Re: [gwt-contrib] "GWT RPC" and its role in the future of GWT
f a .gwt.rpc file on the server to enumerate types that are
> serializable and a JSNI map on the client, a single class is generated to
> describe this for each platform - server gets one, and client gets another
> for example, and these are almost certainly compliments of each other.
> Avoiding the JSNI map may pose a small risk at increasing generated code
> size, but I've tried to mitigate this by generating specific serializer
> types which describe exactly which operations are supported, so that any
> pruning step when compiling code can delete as much code as possible (and
> support weird cases like only reading a type sent from the server, but both
> reading and writing that same type when communicate with a web worker).
>
> The SerializableTypeOracleBuilder remains at the heart of the code
> generation mechanism, updated to use TypeMirrors and Elements instead of
> GWT's JType hierarchy. Instead of being invoked by the RemoteService code
> generator, this is instead triggered by its own annotation, expected to be
> found on an interface with helper methods to add various types to an
> existing stream, or decode a stream and read expected data. This interface
> in turn is expected to be generated by another, higher-level annotation
> processor, based on the specific use case (XMLHttpRequest, WebSocket, etc).
> The built-in "high level" processor implementation takes an interface full
> of asynchronous interface methods and generates boilerplate to serialize
> each method's arguments as necessary. Presently, there is one such high
> level processor, which relies on each interface it sees to either offer
> specifics on a base class to extend, or extend another interface which in
> turn provides those specifics - I've planned to add a second ("high-er"
> level?) processor, just for the purpose of allowing a synchronous interface
> to be provided and implemented on the server, and the async instance
> generated automatically.
>
>
> Potential future work:
> * "Opaque serialization" for server-originating objects to sign them and
> return them to the server unchanged, for use in eventually implementing the
> JPA features (which otherwise have been left out so far due to the easy
> attack vector it presents).
> * More options for automatic de/serialization, possibly including some
> kind of "violator pattern" tool, support for builder/factories,
> @ConstructorProperties for final fields, etc.
> * Allow disabling polymorphism in whole or in part to save bytes over the
> wire (and more easily support non-Java remote endpoints).
> * "Allocation-free" (or at least "reduced allocation")
> serialization/deserialization, for memory/allocation constrained
> situations, allowing bean-like data to be read or written, but handled on
> at least one endpoint on a field-by-field basis.
>
> --
>
> So, as I continue to polish this and prepare to push builds for others to
> begin trying, I would like to start making packages and groupIds
> consistent. If the direction seems to be that it doesn't belong in
> gwtproject, that's fine by me, plenty of other popular GWT libraries live
> outside the official project, but if we think it might belong here, then to
> avoid later churn in downstream projects, I'd like to start adopting the
> org.gwtproject namespace right away.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "GWT Contributors" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/ba0b000c-2228-4897-94a0-cc9faa42e60f%40googlegroups.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/ba0b000c-2228-4897-94a0-cc9faa42e60f%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email_source=footer>
> .
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
--
*Stefano Ciccarelli*
YAP Division
/ Director
stefano.ciccare...@mmbsoftware.it
*M.M.B. s.r.l.*
via Granarolo, 177/7 - 48018 Faenza (RA) - Italy
tel. +39.0546.637711 - fax +39.0546.46077
www.mmbsoftware.it - i...@mmbsoftware.it
Le informazioni contenute in questa comunicazione sono riservate e
destinate esclusivamente alla/e persona/e o all'ente sopra indicati. E'
vietato ai soggetti diversi dai destinatari qualsiasi uso, copia,
diffusione di quanto in esso contenuto sia ai sensi dell'art. 616 c.p., sia
ai sensi del DL n. 196/03. Se questa comunicazione Vi e' pervenuta per
errore, Vi preghiamo di rispondere a questa e-mail e successivamente
cancellarla dal Vostro sistema.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT
Contributors" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/CAArRkeVLk9ZfOjUusviGd1WBbxY5qen5LCxJ5ifP_RegZKmb%3Dg%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Google Plugin for Eclipse Mars
Thanks for the info. What about the Google App Engine integration? Il giorno mar 18 ott 2016 alle ore 17:16 Brandon Donnelson < branflake2...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > Michael is right, GPE and GPE fork is deprecated. > > - GPE is deprecated (or will be in 4th quarter) > - The new GWT Eclipse Plugin V3 can be installed on mars and neon. The > install will conflict with GPE or GPE-Fork so it will ask you to remove GPE > if it is installed. > - I haven't tested the install GWT Eclipse Plugin V3 with the GPE > uninstall path very much so I'm interested if that works, and if it doesn't > please report back :) > > http://gwt-plugins.github.io/documentation/gwt-eclipse-plugin/Download.html > - 3 options to dowload, the market place is best > > Thanks, > Brandon > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "GWT Users" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- *Stefano Ciccarelli* GAE Application Division / Director stefano.ciccare...@mmbsoftware.it *M.M.B. s.r.l.* via Granarolo, 177/7 - 48018 Faenza (RA) - Italy tel. +39.0546.637711 - fax +39.0546.46077 www.mmbsoftware.it - i...@mmbsoftware.it Le informazioni contenute in questa comunicazione sono riservate e destinate esclusivamente alla/e persona/e o all'ente sopra indicati. E' vietato ai soggetti diversi dai destinatari qualsiasi uso, copia, diffusione di quanto in esso contenuto sia ai sensi dell'art. 616 c.p., sia ai sensi del DL n. 196/03. Se questa comunicazione Vi e' pervenuta per errore, Vi preghiamo di rispondere a questa e-mail e successivamente cancellarla dal Vostro sistema. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [gwt-contrib] JsInterop Generator from webidl
http://www.gwtproject.org/articles/elemental.html Is it the same? Il giorno mer 1 apr 2015 alle 23:32 nick936 niklas...@googlemail.com ha scritto: Hi, while playing with the new JsInterop feature i decided to write a code generator which generate the interfaces out of webidls fetched from https://html.spec.whatwg.org/ or the mozilla repository. Yesterday i started this littel project. It's a prototype and far away from being stable, but enough to use the generated interfaces for test purposes. I did a rather quick and dirty just to use the interfaces my internal test project and the code needs some refactoring. I used ANTLR4, javasoup and javapoet. You can find the sources in this github repo https://github.com/Nickel671/JsInteropGenerator. You can find the generated Interfaces here https://github.com/Nickel671/JsInteropGenerator/tree/master/target/generated-sources/gwt/org/niklas/elemental/Elemental/client/elements. If you are interested in this i will improve it. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GWT Contributors group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/d32b27c4-a1eb-40cb-9720-3d1f6c535b03%40googlegroups.com https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/d32b27c4-a1eb-40cb-9720-3d1f6c535b03%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=emailutm_source=footer . For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GWT Contributors group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/CAK5-kh41Zt_3pz9JdBg5AW3seRCGBGZ8tyk2HK6oqMJj_qqCiw%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Chrome Canary 36 not showing sourcemaps
Chrome 35 too. I ha dato switch back to chrome 34. On Firefox suorce maps are showing, but our project is so big that Firefox became unusable. Il mercoledì 16 aprile 2014, Thad Humphries thad.humphr...@gmail.com ha scritto: I'm trying to use the device emulator in Chrome Canary (v. 36.0.1941.0) to test various mobile devices. I'd like to debug my mobile code with SDM's sourcemaps, but they are not there, unlike on Chrome 34 where sourcemaps are at localhost:9876/sourcemaps/mymodule. Is there a flag I need to add to get sourcemaps, the way I must add --touch-events to test touch events? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comjavascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','google-web-toolkit%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com'); . To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.comjavascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com'); . Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- Nel mondo esistono 10 categorie di persone, quelle che capiscono il binario e quelle che non lo capiscono. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: bugs in 2.5
troll 2013/1/15 timp timprepsc...@gmail.com hello, I lost all of yesterday to two bugs. one is within the provided core jre libraries of 2.5, one is within the core prototypes within V8. Remember the clean room/testing-team-not-developer-team-no-access-to-code/makes-things-which-work movement IBM pushed long ago. I wish it would come back. Although maybe it was all a PR fantasy anyway. Anyhow. The bugs are $1000 for the JRE, and $2000 for the V8. Let me know if you want them. I'm sorry to charge, but, time=money. Bugs bug everywhere. Oh and btw. Sometimes your GWT compiler fails (not the stackoverflow issue reading caches (who wrote that? do you really need to do whatever you are doing recursively?)), and then I run it again, and it succeeds. Pretty sucky. And strange to tell you the truth. Not saying other companies are necessarily less sucky. Btw. Just sucky in different ways. And pretty bad ways actually, the whole destroying privacy thing... not a fan. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/sFqWp4ydnz8J. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- Nel mondo esistono 10 categorie di persone, quelle che capiscono il binario e quelle che non lo capiscono. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
GWT 2.5, -compileReport and closure compiler
I've noticed that if I enable the closure compiler the -compileReport flag is totaly ignored and the soycReport in the extra folder is missing. Someone has a workaround? -- Nel mondo esistono 10 categorie di persone, quelle che capiscono il binario e quelle che non lo capiscono. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: GWT 2.5, -compileReport and closure compiler
Thanks! And about the -XfragmentMerge I was jumping! :D 2012/7/2 Jens jens.nehlme...@gmail.com I've noticed that if I enable the closure compiler the -compileReport flag is totaly ignored and the soycReport in the extra folder is missing. Someone has a workaround? Not yet, but you can compile once without closure compiler to see whats going on during compile and then compile it again with closure compiler and check the generated files to see size differences: - war/permutation strong name.html - war/modulename/deferredjs/permutation strong name/splitpoint.cache.js (one of these files is the left over fragment..it should be the one with the highest number that does not match any split point number) Also when you use -XfragmentMerge for the new code split algorithm it seems like the compile report shows 0 bytes for left over fragment which is clearly wrong (at least in our case here). So don't jump up and be happy if you see 0 bytes for left over ;-) -- J. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/ZBxB_-v72MkJ. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- Nel mondo esistono 10 categorie di persone, quelle che capiscono il binario e quelle che non lo capiscono. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Move Super Dev Mode to the open source repository. (issue1727804)
I've tried setting compiler.stackMode=native and I gained 30 seconds for a single permutation, I don't need it during development so I now a compiles takes around 80/90 seconds. Now I'm trying to implement the IncrementalGenerator interface on my generators but GeneratorContext.isGeneratorResultCachingEnabled() seems to be always false. 2012/6/10 Ray Cromwell cromwell...@google.com looks like you have compiler.stackMode = emulated. It won't solve your problem, but it should shave off some time to set it to 'native'. One thing puzzles me is even the linker stage is taking 15 seconds for you. That stage doesn't really do much but write files and create the nocache.js script. There might be some degenerate issue there. Seems like a significant amount of time is spend running RPC generators and ClientBundle, even though it is not supposed to. -Ray On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 11:54 PM, Stefano Ciccarelli sciccare...@gmail.com wrote: The full compile takes ~16 minutes for 8 permutations. About the SuperDevMode the first compile takes ~260 seconds for 2 permutations, the subsequent compiles takes from 120-160 seconds each (1 permutation). The speedtracer.html file is attached. I have 4gb of ram and I'm using -Xmx1024m. I'm sure the performance will improve, the real problem now is that it is a pain to use with gwt-rpc because I have to deal with generated *.gwt.rpc files. -- Inviato con Sparrow Il giorno sabato 9 giugno 2012, alle ore 21:26, Ray Cromwell ha scritto: BTW, can you send me the speedtracer.html file in your /tmp/*codeserver/* directory? On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Stefano Ciccarelli sciccare...@gmail.com wrote: My app is 60 lines of code and compiles in 120 seconds: a lot of uibinder, a lot of classes in rpc, gin… so a lots of generators. -- Sent with Sparrow Il giorno venerdì 8 giugno 2012, alle ore 22:38, Ray Cromwell ha scritto: I just checked again, one of the internal apps we are trying SuperDevMode against has about 400,000 lines of code and combines in about 7-8 seconds. So maybe your app has 6x as much code? If not, it gives us a clue that perhaps there's some other edge condition causing the compile to be slow. -Ray On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Ray Cromwell cromwell...@google.com wrote: How big is your app? (KLOC) Internally, we'd had success with 10s refresh on some fairly largish apps. I'm wondering if something else isn't going on. Note that the first compile usually takes long, but subsequent ones are faster. Are you using UiBinder? One issue could be generators using too much time. On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:21 AM, Jens jens.nehlme...@gmail.com wrote: Just to finish this off in case anyone else has the same problem - this was fixed in r11031. https://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=11031 Thanks for the info. I had the same problem but now it works. Now lets hope the compilation process will become a lot faster in the future. A single permutation of our app compiles on the code server in ~45 seconds and thats not really acceptable during development compared to the classic DevMode. -- J. -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -- Nel mondo esistono 10 categorie di persone, quelle che capiscono il binario e quelle che non lo capiscono. -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Re: GWT 2.5 RC1 Is Here!
Our project compiles in 9 minutes with GWT 2.4 and 17 minutes with GWT 2.5.rc1. I think this is not acceptable to save only a 10% in Javascript size. -- Inviato con Sparrow (http://www.sparrowmailapp.com/?sig) Il giorno mercoledì 27 giugno 2012, alle ore 22:39, Rajeev Dayal ha scritto: Hey all, We're excited to announce the GWT 2.5 Release Candidate! Read about it on the GWT Blog (http://googlewebtoolkit.blogspot.com/2012/06/gwt-2.html), and download it here (http://developers.google.com/web-toolkit/download) (bottom of the page). The RC has been uploaded to Maven Central with the version string of 2.5.0-rc1. Please give it a try and let us know your feedback! Also, many thanks to all of you for your contributions. Without your help, we wouldn't have had a GWT 2.5 release at all! -Rajeev, on behalf of the GWT team -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/PvOse0s5gwAJ. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com (mailto:google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com). To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com (mailto:google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com). For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: GWT 2.5 RC1 Is Here!
My times are with closure disabled!!! And code server takes never less than two minutes to compile a single permutation of the same app. -- Sent with Sparrow (http://www.sparrowmailapp.com/?sig) Il giorno giovedì 28 giugno 2012, alle ore 19:21, Dennis Haupt ha scritto: same here. enabling the closure compiler almost doubles the compilation time. but i don't care, i only have to run the compiler in this mode before a release. the code server takes about 10 seconds to handle a change in the same app. Am 28.06.2012 18:47, schrieb Stefano Ciccarelli: Our project compiles in 9 minutes with GWT 2.4 and 17 minutes with GWT 2.5.rc1. I think this is not acceptable to save only a 10% in Javascript size. -- Inviato con Sparrow http://www.sparrowmailapp.com/?sig Il giorno mercoledě 27 giugno 2012, alle ore 22:39, Rajeev Dayal ha scritto: Hey all, We're excited to announce the GWT 2.5 Release Candidate! Read about it on the GWT Blog http://googlewebtoolkit.blogspot.com/2012/06/gwt-2.html, and download it here http://developers.google.com/web-toolkit/download (bottom of the page). The RC has been uploaded to Maven Central with the version string of 2.5.0-rc1. Please give it a try and let us know your feedback! Also, many thanks to all of you for your contributions. Without your help, we wouldn't have had a GWT 2.5 release at all! -Rajeev, on behalf of the GWT team -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/PvOse0s5gwAJ. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com mailto:google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com mailto:google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: SuperDevMode and APT
Great idea! It should work on GAE too using UrlFetch api to talk with the code server. Could you share some pieces of code, please? -- Inviato con Sparrow (http://www.sparrowmailapp.com/?sig) Il giorno giovedì 14 giugno 2012, alle ore 11:33, Paul Robinson ha scritto: On 13/06/12 18:53, Andrea Boscolo wrote: I can confirm that copying the CodeServer's .gwt.rpc files in the local war dir, works but it's a pain: every time they change, they need to be copied. There's an alternative to copying gwt.rpc files. I've changed my app so that when it looks for the serialization policy, and it can't find it, it will ask the code server for it. You just need to parse the module base URL to get the module name, and then use the strong name provided to generate the appropriate URL, something like: http://localhost:9876/modulename/strongname.gwt.rpc All I need to do now is to add the codeserver URL as a parameter in web.xml (http://web.xml) so that this feature can be enabled/disabled so it doesn't happen in production. I don't know whether this technique would work on GAE as well. Paul -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com (mailto:google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com). To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com (mailto:google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com). For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: Firefox 13 DevMode Plugin
When will this version appear on the official download page so we can auto update? 2012/6/7 Alan Leung acle...@google.com For folks with shinny Windows OSes. http://acleung.com/ff13-win.xpi -Alan On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 12:46 PM, koma k...@koma.be wrote: working now fine on 64bit linux thx ! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/8dQJQ1FXteAJ. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- Nel mondo esistono 10 categorie di persone, quelle che capiscono il binario e quelle che non lo capiscono. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: Firefox 13 DevMode Plugin
Ok. Thanks. I'll wait :) -- Sent with Sparrow (http://www.sparrowmailapp.com/?sig) Il giorno lunedì 11 giugno 2012, alle ore 23:41, Alan Leung ha scritto: I have to go thought a few internal review process before that happens. On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 8:26 AM, Stefano Ciccarelli sciccare...@gmail.com (mailto:sciccare...@gmail.com) wrote: When will this version appear on the official download page so we can auto update? 2012/6/7 Alan Leung acle...@google.com (mailto:acle...@google.com) For folks with shinny Windows OSes. http://acleung.com/ff13-win.xpi -Alan On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 12:46 PM, koma k...@koma.be (mailto:k...@koma.be) wrote: working now fine on 64bit linux thx ! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/8dQJQ1FXteAJ. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com (mailto:google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com). To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com (mailto:google-web-toolkit%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com). For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com (mailto:google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com). To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com (mailto:google-web-toolkit%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com). For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- Nel mondo esistono 10 categorie di persone, quelle che capiscono il binario e quelle che non lo capiscono. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com (mailto:google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com). To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com (mailto:google-web-toolkit%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com). For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Move Super Dev Mode to the open source repository. (issue1727804)
My app is 60 lines of code and compiles in 120 seconds: a lot of uibinder, a lot of classes in rpc, gin… so a lots of generators. -- Sent with Sparrow (http://www.sparrowmailapp.com/?sig) Il giorno venerdì 8 giugno 2012, alle ore 22:38, Ray Cromwell ha scritto: I just checked again, one of the internal apps we are trying SuperDevMode against has about 400,000 lines of code and combines in about 7-8 seconds. So maybe your app has 6x as much code? If not, it gives us a clue that perhaps there's some other edge condition causing the compile to be slow. -Ray On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Ray Cromwell cromwell...@google.com wrote: How big is your app? (KLOC) Internally, we'd had success with 10s refresh on some fairly largish apps. I'm wondering if something else isn't going on. Note that the first compile usually takes long, but subsequent ones are faster. Are you using UiBinder? One issue could be generators using too much time. On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:21 AM, Jens jens.nehlme...@gmail.com wrote: Just to finish this off in case anyone else has the same problem - this was fixed in r11031. https://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=11031 Thanks for the info. I had the same problem but now it works. Now lets hope the compilation process will become a lot faster in the future. A single permutation of our app compiles on the code server in ~45 seconds and thats not really acceptable during development compared to the classic DevMode. -- J. -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
SuperDevMode and APT
Hello, I'm poking with SuperDevMode just to understand how it works and I faced the first problem: how to deal with APT generated classes? They are generated to .apt_generated directory and aren't found by CodeServer, on the other side I can only specify one dir as -src to CodeServer. Ideas? -- Nel mondo esistono 10 categorie di persone, quelle che capiscono il binario e quelle che non lo capiscono. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: SuperDevMode and APT
Yes, I've tried it and doesn't work, but the -cp solution works well. Now I have to understand how to deal with gwt-rpc because the server misses .gwt.rpc files... 2012/6/8 Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com Are you sure -src src -src .apt_generated doesn't work? On Friday, June 8, 2012 12:36:22 PM UTC+2, Stefano Ciccarelli wrote: Hello, I'm poking with SuperDevMode just to understand how it works and I faced the first problem: how to deal with APT generated classes? They are generated to .apt_generated directory and aren't found by CodeServer, on the other side I can only specify one dir as -src to CodeServer. Ideas? -- Nel mondo esistono 10 categorie di persone, quelle che capiscono il binario e quelle che non lo capiscono. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/ovaa4RN1sqMJ. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- Nel mondo esistono 10 categorie di persone, quelle che capiscono il binario e quelle che non lo capiscono. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: SuperDevMode and APT
I know, I'm using App Engine as a servlet container. But the problem is to generate .gwt.rpc files that are compatibles with the compiled javascript generated by SuperDevMode. 2012/6/8 Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com On Friday, June 8, 2012 2:04:48 PM UTC+2, Stefano Ciccarelli wrote: Yes, I've tried it and doesn't work, but the -cp solution works well. Now I have to understand how to deal with gwt-rpc because the server misses .gwt.rpc files... CodeServer is only about the code server part [1] (although it can serve your static resources too, for cases where you don't have server-side code), you still need a Servlet container if you have server-side code. [1] https://developers.google.com/web-toolkit/doc/latest/DevGuideCompilingAndDebugging#DevGuideDevMode -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/JBlBvMXgmrYJ. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- Nel mondo esistono 10 categorie di persone, quelle che capiscono il binario e quelle che non lo capiscono. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: SuperDevMode and APT
The .gwt.rpc files are correctly generated in the war relative to the CodeServer workDir, I have to found a way to copy them to the container war when they change (not quite often), would be nice if the CodeServer could do that for me :) 2012/6/8 Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com On Friday, June 8, 2012 2:18:28 PM UTC+2, Stefano Ciccarelli wrote: I know, I'm using App Engine as a servlet container. But the problem is to generate .gwt.rpc files that are compatibles with the compiled javascript generated by SuperDevMode. Oops, sorry; I read too fast. Switch to RequestFactory? ;-) More seriously, I doubt it'll ever be possible to use GWT-RPC with SuperDevMode, due to how/where it generates its output; though maybe you could tweak the way serialization policies are loaded on the server-side? (hmm, with AppEngine, that might be impossible, as you'd have to access files on the file-system; or maybe set SuperDevMode's workDir as a subfolder of your -war?) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/Rj4sG6PpW_oJ. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- Nel mondo esistono 10 categorie di persone, quelle che capiscono il binario e quelle che non lo capiscono. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: Firefox 13 DevMode Plugin
Thanks. I hope you could put it on the official download page because I'm still stuck on Firefox 11. -- Sent with Sparrow (http://www.sparrowmailapp.com/?sig) Il giorno martedì 5 giugno 2012, alle ore 20:05, Alan Leung ha scritto: If anyone is wondering, I am aware and working on it. -Alan -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: how to use Showcase as a library?
setAutoOpen(true) on ManuBar instance (autoOpen=true as a uibinder attribute) -- Stefano Ciccarelli Sent with Sparrow (http://www.sparrowmailapp.com/?sig) On Thursday 10 May 2012 at 22:40, gwt-dev wrote: Hi, I've been trying to find a GWT example to automatically expand menu on mouse-over -- the kind of UI behavior so common on websites these days. I finally found it in Showcase that came with GWT-2.4 (the menu bar example). However the source code uses annotations and other stuff I have never seen in any GWT tutorial or book (there hasn't any GWT books in last couple years or so, a hint that GWT is really not that hot these days). I really want to use the menu popup on mouse-over feature, but can't easily copy it from code, and when I jar'ed the classes and used the jar in my project, I get this compile error: [ERROR] Line 156: No source code is available for type com.google.gwt.sample.showcase.client.content.lists.CwMenuBar; did you forget to inherit a required module? Any suggestion on how to package the Showcase to a jar, or a pointer to a good tutorial? I really hope GWT developers at Google write some good tutorials on how to use these basic features. Forget the fancy ones like drag-n- drop -- how many websites need that? thanks in advance. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: Why is the registration to Google I/O Closed?
You are late. All the tickets were sold in 20 minutes. -- Stefano Ciccarelli Sent with Sparrow (http://www.sparrowmailapp.com/?sig) On Friday 20 April 2012 at 15:18, skippy wrote: Is the event full? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: IntegerBox not restricting input to integers in GWT 2.4.0
This is exactly what we have done. Turning every field red when it is invalid in real time (as a key is pressed) is definitely better. -- Stefano Ciccarelli Sent with Sparrow (http://www.sparrowmailapp.com/?sig) On Friday 20 April 2012 at 20:34, Andrei wrote: Alfredo, What you propose is a bad design - from a usability perspective. When a user presses a button and nothing happens, many users would assume that your app is broken (they did press a letter for some reason!) It's much better to give those less-than-sophisticated users a chance to type a letter and then provide some feedback that this field only accepts numbers. Also, this way you can be consistent throughout all widgets. For example, you can't prevent people from typing letters or numbers in the DatePicker field. But they can type something which can't be parsed into a date. When they do, the DatePicker turns red. You can have exactly the same behavior with the IntegerBox - and any other user input. On a side note, I wish the GWT was itself more consistent with their implementations - like having IntegerBox, LongBox, DoubleBox, and DatePicker react in the same way to parsing errors. Andrei -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: 1 permutation to rule them all
I think you should read this: https://developers.google.com/web-toolkit/doc/latest/DevGuideCodingBasicsDeferredhttps://developers.google.com/web-toolkit/doc/latest/DevGuideCodingBasicsDeferred?hl=it 2012/3/26 dmen dmenou...@gmail.com GWT has a fundamental architecture flaw. It should not be necessary to compile the whole code base more than exactly once. Deferred binding is great for implementing algorithms dynamically. For I18N is obviously wrong IMO. Thankfully that can be avoided. Ideally only a thin DOM abstraction layer should be different for each browser, physically separated and loaded from the bootstrap code. Deferred binding at the widget level should not be have happened! Just my thoughts. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- Nel mondo esistono 10 categorie di persone, quelle che capiscono il binario e quelle che non lo capiscono. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Window.confirm() on Chrome 16 throws an exception.
I'm using GWT 2.4. On Chrome 16 (beta) when I call Window.confirm I get an exception. The stack trace is: Caused by: java.lang.Throwable: (TypeError): Cannot read property 'hasPort' of undefined at com.google.gwt.dev.shell.BrowserChannelServer.invokeJavascript(BrowserChannelServer.java:248) at com.google.gwt.dev.shell.ModuleSpaceOOPHM.doInvoke(ModuleSpaceOOPHM.java:136) at com.google.gwt.dev.shell.ModuleSpace.invokeNative(ModuleSpace.java:561) at com.google.gwt.dev.shell.ModuleSpace.invokeNativeBoolean(ModuleSpace.java:184) at com.google.gwt.dev.shell.JavaScriptHost.invokeNativeBoolean(JavaScriptHost.java:35) at com.google.gwt.user.client.Window.confirm(Window.java) at it.indacosoftware.yap.client.forms.home.HomePresenter.processEvent(HomePresenter.java:1133) The dialog is correctly displayed then when I click Ok or Cancel I get the exception. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/N82CWJhwzFgJ. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: GWT and concurrency
There is no preemption. The events are polled when the thread is idle
and in your example the thread is not idle because is stuck in your
endless and freezing cycle.
On Sunday, September 19, 2010, Johannes Lehmann
johannes.lehma...@googlemail.com wrote:
I appreciate that with JavaScript interpreters executing in one thread
there will never be any *true* concurrency. However it seems perfectly
possible for concurrency issues to arise with the way that
asynchronous callbacks are used A simple example is if I am
continuously checking the value of a variable x, and then incrementing
it:
while(!stop) {
int i = x;
x = i+1;
}
Once the event occurs, the handler prints the variable and sets a flag
that causes the incrementing to stop:
print(x);
stop = true;
The intended behavior might be that the final value of the counter is
printed. However if the event handler is invoked right after the
assignment 'int i = x', the value will be incremented one more time
after it is printed, which is a concurrency bug.
In such cases the synchronized keyword could have been used to define
pieces of code which must not be interrupted by other pieces of code
in such way. In plain Java the synchronized keyword provides an easy
way of dealing with such issues. The problem I described in my first
post is very similar to this in nature and I am lost as to what to do.
I hope this makes what I mean a bit clearer. Of course I am not
excluding the possibility that I just misunderstood somthing about how
the GWT/JavaScript eventing mechanism works.
Thanks,
Johannes
On Sep 17, 5:40 pm, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sep 17, 4:13 pm, Johannes Lehmann
johannes.lehma...@googlemail.com wrote:
OK, that is basically what I assumed. This however seems to create
concurrency issues, which the synchronized keyword was designed to
address. Without any language support such as semaphores or mutexes
and without any guarantees regarding preemption, how could I solve a
problem such as the above?
Excuse my ignorance about semaphores/mutexes/preemption details, but
how can there be concurrency issues if things never execute
concurrently? (and *your* code will never execute concurrently with
*your* code)
If you really want the gory
details:http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/webappapi...
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
--
*Stefano Ciccarelli*
stef...@indacosoftware.it
*Indaco srl*
via Sabin, 22 - 40017 San Giovanni in Persiceto (BO) - Italy
tel. +39.051.827762 - fax +39.051.6874570
i...@indacosoftware.it
www.indacosoftware.it
*- This e-mail is confidential and may be read, copied and used only by the
intended recipient. If you have received it in error, please contact the
sender immediately by return e-mail. Please then delete the e-mail and do
not disclose its contents to any other person.
- Le informazioni contenute in questa comunicazione sono riservate e
destinate esclusivamente alla/e persona/e o all'ente sopra indicati. E'
vietato ai soggetti diversi dai destinatari qualsiasi uso, copia, diffusione
di quanto in esso contenuto sia ai sensi dell'art. 616 c.p., sia ai sensi
del DL n. 196/03. Se questa comunicazione Vi e' pervenuta per errore, Vi
preghiamo di rispondere a questa e-mail e successivamente cancellarla dal
Vostro sistema.*
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: Reflection: Get Variable Name
If you plan to use PHP I suggest to use rest, json and the RequestBuilder. http://www.google.it/search?sourceid=chromeie=UTF-8q=php+rest+jsonqscrl=1 http://www.google.it/search?sourceid=chromeie=UTF-8q=php+rest+jsonqscrl=1 http://code.google.com/intl/it-IT/webtoolkit/doc/latest/DevGuideServerCommunication.html#DevGuideHttpRequests http://code.google.com/intl/it-IT/webtoolkit/doc/latest/DevGuideServerCommunication.html#DevGuideHttpRequests On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 01:17, Maurice Nee lyden...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks again for the reply. I was planning to send the generated query to a PHP file on the server that connects to a MySQL database and executes the query, but point taken about the security hole. So how would I go about doing this then? Can I just make regular Java classes in the server package of my GWT project and then use RPC to send my DTOs across the wire to those classes where I can use Reflection to analyze the DTOs and build queries from them? Then I guess I would use JDBC to execute the query... Also, will I need to setup a servlet container like Tomcat on the server? On Aug 5, 6:46 pm, Ian Petersen ispet...@gmail.com wrote: As GWT is client-side only it has no direct access to any SQL database (modulo whatever I don't know about client-side storage in HTML5) so generating SQL in GWT is either a waste of time or a security hole waiting to happen. Your server should definitely not be trusting SQL generated on the client! If you want to do what you've described, you need to do it on the server, in regular Java, where reflection works as usual. Ian On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 3:06 PM, Maurice Nee lyden...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks for the reply. Generators seem like a lot to swallow. I'm trying to introspect a set of DTO's that I want to marshall to and from a database. I would like to be able to make use of the convention over configuration principle and have my DTO class names = table names in the database and have my Java field names = field names in the database. Then I was hoping to use reflection to dynamically build SQL queries based on the given DTO. Am I out of luck with GWT? Also, I don't have time for the Hibernate learning curve. Hibernate + GWT + Gilead + Maven + Spring = Will not meet deadline :) On Aug 5, 5:20 pm, Ian Petersen ispet...@gmail.com wrote: At run time, it's impossible. At compile time, you use the generator API. Back in the GWT 1.5 time frame it wasn't well documented but that may have changed since. Ian On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 1:42 PM, Maurice Nee lyden...@gmail.com wrote: How can I get a variable's name in GWT? How can I get a collection of declared variables in a class in GWT? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-web-toolkit%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group athttp:// groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-web-toolkit%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group athttp:// groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-web-toolkit%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- *Stefano Ciccarelli* stef...@indacosoftware.it *Indaco srl* via Sabin, 22 - 40017 San Giovanni in Persiceto (BO) - Italy tel. +39.051.827762 - fax +39.051.6874570 i...@indacosoftware.it www.indacosoftware.it *- This e-mail is confidential and may be read, copied and used only by the intended recipient. If you have received it in error, please contact the sender immediately by return e-mail. Please then delete the e-mail and do not disclose its contents to any other person. - Le informazioni contenute in questa comunicazione sono riservate e destinate esclusivamente alla/e persona/e o all'ente sopra indicati. E' vietato ai soggetti diversi dai destinatari qualsiasi uso, copia, diffusione di quanto in esso contenuto sia ai sensi dell'art. 616 c.p., sia ai sensi del DL n. 196/03. Se questa comunicazione Vi e' pervenuta per errore, Vi preghiamo di rispondere a questa e-mail e successivamente cancellarla
Re: Get week number from a Date object
If you need the ISO week this is what I'm using in GWT:
private static final int ISO_THURSDAY = 4;
private static final int MAX_DAY_OF_WEEK = 6;
private static final int DAYS_IN_WEEK = 7;
private static final long MILLIS_DAY = 8640;
@SuppressWarnings(deprecation)
public int getWeek() {
// http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:ISO_week_date#Algorithms
final Date date = toDate();
// ISO week day (Mon=1 to Sun=7)
final int dayOfWeek = 1 + (date.getDay() + MAX_DAY_OF_WEEK) %
DAYS_IN_WEEK;
final Date nearestThu = addDays(date, ISO_THURSDAY - dayOfWeek);
final int year = nearestThu.getYear();
final Date jan1 = new Date(year, 0, 1);
return 1 + dayDiff(nearestThu, jan1) / DAYS_IN_WEEK;
}
public static Date addDays(final Date sourceDate, final long days) {
return new Date(sourceDate.getTime() + (days * MILLIS_DAY));
}
public static int dayDiff(final Date firstDate, final Date secondDate) {
return (int) ((firstDate.getTime() - secondDate.getTime()) /
MILLIS_DAY);
}
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 17:15, Glimpse frederic.bonj...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello all,
I'd like to know if there is an easy way to get the week number from a
Date object. In pure Java, the Calendar class does the trick via a
call to get(Calendar.WEEK_OF_YEAR); but the Calendar class is not
available in GWT.
Any idea?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-web-toolkit%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
--
*Stefano Ciccarelli*
stef...@indacosoftware.it
*Indaco srl*
via Sabin, 22 - 40017 San Giovanni in Persiceto (BO) - Italy
tel. +39.051.827762 - fax +39.051.6874570
i...@indacosoftware.it
www.indacosoftware.it
*- This e-mail is confidential and may be read, copied and used only by the
intended recipient. If you have received it in error, please contact the
sender immediately by return e-mail. Please then delete the e-mail and do
not disclose its contents to any other person.
- Le informazioni contenute in questa comunicazione sono riservate e
destinate esclusivamente alla/e persona/e o all'ente sopra indicati. E'
vietato ai soggetti diversi dai destinatari qualsiasi uso, copia, diffusione
di quanto in esso contenuto sia ai sensi dell'art. 616 c.p., sia ai sensi
del DL n. 196/03. Se questa comunicazione Vi e' pervenuta per errore, Vi
preghiamo di rispondere a questa e-mail e successivamente cancellarla dal
Vostro sistema.*
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: GWT 2.0 is unusable in IE7
I have the same problem described here and I can assure you that I'm using the standard mode. The problem is only with IE7 and I've solved it using the popup implementation for IE8 (without iframe) in IE6/IE7 dropping support for IE6. On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 7:46 PM, Joel Webber j...@google.com wrote: I can assure you that this is not a general problem -- we've built plenty of applications (including the Mail sample) which work fine using a structure very much like the one you describe. If it's only happening on IE, there's a very good probability that you're running using a quirks-mode doctype (i.e., no !doctype html). If that fixes the problem, would you please update issue 4532 to reflect that? On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 9:45 AM, nagin naginkoth...@gmail.com wrote: I am developing Web application using GWT 2.0. I am using Layout panel which is added to RootLayout panel. In IE 7 when we open dialog box, popup panel, menu item or date picker or any thing that pop ups , then all widgets on the screen except popup disappears . when these pop ups are closed then everything reappears. This is very irritating to user and make application unusable . I had open issue #4532 a month back, but nobody from GWT team have attended or accepted and looked into it yet . It is very surprising that such critical issue is not been attended to. I hope that GWT team will look into it and try to resolve this earliest. thanks Nagin -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-web-toolkit%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: DialogBox problem in IE
I have the same problem. The showcase works because it doesn't use standard mode. I noticed that the root cause is the iframe used to hide the input tags in IE6. On Friday, February 19, 2010, obesga obe...@gmail.com wrote: Well, some hot news. If I display the dialgo box in ie7, the underlying web elements dissapear. But if I open a new tab, and load GWT showcase, the dialo box of the showcase works ok. And if I return to the previous tab - my app - then the page renders correctly (taaachn !!) WTF ??? On Feb 19, 12:18 pm, obesga obe...@gmail.com wrote: I've a problem with GWT 2.0.1 and the DialogBox class, with the standarts mode on the page (aka !DOCTYPE html) When I create and how a DialogBox ( with center() ) the rest of the application dissapears, resulting in a white page only with the dialog on top. When the dialog hides, the other elements return to visible... ¿ Do you know why is this happening and how to fix it ? thankks (It don't seem to appear a issue or this theme on the forum... I'm the only with this problem ? ) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: How to use g:DialogBox UIBinder definition from Java
Sorry, I was talking about Thomas Broyer solution #1.
Your code (pastebin) is what I was already doing.
BTW this is the .java:
public final class AboutDialogDisplay {
@Inject
private AboutDialogDisplay() {
uiBinder.createAndBindUi(this);
}
@UiFactory
DialogBox thatsJustMe() {
return this;
}
}
And this is the .ui.xml:
g:DialogBox animationEnabled=true glassEnabled=true modal=true
..
/g:DialogBox
Thanks
Stefano
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 4:46 PM, Christian Goudreau
goudreau.christ...@gmail.com wrote:
First, give us your code for you .java and for your .ui.xml.
I'll see what I can do for you, I also had some problems first time I
tried this. Note that I'm using Gwt-Presenter in my example.
Christian
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 10:24 AM, Stefano Ciccarelli
sciccare...@gmail.com wrote:
Solution #1 doesn't work for me. I get this error:
Second attempt to set initializer for field f_DialogBox1, from new
com.google.gwt.user.client.ui.DialogBox(false, true) to
owner.thatsJustMe()
Hints or suggestions?
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 5:44 PM, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 9, 12:00 pm, Ovidiu Gheorghies ogheorgh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
The DialogBox API (http://google-web-toolkit.googlecode.com/svn/
javadoc/2.0/com/google/gwt/user/client/ui/DialogBox.html) notes that a
DialogBox can be defined as a UIBinder template as follows:
g:DialogBox autoHide=true modal=true
g:captionbCaption text/b/g:caption
g:HTMLPanel
Body text
g:Button ui:field='cancelButton'Cancel/g:Button
g:Button ui:field='okButton'Okay/g:Button
/g:HTMLPanel
/g:DialogBox
What is the proper way of using this definition from Java code?
Supposing that the above definition is contained in
NotificationWindow.ui.xml, the following naive approach to
NotificationWindow.java does not work:
public class NotificationWindow extends Composite {
private static NotificationWindowUiBinder uiBinder =
GWT.create(NotificationWindowUiBinder.class);
interface NotificationWindowUiBinder extends UiBinderWidget,
NotificationWindow {}
@UiField DialogBox dialogBox;
public NotificationWindow() {
initWidget(uiBinder.createAndBindUi(this));
}
public void show() {
dialogBox.show();
}
}
If the EntryPoint-derived class calls:
(new NotificationWindow()).show();
then the following exception is logged:
java.lang.IllegalStateException: This widget's parent does not
implement HasWidgets
How is the g:DialogBox definition from the DialogBox API used
correctly from Java code?
There are two possibilities: inheriting DialogBox or having a
DialogBox field (but then not inheriting a Widget).
Solution #1: inheriting a DialogBox
class NotificationWindow extends DialogBox {
...
public NotificationWindow() {
// we don't care about the returned value, it'll be 'this'
uiBinder.createAndBindUi(this);
}
@UiFactory
DialogBox thatsJustMe() {
// UiBinder will call this to get a DialogBox instance
// and this is the DialogBox instance we want to use
return this;
}
...
}
Solution #2: not inheriting DialogBox
// Note: do NOT inherit Composite, Widget or UIObject!
class NotificationWindow {
...
private DialogBox dialogBox;
public NotificationWindow() {
dialogBox = uiBinder.createAndBind(this);
}
public void show() {
dialogBox.show();
}
...
}
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com
.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-web-toolkit%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-web-toolkit%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-web-toolkit%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post
Re: How to use g:DialogBox UIBinder definition from Java
I'm already doing like you, but I'd like to try the solution #1 explained by
Thomas Broyer, so the code is from that test. The class already extends
DialogBox and I get the error reported, the extends is missing because I
done something wrong with cutpaste.
I need @Inject because that class is the Display injected in a Presenter.
I want to try that solution because I prefer to extends DialogBox.
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 5:16 PM, Christian Goudreau
goudreau.christ...@gmail.com wrote:
Oh no his solution #2 isn't like mine at all, lol, but anyway, do you
really need @Inject ? There's nothing to inject in your example.
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 11:11 AM, Christian Goudreau
goudreau.christ...@gmail.com wrote:
In your code, for solution #1, you need to extends DialogBox, you forgot
that.
For my solution, I only encapsulate DialogBox within an HTMLPanel an then
I added two public function for showing and hiding my dialogbox. (Solution
#2) Btw, I found solution #2 less intrusive and more simple.
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 10:58 AM, Stefano Ciccarelli
sciccare...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry, I was talking about Thomas Broyer solution #1.
Your code (pastebin) is what I was already doing.
BTW this is the .java:
public final class AboutDialogDisplay {
@Inject
private AboutDialogDisplay() {
uiBinder.createAndBindUi(this);
}
@UiFactory
DialogBox thatsJustMe() {
return this;
}
}
And this is the .ui.xml:
g:DialogBox animationEnabled=true glassEnabled=true modal=true
..
/g:DialogBox
Thanks
Stefano
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 4:46 PM, Christian Goudreau
goudreau.christ...@gmail.com wrote:
First, give us your code for you .java and for your .ui.xml.
I'll see what I can do for you, I also had some problems first time I
tried this. Note that I'm using Gwt-Presenter in my example.
Christian
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 10:24 AM, Stefano Ciccarelli
sciccare...@gmail.com wrote:
Solution #1 doesn't work for me. I get this error:
Second attempt to set initializer for field f_DialogBox1, from new
com.google.gwt.user.client.ui.DialogBox(false, true) to
owner.thatsJustMe()
Hints or suggestions?
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 5:44 PM, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.comwrote:
On Feb 9, 12:00 pm, Ovidiu Gheorghies ogheorgh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
The DialogBox API (http://google-web-toolkit.googlecode.com/svn/
javadoc/2.0/com/google/gwt/user/client/ui/DialogBox.html) notes that
a
DialogBox can be defined as a UIBinder template as follows:
g:DialogBox autoHide=true modal=true
g:captionbCaption text/b/g:caption
g:HTMLPanel
Body text
g:Button ui:field='cancelButton'Cancel/g:Button
g:Button ui:field='okButton'Okay/g:Button
/g:HTMLPanel
/g:DialogBox
What is the proper way of using this definition from Java code?
Supposing that the above definition is contained in
NotificationWindow.ui.xml, the following naive approach to
NotificationWindow.java does not work:
public class NotificationWindow extends Composite {
private static NotificationWindowUiBinder uiBinder =
GWT.create(NotificationWindowUiBinder.class);
interface NotificationWindowUiBinder extends
UiBinderWidget,
NotificationWindow {}
@UiField DialogBox dialogBox;
public NotificationWindow() {
initWidget(uiBinder.createAndBindUi(this));
}
public void show() {
dialogBox.show();
}
}
If the EntryPoint-derived class calls:
(new NotificationWindow()).show();
then the following exception is logged:
java.lang.IllegalStateException: This widget's parent does not
implement HasWidgets
How is the g:DialogBox definition from the DialogBox API used
correctly from Java code?
There are two possibilities: inheriting DialogBox or having a
DialogBox field (but then not inheriting a Widget).
Solution #1: inheriting a DialogBox
class NotificationWindow extends DialogBox {
...
public NotificationWindow() {
// we don't care about the returned value, it'll be 'this'
uiBinder.createAndBindUi(this);
}
@UiFactory
DialogBox thatsJustMe() {
// UiBinder will call this to get a DialogBox instance
// and this is the DialogBox instance we want to use
return this;
}
...
}
Solution #2: not inheriting DialogBox
// Note: do NOT inherit Composite, Widget or UIObject!
class NotificationWindow {
...
private DialogBox dialogBox;
public NotificationWindow() {
dialogBox = uiBinder.createAndBind(this);
}
public void show() {
dialogBox.show();
}
...
}
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to
google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr
Re: SuggestBox hides RootLayoutPanel and all its contents
This is my dirty solution: !-- To solve a Popup bug in IE7 -- !-- the code doesn't works anymore on IE6 -- replace-with class=com.google.gwt.user.client.ui.impl.PopupImpl when-type-is class=com.google.gwt.user.client.ui.impl.PopupImpl/ when-property-is name=user.agent value=ie6 / /replace-with but you have to drop IE6 support. On 2 Feb, 08:41, hriess hriess.chemn...@t-online.de wrote: Is there in the meantime a solution for this problem? I am using a DockLayoutPanel for the layout of the application. A SuggestBox (and other PopupPanels) blanks the complete screen in IE7. After upgrade to GWT 2.0, UiBinder and LayoutPanels I haven't tested my application with IE7 for a long time. Have I to go back in time and check out a rather old SVN version of my application? Thank you Holger -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
