[google-appengine] Server error (500) when I tried to re-enable an app

[garyciao]

I've disabled an app from Google's app engine Administration - Application 
Settings. Now I trid to re-enble it. But the brower returns a server error 
(500). I trid to request permanenant deletion. Again the same server error 
occurs. 

How should I proceed? 

Thanks.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google App Engine" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

[google-appengine] Managed VM networking with other GCE VMs, like AWS security group?

[Hussein Vastani]

Hi all,
I'm wondering if this is possible: I'd like to use a (secured) backend 
Managed VM to act as a load balancing reverse proxy to a cluster of GCE VMs 
hosting ElasticSearch. So the ES cluster VMs will not have public internet 
IPs and the managed VM accesses the Elasticsearch VMs using their internal 
IP addresses. Can a managed VM be part of a GCE network in order to achieve 
this setup? Any other suggestions are welcome.

Thanks.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google App Engine" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

[google-appengine] APP cannot be deleted or re-enabled

[garyciao]

One of my APP was disabled previoulsy. Now I want it to be re-ennabled. But 
when I clicked the Re-Enanable button on the Manage disabled status page. 
It returned a Server Error (500) response.
I tried to request permanent deletion and got the same server error.
I tried to recreat a new app and deployed and made it run. it is ok. Then i 
disable it again and try to re-enable it. the same error occurs. 
What is worng? How to sovle it?

Thanks.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google App Engine" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

[google-appengine] Using Proxies for HTTPS requests

[Tracy Moore]

I'm using urllib2 to make several HTTP and HTTPS requests. My problem is 
that I'm unable to make HTTPS requests through a proxy, as the GAE httplib 
wont allow tunneling.

Is there anyway around this?

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google App Engine" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [google-appengine] Re: "One senses GAE is just not a major priority for Google"

[Marcel Manz]

Hey Daniel

I'm very happy to hear back from Google on this forum and wish to point out 
that it has to be very important for Google to follow this group in order 
to share updates etc. Stackoverflow is an external site which is great for 
code fragment sharing, but it's not a great place to discuss about specific 
technology in general which should be discussed on a Google hosted 
Group/Forum.

If you would follow what the other large cloud provider is doing with its 
forum you would immediately recognize the importance of having a provider 
<> client/developer relationship. We ourselves are supported by Google 
Premier Support, hence we direct many questions directly to Google's 
support staff, which so far has been able to solve most of the issues we 
discovered. However there for sure are many developers out there who select 
a platform, based on their own judgment on how active the provider <> 
client/developer relationship is maintained in forums. If there is zero 
support/feedback by the provider, those clients might opt for another cloud 
provider without investigating further your solution.

>From a feature perspective, Google should really complete the integration 
of PHP. Since its integration there's *the* key-service missing which is 
DataStore. Yes, it is accessible via API's, but that's not the same as the 
native direct datastore access we requested in:

https://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=9931

I'm really looking forward for Google to finally complete this integration, 
so we can migrate additional workloads using DataStore over to GAE/PHP. 
Many of our projects are using Datastore through Java at the moment, but 
Java isn't the preferred language on our recent projects, which more and 
more are done in PHP.

Kind regards,
Marcel

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google App Engine" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [google-appengine] Re: "One senses GAE is just not a major priority for Google"

[Daniel Sturman]

Thanks for your candid responses. I hear your concerns loud and clear. I 
think the issues you raised all boil down to one thing: you’d like to see 
greater engagement between the App Engine team and our developer community.

With regards to your specific concerns:

I agree that an issue tracker is of little use if we aren’t actively 
triaging and updating it.  Although I could address the individual examples 
you pointed out one by one (e.g. we partnered with SendGrid to give you a 
good alternative for sending email), I think the proper action here is to 
triage the open issues in the tracker.  We have been ramping up support for 
doing this and you can expect to start seeing traction in the coming weeks. 
 

As we ramp back up on feature work, we’ll also resume using the group for 
outbound communications regarding releases as well as any other 
developer-facing changes.  In parallel we’re having our support engineers 
monitor the group for issues and topics that need to be addressed by 
Google.  These will either be answered directly by that team or will be 
routed to the proper product management and / or engineering team. 

-Dan

VP, Engineering


On Wednesday, November 12, 2014 1:27:33 PM UTC-8, Marcel Manz wrote:
>
> Hey Daniel
>
> I'm very happy to hear back from Google on this forum and wish to point 
> out that it has to be very important for Google to follow this group in 
> order to share updates etc. Stackoverflow is an external site which is 
> great for code fragment sharing, but it's not a great place to discuss 
> about specific technology in general which should be discussed on a Google 
> hosted Group/Forum.
>
> If you would follow what the other large cloud provider is doing with its 
> forum you would immediately recognize the importance of having a provider 
> <> client/developer relationship. We ourselves are supported by Google 
> Premier Support, hence we direct many questions directly to Google's 
> support staff, which so far has been able to solve most of the issues we 
> discovered. However there for sure are many developers out there who select 
> a platform, based on their own judgment on how active the provider <> 
> client/developer relationship is maintained in forums. If there is zero 
> support/feedback by the provider, those clients might opt for another cloud 
> provider without investigating further your solution.
>
> From a feature perspective, Google should really complete the integration 
> of PHP. Since its integration there's *the* key-service missing which is 
> DataStore. Yes, it is accessible via API's, but that's not the same as the 
> native direct datastore access we requested in:
>
> https://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=9931
>
> I'm really looking forward for Google to finally complete this 
> integration, so we can migrate additional workloads using DataStore over to 
> GAE/PHP. Many of our projects are using Datastore through Java at the 
> moment, but Java isn't the preferred language on our recent projects, which 
> more and more are done in PHP.
>
> Kind regards,
> Marcel
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google App Engine" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [google-appengine] Using Proxies for HTTPS requests

[Vinny P]

On Sun, Nov 9, 2014 at 7:22 PM, Tracy Moore  wrote:

> I'm using urllib2 to make several HTTP and HTTPS requests. My problem is
> that I'm unable to make HTTPS requests through a proxy, as the GAE httplib
> wont allow tunneling.
>
> Is there anyway around this?
>


I assume you're getting *NotImplementedError - HTTP CONNECT Tunnelling is
not supported*?

Sorry to say this, but there's no way around it. You'll have to find a
different way to connect to the proxy and tell it what to retrieve - for
instance, the proxy could implement a HTTP API that you could then call out
to using basic urlfetch.

Another alternative is to use a Managed VM

and access the proxy from there, or use a prebuilt solution such as
Blockspring
.


-
-Vinny P
Technology & Media Consultant
Chicago, IL

App Engine Code Samples: http://www.learntogoogleit.com

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google App Engine" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [google-appengine] Managed VM networking with other GCE VMs, like AWS security group?

[Vinny P]

On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 6:02 PM, Hussein Vastani  wrote:
>
> I'm wondering if this is possible: I'd like to use a (secured) backend
> Managed VM to act as a load balancing reverse proxy to a cluster of GCE VMs
> hosting ElasticSearch. So the ES cluster VMs will not have public internet
> IPs and the managed VM accesses the Elasticsearch VMs using their internal
> IP addresses. Can a managed VM be part of a GCE network in order to achieve
> this setup? Any other suggestions are welcome.
>


I don't think you can add a Managed VM to a GCE network, although this
might be a nice feature request to make.

In the meantime, it would probably be better to move the Managed VM (or at
least part of it) to a publicly-addressable GCE instance and let that
instance address the internal search machines.


-
-Vinny P
Technology & Media Consultant
Chicago, IL

App Engine Code Samples: http://www.learntogoogleit.com

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google App Engine" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [google-appengine] Server error (500) when I tried to re-enable an app

[Vinny P]

On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 6:29 PM,  wrote:

> I've disabled an app from Google's app engine Administration - Application
> Settings. Now I trid to re-enble it. But the brower returns a server error
> (500). I trid to request permanenant deletion. Again the same server error
> occurs.
>
> How should I proceed?
>



Disabled applications don't count against your free app quota and don't
cost you money, so you can leave it in disabled state if you want.

If you absolutely must get rid of the application, you can try going
through the cloud console. Go to cloud.google.com/console and select your
project. Click the *Billing & settings* link, and then the *Delete project*
button.

 http://imgur.com/1hTNhXF

If you're logged into multiple Google accounts at the same time, you can
also try completely logging out and logging back in with only the App
Engine admin account, then retrying the delete process.


-
-Vinny P
Technology & Media Consultant
Chicago, IL

App Engine Code Samples: http://www.learntogoogleit.com

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google App Engine" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [google-appengine] Using Proxies for HTTPS requests

[Iain Wade]

sockets api?

https://cloud.google.com/appengine/docs/python/sockets/

See the "Making httplib use sockets" section.

--Iain

On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Vinny P  wrote:

> On Sun, Nov 9, 2014 at 7:22 PM, Tracy Moore 
>  wrote:
>
>> I'm using urllib2 to make several HTTP and HTTPS requests. My problem is
>> that I'm unable to make HTTPS requests through a proxy, as the GAE httplib
>> wont allow tunneling.
>>
>> Is there anyway around this?
>>
>
>
> I assume you're getting *NotImplementedError - HTTP CONNECT Tunnelling is
> not supported*?
>
> Sorry to say this, but there's no way around it. You'll have to find a
> different way to connect to the proxy and tell it what to retrieve - for
> instance, the proxy could implement a HTTP API that you could then call out
> to using basic urlfetch.
>
> Another alternative is to use a Managed VM
> 
> and access the proxy from there, or use a prebuilt solution such as
> Blockspring
> .
>
>
> -
> -Vinny P
> Technology & Media Consultant
> Chicago, IL
>
> App Engine Code Samples: http://www.learntogoogleit.com
>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Google App Engine" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google App Engine" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.