GWT plugin does not load in Chrome Canary build.
I'm using Chrome Canary build (Version 23.0.1251.1 canary). When I try to load a dev mode plugin chrome fails to load it. I keep getting message "Could not load GWT dev mode plugin" and in the console I get following errors [2:-1391222080:127017415849516:ERROR:webplugin_delegate_proxy.cc(407)] PluginMsg_Init returned false [2:-1391222080:127017509838691:ERROR:webplugin_impl.cc(269)] Couldn't initialize plug-in Btw I used "--enable-easy-off-store-extension-install" flag to be able to install the plugin /Applications/Google\ Chrome\ Canary.app/Contents/MaS/Google\ Chrome\ Canary --enable-easy-off-store-extension-install --user-data-dir=~/.test Has anyone been able to get GWT dev mode working in latest canary build? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/hq1UzIYHhfkJ. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Request Factory unable to resolve domain objects
I am just trying to get RF running and have run into an issue when doing GWT compile. Basically the problem is that GWT compiler complains that domain classes cannot be resolved. This prevents me from compiling with -strict option. I have made sure that both sources and compiled classes are on classpath. I have also made sure that request-factory is run. Does anyone have any ideas how to get rid of this errors? And why do I get them in the first place? Validating units: Errors in 'file:/D:/devel/project/sag-cliserv/src/com/example/sag/shared/application/storage/proxy/StoredItemProxy.java' Line 3: The import com.example.sag.server.application.StoredItem cannot be resolved Line 4: The import com.example.sag.server.application.StoredItemLocator cannot be resolved Line 11: StoredItem cannot be resolved to a type Line 11: StoredItemLocator cannot be resolved to a type Line 11: Class cannot be resolved to a type Errors in 'file:/D:/devel/project/sag-cliserv/src/com/example/sag/shared/application/storage/rf/StoredItemContext.java' Line 4: The import com.example.sag.server.application.StoredItemLocator cannot be resolved Line 14: StoredItemLocator cannot be resolved to a type Removing invalidated units Compilation unit 'file:/D:/devel/project/sag-cliserv/src/com/example/sag/shared/application/storage/rf/SagRequestFactory.java' is removed due to invalid reference(s): com.example.sag.shared.application.storage.rf.StoredItemContext Compilation unit 'file:/D:/devel/project/sag-cliserv/src/com/example/sag/client/application/storage/StorageService.java' is removed due to invalid reference(s): com.example.sag.shared.application.storage.rf.SagRequestFactory Compilation unit 'file:/D:/devel/project/sag-cliserv/src/com/example/sag/shared/application/storage/rf/SagRequestContextProvider.java' is removed due to invalid reference(s): com.example.sag.shared.application.storage.rf.SagRequestFactory Below is the ant script snippet used to do javac And this is the GWT compile part M. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/FFPph3RLWdMJ. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Getting modified GWT compiler artifact
Is there a way to easily modify an artifact within a linker? To be more specific, I'd like to modify JS in CompilationResult arifacts. I can easily get to JS of a CompilationResult artifact but I cannot see a way to easily modify it. I guess artifacts cannot be modified, but is there maybe a method that would allow one to make a copy of artifact which then could be modified? A linker could then put a modified copy into artifactSet. Or is there some other solution to this problem? Marko -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/hdC6tjowCFwJ. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: How to see generated JS code before its sent to linking step.
That's one of options I had in mind. I was hoping there is a way to read the actual content of permutation-x.js files :) On Jul 10, 2011, at 11:07 AM, Thomas Broyer wrote: How about using a Linker with @LinkOrder(Order.PRE) and output the artifacts' content from there? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/tmP5xdoC2NsJ. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
How to see generated JS code before its sent to linking step.
Hi, I wanted to see what was getting generated by CompilePerms step and sent to linker. For that purpose I executed Precompile and CompilePerms steps manually. I got hold of permutation-x.js files. When I opened any of those files in text editor the output was not readable. The problem was not code obfuscation but weird characters in the file. How can I get those js files output in some format with ASCII characters? Or is there some other way I can get to JS files that are actually input to Linker? Marko -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/RnsNTKasTpkJ. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
gwt maven plugin - Google's or Codehause's?
Which gwt-maven-plugin version do you suggest to use? I have seen that Expenses sample in 2.1.0 uses 1.3.2.google while that same sample uses 2.2.0 in trunk... What is the reason for 1.3.2.google not to be used in trunk as well? Marko -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/NVoQAwGH0bsJ. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: Help : Memory Leak Problem
Do you have this problem in development or production mode? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/XPZ5kXXSu8IJ. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: GPE makes GWT projects build extremely long
It seems like I have found a solution that brings down compile time to something reasonable (~3 mins). From 1.5h (not 1.30 as I initially wrote :)) to 3 mins!!! I have downloaded xhtml.ent and added the file to User Specified Entries in Eclipse's XML Catalog. Could somebody explain why this can effect compile time this much? I think this is the same bug as described here - http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=5773 Marko -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/VNKkCt7qwrMJ. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
GPE makes GWT projects build extremely long
When building GWT project it takes like approximately 1.30h to build. If I turn off GWT and Google AppEngine nature for the project it takes only a few seconds to build. I'm using Eclipse Indigo + m2e 1.0 + GPE 2.3.2. I have also tried using Eclipse Helios + m2e 1.0 + GPE 2.3.2 A screenshot of memory heap usage can be found here: https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/9TO8cY-XEpLvtAWAUu1J6OLZadJo0K1gwox6XuxJ2b0?feat=directlink I tried deleting workspace, creating new one, deleting projects and importing again, reinstalling eclipse but I always end up with extremely long build cycle Has anyone else had similar issues? Marko -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/5lBFdiS4920J. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: Profiling using speed tracer does not "pick up" jvm args
Hey, you're right. This was the problem. Thanks. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/nKd_t8l02VkJ. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Profiling using speed tracer does not "pick up" jvm args
When I create a new profiler configuration for speed tracer and pass Xms or Xms (for example -Xmx1024m -Xms256m) and run a profile a GWT application it is always run with -Xmx512m param only. I use latest stable version of GPE and eclipse 3.6. Has anyone had similar issues? Here you can see my profile configuration https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/muFEzUPVR8CpmnaFwt_A1-LZadJo0K1gwox6XuxJ2b0?feat=directlink Here you can find a screenshot from jvisualvm. https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/BPRcOODfC_s9o2iPksHdMuLZadJo0K1gwox6XuxJ2b0?feat=directlink I'm starting to thing that this might be a bug -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/0wjagQ21KOAJ. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: MVP, GIN, UiBinder
Hi, I have been working on implementing Event Bus and MVP pattern in a GWT 1.7 project. Recently I have also implemented the same patterns using GWT 2.0. You can checkout the following project: http://code.google.com/p/gwt-event-bus-research/ (gwt 2.0 example is found in _current_ folder). Hope this helps... On Dec 15 2009, 6:01 pm, Tristan wrote: > Would you be able to provide a sample non-trivial example? ie > injecting a child view into a parent view? I have been trying to do > this and I get a runtime error of ClassNotFoundException when the > provider tries to do "new ParentView(childView)". > > On Dec 9, 9:30 am, "P.G.Taboada" wrote: > > > > > Well, that is what I am sort of doing. And it turns out to be a kind > > of service location. > > > There are some workarounds, and they are nothing more than just that: > > a workaround. > > > I am letting GIN build all of my presenters, and then I let them bind > > the UIs. > > Not nice, but that is the way with the fewest dependency lookup calls > > for me atm. > > > On 9 Dez., 16:13, Thomas Broyer wrote: > > > > On Dec 9, 12:50 pm, "P.G.Taboada" wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > as many other GWT developers I really like the above mentioned > > > > approaches. > > > > > I am having a little bit of pain when it comes down to embedding views > > > > into views. UiBinder and GIN don't play well together, I am struggling > > > > with ugly locator pattern usages to create my sub/ embedded views. My > > > > code is now full of //WORKAROUND task tags, hoping to get it solved > > > > somehow someday. > > > > > But that is the point: at which direction should I look? MVP tells me > > > > to have views injected into my presenter, really nice. UiBinder on the > > > > other hand needs the views, would create them properly, but then they > > > > would not be available to GIN (compile-time vs. runtime). > > > > > If my feeling is right, we would need some way to hook up into the > > > > UIBinder, providing a GIN based MVP resolver, quite similar to the > > > > variable resolvers people use in JSF to get hands on Spring beans from > > > > JSF. But as far I can see, UiBinder does not provide such extension > > > > point. > > > > > Any thoughts here? > > > > How about injecting your "child views" (or Provider<>s) into your view > > > and then use @UiField(provided=true) to tell UiBinder you're providing > > > those widgets? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
gwt 2.0 rc2 - which junit? 3 or 4?
I was just looking at the improvements related to GwtTestCase in Gwt2.0 and I was wondering which JUnit framework should I use now? Is it ok to use JUnit4? or should I still use JUnit3? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: Announcing GWT 2.0 Milestone 1
I had the same problem - I solved it by manually deleting the temp internet files and all the cache in browser. On Oct 8, 3:50 pm, Christian Goudreau wrote: > I got some problem too with Eclipse and Snow Leopard. It's always asking me > to re-compile my application and I've done that a lot of times ! I was > trying to get it work with an active project. > > Christian > > > > On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 2:22 AM, Parvez Shah wrote: > > Hi, I tried searching,but could not find any document regarding what all > > changes has been made in the API, > > > do we get any new widget in 2.0 > > any new annotation > > > On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 7:38 AM, Dominik Steiner < > > dominik.j.stei...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > >> Hi Jospeh, > > >> did you consider to install the Google Plugin for eclipse? > > >> You will even then run into problems, but reading through this post > > >>http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit/browse_thread/threa... > > >> you should be up and running pretty soon. > > >> HTH > > >> Dominik > > >> On 7 Okt., 20:00, Joseph Arceneaux wrote: > >> > There does not appear to be a nice URL I can point Eclipse 3.5 at in > >> order > >> > to install GWT 2.0 in the usual fashion. Nor, apparently, any > >> instructions > >> > about an alternate procedure. > >> > It appears unclear on just where / how to merge the contents of the zip > >> file > >> > into an existing Eclipse integration; does anyone have a pointer to > >> > documentation for this? > > >> > Thanks, > >> > Joe > > >> > On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 4:43 PM, Amit Manjhi > >> wrote: > > >> > > Hi everyone, > > >> > > We are excited to release the first milestone build for GWT 2.0 today. > >> > > This milestone provides early access (read: known to still be > >> > > unfinished and buggy) to the various bits of core functionality that > >> > > will be coming in GWT 2.0. Please download the bits from: > > >> > >http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/downloads/list?can=1&q=2.. > >> .. > > >> > > Things that are changing with GWT 2.0 that might otherwise be > >> > > confusing without explanation > >> > > * Terminology changes: We're going to start using the term > >> > > "development mode" rather than the old term "hosted mode." The term > >> > > "hosted mode" was sometimes confusing to people, so we'll be using the > >> > > more descriptive term from now on. For similar reasons, we'll be using > >> > > the term "production mode" rather than "web mode" when referring to > >> > > compiled script. > > >> > > * Changes to the distribution: Note that there's only one download, > >> > > and it's no longer platform-specific. You download the same zip file > >> > > for every development platform. This is made possible by the new > >> > > plugin approach used to implement development mode (see below). The > >> > > distribution file does not include the browser plugins themselves; > >> > > those are downloaded separately the first time you use development > >> > > mode in a browser that doesn't have the plugin installed. > > >> > > Functionality that will be coming in GWT 2.0 > >> > > * In-Browser Development Mode: Prior to 2.0, GWT hosted mode provided > >> > > a special-purpose "hosted browser" to debug your GWT code. In 2.0, the > >> > > web page being debugged is viewed within a regular-old browser. > >> > > Development mode is supported through the use of a native-code plugin > >> > > for each browser. In other words, you can use development mode > >> > > directly from Safari, Firefox, IE, and Chrome. > > >> > > * Code Splitting: Developer-guided code splitting allows you to chunk > >> > > your GWT code into multiple fragments for faster startup. Imagine > >> > > having to download a whole movie before being able to watch it. Well, > >> > > that's what you have to do with most Ajax apps these days -- download > >> > > the whole thing before using it. With code splitting, you can arrange > >> > > to load just the minimum script needed to get the application running > >> > > and the user interacting, while the rest of the app is downloaded as > >> > > needed. > > >> > > * Declarative User Interface: GWT's UiBinder now allows you to create > >> > > user interfaces mostly declaratively. Previously, widgets had to be > >> > > created and assembled programmatically, requiring lots of code. Now, > >> > > you can use XML to declare your UI, making the code more readable, > >> > > easier to maintain, and faster to develop. The Mail sample has been > >> > > updated to use the new declarative UI. > > >> > > * Bundling of resources (ClientBundle): GWT has shipped with > >> > > ImageBundles since GWT v1.4, giving developers automatic spriting of > >> > > images. ClientBundle generalizes this technique, bringing the power of > >> > > combining and optimizing resources into one download to things like > >> > > text files, CSS, and XML. This means fewer network round trips, which > >> > > in turn can decrease application latency -- especially on mobile > >> >
tabpanel widget and hovering
I have tried to apply a hover style to tab panel items. I have applied
it in the project's css file as follows:
.gwt-TabBar .gwt-TabBarItem:hover {
background:#2647a0 url(../images/sprite.png) repeat-x left
-1300px;
border:solid #a3a3a3;
border-width:0 1px;
color:#000;
}
But doing so hasn't resulted in any hovering effect. I also tried
googling but with no results... Am I doing something wrong or it is
not possible to have hover effect on tab bar items.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: javascript in war folder not included after building war file
Well I really doubt that is the problem - The problem is only with the extjs libraray (which is located in the ext folder) - all other librarys and folders get copied. At the moment, I have bypassed the problem by creating an ant script and specifying a target which copies the ext folder to the appropriate folder in the war\\ fodler. On the other hand, I still have the problem with the deployed project and its looking in the wrong place for resources Any help would really be appreciated... Following is the code I use in my gwt.xml file... if i specify module name in the script path it seems to work but If i ommit that information the deployed application looks in the wrong place I guess this might be a bug because ommiting the information does not cause any problem is the hosted mode.. nor there are problems if I use "browse/compile" button in the window that is shown by the gwt hosted mode... On Jul 15, 6:16 pm, Dalla wrote: > As I recall it, putting thing directly in the war folder is not a good > idea, > since those will be removed when you compile your GWT-project. > > Instead, create a directory named "public" in your root package, > any files put in the public directory or sub directories there of, > will be copied to your war folder on compile. > > You can read more about the public directory here: > > http://code.google.com/intl/sv-SE/webtoolkit/doc/1.6/DevGuideOrganizi... > > --Dallahttp://date-time.appspot.com/ > > On 15 Juli, 09:06, Marko Vuksanovic wrote: > > > > > Aren't these relative paths? > > > On Jul 4, 7:01 pm, waf wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > Try to use relative paths to your resources. > > > > -- > > > waf > > > > On 4 Lip, 17:35, Marko Vuksanovic wrote: > > > > > I have copied ext-js library into war folder of my gwt project. Then I > > > > have included it in my project.gwt.xml file as follows: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > after building the project, using the ant script that was created by > > > > the gwt sdk command line tool, the ext folder is not included in the > > > > \js\ folder (nor in the ). > > > > > There is also one more problem that I encountered - When I deploy the > > > > war file onto a server- when I typehttp://localhost:8080/project > > > > (which is the name of the war file as well as the gwt project itself) > > > > the application looks for the javascript files > > > > athttp://localhost:8080/js/ext.. > > > > and it should be looking for them > > > > athttp://localhost:8080/project/js/ext. > > > > > Any help on this issue would be greatly appreciated.- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: javascript in war folder not included after building war file
Aren't these relative paths? On Jul 4, 7:01 pm, waf wrote: > Hi, > > Try to use relative paths to your resources. > > -- > waf > > On 4 Lip, 17:35, Marko Vuksanovic wrote: > > > > > I have copied ext-js library into war folder of my gwt project. Then I > > have included it in my project.gwt.xml file as follows: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > after building the project, using the ant script that was created by > > the gwt sdk command line tool, the ext folder is not included in the > > \js\ folder (nor in the ). > > > There is also one more problem that I encountered - When I deploy the > > war file onto a server- when I typehttp://localhost:8080/project > > (which is the name of the war file as well as the gwt project itself) > > the application looks for the javascript files > > athttp://localhost:8080/js/ext.. > > and it should be looking for them athttp://localhost:8080/project/js/ext. > > > Any help on this issue would be greatly appreciated.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
javascript in war folder not included after building war file
I have copied ext-js library into war folder of my gwt project. Then I have included it in my project.gwt.xml file as follows: after building the project, using the ant script that was created by the gwt sdk command line tool, the ext folder is not included in the \js\ folder (nor in the ). There is also one more problem that I encountered - When I deploy the war file onto a server- when I type http://localhost:8080/project (which is the name of the war file as well as the gwt project itself) the application looks for the javascript files at http://localhost:8080/js/ext.. and it should be looking for them at http://localhost:8080/project/js/ext. Any help on this issue would be greatly appreciated. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
GWT JUnit testing problem - "Unable to find 'js.gwt.xml' on your classpath"
I am trying to test my gwt application )version 1.6.4) but have run into a problem. I have created a simple test and when I run it i get lots of errors - Unable to find 'js.gwt.xml' on your classpath - but the test seems to be executed successfuly. Any ideas what could be the problem and how to solve that? I have also noticed that this test creates a "tomcat" folder in my project directory structure. Could somebody explain why this is happening... Thanks in advance... --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
