Re: [appengine-java] Re: Datastore Statistics not updated for 3 days
Sounds good. I received an email shortly after notifying our production team that they had addressed the issue. On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 10:12 PM, Toby toby.ro...@gmail.com wrote: Hello Ikai, Everything is back to normal. Thank you, Toby On May 11, 1:08 am, Ikai L (Google) ika...@google.com wrote: Seems like you aren't the only one reporting this. Let me see if I can chase down what's going on. On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 8:56 AM, Toby toby.ro...@gmail.com wrote: now it is: 4 days, 12:34:38 ago I checked my other appengine applications and they are all about the same. On May 9, 2:25 pm, Toby toby.ro...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I have some trouble with the Administration Console. Everything is very slow. Sometimes I get error page. The Datastore Statistics say: Last updated 3 days, 17:59:52 ago on the right it says that there is at least one update per day. So I am puzzled. Maybe my application got corrupted? What can I do? Toby -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-appengine-java%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com google-appengine-java%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-appengine-java%252bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group athttp:// groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-appengine-java%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com google-appengine-java%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-appengine-java%252bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en. -- Ikai Lan Developer Relations, Google App Engine Twitter:http://twitter.com/ikai Delicious:http://delicious.com/ikailan Google App Engine links: Blog:http://googleappengine.blogspot.com Twitter:http://twitter.com/app_engine Reddit:http://www.reddit.com/r/appengine -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-appengine-java%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group athttp:// groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-appengine-java%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en. -- Ikai Lan Developer Relations, Google App Engine Twitter: http://twitter.com/ikai Delicious: http://delicious.com/ikailan Google App Engine links: Blog: http://googleappengine.blogspot.com Twitter: http://twitter.com/app_engine Reddit: http://www.reddit.com/r/appengine -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
Re: [appengine-java] is the 1000 file limit still apply
The limit is now 3000 files: http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=161#c86 http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=161#c86Yes, this includes classes as well as static files. You've guessed correctly: you can use JAR files to cram more class files into your deployment package. On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 11:03 PM, Joe Fawzy joewic...@gmail.com wrote: Hi is the 1000 file limit still apply? is that number for static files or for all files including class files? how to overcome it? use jar? can i upload my war file? thanks Joe -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-appengine-java%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en. -- Ikai Lan Developer Relations, Google App Engine Twitter: http://twitter.com/ikai Delicious: http://delicious.com/ikailan Google App Engine links: Blog: http://googleappengine.blogspot.com Twitter: http://twitter.com/app_engine Reddit: http://www.reddit.com/r/appengine -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
[appengine-java] Re: composit primary key issue
You can combine two fields in one string-field and use it as String PK
On 11 май, 14:14, aptest1 actiprocess apte...@gmail.com wrote:
We are unable to use two fileds as the compisit primary keys in google
datastore, its throwing follwing exception if we make two fields as
primary key fileds.please help us to resolve this iusse
our company class has two primary keys as below, we are using
companyId,docId as primary keys
***
@PersistenceCapable(identityType=IdentityType.DATASTORE)
public class Company{
�...@primarykey
@Persistent(valueStrategy = IdGeneratorStrategy.SEQUENCE)
private Long companyId;
@PrimaryKey
String docId
}
if we start the server we are getting the following Exception :
***
*s
May 11, 2010 10:07:31 AM
org.datanucleus.metadata.AbstractClassMetaData determineObjectIdClass
SEVERE: Class com.atp.smartstore.DB.config.User has application-
identity and no objectid-class specified yet has 2 primary key fields.
Unable to use SingleFieldIdentity.
Class com.atp.smartstore.DB.config.User has application-identity and
no objectid-class specified yet has 2 primary key fields. Unable to
use SingleFieldIdentity.
May 11, 2010 10:07:31 AM org.datanucleus.enhancer.DataNucleusEnhancer
main
SEVERE: DataNucleus Enhancer completed with an error. Please review
the enhancer log for full details. Some classes may have been enhanced
but some caused errors
Class com.atp.smartstore.DB.config.User has application-identity and
no objectid-class specified yet has 2 primary key fields. Unable to
use SingleFieldIdentity.
org.datanucleus.metadata.InvalidMetaDataException: Class
com.atp.smartstore.DB.config.User has application-identity and no
objectid-class specified yet has 2 primary key fields. Unable to use
SingleFieldIdentity.
at
org.datanucleus.metadata.AbstractClassMetaData.determineObjectIdClass(Abstr
actClassMetaData.java:
1032)
at org.datanucleus.metadata.ClassMetaData.populate(ClassMetaData.java:
205)
at org.datanucleus.metadata.MetaDataManager
$1.run(MetaDataManager.java:2317)
at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
at
org.datanucleus.metadata.MetaDataManager.populateAbstractClassMetaData(Meta
DataManager.java:
2311)
at
org.datanucleus.metadata.MetaDataManager.populateFileMetaData(MetaDataManag
er.java:
2148)
at
org.datanucleus.metadata.MetaDataManager.initialiseFileMetaDataForUse(MetaD
ataManager.java:
864)
at
org.datanucleus.metadata.MetaDataManager.loadClasses(MetaDataManager.java:
433)
at
org.datanucleus.enhancer.DataNucleusEnhancer.getFileMetadataForInput(DataNu
cleusEnhancer.java:
743)
at
org.datanucleus.enhancer.DataNucleusEnhancer.enhance(DataNucleusEnhancer.ja
va:
545)
at
org.datanucleus.enhancer.DataNucleusEnhancer.main(DataNucleusEnhancer.java:
1252)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:
39)
at
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImp
l.java:
25)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585)
at com.google.appengine.tools.enhancer.Enhancer.execute(Enhancer.java:
57)
at com.google.appengine.tools.enhancer.Enhance.init(Enhance.java:
60)
at com.google.appengine.tools.enhancer.Enhance.main(Enhance.java:41)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine for Java group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group
athttp://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine for Java group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
[appengine-java] Re: is createFederatedLoginURL() working?
I also trying to use this. In my case, I want to log in via my apps domain id (ex: exampl...@example.com), So HashSetString attributes = new HashSet(); attributes.add(openid.mode=checkid_immediate); attributes.add(openid.ns=http://specs.openid.net/auth/2.0;); attributes.add(openid.return_to=http://example.com;); userService.createFederatedLoginURL(example.com , requestUri, example.com, attributes)); And From this, created link is : http://example.com/_ah/login_redir?claimid=example.comcontinue=http://example.com/ When I clicked that link, it redirect to my apps domain login page, but after login complete it redirect to example.com but page not found error occured. I changed above link with modification and find claimid=example.com part is correct but continue=http://example.com/ is incorrect. But I can't figure out correct input. On 4월7일, 오전3시56분, Viðar Svansson vidarsv...@gmail.com wrote: Hi I just noticedcreateFederatedLoginURL() but could not find any documentation for it (except for JavaDoc). Is this intended for native support for Google Marketplace? Would really appreciate some documentation on this. I am trying this out in 1.3.2 but get an error, The API package 'user' or call 'CreateFederatedLoginURL()' was not found. Viðar On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 10:27 AM, dflorey daniel.flo...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I'm trying to replace the Step2 stuff with the new createFederatedLoginURL(), but I just get server errors in the provided /_ah/ servlets. Are these methods supposed to work and can someone please post an example how to authenticate and authorize a user? Thanks a lot, Daniel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.- 원본 텍스트 숨기기 - - 원본 텍스트 보기 - -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
[appengine-java] Potential bug with jetty JspFactory
See this thread for details http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=628524.81703.qm%40web95503.mail.in.yahoo.comforum_name=freemarker-devel I am using freemarker + sitemesh. The decorator is a jsp file where as actual pages are written in JSP. That mean i am mixing JSP and freemarker with JSP taglibs in same project. Every request will cause to render both freemarker templates and jsp(decorator) as the ftl template output will be decorated by a jsp file. This is fine and works normally but not on GAE unless I execute a JSP file before any freemarker templates are executed. Here's when it works - I created a hello.jsp file directly under root - Deploy the application to cloud - call the hello.jsp file by typing the url in browser - That's it, from now onward every thing will work as Jetty would have registered it's own JspFactory. However if I don't do this, it won't work and give errors. See this thread for more details http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=628524.81703.qm%40web95503.mail.in.yahoo.comforum_name=freemarker-devel -- Sudhir Ramanandi http://www.ramanandi.org -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
RE: [appengine-java] Billed CPU time by far too high
Hi Ikai, it's also possible that you were being *underbilled* previously and that we've corrected billing information. that is quite interesting. Google just can decide that someone is underbilled so he/she has to pay an extra 700% on CPU time. So not everyone has to pay the same for the same good. I think that this is quite ridiculous. Probably it does not make sense to invest in this platform anymore but better develop my software on another cloud service like Amazon. Henning Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 08:40:22 +0200 Subject: Re: [appengine-java] Billed CPU time by far too high From: ika...@google.com To: google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com If you are actually being billed, you'd fill out this form right here: http://code.google.com/appengine/kb/billing.html 1.3 CPU hours is still significantly under the free quota, so this probably wouldn't be an option for you. I'd advise running AppStats to profile where all the additional CPU usage is coming from. This information would be extremely helpful both to you as well as to other developers who may experience the same issues. Without knowing additional information, it's also possible that you were being *underbilled* previously and that we've corrected billing information. On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 10:08 AM, Henning henning2...@hotmail.de wrote: Hello, I posted about this topic already 2 weeks ago. The days after that my website got back to its normal levels of CPU time. But then things got even worse. What can I do now? How can I let the responsible developers at Google let know to fix it. The situation is as follows: I have a cron job that is triggered every minute. It has an average CPU usage of 56(17) according to the dash board. On the black list I cannot see any requests other than my cron job. It is nearly the only thing that needs CPU time. Normally what I got billed everyday was about 0.2 CPU hrs a day. In the meantime it is about 1.3 CPU hrs a day! That is more than 1/5 of the free quota just for this lightweight cron job! Henning -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en. -- Ikai Lan Developer Relations, Google App EngineTwitter: http://twitter.com/ikaiDelicious: http://delicious.com/ikailan Google App Engine links: Blog: http://googleappengine.blogspot.com Twitter: http://twitter.com/app_engine Reddit: http://www.reddit.com/r/appengine -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en. _ http://redirect.gimas.net/?n=M1004xjajah2 Über Messenger günstiger telefonieren? Sagen Sie Ja zu JAJAH! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
[appengine-java] Re: composit primary key issue
Hi datanucleus, Built-in object id classes not working in Google data store,we worked as example given in the fallowing url http://www.datanucleus.org/products/accessplatform/jdo/primary_key.html. but issue not resolved. Thanks On May 11, 10:02 pm, datanucleus andy_jeffer...@yahoo.com wrote: Class com.atp.smartstore.DB.config.User has application-identity and no objectid-class specified yet has 2 primary key fields. Unable to use SingleFieldIdentity. Message seems clear enough to me. You want to have a composite PK yet you haven't provided an object identity class; so provide one. JDO only provides built-in object id classes when you have a single field as PK. The DataNucleus docs define how to define your own. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
[appengine-java] Re: composit primary key issue
Built-in object id classes not working in Google data store, Well they are working fine actually ... but as I already said you're using more than 1 field and THERE IS NO BUILTIN object id for composite id. we worked as example given in the fallowing url http://www.datanucleus.org/products/accessplatform/jdo/primary_key.html. but issue not resolved. Works for me. Works for the JDO TCK. Saying something doesn't work would probably require a comment of what doesn't work otherwise its not of much help -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
[appengine-java] Re: Billed CPU time by far too high
Henning, you must have misunderstood Ikai’s answer :-) You were given discount previously and now you are billed as others ;-) On May 12, 1:58 pm, Henning Dierolf henning2...@hotmail.de wrote: Hi Ikai, it's also possible that you were being *underbilled* previously and that we've corrected billing information. that is quite interesting. Google just can decide that someone is underbilled so he/she has to pay an extra 700% on CPU time. So not everyone has to pay the same for the same good. I think that this is quite ridiculous. Probably it does not make sense to invest in this platform anymore but better develop my software on another cloud service like Amazon. Henning Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 08:40:22 +0200 Subject: Re: [appengine-java] Billed CPU time by far too high From: ika...@google.com To: google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com If you are actually being billed, you'd fill out this form right here:http://code.google.com/appengine/kb/billing.html 1.3 CPU hours is still significantly under the free quota, so this probably wouldn't be an option for you. I'd advise running AppStats to profile where all the additional CPU usage is coming from. This information would be extremely helpful both to you as well as to other developers who may experience the same issues. Without knowing additional information, it's also possible that you were being *underbilled* previously and that we've corrected billing information. On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 10:08 AM, Henning henning2...@hotmail.de wrote: Hello, I posted about this topic already 2 weeks ago. The days after that my website got back to its normal levels of CPU time. But then things got even worse. What can I do now? How can I let the responsible developers at Google let know to fix it. The situation is as follows: I have a cron job that is triggered every minute. It has an average CPU usage of 56(17) according to the dash board. On the black list I cannot see any requests other than my cron job. It is nearly the only thing that needs CPU time. Normally what I got billed everyday was about 0.2 CPU hrs a day. In the meantime it is about 1.3 CPU hrs a day! That is more than 1/5 of the free quota just for this lightweight cron job! Henning -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en. -- Ikai Lan Developer Relations, Google App EngineTwitter:http://twitter.com/ikaiDelicious:http://delicious.com/ikailan Google App Engine links: Blog:http://googleappengine.blogspot.comTwitter:http://twitter.com/app_engine Reddit:http://www.reddit.com/r/appengine -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en. _http://redirect.gimas.net/?n=M1004xjajah2 Über Messenger günstiger telefonieren? Sagen Sie Ja zu JAJAH! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
[appengine-java] Re: Is there an equivalent of Python GeoModel project in Java?
Hi,
geocellsP is taken from code example in HowToUseGeocell.java (in
commented code). I'm a newbe with GAE, and solving puzzles like that
makes me upset. For example 'Query' was commented, and I even not sure
if I imported right Query class (had after uncommenting code) -
eclipse suggested several of them in different packages and at least 2
of them looks like from GAE.
After my modifications I have following code:
--
String queryString = select from +Metka.class.getName()+ where
geocellsP.contains(geocells);
Query query = pm.newQuery(queryString);
query.declareParameters(String geocellsP);
ListMetka objects = (ListMetka) query.execute(cells);
--
But it returns all 'Metka' entities though 'cells' list doesn't have
as many entries as 'objects' has. I think I'm doing something wrong,
but do not know what (( Please advice.
My Metka class is:
@PersistenceCapable
public class Metka implements LocationCapable {
@PrimaryKey
@Persistent(valueStrategy = IdGeneratorStrategy.IDENTITY)
private Key id;
@Persistent
private ListString geocells;
...
TIA,
Mike
On Apr 10, 10:17 pm, Alex alexandre.gellib...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Christian,
1. your exception looks weird. I'm using the library with this kind of
class:
@PersistenceCapable(identityType = IdentityType.APPLICATION)
public class User {
@PrimaryKey
@Persistent(valueStrategy = IdGeneratorStrategy.IDENTITY)
private Key key;
@Persistent
private ListString geocells;}
... and it works well.
2. the min/max resolution of cells may be changed if you pass a
CostFunction as parameter (it tells the algorithm when searching for
bigger cells: when the cost raises, it stops). Also, since I did the
java portage of python Geomodel library, I'd be interested in the
false positives cells you get. Can you give me an example of input
that fails?
3. Your query in the example seems to be wrong, you're declaring
geocellsP as a parameter, but it does not exist in the request.
I've recently updated the library (and added the proximity fetch
search). Please post an issue if something does not look ok.
++
Alex
On Mar 1, 8:09 pm, Torquester christian.schloem...@gmail.com wrote:
I tried out the Java Geomodelhttp://code.google.com/p/javageomodel/
The query used in the example provided on the project page seems
strange to me. The example uses a ListString parameter (containing
the cells of the bounding box) and passes it to a query which filters
the ListString (geocells) property of the entity class. When I
execute that query I get following error: Collection parameters are
only supported when filtering on primary key.
Is it possible to have a query in appengine where the entity has a
ListString property (which is not a primary key) and you want to
know if that property contains one of the values provided by a second
ListString?
I'm also wondering if the resolution of the cells can be changed. The
results I get are inaccurate (I'm getting some false positives when I
do a bounding box search).
class GeoObject {
@Persistent
ListString geocells;
...
}
// Transform this to a bounding box
BoundingBox bb = new BoundingBox(latNE, lonNE, latSW, lonSW);
// Calculate the geocells list to be used in the queries (optimize
list of cells that complete the given bounding box)
ListString cells = Geocell.best_bbox_search_cells(bb, null);
// In Google App Engine, you'll have something like below. In
hibernate (or whatever else), it might be a little bit different.
String queryString = select from GeoObject where
geocellsParameter.contains(geocells);
Query query = pm.newQuery(query);
query.declareParameters(String geocellsParameter);
query.declareParameters(String geocellsP);
ListGeoObject objects = (ListGeoObject) query.execute(cells);
On Feb 8, 11:24 pm, Ikai L (Google) ika...@google.com wrote:
Looks like someone ported the Python code to Java for GeoHash:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2060219/google-app-engine-geohashing
Also seems like a pretty good explanation of GeoHashing in general.
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 10:16 AM, mianor lefebvre.rom...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to implement geolocation search with GAE in Java using
GeoPt.
But due to restrictions on Datastore, bounding box queries are also
not supported in App Engine because there need to be two inequalities
on two independent properties (latitude and longitude).
There seems to be a solution with Geohash but every thing I found is
based on GAE Python. Is there anything based on Java or can I use
Geomodel (http://code.google.com/p/geomodel/) from Python in my Java
applications?
Thanks for your help!
Romain
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups
Google App Engine for Java group.
To post to this group, send email to
[appengine-java] I created a JUnit runner for the Production Server.
hi I'm bufferings. I created a JUnit runner which can run tests on the Production Server and the Development Server. The name of the application is Kotori Web JUnit Runner. The shortened name is ktrwjr. ktrwjr is a JUnit runner web application for GAE/j. It helps to run your tests on the Production Server and the Development Server. Haven't you ever wanted to execute your tests on the Production Server? With ktrwjr, you can do it easily. http://code.google.com/p/ktrwjr/ cheers -- bufferings -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
Re: [appengine-java] Re: Google maps geocoder responds with 620 error since server maintenance
Hi culov. I believe this was largely addressed on Monday. Please let me know if you continue to see any other geocoding problems, and, if possible, include your Maps API key (you can send this to me privately if you prefer). - Jason On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 12:32 PM, culov cul...@gmail.com wrote: app engine servers still look to be blacklisted On May 7, 3:16 pm, culov cul...@gmail.com wrote: It happened on Feb. 19, after server maintenance, and it's happened again. I'm getting non-stop 620 errors whenever I try to geocode from an app engine server. I'd be very grateful if this could be fixed before the weekend! Thanks! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-appengine-java%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group athttp:// groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-appengine-java%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
[appengine-java] Re: Google maps geocoder responds with 620 error since server maintenance
I, too, have seen recent 620s, using from python as well. I've even added 1 second delays between my requests to try and mitigate this - but it has not helped. FWIW, a few times a day this does not happen - but the vast majority of the time, this is a problem. C On May 9, 12:32 pm, culov cul...@gmail.com wrote: app engine servers still look to be blacklisted On May 7, 3:16 pm, culov cul...@gmail.com wrote: It happened on Feb. 19, after server maintenance, and it's happened again. I'm getting non-stop 620 errors whenever I try to geocode from an app engine server. I'd be very grateful if this could be fixed before the weekend! Thanks! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
Re: [appengine-java] Re: Billed CPU time by far too high
Yes, you've misunderstood me. You're also certainly welcome to build your application on a competing platform. We'd welcome the feedback as well as an apples-to-apples cost comparison. I'll point out, though, that 1.3 CPU hours a day incurs no cost. You'd have the same issue on any other platform provider: if something costs more, you'd be advised to collect data to try to scientifically determine the cost of the increase. On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 3:08 PM, Peter Ondruska peter.ondru...@gmail.comwrote: Henning, you must have misunderstood Ikai’s answer :-) You were given discount previously and now you are billed as others ;-) On May 12, 1:58 pm, Henning Dierolf henning2...@hotmail.de wrote: Hi Ikai, it's also possible that you were being *underbilled* previously and that we've corrected billing information. that is quite interesting. Google just can decide that someone is underbilled so he/she has to pay an extra 700% on CPU time. So not everyone has to pay the same for the same good. I think that this is quite ridiculous. Probably it does not make sense to invest in this platform anymore but better develop my software on another cloud service like Amazon. Henning Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 08:40:22 +0200 Subject: Re: [appengine-java] Billed CPU time by far too high From: ika...@google.com To: google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com If you are actually being billed, you'd fill out this form right here: http://code.google.com/appengine/kb/billing.html 1.3 CPU hours is still significantly under the free quota, so this probably wouldn't be an option for you. I'd advise running AppStats to profile where all the additional CPU usage is coming from. This information would be extremely helpful both to you as well as to other developers who may experience the same issues. Without knowing additional information, it's also possible that you were being *underbilled* previously and that we've corrected billing information. On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 10:08 AM, Henning henning2...@hotmail.de wrote: Hello, I posted about this topic already 2 weeks ago. The days after that my website got back to its normal levels of CPU time. But then things got even worse. What can I do now? How can I let the responsible developers at Google let know to fix it. The situation is as follows: I have a cron job that is triggered every minute. It has an average CPU usage of 56(17) according to the dash board. On the black list I cannot see any requests other than my cron job. It is nearly the only thing that needs CPU time. Normally what I got billed everyday was about 0.2 CPU hrs a day. In the meantime it is about 1.3 CPU hrs a day! That is more than 1/5 of the free quota just for this lightweight cron job! Henning -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-appengine-java%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group athttp:// groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en. -- Ikai Lan Developer Relations, Google App EngineTwitter: http://twitter.com/ikaiDelicious:http://delicious.com/ikailan Google App Engine links: Blog:http://googleappengine.blogspot.comTwitter:http:// twitter.com/app_engine Reddit:http://www.reddit.com/r/appengine -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-appengine-java%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group athttp:// groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en. _ http://redirect.gimas.net/?n=M1004xjajah2 Über Messenger günstiger telefonieren? Sagen Sie Ja zu JAJAH! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-appengine-java%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group athttp:// groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
Re: [appengine-java] Billed CPU time by far too high
Are you really getting upset over some arbitrary numbers on a service you aren't even paying for? Jeff On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 4:58 AM, Henning Dierolf henning2...@hotmail.de wrote: Hi Ikai, it's also possible that you were being *underbilled* previously and that we've corrected billing information. that is quite interesting. Google just can decide that someone is underbilled so he/she has to pay an extra 700% on CPU time. So not everyone has to pay the same for the same good. I think that this is quite ridiculous. Probably it does not make sense to invest in this platform anymore but better develop my software on another cloud service like Amazon. Henning Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 08:40:22 +0200 Subject: Re: [appengine-java] Billed CPU time by far too high From: ika...@google.com To: google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com If you are actually being billed, you'd fill out this form right here: http://code.google.com/appengine/kb/billing.html 1.3 CPU hours is still significantly under the free quota, so this probably wouldn't be an option for you. I'd advise running AppStats to profile where all the additional CPU usage is coming from. This information would be extremely helpful both to you as well as to other developers who may experience the same issues. Without knowing additional information, it's also possible that you were being *underbilled* previously and that we've corrected billing information. On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 10:08 AM, Henning henning2...@hotmail.de wrote: Hello, I posted about this topic already 2 weeks ago. The days after that my website got back to its normal levels of CPU time. But then things got even worse. What can I do now? How can I let the responsible developers at Google let know to fix it. The situation is as follows: I have a cron job that is triggered every minute. It has an average CPU usage of 56(17) according to the dash board. On the black list I cannot see any requests other than my cron job. It is nearly the only thing that needs CPU time. Normally what I got billed everyday was about 0.2 CPU hrs a day. In the meantime it is about 1.3 CPU hrs a day! That is more than 1/5 of the free quota just for this lightweight cron job! Henning -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en. -- Ikai Lan Developer Relations, Google App Engine Twitter: http://twitter.com/ikai Delicious: http://delicious.com/ikailan Google App Engine links: Blog: http://googleappengine.blogspot.com Twitter: http://twitter.com/app_engine Reddit: http://www.reddit.com/r/appengine -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en. Über Messenger günstiger telefonieren? Sagen Sie Ja zu JAJAH! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
[appengine-java] Re: Viewing Emails in dev using log4j
Eurig - Did you find it? Its probably not log4j due to app engine using java.util.logging.Logger technology. I am also interested in where this log file is. I'm using Eclipse which is monitoring the log output and see nothing there. Is there another log I'm unaware of? I would assume it would be in the WEB-INF/appengine-generated directory but nothing shows there. --Stevko On Apr 5, 3:20 am, Eurig Jones eurigjo...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, From http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/java/mail/overview.html#Develop... ... When an application running in the developmentservercalls the Mail service to send an email message, the message is printed to thelog. The Java developmentserverdoes not send the email message. My question is, what log4j setup do I use to output these emails? Regards, Eurig Jones -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
Re: [appengine-java] Re: Google maps geocoder responds with 620 error since server maintenance
Can you send us your API key that's getting throttled? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
Re: [appengine-java] Billed CPU time by far too high
Many of us sit in limbo Jeff. We're waiting for cold-start, start-up, and billing and general 'cloud' concerns to be assuaged before we push clients towards this stack. Thus something that is free now, is useful experience when considering the huge deployments to GAE/J. - Paul On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 2:32 PM, Jeff Schnitzer j...@infohazard.org wrote: Are you really getting upset over some arbitrary numbers on a service you aren't even paying for? Jeff On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 4:58 AM, Henning Dierolf henning2...@hotmail.de wrote: Hi Ikai, it's also possible that you were being *underbilled* previously and that we've corrected billing information. that is quite interesting. Google just can decide that someone is underbilled so he/she has to pay an extra 700% on CPU time. So not everyone has to pay the same for the same good. I think that this is quite ridiculous. Probably it does not make sense to invest in this platform anymore but better develop my software on another cloud service like Amazon. Henning Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 08:40:22 +0200 Subject: Re: [appengine-java] Billed CPU time by far too high From: ika...@google.com To: google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com If you are actually being billed, you'd fill out this form right here: http://code.google.com/appengine/kb/billing.html 1.3 CPU hours is still significantly under the free quota, so this probably wouldn't be an option for you. I'd advise running AppStats to profile where all the additional CPU usage is coming from. This information would be extremely helpful both to you as well as to other developers who may experience the same issues. Without knowing additional information, it's also possible that you were being *underbilled* previously and that we've corrected billing information. On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 10:08 AM, Henning henning2...@hotmail.de wrote: Hello, I posted about this topic already 2 weeks ago. The days after that my website got back to its normal levels of CPU time. But then things got even worse. What can I do now? How can I let the responsible developers at Google let know to fix it. The situation is as follows: I have a cron job that is triggered every minute. It has an average CPU usage of 56(17) according to the dash board. On the black list I cannot see any requests other than my cron job. It is nearly the only thing that needs CPU time. Normally what I got billed everyday was about 0.2 CPU hrs a day. In the meantime it is about 1.3 CPU hrs a day! That is more than 1/5 of the free quota just for this lightweight cron job! Henning -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-appengine-java%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en. -- Ikai Lan Developer Relations, Google App Engine Twitter: http://twitter.com/ikai Delicious: http://delicious.com/ikailan Google App Engine links: Blog: http://googleappengine.blogspot.com Twitter: http://twitter.com/app_engine Reddit: http://www.reddit.com/r/appengine -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-appengine-java%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en. Über Messenger günstiger telefonieren? Sagen Sie Ja zu JAJAH! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-appengine-java%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-appengine-java%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are
[appengine-java] Re: Viewing Emails in dev using log4j
No. It would be great if someone could shed some light on the issue. On May 12, 9:52 pm, Stevko andy.ste...@gmail.com wrote: Eurig - Did you find it? Its probably not log4j due to app engine using java.util.logging.Logger technology. I am also interested in where this log file is. I'm using Eclipse which is monitoring the log output and see nothing there. Is there another log I'm unaware of? I would assume it would be in the WEB-INF/appengine-generated directory but nothing shows there. --Stevko On Apr 5, 3:20 am, Eurig Jones eurigjo...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, From http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/java/mail/overview.html#Develop... ... When an application running in the developmentservercalls the Mail service to send an email message, the message is printed to thelog. The Java developmentserverdoes not send the email message. My question is, what log4j setup do I use to output these emails? Regards, Eurig Jones -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
[appengine-java] Re: is createFederatedLoginURL() working?
Needs more docs for this. On May 12, 4:54 am, antichrist ttlt...@gmail.com wrote: I also trying to use this. In my case, I want to log in via my apps domain id (ex: exampl...@example.com), So HashSetString attributes = new HashSet(); attributes.add(openid.mode=checkid_immediate); attributes.add(openid.ns=http://specs.openid.net/auth/2.0;); attributes.add(openid.return_to=http://example.com;); userService.createFederatedLoginURL(example.com , requestUri, example.com, attributes)); And From this, created link is :http://example.com/_ah/login_redir?claimid=example.comcontinue=http:... When I clicked that link, it redirect to my apps domain login page, but after login complete it redirect to example.com but page not found error occured. I changed above link with modification and find claimid=example.com part is correct but continue=http://example.com/is incorrect. But I can't figure out correct input. On 4월7일, 오전3시56분, Viðar Svansson vidarsv...@gmail.com wrote: Hi I just noticedcreateFederatedLoginURL() but could not find any documentation for it (except for JavaDoc). Is this intended for native support for Google Marketplace? Would really appreciate some documentation on this. I am trying this out in 1.3.2 but get an error, The API package 'user' or call 'CreateFederatedLoginURL()' was not found. Viðar On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 10:27 AM, dflorey daniel.flo...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I'm trying to replace the Step2 stuff with the new createFederatedLoginURL(), but I just get server errors in the provided /_ah/ servlets. Are these methods supposed to work and can someone please post an example how to authenticate and authorize a user? Thanks a lot, Daniel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.-원본 텍스트 숨기기 - - 원본 텍스트 보기 - -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
[appengine-java] Re: is createFederatedLoginURL() working?
Me too, some documentation would be helpful. On May 12, 4:54 am, antichrist ttlt...@gmail.com wrote: I also trying to use this. In my case, I want to log in via my apps domain id (ex: exampl...@example.com), So HashSetString attributes = new HashSet(); attributes.add(openid.mode=checkid_immediate); attributes.add(openid.ns=http://specs.openid.net/auth/2.0;); attributes.add(openid.return_to=http://example.com;); userService.createFederatedLoginURL(example.com , requestUri, example.com, attributes)); And From this, created link is :http://example.com/_ah/login_redir?claimid=example.comcontinue=http:... When I clicked that link, it redirect to my apps domain login page, but after login complete it redirect to example.com but page not found error occured. I changed above link with modification and find claimid=example.com part is correct but continue=http://example.com/is incorrect. But I can't figure out correct input. On 4월7일, 오전3시56분, Viðar Svansson vidarsv...@gmail.com wrote: Hi I just noticedcreateFederatedLoginURL() but could not find any documentation for it (except for JavaDoc). Is this intended for native support for Google Marketplace? Would really appreciate some documentation on this. I am trying this out in 1.3.2 but get an error, The API package 'user' or call 'CreateFederatedLoginURL()' was not found. Viðar On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 10:27 AM, dflorey daniel.flo...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I'm trying to replace the Step2 stuff with the new createFederatedLoginURL(), but I just get server errors in the provided /_ah/ servlets. Are these methods supposed to work and can someone please post an example how to authenticate and authorize a user? Thanks a lot, Daniel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.-원본 텍스트 숨기기 - - 원본 텍스트 보기 - -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
[appengine-java] Re: Extremely annoying error 203 - please help!!!
Thanks, yes - this error is no longer appearing now. The task executes some JPA operations, and I'm listening for timeouts and continuing the operation in another call if necessary (occasionally, it processes many entities, so can last a while). I'm still getting the below two errors however: (1) Error and exception: org.datanucleus.transaction.Transaction commit: Operation commit failed on resource: org.datanucleus.store.appengine.datastorexaresou...@16b7e0e, error code UNKNOWN and transaction: [DataNucleus Transaction, ID=Xid= com.allurefx.herdspot.server.task.GoogleTaskServlet doPost: javax.persistence.RollbackException: Transaction failed to commit (2) Exception com.google.apphosting.utils.servlet.TransactionCleanupFilter handleAbandonedTxns: Request completed without committing or rolling back transaction with id -3057717142251548962. Transaction will be rolled back. In general, what's the approved way to handle db operations that can exceed the 30 sec time limit? What I'm doing now is to queue a task from inside the servlet and let the task execute in however many iterations are necessary. On May 11, 10:04 pm, App Engine Team appengine.nore...@gmail.com wrote: Hey Sekhar This error code indicates that the request exceeded the 30 second deadline, but we were unable to throw a HardDeadlineExceedError (or your code catches this error and was doing clean up work). Without seeing your code, it's hard to know for sure. If it is datastore code, you might be seeing this as a result of a datastore issue causing increased latency with requests:http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-downtime-notify/brows... On May 10, 11:13 pm, Sekhar sek...@allurefx.com wrote: I've been struggling to get past this wretched error when using task queues: A serious problem was encountered with the process that handled this request, causing it to exit. This is likely to cause a new process to be used for the next request to your application. If you see this message frequently, you should contact the App Engine team. (Error code 203) Could someone help please? I tried custom queues and default queue; one param and two params. It used to fail intermittently, now it fails regularly. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
[appengine-java] Re: Safe Harbor DPA compliant incremental backups of datastore
I;m wairing for this, If anyone knows how to do it, please tell me. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
[appengine-java] Re: multiple applications one data store
You simply deploy another app under a different version and it will use the same datastore: http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/java/config/appconfig.html This ability was mentioned in the following blog post: http://googleappengine.blogspot.com/2009/06/10-things-you-probably-didnt-know-about.html Enjoy! On May 2, 1:08 pm, Ali ali.muhammad...@gmail.com wrote: Hi there, In a Java Application Server like Tomcat or Glassfish, I could deploy multiple war files which could share the database. I was wondering if I could deploy multiple war files, one for each context and use single data store. Is there any work around? Regards Ali -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google App Engine for Java group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.
