[GreenYouth] Re: Fwd: Media and the entrenched Patriarchy!!1

2009-07-19 Thread damodar prasad
*Maitree, an
organisation working for the rights of women, said it was “shocked” to
see the graphic on the front page of the paper “where you have
portrayed men from the administration in saris suggesting that their
inaction makes them women”.*
*“The implication, thereby, is clearly that women are inactive and
incompetent,” the letter said. “This is both a demeaning and
humiliating stance towards women and we are amazed that a leading
English daily holds such regressive attitudes and views.”
*
Suppose, the women administrators were attired in jeans and denim shirts, to
show the pro-active atttude,what would've been the reaction?


On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 9:25 AM, Venugopalan K M kmvenuan...@gmail.comwrote:


 -- Forwarded message --
 From: Rinita Mazumdar rinita_mazum...@yahoo.com
 Date: Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 5:49 AM
 Subject: Media and the entrenched Patriarchy!!1
 To: santhosh.chandrashe...@gmail.com, kmvenuan...@gmail.com,
 ckvishwan...@gmail.com


 Protests against Telegraph visual
 A STAFF REPORTER

 Calcutta, July 18: Two women’s organisations today protested against
 the publication of a graphic in The Telegraph that depicted the
 state’s top five administrators in saris.

 The visual accompanied a report about the state of inertia in the
 administration.

 In a letter handed over to The Telegraph today, Maitree, an
 organisation working for the rights of women, said it was “shocked” to
 see the graphic on the front page of the paper “where you have
 portrayed men from the administration in saris suggesting that their
 inaction makes them women”.

 “The implication, thereby, is clearly that women are inactive and
 incompetent,” the letter said. “This is both a demeaning and
 humiliating stance towards women and we are amazed that a leading
 English daily holds such regressive attitudes and views.”

 Before handing over the letter, members of Maitree staged a
 demonstration in front of The Telegraph office, demanding that the
 paper apologise.

 The Paschimbanga Ganatantrik Mahila Samity, a CPM-backed women’s
 organisation, said the visual “exposes very clearly the entrenched
 patriarchal attitude that lies hidden behind the apparently
 super-modern and liberal façade of your newspaper”.

 Referring to a sentence that accompanied the visual — “We apologise to
 women who may feel the elegant sari has been wasted on our
 administrators” — the organisation said that “it is, in fact, a crude
 mockery of women’s sense of seriousness of occasion”.

 Telegraph replies

 For some months now, Bengal has looked like a state without an
 administration. Friday’s bandh and the unchecked vandalism on its eve
 further demonstrated the lack of will on the administration’s part to
 enforce the law.

 In yesterday’s paper, the five top administrators were depicted as men
 in saris to illustrate the paralysis of government draped in humour.

 Some of our readers and others have taken affront, seeing in it an
 assumption that women are weak. It is possible some may have
 associated the administrators in the graphic with women, which was not
 the intention of the visual device at all. We are sorry if the graphic
 gave that impression.

 Some others have, however, expressed appreciation of the political
 message we sought to communicate and the humour.

 The Telegraph practises gender equality. It also believes that women
 have long grown beyond stereotypes as the weaker sex in saris. Sonia
 Gandhi and Mamata Banerjee are just two examples of women in positions
 of strength. There are a million other unknown women — in saris or
 business suits — in whose daily shows of strength we rejoice in the
 pages of our newspaper. We hope our readers will see the Gang of Five
 in Saris in that context.

 We also hope despite all its divisions, true to 19th century poet
 Ishwar Gupta’s words — Eto bhanga Bangadesh, tobu range bhara — Bengal
 still enjoys a good laugh.


 --
 http://venukm.blogspot.com

 http://www.shelfari.com/kmvenuannur

 http://kmvenuannur.livejournal.com

 


--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Green Youth Movement group.
 To post to this group, send email to greenyouth@googlegroups.com
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
greenyouth+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth?hl=en-GB
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[GreenYouth] Lalgarh Update

2009-07-19 Thread Sukla Sen
http://www.pressdisplay.com/pressdisplay/viewer.aspx

   - 19 Jul 2009
   - Times of India New Delhi Edition
   - Sukumar Mahato
   - TNN TNN

Maoists’ posters threaten to behead 9 CPM leaders

 Jhargram: A Maoist ‘people’s court’ on Saturday announced that nine CPM
members, including a prominent local leader, will be beheaded causing panic
across Jhargram town in troubled West Midnapore district of West Bengal.

Residents of Manikpara in Jhargram town woke up to see posters allegedly
pasted by Maoists on shops at Ramkrishna Bazar, which read: ‘‘ CPM netader
shighroi pantha boli dewa hobe (CPM leaders will be beheaded soon)’’. The
names of CPM’s West Midnapore district committee member Hiralal Mahato and
Manikpara local secretary Shatadal Mahato figured in the ‘death warrant’.

A Maoist ‘gana adalat’ (people’s court) held at Manikpara in Jhargram took
the decision describing it as CPI(Maoists’) day before West Bengal CM
Budhadeb Bhattacharjee’s visit to Purulia, Maoists trigerred a landmine
explosion on a railway track near Urma station. Police also recovered a
metal object wrapped with wire and a map of Bhattacharjee’s route to
Purulia. part of strategy to annihilate ‘people’s enemies.’ The development
has renewed fear among residents who had been feeling safe after security
personnel stepped into the area.

Soon after police removed all the posters from Ramkrishna Bazar, senior
district secretariat member Dahareswar Sen rushed to the spot to tell party
comrades, some of whom planning to desert CPM, not to get scared. He
expressed doubts whether these posters were put up by Maoists. ‘‘I think
it’s an attempt by opposition namely Congress and Trinamool Congress.
Maoists do not use such foul language though we are opposed to them in
theory and practice. We are not giving importance to such posters,’’ he
said.

Despite Sen’s assurance 30 CPM members from the surrounding villages quit
CPM. ‘‘We won’t be alive if we are with CPM,’’ said Tarapada Singh, a CPM
member from Barkola. Some villages like Dharampur and Bhulka are close to
the police camps set up after the security forces ‘freed’ Dharampur PS from
Maoists. Jhargram Congress general secretary Rajesh Mahato rubbished Sen’s
allegations. ‘‘We believe in non-violence. CPM leaders are bringing baseless
charges against our activists,’’ said Mahato.

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Green Youth Movement group.
 To post to this group, send email to greenyouth@googlegroups.com
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
greenyouth+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth?hl=en-GB
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[GreenYouth] -Reserved Past: De-reserving Future Ram Puniyani (fwd)

2009-07-19 Thread Venugopalan K M

--Reserved Past: De-reserving Future

Ram Puniyani

Reservation has been a big bone of contention in our society. Since
last two decades the issue has been expressed in subtle, direct and
indirect, forms. In popular psyche while some reservations are
desirable and good others are the one which are regarded as an
obstacle to social progress and some others are regarded as an
obstacle to national integration. Currently the one’s related to
Women’s reservation is regarded as being highly desirable, the one
relating to Dalit-OBC is thought of as cause of stagnation, obstacle
to progress and depriving the more meritorious upper castes from the
portals of opportunity, while the mere talk of reservation for
minorities is presented as dividing the nation.

Despite India coming out of colonial yoke, despite the democracy and
modern constitution being in place, the process of transformation of
caste and gender has remained half way through. The foundations of
these twin transformations were laid during the freedom movement, but
since forms of landlordism and hold of clergy continued in society,
the caste-gender transformation has not been completed. Nehru
expressed this to a French journalist, Andre Marloux, that a secular
constitution is there but country is gripped by deep religiosity. Our
Constitution makers took up the step of affirmative action for
dalits-adivasis, reserving seats for a stipulated period of time.
Since the implementation of these policies was in the hands of upper
caste, the proper implementation could not take place and the problem
lingered on, resulting in every succeeding government extending the
period of reservations, part of it was also motivated by electoral
compulsions. To add to this came the issue that reservations for these
groups were used by a few in the community, leading to creamy sections
fattening themselves and a larger sections remaining deprived of the
basic amenities and consequent dignity.

The process of urbanization resulted in the affluent middle classes
coming up and by 1980 they became assertive, and dead against the
reservations for dalit-OBC. They crystallized around RSS affiliates
and the result was the first major anti dalit violence in Ahmedabad in
1981, this was backed up by the one in 1986 against OBCs in Gujarat.
By this time women’s movement was picking up. From last more than a
decade women have been demanding their due in the social and political
sphere. The RSS support base saw the Mandal, reservation for OBCs, as
a big threat to their social status and rallied around Advani’s Rath
yatra. Mandal was to be countered by Kamamdal (politics in the name of
religion) as Atal Bihari Vajpayee put it. Kamandal spilled the blood
on the streets and the issue of reservation went to the back drop and
major assault now was directed against, minorities, First the Muslims
and the Christians, Pehle Kasai-Phir Isai, as their popular battle cry
put it.

With the severe security problems of minorities, the question of
equity remained in the background. The Muslim community as a matter of
fact went down on the social indices as pointed out by the Sachar
Committee. With declining economic indices the talk of reservation for
Muslims in education and jobs started coming up. But RSS affiliates,
working for a Hindu nation, essentially the one with hegemony of upper
caste males, struck hard by saying that any reservation for Muslims
will mean formation of another Pakistan. One can’t understand the
logic of the same, but one can surely understand the threat concealed
in this formulation. So now the compromised talk of Equal Opportunity
Commission, affirmative action for minorities and the formulation that
all steps short of reservation are to be thought-of, is going on. How
far Equal Opportunity Commission will achieve the purpose, if the
societal thinking is so hostile to the minority welfare, remains to be
seen?

During this time the Women, another major and deprived section, were
given reservation in Panchayats. This effort had all the merits but
some deeper flaws prevailed. One was that in most or many Panchayats,
where women were Sarpanchs (chief), their Husband or other male
relative practically controlled the scene. Despite this, women did
make some headway in the direction of empowerment. With this came the
demand of reservation for women in Parliament, the highest law making
body. Most of the political parties, including BJP, the one controlled
by RSS, so inherently believing in the birth based hierarchy of caste
and gender, supported it. The only opposition came from the OBC
dominated parties, for whom the caste inequality has been the central
concern of their politics.

Their argument is that at present mainly upper caste and affluent
women are in the social space so this move will tilt the caste balance
in favor of upper castes. So they say that there should be inbuilt sub
quota based on the basis of caste and minority. To say that women are
women, no inner differences 

[GreenYouth] Is employment of children as domestic and hotel workers really banned in India? - By Karthik Navayan

2009-07-19 Thread Karthik Navayan
 Dear Friends

Please read my article and feel free to comments on the same click the link
below

http://blog.insightyv.com/?p=370#more-370


Karthik
-- 
Battula Karthik Navayan,
Advocate,
H.No. 21-7-761,
Opp.High Court Post Office,
Gansi Bazar, Hyderabad,
PIN-52, AP.
Cell:09346677007,
email:nava...@gmail.com email%3anava...@gmail.com
http://karthiknavayan.blogspot.com/
http://www.orkut.co.in/Main#Profile.aspx?uid=10379805095932756525

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Green Youth Movement group.
 To post to this group, send email to greenyouth@googlegroups.com
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
greenyouth+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth?hl=en-GB
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[GreenYouth] (fwd)Article by Ratna Kapur; India: Wom en’s groups and feminists should be particularly encourage d by the Delhi court decision on section 377

2009-07-19 Thread Venugopalan K M

Courtesy to
South Asian Citizens Wire

http://www.sacw.net/article998.html

...Historically, women have been treated as weak, passive and
vulnerable and hence in need of protection, not equality. This
attitude continues to overwhelmingly inform laws that are ostensibly
adopted in women’s interests today, such as anti-trafficking laws and
policies or sexual harassment laws..

Ratna Kapur
 article

The Times of India, 8 July 2009

A Vision Correction

The Delhi high court judgement on Section 377 is nothing short of
historic, bold and revolutionary in ways that extend beyond the rights
of gays and lesbians. Section 377 penalises sodomy, an act for which
persons could be punished with death and burnt alive in late 13th
century Britain. In the contemporary period the specific provision has
been used primarily to target gay men as well as stretched at times to
include lesbian women. The court recognised the complaint by the
petitioner the Naaz Foundation, an NGO doing HIV work among sexually
stigmatised groups that the harassment, abuse and torture experienced
by gay men was seriously impeding work on HIV and AIDS.

But the decision was not driven merely by a concern about containing a
virus. It was driven by a commitment to the values enshrined in the
fundamental rights of the Indian Constitution that no person shall be
denied the rights to equality, freedom of expression, and life, on
grounds of sex. The high court decision moves boldly in the direction
that regards sex as including sexual orientation and sexual
preference. In other words, fundamental rights should not be
contingent on an individual’s sexual status or sexual conduct. This in
turn has important implications for women and other persons who choose
to live life in a manner that does not conform with dominant sexual,
cultural and familial norms.

For too long, sodomy has defined the homosexual, in the same way as
paid sex has defined the sex worker. And it is the sexual act that has
been incorporated and invariably criminalised in law. The fact that
gay men and women are workers, employers, mothers and fathers,
patients and clients, students and teachers, priests, pundits and
mullahs, has been marginalised. The striking down of the application
of the law opens the way for gays, lesbians, and many other sexual
subalterns to challenge discrimination in many areas of their lives on
grounds of sexual orientation and sexual identity.

The decision lays to rest the claim by the god squad and sexual
morality brigade that these practices are antagonistic to Indian
cultural values. Indeed, what is so apparent from the decision is that
Section 377 is a culturally specific law that emerged in Victorian
England and was transported to the colonies through the mechanism of
Empire. It was a provision that was designed to reinforce the view
that Indians and colonial subjects were sexually perverse and
uncivilised and hence undeserving of freedom. The colonial encounter
has left an egregious legacy of stigmatising sex and that legacy
persists in the present day. The decision affirms that gays, lesbians,
and other sexually stigmatised groups are Indian citizens, and belong
to an array of religious denominations and cultural communities. Their
sexual identity and cultural identity are integral and provisions that
force them to choose between one or the other are nothing short of
coercive state action that must be and has been in this instance
impugned.

A further area in which the court broke new ground is in recognising
the right to privacy as integral to the right to life. While the court
was able to build on previous case law in this area, this is the first
time that consensual sexual activity between two adults has been
considered to be a private matter. This has enormous implications
again for those individuals, gay and straight, who are engaged in
consensual sexual relationships outside of procreative, marital sex,
to ensure that the line is drawn in their favour. The state should not
be allowed to interfere in the private intimate space of individuals
in order to uphold its more absolute positions on what constitutes
’’good sex’’ and ’’bad sex’’.

Finally, the court’s remarks on equality also marked a significant
shift in the recognition of substantive equality, that is, that
equality should not be limited to sameness in treatment, but must
guarantee equality in result. Once again women will be direct
beneficiaries of such a shift. Equality has invariably been
interpreted as treating likes alike. The decision opens up space for
people to be treated differently in order to have equality in result,
to redress historical wrongs, and counter structural and systemic
discrimination on grounds of difference, in this instance, sexual
orientation or sexual preference. In other words, disadvantage rather
than distinction has quite appropriately been recognised as the core
attribute of the right to equality.

Women’s groups and feminists should be particularly 

[GreenYouth] Fwd: Excerpts: Comments by Kalpana Kannabiran on the Delhi HC Judgement On Sec 377,IPC

2009-07-19 Thread Venugopalan K M

Excerpt of Comments by Kalpana Kannabiran on the Delhi HC Judgement
On Sec 377,IPC in the Hindu article

India: From ’perversion’ to right to life with dignity

by Kalpana Kannabiran, 6 July 2009, the Hindu

...Perhaps the most important issue the judgment addresses is the
meaning of “sex” in Article 15(1) of the Constitution of India: “The
state shall not discriminate against any citizen on grounds only of
religion, race, caste, sex, place of birth or any of them.” Does the
term “sex” in this context refer to attribute or performance? Is sex
to be applied in a restricted fashion to gender or can the multiple
resonances of its common usage be taken into account, so that sex is
both gender (attribute) and sexual orientation (performance)? This is
particularly significant because, as the judgment demonstrates through
an extensive review of case law and principles from different parts of
the world, gender and sexual orientation are an intrinsic and
inalienable part of every human being; they are constituents of a
person’s identity. In the words of Justice Sachs of South Africa, the
constitution “acknowledges that people live in their bodies, their
communities, their cultures, their places and their times” (Sachs J.
in The National Coalition for Gay and Lesbian Equality v. The Minister
of Justice). It is this composite identity of every person that is
affirmed through a nuanced reading of “sex” in Article 15(1): “We hold
that sexual orientation is a ground analogous to sex and that
discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation is not permitted by
Article 15 (Para 104)...”

--
http://venukm.blogspot.com

http://www.shelfari.com/kmvenuannur

http://kmvenuannur.livejournal.com



-- 
http://venukm.blogspot.com

http://www.shelfari.com/kmvenuannur

http://kmvenuannur.livejournal.com

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Green Youth Movement group.
 To post to this group, send email to greenyouth@googlegroups.com
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
greenyouth+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth?hl=en-GB
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[GreenYouth] chinese flag ?????

2009-07-19 Thread Abdul Rasheed
Tuesday, January 20, 2009 ചൈനീസ് ഫ്ലാഗെന്നാല്‍ എന്താണ്
മുത്തശ്ശീ?http://workersforum.blogspot.com/2009/01/blog-post_8889.html
ജനുവരി - 9: സമ്മേളനത്തിനായി എത്തുന്ന മുഴുവന്‍ പ്രവര്‍ത്തകര്‍ക്കും
കൊടിയുണ്ടാകും. രണ്ടോ മൂന്നോ വലിയ കൊടികളും ബാക്കി ചൈനീസ് നിര്‍മിത കൊടികളുമാണ്
.''

-മലയാള മനോരമ.

മലയാള മനോരമയുടെ റിപ്പോര്‍ട്ട് ശരിയെങ്കില്‍ കൊച്ചിയിലെ റാലിക്ക് രണ്ടുലക്ഷം
കൊടികളെങ്കിലും ചൈനയില്‍നിന്നുവരുത്തണം സിപിഐ (എം). റാലിയില്‍ പങ്കെടുക്കുന്ന
എല്ലാവര്‍ക്കും കൊടിവേണമെന്നും ഒരു സംഘത്തില്‍ രണ്ടോ മൂന്നാ വലിയ കൊടികളും
ബാക്കി ചൈനയിലുണ്ടാക്കിയ ചെറിയ കൊടികളും ഉണ്ടാകണമെന്നും പാര്‍ടി സര്‍ക്കുലര്‍
ഇറക്കിയെന്ന വാര്‍ത്തയ്ക്ക് മറ്റെന്താണ് അര്‍ത്ഥം? റിപ്പോര്‍ട്ട് ശരിയെങ്കില്‍
പ്രശ്നം ഗുരുതരം.

പക്ഷേ, കാര്യം നിസ്സാരം എന്നതാണ് സത്യം.

പ്രകടനത്തില്‍ 'ചൈനീസ് ഫ്ലാഗു'കള്‍ പിടിക്കും എന്നറിഞ്ഞ മനോരമ
റിപ്പോര്‍ട്ടര്‍ക്കാണ് പിഴച്ചത്. ചൈനീസ് ഫ്ലാഗ് എന്നാല്‍ ചൈനയിലുണ്ടാക്കിയ
കൊടിയല്ലേ! മധുരം മലയാളം മുദ്രാവാക്യമാക്കിയ മനോരമയുടെ ഇംഗ്ളീഷ് മീഡിയം
ചിന്തപോയത് ആ വഴിക്കാവണം.

ചൈനീസ് ഫ്ലാഗെന്ന് നമ്മുടെ നാട്ടിലെ കമ്യൂണിസ്റ്റുകാര്‍ വിളിക്കുന്നത്
നെടുങ്ങനെയുള്ള ചുവന്ന കൊടിയെയാണ്. റാലിക്കെത്തുന്ന ഓരോ സംഘത്തിലും ഒന്നോ രണ്ടോ
പാര്‍ടിക്കൊടിയും ബാക്കി ചിഹ്നമില്ലാത്ത ചെറുകൊടികളും ഉണ്ടാകും എന്നു പറഞ്ഞു
കേട്ടതാണ് മനോരമയില്‍ ഇങ്ങനെയായത്. റാലിക്കു കൊണ്ടുവരുന്ന ചൈനീസ് ഫ്ലാഗുകള്‍
വയലാറിന്റെ കഥാപാത്രമായ 'നാല്‍ക്കവലയിലെ തയ്യല്‍ക്കടയിലെ ചാക്കോമേസ്തിരി'മാര്‍
തയ്ചെടുക്കുന്നതാണ്, ചൈനയില്‍നിന്നു വരുന്നതല്ല എന്ന് അവര്‍ക്ക് തിരിഞ്ഞില്ല.

പത്രപ്രവര്‍ത്തനം യൂണിവേഴ്സിറ്റികളില്‍നിന്നും അക്കാഡമികളില്‍നിന്നും
പഠിച്ചെടുക്കാവുന്നതും വിദേശസ്കോളര്‍ഷിപ്പുകളിലൂടെ ഇന്റര്‍നാഷണലൈസ്
ചെയ്യാവുന്നതുമായി മാറുമ്പോള്‍, നാട്ടുനടപ്പ് അറിയില്ലെങ്കിലും ചെയ്യാവുന്നതാണ്
എന്നു വരുമ്പോള്‍, ഇതും ഇതിലപ്പുറവും സംഭവിക്കും. നമ്മുടെ
മാധ്യമപ്രവര്‍ത്തനത്തിന്റെ ഈ വലിയ അപഭ്രംശം പുറത്തുകൊണ്ടുവന്ന മനോരമയുടെ
ചിരിപ്പിക്കുന്ന തെറ്റിന് നാട്ടറിവിന്റെ ചൈനീസ് ഫ്ലാഗുയര്‍ത്തി ഒരഭിവാദനം.

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Green Youth Movement group.
 To post to this group, send email to greenyouth@googlegroups.com
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
greenyouth+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth?hl=en-GB
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[GreenYouth] Re: chinese flag ?????

2009-07-19 Thread ranju radha
hey
nice one

but a secret.. this manorama reporter was  SFI/ DYFI activist during his
school/college days. Still he committed this mistake. (?!!)
that means even party classes are NOT enough to make one a true party worker
and a journalist.. shows the need for funding/fellowships/university
departments etc

Best

2009/7/19 Abdul Rasheed rasheed...@gmail.com

 Tuesday, January 20, 2009 ചൈനീസ് ഫ്ലാഗെന്നാല്‍ എന്താണ് 
 മുത്തശ്ശീ?http://workersforum.blogspot.com/2009/01/blog-post_8889.html
 ജനുവരി - 9: സമ്മേളനത്തിനായി എത്തുന്ന മുഴുവന്‍ പ്രവര്‍ത്തകര്‍ക്കും
 കൊടിയുണ്ടാകും. രണ്ടോ മൂന്നോ വലിയ കൊടികളും ബാക്കി ചൈനീസ് നിര്‍മിത കൊടികളുമാണ്
 .''

 -മലയാള മനോരമ.

 മലയാള മനോരമയുടെ റിപ്പോര്‍ട്ട് ശരിയെങ്കില്‍ കൊച്ചിയിലെ റാലിക്ക് രണ്ടുലക്ഷം
 കൊടികളെങ്കിലും ചൈനയില്‍നിന്നുവരുത്തണം സിപിഐ (എം). റാലിയില്‍ പങ്കെടുക്കുന്ന
 എല്ലാവര്‍ക്കും കൊടിവേണമെന്നും ഒരു സംഘത്തില്‍ രണ്ടോ മൂന്നാ വലിയ കൊടികളും
 ബാക്കി ചൈനയിലുണ്ടാക്കിയ ചെറിയ കൊടികളും ഉണ്ടാകണമെന്നും പാര്‍ടി സര്‍ക്കുലര്‍
 ഇറക്കിയെന്ന വാര്‍ത്തയ്ക്ക് മറ്റെന്താണ് അര്‍ത്ഥം? റിപ്പോര്‍ട്ട് ശരിയെങ്കില്‍
 പ്രശ്നം ഗുരുതരം.

 പക്ഷേ, കാര്യം നിസ്സാരം എന്നതാണ് സത്യം.

 പ്രകടനത്തില്‍ 'ചൈനീസ് ഫ്ലാഗു'കള്‍ പിടിക്കും എന്നറിഞ്ഞ മനോരമ
 റിപ്പോര്‍ട്ടര്‍ക്കാണ് പിഴച്ചത്. ചൈനീസ് ഫ്ലാഗ് എന്നാല്‍ ചൈനയിലുണ്ടാക്കിയ
 കൊടിയല്ലേ! മധുരം മലയാളം മുദ്രാവാക്യമാക്കിയ മനോരമയുടെ ഇംഗ്ളീഷ് മീഡിയം
 ചിന്തപോയത് ആ വഴിക്കാവണം.

 ചൈനീസ് ഫ്ലാഗെന്ന് നമ്മുടെ നാട്ടിലെ കമ്യൂണിസ്റ്റുകാര്‍ വിളിക്കുന്നത്
 നെടുങ്ങനെയുള്ള ചുവന്ന കൊടിയെയാണ്. റാലിക്കെത്തുന്ന ഓരോ സംഘത്തിലും ഒന്നോ രണ്ടോ
 പാര്‍ടിക്കൊടിയും ബാക്കി ചിഹ്നമില്ലാത്ത ചെറുകൊടികളും ഉണ്ടാകും എന്നു പറഞ്ഞു
 കേട്ടതാണ് മനോരമയില്‍ ഇങ്ങനെയായത്. റാലിക്കു കൊണ്ടുവരുന്ന ചൈനീസ് ഫ്ലാഗുകള്‍
 വയലാറിന്റെ കഥാപാത്രമായ 'നാല്‍ക്കവലയിലെ തയ്യല്‍ക്കടയിലെ ചാക്കോമേസ്തിരി'മാര്‍
 തയ്ചെടുക്കുന്നതാണ്, ചൈനയില്‍നിന്നു വരുന്നതല്ല എന്ന് അവര്‍ക്ക് തിരിഞ്ഞില്ല.

 പത്രപ്രവര്‍ത്തനം യൂണിവേഴ്സിറ്റികളില്‍നിന്നും അക്കാഡമികളില്‍നിന്നും
 പഠിച്ചെടുക്കാവുന്നതും വിദേശസ്കോളര്‍ഷിപ്പുകളിലൂടെ ഇന്റര്‍നാഷണലൈസ്
 ചെയ്യാവുന്നതുമായി മാറുമ്പോള്‍, നാട്ടുനടപ്പ് അറിയില്ലെങ്കിലും ചെയ്യാവുന്നതാണ്
 എന്നു വരുമ്പോള്‍, ഇതും ഇതിലപ്പുറവും സംഭവിക്കും. നമ്മുടെ
 മാധ്യമപ്രവര്‍ത്തനത്തിന്റെ ഈ വലിയ അപഭ്രംശം പുറത്തുകൊണ്ടുവന്ന മനോരമയുടെ
 ചിരിപ്പിക്കുന്ന തെറ്റിന് നാട്ടറിവിന്റെ ചൈനീസ് ഫ്ലാഗുയര്‍ത്തി ഒരഭിവാദനം.

 



-- 
 The so called caste-hindus are bitterly opposed to the depressed class
using a public tank not because they really believe that the water will be
thereby spoiled or will evaporate but because they are afraid of losing
their superiority of caste and of equality being established between the
former and the latter. We are resorting to this satyagraha not becasue we
believe that the water of this particular tank has any exceptional
qualities, but to establish our natural rights as citizens and human
beings.

- Dr B.R. Ambedkar, Mahad Satyagraha Conference, December 25th , 1927

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Green Youth Movement group.
 To post to this group, send email to greenyouth@googlegroups.com
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
greenyouth+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth?hl=en-GB
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[GreenYouth] Re: chinese flag ?????

2009-07-19 Thread Sebin Jacob
2009/7/20 ranju radha ranjura...@gmail.com

 hey
 nice one

 but a secret.. this manorama reporter was  SFI/ DYFI activist during his
 school/college days. Still he committed this mistake. (?!!)


How could you vouch for that? Are you the omnipotent, omniscient,
omnipresent one?


-- 
Understanding is a three-edged sword: your side, their side, and the truth

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Green Youth Movement group.
 To post to this group, send email to greenyouth@googlegroups.com
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
greenyouth+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth?hl=en-GB
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[GreenYouth] Fwd: [Citizen-Mumbai] Press Conference against illegal arrest - Press Club, 21st July, 4.30pm

2009-07-19 Thread Sukla Sen
From: Feroze Mithiborwala feroze.moses...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 10:44 AM
Subject: [Citizen-Mumbai] Press Conference against illegal arrest - Press
Club, 21st July, 4.30pm



Citizens' Initiative for Peace



To

The City Editor,
--
--

*SUB:* PRESS CONFERENCE

Dear Sir / Madam

The Citizens' Initiative for Peace (CIP) has organised a press conference
on Tuesday, July 21,  2009, at 4.30 P.M. at the Press Club (next to Azad
Maidan) to highlight the issue of grossly undemocratic arrest and detention
of Feroze Mithiborwala, Kishor Jagtap and Aslam Ghazi.

They were picked up by the Mumbai Police on Friday evening without
indicating any ground whatever and kept in respective police stations for
over 20 hours. Their arrests are, by all appearance, linked to the visit of
the US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to the city - in an apparent bid
to scuttle any possible protests.

The press conference will be addressed by Adv. Gayatri Singh. She had
visited the MIDC police station for the legal defence of Feroze Mithiborwala
and Kishor Jagtap and effect their early release. She will explain ithe
legal dimensions of these preventive arrests, without any specific charge,
in the broader context of Indian legal regime. It will also be addressed by
Feroze Mithiborwala, Kishor Jagtap and Aslam Ghazi. They will narrate their
own experiences.

Veteran Journalist and *Loksatta* Editor  *Shri *Kumar Ketkar would speak on
the implications of such arrests on India's democratic credentials and
prospects.Customary question and answer session would follow.

Please depute your reporter and photographer to cover the event and oblige.

Regards,

Dolphy D'souza Jatin DesaiSukla Sen
   (9322255812)

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Green Youth Movement group.
 To post to this group, send email to greenyouth@googlegroups.com
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
greenyouth+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth?hl=en-GB
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---