[gwt-contrib] Change in gwt[master]: Added missing compiler options to JUnitShell.
Roberto Lublinerman has uploaded a new patch set (#3). Change subject: Added missing compiler options to JUnitShell. .. Added missing compiler options to JUnitShell. Added JUnitShellTest to JUnitSuite. Change-Id: I5a4c3747bedaf5db84b0c7ffefdd83da64d060d7 Review-Link: https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/#/c/2611/ --- M user/src/com/google/gwt/junit/JUnitShell.java M user/test/com/google/gwt/junit/JUnitShellTest.java M user/test/com/google/gwt/junit/JUnitSuite.java 3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) -- To view, visit https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/2611 To unsubscribe, visit https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/settings Gerrit-MessageType: newpatchset Gerrit-Change-Id: I5a4c3747bedaf5db84b0c7ffefdd83da64d060d7 Gerrit-PatchSet: 3 Gerrit-Project: gwt Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Owner: Roberto Lublinerman rlu...@google.com Gerrit-Reviewer: John Stalcup stal...@google.com Gerrit-Reviewer: Matthew Dempsky mdemp...@google.com Gerrit-Reviewer: Matthew Dempsky mdemp...@gwtproject.org -- -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit Contributors group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
[gwt-contrib] Change in gwt[master]: Added missing compiler options to JUnitShell.
Matthew Dempsky has posted comments on this change. Change subject: Added missing compiler options to JUnitShell. .. Patch Set 2: Verified-1 Oops, this change failed the build and/or style presubmit. :( More details at http://gwt-ci.dempsky.org:8080/job/gwt.presubmit/39 -- To view, visit https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/2611 To unsubscribe, visit https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/settings Gerrit-MessageType: comment Gerrit-Change-Id: I5a4c3747bedaf5db84b0c7ffefdd83da64d060d7 Gerrit-PatchSet: 2 Gerrit-Project: gwt Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Owner: Roberto Lublinerman rlu...@google.com Gerrit-Reviewer: John Stalcup stal...@google.com Gerrit-Reviewer: Matthew Dempsky mdemp...@google.com Gerrit-Reviewer: Matthew Dempsky mdemp...@gwtproject.org Gerrit-HasComments: No -- -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit Contributors group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
[gwt-contrib] Change in gwt[master]: Added missing compiler options to JUnitShell.
Matthew Dempsky has posted comments on this change. Change subject: Added missing compiler options to JUnitShell. .. Patch Set 3: Verified-1 Oops, this change failed the build and/or style presubmit. :( More details at http://gwt-ci.dempsky.org:8080/job/gwt.presubmit/40 -- To view, visit https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/2611 To unsubscribe, visit https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/settings Gerrit-MessageType: comment Gerrit-Change-Id: I5a4c3747bedaf5db84b0c7ffefdd83da64d060d7 Gerrit-PatchSet: 3 Gerrit-Project: gwt Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Owner: Roberto Lublinerman rlu...@google.com Gerrit-Reviewer: John Stalcup stal...@google.com Gerrit-Reviewer: Matthew Dempsky mdemp...@google.com Gerrit-Reviewer: Matthew Dempsky mdemp...@gwtproject.org Gerrit-HasComments: No -- -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit Contributors group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
[gwt-contrib] Change in gwt[master]: Added missing compiler options to JUnitShell.
Roberto Lublinerman has abandoned this change. Change subject: Added missing compiler options to JUnitShell. .. Abandoned Submitted, thanks!!! -- To view, visit https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/2611 To unsubscribe, visit https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/settings Gerrit-MessageType: abandon Gerrit-Change-Id: I5a4c3747bedaf5db84b0c7ffefdd83da64d060d7 Gerrit-PatchSet: 3 Gerrit-Project: gwt Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Owner: Roberto Lublinerman rlu...@google.com Gerrit-Reviewer: John Stalcup stal...@google.com Gerrit-Reviewer: Matthew Dempsky mdemp...@google.com Gerrit-Reviewer: Matthew Dempsky mdemp...@gwtproject.org -- -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit Contributors group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
[gwt-contrib] Change in gwt[master]: Added missing compiler options to JUnitShell.
Goktug Gokdogan has posted comments on this change. Change subject: Added missing compiler options to JUnitShell. .. Patch Set 3: (3 comments) Woaw so fast! You guys should leave it here for a while so that other people can have time to comment on it :) File user/test/com/google/gwt/junit/JUnitSuite.java Line 45: suite.addTestSuite(BatchingStrategyTest.class); Missing RunStyleSeleniumTest Line 47: Missing FakeCssMakerTest Line 49: suite.addTestSuite(GWTMockUtilitiesTest.class); Please move next Junitshelltest -- To view, visit https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/2611 To unsubscribe, visit https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/settings Gerrit-MessageType: comment Gerrit-Change-Id: I5a4c3747bedaf5db84b0c7ffefdd83da64d060d7 Gerrit-PatchSet: 3 Gerrit-Project: gwt Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Owner: Roberto Lublinerman rlu...@google.com Gerrit-Reviewer: Goktug Gokdogan gok...@google.com Gerrit-Reviewer: John Stalcup stal...@google.com Gerrit-Reviewer: Matthew Dempsky mdemp...@google.com Gerrit-Reviewer: Matthew Dempsky mdemp...@gwtproject.org Gerrit-HasComments: Yes -- -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit Contributors group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: SuperDevMode Compiler Options
Filed an issue reporthttp://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=7714 . I will keep this post updated on any changes regarding the issue. Oliver -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/yAG8379T3dwJ. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: SuperDevMode Compiler Options
does someone know if the issue with old jsp-compiler (which doesnt support generics...) is resolved ? thanx On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 7:34 AM, Brian Slesinsky skybr...@google.comwrote: On Tuesday, August 21, 2012 1:25:43 AM UTC-7, Thomas Broyer wrote: On Monday, August 20, 2012 3:35:06 PM UTC+2, Oliver Krylow wrote: Hi! Is there a way to pass arguments to the compiler the CodeServer uses? No. Well, actually you could provided that you're willing to edit some source code and rebuild gwt-codeserver.jar from source. Here is the relevant file: http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/browse/trunk/dev/codeserver/java/com/google/gwt/dev/codeserver/CompilerOptionsImpl.java It shouldn't be too hard to write a patch to expose some flags. I started out with a minimal set of flags, not knowing which flags people would want and wanting to keep things simple. I am interested in passing the -strict flag for example. Please file an issue. There could also be a -logLevel argument (and a better UI, possibly integrated with the GPE, among other improvements) I'm unlikely to get to it soon, but I think it would be nice to expose the ability to change compiler options from within the browser before doing a recompile. - Brian -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/LUuVUce3lCoJ. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: SuperDevMode Compiler Options
On Tuesday, August 21, 2012 1:25:43 AM UTC-7, Thomas Broyer wrote: On Monday, August 20, 2012 3:35:06 PM UTC+2, Oliver Krylow wrote: Hi! Is there a way to pass arguments to the compiler the CodeServer uses? No. Well, actually you could provided that you're willing to edit some source code and rebuild gwt-codeserver.jar from source. Here is the relevant file: http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/browse/trunk/dev/codeserver/java/com/google/gwt/dev/codeserver/CompilerOptionsImpl.java It shouldn't be too hard to write a patch to expose some flags. I started out with a minimal set of flags, not knowing which flags people would want and wanting to keep things simple. I am interested in passing the -strict flag for example. Please file an issue. There could also be a -logLevel argument (and a better UI, possibly integrated with the GPE, among other improvements) I'm unlikely to get to it soon, but I think it would be nice to expose the ability to change compiler options from within the browser before doing a recompile. - Brian -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/LUuVUce3lCoJ. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: SuperDevMode Compiler Options
On Monday, August 20, 2012 3:35:06 PM UTC+2, Oliver Krylow wrote: Hi! Is there a way to pass arguments to the compiler the CodeServer uses? No. I am interested in passing the -strict flag for example. Please file an issue. There could also be a -logLevel argument (and a better UI, possibly integrated with the GPE, among other improvements) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/oxvJ3VPj72YJ. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
SuperDevMode Compiler Options
Hi! Is there a way to pass arguments to the compiler the CodeServer uses? I am interested in passing the -strict flag for example. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/Z7uRIyWgoVQJ. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Custom compiler options with the gwt maven plugin
Hi, with the release GWT 2.5.0 RC1 release, I ran into the issue that I cannot add a custom gwt compiler parameter in my pom. At least I cannot find any documentation showing how to do it. I would like to turn on the experimental closure compiler. Am I missing something? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/tDbcrT7X3UwJ. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: Custom compiler options with the gwt maven plugin
On Thursday, June 28, 2012 11:40:07 AM UTC+2, P.G.Taboada wrote: Hi, with the release GWT 2.5.0 RC1 release, I ran into the issue that I cannot add a custom gwt compiler parameter in my pom. At least I cannot find any documentation showing how to do it. I would like to turn on the experimental closure compiler. Am I missing something? No, there's no way to pass arguments that have not been exposed explicitly by the gwt-maven-plugin. BTW, I just pushed enableClosureCompilerhttps://github.com/gwt-maven-plugin/gwt-maven-plugin/commit/e9ca26c0dd60ac196dfb4390cf7352bd7f834821, so you can mvn install the plugin (or download the latest artifact from BuildHivehttps://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/gwt-maven-plugin/job/gwt-maven-plugin/24/org.codehaus.mojo$gwt-maven-plugin/and deploy it in your repo) and start using it. There are still a few open issues in the roadmaphttp://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MGWT/fixforversion/17850for the gwt-maven-plugin (and there are probably other issues we'd like to add there), but we might make the 2.5.0-rc1 release without waiting for all of them to be resolved. If you wan't use a SNAPSHOT, then in the mean time you can switch to running the compiler with the exec-maven-plugin. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/Gkn9XOh5DycJ. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Re: Custom compiler options with the gwt maven plugin
Thank you, switched to snapshot. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/a1ZoEioe_xIJ. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
Compiler options
What is the difference between -optimize 0 and -draftCompile? I do no see any difference in terms of compilation speed and js file size. In terms of compilation speed there is *very* little difference between -optimize 0 and -optimize 9. So in what scenarios are these relevant? Regards, Ronald -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
