Re: Unable to download eclipse plugin

[Asier AB.]

Hi

Use this plugin - that one is deprecated.

https://github.com/gwt-plugins/gwt-eclipse-plugin/projects/2

Regards

El dom., 20 may. 2018 22:58, J.J.Chao Tao  escribió:

> Hi,
>
>   I am trying to install GWT plugin for Eclipse (Oxygen or Neon), using
> the Eclipse market place, but got "No repository found at
> http://storage.googleapis.com/gwt-eclipse-plugin/v3/release;. Can anyone
> help?
>
>   Thanks.
>
> --J.J Chao--
>
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "GWT Users" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT 
Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Rendering/painting in IE8/IE9 is slow when compared to FireFox(21.0) and Chrome(Version 27.0.1453.110 m) using GWT.

[ajaybela . ab]

Rendering/painting in IE8/IE9 is slow when compared to FireFox(21.0) and 
Chrome(Version 27.0.1453.110 m) using GWT.

During GWT Table rendering, for each Table cell, we use the below API:

1. com.google.gwt.user.client.ui.Grid.getCellFormatter().setStyleName
2. com.google.gwt.user.client.ui.Grid.setWidget(row, column, new 
CATableEditableCell(this, row, column, data)) or setWidget(row, column, 
(Widget)o)
3. com.google.gwt.user.client.ui.Grid.setHTML(row, column, datalink);

Here are the Observations while using IE vs Fireforx:
1. It takes an average of 50-60 millis to format a cell in table where as 
in FF it is taking 0-5 millis
2. With this overall table painting is taking time when huge data is 
there/painted in the table

Is it a known phenomena or can IE be optimized further. If yes, can you pls 
suggest any?

Thanks!!
Ajay B

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google Web Toolkit group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Seem like no way to get keycode from KeyDownHandler, KeyUpHandler

[AB]

The newish event handler system seems designed to prevent getting a
keycode from the KeyDown and KeyUp events?  Does anyone know the
reasoning behind this?
This creates a problem. For example, in IE, if one wants to detect
autorepeats of a non char key like an uparrow, you only get it on a
KeyDown event (see http://unixpapa.com/js/key.html ). Since the
KeyPress does not get repeats (in IE for arrow keys), I need an
KeyDown event handler that knows they key that was hit (maybe i could
write enough logic to first sense the keypress, then remember that
keycode,...)

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

gwt canvas reload causes lost focus

[AB]

I am doing a reload of the GwtCanvas and am losing current mouse focus
on unrelated input.
I am wondering if I could ask some (perhaps global) object for the
current focus and then just restore it. But I didnt see anything like
Window.getCurrentObjectInFocus() or whatever. Is there some way to do
this? I'd hate to keep track of the focus manually to restore it.

thx for any ideas.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

Re: Number of DAO's effect over all module sizes

[AB]

I dont understand why or even how you could include DAOs in the client
side src trees.  When I think of dao's, I think classes that have tcp
connections to databases, etc which cant possibly compile into
javascript.  Are you talking about dto's or other objects that the
DAOs pass back to the client via rpc?  Or are you talking about just
the interfaces that the rpc classes implement on each side?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: Need opinion on design idea

[AB]

Thanks.  Im thinking I can inspect the cookie in the image.onload
event but Ill need to play with it and test across all browsers.  Ill
post something if it seems workable.

On Jan 8, 12:20 pm, todd.sei...@gmail.com todd.sei...@gmail.com
wrote:
 This sounds like a unique and workable answer. If your cookie size
 does not exceed 4k you should be fine. The only thing I don't know is
 how the browsers will handle a statically named cookie with
 asynchronous request. Even though Javascript (GWT) is single threaded
 the browser is not. Try to queue your requests that use this method.

 On Jan 7, 7:56 pm, AB abere...@drillinginfo.com wrote:

  I am thinking about a charting app that will use jfreechart on the
  server side (I need PDFs and other server side output anyway) and GWT
  + Canvas on the client so that users can do fancy  things like curve
  fit in the browser.
  That means that when the client asks the server to render a chart, the
  client needs to get back a png and also some data (like scaling info,
  etc).  I can of course do 2 rounds trips but I am thinking of
  combining it into one rt.

  The idea is that the server response is an image/png but also sets a
  nonpersistent cookie in the header that encodes the data I need.  The
  gwt app disassembles the cookie value (perhaps it is even json).  If
  the cookie would be too big (unlikely), the cookie value becomes a
  message to the client that it needs a dedicated rt.

  Does anyone see a problem with this?  Any thoughts are appreciated.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Need opinion on design idea

[AB]

I am thinking about a charting app that will use jfreechart on the
server side (I need PDFs and other server side output anyway) and GWT
+ Canvas on the client so that users can do fancy  things like curve
fit in the browser.
That means that when the client asks the server to render a chart, the
client needs to get back a png and also some data (like scaling info,
etc).  I can of course do 2 rounds trips but I am thinking of
combining it into one rt.

The idea is that the server response is an image/png but also sets a
nonpersistent cookie in the header that encodes the data I need.  The
gwt app disassembles the cookie value (perhaps it is even json).  If
the cookie would be too big (unlikely), the cookie value becomes a
message to the client that it needs a dedicated rt.

Does anyone see a problem with this?  Any thoughts are appreciated.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: Your opinion sought: Jetty or Tomcat?

[AB]

I am using -noserver so it doesnt matter and even if I wasnt, i could
live with either.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: can the gwt compiler compile files outside the module

[AB]

Thanks all. I guess Ill create an ant task that cobbles together
various util classes that we want and build a module.   I dont know if
I need to fabricate an entrypoint for this module but i guess I can if
the compiler demands it.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

can the gwt compiler compile files outside the module

[AB]

I have a module and tried to include a .java file that is on the gwt
compile cp but not in the module (ie, not under
com.mycompany.mymodule.client). I reference the class in my module.
The compiler cannot find the .java file. Is the only way to include it
by building another module and including that module?  I am trying to
create a bunch of shared utilities classes.  Any help is
appreciated.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---