Re: Chrome Canary 73.0.3680.0 breaks pretty much ALL GWT apps :(
What should be done , if can not switch to 2.8.2 for some reason? On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 12:04 AM Rob wrote: > Good to hear that 2.8.2 fixes it. Gives me an excuse to try and get our > main app upgraded, unfortunately it's quite a complex app with a lot of > inherited libraries so switching to 2.8.2 involves a fair bit more than > just changing a version number. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "GWT Users" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- Nagin Kothari Co-founder, Zilicus Solutions www.zilicus.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: GWT release prioritization
Yes, I agree too +1 for this On Thursday, August 20, 2015 at 1:21:41 AM UTC+5:30, steve Zara wrote: Yes, this would be helpful. On Monday, 10 August 2015 11:33:42 UTC+1, James Horsley wrote: Any chance someone from the steering committee could comment on this? On 3 August 2015 at 09:37, maticpetek matic...@gmail.com wrote: 1+ On Friday, July 31, 2015 at 11:39:00 AM UTC+2, James Horsley wrote: Firstly, I am very much looking forward to the next generation j2cl compiler for GWT and think the new compiler vision is great. That said, I think the community would benefit greatly with the steering committee placing a higher priority on closing out on the 2.8 release. I know that the current 2.8 is considered usable for production but 2.8 isn't feature complete and organizations can be very hesitant to use non-GA versions of libraries. In particular it would be a big win to have a done version of JsInterop v1 and clear guidance on using the current version of elemental. I, and I'm sure the rest of the GWT community, would greatly appreciate a clearer view on current release expectations and prioritization; is there anything you guys can share on that front? Again, really appreciate the recent work and love the plans for GWT 3.0. Cheers, James -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-we...@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: GWT release prioritization
Yes, I agree +1 for this On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 1:21 AM, steve Zara steve.z...@googlemail.com wrote: Yes, this would be helpful. On Monday, 10 August 2015 11:33:42 UTC+1, James Horsley wrote: Any chance someone from the steering committee could comment on this? On 3 August 2015 at 09:37, maticpetek matic...@gmail.com wrote: 1+ On Friday, July 31, 2015 at 11:39:00 AM UTC+2, James Horsley wrote: Firstly, I am very much looking forward to the next generation j2cl compiler for GWT and think the new compiler vision is great. That said, I think the community would benefit greatly with the steering committee placing a higher priority on closing out on the 2.8 release. I know that the current 2.8 is considered usable for production but 2.8 isn't feature complete and organizations can be very hesitant to use non-GA versions of libraries. In particular it would be a big win to have a done version of JsInterop v1 and clear guidance on using the current version of elemental. I, and I'm sure the rest of the GWT community, would greatly appreciate a clearer view on current release expectations and prioritization; is there anything you guys can share on that front? Again, really appreciate the recent work and love the plans for GWT 3.0. Cheers, James -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-we...@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- Nagin Kothari Co-founder, Zilicus Solutions www.zilicus.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: GWT native to long conversion
instead of
Long id = new Long(idStr);
try
Long id = Long.parseLong(idStr);
On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 3:37 AM, Alberto Mancini ab.manc...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello,
in your example you are returning id (a numeric value) as a string ant
this is the origin of the unexpected behavior.
Indeed this works
public final native String _getIdString()/*-{ return ''+this.id; }-*/;
as well as returning a java numeric value:
public final native int _getIdInt()/*-{ return this.id; }-*/;
(see
http://www.gwtproject.org/doc/latest/DevGuideCodingBasicsJSNI.html#passing-javascript
for details)
Anyway, in general, is probably not a good idea to use Long for a numeric
'native' value
because in js you cannot represent a long number (see f.e.
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/17320706/javascript-long-integer).
Hope it helps.
Alberto.
On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 3:38 PM Nikolay Prokofiev nprokof...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi.
I'm trying to convert js native number to GWT Long and send it over
gwt-rpc. But I got very weird results..
public class gwtbugEntryPoint implements EntryPoint {
@Override
public void onModuleLoad() {
String data = {\type\:\upd\, \id\:123};
ServerEvent serverEvent = JsonUtils.ServerEventsafeEval(data);
RootPanel.get().add(new HTML(GWT id=+serverEvent.getId()));
}
}class ServerEvent extends JavaScriptObject {
protected ServerEvent() {
}
public final native String getType()/*-{ return this.type; }-*/;
public final Long getId(){
String idStr = _getId();
GWT.log(idSTr: + idStr);
Long id = new Long(idStr);
GWT.log(id:+id);
return id;}
public final native String _getId()/*-{ return this.id; }-*/;}
console output:
idSTr:123
id:0
Can anyone explain me, how that could happen?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
Nagin Kothari
Co-founder,
Zilicus Solutions
www.zilicus.com
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: GWT release prioritization
+1 On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 7:29 PM, Michael Joyner mich...@newsrx.com wrote: +1 to the +1 On 07/31/2015 09:24 AM, Ed wrote: +1 organizations can be very hesitant to use non-GA versions of libraries. In particular it would be a big win to have a done version of JsInterop v1 and clear guidance on using the current version of elemental. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- Nagin Kothari Co-founder, Zilicus Solutions www.zilicus.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: How to deal with large multi-module applications on GWT
I On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 4:32 AM, Victor Krausser victor.kraus...@gmail.com wrote: Hello Jens! Well, today we have more than 250K java lines of client code divided in around 50 modules compiled in 4 permutations (2 browsers and 2 languages). I would say that full clean-build, let's say for a release or in continuous integration, could actually take up to 30 min and would not be a problem. But I can not let this grow indefinitely in memory, it would be a problem even for a server. Today I had to increase again maxHeapSize of the build as it surpassed 3GB. All our developers have new core i7 machines with 8gb of RAM. For dev we are working with strategies as commenting out groups of modules that we are not working on to improve compile time and memory consumption. What we need is to structure better our projects to *decrease the memory footprint for dev and CI environment and compile time for dev*. We plan on increasing a lot our code base and with the current structure it will really soon become unsustainable. Em quinta-feira, 11 de junho de 2015 19:32:59 UTC-3, Jens escreveu: AFAICT the amount of GWT modules shouldn't noticeably influence the compilation time. What increases compilation time is lines of code obviously, the amount of permutations that need to be compiled (for example I18n can produce lots of permutations), wether or not you use more than one worker during compilation (parameter -localWorkers) and finally outdated CPUs and RAM shortage (GWT developers should have decent machines to work with, not that 5 year old 3GB Windows 7 notebook). So for production builds or test builds you probably don't care about the compile time as these builds are done on build servers anyways. For the occasional development compiles you can decrease compilation time by limiting permutations to a single one and skip most optimizations by using the -draftCompile parameter. How many lines of client side GWT code does your app have and how many permutations do you produce? A compile time of 8-12 minutes doesn't sound too unreasonable if the app is already large or has lots of permutations. -- J. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. I do not know whether the link below can help you to solve your problem, but you can just go through it http://www.slideshare.net/RobertKeane1/turducken-divide-and-conquer-large-gwt-apps-with-multiple-teams -Nagin -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: ACE Editor for GWT
the link does not lead to ace editor On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 10:59 PM, Alain jazzmatad...@gmail.com wrote: Hello Folks, We just open sourced the GWT wrapper for the awesome ace editor. If you are looking for a high performance web base editor for your enterprise java web projects this can be for you ! We hope it helps you like it does help us. Find more info here http://opensource.ahome-it.com/#ahome-ace Cheers. Alain -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- Nagin Kothari Co-founder, Zilicus Solutions www.zilicus.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: Development Mode will not be supported in Firefox 27+
I do not know what Jetty problem Jörg is talking about. I am using GWT 2.6 with FF 26 and I am able to use DevMode. On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 6:21 AM, joerg.hohwil...@googlemail.com joerg.hohwil...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi there, I can understand that it is a hard task to maintain the GWT and especially DevMode with its plugins. However, the hole thing about GWT is that you can do pure Java and use the Java tooling. Developers know how to work with Eclipse. And within the Eclipse debugger you can evaluate deeply into variables and objects, add conditional breakpoints, exception breakpoints, dynamically evaluate expressions, have step filters, drop to frame, etc., etc. I am a power user and going to SDM with chrome debugger is simply no alternative and will IMHO never be. With GWT 2.6.0 DevMode even stopped working due to Jetty problems so I can not even use it with older FF versions. This is a real pain for me. I am wondering if I wasted the last years building on GWT all nights ( https://github.com/m-m-m/mmm/tree/master/mmm-client/mmm-client-ui/mmm-client-ui-widget/mmm-client-ui-widget-impl-web-gwt). Then I could also assimilate with JS hell and go for AngularJS. Sorry for being so negative but I am really frustrated. Thanks for all your support on GWT (2.6.0 brings J1.7 syntax support, etc. what is really cool) and your will to improve it in the future. Maybe you can change my mind one fine day and bring me back... Regards Jörg Am Donnerstag, 20. Februar 2014 11:57:30 UTC+1 schrieb Thomas Broyer: On Thursday, February 20, 2014 9:49:42 AM UTC+1, m...@touk.pl wrote: Couldn't agree more... debugging the client-side GWT code in the IDE debugger (Eclipse in my case) is base of my every day work :( I'm sure the SDBG devs would love to hear your feedback ;-) https://github.com/sdbg/sdbg -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- Nagin Kothari Co-founder, Zilicus Solutions www.zilicus.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: Using Object in classes passed via GWT RPC
change field - ListLocalizedMessage errors to ArrayListLocalizedMessage errors and see whether it works On Sat, Nov 9, 2013 at 11:46 PM, James Clough cloug...@gmail.com wrote: Cargo cult programming, born of desperation. I have another class that is working correctly with a field of type Object, so I was analyzing it and trying to eliminate each difference as a possible cause. The other class happens to pitch to the zero-argument Object constructor, so I added it to this class as well. It didn't help, of course. On Saturday, November 9, 2013 10:49:20 AM UTC-7, Patrick Tucker wrote: Why do you have super() in you constructor? Your class does not extend anything. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- Nagin Kothari Co-founder, Zilicus Solutions www.zilicus.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: Error in superdev mode
SuperDev Code server create cache.js and .rpc file in temp folder of system under folder name like this gwt-codeserver-7917955539027953667.tmp. I see that rpc file generated in this folder is different than what is complied by GWT compiler in war folder of project(which is used by GWT's inbuilt JETTY server). This could be reason for this error. But I am not able to understand why this difference and what should be done to avoid this. On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 6:49 PM, jaga j.annes...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, There is an option in eclipse for automatic building. If you turn this off you may solve your problem. The problem is that the files used by the superdev mode are becoming out of date. This happens every time you are changing code in eclipse. Changing the code will trigger the build and hence the files you previously copied to the superdev server are becoming out of date. These are the RPC files Thomas talked about. Solution: to restart superdev after every build. You will have to trigger a build. It might only be a problem when you are changing the server side files. Ja -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- Nagin Kothari Co-founder, Zilicus Solutions www.zilicus.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: Error in superdev mode
Strange thing I observed is - Some screens/pages are working well in suerdev mode while some throws serialization error. I have 5 RPC services(Remote services). Out of this fine for one remote service .rpc file generated in dev mode is named differently than .rpc file generated by superdev mode. Screens/pages using this service is throwing error. while other screens using other four remote services are working well. Can anybody (Thomas ? )suggest what could be reason for strange behavior. Thanks On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Nagin Kothari naginkoth...@gmail.comwrote: SuperDev Code server create cache.js and .rpc file in temp folder of system under folder name like this gwt-codeserver-7917955539027953667.tmp. I see that rpc file generated in this folder is different than what is complied by GWT compiler in war folder of project(which is used by GWT's inbuilt JETTY server). This could be reason for this error. But I am not able to understand why this difference and what should be done to avoid this. On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 6:49 PM, jaga j.annes...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, There is an option in eclipse for automatic building. If you turn this off you may solve your problem. The problem is that the files used by the superdev mode are becoming out of date. This happens every time you are changing code in eclipse. Changing the code will trigger the build and hence the files you previously copied to the superdev server are becoming out of date. These are the RPC files Thomas talked about. Solution: to restart superdev after every build. You will have to trigger a build. It might only be a problem when you are changing the server side files. Ja -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- Nagin Kothari Co-founder, Zilicus Solutions www.zilicus.com -- Nagin Kothari Co-founder, Zilicus Solutions www.zilicus.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: Error in superdev mode
Thanks Jaga for your responses. Yes, I tried as what you said. But I still see same result. On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 7:51 PM, jaga j.annes...@gmail.com wrote: So until 2.6 you are going to have work around it. Have you tried what I suggested? Stopping and starting the gwt superdev code server? This will create a new temp folder and copy 'static' files over. At the moment this will include RPC files. Perhaps the reason some work and some dont is that only some are being recompiled. Eclipse will automatically build the project when there has been a change. It will update the jetty war files as part of that process. Jaga -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- Nagin Kothari Co-founder, Zilicus Solutions www.zilicus.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Error in superdev mode
My GWT application complied in 2.5.1 works well. But when I run this application in SuperDev mode. , it shows me error was not assignable to 'com.google.gwt.user.client.rpc.IsSerializable' and did not have a custom field serializer. . I have verified that all java classes implement Serializable . Every thing works great in DEV mode and in compiled mode. But nothing works in SUPERDEV mode because of this error. I am not able figure out what is cause of this error. Can anybody please hep me ? My GWT version is 2.5.1. Chrome version is 30.0.1599.69 m Thanks in advance Nagin Kothari -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: Error in superdev mode
I am not using external server for superdev mode. I am using GWT's inbuilt Jetty server. I was working earlier with chrome 27 On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote: AFAICT, you have to copy the gwt.rpc file(s) generated by SuperDevMode to your server, or make it so that your server will load the serialization policies from the SuperdevMode server. GWT 2.6 will make the later easier: see https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/2341 and https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/2360 (note: they're marked abandoned but have actually been merged; they're from a time where changes had to be committed to Google's internal Perforce repo, which was then replicated to the SVN and then to Git) On Friday, October 18, 2013 11:00:32 AM UTC+2, NK wrote: My GWT application complied in 2.5.1 works well. But when I run this application in SuperDev mode. , it shows me error was not assignable to 'com.google.gwt.user.client.**rpc.IsSerializable' and did not have a custom field serializer. . I have verified that all java classes implement Serializable . Every thing works great in DEV mode and in compiled mode. But nothing works in SUPERDEV mode because of this error. I am not able figure out what is cause of this error. Can anybody please hep me ? My GWT version is 2.5.1. Chrome version is 30.0.1599.69 m Thanks in advance Nagin Kothari -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- Nagin Kothari Co-founder, Zilicus Solutions www.zilicus.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: Error in superdev mode
I am stuck on SuperDev mode. Does any body any idea what is solution for this to work? On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 3:24 PM, Nagin Kothari naginkoth...@gmail.comwrote: I am not using external server for superdev mode. I am using GWT's inbuilt Jetty server. I was working earlier with chrome 27 On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote: AFAICT, you have to copy the gwt.rpc file(s) generated by SuperDevMode to your server, or make it so that your server will load the serialization policies from the SuperdevMode server. GWT 2.6 will make the later easier: see https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/2341 and https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/2360 (note: they're marked abandoned but have actually been merged; they're from a time where changes had to be committed to Google's internal Perforce repo, which was then replicated to the SVN and then to Git) On Friday, October 18, 2013 11:00:32 AM UTC+2, NK wrote: My GWT application complied in 2.5.1 works well. But when I run this application in SuperDev mode. , it shows me error was not assignable to 'com.google.gwt.user.client.**rpc.IsSerializable' and did not have a custom field serializer. . I have verified that all java classes implement Serializable . Every thing works great in DEV mode and in compiled mode. But nothing works in SUPERDEV mode because of this error. I am not able figure out what is cause of this error. Can anybody please hep me ? My GWT version is 2.5.1. Chrome version is 30.0.1599.69 m Thanks in advance Nagin Kothari -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- Nagin Kothari Co-founder, Zilicus Solutions www.zilicus.com -- Nagin Kothari Co-founder, Zilicus Solutions www.zilicus.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: Call for action: Time to rethink a road-map and more frequent updates for GWT.
GWT is the very good framework which gives you flexibility to use their in-built widgets or functionality as well allow to work on low level API or customize framework to your need like compiler linker etc. My company does 100% in GWT and Java. Using only one standard language for both server and client that works on all browsers is brilliant and unique. -Nagin kothari www.zilicus.com On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 1:57 AM, Erron erron.aus...@gmail.com wrote: +1 GWT is too complicated. I think even for experts in GWT and/or Java you would have to admit that GWT is quite verbose which turns off alot of JS developers. From what I have seen, Dart looks to be the evolution of GWT. But it still has a longs way to go to be as mature as GWT. On Sunday, April 15, 2012 5:03:07 AM UTC-4, Joshua Kappon wrote: I personally believe that someone at Google decided GWT is too complicated for web developers out there and has failed the test of getting traction (I know a lot of people are using it, but I think they were aiming for a number similar to the JS community). I personally think that Dart is out there only as an attempt to pull more Java Scripters in, because they feel GWT failed to do that. Dart runs natively on chrome, but also compiles to JS (just like GWT) - so it can support all modern browsers. I started this thread because I feel there are a lot of GWT developers who really want to hear Google's thoughts about GWT in the future. I also feel that in this last year, people are discovering it and thinking about adopting more than before, but they are driven away by Google's official silence (Personally, I know of 3 companies who decided it is a risk, and chose BackBone.JS instead) Don't get me wrong, I am thankful to the contributors community, but I think Google should say something as Google about this. On Sunday, April 15, 2012 11:39:47 AM UTC+3, dominikz wrote: I actually think that the whole mess with Dart is actually to develop a single platform for both Google products: Android and Chrome. Imagine that in a couple of years you could write in the same language both native (to Android) and browser applications. Wouldn't it make be great? Of course from Google perspective, if they are only thinking about promoting their own products (Android), because they surely don't care about Windows Phone or iPhone. In my opinion they are going a way to encourage to use their products and discourage to use other's. Imagine you have (through Dart) a very easy way of developing native application, or close to native with a web language (Dart). Of course those would only have 'native' LF for Android and Chrome. For all the other browsers they will put some sort of 'compatibility layer' (javascript) that will not have all those cool features (animations, etc.). If the developers catch this idea, people will tend to use Chrome and Android more, because of a better experience. What do you think about that theory? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/9jcRLdMkjmkJ. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- Nagin Kothari Co-founder, Zilicus Solutions www.zilicus.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: GWT 2.5 and beyond
I , too second that regard Nagin On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 12:00 AM, Handw vere...@gmail.com wrote: That's amazing! On Saturday, March 31, 2012 10:07:49 AM UTC-4, Thomas Broyer wrote: On Saturday, March 31, 2012 4:00:56 PM UTC+2, supercobra wrote: The GWT PR machine has been offline for a year now. As it seems, the GWT engineers have been either working hard on a big and long project that is going to blow our socks off and hopefully they'll unveil it at Google IO 2012 or Google is winding down the project which would be a huge pity. The event that got me worried a lot is when their developer relation engineer David Chandler was moved to another group. David's blog: http://turbomanage.**wordpress.com/http://turbomanage.wordpress.com/category/google-web-toolkit/ So far I have not heard of the name of his replacement. Google should we worry or get excited? Let's get excited: https://plus.google.com/u/0/** 110412141990454266397/posts/**Nvr6Se6eAPhhttps://plus.google.com/u/0/110412141990454266397/posts/Nvr6Se6eAPh! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/cuR_RxRhTaIJ. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: Call for action: Time to rethink a road-map and more frequent updates for GWT.
++1 On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 7:58 PM, Jmscavaleiro jmscavale...@gmail.comwrote: +1 On Apr 2, 4:19 pm, Joshua Kappon shuky.kap...@gmail.com wrote: With the rise of the new developers.google.com, and with Google trying to rally up developers using Google technologies and products, and the rise of Dart and unclear future of GWT, I think it's about time that Google will rethink the all We don't and won't have a road map, and there are no release dates for new GWT versions and embrace the GWT developers community. What do you guys think? (if you agree, +1 this) Best, Josh -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Issue with Custom exception in Production mode
I have defined custom exception extending from Exception class. On server I throws this custom exception with some message. My RPC call also has this exception as part of service call signature. In development mode when I show this message in onFailaure() method of RPC call on client, I see proper message. But in production (after compilation) , on client I see 500 error instead of message. Any idea could be the reason and how to resolve this? Thanks , Nagin kothari -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: future of gwt who use gwt
Dart is yet very very young.. .I think it will take more than two years to gain popularity and acceptance(if at all?), also all browser vendors (like Microsoft) acceptance. So why worry right now about Dart? Any way new client side technologies keep coming every year. If at all Dart gains popularity in future,I think Google would provide tool to convert your GWT (java) code to Dart. -Nagin On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 11:55 PM, Tomasz Gawel tomaszga...@op.pl wrote: hi thomas, thanks for link to infoq article about dart - so... it seems my guess is possibly right :) - but it's long long way ahead. as to mentioned issue with hashmap - i find it feature rather than problem. and that case is even not java-javascript but ie specific implementation issue. and as to gwt - since this is gwt group - i liked very much the idea of cross-compilation and possibility of maintaining big client side application in java. although it was gwt where i came across it the first time. but than i was not sure about it should try to mimic common java libraries. maybe sticking only to java raw language but with browser specific libriries would be a better solution? libraries that vastly utilize something like JavaScriptObject class in current implementation? maybe the wrong business policy was to target with gwt at existing java developers rather than motivate existing javascript developers to learn java :)? but no tool is perfect - especially from its begining - and imporovements are natural (notice java collections). gwt is still young, and java at its age was imho less convincing technology. if it is not due any legal/licensing strategy than i would stick to java in gwt... if i were gooogle ;). as to mysql - nice to see it on app engine - but this fact does not undermine the possibility of willingness to became independent from oracle owned technology. since mysql community server is open source and GPL licensed, google is no way dependent on oracle in that case. situation with java is quite different, and as i remember some time ago microsoft tried to make its own java, what has been effectively stopped by sun's sue and trial, utlimately resulting in birth of c# :). -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: Reflection Class Generator
Great!! -Nagin On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 7:05 PM, Honza Rames rame...@gmail.com wrote: OK, I'm making some preparations to release it on Google Code. I'll post all the info there (I mean what it can and cannot do and why some things are little bit different from java reflection API). Hopefully I'll manage to do this during the weekend... -- Honza Rames On 2 čvn, 13:07, Nagin Kothari naginkoth...@gmail.com wrote: I am very interessed on it. May you send the project to do a look to the code? regards Nagin Kothari On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 8:10 PM, Honza Rames rame...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, from what I can tell GWT doesn't support reflection at all in client side (JS translatable) code. Just a few simple features like getting class name (but I can't really call that reflection can I ;-) ). I have been experimenting with reflection in client side code though, and with a lot of success I must say :-). I'm planning to share the code on Google Code when I feel its ready, I'm currently testing it on business application I'm working on and then we'll see. If you (or anybody else) would like to give it a try, I might be able to create some package and share this with you (or maybe create the Google Code project right away). There is similar framework (don't remember the name but can be found by Google ;-) ), which didn't really didn't do the job for me because it was pretty difficult to generate the reflection information that is needed (please correct me if I got that wrong). My approach uses GWT generators and annotations to specify which packages and which classes should participate in reflection information generation. I'm supporting similar functionality that java Class gives you with some modifications, but you can obtain annotations, get/set fields and even call public methods and create new instance in reflective way (but you need to be careful on what info you add because it could greatly enlarge your resulting JS code). I also have unit tests (of course) for bunch of stuff but it would require a lot of cleanup I guess. So if anyone is interested just leave a message ;-) -- Honza Rames On 31 kvě, 16:20, Adolfo Panizo Touzon adolfo.pan...@gmail.com wrote: Can somebody the function about de class Generator and all the similar classes which is contained int he packpage com.google.gwt.core.ext, it´s used for deferred binding? Maybe if I want use reflection in my app, I must use these classes?? -- El precio es lo que pagas. El valor es lo que recibes. Warren Buffet -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: Reflection Class Generator
I am very interessed on it. May you send the project to do a look to the code? regards Nagin Kothari On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 8:10 PM, Honza Rames rame...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, from what I can tell GWT doesn't support reflection at all in client side (JS translatable) code. Just a few simple features like getting class name (but I can't really call that reflection can I ;-) ). I have been experimenting with reflection in client side code though, and with a lot of success I must say :-). I'm planning to share the code on Google Code when I feel its ready, I'm currently testing it on business application I'm working on and then we'll see. If you (or anybody else) would like to give it a try, I might be able to create some package and share this with you (or maybe create the Google Code project right away). There is similar framework (don't remember the name but can be found by Google ;-) ), which didn't really didn't do the job for me because it was pretty difficult to generate the reflection information that is needed (please correct me if I got that wrong). My approach uses GWT generators and annotations to specify which packages and which classes should participate in reflection information generation. I'm supporting similar functionality that java Class gives you with some modifications, but you can obtain annotations, get/set fields and even call public methods and create new instance in reflective way (but you need to be careful on what info you add because it could greatly enlarge your resulting JS code). I also have unit tests (of course) for bunch of stuff but it would require a lot of cleanup I guess. So if anyone is interested just leave a message ;-) -- Honza Rames On 31 kvě, 16:20, Adolfo Panizo Touzon adolfo.pan...@gmail.com wrote: Can somebody the function about de class Generator and all the similar classes which is contained int he packpage com.google.gwt.core.ext, it´s used for deferred binding? Maybe if I want use reflection in my app, I must use these classes?? -- El precio es lo que pagas. El valor es lo que recibes. Warren Buffet -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: GWT 2.2 Canvas support for IE6 (GWTCanvasImplIE6)
gwt-graphics is very simple to use and very good. But one more down side, there is now no new development in the project and support seems to have been withdrawn. I have reported Issue related to IE behavior six month back, but it has not been looked into.Same thing with other issues that are reported in this project. regards, Nagin Kothari On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 10:35 AM, Craig Mitchell craig...@gmail.com wrote: Just tried out gwt-graphics, very impressive. One downside is that the Path vector object only supports ints, and not doubles, so when I hooked it up to GChart, my charts looked a little wobbly. On Mar 3, 5:17 pm, Jan Mostert j...@mycee.com wrote: GWT-graphics supports IE6 via VML and renders everything else via Vector Supported browsers The library has been tested to work with the following browsers: - Internet Explorer 6 and newer - Firefox 3.0 and newer - Safari 3.2 and newer - Opera 9.6 and newer - Google Chrome http://code.google.com/p/gwt-graphics/ -- Jan Vladimir Mostert BEngSci MyCee Technologies On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 1:58 AM, Craig Mitchell craig...@gmail.com wrote: +1. Partial support would be great as there are a lot of IE 6/7/8 users out there. http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_explorer.asp On Mar 3, 1:22 am, Kurtt Lin kurtt@gmail.com wrote: Even partially supporting is welcomed, and developers should have known about its IE6's poor performance, thus avoid rendering lots elements. Actually i want Canvas in IE 6/7/8 badly. T T On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 9:55 PM, Philip Rogers p...@google.com wrote: Because of the difficulty of supporting IE6 fully via VML (including text, etc.) and still having reasonable performance, there aren't plans to support it at this time. The new Canvas implementation in GWT should have complete support across FF3.5, Chrome, Safari, and IE9, but there isn't a fallback provided for the older browsers. On Mar 1, 10:31 pm, Craig Mitchell craig...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Are there any plans for Canvas to support IE6? It was supported via GWTCanvasImplIE6 in the gwt-incubator.jar which would implement the Canvas functionality via VML. Thanks. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: To smart GWT or not
Sanjiv, I know I am reopening this thread, not to criticise Smart GWT, but want to give some feedback. First of all let me acknowledge that it is very good library with lot of cool and fantastic features. I experimented with it and liked it and planning to use it in one of my project.But I have some doubts and questions , which you I thought you will be best person to answer . Hence this mail. 1. I am using GWT and want to use some Smart GWT widgets in that application.But it looks like I have to include lot of Smart client JS file which size is about 2MB. Client need to download all these JS libs above our GWT compiled script. this become very huge download for client, Even I want to use Smart GWT's grid , I realized that I have to include almost everything except few small smart-client JS.So my question is why is so and what is work around for it? 2.Second, smart-client scripts are not in compressed format (like GWT is). it is like GWT pretty format. If it is compressed then size of all script files will be reduced. 3. My third question is - Why smart GWT is not written in GWT so that it can take advantage of GWT's optimised java script compiler.Smart GWT widget the can be extended by user to customize it. Right now Smart GWT widgets are just black box for developer. Theses are few question I had in mind., Over all features provided by smart GWT are great. Thank and regards, Nagin Kothari On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 9:24 PM, Sanjiv Jivan sanjiv.ji...@gmail.com wrote: Jaroslav, If you're happy with GWT that’s great but please do not make such vague and baseless claims about Smart GWT. Legitimate bugs reported are fixed really quickly and existing users can attest to this. Smart GWT currently has around 42 open defects with a majority of them being low priority, and 16 enhancement requests ( http://code.google.com/p/smartgwt/issues/list ). Considering the depth and breadth of features provided by the framework this is a pretty low number of defects. 3 of the 7 issues that you filed were invalid, and 2 defects that were fixed and the remaining 2 were marked WontFix since they were trivial pieces of functionality that the user could easily implement. http://code.google.com/p/smartgwt/issues/list?can=1q=reporter:jaroslav.zaruba http://code.google.com/p/smartgwt/issues/list?can=1q=reporter:jaroslav.zarubaAnd when you were advised how to implement a warning dialog before record deletion on this issue that you filed ( http://code.google.com/p/smartgwt/issues/detail?id=325 ), you responded by you are sad. Nice way to show your appreciation when using a free product. Sanjiv 2010/12/3 Jaroslav Záruba jaroslav.zar...@gmail.com ...until you run into some SmartGWT magic - like widgets not working without otherwise completely useless 'final' (have fun trying figure that out), newly spanned records not appearing in tree, styles not getting applied until mouseover, etc. What looks like polished set of awesome widgets might turn into nightmare which makes you throwing your deadlines out of the window. (Like I said before, this particular experience with SmartGWT is one year old.) With GWT the start might be slower but you can predict the deadlines + you're not working with 'black box'. On 3 pro, 00:00, ckendrick charles.kendr...@gmail.com wrote: Sorry that's quite absurd: SmartGWT is often introduced to solve performance problems, and it solves them. SmartGWT is intentionally designed to have a one-time-ever download of a feature rich runtime in exchange for reducing subsequent server requests. For example, Adaptive Filtering greatly reduces the costliest types of database hits: http://www.smartclient.com/smartgwt/showcase/#grid_adaptive_filter_fe... .. and allows you to introduce an extremely powerful data highlighting system with no server load at all: http://blog.isomorphic.com/?p=234 If your application is the kind we target - complex enterprise applications which are used repeatedly and for significant lengths of time - this provides a gigantic performance boost, and once-ever download of cachable JavaScript files is a negligible factor. Look at a deployed SmartGWT application and you've got users humming along, ripping through the interface and nothing being downloaded anymore because it's all cached. And everyone is getting fast responses from the database because the Smart GWT framework is minimizing database load. The larger your application becomes, the more these benefits accrue. And, by the time you've built an application with comparable functionality with core GWT or another GWT-based framework, you're going to be downloading the same size runtime as SmartGWT anyway. On Dec 1, 1:44 pm, aarnott andrew.wj.arn...@gmail.com wrote: I've found Smart GWT to have rather poor performance and it comes at the added cost of massive javascript libraries (even when
Re: GWT with Hibernate and Oracle
Thanks a lot Néstor regards, Nagin 2011/1/27 Néstor Boscán nesto...@gmail.com I found this one on the web: http://maherkilani.blogspot.com/2008/12/hibernate-proxy-cleaner.html Regards, Néstor Boscán On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 2:15 AM, Nagin Kothari naginkoth...@gmail.comwrote: Hi, Can you point to some link that provide sample code or utility to clean the Hibernate POJO (Hibernate Cleaner class) as you have mentioned in this mail. It would greately help me too. Thanks in advance, Nagin 2011/1/26 Néstor Boscán nesto...@gmail.com This is very tipical in Hibernate applications that have to serialize objects through the network be it GWT, Web Services, JSON, etc. Hibernate will leave his own POJO in your objects for lazy initialization purposes. When GWT or a Web Service tries to serialize the objects and opens the hibernate POJO it will throw LazyInitializationException because the connection is already closed. What I've done in my applications is to clean the POJO of any Hibernate references. This is done with a Hibernate Cleaner class. On the web there are a couple of examples of this. Regards, Néstor Boscán On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 2:33 PM, Debashish mr.debash...@gmail.comwrote: Hi I am trying for a sample using GWT and database layer as Hibernate with Oracle on Google Aps server. I have done a sample for Hibernate with JSP as presentation layer, which is working fine. But the same approach is not working with GWT. Here is a verygood link on this topic http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/articles/using_gwt_with_hibernate.html and my approach is almost similar. I have followed the below approach, The RemoteServiceServlet makes a call to Hibernate layer and tries the initializes the SessionFactory as below, sessionFactory = new Configuration().configure().buildSessionFactory(); I have added the jars necessary for the Hibernate layer (and classes12.jar for oracle driver). However while running , it is giving me an error as below, Initial SessionFactory creation failed.java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: java.net.Socket is a restricted class. Please see the Google App Engine developer's guide for more details. [ERROR] javax.servlet.ServletContext log: Exception while dispatching incoming RPC call com.google.gwt.user.server.rpc.UnexpectedException: Service method 'public abstract java.lang.Long com.google.musicstore.client.MusicStoreService.saveAccount(com.google.musicstore.client.dto.AccountDTO)' threw an unexpected exception: java.lang.ExceptionInInitializerError at com.google.gwt.user.server.rpc.RPC.encodeResponseForFailure(RPC.java: 378) I have one through some of the threads which suggested me to download the google apps jar files and try it. I have downladed it. but there is no proper direction on how to make use of which jar file. Have anybody tried the same. Please let me know if anything I am doing wrong. *** Note that I am using Oracle 9.2 as local database. Thanks Dev -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-web-toolkit%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com . To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-web-toolkit%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-web-toolkit%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-web-toolkit%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- You received this message because you
Re: GWT with Hibernate and Oracle
Hi, Can you point to some link that provide sample code or utility to clean the Hibernate POJO (Hibernate Cleaner class) as you have mentioned in this mail. It would greately help me too. Thanks in advance, Nagin 2011/1/26 Néstor Boscán nesto...@gmail.com This is very tipical in Hibernate applications that have to serialize objects through the network be it GWT, Web Services, JSON, etc. Hibernate will leave his own POJO in your objects for lazy initialization purposes. When GWT or a Web Service tries to serialize the objects and opens the hibernate POJO it will throw LazyInitializationException because the connection is already closed. What I've done in my applications is to clean the POJO of any Hibernate references. This is done with a Hibernate Cleaner class. On the web there are a couple of examples of this. Regards, Néstor Boscán On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 2:33 PM, Debashish mr.debash...@gmail.com wrote: Hi I am trying for a sample using GWT and database layer as Hibernate with Oracle on Google Aps server. I have done a sample for Hibernate with JSP as presentation layer, which is working fine. But the same approach is not working with GWT. Here is a verygood link on this topic http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/articles/using_gwt_with_hibernate.html and my approach is almost similar. I have followed the below approach, The RemoteServiceServlet makes a call to Hibernate layer and tries the initializes the SessionFactory as below, sessionFactory = new Configuration().configure().buildSessionFactory(); I have added the jars necessary for the Hibernate layer (and classes12.jar for oracle driver). However while running , it is giving me an error as below, Initial SessionFactory creation failed.java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: java.net.Socket is a restricted class. Please see the Google App Engine developer's guide for more details. [ERROR] javax.servlet.ServletContext log: Exception while dispatching incoming RPC call com.google.gwt.user.server.rpc.UnexpectedException: Service method 'public abstract java.lang.Long com.google.musicstore.client.MusicStoreService.saveAccount(com.google.musicstore.client.dto.AccountDTO)' threw an unexpected exception: java.lang.ExceptionInInitializerError at com.google.gwt.user.server.rpc.RPC.encodeResponseForFailure(RPC.java: 378) I have one through some of the threads which suggested me to download the google apps jar files and try it. I have downladed it. but there is no proper direction on how to make use of which jar file. Have anybody tried the same. Please let me know if anything I am doing wrong. *** Note that I am using Oracle 9.2 as local database. Thanks Dev -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-web-toolkit%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-web-toolkit%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: i18n default locale fallback
Also GWT compiles for one more permutaion for default locale, which is unnecessary. Nagin kothari On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 3:52 PM, ep eplisc...@googlemail.com wrote: in 2.1.0 I have the problem that I define my locales like so: extend-property name=locale values=en,de/ set-property-fallback name=locale value=en/ so actually the 'default' locale is excluded and can never happen that would be used. I dont provide any key for the default locale, neither in my Constants nor in appropriate .properties file. In dev mode it works like expected but I cannot compile, because the generator says that no resource was found for the key, as it tries to generate a class for the default locale and expects either @DefaultText or default properties file. Has someone a workaround? Maybe a patch? issue: http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=5769 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comgoogle-web-toolkit%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
GWT 2.0 is unusable in IE7
I am developing Web application using GWT 2.0. I am using Layout panel which is added to RootLayout panel. In IE 7 when we open dialog box, popup panel, menu item or date picker or any thing that pop ups , then all widgets on the screen except popup disappears . when these pop ups are closed then everything reappears. This is very irritating to user and make application unusable . I had open issue #4532 a month back, but nobody from GWT team have attended or accepted and looked into it yet . It is very surprising that such critical issue is not been attended to. I hope that GWT team will look into it and try to resolve this earliest. thanks Nagin -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
