[google-appengine] Failed to deploy Asp.Net Web application
I followed the tutorials of Deploy an ASP.NET Application to a Windows
Server 2012 R2 Instance. at the step 6 in Deploy the application to your
Windows instance, I got the following message:
Web deployment task failed. (Could not connect to the remote computer
("146.148.xx.xxx") using the specified process ("Web Management Service")
because the server did not respond. Make sure that the process ("Web
Management Service") is started on the remote computer. Learn more at:
http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=221672#ERROR_COULD_NOT_CONNECT_TO_REMOTESVC.)
Is there anybody got the same error and how can I fix it?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-appengine/ebdc52c0-eb4a-4569-95ab-d14dc33920a2%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[google-appengine] Re: I can't access my app from my computer. Google unusual traffic error message.
yeah seems screwed up use your appname.appspot.com url (does not help your users) and file a production ticket the link is above somewhere -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: I can't access my app from my computer. Google unusual traffic error message.
make sure I tried from a different network and my app loaded once then was blocked -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Deployment failing
On Jan 12, 10:07 am, Stephen Johnson onepagewo...@gmail.com wrote: +1 On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 10:53 AM, vivpuri v...@vivekpuri.com wrote: +1 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-appengine%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: stuck in loop, deploying
Same problem here also reported in the Java forum On Apr 20, 3:00 pm, martinfcasey martinfca...@gmail.com wrote: i've deployed and am getting messages rolling back, to keep waiting: Will check again in 16 seconds. Checking if new version is ready to serve. Will check again in 32 seconds. Checking if new version is ready to serve. Will check again in 60 seconds. Checking if new version is ready to serve. Will check again in 60 seconds. Checking if new version is ready to serve. Will check again in 60 seconds. Checking if new version is ready to serve. Will check again in 60 seconds. Checking if new version is ready to serve. Will check again in 60 seconds. Checking if new version is ready to serve. Will check again in 60 seconds. anyone know how to unstick? - martin - id: xinbox-crm -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Error: Server Error
I'm getting tons of Deadline Exceeded Errors also Somebody screwed something up. On Mar 19, 10:37 am, riq ricardoques...@gmail.com wrote: Did the transaction code change ? Did the DEFAULT_TRANSACTION_RETRIES change in the last update ? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Re: Is it a bad GAE day??
We are still seeing issues. It would also be nice if they did not mess with things in the middle of the US business day!! On Aug 18, 12:51 pm, thomasbohmbach thomasbohmb...@gmail.com wrote: And we're back as of ~ 2:45 central. On Aug 18, 2:26 pm, thomasbohmbach thomasbohmb...@gmail.com wrote: My sites came up briefly after the maintenance window but were down when I got back from lunch (2pm central). On Aug 18, 2:22 pm, bvelasquez bvelasq...@gmail.com wrote: All of my apps are timing out or returning deadline exceeded errors. I know they just had maintenance, but it seems like my apps are not recovering. So far, my apps are non-functional. Anyone else experiencing this? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: Gae is down ?
Seems to be just the admin... On Jun 26, 9:52 pm, Tom Wu service.g2...@gmail.com wrote: Server Error A server error has occurred. Return to Applications screen » http://appengine.google.com/ --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: Gae is down ?
I meant dashboard/admin... Also seems like a lot of extra latency for the first load.. Way more than normal On Jun 26, 9:58 pm, cz czer...@gmail.com wrote: Can't upload a new version either: 500 internal server error The dashboard is inaccessible as well. App is slow but works. On Jun 26, 9:55 pm, gg bradjyo...@gmail.com wrote: Seems to be just the admin... On Jun 26, 9:52 pm, Tom Wu service.g2...@gmail.com wrote: Server Error A server error has occurred. Return to Applications screen » http://appengine.google.com/ --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: DataStore timeout
We are seein g the same issue today. No problem in the past. Somebody tweaked something! On Apr 3, 6:14 pm, Jeff S j...@google.com wrote: Hi DarkCoiote, How rapidly are puts being made on a single entity? There is a write speed limit for a single entity or entity-group so if these puts are being made against the same person, or if puts are being made to objects which share the same parent, the put operations may queue up and eventually time out. Does this seem like it could be the issue? Thank you, Jeff On Apr 3, 5:31 am, DarkCoiote darkcoi...@gmail.com wrote: Getting a bad number of datastore timeout... and the operation is 'simple', is a put in simple model;... Traceback (most recent call last): File /base/python_lib/versions/1/google/appengine/ext/webapp/ __init__.py, line 501, in __call__ handler.get(*groups) File /base/data/home/apps/naval-war/1.332510333196150921/main.py, line 218, in get person.put() File /base/python_lib/versions/1/google/appengine/ext/db/ __init__.py, line 669, in put return datastore.Put(self._entity) File /base/python_lib/versions/1/google/appengine/api/ datastore.py, line 166, in Put raise _ToDatastoreError(err) File /base/python_lib/versions/1/google/appengine/api/ datastore.py, line 1965, in _ToDatastoreError raise errors[err.application_error](err.error_detail) Timeout person model: class Person(db.Model): id = db.StringProperty() score = db.IntegerProperty(default=0) currentFleet = db.IntegerProperty(default=0) availableShots = db.IntegerProperty(default=0) maxShots = db.IntegerProperty(default=0) shipsSunk = db.ListProperty(int,verbose_name=Sunken ships list, default=[0,0,0,0,0]) shipsLost = db.ListProperty(int,verbose_name=Lost ships list, default=[0,0,0,0,0]) lastAccess = db.DateTimeProperty(auto_now_add=True) see... no references or anything complicated any tips on how to reduce the number of datastore timeouts?? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: Disappointed with free quota changes (probably not surprising)
However, along with many performance improvements, we have learned that we were overly conservative with our initial free quota estimates. Therefore, 90 days after February 24th, 2009, we will be reducing the free quota resources. Bait and Switch. I guess it is legal since all you invested was time. Ethical? On Feb 25, 10:11 am, Brandon Thomson gra...@gmail.com wrote: I am somewhat annoyed they did not start off with the smaller quotas but it can't be helped at this point. If App Engine doesn't become profitable Google corporate will shut it down and then we will all be hosed. On Feb 24, 9:12 pm, B.J. bjp...@gmail.com wrote: I don't know that I have ever whined at an organization like Google for trying to make money. That's changing with this message. By my calculations, it could cost me $1000 over the next year to host my app that I had anticipated being hosted under the quotas. It may cost me nothing right now our usage is just under the daily CPU limits. If the traffic doesn't grow, no problem But whose goal is it for an app not to get more usage? My only real gripe is that App Engine caused me to invest a lot of effort in shoe-horning my app into the Google Way. I did that with the understanding that the trade-off was a certain amount of free hosting. Was that a promise? Of course not. Is Google under any obligation to meet my expectation? No. However, as I attempt to further optimize the application in an effort to not exceed limits, the future of the application is now in question. This is not a profit deal. I gave away my time in an effort to help an organization. Had I known this change was coming, I probably would have chosen a different solution. Because of the vendor lock-in of App Engine, the end result of all this may be simply turning the app off and letting the organization do without. (or find someone else to help them out.) Better that than hit daily free limits or find money out of someone's pocket. Look $1000/year is not a big deal for world-class hosting. I get it. I also understand that the free quotas are only there to get people hooked such as it were. I guess I wish had listened to those who said, Don't do App Engine. They'll lock you in and change the deal. It's not portable enough. Shame on me, I guess. And before people chime in with all the, You could always move it to..., or If you had just written it this way... or It's a business, of course they're trying to get you to go over the limits.. please don't. This is just a note to let the people at Google know there is a very real cost to changing the deal on people. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: Time to Ditch App Engine
So why bother with App Engine at all. In so many ways it is s limited. Just move the whole lot to Amazon! I think App Engine is destined to become Google's Edsel. On Feb 25, 9:36 am, peterk peter.ke...@gmail.com wrote: What are your requirements? If you want media or large-file hosting..perhaps you could use amazon's s3 to host your static files to overcome any bandwidth limitations on GAE's end (if you need more than 740MB per minute)? I'm assuming Amazon doesn't have rate limits or absolute bandwidth usage limits. Once you factor out your static and media files, are you really going to need more tham 740MB/minute of bandwidth? That said, 740MB/minute is over 12MB per second of bandwidth..that to me sounds pretty decent given that many dedicated servers still offer 10Mbit (1.25MB) connections to the internet! If GAE actually offers a sustained 12MB/sec of bandwidth to your clients, on the face of it, that seems pretty good? Am I missing something? For me, I'm more worried about request limits, so I plan to offload all static requests to S3 in order to reserve my request quota and bandwidth solely for the dynamic side of my app which will run on GAE. A very large portion of my requests will be for 'small'' static files, and it seems a waste to use GAE requests for those when they could be put on s3 or cloudfront. The free quota revisions are unfortunate, but things are quite scalable..once you're willing to pay, of course. But we always knew we'd have to pay for more beyond the free quotas! They never suggested scalability to the nth degree for free.. :) On Feb 25, 8:42 am, cc c...@gamegiants.net wrote: It looks like the accountants at Google have taken over If you read over the new bandwidth quotes you will find that what was to be scalable is not so anymore: Outgoing Bandwidth (adjustable, includes HTTPS) 10 GByte 56 MByte/ min 10 GByte free (plus budgeted adjustment up to 1046 GBytes/day) 740 MByte/min 56 MByte/min 740 MByte/min wow talk about limited! And don't forget to read all the way to the bottom of the page: The new quota levels, which will take effect on May 25th, 2009, are: * CPU Time: 6.5 hours of CPU time per day * Bandwidth: 1 Gigabyte of data transferred in and out of the application per day * Stored Data Email Recipients: these quotas will remain unchanged. These changes may also affect the fixed quotas applied to applications without billing enabled. Fixed quotas for applications with billing enabled will not be affected. Bandwidth: 1 Gigabyte of data transferred in and out of the application per day Your joking right? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: Google Checkout
Yep cp.appspot.com On Feb 21, 9:03 am, herbie 4whi...@o2.co.uk wrote: Hi, There have been a few messages about GAE and Checkout, but has anyone sucessfuly used Checkout with GAE? Could anyone recommend another 'easy' way to allow users to pay through a GAE powerd app? Many thanks --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: When do the new limits go live?
You need to upgrade to SDK 1.1.9 to take advantage of the new limits. Version 1.1.9 - February 2, 2009 * HTTP Request and Response limit raised to 10MB from 1MB. Note that API call limits remain at 1MB. o http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=78 * urllib and urllib2 now available, implemented using urlfetch. Also adds additional stubs which may enable other modules. o http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=61 o http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=68 o http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=572 o http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=821 * Early release of a new data bulk upload tool, bulkloader.py o http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/python/tools/uploadingdata.html * New remote_api for datastore at google.appengine.ext.remote_api * Single property descending indexes are automatically generated. * Added db.Query support for IN and != operators. o http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=751 * Fixed issue where gql date/time parsing could not handle Unicode strings. * Fixed issue with db model instance key() returning the wrong key for unsaved instances with parent as key o http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=883 * New run_in_transaction_custom_retries method for datastore. * Fixed issue with relative dev_appserver datastore and history paths. o http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=845 * Static files and skipped files are not readable in dev_appserver, to match the behavior on App Engine. o http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=550 * Images API allows multiple transforms of the same type in one request. A limit of 10 total transforms per request has been added. * PIL import will work with both PIL.Image and Image. o http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=929 * Fixed an issue with sending email in dev_appserver when the application code changed. o http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=182 * Memcache counters (incr/decr) do nothing on non positive integers to match the behavior on App Engine. o http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=918 On Feb 13, 9:00 am, Marzia Niccolai ma...@google.com wrote: Hi, The new limits are now live, but keep in mind the API request size restrictions are still in place. This means URLFetch requests/responses are still currently limited to 1MB, as well as datastore entity size, etc. -Marzia On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 6:10 AM, Carter Rabasa carter.rab...@gmail.comwrote: I am currently getting a urlfetch.ResponseTooLargeError on an attempt to retrieve a 1.5MB file. I figure it will take time to roll-out the changes to all instances, any idea when the push will be complete? Thanks, Carter Rabasa http://www.socialdm.com --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: SDK version 1.1.9 Released
Am I missing something??? bulkload.Loader has been around since release? What is new with remote api the name and the docs? On Feb 10, 11:28 am, Dan Sanderson dansander...@google.com wrote: There's no need to rewrite existing URL Fetch calls. httplib support is just intended to make it easier to use other libraries that depend on httplib/urllib/urllib2. The HTTP referrer issue you mention has been acknowledged. I don't have any information on its status to report, but I feel your pain. :) -- Dan On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 7:45 AM, jordisan ram...@gmail.com wrote: Dan, so there's no need to rewrite our URL Fetch calls to get more performance or functionalities, is there? And I guess this issue is still open: http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=445 Are you working on this? We need to set/unset HTTP-referer to connect to remote APIs as Delicious or Twitter. Thanks. On Feb 10, 7:52 am, Dan Sanderson dansander...@google.com wrote: Correct, all of the functionality and restrictions of the URL Fetch service apply to the httplib interfaces. -- Dan On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 6:33 PM, gesteves gfeste...@gmail.com wrote: Quick question: The docs state that You can use the Python standard libraries urllib, urllib2 or httplib to make HTTP requests. When running in App Engine, these libraries perform HTTP requests using App Engine's URL fetch service, which runs on Google's scalable HTTP request infrastructure. Does that mean that changing the user-agent header is still not allowed, even when using one of Python's standard libraries? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: How to fix pickling error
Same problem here on:
econe.appspot.com
bwork.appspot.com
On Nov 12, 9:41 am, Marzia Niccolai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
What is the error that you are seeing? And what are you trying to add to
Memcache?
Our engineers are looking in to fixing this issue with Memcache, but it's
usually not advisable to put a query object in Memcache, one almost always
wants to store the results of the query. If this is not the cause of the
issue you are seeing, please let me know.
-Marzia
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 5:48 AM, sirdarckcat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
Im having the same problem on adding stuff to memcache!
The error log shows it started 10 hours ago, and it hasnt been fixed
since then.
Do you guys think it'll be fixed?
Greetings!!
On Nov 12, 12:48 am, benben [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First ,thanks Marzia Niccolai for his email .
Today ,my app get picklingerror. Lot's of those errors in admin
control panel .
PicklingError: Can't pickle type 'instancemethod': it's not found
as __builtin__.instancemethod
This error throw out when set a query object into memcache .
Do not use Link.all().order('-weight') to get all the data in Link
table , just use Link.gql('ORDER BY weight desc').fetch(100). it
will fix this error .
good luck .
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: How to fix pickling error
Helpful error : )
back-references modelname_set is a query
On Nov 12, 9:50 am, Marzia Niccolai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you are seeing this error message in your logs:
PicklingError: Can't pickle type 'instancemethod': it's not found as
__builtin__.instancemethod
This indicates that you are storing a query object in Memcache, which is
currently causing issues. The fix that benben suggested will fix this
issue.
-Marzia
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 9:45 AM, gg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Same problem here on:
econe.appspot.com
bwork.appspot.com
On Nov 12, 9:41 am, Marzia Niccolai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
What is the error that you are seeing? And what are you trying to add to
Memcache?
Our engineers are looking in to fixing this issue with Memcache, but it's
usually not advisable to put a query object in Memcache, one almost
always
wants to store the results of the query. If this is not the cause of the
issue you are seeing, please let me know.
-Marzia
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 5:48 AM, sirdarckcat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi!
Im having the same problem on adding stuff to memcache!
The error log shows it started 10 hours ago, and it hasnt been fixed
since then.
Do you guys think it'll be fixed?
Greetings!!
On Nov 12, 12:48 am, benben [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First ,thanks Marzia Niccolai for his email .
Today ,my app get picklingerror. Lot's of those errors in admin
control panel .
PicklingError: Can't pickle type 'instancemethod': it's not found
as __builtin__.instancemethod
This error throw out when set a query object into memcache .
Do not use Link.all().order('-weight') to get all the data in Link
table , just use Link.gql('ORDER BY weight desc').fetch(100). it
will fix this error .
good luck .
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Is GAE Horribly Broken?
Ok, so from previous threads it is always the poster who is thought to be at fault for the problems with GAE. It is always stated that the poster must be doing something wrong, writing bad code, or not writing a scalable application So going on the assumption that the Google employee that codes the dashboard and the data viewer is not doing something wrong: Why does the data viewer consistently crash whenever you try to paginate through more than 7 pages (140 entities) giving: Server Error A server error has occured. Return to Applications screen » This would seem to suggest that it is the architecture that is lacking, and not the programmers using it. (I have reproduced this on 3 different apps, I am assuming that the problem is universal) --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: Timeout - operation took too long
I am also seeing a lot of time spent in WAIT? Sometimes as much as 3/4
of total CPU for any given set of calls! Has the datastore latency
issue mentioned above been resolved?
Here is an example from a profile run:
ncalls tottime percall cumtime percall filename:lineno(function)
110.6490.0590.9370.085
{google3.apphosting.runtime._apphosting_runtime___python__apiproxy.Wait}
On Oct 2, 2:33 pm, Sylvain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How can we help for this ?
Each day, I've several Timeout.
Do you still need more info about it (date,time, app_id,...) ?
Regards
On 30 sep, 18:57, johnP [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For a while today, I started seeing errors in custom form validation.
Requesting self.instance in ModelForm form resulted in ValueErrors.
Now, it seems to have recovered a bit...
On Sep 30, 9:43 am, Adam Loving [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am seeing the datastoretimeouterror intermittently several times a
day (application = toyvirtualgifts) on a fairly simple put operation.
Could this be caused by the rest of the request taking too long (like
if thetimeoutfor the entire request fires during the put)? It
doesn't seem like that would be the case here, but that's the only
explanation I can think of.
File /base/python_lib/versions/1/google/appengine/ext/db/
__init__.py, line 618, in put
return datastore.Put(self._entity)
File /base/python_lib/versions/1/google/appengine/api/
datastore.py, line 162, in Put
raise _ToDatastoreError(err)
File /base/python_lib/versions/1/google/appengine/api/
datastore.py, line 1627, in _ToDatastoreError
raise errors[err.application_error](err.error_detail)
Timeout
Thanks,
Adam
On Sep 28, 3:19 am, Ronald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I don't know how much work has been done on this front, but my app is
still cripple by this issue.
Maybe the amount oftimeouterrors in the log has decrease a little,
but so has the amount of happy users of my site =(
/ronald
On Sep 19, 9:45 pm, Marzia Niccolai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Our engineers are looking in to your reports.
If all of the people experiencing quota issues like this could email
me
directly with your application id, as well as the approximate times
these
errors were occurring, that would be helpful!
Thanks,
Marzia
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 11:17 AM, Michael Bailey [EMAIL
PROTECTED]wrote:
I got the error below on a app that has almost zero traffic:
see screenshot:
http://imagebin.ca/img/3rlwzkBy.png
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /base/python_lib/versions/1/google/appengine/ext/webapp/
__init__.py, line 496, in __call__
handler.get(*groups)
File /base/data/home/apps/***/1.4/search.py, line 25, in get
for kw in kws:
File /base/python_lib/versions/1/google/appengine/ext/db/
__init__.py, line 1257, in __iter__
return self.run()
File /base/python_lib/versions/1/google/appengine/ext/db/
__init__.py, line 1589, in run
query_run = self._proto_query.Run(*self._args, **self._kwds)
File /base/python_lib/versions/1/google/appengine/ext/gql/
__init__.py, line 572, in Run
it = bind_results.Run()
File /base/python_lib/versions/1/google/appengine/ext/gql/
__init__.py, line 1211, in Run
results.append(bound_query.Run())
File /base/python_lib/versions/1/google/appengine/api/
datastore.py, line 860, in Run
return self._Run()
File /base/python_lib/versions/1/google/appengine/api/
datastore.py, line 879, in _Run
apiproxy_stub_map.MakeSyncCall('datastore_v3', 'RunQuery', pb,
result)
File /base/python_lib/versions/1/google/appengine/api/
apiproxy_stub_map.py, line 46, in MakeSyncCall
stub.MakeSyncCall(service, call, request, response)
File /base/python_lib/versions/1/google/appengine/runtime/
apiproxy.py, line 246, in MakeSyncCall
rpc.CheckSuccess()
File /base/python_lib/versions/1/google/appengine/runtime/
apiproxy.py, line 189, in CheckSuccess
raise self.exception
OverQuotaError: The API call datastore_v3.RunQuery() required more
quota than is available.
On Sep 10, 1:16 pm, Ronald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm seeing a number ofTimeouterrors on my log file:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /base/python_lib/versions/1/google/appengine/ext/webapp/
__init__.py, line 496, in __call__
handler.get(*groups)
File /base/data/home/apps/40tazo/2.29/index.py, line 46, in
get
moves = g.move(card,pickups)
File /base/data/home/apps/40tazo/2.29/game.py, line 231, in
move
self.save()
File /base/data/home/apps/40tazo/2.29/game.py,
[google-appengine] Did Something Change Since Yesterday which now Requires Additional Indexes?
As stated in the title: Did Something Change Since Yesterday which would now Requires Additional Indexes? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: Did Something Change Since Yesterday which now Requires Additional Indexes?
Now I am totally hosed. Tried to add the needed index (which seemed to be in the new 1.1.4 format and I am running 1.1.1) it caused an error. I vacuumed the indexes and tried to regenerate. When I do ALL indexes now do not rebuild and show in error status?? What is up with that? On Oct 2, 12:07 am, gg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As stated in the title: Did Something Change Since Yesterday which would now Requires Additional Indexes? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
