date:20141018

Ok, now I see 8578 
 with 
the "ReleaseNote-BreakingChange" tag.

On Saturday, October 18, 2014 3:53:54 PM UTC-7, Thomas Broyer wrote:
>
> 2.7 uses "xsiframe" by default when "std" was the default in previous 
> versions.
>
> On Sunday, October 19, 2014 12:42:27 AM UTC+2, Jim Douglas wrote:
>>
>> Does GWT 2.7 change the default linker behaviour?  This configuration 
>> works fine in GWT 2.6.1.
>>
>> On Saturday, October 18, 2014 3:05:33 PM UTC-7, Jens wrote:
>>>
>>> Because ASM 4+ guarantees API compatibility, when we switched to 5.0.3 
 (to support Java 8) we decided to use it directly without "rebasing".

>>>
>>> Maybe we should bundle ASM 5 in the SDK zip file and let GPE add it to 
>>> the class path if no dependency management tool is used. Otherwise 
>>> beginners might be lost when starting with GWT if simply installing GPE + 
>>> 2.7 SDK through Eclipse update site doesn't work anymore.
>>>
>>> -- J.
>>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT 
Contributors" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/6a434026-7d74-4a7e-bd06-cacecca4623b%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.7.0 beta1

2.7 uses "xsiframe" by default when "std" was the default in previous 
versions.

On Sunday, October 19, 2014 12:42:27 AM UTC+2, Jim Douglas wrote:
>
> Does GWT 2.7 change the default linker behaviour?  This configuration 
> works fine in GWT 2.6.1.
>
> On Saturday, October 18, 2014 3:05:33 PM UTC-7, Jens wrote:
>>
>> Because ASM 4+ guarantees API compatibility, when we switched to 5.0.3 
>>> (to support Java 8) we decided to use it directly without "rebasing".
>>>
>>
>> Maybe we should bundle ASM 5 in the SDK zip file and let GPE add it to 
>> the class path if no dependency management tool is used. Otherwise 
>> beginners might be lost when starting with GWT if simply installing GPE + 
>> 2.7 SDK through Eclipse update site doesn't work anymore.
>>
>> -- J.
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT 
Contributors" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/56a1aec5-4ba9-4b01-97fe-d13930742ad4%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [gwt-contrib] Build gwtproject?

Thanks. I think one of the issues with deploying is the credentials 
provision to the remoteapi and deployment entrypoint. I've been wanting to 
help with the official GAE maven plugin to help with this but haven't got 
there yet. Anyways, nice that you're looking into this.

I'm not seeing the http://www.gwtproject.org/doctype/2.7.0/gwt-module.dtd  
resources. Either they have been updated, or I configured the assembly 
wrong and there not getting copied in the build to generated site. 

Thanks,
Brandon

On Saturday, October 18, 2014 2:56:52 PM UTC-7, Manuel Carrasco Moñino 
wrote:
>
> I have created a task in Jenkins and used it to update the site
>
> The task is private (only admins can see it) and It's not enabled to be 
> run whenever a new change is done, but after fixing a couple of issues it 
> will run automatically.
>
> Brandon, could you check that all the stuff you need is there?
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 11:36 AM, Manuel Carrasco Moñino <
> man...@apache.org > wrote:
>
>> Shouldn't this be a task in our CI server, so as we always have the most 
>> recent stuff approved and merged?
>>
>> - Manolo
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 9:28 AM, Julien Dramaix > > wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Brandon
>>>
>>> I will do that this week end !
>>>
>>> Just ping me monday if it doesn't work.
>>>
>>> Julien
>>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 4:34 AM, Brandon Donnelson >> > wrote:
>>>
 Could gwtproject site be built?

 I'm looking for access to these:
 http://www.gwtproject.org/doctype/2.7.0/gwt-module.dtd 

 Thanks,
 Brandon

 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
 Groups "GWT Contributors" group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
 an email to 
 google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
 .
 To view this discussion on the web visit 
 https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/8f5c5e44-1543-4f64-84f8-0704507bb028%40googlegroups.com
  
 
 .
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

>>>
>>>  -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>> Groups "GWT Contributors" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>> an email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
>>> .
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/CABb_3%3D6gRewmZmOt14oNYSrcMjWYR%2BeWnnb3FgEzFrSGm2xwug%40mail.gmail.com
>>>  
>>> 
>>> .
>>>
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT 
Contributors" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/8ef1bbe6-a651-488e-bbbc-c53c817546bd%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.7.0 beta1

Seems to me that the script injector isn't perfect with the onload callback 
but its one of the ways to do it after the onmodule load. I often will 
inject them in the dom afterwords. Google mays has an interesting way where 
it has a call back after its loaded which is nifty. Or I will poll until 
the object is available. I liked the script injector but it hasn't been 
consistent for me. 

On Saturday, October 18, 2014 3:42:27 PM UTC-7, Jim Douglas wrote:
>
> Does GWT 2.7 change the default linker behaviour?  This configuration 
> works fine in GWT 2.6.1.
>
> On Saturday, October 18, 2014 3:05:33 PM UTC-7, Jens wrote:
>>
>> Because ASM 4+ guarantees API compatibility, when we switched to 5.0.3 
>>> (to support Java 8) we decided to use it directly without "rebasing".
>>>
>>
>> Maybe we should bundle ASM 5 in the SDK zip file and let GPE add it to 
>> the class path if no dependency management tool is used. Otherwise 
>> beginners might be lost when starting with GWT if simply installing GPE + 
>> 2.7 SDK through Eclipse update site doesn't work anymore.
>>
>> -- J.
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT 
Contributors" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/f39068d6-b536-49ff-bec0-8c72590b1571%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [gwt-contrib] Change packaging for GSS

2014-10-18 Thread Julien Dramaix

I will work on that tomorrow
On Oct 18, 2014 8:10 PM, "'Daniel Kurka' via GWT Contributors" <
google-web-toolkit-contributors@googlegroups.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> apparently we ended up packaging gss into gwt-dev instead of gwt-user:
> https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/#/c/9803/
>
> @Thomas, @Julien can you guys look into providing a patch that moves this
> into gwt-user?
>
> -Daniel
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "GWT Contributors" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/CALLujipLY9ydhxTG0__D0vVojSpuCGQAmLb1aD-rPOBz1Me62A%40mail.gmail.com
> 
> .
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT 
Contributors" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/CABb_3%3D6WzhN2n4fKHeXt7%2BvY2WEUHbTiqDQgV3db3dGyPdC0vw%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.7.0 beta1

Does GWT 2.7 change the default linker behaviour?  This configuration works 
fine in GWT 2.6.1.

On Saturday, October 18, 2014 3:05:33 PM UTC-7, Jens wrote:
>
> Because ASM 4+ guarantees API compatibility, when we switched to 5.0.3 (to 
>> support Java 8) we decided to use it directly without "rebasing".
>>
>
> Maybe we should bundle ASM 5 in the SDK zip file and let GPE add it to the 
> class path if no dependency management tool is used. Otherwise beginners 
> might be lost when starting with GWT if simply installing GPE + 2.7 SDK 
> through Eclipse update site doesn't work anymore.
>
> -- J.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT 
Contributors" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/01d1b9cb-839a-4a61-b093-e1cd6177373f%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

[gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.7.0-SNAPSHOT in Google maven snapshot repo



On Saturday, October 18, 2014 11:55:46 PM UTC+2, Max Völkel wrote:
>
> I am a bit surprised this is almost a YEAR old. Anyway, in which repo can 
> I find a (hopefully recent) 2.7 SNAPSHOT?
>

Snapshots are deployed nightly (if the build is green) to 
https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/google-snapshots/
…or you could use the just-released 2.7.0-beta1

>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT 
Contributors" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/c47653e7-fa4a-4de5-a763-dceacbf803fc%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.7.0 beta1

2014-10-18 Thread 'Goktug Gokdogan' via GWT Contributors



On Sunday, October 19, 2014 12:13:04 AM UTC+2, Goktug Gokdogan wrote:
>
> Is there any fundamental reason why we don't support script tags for 
> Cross-Site-IFrame?
>

IIRC that might have to do with detecting when scripts have finished 
loading, because

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.7.0 beta1

2014-10-18 Thread Manuel Carrasco Moñino

IIRC is because scripts should be guaranteed to be loaded before the
onModuleLoad is run, and it was done with document.write before xsiframe

On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 12:12 AM, 'Goktug Gokdogan' via GWT Contributors <
google-web-toolkit-contributors@googlegroups.com> wrote:

> Is there any fundamental reason why we don't support script tags for
> Cross-Site-IFrame?
>
> On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 2:54 PM, Jens  wrote:
>
>>Invoking Linker Cross-Site-Iframe
>>>
>>>   [ERROR] The Cross-Site-Iframe linker does not support

[gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.7.0-SNAPSHOT in Google maven snapshot repo

2014-10-18 Thread Max Völkel

I am a bit surprised this is almost a YEAR old. Anyway, in which repo can I 
find a (hopefully recent) 2.7 SNAPSHOT?

On Wednesday, November 27, 2013 1:03:26 AM UTC+1, Matthew Dempsky wrote:
>
> FYI, I've pushed out a build of master to Maven as 2.7.0-SNAPSHOT.  Not 
> sure if the next release will be "2.7", but it needed *some* version and 
> that seemed as good as any.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT 
Contributors" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/557ecfdd-44af-4ee9-9cb2-f2ffc76d9240%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.7.0 beta1

Is there any fundamental reason why we don't support script tags for
Cross-Site-IFrame?

On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 2:54 PM, Jens  wrote:

>Invoking Linker Cross-Site-Iframe
>>
>>   [ERROR] The Cross-Site-Iframe linker does not support

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.7.0 beta1


>
> Because ASM 4+ guarantees API compatibility, when we switched to 5.0.3 (to 
> support Java 8) we decided to use it directly without "rebasing".
>

Maybe we should bundle ASM 5 in the SDK zip file and let GPE add it to the 
class path if no dependency management tool is used. Otherwise beginners 
might be lost when starting with GWT if simply installing GPE + 2.7 SDK 
through Eclipse update site doesn't work anymore.

-- J.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT 
Contributors" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/49abff14-6dff-4eba-b42b-f2fa8dee6653%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [gwt-contrib] Build gwtproject?

2014-10-18 Thread Manuel Carrasco Moñino

I have created a task in Jenkins and used it to update the site

The task is private (only admins can see it) and It's not enabled to be run
whenever a new change is done, but after fixing a couple of issues it will
run automatically.

Brandon, could you check that all the stuff you need is there?


On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 11:36 AM, Manuel Carrasco Moñino 
wrote:

> Shouldn't this be a task in our CI server, so as we always have the most
> recent stuff approved and merged?
>
> - Manolo
>
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 9:28 AM, Julien Dramaix 
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Brandon
>>
>> I will do that this week end !
>>
>> Just ping me monday if it doesn't work.
>>
>> Julien
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 4:34 AM, Brandon Donnelson <
>> branflake2...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Could gwtproject site be built?
>>>
>>> I'm looking for access to these:
>>> http://www.gwtproject.org/doctype/2.7.0/gwt-module.dtd
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Brandon
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "GWT Contributors" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
>>> .
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/8f5c5e44-1543-4f64-84f8-0704507bb028%40googlegroups.com
>>> 
>>> .
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>
>>  --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "GWT Contributors" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/CABb_3%3D6gRewmZmOt14oNYSrcMjWYR%2BeWnnb3FgEzFrSGm2xwug%40mail.gmail.com
>> 
>> .
>>
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT 
Contributors" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/CAM28XAtYsPc6NBDQoZqPQ8s8isL6uJU8M53p%2B_1-irG7WJDF5Q%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.7.0 beta1


>
>Invoking Linker Cross-Site-Iframe
>
>   [ERROR] The Cross-Site-Iframe linker does not support

[gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.7.0 beta1

FYI, I'm releasing 2.7.0-beta1 of the gwt-maven-plugin (website is 
uploading as I write, then sync to Central could take a few hours too).

On Saturday, October 18, 2014 7:54:40 PM UTC+2, Daniel Kurka wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> since we are adding major features to GWT, we decided to change our 
> release process for GWT 2.7. I just published GWT 2.7.0-beta1 to maven 
> central and our file storage .
> We are doing this beta to get external feedback on incremental compilation 
> and GSS.
>
> Incremental compilation is now default with GWT 2.7 and replaces, together 
> with Super dev mode, the regular old dev mode. Inside of Google we are 
> already using it for a while now and most of the issues should have already 
> been dealt with, however we also want to make sure that external users that 
> might have slightly different use cases will have a working 2.7.0 release.
>
> So please start testing with beta1 and give us lots of feedback on the 
> contributor 
> list 
>  
> or on the issue tracker 
> . Please keep 
> in mind that we did not do any release testing on beta1, so there might be 
> issues that you do not expect from a release candidate.
>
> Our current plan is to wait until the end of next week for any feedback. 
> If we do not find any serious external issues we will start the testing 
> process for an actual release candidate.
>
> -Daniel
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT 
Contributors" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/08ef3300-4193-4331-a287-d11e7a6fbba5%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.7.0 beta1

On Saturday, October 18, 2014 9:27:20 PM UTC+2, Jim Douglas wrote:
>
> Eureka!  (Or not quite, but that was much closer to working.)  Apparently 
> our overall project is dependent on asm-all-3.1.jar, and GWT 2.7.0 has a 
> newer dependency than GWT 2.6.1 (and the APIs are inompatible). 
>

Prior to version 4, ASM made no guarantee of API compatibility between 
versions, and as a result should not be used without "rebasing / 
repackaging", or only in projects where you're 100% sure you won't have a 
conflict.
Because ASM 4+ guarantees API compatibility, when we switched to 5.0.3 (to 
support Java 8) we decided to use it directly without "rebasing".

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT 
Contributors" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/d5ccd932-dbc5-4b68-9ab0-36134cbd6d46%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.7.0 beta1

Hmm.  We do have this in our project.gwt.xml file:

  

I inherited ownership of this project; I'm not sure why that was added. 
 Removing it does correct that crash.  That leaves me with a few 
new-for-2.7 linker errors:

Compiling module com.basis.bbj.web.gwt.EnglishOnly

   Computing all possible rebind results for 
'com.basis.bbj.web.gwt.client.message.data.ServerMessageReconstructor'

  Rebinding 
com.basis.bbj.web.gwt.client.message.data.ServerMessageReconstructor

 Invoking generator 
com.basis.bbj.web.gwt.server.message.ServerMessageReconstructorGenerator

Emitting code-splitting switches for MessageGroups: [DEFAULT, 
CONSOLE, GRID, MENU, NATIVE, OPTIONAL]

   [WARN] Call to Enum method toString when enum obfuscation is enabled:  
com/basis/bbj/web/gwt/client/GridGWTEventHelper.java:408

   [WARN] Call to Enum method toString when enum obfuscation is enabled:  
com/basis/bbj/web/gwt/client/GridGWTEventHelper.java:412

   [WARN] Call to Enum method toString when enum obfuscation is enabled:  
com/basis/bbj/web/gwt/client/GridGWTBrowserSpecifics_typeA.java:110

   Compiling 5 permutations

  Compiling permutation 0...

  Process output

 Compiling

Compiling permutation 1...

  Compiling permutation 2...

 Compiling

Compiling permutation 3...

  Compiling permutation 4...

   Compile of permutations succeeded

   Compilation succeeded -- 67.406s

Linking into /Users/jimdouglas/workspace/BBj/war/gwtwebclient

   Invoking Linker CSS Renaming Linker

  Renaming styles in "basis.css"

  Renaming styles in "basisOld.css"

  Renaming styles in "basisUtils.css"

  Renaming styles in "gwt/standard/standard.css"

  Renaming styles in "gwt/standard/standard_rtl.css"

  Renaming styles in "jquery-ui.min.css"

  Renaming styles in "jquery-ui.structure.min.css"

   Invoking Linker Cross-Site-Iframe

  [ERROR] The Cross-Site-Iframe linker does not support

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.7.0 beta1


>
>   Process output
>
 Compiling
>
> Compiling permutation 1...
>
>   [ERROR] An internal compiler exception occurred
>
> com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.InternalCompilerException: Could not find property 
> compiler.max.vars.per.var
>

Hm thats strange. The variable is defined in CompilerParameters.gwt.xml in 
gwt-user.jar. Have you modified the variable? As you also get warnings 
about calling Enum.toString() while enums obfuscation is turned on (by 
default it is off) it seems like you have played around with the compiler 
properties.

-- J.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT 
Contributors" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/0ab06948-3c6c-4c82-878b-478a548ff8ee%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.7.0 beta1

Eureka!  (Or not quite, but that was much closer to working.)  Apparently 
our overall project is dependent on asm-all-3.1.jar, and GWT 2.7.0 has a 
newer dependency than GWT 2.6.1 (and the APIs are inompatible).  Ok, 
swapping in asm-all-5.0.3.jar introduces a flood of build errors in another 
part of the project, but it allows the GWT compile to make much more 
progress; the new error is:

Compiling module com.basis.bbj.web.gwt.EnglishOnly

   Computing all possible rebind results for 
'com.basis.bbj.web.gwt.client.message.data.ServerMessageReconstructor'

  Rebinding 
com.basis.bbj.web.gwt.client.message.data.ServerMessageReconstructor

 Invoking generator 
com.basis.bbj.web.gwt.server.message.ServerMessageReconstructorGenerator

Emitting code-splitting switches for MessageGroups: [DEFAULT, 
CONSOLE, GRID, MENU, NATIVE, OPTIONAL]

   [WARN] Call to Enum method toString when enum obfuscation is enabled:  
com/basis/bbj/web/gwt/client/GridGWTEventHelper.java:408

   [WARN] Call to Enum method toString when enum obfuscation is enabled:  
com/basis/bbj/web/gwt/client/GridGWTEventHelper.java:412

   [WARN] Call to Enum method toString when enum obfuscation is enabled:  
com/basis/bbj/web/gwt/client/GridGWTBrowserSpecifics_typeA.java:110

   Compiling 5 permutations

  Compiling permutation 0...

  Process output

 Compiling

Compiling permutation 1...

  [ERROR] An internal compiler exception occurred

com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.InternalCompilerException: Could not find property 
compiler.max.vars.per.var

at 
com.google.gwt.dev.js.JsBreakUpLargeVarStatements.(JsBreakUpLargeVarStatements.java:50)

at 
com.google.gwt.dev.js.JsBreakUpLargeVarStatements.exec(JsBreakUpLargeVarStatements.java:38)

at 
com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.JavaToJavaScriptCompiler$PermutationCompiler.compilePermutation(JavaToJavaScriptCompiler.java:337)

at 
com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.MonolithicJavaToJavaScriptCompiler.compilePermutation(MonolithicJavaToJavaScriptCompiler.java:296)

at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.UnifiedAst.compilePermutation(UnifiedAst.java:143)

at com.google.gwt.dev.CompilePerms.compile(CompilePerms.java:197)

at 
com.google.gwt.dev.ThreadedPermutationWorkerFactory$ThreadedPermutationWorker.compile(ThreadedPermutationWorkerFactory.java:50)

at 
com.google.gwt.dev.PermutationWorkerFactory$Manager$WorkerThread.run(PermutationWorkerFactory.java:74)

at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)

  [ERROR] Unrecoverable exception, shutting down

com.google.gwt.core.ext.UnableToCompleteException: (see previous log 
entries)

at 
com.google.gwt.dev.javac.CompilationProblemReporter.logAndTranslateException(CompilationProblemReporter.java:106)

at 
com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.JavaToJavaScriptCompiler$PermutationCompiler.compilePermutation(JavaToJavaScriptCompiler.java:362)

at 
com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.MonolithicJavaToJavaScriptCompiler.compilePermutation(MonolithicJavaToJavaScriptCompiler.java:296)

at com.google.gwt.dev.jjs.UnifiedAst.compilePermutation(UnifiedAst.java:143)

at com.google.gwt.dev.CompilePerms.compile(CompilePerms.java:197)

at 
com.google.gwt.dev.ThreadedPermutationWorkerFactory$ThreadedPermutationWorker.compile(ThreadedPermutationWorkerFactory.java:50)

at 
com.google.gwt.dev.PermutationWorkerFactory$Manager$WorkerThread.run(PermutationWorkerFactory.java:74)

at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)

  [ERROR] Not all permutation were compiled , completed (0/5)

  [WARN] Lost communication with remote process

java.net.SocketException: Socket closed

at java.net.SocketInputStream.socketRead0(Native Method)

at java.net.SocketInputStream.read(SocketInputStream.java:152)

at java.net.SocketInputStream.read(SocketInputStream.java:122)

at java.net.SocketInputStream.read(SocketInputStream.java:210)

at 
java.io.ObjectInputStream$PeekInputStream.peek(ObjectInputStream.java:2293)

at 
java.io.ObjectInputStream$BlockDataInputStream.peek(ObjectInputStream.java:2586)

at 
java.io.ObjectInputStream$BlockDataInputStream.peekByte(ObjectInputStream.java:2596)

at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readObject0(ObjectInputStream.java:1318)

at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readObject(ObjectInputStream.java:370)

at 
com.google.gwt.dev.ExternalPermutationWorkerFactory$ExternalPermutationWorker.compile(ExternalPermutationWorkerFactory.java:154)

at 
com.google.gwt.dev.PermutationWorkerFactory$Manager$WorkerThread.run(PermutationWorkerFactory.java:74)

at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)


On Saturday, October 18, 2014 11:47:13 AM UTC-7, Jens wrote:
>
> No difference...this is the stack trace after erasing gwt-unitCache and 
>> retrying.
>>
>
> Does it work if you put ASM 5.0.3 on class path? 
> http://forge.ow2.org/projects/asm/
>
> -- J.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT 
Contributors" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.7.0 beta1


>
> No difference...this is the stack trace after erasing gwt-unitCache and 
> retrying.
>

Does it work if you put ASM 5.0.3 on class 
path? http://forge.ow2.org/projects/asm/

-- J.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT 
Contributors" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/c7b43628-6f2a-4dad-8dcf-527e3c2f3061%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Maven release process broken

Cool, nice work. 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT 
Contributors" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/fbc3820e-0737-4790-a17b-fde9ae2f6de1%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.7.0 beta1

I suspect you may need an exclusion or library sort so gwt has a higher
priority in the dependency order.

Have a good day,
Brandon Donnelson
+Follow Me 

On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 11:43 AM, Brandon Donnelson  wrote:

> The org.ow2.asm dependency has moved, and I see asm in the class above I
> wonder you're dependency configuration look like?
>
> Have a good day,
> Brandon Donnelson
> +Follow Me 
>
> On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 11:41 AM, Jim Douglas  wrote:
>
>> Not trying to run either dev mode, just trying to GWT Compile the package.
>>
>> On Saturday, October 18, 2014 11:31:44 AM UTC-7, Brandon Donnelson wrote:
>>>
>>> There is no special GPE support needed to run GWT 2.7.0-beta1. The same
>>> launch configs can be used.
>>>
>>> Although if you want to run dev mode, use -nosuperDevMode.
>>>
>>  --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
>> Google Groups "GWT Contributors" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/google-web-toolkit-contributors/vCELYDM2_tE/unsubscribe
>> .
>> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
>> google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/a16f70fe-60df-464d-995e-8db07f2e4fa4%40googlegroups.com
>> 
>> .
>>
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT 
Contributors" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/CAPnsdHRMCtArJ9HZunx6Q9pypP91D5fQP_fuGe2RT%2BUaFpGckA%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.7.0 beta1

The org.ow2.asm dependency has moved, and I see asm in the class above I
wonder you're dependency configuration look like?

Have a good day,
Brandon Donnelson
+Follow Me 

On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 11:41 AM, Jim Douglas  wrote:

> Not trying to run either dev mode, just trying to GWT Compile the package.
>
> On Saturday, October 18, 2014 11:31:44 AM UTC-7, Brandon Donnelson wrote:
>>
>> There is no special GPE support needed to run GWT 2.7.0-beta1. The same
>> launch configs can be used.
>>
>> Although if you want to run dev mode, use -nosuperDevMode.
>>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
> Google Groups "GWT Contributors" group.
> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/google-web-toolkit-contributors/vCELYDM2_tE/unsubscribe
> .
> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
> google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/a16f70fe-60df-464d-995e-8db07f2e4fa4%40googlegroups.com
> 
> .
>
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT 
Contributors" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/CAPnsdHTcr5%3D7h6en40jRapDV6y9y37%3Dc7s_51dkGZ0AbvPoPiw%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

[gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.7.0 beta1

Not trying to run either dev mode, just trying to GWT Compile the package.

On Saturday, October 18, 2014 11:31:44 AM UTC-7, Brandon Donnelson wrote:
>
> There is no special GPE support needed to run GWT 2.7.0-beta1. The same 
> launch configs can be used. 
>
> Although if you want to run dev mode, use -nosuperDevMode.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT 
Contributors" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/a16f70fe-60df-464d-995e-8db07f2e4fa4%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.7.0 beta1

No difference...this is the stack trace after erasing gwt-unitCache and 
retrying.

Compiling module com.basis.bbj.web.gwt.EnglishOnly

[ERROR] Unexpected internal compiler error

java.lang.IncompatibleClassChangeError: class 
com.google.gwt.dev.javac.asm.CollectMethodData has interface 
org.objectweb.asm.MethodVisitor as super class

at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass1(Native Method)

at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass(ClassLoader.java:800)

at java.security.SecureClassLoader.defineClass(SecureClassLoader.java:142)

at java.net.URLClassLoader.defineClass(URLClassLoader.java:449)

at java.net.URLClassLoader.access$100(URLClassLoader.java:71)

at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:361)

at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:355)

at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)

at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:354)

at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:425)

at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:308)

at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:358)

at java.lang.Class.getDeclaredMethods0(Native Method)

at java.lang.Class.privateGetDeclaredMethods(Class.java:2615)

at java.lang.Class.getDeclaredMethod(Class.java:2007)

at java.io.ObjectStreamClass.getPrivateMethod(ObjectStreamClass.java:1431)

at java.io.ObjectStreamClass.access$1700(ObjectStreamClass.java:72)

at java.io.ObjectStreamClass$2.run(ObjectStreamClass.java:494)

at java.io.ObjectStreamClass$2.run(ObjectStreamClass.java:468)

at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)

at java.io.ObjectStreamClass.(ObjectStreamClass.java:468)

at java.io.ObjectStreamClass.lookup(ObjectStreamClass.java:365)

at java.io.ObjectStreamClass.initNonProxy(ObjectStreamClass.java:602)

at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readNonProxyDesc(ObjectInputStream.java:1622)

at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readClassDesc(ObjectInputStream.java:1517)

at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readOrdinaryObject(ObjectInputStream.java:1771)

at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readObject0(ObjectInputStream.java:1350)

at java.io.ObjectInputStream.defaultReadFields(ObjectInputStream.java:1990)

at java.io.ObjectInputStream.defaultReadObject(ObjectInputStream.java:500)

at 
com.google.gwt.dev.javac.CachedCompilationUnit.readObject(CachedCompilationUnit.java:202)

at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)

at 
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)

at 
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)

at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606)

at java.io.ObjectStreamClass.invokeReadObject(ObjectStreamClass.java:1017)

at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readSerialData(ObjectInputStream.java:1893)

at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readOrdinaryObject(ObjectInputStream.java:1798)

at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readObject0(ObjectInputStream.java:1350)

at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readArray(ObjectInputStream.java:1706)

at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readObject0(ObjectInputStream.java:1344)

at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readObject(ObjectInputStream.java:370)

at 
com.google.gwt.dev.javac.CompilationUnitArchive.readObject(CompilationUnitArchive.java:124)

at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)

at 
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)

at 
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)

at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606)

at java.io.ObjectStreamClass.invokeReadObject(ObjectStreamClass.java:1017)

at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readSerialData(ObjectInputStream.java:1893)

at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readOrdinaryObject(ObjectInputStream.java:1798)

at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readObject0(ObjectInputStream.java:1350)

at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readObject(ObjectInputStream.java:370)

at 
com.google.gwt.dev.javac.CompilationUnitArchive.createFromStream(CompilationUnitArchive.java:59)

at 
com.google.gwt.dev.javac.CompilationUnitArchive.createFromURL(CompilationUnitArchive.java:66)

at 
com.google.gwt.dev.ArchivePreloader.preloadArchives(ArchivePreloader.java:62)

at com.google.gwt.dev.Precompile.precompile(Precompile.java:246)

at com.google.gwt.dev.Precompile.precompile(Precompile.java:229)

at com.google.gwt.dev.Precompile.precompile(Precompile.java:145)

at com.google.gwt.dev.Compiler.run(Compiler.java:204)

at com.google.gwt.dev.Compiler.run(Compiler.java:156)

at com.google.gwt.dev.Compiler$1.run(Compiler.java:118)

at com.google.gwt.dev.CompileTaskRunner.doRun(CompileTaskRunner.java:55)

at 
com.google.gwt.dev.CompileTaskRunner.runWithAppropriateLogger(CompileTaskRunner.java:50)

at com.google.gwt.dev.Compiler.main(Compiler.java:125)


On Saturday, October 18, 2014 11:34:40 AM UTC-7, Jim Douglas wrote:
>
> Crap, I knew that, but it's been a few years since it last tripped me up, 
> so I forgot; retrying now.
>
> On Saturday, October 18, 2014 11:21:23 AM UTC-7, Daniel Kur

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Maven release process broken

2014-10-18 Thread 'Daniel Kurka' via GWT Contributors

oops was still a draft, now its okay.

On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 8:34 PM, Brandon Donnelson 
wrote:

> The patch link provided is bad.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "GWT Contributors" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/5697ce4d-4250-4e06-81ad-90dbef174407%40googlegroups.com
> 
> .
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>



-- 
Google Germany GmbH
*Dienerstr. 12*
*80331 München*

Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg
Geschäftsführer: Graham Law, Katherine Stephens

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT 
Contributors" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/CALLujiopftORJAKD6%3DKavz29%2BuXpguW9im5hvUwq2Aj8HJgWeA%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.7.0 beta1

Crap, I knew that, but it's been a few years since it last tripped me up, 
so I forgot; retrying now.

On Saturday, October 18, 2014 11:21:23 AM UTC-7, Daniel Kurka wrote:
>
> This looks like an issue with your gwt-unitCache. Can you clear it and 
> retry?
>
> -Daniel
>
> On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 8:17 PM, Jim Douglas  > wrote:
>
>> Is GPE support still pending?  I just did a quick test in Kepler.  I set 
>> this as my default GWT SDK, then attempted to GWT Compile my project; it 
>> died immediately with this stack trace:
>>
>> Compiling module com.basis.bbj.web.gwt.EnglishOnly
>>
>> [ERROR] Unexpected internal compiler error
>>
>> java.lang.IncompatibleClassChangeError: class 
>> com.google.gwt.dev.javac.asm.CollectMethodData has interface 
>> org.objectweb.asm.MethodVisitor as super class
>>
>> at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass1(Native Method)
>>
>> at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass(ClassLoader.java:800)
>>
>> at java.security.SecureClassLoader.defineClass(SecureClassLoader.java:142)
>>
>> at java.net.URLClassLoader.defineClass(URLClassLoader.java:449)
>>
>> at java.net.URLClassLoader.access$100(URLClassLoader.java:71)
>>
>> at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:361)
>>
>> at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:355)
>>
>> at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
>>
>> at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:354)
>>
>> at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:425)
>>
>> at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:308)
>>
>> at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:358)
>>
>> at java.lang.Class.getDeclaredMethods0(Native Method)
>>
>> at java.lang.Class.privateGetDeclaredMethods(Class.java:2615)
>>
>> at java.lang.Class.getDeclaredMethod(Class.java:2007)
>>
>> at java.io.ObjectStreamClass.getPrivateMethod(ObjectStreamClass.java:1431)
>>
>> at java.io.ObjectStreamClass.access$1700(ObjectStreamClass.java:72)
>>
>> at java.io.ObjectStreamClass$2.run(ObjectStreamClass.java:494)
>>
>> at java.io.ObjectStreamClass$2.run(ObjectStreamClass.java:468)
>>
>> at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
>>
>> at java.io.ObjectStreamClass.(ObjectStreamClass.java:468)
>>
>> at java.io.ObjectStreamClass.lookup(ObjectStreamClass.java:365)
>>
>> at java.io.ObjectStreamClass.initNonProxy(ObjectStreamClass.java:602)
>>
>> at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readNonProxyDesc(ObjectInputStream.java:1622)
>>
>> at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readClassDesc(ObjectInputStream.java:1517)
>>
>> at 
>> java.io.ObjectInputStream.readOrdinaryObject(ObjectInputStream.java:1771)
>>
>> at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readObject0(ObjectInputStream.java:1350)
>>
>> at 
>> java.io.ObjectInputStream.defaultReadFields(ObjectInputStream.java:1990)
>>
>> at java.io.ObjectInputStream.defaultReadObject(ObjectInputStream.java:500)
>>
>> at 
>> com.google.gwt.dev.javac.CachedCompilationUnit.readObject(CachedCompilationUnit.java:202)
>>
>> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>>
>> at 
>> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
>>
>> at 
>> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
>>
>> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606)
>>
>> at java.io.ObjectStreamClass.invokeReadObject(ObjectStreamClass.java:1017)
>>
>> at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readSerialData(ObjectInputStream.java:1893)
>>
>> at 
>> java.io.ObjectInputStream.readOrdinaryObject(ObjectInputStream.java:1798)
>>
>> at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readObject0(ObjectInputStream.java:1350)
>>
>> at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readArray(ObjectInputStream.java:1706)
>>
>> at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readObject0(ObjectInputStream.java:1344)
>>
>> at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readObject(ObjectInputStream.java:370)
>>
>> at 
>> com.google.gwt.dev.javac.CompilationUnitArchive.readObject(CompilationUnitArchive.java:124)
>>
>> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>>
>> at 
>> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
>>
>> at 
>> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
>>
>> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606)
>>
>> at java.io.ObjectStreamClass.invokeReadObject(ObjectStreamClass.java:1017)
>>
>> at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readSerialData(ObjectInputStream.java:1893)
>>
>> at 
>> java.io.ObjectInputStream.readOrdinaryObject(ObjectInputStream.java:1798)
>>
>> at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readObject0(ObjectInputStream.java:1350)
>>
>> at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readObject(ObjectInputStream.java:370)
>>
>> at 
>> com.google.gwt.dev.javac.CompilationUnitArchive.createFromStream(CompilationUnitArchive.java:59)
>>
>> at 
>> com.google.gwt.dev.javac.CompilationUnitArchive.createFromURL(CompilationUnitArchive.java:66)
>>
>> at 
>> com.google.gwt.dev.ArchivePreloader.preloadArchives(ArchivePreloader.java:62)
>>
>> at com.google.gwt.dev.Precompile.precompile(Pr

[gwt-contrib] Re: Maven release process broken

The patch link provided is bad. 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT 
Contributors" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/5697ce4d-4250-4e06-81ad-90dbef174407%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

[gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.7.0 beta1

There is no special GPE support needed to run GWT 2.7.0-beta1. The same 
launch configs can be used. 

Although if you want to run dev mode, use -nosuperDevMode.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT 
Contributors" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/87f84bf9-f9ea-4be2-899f-d131b2510b4e%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

[gwt-contrib] Re: Gwt Version Strategy

Good idea. :)

On Saturday, October 18, 2014 10:52:06 AM UTC-7, Jens wrote:
>
> We could store version information in any jar manifest file using 
> Implementation-* attributes:
>
> Manifest-Version: 1.0
> Ant-Version: Apache Ant 1.8.0
> Created-By: 1.6.0_20-b02 (Sun Microsystems Inc.)
> Implementation-Title: GWT User library / GWT Dev library / Elemental / ... 
> / 
> Implementation-Version: 2.7.0
> Implementation-Vendor: gwtproject.org
>
> This can then be read in Java using 
> classFromJar.getPackage().getImplementation[Title | Version | Vendor](). If 
> all GWT jars would have that information you can choose whatever jar you 
> like most.
>
> -- J.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT 
Contributors" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/2b8dd76e-1ff7-476e-9c5d-950d15f5666c%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.7.0 beta1

2014-10-18 Thread 'Daniel Kurka' via GWT Contributors

This looks like an issue with your gwt-unitCache. Can you clear it and
retry?

-Daniel

On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 8:17 PM, Jim Douglas  wrote:

> Is GPE support still pending?  I just did a quick test in Kepler.  I set
> this as my default GWT SDK, then attempted to GWT Compile my project; it
> died immediately with this stack trace:
>
> Compiling module com.basis.bbj.web.gwt.EnglishOnly
>
> [ERROR] Unexpected internal compiler error
>
> java.lang.IncompatibleClassChangeError: class
> com.google.gwt.dev.javac.asm.CollectMethodData has interface
> org.objectweb.asm.MethodVisitor as super class
>
> at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass1(Native Method)
>
> at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass(ClassLoader.java:800)
>
> at java.security.SecureClassLoader.defineClass(SecureClassLoader.java:142)
>
> at java.net.URLClassLoader.defineClass(URLClassLoader.java:449)
>
> at java.net.URLClassLoader.access$100(URLClassLoader.java:71)
>
> at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:361)
>
> at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:355)
>
> at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
>
> at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:354)
>
> at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:425)
>
> at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:308)
>
> at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:358)
>
> at java.lang.Class.getDeclaredMethods0(Native Method)
>
> at java.lang.Class.privateGetDeclaredMethods(Class.java:2615)
>
> at java.lang.Class.getDeclaredMethod(Class.java:2007)
>
> at java.io.ObjectStreamClass.getPrivateMethod(ObjectStreamClass.java:1431)
>
> at java.io.ObjectStreamClass.access$1700(ObjectStreamClass.java:72)
>
> at java.io.ObjectStreamClass$2.run(ObjectStreamClass.java:494)
>
> at java.io.ObjectStreamClass$2.run(ObjectStreamClass.java:468)
>
> at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
>
> at java.io.ObjectStreamClass.(ObjectStreamClass.java:468)
>
> at java.io.ObjectStreamClass.lookup(ObjectStreamClass.java:365)
>
> at java.io.ObjectStreamClass.initNonProxy(ObjectStreamClass.java:602)
>
> at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readNonProxyDesc(ObjectInputStream.java:1622)
>
> at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readClassDesc(ObjectInputStream.java:1517)
>
> at
> java.io.ObjectInputStream.readOrdinaryObject(ObjectInputStream.java:1771)
>
> at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readObject0(ObjectInputStream.java:1350)
>
> at java.io.ObjectInputStream.defaultReadFields(ObjectInputStream.java:1990)
>
> at java.io.ObjectInputStream.defaultReadObject(ObjectInputStream.java:500)
>
> at
> com.google.gwt.dev.javac.CachedCompilationUnit.readObject(CachedCompilationUnit.java:202)
>
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>
> at
> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
>
> at
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
>
> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606)
>
> at java.io.ObjectStreamClass.invokeReadObject(ObjectStreamClass.java:1017)
>
> at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readSerialData(ObjectInputStream.java:1893)
>
> at
> java.io.ObjectInputStream.readOrdinaryObject(ObjectInputStream.java:1798)
>
> at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readObject0(ObjectInputStream.java:1350)
>
> at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readArray(ObjectInputStream.java:1706)
>
> at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readObject0(ObjectInputStream.java:1344)
>
> at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readObject(ObjectInputStream.java:370)
>
> at
> com.google.gwt.dev.javac.CompilationUnitArchive.readObject(CompilationUnitArchive.java:124)
>
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>
> at
> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
>
> at
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
>
> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606)
>
> at java.io.ObjectStreamClass.invokeReadObject(ObjectStreamClass.java:1017)
>
> at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readSerialData(ObjectInputStream.java:1893)
>
> at
> java.io.ObjectInputStream.readOrdinaryObject(ObjectInputStream.java:1798)
>
> at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readObject0(ObjectInputStream.java:1350)
>
> at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readObject(ObjectInputStream.java:370)
>
> at
> com.google.gwt.dev.javac.CompilationUnitArchive.createFromStream(CompilationUnitArchive.java:59)
>
> at
> com.google.gwt.dev.javac.CompilationUnitArchive.createFromURL(CompilationUnitArchive.java:66)
>
> at
> com.google.gwt.dev.ArchivePreloader.preloadArchives(ArchivePreloader.java:62)
>
> at com.google.gwt.dev.Precompile.precompile(Precompile.java:246)
>
> at com.google.gwt.dev.Precompile.precompile(Precompile.java:229)
>
> at com.google.gwt.dev.Precompile.precompile(Precompile.java:145)
>
> at com.google.gwt.dev.Compiler.run(Compiler.java:204)
>
> at com.google.gwt.dev.Compiler.run(Compiler.java:156)
>
> at com.google.gwt.dev.Compiler$1.run(Compiler.java:118)
>
> at c

[gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.7.0 beta1

Is GPE support still pending?  I just did a quick test in Kepler.  I set 
this as my default GWT SDK, then attempted to GWT Compile my project; it 
died immediately with this stack trace:

Compiling module com.basis.bbj.web.gwt.EnglishOnly

[ERROR] Unexpected internal compiler error

java.lang.IncompatibleClassChangeError: class 
com.google.gwt.dev.javac.asm.CollectMethodData has interface 
org.objectweb.asm.MethodVisitor as super class

at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass1(Native Method)

at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass(ClassLoader.java:800)

at java.security.SecureClassLoader.defineClass(SecureClassLoader.java:142)

at java.net.URLClassLoader.defineClass(URLClassLoader.java:449)

at java.net.URLClassLoader.access$100(URLClassLoader.java:71)

at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:361)

at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:355)

at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)

at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:354)

at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:425)

at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:308)

at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:358)

at java.lang.Class.getDeclaredMethods0(Native Method)

at java.lang.Class.privateGetDeclaredMethods(Class.java:2615)

at java.lang.Class.getDeclaredMethod(Class.java:2007)

at java.io.ObjectStreamClass.getPrivateMethod(ObjectStreamClass.java:1431)

at java.io.ObjectStreamClass.access$1700(ObjectStreamClass.java:72)

at java.io.ObjectStreamClass$2.run(ObjectStreamClass.java:494)

at java.io.ObjectStreamClass$2.run(ObjectStreamClass.java:468)

at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)

at java.io.ObjectStreamClass.(ObjectStreamClass.java:468)

at java.io.ObjectStreamClass.lookup(ObjectStreamClass.java:365)

at java.io.ObjectStreamClass.initNonProxy(ObjectStreamClass.java:602)

at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readNonProxyDesc(ObjectInputStream.java:1622)

at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readClassDesc(ObjectInputStream.java:1517)

at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readOrdinaryObject(ObjectInputStream.java:1771)

at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readObject0(ObjectInputStream.java:1350)

at java.io.ObjectInputStream.defaultReadFields(ObjectInputStream.java:1990)

at java.io.ObjectInputStream.defaultReadObject(ObjectInputStream.java:500)

at 
com.google.gwt.dev.javac.CachedCompilationUnit.readObject(CachedCompilationUnit.java:202)

at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)

at 
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)

at 
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)

at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606)

at java.io.ObjectStreamClass.invokeReadObject(ObjectStreamClass.java:1017)

at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readSerialData(ObjectInputStream.java:1893)

at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readOrdinaryObject(ObjectInputStream.java:1798)

at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readObject0(ObjectInputStream.java:1350)

at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readArray(ObjectInputStream.java:1706)

at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readObject0(ObjectInputStream.java:1344)

at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readObject(ObjectInputStream.java:370)

at 
com.google.gwt.dev.javac.CompilationUnitArchive.readObject(CompilationUnitArchive.java:124)

at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)

at 
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)

at 
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)

at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606)

at java.io.ObjectStreamClass.invokeReadObject(ObjectStreamClass.java:1017)

at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readSerialData(ObjectInputStream.java:1893)

at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readOrdinaryObject(ObjectInputStream.java:1798)

at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readObject0(ObjectInputStream.java:1350)

at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readObject(ObjectInputStream.java:370)

at 
com.google.gwt.dev.javac.CompilationUnitArchive.createFromStream(CompilationUnitArchive.java:59)

at 
com.google.gwt.dev.javac.CompilationUnitArchive.createFromURL(CompilationUnitArchive.java:66)

at 
com.google.gwt.dev.ArchivePreloader.preloadArchives(ArchivePreloader.java:62)

at com.google.gwt.dev.Precompile.precompile(Precompile.java:246)

at com.google.gwt.dev.Precompile.precompile(Precompile.java:229)

at com.google.gwt.dev.Precompile.precompile(Precompile.java:145)

at com.google.gwt.dev.Compiler.run(Compiler.java:204)

at com.google.gwt.dev.Compiler.run(Compiler.java:156)

at com.google.gwt.dev.Compiler$1.run(Compiler.java:118)

at com.google.gwt.dev.CompileTaskRunner.doRun(CompileTaskRunner.java:55)

at 
com.google.gwt.dev.CompileTaskRunner.runWithAppropriateLogger(CompileTaskRunner.java:50)

at com.google.gwt.dev.Compiler.main(Compiler.java:125)

On Saturday, October 18, 2014 10:54:40 AM UTC-7, Daniel Kurka wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> since we are adding major features to GWT, we deci

[gwt-contrib] Change packaging for GSS

2014-10-18 Thread 'Daniel Kurka' via GWT Contributors

Hi all,

apparently we ended up packaging gss into gwt-dev instead of gwt-user:
https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/#/c/9803/

@Thomas, @Julien can you guys look into providing a patch that moves this
into gwt-user?

-Daniel

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT 
Contributors" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/CALLujipLY9ydhxTG0__D0vVojSpuCGQAmLb1aD-rPOBz1Me62A%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

[gwt-contrib] Java6 compatibility broken due to UiBinder change for GSS

2014-10-18 Thread 'Daniel Kurka' via GWT Contributors

Hi all,

currently GWT does not build with Java6 (not even the release build: ant
elemental dist), because of this change:
https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/#/c/9620/

@Colin, @Arthur can you guys take a look together with Julien?

-Daniel

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT 
Contributors" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/CALLujirju_SpP5kMJ4QG79skraX-xq9jynOB6JWHaCWeDqBenw%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

[gwt-contrib] Maven release process broken

2014-10-18 Thread 'Daniel Kurka' via GWT Contributors

Hi all,

apparently sonatype now verifies that all jar files have a sources.jar
associated with them. Our build does not do that for gwt-servlet.jar.

To be able to push out beta1 I settled on a nasty hack, see:
https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/#/c/9774/

I think we need to change the way the gwt-servlet.jar is build / we push
jars to maven.

@Thomas, @Manolo can you guys take a look?

-Daniel

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT 
Contributors" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/CALLujirZ64hyKNNur1sk%2BR7QsGW0QYYWRM1ro9z9PcOQDXUjqg%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

[gwt-contrib] GWT 2.7.0 beta1

2014-10-18 Thread 'Daniel Kurka' via GWT Contributors

Hi all,

since we are adding major features to GWT, we decided to change our release
process for GWT 2.7. I just published GWT 2.7.0-beta1 to maven central and our
file storage .
We are doing this beta to get external feedback on incremental compilation
and GSS.

Incremental compilation is now default with GWT 2.7 and replaces, together
with Super dev mode, the regular old dev mode. Inside of Google we are
already using it for a while now and most of the issues should have already
been dealt with, however we also want to make sure that external users that
might have slightly different use cases will have a working 2.7.0 release.

So please start testing with beta1 and give us lots of feedback on the
contributor
list

or on the issue tracker
. Please keep in
mind that we did not do any release testing on beta1, so there might be
issues that you do not expect from a release candidate.

Our current plan is to wait until the end of next week for any feedback. If
we do not find any serious external issues we will start the testing
process for an actual release candidate.

-Daniel

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT
Contributors" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/CALLujiraD7n4CS17O9YYhVt8BsJ4QFV83Z9qvAQDGpeyPxh2NA%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

[gwt-contrib] Re: Gwt Version Strategy

We could store version information in any jar manifest file using 
Implementation-* attributes:

Manifest-Version: 1.0
Ant-Version: Apache Ant 1.8.0
Created-By: 1.6.0_20-b02 (Sun Microsystems Inc.)
Implementation-Title: GWT User library / GWT Dev library / Elemental / ... 
/ 
Implementation-Version: 2.7.0
Implementation-Vendor: gwtproject.org

This can then be read in Java using 
classFromJar.getPackage().getImplementation[Title | Version | Vendor](). If 
all GWT jars would have that information you can choose whatever jar you 
like most.

-- J.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT 
Contributors" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/7ed9de96-462c-485e-8878-076b82579e67%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

[gwt-contrib] Gwt Version Strategy

Are there other gwt version options?

This depends on gwt-dev, would be nice to get this from gwt-user.

Class about = cl.loadClass("com.google.gwt.dev.About");
Method method = about.getMethod("getGwtVersionNum");
String versionStr = (String) method.invoke(null);

Thanks,
Brandon

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT 
Contributors" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/96ff0f84-9c7e-4ed4-ab0b-284f8219568b%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

[gwt-contrib] Re: Question to Windows users