[google-appengine] GAE BigQuery
One of the issues of the datastore is a lack of SQL-like aggregates, or easy ad-hoc queries in general. This adds a lot of cost to reporting, dashboards, etc. Is BigQuery the default choice for this type of work, now? For those who have used it, what kinds of things should we watch out for? What types of result do you cache back in the datastore, or do you just run all that from BigQuery? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/tb9HEW70DM4J. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Writing files to the blobstore : Future safe ?
Google ? Anyone ? ... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] GAE BigQuery
I don't personally believe there exist a default in this kind of work without giving any specifics but you should definitely try it. If you haven't seen it, here's a recent post related to your questions. You might find some answers there: http://googleappengine.blogspot.it/2012/10/streak-brings-crm-to-inbox-with-google.html The only feature that's not there and I'd love to see it being implemented, is existing rows/data updates. Currently you can only append to existing table. Other than that, BigQuery is really awesome for all sorts of adhoc data analysis, dashboards, charts, etc. -- alex On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 12:31 PM, Richard Watson richard.wat...@gmail.com wrote: One of the issues of the datastore is a lack of SQL-like aggregates, or easy ad-hoc queries in general. This adds a lot of cost to reporting, dashboards, etc. Is BigQuery the default choice for this type of work, now? For those who have used it, what kinds of things should we watch out for? What types of result do you cache back in the datastore, or do you just run all that from BigQuery? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/tb9HEW70DM4J. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] GAE BigQuery
Thanks, Alex, I saw that article and I've taken a look at their source. Good to see that people are using BQ, I'm just hoping to get some first-hand pros and cons from GAE devs. On Monday, October 15, 2012 2:58:49 PM UTC+2, alex wrote: I don't personally believe there exist a default in this kind of work without giving any specifics but you should definitely try it. If you haven't seen it, here's a recent post related to your questions. You might find some answers there: http://googleappengine.blogspot.it/2012/10/streak-brings-crm-to-inbox-with-google.html The only feature that's not there and I'd love to see it being implemented, is existing rows/data updates. Currently you can only append to existing table. Other than that, BigQuery is really awesome for all sorts of adhoc data analysis, dashboards, charts, etc. -- alex On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 12:31 PM, Richard Watson richard...@gmail.com javascript: wrote: One of the issues of the datastore is a lack of SQL-like aggregates, or easy ad-hoc queries in general. This adds a lot of cost to reporting, dashboards, etc. Is BigQuery the default choice for this type of work, now? For those who have used it, what kinds of things should we watch out for? What types of result do you cache back in the datastore, or do you just run all that from BigQuery? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/tb9HEW70DM4J. To post to this group, send email to google-a...@googlegroups.comjavascript:. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengi...@googlegroups.com javascript:. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/G1vXEFPsdPMJ. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] unable to configure SSL to my custom domain in both SNI and VIP
I went through all the steps described here: http://support.google.com/a/bin/answer.py?hl=enanswer=2644386 - Certificate uploaded, - billing enabled, - CNAME changed. I tried both SNI and VIP and all I'm getting is this error page. 503. That’s an error. The service you requested is not available at this time. Service error -27. That’s all we know. After going over GAE's SSL instruction several times and searching through google for a while I am now out of guesses. Any insight will be appreciated. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/VA2PV--6GQoJ. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] JPO Entity vs Datastore Entity
Hello I am working on my first project and I am stuct. I need to know whats the difference between datastore.entity and javax.persistance.entity? Which one should I use? And also how to declare Entity as object I need it to better imagine my database pseudo model and also to work with data better. =) Thank you for help. =) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/XLBuoA-HpOAJ. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] Billed instance hours 3x dashboard instance hours
Hi Christian, Sorry we're still investigating. However, I'm fairly certain that this is a display bug of billing instance graph rather than overcharging, because the max idle instance settings is set to automatic for this app, which means the number of total instances should be the same as the number of billed instances. Of course, this display bug still sucks, but at least we don't think it's overcharging issue. Also, if you still see higher bills than before, I think it's worth investigating why, but this is another issue in my perspective. Do you still see any unreasonable higher bills? -- Takashi On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 12:47 AM, c h how...@umich.edu wrote: Are there any updates from the engineering team? It's been another week of overbilling. thanks, christian On Monday, October 8, 2012 8:33:27 PM UTC-7, c h wrote: Takashi, thanks! sorry if i was unclear before...there are indeed lots of moving parts to keep track of! let me know if the engineering team has anything to help me out. christian On Monday, October 8, 2012 7:50:30 PM UTC-7, Takashi Matsuo (Google) wrote: Hi Christian, First of all, I need to apologize that your issue if different from the one I mentioned. I'm escalating this to the engineering team. -- Takashi On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 10:45 AM, c h how...@umich.edu wrote: can you at least provide for me information about how the graph is wrong, how much it is wrong, and how to calculate what my expected charges should be until the issue is resolved? otherwise i expect to be billed at the lower rate that your charts and graphs show me. On Monday, October 8, 2012 6:36:03 PM UTC-7, Takashi Matsuo (Google) wrote: Sorry I should have been more clear. I think this issue is affecting only the graph. The billing amount should be still correct. If you feel differently, please consult our billing support team at: http://support.google.com/**code**/go/cloud_billinghttp://support.google.com/code/go/cloud_billing Thanks, On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 10:30 AM, c h how...@umich.edu wrote: What should i file as the bug? As far as i can tell google is overcharging us by 2x. This needs to be resolved immediately and ** retro**actively. I'll have our company finance officers get in touch with google billing to get this settled, and i'll file the bug. thank you, christian On Monday, October 8, 2012 6:25:07 PM UTC-7, Takashi Matsuo (Google) wrote: On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 10:16 AM, c h how...@umich.edu wrote: Takashi, So that means the what you show throughout the day for Frontend instance hours, and the graph of the number of instances currently is inaccurate? We are concerned because we made a change (disabled appstats) which seemed to decrease the number of hours we were using significantly, but the cost did not go down. When will the fix for the dashboard go into place? Our bill has nearly doubled since switching to python2.7 and we need to be able to optimize our application, but if we don't know what resources it is actually using we won't be able to find the right things to target. Sorry for the inconvenience. Can you file a bug on our issue tracker for tracking purpose? -- Takashi thanks, christian On Monday, October 8, 2012 6:10:04 PM UTC-7, Takashi Matsuo (Google) wrote: Hi Christian, Thanks for the info. We're aware of this issue in the graph, working on the fix. -- Takashi On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 5:37 AM, c h how...@umich.edu wrote: i sent my appid in on friday. it looks like over the weekend we are continuing to have this mis-match between hours in the console and hours then billed. am i reading something wrong? thanks, christian On Friday, October 5, 2012 12:43:09 PM UTC-7, c h wrote: Takashi, Thanks for the reply! I have some backends, but those are accounted under backend instance hours. nothing else hitting frontends. i just double checked the chart for all versions and it is what i sent. i did not do any backup/copy/delete tasks with Datastore Admin for several days now. nothing is hung there that i can see. i'd prefer to to send appid off the group...will do so in a moment. thanks! christian On Thursday, October 4, 2012 10:27:16 PM UTC-7, Takashi Matsuo (Google) wrote: Hi christian, Is the instance chart only for one version? Do you have any other version which runs some instances? Did you run any backup/copy/delete task with Datastore Admin? If the answers are no to all of above, please tell me your app-id. -- Takashi On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 8:34 AM, c h how...@umich.edu wrote: Hello, for the last few days i've been tracking instance hours on my app. when i look at the instance hours in the dashboard they are much smaller than the billed amount. yesterday at about 11:55pm (just before the reset) the dashboard showed me about 400 frontend instance hours used. My bill for yesterday shows over 1,000
Re: [google-appengine] My first project in GAE
Не только, еще пытаемся популяризировать технологии такие как gae, gwt, gxt On Sunday, October 14, 2012 9:16:15 PM UTC+4, Rekby wrote: Спамчик? :) My first project in GAE: http://www.rfrate.com/. The site provides information on exchange rates in Russia. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/3iyxMvOp7t0J. To post to this group, send email to google-a...@googlegroups.comjavascript: . To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengi...@googlegroups.com javascript:. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/b7QJgUsmJsAJ. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] unable to configure SSL to my custom domain in both SNI and VIP
Hi taelimoh, I have few questions for you. * Have you already configured your custom domain for your application? * Is your domain a primary domain or a non-primary domain? * Can you explain about the exact steps before you saw that error? Thanks, -- Takashi On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 8:02 PM, taelimoh gl...@gluwa.com wrote: I went through all the steps described here: http://support.google.com/a/bin/answer.py?hl=enanswer=2644386 - Certificate uploaded, - billing enabled, - CNAME changed. I tried both SNI and VIP and all I'm getting is this error page. 503. That’s an error. The service you requested is not available at this time. Service error -27. That’s all we know. After going over GAE's SSL instruction several times and searching through google for a while I am now out of guesses. Any insight will be appreciated. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/VA2PV--6GQoJ. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- Takashi Matsuo | Developers Advocate | tmat...@google.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Migrating to the HRD - where is the View Migration Tool ??
Hi All! I'm trying to migrate one of my applications (code application and data) to other GAE domain. I am following the steps described in this google guide - https://developers.google.com/appengine/docs/adminconsole/migration but in the step Using the Migration Tool i need to open the View Migration Tool supposedly located in *Application Settings* *View Migration Tool. *But there i can't find the View Migration Tool. Has it been moved elsewhere? I've seen the follow post ( https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!searchin/google-appengine/View$20Migration$20Tool/google-appengine/Pj928t1gFzw/Aw91rElHFqwJ) but i neither can't open the migration tool using the URL https://appengine.google.com/migrating?app_id=APPID does anybody know where is the problem?? am i following the properly gide to migrate my application? thanks in advance for your help!! Abraham -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/EtF9DJkjjIUJ. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] Billed instance hours 3x dashboard instance hours
Thanks for the update. Yes, i do see unreasonably high bills. starting on the day that i first contacted google we changed our app to stop using appstats, and saw a significant decrease in the number of instance hours used both in the graph and in the daily totals from the dashboard. we were shocked to find that when we were billed we were still being billed almost exactly the same number of instance hours as before. We are still seeing a 50-70% increase from the number of frontend instance hours reported on our dashboard as we approach midnight PDT to what shows in the daily bill. The other difficulty stems from the simple fact that Google is not charging me based on the services i actually use. All data that i have access to says I'm using instance hours at one rate, and I'm being charged for some phantom hours. Not only is this bad customer service, but in most places it is against the law. If there is indeed a bug in the system (and bugs do happen), we need either full disclosure of the bug so that we can budget our costs appropriately, or we need to be charged at a rate that matches the usage that is being reported to us. thanks, christian On Monday, October 15, 2012 8:20:37 AM UTC-7, Takashi Matsuo (Google) wrote: Hi Christian, Sorry we're still investigating. However, I'm fairly certain that this is a display bug of billing instance graph rather than overcharging, because the max idle instance settings is set to automatic for this app, which means the number of total instances should be the same as the number of billed instances. Of course, this display bug still sucks, but at least we don't think it's overcharging issue. Also, if you still see higher bills than before, I think it's worth investigating why, but this is another issue in my perspective. Do you still see any unreasonable higher bills? -- Takashi On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 12:47 AM, c h how...@umich.edu javascript:wrote: Are there any updates from the engineering team? It's been another week of overbilling. thanks, christian On Monday, October 8, 2012 8:33:27 PM UTC-7, c h wrote: Takashi, thanks! sorry if i was unclear before...there are indeed lots of moving parts to keep track of! let me know if the engineering team has anything to help me out. christian On Monday, October 8, 2012 7:50:30 PM UTC-7, Takashi Matsuo (Google) wrote: Hi Christian, First of all, I need to apologize that your issue if different from the one I mentioned. I'm escalating this to the engineering team. -- Takashi On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 10:45 AM, c h how...@umich.edu wrote: can you at least provide for me information about how the graph is wrong, how much it is wrong, and how to calculate what my expected charges should be until the issue is resolved? otherwise i expect to be billed at the lower rate that your charts and graphs show me. On Monday, October 8, 2012 6:36:03 PM UTC-7, Takashi Matsuo (Google) wrote: Sorry I should have been more clear. I think this issue is affecting only the graph. The billing amount should be still correct. If you feel differently, please consult our billing support team at: http://support.google.com/**code**/go/cloud_billinghttp://support.google.com/code/go/cloud_billing Thanks, On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 10:30 AM, c h how...@umich.edu wrote: What should i file as the bug? As far as i can tell google is overcharging us by 2x. This needs to be resolved immediately and ** retro**actively. I'll have our company finance officers get in touch with google billing to get this settled, and i'll file the bug. thank you, christian On Monday, October 8, 2012 6:25:07 PM UTC-7, Takashi Matsuo (Google) wrote: On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 10:16 AM, c h how...@umich.edu wrote: Takashi, So that means the what you show throughout the day for Frontend instance hours, and the graph of the number of instances currently is inaccurate? We are concerned because we made a change (disabled appstats) which seemed to decrease the number of hours we were using significantly, but the cost did not go down. When will the fix for the dashboard go into place? Our bill has nearly doubled since switching to python2.7 and we need to be able to optimize our application, but if we don't know what resources it is actually using we won't be able to find the right things to target. Sorry for the inconvenience. Can you file a bug on our issue tracker for tracking purpose? -- Takashi thanks, christian On Monday, October 8, 2012 6:10:04 PM UTC-7, Takashi Matsuo (Google) wrote: Hi Christian, Thanks for the info. We're aware of this issue in the graph, working on the fix. -- Takashi On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 5:37 AM, c h how...@umich.edu wrote: i sent my appid in on friday. it looks like over the weekend we are continuing to have this mis-match between hours in the console and
Re: [google-appengine] Re: Writing files to the blobstore : Future safe ?
Hi All, We are still actively developing the experimental Files API, and you should see some improvements in stability coming releases. Thanks, Christina, PM for the Files API On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 3:59 AM, Mahron gan...@xehon.com wrote: Google ? Anyone ? ... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- Christina Ilvento | Google App Engine | cilve...@google.com | (650)-201-9399 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] calling a task from a callback in java
I have an object that fires a callback after a put. The callback then fires a task to do somethings. For some reason, that task then fires the same callback again, resulting in an infinite loop. I verified that my task is not putting that object, so the loop shouldn't be happening. Any ideas? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/RArN09oxqrAJ. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] javax.servlet.UnavailableException: Initialization failed after High Replication Datastore Migration in Google App Engine app
Hi there, I just migrated my GAE app to the High Replication Datastore, but it seems I'm getting an initialization error. My app is using Maven (Java) and it is not leveraging on the DataStore (just using a couple of controllers and views using Apache Tiles). To migrate, I duplicated myapp, I launched /Applications/appengine-java-sdk-1.7.2.1/bin/appcfg.sh update ./src/main/webapp/ after modifying the appengine-web.xml file (changing the id to 'myapp-hrd'), and I used the migration tool to migrate to myapp-hrd. I tried to redeploy the app using the previous command, but I'm getting a 500 error in the front-end. Looking at the logs, I get: EXCEPTION java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.tuckey.web.filters.urlrewrite.UrlRewriteFilter at com.google.appengine.runtime.Request.process-9aa0065f4d866794(Request.java) at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:266) at org.mortbay.util.Loader.loadClass(Loader.java:91) at org.mortbay.util.Loader.loadClass(Loader.java:71) ... Uncaught exception from servlet javax.servlet.UnavailableException: Initialization failed. at com.google.apphosting.runtime.jetty.AppVersionHandlerMap.createHandler(AppVersionHandlerMap.java:228) at com.google.apphosting.runtime.jetty.AppVersionHandlerMap.getHandler(AppVersionHandlerMap.java:194) I use the UrlRewriteFilter, and its dependency is declared in my POM file. Also if I launch my app, using mvn gae:run I can clearly see my app working. Please help on that, it is quite urgent Cheers, -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/ii9E10kZaJEJ. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Error deploying Maven app on migrated Google App Engine
Hi there, After I migrated my app (Java) onto the High Replication DataStore, I was trying to deploy it using the command I used to adopt before for deployment mvn test gae:deploy but now I'm getting this kind of error: Oct 16, 2012 7:03:04 AM org.apache.jasper.JspC processFile INFO: Built File: /error.jsp Oct 16, 2012 7:03:05 AM org.apache.jasper.JspC processFile INFO: Built File: /WEB-INF/tiles/contact-sidebar.jsp Any help on this one? Cheers, Sebastiano -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/tr_RnXzmqL8J. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Appengine mail api, html email and data uri
Hi, I am trying to use data URI, to create an email newsletter: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_URI_scheme The images are missing when they arrive to my google mail box. Source of email is looking like this: Delivered-To: radomir.pol...@usetreno.cz Received: by 10.114.14.97 with SMTP id o1csp206521ldc; Mon, 15 Oct 2012 09:36:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.137.112 with SMTP id x76mr10881005yhi.56.1350318996467; Mon, 15 Oct 2012 09:36:36 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: 3kzt8uaojdoq20m1zmvwk7ouiqt.kwuzilwuqz.xwtikp20m1zmvw...@m3kw2wvrgufz5godrsrytgd7.apphosting.bounces.google.com Received: from mail-gg0-f199.google.com (mail-gg0-f199.google.com [209.85.161.199]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h3si6537605anp.85.2012.10.15.09.36.36 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 15 Oct 2012 09:36:36 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of 3kzt8uaojdoq20m1zmvwk7ouiqt.kwuzilwuqz.xwtikp20m1zmvw...@m3kw2wvrgufz5godrsrytgd7.apphosting.bounces.google.com designates 209.85.161.199 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.161.199; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of 3kzt8uaojdoq20m1zmvwk7ouiqt.kwuzilwuqz.xwtikp20m1zmvw...@m3kw2wvrgufz5godrsrytgd7.apphosting.bounces.google.com designates 209.85.161.199 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=3kzt8uaojdoq20m1zmvwk7ouiqt.kwuzilwuqz.xwtikp20m1zmvw...@m3kw2wvrgufz5godrsrytgd7.apphosting.bounces.google.com Received: by mail-gg0-f199.google.com with SMTP id f1so9174377ggn.2 for radomir.pol...@usetreno.cz; Mon, 15 Oct 2012 09:36:36 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.59.5.193 with SMTP id co1mr2562119ved.37.1350318995789; Mon, 15 Oct 2012 09:36:35 -0700 (PDT) Reply-To: =?UTF-8?Q?Radom=C3=ADr_Pol=C3=A1ch?= radomir.pol...@usetreno.cz X-Google-Appengine-App-Id: s~usetrenocz Message-ID: 047d7b6d8b0a13d76304cc1ba...@google.com Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 16:36:35 + Subject: Test From: =?UTF-8?Q?Radom=C3=ADr_Pol=C3=A1ch?= radomir.pol...@usetreno.cz To: =?UTF-8?Q?Radom=C3=ADr_Pol=C3=A1ch?= radomir.pol...@usetreno.cz Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b6d8b0a13d74c04cc1ba457 --047d7b6d8b0a13d74c04cc1ba457 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed; delsp=yes Alt --047d7b6d8b0a13d74c04cc1ba457 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable !DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN html head meta http-equiv=3Dcontent-type content=3Dtext/html; charset=3Dutf-8= / titleNewsletter U=B9et=F8eno.cz/title /head body img src=3D AYf8/9hGXRFWHRTb2Z0d2FyZQBBZG9iZSBJbWFnZVJlYWR5ccllPqhJREFUOBEF= wbuLXGUYwOHf+37fnLnt7Oy6u16IVjYSt4iYRktJsYL4P4iNYq1YGAx2WlkYbEVBtLG3lUiIKCg= ENirimGBg4+zuXPbM+c75Lq/PI0fvf/zha++8e2O1rtmkRCxGMVCBvlMEMAAMDAwYeMfO9oTvv/= j8U/nkeNWdtbH3aBPJGFd2BxxOK+5vErfnARUQAMAADLIZ+wPPwWSEDyn25k2ks8IrT4x449kpD= XANuDRyfPvPBZUKBoCBgALzENnqJ7RNmYQBcO2pEfMCDzrjfoKX94cMvZDMKBhNNrpiFDMy0OWE= z1YAcApehIsMywxtMZ4eKDcO9ygAZvxdR76araiTIUAuhp+tak46Y+g9xYwINAbR4Lg1Rs5hQGt= wZd/TU+H6byeElGlzh8/Aooucd5FYChcZziJ4gUfREAwDosF5Ui5veZZdxyZlDoYe71WonMMAEa= HJsExGX4ypEwAAKoHnBnDvtKMzoe89zileVXGqIIIihFxYx0K/J7w6VQAAAO6cNnx0PKfvHYLhV= PEqgnOKIKjAJhvrZAwFQgEVAMCM7Z7yWN9zkQzFcCp4VcWJkYFohhiso5GLcfNhBAAgGxztVVy/= vM9bv5wgZqgoqiI4FTLC7dOWl6aOZMZJW5iFzCxkZiHzV5P5cZG4NPRMKoeooCJ4J4KqMnbCN//= WvLA74L1nKm4tM+tkqIAZIHC057lzFthk8KqoCr7yju1KWEWjM/jg3oLXnxxxdadiNFYAMCgYt/= 5r+PJBjVdh4pSBd8ib3/3w8+7h1RfndaAFnCoJpXKOnlMQMDNyKbSp4KzQF+NgPOTsj7u/u8fr+= U+Dnb3nh8r2VrPsxs0qTMMqTMIybDXLsNUsw3hzHkb1Ikw2yzDaLNreZtXUf9799eHXn739PxaJ= ZJHkea9sAElFTkSuQmCC width=3D16 height=3D16 img src=3D AAAFCAYAAACNbyblHElEQVQI12P4//8/w38GIAXDIBKE0DHxgljNBAAO 9TXL0Y4OHwBJRU5ErkJggg=3D=3D alt=3DRed dot img src=3D3Dcid:B06@goomoji.gmail style=3D3Dmargin: 0px 0.2ex; = vertical-ali=3D gn: middle; goomoji=3D3DB06br clear=3D3Dalldivbr/div= -- brp st=3D yle=3D3Dcolor:rgb(80,0,80);font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:= 13px;backg=3D round-color:rgb(255,255,255) /body /html --047d7b6d8b0a13d74c04cc1ba457-- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/9kbrtis38lUJ. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at
[google-appengine] Re: 1.7.2 Pre-release SDKs Available
*Wha*t* is the meaning of 'Search API now has a string maximum length limit of 2000 characters'? Is that* mean search API can only index text/string up to 2000 characters? What will happen when I feed a string with 2001 characters in Java SDK? throw exception or search API will ignore characters since index 2000? I've visited the 'Overview' and 'Java Reference' and see https://developers.google.com/appengine/docs/java/javadoc/com/google/appengine/api/search/checkers/FieldChecker#MAXIMUM_TEXT_LENGTH it stated 1048576 bytes, this means it is updated from 1048576 to 2000? Thanks. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/nqMvL6SdPFYJ. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] Billed instance hours 3x dashboard instance hours
looking again at my instances graph, over the weekend i would have had to have 37-40 instances on all day to run up the number of instance hours i was billed for, but even unbilled instances in the graph is not that high (it peaks there, but it is not sustained that high). we need to have this fixed ASAP so that we can predict our costs and understand how app changes change our cost. thanks, christian On Monday, October 15, 2012 10:46:32 AM UTC-7, c h wrote: Thanks for the update. Yes, i do see unreasonably high bills. starting on the day that i first contacted google we changed our app to stop using appstats, and saw a significant decrease in the number of instance hours used both in the graph and in the daily totals from the dashboard. we were shocked to find that when we were billed we were still being billed almost exactly the same number of instance hours as before. We are still seeing a 50-70% increase from the number of frontend instance hours reported on our dashboard as we approach midnight PDT to what shows in the daily bill. The other difficulty stems from the simple fact that Google is not charging me based on the services i actually use. All data that i have access to says I'm using instance hours at one rate, and I'm being charged for some phantom hours. Not only is this bad customer service, but in most places it is against the law. If there is indeed a bug in the system (and bugs do happen), we need either full disclosure of the bug so that we can budget our costs appropriately, or we need to be charged at a rate that matches the usage that is being reported to us. thanks, christian On Monday, October 15, 2012 8:20:37 AM UTC-7, Takashi Matsuo (Google) wrote: Hi Christian, Sorry we're still investigating. However, I'm fairly certain that this is a display bug of billing instance graph rather than overcharging, because the max idle instance settings is set to automatic for this app, which means the number of total instances should be the same as the number of billed instances. Of course, this display bug still sucks, but at least we don't think it's overcharging issue. Also, if you still see higher bills than before, I think it's worth investigating why, but this is another issue in my perspective. Do you still see any unreasonable higher bills? -- Takashi On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 12:47 AM, c h how...@umich.edu wrote: Are there any updates from the engineering team? It's been another week of overbilling. thanks, christian On Monday, October 8, 2012 8:33:27 PM UTC-7, c h wrote: Takashi, thanks! sorry if i was unclear before...there are indeed lots of moving parts to keep track of! let me know if the engineering team has anything to help me out. christian On Monday, October 8, 2012 7:50:30 PM UTC-7, Takashi Matsuo (Google) wrote: Hi Christian, First of all, I need to apologize that your issue if different from the one I mentioned. I'm escalating this to the engineering team. -- Takashi On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 10:45 AM, c h how...@umich.edu wrote: can you at least provide for me information about how the graph is wrong, how much it is wrong, and how to calculate what my expected charges should be until the issue is resolved? otherwise i expect to be billed at the lower rate that your charts and graphs show me. On Monday, October 8, 2012 6:36:03 PM UTC-7, Takashi Matsuo (Google) wrote: Sorry I should have been more clear. I think this issue is affecting only the graph. The billing amount should be still correct. If you feel differently, please consult our billing support team at: http://support.google.com/**code**/go/cloud_billinghttp://support.google.com/code/go/cloud_billing Thanks, On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 10:30 AM, c h how...@umich.edu wrote: What should i file as the bug? As far as i can tell google is overcharging us by 2x. This needs to be resolved immediately and * *retro**actively. I'll have our company finance officers get in touch with google billing to get this settled, and i'll file the bug. thank you, christian On Monday, October 8, 2012 6:25:07 PM UTC-7, Takashi Matsuo (Google) wrote: On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 10:16 AM, c h how...@umich.edu wrote: Takashi, So that means the what you show throughout the day for Frontend instance hours, and the graph of the number of instances currently is inaccurate? We are concerned because we made a change (disabled appstats) which seemed to decrease the number of hours we were using significantly, but the cost did not go down. When will the fix for the dashboard go into place? Our bill has nearly doubled since switching to python2.7 and we need to be able to optimize our application, but if we don't know what resources it is actually using we won't be able to find the right things to target. Sorry for the inconvenience. Can you file a bug on
Re: [google-appengine] Re: 1.7.2 Pre-release SDKs Available
Good! 2012/10/16 cws1989 cws1...@yahoo.com.hk *Wha*t* is the meaning of 'Search API now has a string maximum length limit of 2000 characters'? Is that* mean search API can only index text/string up to 2000 characters? What will happen when I feed a string with 2001 characters in Java SDK? throw exception or search API will ignore characters since index 2000? I've visited the 'Overview' and 'Java Reference' and see https://developers.google.com/appengine/docs/java/javadoc/com/google/appengine/api/search/checkers/FieldChecker#MAXIMUM_TEXT_LENGTHit stated 1048576 bytes, this means it is updated from 1048576 to 2000? Thanks. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/nqMvL6SdPFYJ. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- 西安——深圳——上海 http://szxatjp.blog.163.com/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] web video under the GAE with java
I am a new user for GAE.I want to do a new Instant Communication software based on Web and I want to implement the function of Web Video ,please tell me I shoud how to do ? Thank you ! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/3ay3orOfkbsJ. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] The server encountered an error and could not complete your request.
I deployed my first GAE application at amp-soultions.appsot.com but am getting following error. The server encountered an error and could not complete your request. Does any one know why? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/i8c17WMLLP4J. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
