Re: [GRASS-user] Re: grass-user Digest, Vol 25, Issue 67
Hi, good idea - we could update ./rpm/suse from time to time. I don't have svn access for grass but I can send you the spec files, if you like. Who would be the contact person, I can send the files to? Would that be ok? Attached you find the current spec file and the patch which comments the wxpythion v.digit module for the grass 6.3. The same files are available in the /src folder via the Application:/Geo/ repository. It works for OpenSuSE 10.2, 10.3 and openSUSE_Factory. regards, Otto On Fri, 30 May 2008 23:01:26 -0700 (PDT) Hamish [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hamish: I do not know if the SuSE packages are build using the spec from the GRASS source code, but you could check the rpm/ source code dir and submit any fixes you have. http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/browser/grass/trunk/rpm Richard Chirgwin wrote: I think you may be flattering my expertise if you think I'm competent for source code fixes! :-) I don't think it's quite as hard as you might think- just to look at the text file and see what's there. Anyway I encourage all to explore it even if you are not comfortable with making too many changes. The package dependency part of the spec file seems fairly clear. e.g.: http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/browser/grass/trunk/rpm/suse/grass-6.1.cvs-1suse.spec Requires: gdal = 1.3 Requires: tcl = 8.3 Requires: tk = 8.3 Requires: proj = 4.4.9 adding another is just opening it up in a text editor and typing the line. But it is probably better to sync that with Otto's 6.3.0 version before doing any more, as the GRASS svn copy is way out of date. I should however say, wrt YaST on OpenSuSE, that it's very ignorant of Grass and only returns a very ancient version (5.0.3-120). Hmm, maybe someone could work on getting Otto's OpenSuSE packages into that. http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/Application:/Geo/ (no idea) Hamish ___ grass-user mailing list grass-user@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user --- grass-6.3.0/gui/wxpython/Makefile 2008-04-16 15:31:47.0 +0200 +++ grass-6.3.0_new/gui/wxpython/Makefile 2008-04-19 14:06:28.0 +0200 @@ -4,11 +4,11 @@ include $(MODULE_TOPDIR)/include/Make/Platform.make -ifneq ($(USE_WXWIDGETS),) - ifneq ($(USE_PYTHON),) -SUBDIRS += vdigit - endif -endif +#ifneq ($(USE_WXWIDGETS),) +# ifneq ($(USE_PYTHON),) +#SUBDIRS += vdigit +# endif +#endif include $(MODULE_TOPDIR)/include/Make/Dir.make grass.spec Description: Binary data ___ grass-user mailing list grass-user@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
Re: [GRASS-user] Re: grass-user Digest, Vol 25, Issue 67
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 11:42 AM, Otto Dassau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, good idea - we could update ./rpm/suse from time to time. I don't have svn access for grass but I can send you the spec files, if you like. Who would be the contact person, I can send the files to? Would that be ok? Attached you find the current spec file and the patch which comments the wxpythion v.digit module for the grass 6.3. The same files are available in the /src folder via the Application:/Geo/ repository. It works for OpenSuSE 10.2, 10.3 and openSUSE_Factory. ... submitted to 6.4.svn Markus ___ grass-user mailing list grass-user@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
Re: [GRASS-user] Re: grass-user Digest, Vol 25, Issue 67
Richard Chirgwin wrote: oops. I meant dependency management, not a Grass critique, a more general issue for Linux users ... I take it you've never tried Debian then ;) really the packaging is only as good as the spec/control file info, the same applies to the cygwin packages etc. Debian is so good at this not because the technology is behind the package management there is so good*, it is because the packaging rules are rather explicit, strict, and enforced. [*] it may be, but that's besides the point I do not know if the SuSE packages are build using the spec from the GRASS source code, but you could check the rpm/ source code dir and submit any fixes you have. http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/browser/grass/trunk/rpm Hamish ___ grass-user mailing list grass-user@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
Re: [GRASS-user] Re: grass-user Digest, Vol 25, Issue 67
Hamish wrote: Richard Chirgwin wrote: oops. I meant dependency management, not a Grass critique, a more general issue for Linux users ... I take it you've never tried Debian then ;) really the packaging is only as good as the spec/control file info, the same applies to the cygwin packages etc. Debian is so good at this not because the technology is behind the package management there is so good*, it is because the packaging rules are rather explicit, strict, and enforced. [*] it may be, but that's besides the point I do not know if the SuSE packages are build using the spec from the GRASS source code, but you could check the rpm/ source code dir and submit any fixes you have. http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/browser/grass/trunk/rpm Hamish I think you may be flattering my expertise if you think I'm competent for source code fixes! :-) I should however say, wrt YaST on OpenSuSE, that it's very ignorant of Grass and only returns a very ancient version (5.0.3-120). Rc ___ grass-user mailing list grass-user@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
