, I am accessing google apps through my domain, that's the point I'm making here, and obviously I've been to the groups main page in order to post this. So, uh... thanks for the advice? On Dec 8, 2:25 pm, Barry Hunter barrybhun...@gmail.com wrote: if you signed up via a 'Google Apps' domain - eg your 'paranormail.com' domain then usehttp://appengine.google.com/a/yourdomain.com/ See also the groups homepage:http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine/ for more advice. On 8 December 2010 08:47, Brandon Baranowski bran...@paranormail.com wrote: I am fairly new to the google apps deal, and am working on figuring everything out. However, I repeatedly see that you can make 10 apps per account, and only 1 account per phone number. Well, I have verified my account via SMS, and created an application. It then said I had 9 more left, and I am able to access this application fine. But when I try to create another application, it asks me to verify my account again via SMS. If I try to put in my number again, I get an error saying I've already used that number to activate an account. And since Google is the most difficult service possibly out of any I have ever used to contact someone, I am posting here. However, I don't know if this is just peer-reviewed and answered by other people who use google's products (which probably is of no use to me), or if google actually looks at these. On that note, I had verified an account a while back via my other phone and I cannot remember any of the information, I don't suppose there is anyway to cancel whatever is on that number and start over or even get the information to get access to those accounts again? Yours Truly. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] ascending ordering vs. descending ordering
Hi :) What could be the reason that following query works fine with asc ordering and not with desc ??? Query query = pm.newQuery(Purchase.class); query.setFilter(groupname == groupnameParameter); query.declareParameters(String groupnameParameter); query.setOrdering(date asc); in the log of the gae i read the following exception when i run the code with descending ordering : com.google.appengine.api.datastore.DatastoreNeedIndexException: no matching index found.. datastore-index kind=Purchase ancestor=false source=manual property name=groupname direction=asc/ property name=date direction=desc/ /datastore-index -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] ascending ordering vs. descending ordering
You have ascending index but not desc, so just create(submit) those index definition and wait while index will be created. Once created ur both query will run fine. Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device -Original Message- From: ping bernd.warm...@gmail.com Sender: google-appengine@googlegroups.com Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 02:45:26 To: Google App Enginegoogle-appengine@googlegroups.com Reply-To: google-appengine@googlegroups.com Subject: [google-appengine] ascending ordering vs. descending ordering Hi :) What could be the reason that following query works fine with asc ordering and not with desc ??? Query query = pm.newQuery(Purchase.class); query.setFilter(groupname == groupnameParameter); query.declareParameters(String groupnameParameter); query.setOrdering(date asc); in the log of the gae i read the following exception when i run the code with descending ordering : com.google.appengine.api.datastore.DatastoreNeedIndexException: no matching index found.. datastore-index kind=Purchase ancestor=false source=manual property name=groupname direction=asc/ property name=date direction=desc/ /datastore-index -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: ascending ordering vs. descending ordering
Hi, Thank you... And how can i change the index to descending then ??? The query works just fine on my local machine. There the following datastore-indexes-auto.xml is generated: !-- Indices written at Thu, 9 Dec 2010 11:00:36 UTC -- datastore-indexes !-- Used 27 times in query history -- datastore-index kind=Purchase ancestor=false source=auto property name=groupname direction=asc/ property name=date direction=asc/ /datastore-index !-- Used 270 times in query history -- datastore-index kind=Item ancestor=true source=auto property name=items_INTEGER_IDX direction=asc/ /datastore-index !-- Used 27 times in query history -- datastore-index kind=Purchase ancestor=true source=auto property name=purchases_INTEGER_IDX direction=asc/ /datastore-index !-- Used 1 time in query history -- datastore-index kind=Purchase ancestor=false source=auto property name=groupname direction=asc/ property name=date direction=desc/ /datastore-index /datastore-indexes On Dec 9, 11:49 am, ping2r...@gmail.com wrote: You have ascending index but not desc, so just create(submit) those index definition and wait while index will be created. Once created ur both query will run fine. Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device -Original Message- From: ping bernd.warm...@gmail.com Sender: google-appengine@googlegroups.com Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 02:45:26 To: Google App Enginegoogle-appengine@googlegroups.com Reply-To: google-appengine@googlegroups.com Subject: [google-appengine] ascending ordering vs. descending ordering Hi :) What could be the reason that following query works fine with asc ordering and not with desc ??? Query query = pm.newQuery(Purchase.class); query.setFilter(groupname == groupnameParameter); query.declareParameters(String groupnameParameter); query.setOrdering(date asc); in the log of the gae i read the following exception when i run the code with descending ordering : com.google.appengine.api.datastore.DatastoreNeedIndexException: no matching index found.. datastore-index kind=Purchase ancestor=false source=manual property name=groupname direction=asc/ property name=date direction=desc/ /datastore-index -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] Re: ascending ordering vs. descending ordering
Then it must be ur recent change and indexes have not been exploded. Go to GAE dashboard and see if you can see all indexes there. May be status of this index where u want date as desc is still in pending or building. Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device -Original Message- From: ping bernd.warm...@gmail.com Sender: google-appengine@googlegroups.com Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 03:07:28 To: Google App Enginegoogle-appengine@googlegroups.com Reply-To: google-appengine@googlegroups.com Subject: [google-appengine] Re: ascending ordering vs. descending ordering Hi, Thank you... And how can i change the index to descending then ??? The query works just fine on my local machine. There the following datastore-indexes-auto.xml is generated: !-- Indices written at Thu, 9 Dec 2010 11:00:36 UTC -- datastore-indexes !-- Used 27 times in query history -- datastore-index kind=Purchase ancestor=false source=auto property name=groupname direction=asc/ property name=date direction=asc/ /datastore-index !-- Used 270 times in query history -- datastore-index kind=Item ancestor=true source=auto property name=items_INTEGER_IDX direction=asc/ /datastore-index !-- Used 27 times in query history -- datastore-index kind=Purchase ancestor=true source=auto property name=purchases_INTEGER_IDX direction=asc/ /datastore-index !-- Used 1 time in query history -- datastore-index kind=Purchase ancestor=false source=auto property name=groupname direction=asc/ property name=date direction=desc/ /datastore-index /datastore-indexes On Dec 9, 11:49 am, ping2r...@gmail.com wrote: You have ascending index but not desc, so just create(submit) those index definition and wait while index will be created. Once created ur both query will run fine. Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device -Original Message- From: ping bernd.warm...@gmail.com Sender: google-appengine@googlegroups.com Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 02:45:26 To: Google App Enginegoogle-appengine@googlegroups.com Reply-To: google-appengine@googlegroups.com Subject: [google-appengine] ascending ordering vs. descending ordering Hi :) What could be the reason that following query works fine with asc ordering and not with desc ??? Query query = pm.newQuery(Purchase.class); query.setFilter(groupname == groupnameParameter); query.declareParameters(String groupnameParameter); query.setOrdering(date asc); in the log of the gae i read the following exception when i run the code with descending ordering : com.google.appengine.api.datastore.DatastoreNeedIndexException: no matching index found.. datastore-index kind=Purchase ancestor=false source=manual property name=groupname direction=asc/ property name=date direction=desc/ /datastore-index -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: ascending ordering vs. descending ordering
There i cannot find an index with descend ordering :/ On 9 Dez., 12:10, ping2r...@gmail.com wrote: Then it must be ur recent change and indexes have not been exploded. Go to GAE dashboard and see if you can see all indexes there. May be status of this index where u want date as desc is still in pending or building. Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device -Original Message- From: ping bernd.warm...@gmail.com Sender: google-appengine@googlegroups.com Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 03:07:28 To: Google App Enginegoogle-appengine@googlegroups.com Reply-To: google-appengine@googlegroups.com Subject: [google-appengine] Re: ascending ordering vs. descending ordering Hi, Thank you... And how can i change the index to descending then ??? The query works just fine on my local machine. There the following datastore-indexes-auto.xml is generated: !-- Indices written at Thu, 9 Dec 2010 11:00:36 UTC -- datastore-indexes !-- Used 27 times in query history -- datastore-index kind=Purchase ancestor=false source=auto property name=groupname direction=asc/ property name=date direction=asc/ /datastore-index !-- Used 270 times in query history -- datastore-index kind=Item ancestor=true source=auto property name=items_INTEGER_IDX direction=asc/ /datastore-index !-- Used 27 times in query history -- datastore-index kind=Purchase ancestor=true source=auto property name=purchases_INTEGER_IDX direction=asc/ /datastore-index !-- Used 1 time in query history -- datastore-index kind=Purchase ancestor=false source=auto property name=groupname direction=asc/ property name=date direction=desc/ /datastore-index /datastore-indexes On Dec 9, 11:49 am, ping2r...@gmail.com wrote: You have ascending index but not desc, so just create(submit) those index definition and wait while index will be created. Once created ur both query will run fine. Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device -Original Message- From: ping bernd.warm...@gmail.com Sender: google-appengine@googlegroups.com Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 02:45:26 To: Google App Enginegoogle-appengine@googlegroups.com Reply-To: google-appengine@googlegroups.com Subject: [google-appengine] ascending ordering vs. descending ordering Hi :) What could be the reason that following query works fine with asc ordering and not with desc ??? Query query = pm.newQuery(Purchase.class); query.setFilter(groupname == groupnameParameter); query.declareParameters(String groupnameParameter); query.setOrdering(date asc); in the log of the gae i read the following exception when i run the code with descending ordering : com.google.appengine.api.datastore.DatastoreNeedIndexException: no matching index found.. datastore-index kind=Purchase ancestor=false source=manual property name=groupname direction=asc/ property name=date direction=desc/ /datastore-index -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] Re: [問題]我要用python 寫一個程式
汗，不要在公开场合随便暴露Gmail密码… 你看看后台记录是哪句报的错吧，云端的安全设置可能和本地测试不一样。 此外，这篇文章或许会有帮助： http://www.keakon.net/2010/11/20/在GAE上用Google日历API发短信http://www.keakon.net/2010/11/20/%E5%9C%A8GAE%E4%B8%8A%E7%94%A8Google%E6%97%A5%E5%8E%86API%E5%8F%91%E7%9F%AD%E4%BF%A1 -- keakon My blog(Chinese): www.keakon.net Blog source code: https://bitbucket.org/keakon/doodle/ 2010/12/9 YF CAO caoyongfeng0...@gmail.com 重新传一次试试。 在 2010年12月9日 上午3:05，Toomore toomore0...@gmail.com写道： 你看後端 log 有�]有�o���e�`的 line ... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-appengine%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-appengine%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] Not authorized - can't log into appengine
Hi, I've got a similar issue. I can log into the admin panel and deploy my code via appcfg.py update. But it is not possible to use the Bulkloader with the appcfg.py script. I am using a google enterprise domain and login information. If the script asks for Email and password, none of our logins work. Are there any solutions for this? Thanks, Thomas -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] Re: What's the red and blue bars in AppStats?
As a followup to this just in case anyone was wondering. The second number CPU Time does NOT follow the QuotaService convention of not adding the cpu and api times together and is actually the Total CPU time (CPU time + API cpu time). IMHO, it really should be renamed to Total CPU so as to not conflict with the QuotaService convention. On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 3:49 AM, Fredrik Bonander carl.fredrik.bonan...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks for your (both of you) info. In my mission to improve my application I'm on a constant hunt for milliseconds. But while improving on every request I find it kinda strange that the difference would be so huge from my development server. In appstats the trouble some request that show's 3275ms 9140cpu_ms 7296api_cpu_ms is 1 memcache call, 4 db.RunQuery and 5 db.Get and in my development it's about 400ms. When thinking about it I would think that the red bar (the longest one) is time spent waiting on the request to return. Especially since the red bar is not present in appstats on my development server. I think it would make sense or that for some odd reason my code is so bad that would run that much slower on the production servers. Another thing that bugs me a bit is that this is my third time asking about how CPU/API time is calculated in different contexts but never any answers from Santa's Elves (in sprit of keeping to the metaphor). If I'm right (about the red bars) why the long waiting times for some requests ? It would be great to get some clarification in how this works so we as developers can know how to proceed. I don't want to spend x amount of hours optimizing my code if I can't to anything to help improve the CPU/API times. ..fredrik On Dec 6, 2010, at 6:39 PM, Stephen Johnson wrote: My understanding (please correct me if I'm wrong) of the log time numbers are: 1.) Latency time - the amount of actual real world time taken to process the request. The App Engine infrastructure uses this time to determine if you are (since it's Christmas time) being naughty or nice. Different numbers have been thrown out as to what it means to be nice but definitely average latency time needs to be under 1 second but it's been noted that sub 800ms is preferred and even lower is better. What happens if you're naughty. Well, then supposedly Santa won't spin up additional instances for you. It has been noted on this forum by Santa's Elves (the Googlers) that this average latency time requirement to spin up new instances doesn't include the latency time for background tasks. 2.) CPU Time - the amount of CPU time that your code has used based on a 1.2 GHz 64-bit x86 CPU executing sequentially which equates to 1200 megacycles equal to one second physical time. My assumption is then that if your code executed on a 2.4 GHz machine that real world time could be 1 second and CPU time could be 2 seconds (assuming no API time). 3.) API Time - the amount of API time. Time spent executing in API calls. This number could be very large even even if Latency Time is small. For example, performing a batch get of 200 keys. These could be executed in parallel by the API and could result in large API time but small latency time. Now, according to the QuoteService docs, the CPU Time and API Time are completely separate numbers and would need to be added together to get your Total Billed CPU time. Now, do the logs follow this convention. I'm not totally sure since I can't find the logs documented anywhere and I can't find an example in my logs of API time ever being greater than CPU time. I would assume that at times if I did a batch get like I mentioned above and very little else in my code that the API time would greatly exceed my CPU time, but I can't find that. It would be great if anyone can add to this and if they have an example log entry showing this that would be awesome. Any of Santa's elves wish to chime in? Also, if this is documented someplace nicely and I just couldn't find it then a link to it would be nice. Stephen On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 7:52 AM, mscwd01 mscw...@gmail.com wrote: I always assumed the blue was cpu time and the red api time. Please feel free to correct me if I am wrong though. While we're on the topic of appstats does anyone get a zero value reported for cpu and api times? I only ever get readings such as this: real=774ms cpu=0ms api=0ms overhead=0ms Not helpful at all :P On Dec 6, 1:43 pm, Fredrik Bonander carl.fredrik.bonan...@gmail.com wrote: In my application i saw something that kinda worries me a bit. In the logs for on specific request it takes 3275ms 9140cpu_ms 7296api_cpu_ms for the request to complete. The request started a new process and saved the request to appstats. A typical request to the same URL generates for example this: 384ms 2306cpu_ms 1630api_cpu_ms in terms of time to process the request. Inspecting this a bit further I realized that in appstats the
Re: [google-appengine] Re: What's the red and blue bars in AppStats?
Fredrik, one of the reasons your going to see discrepancies in the numbers on production is that if your request starts up a new instance than that request is going to incur the CPU time cost of loading the libraries that the request uses. Subsequent requests to that instance then won't have that CPU cost and will show much smaller CPU time but API time should remain fairly constant except for some possible caching of data on Google's end. If you implement the warmup request handlers than you can minimize some of that time by having your request handler do some datastore/memcache call to get those libraries loaded in to that instance memory. On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 9:37 AM, Stephen Johnson onepagewo...@gmail.comwrote: As a followup to this just in case anyone was wondering. The second number CPU Time does NOT follow the QuotaService convention of not adding the cpu and api times together and is actually the Total CPU time (CPU time + API cpu time). IMHO, it really should be renamed to Total CPU so as to not conflict with the QuotaService convention. On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 3:49 AM, Fredrik Bonander carl.fredrik.bonan...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks for your (both of you) info. In my mission to improve my application I'm on a constant hunt for milliseconds. But while improving on every request I find it kinda strange that the difference would be so huge from my development server. In appstats the trouble some request that show's 3275ms 9140cpu_ms 7296api_cpu_ms is 1 memcache call, 4 db.RunQuery and 5 db.Get and in my development it's about 400ms. When thinking about it I would think that the red bar (the longest one) is time spent waiting on the request to return. Especially since the red bar is not present in appstats on my development server. I think it would make sense or that for some odd reason my code is so bad that would run that much slower on the production servers. Another thing that bugs me a bit is that this is my third time asking about how CPU/API time is calculated in different contexts but never any answers from Santa's Elves (in sprit of keeping to the metaphor). If I'm right (about the red bars) why the long waiting times for some requests ? It would be great to get some clarification in how this works so we as developers can know how to proceed. I don't want to spend x amount of hours optimizing my code if I can't to anything to help improve the CPU/API times. ..fredrik On Dec 6, 2010, at 6:39 PM, Stephen Johnson wrote: My understanding (please correct me if I'm wrong) of the log time numbers are: 1.) Latency time - the amount of actual real world time taken to process the request. The App Engine infrastructure uses this time to determine if you are (since it's Christmas time) being naughty or nice. Different numbers have been thrown out as to what it means to be nice but definitely average latency time needs to be under 1 second but it's been noted that sub 800ms is preferred and even lower is better. What happens if you're naughty. Well, then supposedly Santa won't spin up additional instances for you. It has been noted on this forum by Santa's Elves (the Googlers) that this average latency time requirement to spin up new instances doesn't include the latency time for background tasks. 2.) CPU Time - the amount of CPU time that your code has used based on a 1.2 GHz 64-bit x86 CPU executing sequentially which equates to 1200 megacycles equal to one second physical time. My assumption is then that if your code executed on a 2.4 GHz machine that real world time could be 1 second and CPU time could be 2 seconds (assuming no API time). 3.) API Time - the amount of API time. Time spent executing in API calls. This number could be very large even even if Latency Time is small. For example, performing a batch get of 200 keys. These could be executed in parallel by the API and could result in large API time but small latency time. Now, according to the QuoteService docs, the CPU Time and API Time are completely separate numbers and would need to be added together to get your Total Billed CPU time. Now, do the logs follow this convention. I'm not totally sure since I can't find the logs documented anywhere and I can't find an example in my logs of API time ever being greater than CPU time. I would assume that at times if I did a batch get like I mentioned above and very little else in my code that the API time would greatly exceed my CPU time, but I can't find that. It would be great if anyone can add to this and if they have an example log entry showing this that would be awesome. Any of Santa's elves wish to chime in? Also, if this is documented someplace nicely and I just couldn't find it then a link to it would be nice. Stephen On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 7:52 AM, mscwd01 mscw...@gmail.com wrote: I always assumed the blue was cpu time and the red api time. Please feel free to correct me if I am wrong though. While
[google-appengine] Re: AlwaysOn and WarmUpRequests working poorly?
It sounds wrong. But it brings me back to a question i've been wondering to myself for awhile now: what constitutes an Instance, exactly? Is it the bulk of all the code uploaded, or just whatever modules were las used? For instance, I have several separate sections to my app, and depending on which URL a request is received on, different code paths are executed, each loading different modules. If I have a warm instance, exactly what is being kept warm? All of the modules for all of the URLs, or what exactly? How does the system decided what to keep warm? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] Re: AlwaysOn and WarmUpRequests working poorly?
My assumption would be and this is for Java (not a python person) that if you have an empty handler at the very least you would get the JVM up and running and some of the basic libraries that are required. Then, depending on what you do in the warmup request and/or your web.xml would load additional libraries. For example, if you use the load-on-startup with a integer = 0 then the servlet would be loaded when the request handler is called regardless of whether or not it is used. Also, if a datastore or memcache request were made in the handler that those additional libraries would be loaded. I haven't implemented one yet but my intention is to use it to load as much of these additional libraries as possible. On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 9:45 AM, Darien Caldwell darien.caldw...@gmail.comwrote: It sounds wrong. But it brings me back to a question i've been wondering to myself for awhile now: what constitutes an Instance, exactly? Is it the bulk of all the code uploaded, or just whatever modules were las used? For instance, I have several separate sections to my app, and depending on which URL a request is received on, different code paths are executed, each loading different modules. If I have a warm instance, exactly what is being kept warm? All of the modules for all of the URLs, or what exactly? How does the system decided what to keep warm? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-appengine%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Can't deploy to appengine
I'm trying to deploy my app to appengine but i can't. Any idea what could it be? Deploying new version. Will check again in 1 seconds. Will check again in 2 seconds. Will check again in 4 seconds. Will check again in 8 seconds. Will check again in 16 seconds. Rolling back the update. javax.net.ssl.SSLHandshakeException: Remote host closed connection during handshake Debugging information may be found in .../appengine- deploy6077282167615956391.log This is my log out: Unable to update: javax.net.ssl.SSLHandshakeException: Remote host closed connection during handshake at com.sun.net.ssl.internal.ssl.SSLSocketImpl.readRecord(SSLSocketImpl.java: 817) at com.sun.net.ssl.internal.ssl.SSLSocketImpl.performInitialHandshake(SSLSocketImpl.java: 1138) at com.sun.net.ssl.internal.ssl.SSLSocketImpl.startHandshake(SSLSocketImpl.java: 1165) at com.sun.net.ssl.internal.ssl.SSLSocketImpl.startHandshake(SSLSocketImpl.java: 1149) at sun.net.www.protocol.https.HttpsClient.afterConnect(HttpsClient.java: 434) at sun.net.www.protocol.https.AbstractDelegateHttpsURLConnection.connect(AbstractDelegateHttpsURLConnection.java: 166) at sun.net.www.protocol.http.HttpURLConnection.getOutputStream(HttpURLConnection.java: 1019) at sun.net.www.protocol.https.HttpsURLConnectionImpl.getOutputStream(HttpsURLConnectionImpl.java: 230) at com.google.appengine.tools.admin.ServerConnection.connect(ServerConnection.java: 337) at com.google.appengine.tools.admin.ServerConnection.send(ServerConnection.java: 133) at com.google.appengine.tools.admin.ServerConnection.post(ServerConnection.java: 82) at com.google.appengine.tools.admin.AppVersionUpload.send(AppVersionUpload.java: 582) at com.google.appengine.tools.admin.AppVersionUpload.isReady(AppVersionUpload.java: 554) at com.google.appengine.tools.admin.AppVersionUpload.access $100(AppVersionUpload.java:38) at com.google.appengine.tools.admin.AppVersionUpload $1.call(AppVersionUpload.java:508) at com.google.appengine.tools.admin.AppVersionUpload $1.call(AppVersionUpload.java:506) at com.google.appengine.tools.admin.AppVersionUpload.retryWithBackoff(AppVersionUpload.java: 629) at com.google.appengine.tools.admin.AppVersionUpload.commit(AppVersionUpload.java: 506) at com.google.appengine.tools.admin.AppVersionUpload.doUpload(AppVersionUpload.java: 129) at com.google.appengine.tools.admin.AppAdminImpl.update(AppAdminImpl.java: 56) at com.google.appengine.eclipse.core.proxy.AppEngineBridgeImpl.deploy(AppEngineBridgeImpl.java: 271) at com.google.appengine.eclipse.core.deploy.DeployProjectJob.runInWorkspace(DeployProjectJob.java: 146) at org.eclipse.core.internal.resources.InternalWorkspaceJob.run(InternalWorkspaceJob.java: 38) at org.eclipse.core.internal.jobs.Worker.run(Worker.java:54) Caused by: java.io.EOFException: SSL peer shut down incorrectly at com.sun.net.ssl.internal.ssl.InputRecord.read(InputRecord.java: 333) at com.sun.net.ssl.internal.ssl.SSLSocketImpl.readRecord(SSLSocketImpl.java: 798) ... 23 more -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: AlwaysOn and WarmUpRequests working poorly?
That's right, I use GAEJ. In Java, the instance concept and the startup momento are all well defined. My problem here is that the loading_requests rarely are /_ah/warmup requests. Most loading requests are user requests, even with AlwaysOn enabled. It doesn't seem right... On Dec 9, 3:17 pm, Stephen Johnson onepagewo...@gmail.com wrote: My assumption would be and this is for Java (not a python person) that if you have an empty handler at the very least you would get the JVM up and running and some of the basic libraries that are required. Then, depending on what you do in the warmup request and/or your web.xml would load additional libraries. For example, if you use the load-on-startup with a integer = 0 then the servlet would be loaded when the request handler is called regardless of whether or not it is used. Also, if a datastore or memcache request were made in the handler that those additional libraries would be loaded. I haven't implemented one yet but my intention is to use it to load as much of these additional libraries as possible. On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 9:45 AM, Darien Caldwell darien.caldw...@gmail.comwrote: It sounds wrong. But it brings me back to a question i've been wondering to myself for awhile now: what constitutes an Instance, exactly? Is it the bulk of all the code uploaded, or just whatever modules were las used? For instance, I have several separate sections to my app, and depending on which URL a request is received on, different code paths are executed, each loading different modules. If I have a warm instance, exactly what is being kept warm? All of the modules for all of the URLs, or what exactly? How does the system decided what to keep warm? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-appengine%2Bunsubscrib e...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: single property index required for composite indexes ?
On Oct 22, 10:00 pm, Robert Kluin robert.kl...@gmail.com wrote: I know this discussion has came up before, but I could not find an issue (if there is one) for it. If you create one I'll star it. See the issue http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=4231 . -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] any good solution to SMS verification policy?
I already have my google app engine verified with my mobile phone and it was just my testing-purpose trial. of course i didn't know about one-per-mobile-phone's lifetime policy of google app engine. now i'm trying to do something real after I've signed up for google apps with my new domain such as xxx.net. but I can't verify myself with my mobile phone because it's already been used. must i stick with my trial one when I create new application? it's not very efficient for me to switch between 2 accounts whenever I do something related to appengine. is there any clever solution already been made for this? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] single property index required for composite indexes ?
Hi Robert, see the http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=4231 . On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 11:00 PM, Robert Kluin robert.kl...@gmail.com wrote: I know this discussion has came up before, but I could not find an issue (if there is one) for it. If you create one I'll star it. Robert On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 14:13, leo leo.ant...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, my understanding is that when you put an entity in the datastore you decide which properties are indexed and which ones are unindexed so that instance won´t be found when searching (using single or composite indexes) by a unindexed property. My problem is that I have many queries using a single property with ancestors, so that mean I have to index the instance and that will appear in 3 indexes (the two built-in indexes for the property and the composite index with the property and ancestors). But I´ll be really be using just one index. Is there any way to avoid this, i.e. be able to use properties in composite indexes without these properties being used in single property indexes ? Is this a limitation on the platform/bigtable or it might change in the future ? (for instance, allow to disable some single property indexes in a kind). Thanks. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- regards, Alexander -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Access from China dead
Confirmed. On Dec 9, 11:23 am, Will vocalster@gmail.com wrote: Accesses from China mainland to xxx.appspot.com are all dead, I've tried 3 different apps. Will -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Access from China dead
Y，New,what should we do? On 12月9日, 上午11时23分, Will vocalster@gmail.com wrote: Accesses from China mainland to xxx.appspot.com are all dead, I've tried 3 different apps. Will -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] Access from China dead
appspot.com被墙了 http://www.douban.com/group/topic/8928422/ 在 2010年12月9日 下午3:04，Will vocalster@gmail.com写道： 你的appspot可以访问吗？我的三个都不行。我在浙江。 Will 2010/12/9 YF CAO caoyongfeng0...@gmail.com 使用自己的Domain才会无法访问， appspot目前为止未发现被屏的现象， 可能是你上传的应用有问题，当然也有可能某些地区将appspot屏了。 2010/12/9 Will vocalster@gmail.com Accesses from China mainland to xxx.appspot.com are all dead, I've tried 3 different apps. Will -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-appengine%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-appengine%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-appengine%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] URGENT: billing stuck with This request may take up seven days to complete
In an attempt to change the credit card on file, I clicked the Disable Billing assuming that I could then re-enable it with a different credit card. As expected, my quotas reverted to the free levels. The completely unexpected part is the billing section on my account is now stuck with Awaiting Recurring Charge Cancellation (This request may take up seven days to complete.). This is absurd! I'm at 50% of my quota already and the day has barely begun and I have no way to increase the quota from the free levels. Is there any way to get the billing on my account reset so I can put in a credit card and increase my quotas? I've already submitted a request via the app engine billing support form, but haven't heard anything back. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Java server side i18n?
How can i use internationalization over appengine (java) on the server side? Does any one have any idea? I've been googling but all the posts that i find are for python appengine. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Access from China dead
I am wondering if this issue is related to this: China Blocks News Websites In Protest Of Nobel Nominee http://www.itproportal.com/2010/12/9/china-blocks-news-websites-protest-nobel-nominee/ Satoshi On Dec 8, 11:31 pm, zhang yu zhangyu...@gmail.com wrote: appspot.com被墙了 http://www.douban.com/group/topic/8928422/ 在 2010年12月9日 下午3:04，Will vocalster@gmail.com写道： 你的appspot可以访问吗？我的三个都不行。我在浙江。 Will 2010/12/9 YF CAO caoyongfeng0...@gmail.com 使用自己的Domain才会无法访问， appspot目前为止未发现被屏的现象， 可能是你上传的应用有问题，当然也有可能某些地区将appspot屏了。 2010/12/9 Will vocalster@gmail.com Accesses from China mainland to xxx.appspot.com are all dead, I've tried 3 different apps. Will -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-appengine%2Bunsubscrib e...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-appengine%2Bunsubscrib e...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-appengine%2Bunsubscrib e...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] Java server side i18n?
Java has a fair amount of i18n built-in [1], are you using JSPs or some other template engine? [1] http://java.sun.com/javase/technologies/core/basic/intl/ On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 12:48 PM, nacho vela.igna...@gmail.com wrote: How can i use internationalization over appengine (java) on the server side? Does any one have any idea? I've been googling but all the posts that i find are for python appengine. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- Erick Fleming -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: any good solution to SMS verification policy?
Get a Google Voice number and send the verification message to that number. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Can't deploy to appengine
I think there are problems with your cached credentials. Try to clean it. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] Problem with Google App Engine Login
I see the pending invites. I've forced added you as a developer. Give it a shot now. -- Ikai Lan Developer Programs Engineer, Google App Engine Blogger: http://googleappengine.blogspot.com Reddit: http://www.reddit.com/r/appengine Twitter: http://twitter.com/app_engine On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 6:50 PM, Ploy ploy.tangtulyang...@uwa.edu.au wrote: uwa-request and uwa-istats -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-appengine%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Availability of GAE app for Google Apps users
Hi - I'm sure this question is answered somewhere, but I haven't been able to dig through all the information to find anything definitive. Here's the situation and the problem: We have built a GAE application that is up and running. It's registered on the Marketplace, but is not 'installable'. (Not sure if that is important or not). When new customers come to the site, they are asked to provide their Google account credentials, or to create a new Google account. This is a personal Google account vs. an Apps acct. If a new customer approaches our site and attempts to use an existing Google Apps e-mail address to register, it won't let them (says the e- mail/password is incorrect). Their only alternative would be to use a different e-mail address and create a new personal Google account around that address. (Most companies won't want to do this, which is my problem). My understanding is that if you try to create an personal acct on top of an Apps address, it causes various permissions issues. (I understand the difference between an Apps account and a peronal account, and that they are being merged, to a certain extent). I also own a domain that uses Google Apps, so I went to the control panel for that domain and added my GAE app as a service with the hope that that change would allow users in this domain to use their company addresses to use the GAE app. This process seemed to work fine, but when my users go to their Apps home page they don't see the GAE app as an option. If they go directly to the URL, they have the same old authentication problem. So the question is, is it possible for existing Google Apps users to access my GAE app with their Apps e-mail addresses ... and if so, what do I need to do to make that happen? Sorry for my long-windedness. I appreciate any help :) Glenn -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] BlobInfo objects and unittests
hi, i need to test my app and i need to have BlobInfo objects to test my functions. is it possible to create a BlobInfo object 'manually' to add it to attach it to my entity with the BlobReferenceProperty()? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Deploys everyday fail at the same time range
Hi, Every day at 2:00 PM PST more or less deploys to Google App Engine fails: Error 503: --- begin server output --- Try Again (503) An unexpected failure has occurred. Please try again. What is it? why is that? please. Thanks -- Jairo Vasquez www.paymentez.com.br -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] Main type not specified
Hi, You probably want to ask this question in the GWT forums: http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit -- Ikai Lan Developer Programs Engineer, Google App Engine Blogger: http://googleappengine.blogspot.com Reddit: http://www.reddit.com/r/appengine Twitter: http://twitter.com/app_engine On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 9:04 PM, Chintala getmoonr...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I am new to GWT application development. I have problem for running gwt application I have configured one of the gwt project in Eclipse. whenever I am running the application it is giving error is Main type not specified. Can you please tell me what is the problem? Thanks in advance. Thanks and Regards, Ravi Chintala, +91 98499 19039. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-appengine%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] How to force urllib2 to fetch newly files.
Which URL are you fetching? Could it be possible they are caching this on their side? -- Ikai Lan Developer Programs Engineer, Google App Engine Blogger: http://googleappengine.blogspot.com Reddit: http://www.reddit.com/r/appengine Twitter: http://twitter.com/app_engine On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 11:25 AM, Toomore toomore0...@gmail.com wrote: I have a problem about useing urllib2 to fetch files. If I use urllib2 to fetch a file more times in one day, when the files is update, useing urllib2 is still fetch old files. So how do I force urllib2 to fetch newly files. Now I have added random no. at the end of URL, but it still fetch old files. Thanks. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-appengine%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] Re: Deployment Failing with 500 error.
When there's a deploy failure, it helps us if you let us know the exact error. With a 503, one thing to try is to disable precompilation and let us know. We're monitoring these services, but you can help us more quickly diagnose the problem with this information. -- Ikai Lan Developer Programs Engineer, Google App Engine Blogger: http://googleappengine.blogspot.com Reddit: http://www.reddit.com/r/appengine Twitter: http://twitter.com/app_engine On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 2:27 PM, dloomer dloo...@gmail.com wrote: I see the title of the thread was changed to reflect 500 instead of 503, but the log dump I get, and which I assume the OP gets, is: Error 503: --- begin server output --- Try Again (503) An unexpected failure has occurred. Please try again. --- end server output --- 2010-12-08 16:25:24 (Process exited with code 1) On Dec 8, 3:32 pm, Nick Renny nickre...@gmail.com wrote: Not getting anything through with deploy. failing at pre-compilation with 500 errors - for the last 2 hours -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-appengine%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] Re: having trouble with uploading app
Thanks for the reports guys. The precompilation service has been having issues. We're working on addressing these. -- Ikai Lan Developer Programs Engineer, Google App Engine Blogger: http://googleappengine.blogspot.com Reddit: http://www.reddit.com/r/appengine Twitter: http://twitter.com/app_engine On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 3:23 PM, David Mora dla.m...@gmail.com wrote: meanwhile and in urge to deploy new versions, the -no_precompilation is the way to get around this annoying error On 8 December 2010 16:50, Jason Spitkoski spitko...@gmail.com wrote: Seems hit and miss. But when it fails, its always during precompilation... On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 4:28 PM, homunq jameson.qu...@gmail.com wrote: My partner and I are both getting this 503-unexpected problem, repeatedly, on different platforms, with 1.3.8. (We're in different countries, too.) We've done nothing with error handlers, and it was working for both of us as of yesterday. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-appengine%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-appengine%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-appengine%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] Memcache expirity and get-for-update
1. From what I remember, no. The initial expiry time is the set expiration. That being said, accessing a value pushes the key/value pair to the head of the LRU queue, so at the very least, the values won't be LRU expired when more Memcache capacity is required. 2. If I understand you correctly, the operation you're looking for is probably CAS - Memcache check-and-set. Unfortunately, we don't support this operation right now. There are ways to implement similar functionality with INCR/DECR (atomic operations). -- Ikai Lan Developer Programs Engineer, Google App Engine Blogger: http://googleappengine.blogspot.com Reddit: http://www.reddit.com/r/appengine Twitter: http://twitter.com/app_engine On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 6:23 PM, Thomas Wiradikusuma wiradikus...@gmail.comwrote: Hi guys, Is memcache's expire strategy work like http session's? In http session, if you set it to expire in 30 minutes and you access a page in minute 29th, it will be prolonged for another 30 minutes. Is this also the case for memcache? If not, is there any atomic way to do it? (i.e. not by doing get-and-put) Second question, I have an entry that will be updated by lots of users, is there any get-for-update for memcache? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-appengine%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] BlobInfo objects and unittests
You should be able to. Here's the Javadoc for BlobInfo: http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/java/javadoc/com/google/appengine/api/blobstore/BlobInfo.html Just use the standard constructor. -- Ikai Lan Developer Programs Engineer, Google App Engine Blogger: http://googleappengine.blogspot.com Reddit: http://www.reddit.com/r/appengine Twitter: http://twitter.com/app_engine On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 1:07 PM, andreas schmid a.schmi...@gmail.com wrote: hi, i need to test my app and i need to have BlobInfo objects to test my functions. is it possible to create a BlobInfo object 'manually' to add it to attach it to my entity with the BlobReferenceProperty()? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-appengine%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] Deploys everyday fail at the same time range
It's strange that this happens at 2pm. I'll see if we've made any progress on this. Do you know if you're able to deploy if you disable precompilation? -- Ikai Lan Developer Programs Engineer, Google App Engine Blogger: http://googleappengine.blogspot.com Reddit: http://www.reddit.com/r/appengine Twitter: http://twitter.com/app_engine On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 2:26 PM, Jairo Vasquez jairo.vasq...@gmail.comwrote: Hi, Every day at 2:00 PM PST more or less deploys to Google App Engine fails: Error 503: --- begin server output --- Try Again (503) An unexpected failure has occurred. Please try again. What is it? why is that? please. Thanks -- Jairo Vasquez www.paymentez.com.br -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-appengine%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Amazon AWS vs Google App Engine
Burry, Yes that was the original question. On Dec 8, 2:04 am, Barry Hunter barrybhun...@gmail.com wrote: Blocking is nothing new. China of course has been doing it for a long time - but they are by no means the only country. Surely in this thread you asking if Google would do anything themselves? On 7 December 2010 22:36, nickmilon nickmi...@gmail.com wrote: It seems the question is not hypothetical any more and a new government request is coming soon: The Tunisian government, known for its restriction on freedom of expression, rapidly blocked the access to Tunileaks. They first blockedhttp://tunileaks.appspot.com/( without the https). One day later, they blocked Google App Engine’s IP address (209.85.229.141) in order to block Tunileaks under https, making appspot.com partially unavailable in the country . (http://elitestv.com/pub/2010/12/tunisia-censorship-continues-as-wikil... ) On Dec 6, 10:10 pm, Ikai Lan (Google) ikai.l+gro...@google.com wrote: I don't have anything to add to this discussion except that we're always thinking of our users first. We recently published something called the Transparency Report which shows which governments ask us to take things down: http://www.google.com/transparencyreport/governmentrequests -- Ikai Lan Developer Programs Engineer, Google App Engine Blogger: http://googleappengine.blogspot.com Reddit: http://www.reddit.com/r/appengine Twitter: http://twitter.com/app_engine On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 6:30 AM, Jeff Schwartz jefftschwa...@gmail.com wrote: Freedom of speech is always a worthwhile subject and its defense is the ethical and moral obligation of every freedom loving individual but perhaps this is best discussed in a dedicated blog on the subject. On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 9:11 AM, nickmilon nickmi...@gmail.com wrote: Philip +1 Still I am not sure that G would surrender so easily as Amazon did, there is a precedence: G vs Lieberman story: http://googlepublicpolicy.blogspot.com/2008/05/dialogue-with-sen-lieb... when G stood to its values. By the way ... http://wikileaks.org/support.html doesn't work for me http://213.251.145.96/support.html is working (for the time been) On Dec 4, 3:15 pm, Philip philip.mates...@driggle.com wrote: It's sad that Amazon does not support customers that exercise the right of free speech. But I'd also assume that Google would not stand up against the us government for offending the first amendment. :-( However, I will still donate to Wikileaks and I would suggest anyone else to do the same:http://wikileaks.org/support.html Our liberty depends on the freedom of the press, and that cannot be limited without being lost. Thomas Jefferson If the freedom of speech is taken away then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter. George Washington On Dec 4, 1:34 am, supercobra superco...@gmail.com wrote: Amazon and Google have been long-time partisans of freedom of speech. However in this case, the pressure coming from the government must be incredible. Amazon is not the only victim of these intimidations. US government employees have been forbidden to visit Wikileaks sites and to discuss these matters on Facebook. At least one US university has been 'persuaded' to ask their students not to reference any Wikileaks documents in their research papers... (how is that for doing thorough research!). Even crounties bend under US pressure. We have seen it to be the case with Spain Germany which dropped their lawsuits, investigations and enforcement of arrest warrants for torture and kidnappings (renditions) after the US pressured them (source Wikileaks cables). So I would assume that Google or any organization would probably comply as well. To ensure free speech can not be prevented by taking down web sites, we need to create a totally distributed website hosting technology based on BitTorrent or something similar. Happy coding. ;-) Daniel Guermeur -- superco...@gmail.com Co-author of App Engine Java and GWT Development:http://bit.ly/hdTHyB Blog:http://supercobrablogger.blogspot.com/ On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 5:18 PM, nickmilon nickmi...@gmail.com wrote: There is a lot of talk and flame wars going on AWS vs GAE topic, up to now all this talk was concentrated on technical and economic issues. News of Amazon throwing away the WikiLeaks website has raised new arguments on the cloud battlefront. So I want to raise here the hypothetical question what would be the fate of WikiLeaks if it was hosted on App Engine ? (For obvious reasons I do not expect a definite yes/no answer from Google's team, but may be I am wrong) Happy coding:-)
Re: [google-appengine] URGENT: billing stuck with This request may take up seven days to complete
Hi Warren, I looked into this, but there isn't much I can do for the time being. The earliest we'll be able to reenable billing for you is 12/11 since there is a delay between when billing is changed and when we can make a change. We'll need to update the documentation to make it more clear that the correct way to change billing settings is via checkout, not by disabling billing. In the meantime, I'll keep an eye on your application. It still looks like you are well under quota, though I understand the need for some breathing room. The application was only created 2 days ago, so fortunately it's not like there's a huge amount of traffic filling up your quotas yet. -- Ikai On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 10:40 AM, Warren Konkel wkon...@gmail.com wrote: In an attempt to change the credit card on file, I clicked the Disable Billing assuming that I could then re-enable it with a different credit card. As expected, my quotas reverted to the free levels. The completely unexpected part is the billing section on my account is now stuck with Awaiting Recurring Charge Cancellation (This request may take up seven days to complete.). This is absurd! I'm at 50% of my quota already and the day has barely begun and I have no way to increase the quota from the free levels. Is there any way to get the billing on my account reset so I can put in a credit card and increase my quotas? I've already submitted a request via the app engine billing support form, but haven't heard anything back. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-appengine%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] please add sub domain binding for any of the appengines.
since china's gfw has blocked *.appspot.com chinese users can no longer use appengine directly. i hope app engine can add subdomain bind to help chinese users overcome the difficulties set by the government. and we can bind the domain once through vps or proxy and visit for a long time. thanks. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Problem with Google App Engine Login
Hi Ikai, I have tried still the same. I couldn't access the dashboard and ended up in the redirect loop. I have also accepted all invitations sent from another administrator. Ploy On Dec 10, 4:17 am, Ikai Lan (Google) ikai.l+gro...@google.com wrote: I see the pending invites. I've forced added you as a developer. Give it a shot now. -- Ikai Lan Developer Programs Engineer, Google App Engine Blogger:http://googleappengine.blogspot.com Reddit:http://www.reddit.com/r/appengine Twitter:http://twitter.com/app_engine On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 6:50 PM, Ploy ploy.tangtulyang...@uwa.edu.au wrote: uwa-request and uwa-istats -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-appengine%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] Amazon AWS vs Google App Engine
yes,I think we may need a new technology to rebuild the online web system, where domains, hosts and files are distributed all over the world, and can not be blocked, cancelled, deleted. that will be a new epoch for the freedom of grass roots -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Using closure with channel API
Hi, Has anyone been using the closure library/compiler with GAE channel API? Can we have the uncompiled file(s) for http://talkgadget.google.com/talkgadget/channel.js so they can be compiled together with other JS code using closure compiler? And/or is it possible to use goog.net.BrowserChannel or other closure library classes to communicate with the GAE channel API backend? Thanks! Mark -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Access from China dead
The issue still not resolved. If it doesn't get back to normal soon and binding static IP is far far away, I have no choice but seriously consider moving elsewhere. Hope China never export revolution, haha. Will On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 11:23 AM, Will vocalster@gmail.com wrote: Accesses from China mainland to xxx.appspot.com are all dead, I've tried 3 different apps. Will -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] BlobInfo objects and unittests
hi ikai, thx for the link. im using python but i guess its the same. ill try it out tomorrow. On Dec 9, 2010, at 6:16 PM, Ikai Lan (Google) wrote: You should be able to. Here's the Javadoc for BlobInfo: http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/java/javadoc/com/google/appengine/api/blobstore/BlobInfo.html Just use the standard constructor. -- Ikai Lan Developer Programs Engineer, Google App Engine Blogger: http://googleappengine.blogspot.com Reddit: http://www.reddit.com/r/appengine Twitter: http://twitter.com/app_engine On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 1:07 PM, andreas schmid a.schmi...@gmail.com wrote: hi, i need to test my app and i need to have BlobInfo objects to test my functions. is it possible to create a BlobInfo object 'manually' to add it to attach it to my entity with the BlobReferenceProperty()? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Memcache expirity and get-for-update
Hi Ikai, Thanks for your answer. 1. From what I remember, no. The initial expiry time is the set expiration. I tested and confirmed. So I simply: obj = memcache.get(key) if (obj not null) memcache.put(key, obj, 30min) 2. If I understand you correctly, the operation you're looking for is probably CAS - Memcache check-and-set. Unfortunately, we don't support this operation right now. There are ways to implement similar functionality with INCR/DECR (atomic operations). I want to keep a list of recipients for channel api purpose. Every time somebody logs in, the list will be fetched from memcache, put the user inside and push back the list to memcache. Is there any better way to do this since memcache doesn't support check-and-set? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Access from China dead
Google, I don't ask you to solve the problem, it is beyond your control and may beyond your capability, but I need you to tell me if you are doing something, how much chance you have and if you plan to do something about the similar cases, so I can make my decision. Best, Will On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 10:11 AM, Will vocalster@gmail.com wrote: The issue still not resolved. If it doesn't get back to normal soon and binding static IP is far far away, I have no choice but seriously consider moving elsewhere. Hope China never export revolution, haha. Will On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 11:23 AM, Will vocalster@gmail.com wrote: Accesses from China mainland to xxx.appspot.com are all dead, I've tried 3 different apps. Will -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] Re: Amazon AWS vs Google App Engine
Not hypothetical at all. People using GAE in China have been fighting for their rights almost since day 1 of GAE, first yourdomain.com is blocked, now appspot.com has fallen... Will On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 6:36 AM, nickmilon nickmi...@gmail.com wrote: It seems the question is not hypothetical any more and a new government request is coming soon: The Tunisian government, known for its restriction on freedom of expression, rapidly blocked the access to Tunileaks. They first blocked http://tunileaks.appspot.com/ ( without the https). One day later, they blocked Google App Engine’s IP address (209.85.229.141) in order to block Tunileaks under https, making appspot.com partially unavailable in the country . ( http://elitestv.com/pub/2010/12/tunisia-censorship-continues-as-wikileaks-cables-make-the-rounds ) On Dec 6, 10:10 pm, Ikai Lan (Google) ikai.l+gro...@google.comikai.l%2bgro...@google.com wrote: I don't have anything to add to this discussion except that we're always thinking of our users first. We recently published something called the Transparency Report which shows which governments ask us to take things down: http://www.google.com/transparencyreport/governmentrequests -- Ikai Lan Developer Programs Engineer, Google App Engine Blogger: http://googleappengine.blogspot.com Reddit: http://www.reddit.com/r/appengine Twitter: http://twitter.com/app_engine On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 6:30 AM, Jeff Schwartz jefftschwa...@gmail.com wrote: Freedom of speech is always a worthwhile subject and its defense is the ethical and moral obligation of every freedom loving individual but perhaps this is best discussed in a dedicated blog on the subject. On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 9:11 AM, nickmilon nickmi...@gmail.com wrote: Philip +1 Still I am not sure that G would surrender so easily as Amazon did, there is a precedence: G vs Lieberman story: http://googlepublicpolicy.blogspot.com/2008/05/dialogue-with-sen-lieb. .. when G stood to its values. By the way ... http://wikileaks.org/support.html doesn't work for me http://213.251.145.96/support.html is working (for the time been) On Dec 4, 3:15 pm, Philip philip.mates...@driggle.com wrote: It's sad that Amazon does not support customers that exercise the right of free speech. But I'd also assume that Google would not stand up against the us government for offending the first amendment. :-( However, I will still donate to Wikileaks and I would suggest anyone else to do the same:http://wikileaks.org/support.html Our liberty depends on the freedom of the press, and that cannot be limited without being lost. Thomas Jefferson If the freedom of speech is taken away then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter. George Washington On Dec 4, 1:34 am, supercobra superco...@gmail.com wrote: Amazon and Google have been long-time partisans of freedom of speech. However in this case, the pressure coming from the government must be incredible. Amazon is not the only victim of these intimidations. US government employees have been forbidden to visit Wikileaks sites and to discuss these matters on Facebook. At least one US university has been 'persuaded' to ask their students not to reference any Wikileaks documents in their research papers... (how is that for doing thorough research!). Even crounties bend under US pressure. We have seen it to be the case with Spain Germany which dropped their lawsuits, investigations and enforcement of arrest warrants for torture and kidnappings (renditions) after the US pressured them (source Wikileaks cables). So I would assume that Google or any organization would probably comply as well. To ensure free speech can not be prevented by taking down web sites, we need to create a totally distributed website hosting technology based on BitTorrent or something similar. Happy coding. ;-) Daniel Guermeur -- superco...@gmail.com Co-author of App Engine Java and GWT Development: http://bit.ly/hdTHyB Blog:http://supercobrablogger.blogspot.com/ On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 5:18 PM, nickmilon nickmi...@gmail.com wrote: There is a lot of talk and flame wars going on AWS vs GAE topic, up to now all this talk was concentrated on technical and economic issues. News of Amazon throwing away the WikiLeaks website has raised new arguments on the cloud battlefront. So I want to raise here the hypothetical question what would be the fate of WikiLeaks if it was hosted on App Engine ? (For obvious reasons I do not expect a definite yes/no answer from Google's team, but may be I am wrong) Happy coding:-) Nick -- You received this message because you are subscribed
[google-appengine] Multitenancy Application
Hi, I have a multitenancy application with tenants creating their own contents and store them in datastore using different namespaces. I'd like to analyze data across tenants, for example total number of contents created. Can this be done? If yes, what is the namespace to be used to access the data across all tenants? Thanks, --Wong Liong Hung -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] Re: any good solution to SMS verification policy?
That won't work -- I've tried it. Submit a request using the SMS wait-list, they approve the second account. http://appengine.google.com/waitlist/sms_issues Robert On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 14:35, Calvin calvin.r...@gmail.com wrote: Get a Google Voice number and send the verification message to that number. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Java server side i18n?
hi.
there is a way to use the gwt constants/messages on the server side. I
use it so:
Checkout http://code.google.com/p/gwt-i18n-server/ from SVN.
Then you have to patch it for the GAE like I did it (see down).
You have to copy your CONSTANTS.properties + MESSAGES to the folder
war/nls_server.
-- PATCH --
Index: GenericX.java
===
--- GenericX.java (revision 1317)
+++ GenericX.java (revision 1676)
@@ -21,9 +21,9 @@
import java.io.FileNotFoundException;
import java.io.IOException;
import java.io.InputStream;
+import java.io.InputStreamReader;
import java.lang.reflect.InvocationHandler;
import java.lang.reflect.Method;
-import java.security.AccessControlException;
import java.security.InvalidParameterException;
import java.util.Properties;
@@ -31,11 +31,17 @@
*
*/
public abstract class GenericX implements InvocationHandler {
+ /**
+* @param c1 c
+* @param c2 c
+* @return r
+*/
+ public static boolean isA(Class? c1, Class? c2) {
+ return c2.isAssignableFrom(c1);
+ }
protected final Properties properties = new Properties();
- protected final Class? itf;
- @Override
- public abstract Object invoke(Object proxy, Method method, Object[]
args) throws Throwable;
+ protected final Class? itf;
/**
* @param _itf _itf
@@ -48,6 +54,11 @@
fillProperties(itf, lang);
}
+ @Override
+ public boolean equals(Object obj) {
+ return obj == this;
+ }
+
protected void fillProperties(Class? itf, String lang) throws
IOException {
for (Class? superItf : itf.getInterfaces()) {
fillProperties(superItf, lang);
@@ -59,35 +70,22 @@
in = load(baseName + .properties);
}
if (in != null) {
- properties.load(in);
+ properties.load(new InputStreamReader(in, UTF-8));
}
}
+
+ @Override
+ public int hashCode() {
+ return properties.size();
+ }
+
+ @Override
+ public abstract Object invoke(Object proxy, Method method, Object[]
args) throws Throwable;
+
protected InputStream load(String s) throws FileNotFoundException {
InputStream in = null;
in = loadPropertiesGAE(s);
- ClassLoader cl;
- cl = Thread.currentThread().getContextClassLoader();
- if (cl != null) {
- in = cl.getResourceAsStream(s);
- }
- if (in == null) {
- cl = getClass().getClassLoader();
- if (cl != null) {
- in =
getClass().getClassLoader().getResourceAsStream(s);
- }
- if (in == null) {
- try {
- cl = ClassLoader.getSystemClassLoader();
- } catch (AccessControlException e) {
- /* GAE compatibility */
- in = loadPropertiesGAE(s);
- }
- if (cl != null) {
- in = cl.getResourceAsStream(s);
- }
- }
- }
return in;
}
@@ -99,23 +97,4 @@
return null;
}
}
-
- @Override
- public boolean equals(Object obj) {
- return obj == this;
- }
-
- @Override
- public int hashCode() {
- return properties.size();
- }
-
- /**
-* @param c1 c
-* @param c2 c
-* @return r
-*/
- public static boolean isA(Class? c1, Class? c2) {
- return c2.isAssignableFrom(c1);
- }
}
On 9 Dez., 20:30, Erick Fleming efleming...@gmail.com wrote:
Java has a fair amount of i18n built-in [1], are you using JSPs or
some other template engine?
[1]http://java.sun.com/javase/technologies/core/basic/intl/
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 12:48 PM, nacho vela.igna...@gmail.com wrote:
How can i use internationalization over appengine (java) on the server
side?
Does any one have any idea?
I've been googling but all the posts that i find are for python
appengine.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group
athttp://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: AlwaysOn and WarmUpRequests working poorly?
I have a similar issue. After having tested my app with thousands of users it now fails (performance wise) when serving just a few users. Even if I just have 1 QPS incoming, it will boot up 10 instances and all of the loading requests are user facing (note that 1 instance would be more than enough to handle the traffic). When all those instances are busy it will boot up new ones, and it will use the warmup requests only sometimes for that. It seems to me that the algorithm App Engine uses to determine how many instances are needed for the current traffic is somewhat flawed... On 9 Dec, 18:44, Sergio Lopes slo...@gmail.com wrote: That's right, I use GAEJ. In Java, the instance concept and the startup momento are all well defined. My problem here is that the loading_requests rarely are /_ah/warmup requests. Most loading requests are user requests, even with AlwaysOn enabled. It doesn't seem right... On Dec 9, 3:17 pm, Stephen Johnson onepagewo...@gmail.com wrote: My assumption would be and this is for Java (not a python person) that if you have an empty handler at the very least you would get the JVM up and running and some of the basic libraries that are required. Then, depending on what you do in the warmup request and/or your web.xml would load additional libraries. For example, if you use the load-on-startup with a integer = 0 then the servlet would be loaded when the request handler is called regardless of whether or not it is used. Also, if a datastore or memcache request were made in the handler that those additional libraries would be loaded. I haven't implemented one yet but my intention is to use it to load as much of these additional libraries as possible. On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 9:45 AM, Darien Caldwell darien.caldw...@gmail.comwrote: It sounds wrong. But it brings me back to a question i've been wondering to myself for awhile now: what constitutes an Instance, exactly? Is it the bulk of all the code uploaded, or just whatever modules were las used? For instance, I have several separate sections to my app, and depending on which URL a request is received on, different code paths are executed, each loading different modules. If I have a warm instance, exactly what is being kept warm? All of the modules for all of the URLs, or what exactly? How does the system decided what to keep warm? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-appengine%2Bunsubscrib e...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: How to handle user page URLs if usernames are not unique?
The usernames are still unique, but the slugs used for URLs (and on other places where uniqueness is a must) are unique. But yeah, most people consider usernames unique. If your usernames aren't unique you might want to call them something else, like display name as Robert said. You also could assign every user an id. If you save the data as entities in the datastore (which you probably do) without any explicitly defined Key, then you could fetch the entity id and use that one. That id will definitely be unique. On 9 Dec, 02:11, Tim Hoffman zutes...@gmail.com wrote: Well then usernames are unique ;-) ross, ross1 T -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Java server side i18n?
sorry the patch wasn't complete.
I posted the complete classes on my page:
http://www.jjoe64.com/java-coding/gwt-i18n-server-side
On 10 Dez., 08:13, Jonas Gehring gehr...@egotec.com wrote:
hi.
there is a way to use the gwt constants/messages on the server side. I
use it so:
Checkouthttp://code.google.com/p/gwt-i18n-server/from SVN.
Then you have to patch it for the GAE like I did it (see down).
You have to copy your CONSTANTS.properties + MESSAGES to the folder
war/nls_server.
-- PATCH --
Index: GenericX.java
===
--- GenericX.java (revision 1317)
+++ GenericX.java (revision 1676)
@@ -21,9 +21,9 @@
import java.io.FileNotFoundException;
import java.io.IOException;
import java.io.InputStream;
+import java.io.InputStreamReader;
import java.lang.reflect.InvocationHandler;
import java.lang.reflect.Method;
-import java.security.AccessControlException;
import java.security.InvalidParameterException;
import java.util.Properties;
@@ -31,11 +31,17 @@
*
*/
public abstract class GenericX implements InvocationHandler {
+ /**
+ * @param c1 c
+ * @param c2 c
+ * @return r
+ */
+ public static boolean isA(Class? c1, Class? c2) {
+ return c2.isAssignableFrom(c1);
+ }
protected final Properties properties = new Properties();
- protected final Class? itf;
- @Override
- public abstract Object invoke(Object proxy, Method method, Object[]
args) throws Throwable;
+ protected final Class? itf;
/**
* @param _itf _itf
@@ -48,6 +54,11 @@
fillProperties(itf, lang);
}
+ @Override
+ public boolean equals(Object obj) {
+ return obj == this;
+ }
+
protected void fillProperties(Class? itf, String lang) throws
IOException {
for (Class? superItf : itf.getInterfaces()) {
fillProperties(superItf, lang);
@@ -59,35 +70,22 @@
in = load(baseName + .properties);
}
if (in != null) {
- properties.load(in);
+ properties.load(new InputStreamReader(in, UTF-8));
}
}
+
+ @Override
+ public int hashCode() {
+ return properties.size();
+ }
+
+ @Override
+ public abstract Object invoke(Object proxy, Method method, Object[]
args) throws Throwable;
+
protected InputStream load(String s) throws FileNotFoundException {
InputStream in = null;
in = loadPropertiesGAE(s);
- ClassLoader cl;
- cl = Thread.currentThread().getContextClassLoader();
- if (cl != null) {
- in = cl.getResourceAsStream(s);
- }
- if (in == null) {
- cl = getClass().getClassLoader();
- if (cl != null) {
- in =
getClass().getClassLoader().getResourceAsStream(s);
- }
- if (in == null) {
- try {
- cl =
ClassLoader.getSystemClassLoader();
- } catch (AccessControlException e) {
- /* GAE compatibility */
- in = loadPropertiesGAE(s);
- }
- if (cl != null) {
- in = cl.getResourceAsStream(s);
- }
- }
- }
return in;
}
@@ -99,23 +97,4 @@
return null;
}
}
-
- @Override
- public boolean equals(Object obj) {
- return obj == this;
- }
-
- @Override
- public int hashCode() {
- return properties.size();
- }
-
- /**
- * @param c1 c
- * @param c2 c
- * @return r
- */
- public static boolean isA(Class? c1, Class? c2) {
- return c2.isAssignableFrom(c1);
- }
}
On 9 Dez., 20:30, Erick Fleming efleming...@gmail.com wrote:
Java has a fair amount of i18n built-in [1], are you using JSPs or
some other template engine?
[1]http://java.sun.com/javase/technologies/core/basic/intl/
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 12:48 PM, nacho vela.igna...@gmail.com wrote:
How can i use internationalization over appengine (java) on the server
side?
Does any one have any idea?
I've been googling but all the posts that i find are for python
appengine.
--
You received this message because you are
Re: [google-appengine] Re: Amazon AWS vs Google App Engine
The solution to this sort of thing is really remarkably simple... set up a reverse proxy on any of the zillions of other cloud providers. A 256MB rackspace cloud instance costs $11/mo, runs apache/mod_proxy just fine, and is 12ms to ghs.google.com. That IP address gets banned? Set up a new instance. Keep getting banned? Automate the process. Jeff On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 7:43 PM, Will vocalster@gmail.com wrote: Not hypothetical at all. People using GAE in China have been fighting for their rights almost since day 1 of GAE, first yourdomain.com is blocked, now appspot.com has fallen... Will On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 6:36 AM, nickmilon nickmi...@gmail.com wrote: It seems the question is not hypothetical any more and a new government request is coming soon: The Tunisian government, known for its restriction on freedom of expression, rapidly blocked the access to Tunileaks. They first blocked http://tunileaks.appspot.com/ ( without the https). One day later, they blocked Google App Engine’s IP address (209.85.229.141) in order to block Tunileaks under https, making appspot.com partially unavailable in the country . ( http://elitestv.com/pub/2010/12/tunisia-censorship-continues-as-wikileaks-cables-make-the-rounds ) On Dec 6, 10:10 pm, Ikai Lan (Google) ikai.l+gro...@google.com wrote: I don't have anything to add to this discussion except that we're always thinking of our users first. We recently published something called the Transparency Report which shows which governments ask us to take things down: http://www.google.com/transparencyreport/governmentrequests -- Ikai Lan Developer Programs Engineer, Google App Engine Blogger: http://googleappengine.blogspot.com Reddit: http://www.reddit.com/r/appengine Twitter: http://twitter.com/app_engine On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 6:30 AM, Jeff Schwartz jefftschwa...@gmail.com wrote: Freedom of speech is always a worthwhile subject and its defense is the ethical and moral obligation of every freedom loving individual but perhaps this is best discussed in a dedicated blog on the subject. On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 9:11 AM, nickmilon nickmi...@gmail.com wrote: Philip +1 Still I am not sure that G would surrender so easily as Amazon did, there is a precedence: G vs Lieberman story: http://googlepublicpolicy.blogspot.com/2008/05/dialogue-with-sen-lieb... when G stood to its values. By the way ... http://wikileaks.org/support.html doesn't work for me http://213.251.145.96/support.html is working (for the time been) On Dec 4, 3:15 pm, Philip philip.mates...@driggle.com wrote: It's sad that Amazon does not support customers that exercise the right of free speech. But I'd also assume that Google would not stand up against the us government for offending the first amendment. :-( However, I will still donate to Wikileaks and I would suggest anyone else to do the same:http://wikileaks.org/support.html Our liberty depends on the freedom of the press, and that cannot be limited without being lost. Thomas Jefferson If the freedom of speech is taken away then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter. George Washington On Dec 4, 1:34 am, supercobra superco...@gmail.com wrote: Amazon and Google have been long-time partisans of freedom of speech. However in this case, the pressure coming from the government must be incredible. Amazon is not the only victim of these intimidations. US government employees have been forbidden to visit Wikileaks sites and to discuss these matters on Facebook. At least one US university has been 'persuaded' to ask their students not to reference any Wikileaks documents in their research papers... (how is that for doing thorough research!). Even crounties bend under US pressure. We have seen it to be the case with Spain Germany which dropped their lawsuits, investigations and enforcement of arrest warrants for torture and kidnappings (renditions) after the US pressured them (source Wikileaks cables). So I would assume that Google or any organization would probably comply as well. To ensure free speech can not be prevented by taking down web sites, we need to create a totally distributed website hosting technology based on BitTorrent or something similar. Happy coding. ;-) Daniel Guermeur -- superco...@gmail.com Co-author of App Engine Java and GWT Development:http://bit.ly/hdTHyB Blog:http://supercobrablogger.blogspot.com/ On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 5:18 PM, nickmilon nickmi...@gmail.com wrote: There is a lot of talk and flame wars going on AWS vs GAE topic, up to now all this talk was concentrated on technical and economic
Re: [google-appengine] Re: Amazon AWS vs Google App Engine
Jeff, can you point me to a more detailed explanation of reverse proxy and its setup? Thanks, Will On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Jeff Schnitzer j...@infohazard.org wrote: The solution to this sort of thing is really remarkably simple... set up a reverse proxy on any of the zillions of other cloud providers. A 256MB rackspace cloud instance costs $11/mo, runs apache/mod_proxy just fine, and is 12ms to ghs.google.com. That IP address gets banned? Set up a new instance. Keep getting banned? Automate the process. Jeff On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 7:43 PM, Will vocalster@gmail.com wrote: Not hypothetical at all. People using GAE in China have been fighting for their rights almost since day 1 of GAE, first yourdomain.com is blocked, now appspot.com has fallen... Will On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 6:36 AM, nickmilon nickmi...@gmail.com wrote: It seems the question is not hypothetical any more and a new government request is coming soon: The Tunisian government, known for its restriction on freedom of expression, rapidly blocked the access to Tunileaks. They first blocked http://tunileaks.appspot.com/ ( without the https). One day later, they blocked Google App Engine’s IP address (209.85.229.141) in order to block Tunileaks under https, making appspot.com partially unavailable in the country . ( http://elitestv.com/pub/2010/12/tunisia-censorship-continues-as-wikileaks-cables-make-the-rounds ) On Dec 6, 10:10 pm, Ikai Lan (Google) ikai.l+gro...@google.comikai.l%2bgro...@google.com wrote: I don't have anything to add to this discussion except that we're always thinking of our users first. We recently published something called the Transparency Report which shows which governments ask us to take things down: http://www.google.com/transparencyreport/governmentrequests -- Ikai Lan Developer Programs Engineer, Google App Engine Blogger: http://googleappengine.blogspot.com Reddit: http://www.reddit.com/r/appengine Twitter: http://twitter.com/app_engine On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 6:30 AM, Jeff Schwartz jefftschwa...@gmail.com wrote: Freedom of speech is always a worthwhile subject and its defense is the ethical and moral obligation of every freedom loving individual but perhaps this is best discussed in a dedicated blog on the subject. On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 9:11 AM, nickmilon nickmi...@gmail.com wrote: Philip +1 Still I am not sure that G would surrender so easily as Amazon did, there is a precedence: G vs Lieberman story: http://googlepublicpolicy.blogspot.com/2008/05/dialogue-with-sen-lieb... when G stood to its values. By the way ... http://wikileaks.org/support.html doesn't work for me http://213.251.145.96/support.html is working (for the time been) On Dec 4, 3:15 pm, Philip philip.mates...@driggle.com wrote: It's sad that Amazon does not support customers that exercise the right of free speech. But I'd also assume that Google would not stand up against the us government for offending the first amendment. :-( However, I will still donate to Wikileaks and I would suggest anyone else to do the same:http://wikileaks.org/support.html Our liberty depends on the freedom of the press, and that cannot be limited without being lost. Thomas Jefferson If the freedom of speech is taken away then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter. George Washington On Dec 4, 1:34 am, supercobra superco...@gmail.com wrote: Amazon and Google have been long-time partisans of freedom of speech. However in this case, the pressure coming from the government must be incredible. Amazon is not the only victim of these intimidations. US government employees have been forbidden to visit Wikileaks sites and to discuss these matters on Facebook. At least one US university has been 'persuaded' to ask their students not to reference any Wikileaks documents in their research papers... (how is that for doing thorough research!). Even crounties bend under US pressure. We have seen it to be the case with Spain Germany which dropped their lawsuits, investigations and enforcement of arrest warrants for torture and kidnappings (renditions) after the US pressured them (source Wikileaks cables). So I would assume that Google or any organization would probably comply as well. To ensure free speech can not be prevented by taking down web sites, we need to create a totally distributed website hosting technology based on BitTorrent or something similar. Happy coding. ;-) Daniel Guermeur -- superco...@gmail.com
