[google-appengine] Re: many "server error" responded in the past hour

2012-02-26 Thread Tapir 
About 30% visits will encounter cold startup.
Why AppEngine doesn't triy to use the resident instance but often try
to create a new instance to handle new visits?

This problem doesn't happen before, but it is serious today.

On Feb 27, 2:31 pm, Tapir  wrote:
> Many such logs:
>
> A serious problem was encountered with the process that handled this
> request, causing it to exit. This is likely to cause a new process to
> be used for the next request to your application. If you see this
> message frequently, you may be throwing exceptions during the
> initialization of your application. (Error code 104)
>
> There are 2 instances running for about one hour:
> 0.000   0.0 ms  30      1       0:43:54         98.5 MBytes     Resident Icon 
> Resident
> 0.000   0.0 ms  10      0       1:25:04         95.1 MBytes     Dynamic Icon 
> Dynamic
>
> The visits of my app is very small, about one pageview/minute.
> The 2 running instances are idle at most time.
> But AppEngine still often tries to create a third one even if the 2
> running ones are idle so that there are many long-time instance
> startups.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.

[google-appengine] Re: AppEngine 1.6.2 and GPE

2012-02-26 Thread Sriram 
Hi Brian,
Thanks for pointing out the flaw. Currently GPE manually bundles the App 
Engine SDK - we are working on making this dynamic so that the latest App 
Engine SDKs are always available through GPE. I will ping again once the 
new SDK is in the latest GPE.

Thanks again,
Sriram

On Tuesday, 21 February 2012 04:11:07 UTC+5:30, Brian Tosch wrote:
>
> Unless I'm missing something AppEngine 1.6.2 was never pushed to Google 
> Plugin for Eclipse?
>
> I would just like to know if I should expect GPE to be a maintained 
> distribution channel.  Its not a big deal if there is a few days delay, but 
> if its not going to be pushed regularly then I will switch to downloaded it 
> manually.
>

On Tuesday, 21 February 2012 04:11:07 UTC+5:30, Brian Tosch wrote:
>
> Unless I'm missing something AppEngine 1.6.2 was never pushed to Google 
> Plugin for Eclipse?
>
> I would just like to know if I should expect GPE to be a maintained 
> distribution channel.  Its not a big deal if there is a few days delay, but 
> if its not going to be pushed regularly then I will switch to downloaded it 
> manually.
>

On Tuesday, 21 February 2012 04:11:07 UTC+5:30, Brian Tosch wrote:
>
> Unless I'm missing something AppEngine 1.6.2 was never pushed to Google 
> Plugin for Eclipse?
>
> I would just like to know if I should expect GPE to be a maintained 
> distribution channel.  Its not a big deal if there is a few days delay, but 
> if its not going to be pushed regularly then I will switch to downloaded it 
> manually.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google App Engine" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/mFWOSc3IowMJ.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.

[google-appengine] Re: many "server error" responded in the past hour

2012-02-26 Thread Tapir 
It is intolerable, especially for a paid app.

On Feb 27, 2:31 pm, Tapir  wrote:
> Many such logs:
>
> A serious problem was encountered with the process that handled this
> request, causing it to exit. This is likely to cause a new process to
> be used for the next request to your application. If you see this
> message frequently, you may be throwing exceptions during the
> initialization of your application. (Error code 104)
>
> There are 2 instances running for about one hour:
> 0.000   0.0 ms  30      1       0:43:54         98.5 MBytes     Resident Icon 
> Resident
> 0.000   0.0 ms  10      0       1:25:04         95.1 MBytes     Dynamic Icon 
> Dynamic
>
> The visits of my app is very small, about one pageview/minute.
> The 2 running instances are idle at most time.
> But AppEngine still often tries to create a third one even if the 2
> running ones are idle so that there are many long-time instance
> startups.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.

[google-appengine] many "server error" responded in the past hour

2012-02-26 Thread Tapir 
Many such logs:

A serious problem was encountered with the process that handled this
request, causing it to exit. This is likely to cause a new process to
be used for the next request to your application. If you see this
message frequently, you may be throwing exceptions during the
initialization of your application. (Error code 104)

There are 2 instances running for about one hour:
0.000   0.0 ms  30  1   0:43:54 98.5 MBytes Resident Icon 
Resident
0.000   0.0 ms  10  0   1:25:04 95.1 MBytes Dynamic Icon 
Dynamic

The visits of my app is very small, about one pageview/minute.
The 2 running instances are idle at most time.
But AppEngine still often tries to create a third one even if the 2
running ones are idle so that there are many long-time instance
startups.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.

Re: [google-appengine] Thought : Request Queue Management in Google app Engine

2012-02-26 Thread Robert Kluin 
This is related to what the pending request latency controls adjust in
your application's settings.  If you turn the min-pending latency up,
it will be more resistant to spinning up instances.  Turn the max
pending latency down, more willing to spin up instances.  You'll need
to experiment to figure out what works for you since, as Gopal said,
they don't disclose the exact algorithms used.


Robert





On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 03:37, pradeep  wrote:
> Hi Google guys,
>
> I have some thought in the Request Queue Management
>
>  * any of the first call takes more time to server and if the age of
> instance increases then it serving fast,
>
> Like we can do the prior detection of the queue and serving level ,
> the instance can be created and loaded the app in to instance  after
> few seconds (consider 30 secs/60 secs) then if we add that instance
> for serving all the call will take less time so that the we can have
> the throughput of the server will be high
>
> If I was wrong please correct me
>
> please let me know where I can find some more information of the
> documentation for how the request queue is managed.
>
> Thanks
> Krishnan
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Google App Engine" group.
> To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Entities Dissappeared in Datastore Admin after "Copy to another app"

2012-02-26 Thread Robert Kluin 
Goto the billing settings page of your app.  Change the setting there.


Robert





On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 06:52, Sacha Vieux-Roy  wrote:
> How do I so this?
>
> On Feb 24, 12:41 am, Robert Kluin  wrote:
>> HiSacha,
>>   It sounds like you may want to increase your quota in order to
>> finish the copy.  Or, throttle the copy so it isn't burning your quota
>> so fast.  The other issues are all due to running out of quota.
>>
>> Robert
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 02:08,SachaVieux-Roy
>>
>>  wrote:
>> > Yes, I am hitting a quota.  The entities showing up in the other app.
>>
>> > I tried to recover the entities using GAE Datastore Backup Utility but got
>> > quota errors.
>>
>> > Can you help?
>>
>> > attached command output.
>>
>> > --
>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> > "Google App Engine" group.
>> > To view this discussion on the web visit
>> >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/WJbhQvM3YUwJ.
>>
>> > To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
>> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> > google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> > For more options, visit this group at
>> >http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Google App Engine" group.
> To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.

RE: [google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine community support is moving to Stack Overflow

2012-02-26 Thread Brandon Wirtz 
> AdWords communities (6 languages) also just moved to a 3rd party platform:


That's an SEO play. Adwords is tired of all the trash talked about them in
their forum ranking so highly because it is hosted on a Google Domain. 



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.

[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine community support is moving to Stack Overflow

2012-02-26 Thread Purmou 
All right! Start rolling in the herds.

Stack Overflow is an excellent community of highly dedicated programmers. 
You are very likely to get an answer to most of your questions *within a 
few hours*. There is such a powerful sense of friendliness on the site, 
which I think is valuable camaraderie among fellow programmers.

I believe you will all enjoy your time on Stack Overflow!

On Monday, February 6, 2012 6:14:54 PM UTC-8, Ikai Lan wrote:
>
> *Hi App Engine Developers,
>
> In the last few years, the Q&A website Stack 
> Overflowhas become an invaluable tool for 
> developer communities. We’re pleased to 
> announce that we are migrating to Stack Overflow as the official channel 
> for answering development questions about Google App Engine.The 
> google-appengine  group 
> will remain open for general discussions and announcements that are better 
> suited for the groups format.
>
> We believe that Stack Overflow is better platform for sharing knowledge 
> and answering support questions given its larger community, de-duping of 
> similar questions and contributor reputation system. We also expect that 
> App Engine developers will be able to contribute and benefit from the wider 
> range of language-related information not specific to App Engine. In 
> addition, due to Stack Overflow’s use of OpenID for account management, 
> developers will not need to create a new account to participate in the 
> discussion - developers will be able to log in with any of the identity 
> providers supported by Stack Overflow, including Google Accounts.
>
> We plan on deprecating the App Engine language-specific groups, namely 
> google-appengine-pythonand
>  
> google-appengine-java. 
> The 
> google-appengine-godiscussion
>  group will continue to remain open for at least as long as the 
> Go runtime is in experimental status. 
>
> The Python and Java groups will be placed into read-only on March 5th, 
> 2012. While answering technical questions, we will begin nudging developers 
> to ask their questions on Stack Overflow using the google-app-engine 
> tag
> .
>
> Please let us know if there are any questions or concerns about this 
> announcement.
>
> Happy coding!
>
> - Ikai Lan, on behalf of the App Engine team*
>

On Monday, February 6, 2012 6:14:54 PM UTC-8, Ikai Lan wrote:
>
> *Hi App Engine Developers,
>
> In the last few years, the Q&A website Stack 
> Overflowhas become an invaluable tool for 
> developer communities. We’re pleased to 
> announce that we are migrating to Stack Overflow as the official channel 
> for answering development questions about Google App Engine.The 
> google-appengine  group 
> will remain open for general discussions and announcements that are better 
> suited for the groups format.
>
> We believe that Stack Overflow is better platform for sharing knowledge 
> and answering support questions given its larger community, de-duping of 
> similar questions and contributor reputation system. We also expect that 
> App Engine developers will be able to contribute and benefit from the wider 
> range of language-related information not specific to App Engine. In 
> addition, due to Stack Overflow’s use of OpenID for account management, 
> developers will not need to create a new account to participate in the 
> discussion - developers will be able to log in with any of the identity 
> providers supported by Stack Overflow, including Google Accounts.
>
> We plan on deprecating the App Engine language-specific groups, namely 
> google-appengine-pythonand
>  
> google-appengine-java. 
> The 
> google-appengine-godiscussion
>  group will continue to remain open for at least as long as the 
> Go runtime is in experimental status. 
>
> The Python and Java groups will be placed into read-only on March 5th, 
> 2012. While answering technical questions, we will begin nudging developers 
> to ask their questions on Stack Overflow using the google-app-engine 
> tag
> .
>
> Please let us know if there are any questions or concerns about this 
> announcement.
>
> Happy coding!
>
> - Ikai Lan, on behalf of the App Engine team*
>

On Monday, February 6, 2012 6:14:54 PM UTC-8, Ikai Lan wrote:
>
> *Hi App Engine Developers,
>
> In the last few years, the Q&A website Stack 
> Overflowhas become an invaluable tool for 
> developer communitie

[google-appengine] Re: Email when quota is reached?

2012-02-26 Thread sb 
Writing a small app shouldn't be too hard.

How long between checks do you think is good? Every 2 hours?

On Feb 25, 7:27 pm, "Felix E. Klee"  wrote:
> Any idea how to set up App Engine so that I get an email when quota is
> reached and users cannot access an app anymore?
>
> That would allow me to set up billing only when required. Currently, I
> have various small projects on App Engine of varying popularity, and I
> am not interested in paying up to 90 USD in fees *per month* just to
> have billing always enabled.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.

[google-appengine] Re: What are the rules for sending email through an application

2012-02-26 Thread stephenp 
Is i...@nextgreatstartup.com an administrator in the appengine console for 
"myapp"? You should see it listed under "Permissions" on the AppEngine 
console. 

If you don't see the email, you can use the form at the bottom of the 
Permissions page to send an invitation to i...@nextgreatstartup.com. Once 
that user accepts the invitation, you'll be able to send emails with that 
from address.

Stephen



On Friday, February 24, 2012 8:03:16 PM UTC-6, mikaye wrote:
>
> Previously, I had sent emails in my GAE appplication through my own 
> account. This works fine. 
>
> e.g. myapp.appspot.com 
>
> I'm working with a 3rd party and have updated their site so their 
> domain, http://www.nextgreatstartup.com, points to myapp.appspot.com 
> by adding it as a service to their GAE apps aacount. So far, so good. 
>
> I added a new user to their GAE apps account, 
>
> e.g. i...@nextgreatstartup.com 
>
> I updated the app to send emails through this user. 
>
> I don't see any error messages in the app logs nor do I receive any 
> emails sent from the app. 
>
> Any idea what I'm doing wrong? 
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google App Engine" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/ghrksA3C3YUJ.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.

[google-appengine] App Engine Admin Console Feedback

2012-02-26 Thread doogle 
If you have trouble viewing or submitting this form, you can fill it out  
online:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/viewform?formkey=dGJSVGRELXdGNDlSM3FHRnh2RWlJSEE6MQ


App Engine Admin Console Feedback


Here on the App Engine team, we're taking some time to consider how to  
improve the Admin Console for our users. This survey should take about 5 -  
10 minutes. Please let us know what you think about the current console,  
which is hosted at https://appengine.google.com.



How happy are you with the current Admin Console  
(https://appengine.google.com)? *


1 2 3 4 5

unhappy happy


Do you also use the Google APIs Console  
(https://code.google.com/apis/console)? *


Yes
No


If you use Google APIs Console, what do you use it for?



What do you think are the strengths of the current Admin Console?



What do you think could be improved about the Admin Console? What features  
would you add?




Any other comments?



Powered by Google Docs Report Abuse - Terms of Service - Additional Terms


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google 
App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.

[google-appengine] Unable to create entity on Google App Engine Datastore

2012-02-26 Thread ani 
Hello, I’m trying to connect an android application with Google app
engine. I am using Google App Engine Datastore as my “database”. The
problem is that I am having difficulties in building entities on the
GAE datastore.

I’m using JDO to create my entity and I am following the same code
pattern as on code.google.com
(http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/java/datastore/jdo/
dataclasses.html).

The whole thing runs without error but when I open it on Datastore
viewer at http://localhost:/_ah/admin, where I’m suppose to see
all my entities, none of them are being displayed. Instead I’m
receiving the following message:
“Datastore has no entities in the Empty namespace. You need to add
data programmatically before you can use this tool to view and edit
it.”

I even tried to store a simple data object in the datastore for the
entity I created, but it does not work, so I am confusing whether the
entity has been created or not.
(http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/java/datastore/jdo/
creatinggettinganddeletingdata.html)

Below is my Entity Category

import javax.jdo.annotations.IdentityType;
import javax.jdo.annotations.IdGeneratorStrategy;
import javax.jdo.annotations.PersistenceCapable;
import javax.jdo.annotations.Persistent;
import javax.jdo.annotations.PrimaryKey;


@PersistenceCapable(identityType = IdentityType.APPLICATION)
public class Category{

 @PrimaryKey
 @Persistent(valueStrategy = IdGeneratorStrategy.IDENTITY)
 Long id;
 @Persistent
 private String ccode;
 @Persistent
 private String cname;

 public Category(String ccode, String cname){
 this.ccode = ccode;
 this.cname = cname;
 }

 public Long getID() {
return id;
}
 public void setID(Long id) {
this.id = id;
}
 public String getCcode() {
return ccode;
}
 public void setCode(String ccode) {
this.ccode = ccode;
}
 public String getCname() {
return cname;
}
 public void setCname(String cname) {
this.cname = cname;
}

}

Here i"m trying to add an object data in Entity category

Class PMF
import javax.jdo.JDOHelper;
import javax.jdo.PersistenceManagerFactory;
import javax.jdo.PersistenceManager;
import com.google.appengine.api.datastore.Key;
import com.google.appengine.api.datastore.KeyFactory;
import our.fy.project.Category;

public final class PMF {
private static final PersistenceManagerFactory pmfInstance =
JDOHelper.getPersistenceManagerFactory("transactions-
optional");
private PMF() {}
public static PersistenceManagerFactory
getPersistenceManagerFactory() {
return pmfInstance;
}
public void addCategory(Category c) {
PersistenceManager pm =
getPersistenceManagerFactory().getPersistenceManager();
 c = new Category("abc","xyz");
Key key =
KeyFactory.createKey(Category.class.getSimpleName(), "011");

c.setKey(key);

try {
pm.makePersistent(c);
} finally {
pm.close();
}
}


Can anyone help, whether I am missing something or not? Thanks.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.

[google-appengine] Python 2.7 Instance problems today ?

2012-02-26 Thread Mind 
My app serves queries to control a free Android multiplayer game.  QPS
is normally around 1/sec.  Responses are typically around 1k or less
of JSON data.  Login, get game data, post score, etc

This morning, I went from the normal 1-2 instances to 10+ instances
(which I am being charged for!).  Latency is also up to 120 seconds
(but only 1 instance ?!?) according to the dashboard.

I have 8 instances with 0 QPS and 0 latency sitting around doing doing
nothing but being billed for.

Did someone break something ?

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.

[google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine community support is moving to Stack Overflow

2012-02-26 Thread Switch 
AdWords communities (6 languages) also just moved to a 3rd party platform:

www.en.adwords-community.com
www.de.adwords-community.com
etc.

Switch

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google App Engine" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/9EGVsqGXk-AJ.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.

[google-appengine] My app started crashing with "AddAppVersion failed: CLIENT_ERROR"

2012-02-26 Thread Kimoon Kim 
Hello,

My app, srpackerz, started crashing ~12:00 am this morning. Going to
this URL, 
http://srpackerz.prom.corp.google.com/redirect?url=http://tbus14:25641/packerz?authenticated,
always shows the following error page:

AddAppVersion failed: CLIENT_ERROR

Running on icyt5:4249 statusz INFO

I ran out of clue. This happened one day after I announced it to a
community of engineers. Maybe quota? How should I troubleshoot?

Thanks,
Kimoon

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.

[google-appengine] Re: Getting Access-Control-Allow-Origin header for images stored in Appengine Blobstore for use in canvas tag.

2012-02-26 Thread Joseph Letness 
Hi Vinuth,

I think the only way to do this right now would be to forgo the
getServingUrl method from the Blobstore Images API and generate a
private url of the image within your app.  Much in the same way that
you would serve a non-image blobstore entity such as a .zip or some
other binary.

However, there are drawbacks: If you rely on the sizing and cropping
arguments (that append to the API generated url) to render you images,
you will need to build your own functionality for storing and serving
de-normalized results from the transformations.  Also, your app will
incur the overhead for both a request as well as a few RPCs for each
image served, which can add up if you are displaying many thumbnails
on a single page which can noticeably impact latency and/or force your
app to scale up more resources.

On the other hand, it does allow for setting the headers any way you
want, rendering readable urls (which *some* SEO auditors consider
critical), as well as giving a mechanism for monitoring the usage of
each image asset.  That last part is helpful if you don't want some
user consuming your apps bandwidth for their own CDN purposes, since
AFAIK, GAE does not have any specific logging for individual Blobstore
images served. (If it can, someone please let me know ;)

Maybe this will fit your use case, good luck!

--Joe

On Feb 25, 3:49 am, Vinuth Madinur  wrote:
> Had posted this on Stackoverflow, since I didn't see any response there,
> retrying to start the conversation here.
>
> I hit upon this problem while trying to display image in a canvas to fetch
> it's color properties. However, since the image from blobstore is served
> from a different domain, the canvas gets tainted. Is there a workaround for
> this problem? Shouldn't blobstore be sending the
> Access-Control-Allow-Origin header based on the requesting domain and
> whether the domain owns the content?

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.

[google-appengine] Re: Email when quota is reached?

2012-02-26 Thread Emanuele Ziglioli 
Good idea, also I'd like to know whether there's a way to keep some
services running, regardless (we might miss important e-mails when the
service is offline, and we wouldn't know).

On Feb 26, 1:27 pm, "Felix E. Klee"  wrote:
> Any idea how to set up App Engine so that I get an email when quota is
> reached and users cannot access an app anymore?
>
> That would allow me to set up billing only when required. Currently, I
> have various small projects on App Engine of varying popularity, and I
> am not interested in paying up to 90 USD in fees *per month* just to
> have billing always enabled.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.