Re: [appengine-java] Debugging in Eclipse - App Engine dev web server doesn't respond

2011-03-22 Thread zbs
Hello!

I am experiencing a very similar problem but I have verified this only 
happens when I use eclipse.

If I run a web service from netbeans for example, I can connect to localhost 
perfectly.

What could be wrong?

Thanks!

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine for Java group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.



Re: [appengine-java] Google checkout and GAE

2011-03-22 Thread Tarun Jain
Hello Will,

I am assuming you are using the Google Checkout integration java API. Though
I don't remember the exact details but I recall having run into similar
issues with Google Checkout when I was doing some work for
Exxtensionshttps://www.exxential.com/exxtensions/home and
it turned out that it was the JAXB context creation that accounted for
almost all the delay. So it is not really an issue with checkout being slow,
but the client library just isn't optimized. Ultimately, I had to move the
creation of the context to the static block apart from several other minor
changes here and there.

Hope that helps.

Tarun

On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 10:34 PM, WillSpecht willspe...@gmail.com wrote:

 I am trying to integrate Google checkout with my GAE app.  I am
 hitting 2 big bottle necks.  exampleNotificationServelet is using a
 ton of CPU and usually fails with a time out if starting a new
 instance.  I'm reading a few values from the merchant data and then
 doing one write to the data store.  I don't see what can be taking
 that much time.

 It is also taking forever to create a cart and redirect to the Google
 checkout page.  It takes almost 15 seconds once pressing the checkout
 button.  I have narrowed this down to the build and postCart methods.
 When I step through while debugging on my local host, these methods
 take about 10-12 seconds to complete.  Is this normal?

 I am having trouble debugging exampleNotificationServelet, since I
 don't know what checkout is sending to my server.  Can anyone explain
 a good way to fake a notification to the localhost running
 exampleNotificationServelet? So I can set break points and see what is
 taking up so much CPU.

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Google App Engine for Java group.
 To post to this group, send email to
 google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine for Java group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.



[appengine-java] Re: ImagesServiceFactory.makeImageFromBlob(blobKey) image.getImageData() gets NULL error

2011-03-22 Thread branflake2267
I'm going to try to get the job done with HTML5 for now, until the server 
has the features to do the job.

http://google-web-toolkit.googlecode.com/svn/javadoc/latest/index.html?overview-summary.html

http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/the-canvas-element.html#images

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine for Java group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.



[appengine-java] raise limits for applications

2011-03-22 Thread Perun Katana
Hi all,
 
I was thinking if there could be a way to raise the limits for applications. 
My contecern is, that I have a JNLP application with a nice bunch of 
libraries included (e.g. jasper reports, etc), which takes the application 
nicely over 10 MB. The application is built as a Netbeans RPC application, 
so there is a jnlp-servlet for downloading all necessary files. 
Unfortunatelly, such applications are rarely under 10 MB.
 
The jnlp-servlet itself does not consume much memory (as far I know), so 
this is not a problem, To download all libraries may take a little 
processing time, traffic and request time (well, even for slow trafic I hope 
each library is downloaded in 30s), but that's why there is billing quota 
for I am willing to pay. I'd see the google apps as a nice platform to 
deploy web start applications too, but for bigger application there would be 
nice to raise request handler quotas too, even if it would be a payed 
service. I don't think a need a separate VPS instance running 24x7 just to 
download a jnlp application.
 
The question is, if there is another solution or I'll have to work on 
getting the static libraries deployed somewhere else (not a bad ide too).
 
Regards
 Perun

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine for Java group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.



[appengine-java] Re: Google checkout and GAE

2011-03-22 Thread WillSpecht
Can someone explain why the SDK doesn't work on app engine.  Does it
use a library that's not on the white list? Is it just broken in
general and doesn't work well anywhere?

On Mar 22, 7:02 am, Tarun Jain tj...@exxential.com wrote:
 Hello Will,

 I am assuming you are using the Google Checkout integration java API. Though
 I don't remember the exact details but I recall having run into similar
 issues with Google Checkout when I was doing some work for
 Exxtensionshttps://www.exxential.com/exxtensions/home and
 it turned out that it was the JAXB context creation that accounted for
 almost all the delay. So it is not really an issue with checkout being slow,
 but the client library just isn't optimized. Ultimately, I had to move the
 creation of the context to the static block apart from several other minor
 changes here and there.

 Hope that helps.

 Tarun

 On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 10:34 PM, WillSpecht willspe...@gmail.com wrote:
  I am trying to integrate Google checkout with my GAE app.  I am
  hitting 2 big bottle necks.  exampleNotificationServelet is using a
  ton of CPU and usually fails with a time out if starting a new
  instance.  I'm reading a few values from the merchant data and then
  doing one write to the data store.  I don't see what can be taking
  that much time.

  It is also taking forever to create a cart and redirect to the Google
  checkout page.  It takes almost 15 seconds once pressing the checkout
  button.  I have narrowed this down to the build and postCart methods.
  When I step through while debugging on my local host, these methods
  take about 10-12 seconds to complete.  Is this normal?

  I am having trouble debugging exampleNotificationServelet, since I
  don't know what checkout is sending to my server.  Can anyone explain
  a good way to fake a notification to the localhost running
  exampleNotificationServelet? So I can set break points and see what is
  taking up so much CPU.

  --
  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
  Google App Engine for Java group.
  To post to this group, send email to
  google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
  google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
  For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine for Java group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.



[appengine-java] Google Apps Marketplace sample application exceptio

2011-03-22 Thread Balázs Jilling
Hi!

I followed the steps in this tutorial, and my app is hosted on app engine.
http://code.google.com/intl/hu-HU/googleapps/marketplace/tutorial_java.html

I had the following experiences:
- On my private listing in the Apps Marketplace I click on Add it now, I 
give my apps domain and as I click on the Go button nothing happens.
- I go to the app engine and open the application from there. It starts, 
asks for my domain, I grant access for the app to my domain, and after that 
the folowing message appears:
Error: Server ErrorThe server encountered an error and could not complete 
your request.
I checked the log and it says:

   1. 
   
   /hello
   com.google.gdata.util.AuthenticationException: OK
   HTML
   HEAD
   TITLEToken invalid - Invalid AuthSub token./TITLE
   /HEAD
   BODY BGCOLOR=#FF TEXT=#00
   H1Token invalid - Invalid AuthSub token./H1
   H2Error 401/H2
   /BODY
   /HTML
   
at 
com.google.gdata.client.http.HttpGDataRequest.handleErrorResponse(HttpGDataRequest.java:564)
at 
com.google.gdata.client.http.GoogleGDataRequest.handleErrorResponse(GoogleGDataRequest.java:543)
at 
com.google.gdata.client.http.HttpGDataRequest.checkResponse(HttpGDataRequest.java:536)
at 
com.google.gdata.client.http.HttpGDataRequest.execute(HttpGDataRequest.java:515)
at 
com.google.gdata.client.http.GoogleGDataRequest.execute(GoogleGDataRequest.java:515)
at com.google.gdata.client.Service.getFeed(Service.java:1053)
at com.google.gdata.client.Service.getFeed(Service.java:995)
at com.google.gdata.client.GoogleService.getFeed(GoogleService.java:662)
at com.google.gdata.client.Service.query(Service.java:1155)
at com.google.gdata.client.Service.query(Service.java:1096)
at 
com.google.code.samples.apps.marketplace.CalendarServlet.nextEvent(CalendarServlet.java:119)
at 
com.google.code.samples.apps.marketplace.CalendarServlet.doGet(CalendarServlet.java:89)
at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:617)
at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:717)
at 
org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHolder.handle(ServletHolder.java:511)
at 
org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler$CachedChain.doFilter(ServletHandler.java:1166)
at 
com.google.apphosting.utils.servlet.ParseBlobUploadFilter.doFilter(ParseBlobUploadFilter.java:97)
at 
org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler$CachedChain.doFilter(ServletHandler.java:1157)
at 
com.google.apphosting.runtime.jetty.SaveSessionFilter.doFilter(SaveSessionFilter.java:35)
at 
org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler$CachedChain.doFilter(ServletHandler.java:1157)
at 
com.google.apphosting.utils.servlet.TransactionCleanupFilter.doFilter(TransactionCleanupFilter.java:43)
at 
org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler$CachedChain.doFilter(ServletHandler.java:1157)
at 
org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler.handle(ServletHandler.java:388)
at 
org.mortbay.jetty.security.SecurityHandler.handle(SecurityHandler.java:216)
at 
org.mortbay.jetty.servlet.SessionHandler.handle(SessionHandler.java:182)
at 
org.mortbay.jetty.handler.ContextHandler.handle(ContextHandler.java:765)
at org.mortbay.jetty.webapp.WebAppContext.handle(WebAppContext.java:418)
at 
com.google.apphosting.runtime.jetty.AppVersionHandlerMap.handle(AppVersionHandlerMap.java:238)
at 
org.mortbay.jetty.handler.HandlerWrapper.handle(HandlerWrapper.java:152)
at org.mortbay.jetty.Server.handle(Server.java:326)
at 
org.mortbay.jetty.HttpConnection.handleRequest(HttpConnection.java:542)
at 
org.mortbay.jetty.HttpConnection$RequestHandler.headerComplete(HttpConnection.java:923)
at 
com.google.apphosting.runtime.jetty.RpcRequestParser.parseAvailable(RpcRequestParser.java:76)
at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpConnection.handle(HttpConnection.java:404)
at 
com.google.apphosting.runtime.jetty.JettyServletEngineAdapter.serviceRequest(JettyServletEngineAdapter.java:135)
at 
com.google.apphosting.runtime.JavaRuntime.handleRequest(JavaRuntime.java:261)
at 
com.google.apphosting.base.RuntimePb$EvaluationRuntime$2.handleRequest(RuntimePb.java:8440)
at com.google.net.rpc.impl.RpcUtil.runRpcInApplication(RpcUtil.java:454)
at com.google.net.rpc.impl.Server$RpcTask.runInContext(Server.java:572)
at 
com.google.tracing.TraceContext$TraceContextRunnable$1.run(TraceContext.java:448)
at com.google.tracing.TraceContext.runInContext(TraceContext.java:688)
at 
com.google.tracing.TraceContext$AbstractTraceContextCallback.runInInheritedContextNoUnref(TraceContext.java:326)
at 
com.google.tracing.TraceContext$AbstractTraceContextCallback.runInInheritedContext(TraceContext.java:318)
at 
com.google.tracing.TraceContext$TraceContextRunnable.run(TraceContext.java:446)
at 

Re: [appengine-java] Task Enqueue in a Transaction

2011-03-22 Thread Tom Gibara
It's my understanding that, with HR, getting an entity by key is only
strongly consistent within a transaction.

If this is wrong, then a significant portion of my own task handling
code may need revisiting...

Perhaps someone who knows more could clarify this.

Tom.

On 21 March 2011 22:10, Simon Knott knott.si...@gmail.com wrote:
 I've got a query about tasks and transactions on a High-replication app that
 I'm hoping someone can help me with.
 I've got the following scenario:
 1) Begin a transaction
 2) Persist an entity
 3) Enqueue a task within the transaction
 4) Commit the transaction
 Within the task, I get the entity via its key and I'm finding that the
 object has yet to be updated in the datastore - it was my belief that
 getting an entity via its key is strongly consistent, so I was quite
 surprised to see that the entity was stale.  Is this result expected?  I've
 got some defensive code in place now which just re-enqueues the task, but I
 wasn't sure whether that was the right approach.
 I originally had the same issue on the MS version of my app, before I
 realised that I needed to enqueue the task within the same transaction to
 ensure the persist had occurred before the task was run.

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Google App Engine for Java group.
 To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine for Java group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.



Re: [appengine-java] Task Enqueue in a Transaction

2011-03-22 Thread Simon Knott
I thought that it was strongly consistent because in the background the 
get-by-key was forced into a transaction and that you didn't have to declare 
it yourself.  If it didn't happen so sporadically, I'd test to see whether 
this fixed the issue!

As you say, if someone could clarify that would be great.  If consistency 
isn't the issue, then it looks to me that the task is being kicked off 
before the transaction is committed.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine for Java group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.



Re: [appengine-java] Task Enqueue in a Transaction

2011-03-22 Thread Jay Young
According to the docs, gets, puts, deletes, and ancestor queries are all 
strongly consistent:
http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/java/datastore/hr/

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine for Java group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.



[appengine-java] Set password for appcfg.sh update

2011-03-22 Thread Benjamin Muschko
Hi,

Is there way to use a pre-defined password (e.g. set as a parameter or
from some file) for the update task (http://code.google.com/appengine/
docs/java/tools/uploadinganapp.html)? Unfortunately, I couldn't find
an appropriate parameter. I'd like to upload my app to App Engine as
part of an automated Continuous Integration process without having to
enter the password on the command-line.

Thanks,

Ben

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine for Java group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.



Re: [appengine-java] Task Enqueue in a Transaction

2011-03-22 Thread Tom Gibara
Thanks for the link, somehow I'd managed to miss that page of
documentation entirely*; it's good to know, though it indicates other
problems for the OP.

I'm not clear on why eventually consistent gets aren't an option, ie.
why all gets are indicated as being strongly consistent. Is this a
direct consequence of replication algorithm used? There are various
places in the code I'm currently developing where dirty gets are
adequate and I'd be happy to see them faster.

* As an aside, I do find the documentation on the datastore feels very
scattered. I'd much prefer sections on the underlying app engine
mechanics with less language specific guidance.

Tom.

On 22 March 2011 17:59, Jay Young jayyoung9...@gmail.com wrote:
 According to the docs, gets, puts, deletes, and ancestor queries are all
 strongly consistent:
 http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/java/datastore/hr/


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine for Java group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.



[appengine-java] Re: Task Enqueue in a Transaction

2011-03-22 Thread Didier Durand
Hi,

For me, the answer is here:
http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/java/datastore/transactions.html#Isolation_and_Consistency

They say: Queries and gets inside a transaction are guaranteed to see
a single, consistent snapshot of the datastore as of the beginning of
the transaction. In particular, entities and index rows in the
transaction's entity group are fully updated so that queries return
the complete, correct set of result entities, without the false
positives or false negatives described in Transaction Isolation that
can occur in queries outside of transactions.

The task is part of the initial transaction so it sees the ds as of
the beginning of the transaction

regards

didier

On Mar 22, 9:12 pm, Tom Gibara tomgib...@gmail.com wrote:
 Thanks for the link, somehow I'd managed to miss that page of
 documentation entirely*; it's good to know, though it indicates other
 problems for the OP.

 I'm not clear on why eventually consistent gets aren't an option, ie.
 why all gets are indicated as being strongly consistent. Is this a
 direct consequence of replication algorithm used? There are various
 places in the code I'm currently developing where dirty gets are
 adequate and I'd be happy to see them faster.

 * As an aside, I do find the documentation on the datastore feels very
 scattered. I'd much prefer sections on the underlying app engine
 mechanics with less language specific guidance.

 Tom.

 On 22 March 2011 17:59, Jay Young jayyoung9...@gmail.com wrote:

  According to the docs, gets, puts, deletes, and ancestor queries are all
  strongly consistent:
 http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/java/datastore/hr/



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google App Engine for Java group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine-java+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en.