[google-appengine] Google
For being geniuses, your documentation and organizational skills are less than desirable. You choose to take on multiple IDEs/environments and release them untested. Try picking one, we all have Linux, Mac, Windows. State the person that wrote this documentation is on XXYY version xy, so it must work as he expected (we are testing other environments, but we know this one works!). I've developed against a load of sdks web, mobile, data, os, windows etc etc, mostly because I like to have an extremely good time,can't pull my life together, need money and lack the overall skills to be a engineer. One thing is certain though, I would rather jab my eyes out then work through the next Google project. I have to be employed in America, why do you have to make it painful. Not everyone gets off on digging through scripts, open source code, and logs to decipher why this pos decided to lock x file and not rebuild it & write nothing to a log etc. Some of us want to build something cool and go to the bar. Lastly, why the verbosity? Clear & concise patterns & code never seem to be the aim. Its not like the code needs to be clear it'll take a pick ax to get through a relatively new Google environment anyway. You may as well finish it off and let developers type less. Composite, C Calendar, Ca Let me imagine I got the chemistry degree I should have. Alright, better now .. back to jabbing my eyes out. Your responding/ discussion skills are way above bar though, so that is good !~ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: No App Engine Connected Android Project option in Eclipse???
Did you sdk location? http://code.google.com/eclipse/docs/appeng_android_install_setup.html On Sep 21, 6:50 am, Blue wrote: > Hi! > > I'm trying to create an "App Engine Connected Android Project" in > eclipse, but that option is missing in new project menu. (like > here:http://bradabrams.com/2011/05/google-io-session-overview-android-app-...) > I have updated all eclipse plugins, but still nothing. (GPE v2.4, ADT > v12.0) > > Please help. > Thanks, > Gregor -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Google
I should have been clearer. The AppEngine documents themselves are above par, it took only a few hours to proof of concept what I wanted from them. Should people switch to GWT, AppEngine, GData.. Is it going to save time, money, be more reliable. I like finding out my making something small. >From what I've seen so far, which isn't enough time to form a quality opinion - the GAE,GWT, and GDATA teams think it is a race, and they're leaving pitfalls for each other's users scattered throughout. At about hour 12-20 of prototyping you hit a cyclone in the middle. This thing spun me so completely I thought I was going a need a team from M.I.T. to come in to oAuth2. Something that is done & done, I wrote a oAuth2/data library for my classic TI83+ that prototypes better. There is a large mixture of version 2.x.x, 1.0.x, 1.0.x, 550.x.x.x (client or server side). When combining gdata,gwt,gae. There are code branches linked with aged, dead solutions to the simplest problems, 25 different OAuth2 pages stating/implementing the same thing completely differently. I know the concepts, it'd be awesome to have a functioning/reusable syntax. I must have missed the super important golden link that has quality information (flow charts,spreadsheets,functional repository code samples). I find a small drawing worth more than a 40,000 word dialog of a person mentally masturbating to his architecture. Ketamine trips have less holes to fall in. On Sep 21, 12:59 am, Tim Hoffman wrote: > I would strongly agree with Robert, and not agree with the OP. > I find the appengine docs are fine, everything can do with improvement > though ;-) > > Just my 2c worth > > T -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Google
Wrote a long winded reply not sure if it went through ->>> but this - is hell. The gdata docs / api are a different story -- complete and total mess, along with a disaster of an API to go with it! But, that's not related to App Engine. On Sep 21, 12:59 am, Tim Hoffman wrote: > I would strongly agree with Robert, and not agree with the OP. > I find the appengine docs are fine, everything can do with improvement > though ;-) > > Just my 2c worth > > T -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
