[google-appengine] In-container testing: Arquillian or Remote API?
Hi everyone, we are getting started to write some Selenium test for our Java App Engine application. Since we want to do some setup/teardown we'd like to do *in-container*testing. As far as I see there are two options: - start the local devserver via Java and run commands via the Remote APIhttps://developers.google.com/appengine/docs/java/tools/remoteapi - use Arquillian http://arquillian.org/ with arquillian-container-gae https://github.com/alesj/arquillian-container-gae What are the pros and cons of Arquillian here? Regards Stephan -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: [google-appengine] Confusing behavior with sockets and pygeocoder in App Engine
I went with option #2... option #1 didn't work... thank you very much for your help!! On Friday, January 3, 2014 11:02:29 PM UTC-5, Vinny P wrote: On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 1:54 PM, Adrian Randall adrianj...@gmail.comjavascript: wrote: I am typing this from my phone so I apologize in advance for any odd formatting. But then the pygeocoder library fails: ConnectionError: HTTPSConnectionPool(host='maps.google.com', port=443): Max retries exceeded with url: /maps/api/geocode/jsonregion=sensor=falsebounds=language= address=New+York%2CNew+York+United+States (Caused by class 'google.appengine.api.remote_socket._remote_socket_error.error': [Errno 13] Permission denied) I see you've posted the error text; can you also post the error traceback? There are a few solutions you can try: 1. Sometimes the Sockets API doesn't play well with SSL. Can you try editing the pygeocoder source to use http:// instead of http*s*://? In other words, go to pygeocoder.py ( http://code.xster.net/pygeocoder/src/b3ae6365ff6179be903c9e222470cdcd3361405e/pygeocoder.py?at=default ), go to line 50, and edit the variable GEOCODE_QUERY_URL to use *http://*. 2. Deploy two separate applications in the same application ID (give them different version numbers). One application can use sockets to pull down large files, while the other application can use URLFetch for the Geocoder API. - -Vinny P Technology Media Advisor Chicago, IL App Engine Code Samples: http://www.learntogoogleit.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
[google-appengine] Can't get a module to start via a cron job
I am having trouble with getting a cron job to start a module... I made a post to Stackoverflow that has the problem... I was going to repost here, but everything is formatted on Stackoverflow. http://stackoverflow.com/questions/20941622/how-to-load-a-basic-module-from-a-cron-job Does anyone have any ideas? Thanks -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
[google-appengine] Re: In-container testing: Arquillian or Remote API?
What are the pros and cons of Arquillian here? Pros: I would say you are far more flexible. See all the funky stuff we're doing in GAE TCK: * https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/appengine-tck Cons: It's sometimes hard to get all the versions of all the components right. But you can always simply copy what's working in GAE TCK, and you should be fine. -Ales -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
[google-appengine] Google App Engine Datastore Admin Errors on Load
Hi All, Whenever I try to access the datastore admin of my application it shows an 500 error page inside the IFrame. Has anyone else seen this, any solutions/workarounds? Googling about this I saw some issues with federated login, but I use a custom domain and no federated login. Thanks, Arun. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
[google-appengine] Re: Processing payments using Paypal, python SDK
If you are inside US you probably didn't notice this, which is good for
you, however there is a HUGE barrier around payment services
It's extremely hard to accept payments, you have to be a company at least
and procedures after that are blurry
For example you can only use stripe from US/UK/Ireland - as far as I
remember
On Saturday, January 4, 2014 9:51:13 PM UTC+2, Doug Anderson wrote:
My advice would be to use Stripe.com for processing payments. You'll be
amazed at how easy it is to get started AND customers don't have to leave
your site!
(I'm not associated with Stripe in any way... just using it with App
Engine and can attest to its ease of use)
I may re-add PayPal at some point (in addition to Stripe) but it's a pita
to deal with the user leaving your site, processing the ipn notifications,
and then HOPING the user hits the button to return to your site when he's
finished on PayPal. With PayPal there's no guarantee the user will return
to your site (although it's fairly likely). I've also noticed that the
initial redirect to PayPal can take a while (for the page to load). Just
my experience... I'm sure there are others that really like it.
On Thursday, January 2, 2014 4:52:23 PM UTC-5, Robert Avram wrote:
I'm trying to figure out how to process payments using paypal python sdk
and google app engine.
the following code seems to work, but I can't figure out, based on the
SDK, how to handle the exceptions (wrong credit card number etc).
I would like the customer to be able to see the error. I would appreciate
any input! thanks!!!
class Buy(generichandler.MainHandler):
def get(self):
api = paypalrestsdk.set_config(
mode=sandbox,
client_id=myclientid,
client_secret=secret)
api.get_token()
paymentDic = {intent: sale,
payer: {
payment_method: credit_card,
funding_instruments: [{
credit_card: {
type: visa,
number: 4417119669820331,
expire_month: 11,
expire_year: 2018,
cvv2: 874,
first_name: Joe,
last_name: Shopper,
billing_address: {
line1: 52 N Main ST,
city: Johnstown,
state: OH,
postal_code: 43210,
country_code: US }}}]},
transactions: [{
amount: {
total: 1.47,
currency: USD,
details:{
subtotal:
1.41,
tax: 0.03,
shipping:
0.03}},
description: This is the
payment transaction description. }]}
payment = paypalrestsdk.Payment(paymentDic)
payment.create()
Enter code here...
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
[google-appengine] Re: Processing payments using Paypal, python SDK
Stripe is working hard to expand their international support (add Canada to
your list along with 8 other countries currently in beta). But I would
agree that PayPal has the best international/currency support. With PayPal
I can be located in the U.S. and accept payments in a variety of currencies
(as long as I enable my account to allow it). But to my knowledge with
PayPal you either have to transfer customers to the PayPal site for a
portion of the processing OR deal with credit card numbers hitting your
server and thus having to deal with PCI compliance. I don't even know if
PCI compliance is possible with App Engine so that may just leave option #1
(transfering customers to PayPal for a portion of the processing... a
perfectly viable option... just less than ideal imo)
On Monday, January 6, 2014 2:41:42 PM UTC-5, Kaan Soral wrote:
If you are inside US you probably didn't notice this, which is good for
you, however there is a HUGE barrier around payment services
It's extremely hard to accept payments, you have to be a company at least
and procedures after that are blurry
For example you can only use stripe from US/UK/Ireland - as far as I
remember
On Saturday, January 4, 2014 9:51:13 PM UTC+2, Doug Anderson wrote:
My advice would be to use Stripe.com for processing payments. You'll be
amazed at how easy it is to get started AND customers don't have to leave
your site!
(I'm not associated with Stripe in any way... just using it with App
Engine and can attest to its ease of use)
I may re-add PayPal at some point (in addition to Stripe) but it's a pita
to deal with the user leaving your site, processing the ipn notifications,
and then HOPING the user hits the button to return to your site when he's
finished on PayPal. With PayPal there's no guarantee the user will return
to your site (although it's fairly likely). I've also noticed that the
initial redirect to PayPal can take a while (for the page to load). Just
my experience... I'm sure there are others that really like it.
On Thursday, January 2, 2014 4:52:23 PM UTC-5, Robert Avram wrote:
I'm trying to figure out how to process payments using paypal python sdk
and google app engine.
the following code seems to work, but I can't figure out, based on the
SDK, how to handle the exceptions (wrong credit card number etc).
I would like the customer to be able to see the error. I would
appreciate any input! thanks!!!
class Buy(generichandler.MainHandler):
def get(self):
api = paypalrestsdk.set_config(
mode=sandbox,
client_id=myclientid,
client_secret=secret)
api.get_token()
paymentDic = {intent: sale,
payer: {
payment_method: credit_card,
funding_instruments: [{
credit_card: {
type: visa,
number: 4417119669820331,
expire_month: 11,
expire_year: 2018,
cvv2: 874,
first_name: Joe,
last_name: Shopper,
billing_address: {
line1: 52 N Main ST,
city: Johnstown,
state: OH,
postal_code: 43210,
country_code: US }}}]},
transactions: [{
amount: {
total: 1.47,
currency: USD,
details:{
subtotal:
1.41,
tax: 0.03
,
shipping:
0.03}},
description: This is the
payment transaction description. }]}
payment = paypalrestsdk.Payment(paymentDic)
payment.create()
Enter code here...
[google-appengine] Re: Processing payments using Paypal, python SDK
I was set on Braintree last time I assessed the market, currently deciding
on how to incorporate locally, Braintree seems to have the widest coverage
for a simplistic/elegant solution similar to Stripe
I think Paypal is a major turn off from many aspects, I would use a layer
similar to Paymentwall to handle all-else payments other than credit cards
Spreedly is also extremely promising, it's not a payment gateway but rather
a PCI workaround that enables one to switch from one provider to another or
use multiple providers etc
(Paypal/Braintree acquisition was alarming, I hope they don't mess
braintree too :)
A beautiful reference for anyone who are interested:
https://spreedly.com/gateways
On Monday, January 6, 2014 10:16:56 PM UTC+2, Doug Anderson wrote:
Stripe is working hard to expand their international support (add Canada
to your list along with 8 other countries currently in beta). But I would
agree that PayPal has the best international/currency support. With PayPal
I can be located in the U.S. and accept payments in a variety of currencies
(as long as I enable my account to allow it). But to my knowledge with
PayPal you either have to transfer customers to the PayPal site for a
portion of the processing OR deal with credit card numbers hitting your
server and thus having to deal with PCI compliance. I don't even know if
PCI compliance is possible with App Engine so that may just leave option #1
(transfering customers to PayPal for a portion of the processing... a
perfectly viable option... just less than ideal imo)
On Monday, January 6, 2014 2:41:42 PM UTC-5, Kaan Soral wrote:
If you are inside US you probably didn't notice this, which is good for
you, however there is a HUGE barrier around payment services
It's extremely hard to accept payments, you have to be a company at least
and procedures after that are blurry
For example you can only use stripe from US/UK/Ireland - as far as I
remember
On Saturday, January 4, 2014 9:51:13 PM UTC+2, Doug Anderson wrote:
My advice would be to use Stripe.com for processing payments. You'll be
amazed at how easy it is to get started AND customers don't have to leave
your site!
(I'm not associated with Stripe in any way... just using it with App
Engine and can attest to its ease of use)
I may re-add PayPal at some point (in addition to Stripe) but it's a
pita to deal with the user leaving your site, processing the ipn
notifications, and then HOPING the user hits the button to return to your
site when he's finished on PayPal. With PayPal there's no guarantee the
user will return to your site (although it's fairly likely). I've also
noticed that the initial redirect to PayPal can take a while (for the page
to load). Just my experience... I'm sure there are others that really like
it.
On Thursday, January 2, 2014 4:52:23 PM UTC-5, Robert Avram wrote:
I'm trying to figure out how to process payments using paypal python
sdk and google app engine.
the following code seems to work, but I can't figure out, based on the
SDK, how to handle the exceptions (wrong credit card number etc).
I would like the customer to be able to see the error. I would
appreciate any input! thanks!!!
class Buy(generichandler.MainHandler):
def get(self):
api = paypalrestsdk.set_config(
mode=sandbox,
client_id=myclientid,
client_secret=secret)
api.get_token()
paymentDic = {intent: sale,
payer: {
payment_method: credit_card,
funding_instruments: [{
credit_card:
{
type: visa,
number: 4417119669820331,
expire_month: 11,
expire_year: 2018,
cvv2: 874,
first_name: Joe,
last_name: Shopper,
billing_address: {
line1: 52 N Main ST,
city: Johnstown,
state: OH,
postal_code: 43210,
Re: [google-appengine] Processing payments using Paypal, python SDK
paypal has a rest api and you don’t need to redirect the customers to paypal.
but paypal is a pain to deal with in any case… and customer service is very bad.
i believe you need to be PCI compliant only if you store the credit card data,
not if you just process the api call on server side.
another great service is www.braintreepayments.com which works all over the
world.
On Jan 6, 2014, at 3:26 PM, Kaan Soral kaanso...@gmail.com wrote:
I was set on Braintree last time I assessed the market, currently deciding on
how to incorporate locally, Braintree seems to have the widest coverage for a
simplistic/elegant solution similar to Stripe
I think Paypal is a major turn off from many aspects, I would use a layer
similar to Paymentwall to handle all-else payments other than credit cards
Spreedly is also extremely promising, it's not a payment gateway but rather a
PCI workaround that enables one to switch from one provider to another or use
multiple providers etc
(Paypal/Braintree acquisition was alarming, I hope they don't mess braintree
too :)
A beautiful reference for anyone who are interested:
https://spreedly.com/gateways
On Monday, January 6, 2014 10:16:56 PM UTC+2, Doug Anderson wrote:
Stripe is working hard to expand their international support (add Canada to
your list along with 8 other countries currently in beta). But I would agree
that PayPal has the best international/currency support. With PayPal I can
be located in the U.S. and accept payments in a variety of currencies (as
long as I enable my account to allow it). But to my knowledge with PayPal you
either have to transfer customers to the PayPal site for a portion of the
processing OR deal with credit card numbers hitting your server and thus
having to deal with PCI compliance. I don't even know if PCI compliance is
possible with App Engine so that may just leave option #1 (transfering
customers to PayPal for a portion of the processing... a perfectly viable
option... just less than ideal imo)
On Monday, January 6, 2014 2:41:42 PM UTC-5, Kaan Soral wrote:
If you are inside US you probably didn't notice this, which is good for you,
however there is a HUGE barrier around payment services
It's extremely hard to accept payments, you have to be a company at least and
procedures after that are blurry
For example you can only use stripe from US/UK/Ireland - as far as I remember
On Saturday, January 4, 2014 9:51:13 PM UTC+2, Doug Anderson wrote:
My advice would be to use Stripe.com for processing payments. You'll be
amazed at how easy it is to get started AND customers don't have to leave
your site!
(I'm not associated with Stripe in any way... just using it with App Engine
and can attest to its ease of use)
I may re-add PayPal at some point (in addition to Stripe) but it's a pita to
deal with the user leaving your site, processing the ipn notifications, and
then HOPING the user hits the button to return to your site when he's
finished on PayPal. With PayPal there's no guarantee the user will return to
your site (although it's fairly likely). I've also noticed that the initial
redirect to PayPal can take a while (for the page to load). Just my
experience... I'm sure there are others that really like it.
On Thursday, January 2, 2014 4:52:23 PM UTC-5, Robert Avram wrote:
I'm trying to figure out how to process payments using paypal python sdk and
google app engine.
the following code seems to work, but I can't figure out, based on the SDK,
how to handle the exceptions (wrong credit card number etc).
I would like the customer to be able to see the error. I would appreciate any
input! thanks!!!
class Buy(generichandler.MainHandler):
def get(self):
api = paypalrestsdk.set_config(
mode=sandbox,
client_id=myclientid,
client_secret=secret)
api.get_token()
paymentDic = {intent: sale,
payer: {
payment_method: credit_card,
funding_instruments: [{
credit_card: {
type: visa,
number: 4417119669820331,
expire_month: 11,
expire_year: 2018,
cvv2: 874,
first_name: Joe,
last_name: Shopper,
billing_address: {
Re: [google-appengine] Re: how to start all modules instances on dev server?
Tapir, was the bad character in the App Engine documentation somewhere? If so, where? On Sunday, 5 January 2014 00:33:33 UTC-8, Tapir wrote: Ok, found the problem by accident. After finding the google maven example on github works well, I copied the META-INF folder to my project. A replace files dialog was expected to show up. But, no, it didn't show! Then there are two META-INF folders in my project. Two identical folders in my project!!! Researched it for a while, I copy the two folder name into a notepad file, the difference is obvious. One - character is longer than the other one. (But in windows file explorer, they are the same length! However, in IE browser, the shorter one becomes longer) The hexdump shows the longer is e22d 9180, the shorter one is 000A. Ok, the short one is the correct one. It is META-INF The longer one is META-INF. So, it looks it must be my mistake? Aha, no. I search the longer one in the google document: https://developers.google.com/appengine/docs/java/modules/ Eh, it seems this page mixes the longer one and the shorter one many times. I'm so lucky that I picked the wrong one. Can't believe no one else has found this problem before. Does this mean there are very few projects using the modules feature? On Thursday, January 2, 2014 5:31:01 PM UTC+8, Tapir wrote: On Thursday, January 2, 2014 3:31:14 PM UTC+8, Vinny P wrote: On Wed, Jan 1, 2014 at 11:03 PM, Tapir tapi...@gmail.com wrote: This page mentions all modules instances will be started. https://developers.google.com/appengine/docs/java/modules/routing But I don't how to do this. When call dev_server on a second module, it says: Could not open the requested socket: Address already in use: bind. Try overriding --address and/or --port. The dev server should be starting up all the modules automatically, you don't need to call the dev server a second time. When you call the dev server on the second module - after already calling it on the first module - the second dev server instance is unable to run because (as it points out in the error text) the first dev server instance is already bound to the port. So this is correct behavior. On Wed, Jan 1, 2014 at 11:03 PM, Tapir tapi...@gmail.com wrote: If I call dev_server on the ear directory, it says com.google.apphosting.utils.config.AppEngineConfigException: Could not locate D:\my-project\ear\WEB-INF\appengine-web.xml yes, there is no WEB-INF in the ear folder but only a META-INF folder and module folders in the ear folder. More than likely, the dev server is interpreting your folder as a basic, single-module application rather than a multi-module application (i.e. JAR rather than an EAR). Can you post the stack trace for the AppEngineConfigException? yes, I think so. How to let dev_server not interpret the folder as a single-module app? The folder structure is like this: my-project --- ear -- META-INF - appengine-application.xml - application.xml -- default - war WEB-INF --- appengine-web.xml web.xml -- websockets - war WEB-INF --- appengine-web.xml web.xml The following is added in application.xml: module web web-uridefault/web-uri context-rootdefault/context-root /web /module module web web-uriwebsokets/web-uri context-rootwebsokets/context-root /web /module I downloaded the example on git, but I dislike the mvn style so I give up it. The mvn style hide too many details, so I think it is not a good example to start. Afte run dev_appserver.cmd ear, the stack trace is output: Jan 02, 2014 5:15:46 PM com.google.apphosting.utils.config.AppEngineWebXmlReader readAppEngineWebXml SEVERE: Received exception processing D:\my-project\ear\WEB-INF/appengine-web.xml com.google.apphosting.utils.config.AppEngineConfigException: Could not locate D:\my-project\ear\WEB-INF\appengine-web.xml at com.google.apphosting.utils.config.AppEngineWebXmlReader.getInputStream(AppEngineWebXmlReader.java:140) at com.google.apphosting.utils.config.AppEngineWebXmlReader.readAppEngineWebXml(AppEngineWebXmlReader.java:75) at com.google.apphosting.utils.config.EarHelper.readWebModule(EarHelper.java:166) at com.google.appengine.tools.development.ApplicationConfigurationManager$WarModuleConfigurationHandle.readConfiguration(ApplicationConfigurationManager.java:399) at com.google.appengine.tools.development.ApplicationConfigurationManager.init(ApplicationConfigurationManager.java:146) at com.google.appengine.tools.development.ApplicationConfigurationManager.newWarConfigurationManager(ApplicationConfigurationManager.java:88) at com.google.appengine.tools.development.DevAppServerImpl.init(DevAppServerImpl.java:139)
Re: [google-appengine] Processing payments using Paypal, python SDK
should be that way but the page and request has to be https/secure as far
as I remember
On Monday, January 6, 2014 10:47:02 PM UTC+2, aschmid wrote:
paypal has a rest api and you don’t need to redirect the customers to
paypal. but paypal is a pain to deal with in any case… and customer service
is very bad.
i believe you need to be PCI compliant only if you store the credit card
data, not if you just process the api call on server side.
another great service is www.braintreepayments.com which works all over
the world.
On Jan 6, 2014, at 3:26 PM, Kaan Soral kaan...@gmail.com javascript:
wrote:
I was set on Braintree last time I assessed the market, currently deciding
on how to incorporate locally, Braintree seems to have the widest coverage
for a simplistic/elegant solution similar to Stripe
I think Paypal is a major turn off from many aspects, I would use a layer
similar to Paymentwall to handle all-else payments other than credit cards
Spreedly is also extremely promising, it's not a payment gateway but
rather a PCI workaround that enables one to switch from one provider to
another or use multiple providers etc
(Paypal/Braintree acquisition was alarming, I hope they don't mess
braintree too :)
A beautiful reference for anyone who are interested:
https://spreedly.com/gateways
On Monday, January 6, 2014 10:16:56 PM UTC+2, Doug Anderson wrote:
Stripe is working hard to expand their international support (add Canada
to your list along with 8 other countries currently in beta). But I would
agree that PayPal has the best international/currency support. With PayPal
I can be located in the U.S. and accept payments in a variety of currencies
(as long as I enable my account to allow it). But to my knowledge with
PayPal you either have to transfer customers to the PayPal site for a
portion of the processing OR deal with credit card numbers hitting your
server and thus having to deal with PCI compliance. I don't even know if
PCI compliance is possible with App Engine so that may just leave option #1
(transfering customers to PayPal for a portion of the processing... a
perfectly viable option... just less than ideal imo)
On Monday, January 6, 2014 2:41:42 PM UTC-5, Kaan Soral wrote:
If you are inside US you probably didn't notice this, which is good for
you, however there is a HUGE barrier around payment services
It's extremely hard to accept payments, you have to be a company at
least and procedures after that are blurry
For example you can only use stripe from US/UK/Ireland - as far as I
remember
On Saturday, January 4, 2014 9:51:13 PM UTC+2, Doug Anderson wrote:
My advice would be to use Stripe.com for processing payments. You'll
be amazed at how easy it is to get started AND customers don't have to
leave your site!
(I'm not associated with Stripe in any way... just using it with App
Engine and can attest to its ease of use)
I may re-add PayPal at some point (in addition to Stripe) but it's a
pita to deal with the user leaving your site, processing the ipn
notifications, and then HOPING the user hits the button to return to your
site when he's finished on PayPal. With PayPal there's no guarantee the
user will return to your site (although it's fairly likely). I've also
noticed that the initial redirect to PayPal can take a while (for the page
to load). Just my experience... I'm sure there are others that really
like
it.
On Thursday, January 2, 2014 4:52:23 PM UTC-5, Robert Avram wrote:
I'm trying to figure out how to process payments using paypal python
sdk and google app engine.
the following code seems to work, but I can't figure out, based on the
SDK, how to handle the exceptions (wrong credit card number etc).
I would like the customer to be able to see the error. I would
appreciate any input! thanks!!!
class Buy(generichandler.MainHandler):
def get(self):
api = paypalrestsdk.set_config(
mode=sandbox,
client_id=myclientid,
client_secret=secret)
api.get_token()
paymentDic = {intent: sale,
payer: {
payment_method: credit_card,
funding_instruments: [{
credit_card:
{
type: visa,
number: 4417119669820331,
expire_month: 11,
expire_year: 2018,
cvv2: 874,
first_name: Joe,
[google-appengine] Implementing OAuth 2.0 'application only authentication' on App Engine
I have an App Engine server that provides a REST API and would like to protect it with OAuth 2.0. Applications that use my REST API will be run on headless servers and not have any user input i.e. no web browser redirects for users to enter their username and password. Twitter does more or less what I want with its Application Only Authhttps://dev.twitter.com/docs/auth/application-only-auth which uses the Client Credentials Granthttp://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6749#section-4.4 approach of OAuth 2.0. Does the App Engine OAuth servicehttps://developers.google.com/appengine/docs/python/oauth/ allow me to do this? If so how? (I find the documentation confusing and can't get a 2-legged approach to work in any case.) Otherwise where should I look for an alternative as I don't want to reinvent the wheel especially with security related parts of my app. I would appreciate pointers to Go resources, but Python would also work for me. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: [google-appengine] Backend instance hours on Usage History
On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 6:52 AM, Béla Uzonyi uzon...@gmail.com wrote: The Usage History page is still showing about twice as much B1 instance hours as the Dashboard. Is there a ticket opened for this somewhere? There are a couple of incorrect-usage-reported issues floating around the tracker, such as this one: https://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=7627 If you search this forum, you'll see similar reports of instance hours being incorrectly reported. - -Vinny P Technology Media Advisor Chicago, IL App Engine Code Samples: http://www.learntogoogleit.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: [google-appengine] Google App Engine Datastore Admin Errors on Load
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 1:40 PM, Arun Shanker Prasad arunshankerpra...@gmail.com wrote: Whenever I try to access the datastore admin of my application it shows an 500 error page inside the IFrame. Has anyone else seen this, any solutions/workarounds? Googling about this I saw some issues with federated login, but I use a custom domain and no federated login. Try opening the datastore admin frame contents in a new tab or window. Depending on your browser, you might be able to simply right click on the frame and select *Open Frame In New Window*. If you don't see that option, try a plugin such as this one: https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/open-frame-in-new-tab/jjjodgdplcalapdbmmgadocimcahehjf Also, make sure you're only logged into one Google account and not multiple accounts; you can do this by opening a new Incognito window (or your browser's equivalent) and then logging into the Google account attached to App Engine. - -Vinny P Technology Media Advisor Chicago, IL App Engine Code Samples: http://www.learntogoogleit.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: [google-appengine] Can't get a module to start via a cron job
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 8:05 AM, Adrian adrianj.rand...@gmail.com wrote: I am having trouble with getting a cron job to start a module... I made a post to Stackoverflow that has the problem. Can you supply the full traceback from the error? - -Vinny P Technology Media Advisor Chicago, IL App Engine Code Samples: http://www.learntogoogleit.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: [google-appengine] Can't get a module to start via a cron job
Thanks Vinny -- here is the full traceback: Traceback (most recent call last): File /home/adrian/google_appengine/lib/webapp2-2.5.1/webapp2.py, line 1536, in __call__ rv = self.handle_exception(request, response, e) File /home/adrian/google_appengine/lib/webapp2-2.5.1/webapp2.py, line 1530, in __call__ rv = self.router.dispatch(request, response) File /home/adrian/google_appengine/lib/webapp2-2.5.1/webapp2.py, line 1278, in default_dispatcher return route.handler_adapter(request, response) File /home/adrian/google_appengine/lib/webapp2-2.5.1/webapp2.py, line 1102, in __call__ return handler.dispatch() File /home/adrian/google_appengine/lib/webapp2-2.5.1/webapp2.py, line 572, in dispatch return self.handle_exception(e, self.app.debug) File /home/adrian/google_appengine/lib/webapp2-2.5.1/webapp2.py, line 570, in dispatch return method(*args, **kwargs) File /home/adrian/arapphost/callLoadAndProcess.py, line 10, in get modules.start_module(loadandprocess,1) File /home/adrian/google_appengine/google/appengine/api/modules/modules.py, line 385, in start_module rpc.get_result() File /home/adrian/google_appengine/google/appengine/api/apiproxy_stub_map.py, line 612, in get_result return self.__get_result_hook(self) File /home/adrian/google_appengine/google/appengine/api/modules/modules.py, line 403, in _ResultHook _CheckAsyncResult(rpc, mapped_errors) File /home/adrian/google_appengine/google/appengine/api/modules/modules.py, line 138, in _CheckAsyncResult raise mapped_error() InvalidVersionError On Monday, January 6, 2014 8:00:01 PM UTC-5, Vinny P wrote: On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 8:05 AM, Adrian adrianj...@gmail.com javascript: wrote: I am having trouble with getting a cron job to start a module... I made a post to Stackoverflow that has the problem. Can you supply the full traceback from the error? - -Vinny P Technology Media Advisor Chicago, IL App Engine Code Samples: http://www.learntogoogleit.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: [google-appengine] Some confused on free instances limit for each module.
On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 8:29 PM, Tapir tapir@gmail.com wrote: At the end of the document: https://developers.google.com/appengine/docs/java/modules/ it says Maximum Instances per Manual/Basic Scaling Version for Free App is 20. Not very understand this. Haven't google limited the number of free instances to one, or total free instance hours to 28 long long ago? The total free instance hours per day is 28, but you can choose to spend those hours however you want. You can choose to run 1 instance for 24 hours a day, 2 instances in parallel for 14 hours a day, 3 instances in parallel for 9.3 hours per day, etc. Granted, most people choose not to do that but it is possible. - -Vinny P Technology Media Advisor Chicago, IL App Engine Code Samples: http://www.learntogoogleit.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: [google-appengine] Some confused on free instances limit for each module.
On Tuesday, January 7, 2014 9:06:30 AM UTC+8, Vinny P wrote: On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 8:29 PM, Tapir tapi...@gmail.com javascript: wrote: At the end of the document: https://developers.google.com/appengine/docs/java/modules/ it says Maximum Instances per Manual/Basic Scaling Version for Free App is 20. Not very understand this. Haven't google limited the number of free instances to one, or total free instance hours to 28 long long ago? The total free instance hours per day is 28, but you can choose to spend those hours however you want. You can choose to run 1 instance for 24 hours a day, 2 instances in parallel for 14 hours a day, 3 instances in parallel for 9.3 hours per day, etc. Granted, most people choose not to do that but it is possible. Thanks for explanation. But I think the document is still some misleading. - -Vinny P Technology Media Advisor Chicago, IL App Engine Code Samples: http://www.learntogoogleit.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: [google-appengine] Re: how to start all modules instances on dev server?
On Tuesday, January 7, 2014 4:59:58 AM UTC+8, Andrew Jessup wrote: Tapir, was the bad character in the App Engine documentation somewhere? If so, where? En ha, yes, there are some META-INF and some META-INF. I have already reported this bug. And It seems this bug was fixed just now. At the end of that page, it show Last updated January 7, 2014. On Sunday, 5 January 2014 00:33:33 UTC-8, Tapir wrote: Ok, found the problem by accident. After finding the google maven example on github works well, I copied the META-INF folder to my project. A replace files dialog was expected to show up. But, no, it didn't show! Then there are two META-INF folders in my project. Two identical folders in my project!!! Researched it for a while, I copy the two folder name into a notepad file, the difference is obvious. One - character is longer than the other one. (But in windows file explorer, they are the same length! However, in IE browser, the shorter one becomes longer) The hexdump shows the longer is e22d 9180, the shorter one is 000A. Ok, the short one is the correct one. It is META-INF The longer one is META-INF. So, it looks it must be my mistake? Aha, no. I search the longer one in the google document: https://developers.google.com/appengine/docs/java/modules/ Eh, it seems this page mixes the longer one and the shorter one many times. I'm so lucky that I picked the wrong one. Can't believe no one else has found this problem before. Does this mean there are very few projects using the modules feature? On Thursday, January 2, 2014 5:31:01 PM UTC+8, Tapir wrote: On Thursday, January 2, 2014 3:31:14 PM UTC+8, Vinny P wrote: On Wed, Jan 1, 2014 at 11:03 PM, Tapir tapi...@gmail.com wrote: This page mentions all modules instances will be started. https://developers.google.com/appengine/docs/java/modules/routing But I don't how to do this. When call dev_server on a second module, it says: Could not open the requested socket: Address already in use: bind. Try overriding --address and/or --port. The dev server should be starting up all the modules automatically, you don't need to call the dev server a second time. When you call the dev server on the second module - after already calling it on the first module - the second dev server instance is unable to run because (as it points out in the error text) the first dev server instance is already bound to the port. So this is correct behavior. On Wed, Jan 1, 2014 at 11:03 PM, Tapir tapi...@gmail.com wrote: If I call dev_server on the ear directory, it says com.google.apphosting.utils.config.AppEngineConfigException: Could not locate D:\my-project\ear\WEB-INF\appengine-web.xml yes, there is no WEB-INF in the ear folder but only a META-INF folder and module folders in the ear folder. More than likely, the dev server is interpreting your folder as a basic, single-module application rather than a multi-module application (i.e. JAR rather than an EAR). Can you post the stack trace for the AppEngineConfigException? yes, I think so. How to let dev_server not interpret the folder as a single-module app? The folder structure is like this: my-project --- ear -- META-INF - appengine-application.xml - application.xml -- default - war WEB-INF --- appengine-web.xml web.xml -- websockets - war WEB-INF --- appengine-web.xml web.xml The following is added in application.xml: module web web-uridefault/web-uri context-rootdefault/context-root /web /module module web web-uriwebsokets/web-uri context-rootwebsokets/context-root /web /module I downloaded the example on git, but I dislike the mvn style so I give up it. The mvn style hide too many details, so I think it is not a good example to start. Afte run dev_appserver.cmd ear, the stack trace is output: Jan 02, 2014 5:15:46 PM com.google.apphosting.utils.config.AppEngineWebXmlReader readAppEngineWebXml SEVERE: Received exception processing D:\my-project\ear\WEB-INF/appengine-web.xml com.google.apphosting.utils.config.AppEngineConfigException: Could not locate D:\my-project\ear\WEB-INF\appengine-web.xml at com.google.apphosting.utils.config.AppEngineWebXmlReader.getInputStream(AppEngineWebXmlReader.java:140) at com.google.apphosting.utils.config.AppEngineWebXmlReader.readAppEngineWebXml(AppEngineWebXmlReader.java:75) at com.google.apphosting.utils.config.EarHelper.readWebModule(EarHelper.java:166) at com.google.appengine.tools.development.ApplicationConfigurationManager$WarModuleConfigurationHandle.readConfiguration(ApplicationConfigurationManager.java:399) at
Re: [google-appengine] Can't get a module to start via a cron job
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 7:03 PM, Adrian adrianj.rand...@gmail.com wrote: File /home/adrian/arapphost/callLoadAndProcess.py, line 10, in get modules.start_module(loadandprocess,1) File /home/adrian/google_appengine/google/appengine/api/modules/modules.py, line 385, in start_module rpc.get_result() The traceback claims that the module and version you're referring to doesn't exist. Try to debug the problem by: 1. Sometimes modules throw up unusual errors when versions are expressed as pure numbers instead of a mix of letters and numbers. In loadandprocess.yaml, change *version: 1* to *version: one*. Remember to update *callLoadAndProcess.py* with the correct version (the *start_module* call). 2. You can use *get_modules()* and *get_versions(module=___)* in the *modules* package to enumerate all the modules and all the versions of a given module that App Engine recognizes within your application. App Engine may be recording the module under a different name or version. - -Vinny P Technology Media Advisor Chicago, IL App Engine Code Samples: http://www.learntogoogleit.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
