Re: [GRASS-dev] CLI!=GUI
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 10:49:05PM +0100, Martin Landa wrote: Hi, 2010/11/20 Paolo Cavallini cavall...@faunalia.it: I know it's an old thread, and that not everybody agrees, but I still think, after talking with people more knowledgeable than me, that separating the core of GRASS (libraries+CLI) from the GUI(s) will make the release and packaging process faster and smoother, and the integration with other software, both desktop and web, easier and cleaner. Can we revive the discussion about this? well, my option is very subjective - wxGUI is going to be a solid GUI for GRASS. Anyone can build it's own GRASS distribution without any GUI (libraries and subset of the GRASS modules). But it's not task for the core GRASS developers. They are creating solid environment --- GRASS libraries + modules (CLI) and also the GUI. Feel free to take what you what from this composition. Martin What Paolo is probably trying (also?) to say is that GUIs and core could have completely different release cycles. The GUI should be a component like any other, to be released when ready, but that should not become a permanent blocker of the release process, like did happen in the 6.4 release. Many people (like me and many other) use Grass as a scripting language and are completely uninterested in having a stable GUI at all, but are interested in having a working stable core in reasonable times. Of course, IMHO applies. -- Francesco P. Lovergine ___ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
[GRASS-dev] Re: ERROR: G_realloc: during r.to.vect call
Hi Markus I realized that I sent this email to the wrong mailing list. Here goes: I believe it's ok: projection: 1 (UTM) zone: -24 datum: wgs84 ellipsoid: wgs84 north: 9305500.0001 south: 9095770.0001 west: 444000 east: 689130 nsres: 30 ewres: 30 rows: 6991 cols: 8171 cells: 57123461 And my raster is: | Type of Map: raster Number of Categories: 3 | | Data Type: CELL | | Rows: 6991 | | Columns: 8171 | | Total Cells: 57123461 | |Projection: UTM (zone -24) | |N: 9305500.0001S: 9095770.0001 Res: 30 | |E: 689130W: 444000 Res: 30 | | Range of data:min = 0 max = 3 | So it matches. What might be causing this error/bug? Antonio Markus Neteler wrote: 2010/11/18 António Rocha antonio.rocha at deimos.com.pt: Greetings I'm running GRASS (in Windows) and, for a specific raster, when I try to run v.to.rast I get this error: ERROR: G_realloc: unable to allocate 3376 bytes at areas.c:678 1- Is this expectable? 2- is there any fix for this? If not, does anyone has any suggestion to avoid this error? Did you check the computation region with g.region -p ? Just to be sure that extent and resolution are right... Markus ___ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
Re: [GRASS-dev] Re: [GRASS GIS] #224: cache bug in DGLib
The problem was with 6.4.0, current 6.4 svn seems to work OK. Thanks Radim On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 2:29 PM, Markus Neteler nete...@osgeo.org wrote: Hi Radim, On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 1:48 PM, Radim Blazek radim.bla...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, what is the current situation with cache bug in dglib? I found that in 6.4.0 it is still buggy but it is enabled in Vlib/net.c, so all the net modules may give wrong results. Definitely if the cache is buggy it should not be enabled. Did you try with 6.4.0 or the (later fixed) 6.4.svn? If it still fails with the current 6.4.svn, do you have a test case? Ticket URL: https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ticket/224#comment:20 Markus ___ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
Re: [GRASS-dev] Re: [GRASS GIS] #224: cache bug in DGLib
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Radim Blazek radim.bla...@gmail.com wrote: The problem was with 6.4.0, current 6.4 svn seems to work OK. Good - sooner or later we need to get out 6.4.1. Markus ___ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
[GRASS-dev] GRASS6.4.1
Markus, would it be possible to prepare some plan / schedule for releasing 6.4.1? There are a few things that do not work in 6.4 but work in 6.5. Although we just got through a semester with GRASS6.4 without any major disaster, I got a more positive feedback from students using GRASS65 so obviously GRASS6.4.1 release would be welcome. It would be great to get some idea whether we should plan for installing GRASS6.4.1 for the next semester or stick with the current release. thanks a lot Helena On Nov 21, 2010, at 5:07 PM, Markus Neteler wrote: On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Radim Blazek radim.bla...@gmail.com wrote: The problem was with 6.4.0, current 6.4 svn seems to work OK. Good - sooner or later we need to get out 6.4.1. Markus ___ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev ___ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
