Re: [gpc-informatics] #232: Q1 2015 QA exercise
#232: Q1 2015 QA exercise --+- Reporter: mish | Owner: mish Type: task | Status: closed Priority: major | Milestone: data-quality3 Component: data-quality | Resolution: fixed Keywords: data-quality | Blocked By: 159, 238, 262, 270 Blocking:| --+- Changes (by dconnolly): * cc: campbell, dconnolly, nateapathy, aaron.meyer@…, badagarla, bzschoche (removed) * cc: gpc-dev@… (added) * status: assigned = closed * resolution: = fixed Comment: Somehow I was under the impression that we owed a write-up on [[PMO]] milestone 2.6, but we already did that in #176. So the write-up is for our own purposes. I took a quick peek, and I see nothing wrong with your draft. Let's start looking at what to do for next quarter, perhaps focussing on CDM compliance (#240). As reporter, it's nominally up to you to judge whether this ticket is done (subject to appeal), but I'm going to optimistically presume you're happy with it. -- Ticket URL: http://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/trac/Project/ticket/232#comment:24 gpc-informatics http://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/ Greater Plains Network - Informatics ___ Gpc-dev mailing list Gpc-dev@listserv.kumc.edu http://listserv.kumc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gpc-dev
RE: [gpc-informatics] #232: Q1 2015 QA exercise
Reminder: materials for the Tuesday teleconference agenda are due at T-24hrs, i.e. 11am Monday. Recall from last weekhttp://listserv.kumc.edu/pipermail/gpc-dev/2015q1/001450.html: * ... http://listserv.kumc.edu/pipermail/gpc-dev/2015q1/001424.html * Q1 2015 Quality Queryhttp://listserv.kumc.edu/pipermail/gpc-dev/2015q1/001424.html * ... * Tom: OK; please everybody share such diffs/experience; perhaps it merits changes to GPC ontologies. * Dan: mid-April milestone due date sound OK? So sites need to do their part in the next week so we can review and write up the results on time. Tom: I expect ~1day work at each site, so don’t delay! * Jim M: can’t be sure UNMC has bandwidth for that timeline; HH on holiday this week. I see an experience report from UTHSCSAhttps://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/trac/Project/ticket/238#comment:11 and a few questions from other sites. So we're at 1 for 10, Tom? Or did I miss some? Or did they report experience privately? If anyone has experience they haven't shared with the group, NOW is the time. Anything from we have our results complete and we went to upload them but failed to log in to REDCap to we tried to run the query but all we got was a pile of syntax errors is welcome (though only one site, UNMC, said they didn't have bandwidth to spend up to one day working through syntax errors). But please don't wait 'till the teleconference to share your status. -- Dan From: Munns, Michael B [mike.mu...@unmc.edu] Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2015 9:53 AM To: Tom Mish; gpc-dev@listserv.kumc.edu; Dan Connolly Cc: Bhargav Adagarla; John Steinmetz Subject: RE: [gpc-informatics] #232: Q1 2015 QA exercise In the create script for the obesity active patients (Q1_2015_GPC_OBESITY_ACTIVE_PATIENTS) the where condition for the BMI part it has ” concept_path = '\GPC\Vital Signs\LOINC:39156-5\' “ We do not have the GPC metadata installed. We do have BMI under PCORI that does have facts. Can that be used instead? Should we download and install GPC metadata? Michael Munns Database Analyst 402-559-3821 From: gpc-dev-boun...@listserv.kumc.edu [mailto:gpc-dev-boun...@listserv.kumc.edu] On Behalf Of Tom Mish Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2015 8:15 AM To: gpc-dev@listserv.kumc.edu; dconno...@kumc.edu Cc: badaga...@kumc.edu; jsteinm...@kumc.edu Subject: Re: [gpc-informatics] #232: Q1 2015 QA exercise A new version of the query was updated. * Jim moved the comments/version history section to a separate document * The changes in this are to the output (variable names and ordering) produced to make it easier to import into redcap. -TM The information in this e-mail may be privileged and confidential, intended only for the use of the addressee(s) above. Any unauthorized use or disclosure of this information is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail by mistake, please delete it and immediately contact the sender. ___ Gpc-dev mailing list Gpc-dev@listserv.kumc.edu http://listserv.kumc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gpc-dev
Re: [gpc-informatics] #232: Q1 2015 QA exercise
A new version of the query was updated. * Jim moved the comments/version history section to a separate document * The changes in this are to the output (variable names and ordering) produced to make it easier to import into redcap. -TM ___ Gpc-dev mailing list Gpc-dev@listserv.kumc.edu http://listserv.kumc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gpc-dev
RE: [gpc-informatics] #232: Q1 2015 QA exercise
In the create script for the obesity active patients (Q1_2015_GPC_OBESITY_ACTIVE_PATIENTS) the where condition for the BMI part it has ” concept_path = '\GPC\Vital Signs\LOINC:39156-5\' “ We do not have the GPC metadata installed. We do have BMI under PCORI that does have facts. Can that be used instead? Should we download and install GPC metadata? Michael Munns Database Analyst 402-559-3821 From: gpc-dev-boun...@listserv.kumc.edu [mailto:gpc-dev-boun...@listserv.kumc.edu] On Behalf Of Tom Mish Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2015 8:15 AM To: gpc-dev@listserv.kumc.edu; dconno...@kumc.edu Cc: badaga...@kumc.edu; jsteinm...@kumc.edu Subject: Re: [gpc-informatics] #232: Q1 2015 QA exercise A new version of the query was updated. * Jim moved the comments/version history section to a separate document * The changes in this are to the output (variable names and ordering) produced to make it easier to import into redcap. -TM The information in this e-mail may be privileged and confidential, intended only for the use of the addressee(s) above. Any unauthorized use or disclosure of this information is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail by mistake, please delete it and immediately contact the sender. ___ Gpc-dev mailing list Gpc-dev@listserv.kumc.edu http://listserv.kumc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gpc-dev
