Re: [gmx-users] Can I get the fraction of solvent accessible surface area using "gmx sasa"?
I got it, Thank you very much for all the help! -- Original -- From: "ZHANG Cheng";<272699...@qq.com>; Date: Tue, Jan 16, 2018 08:46 PM To: "gromacs.org_gmx-users"; Subject: Re: Re: Re:Can I get the fraction of solvent accessible surface area using "gmx sasa"? Hi Justin, Thank you very much! The legend is "Total" for the command without -surface and -output. So I feel like if I do a division for the last columns from those two commands, I can just get the fraction of folded/unfolded? e.g. 1.467/2.767 1.824/2.757 1.901/2.736 ... ... -- Original -- From: "ZHANG Cheng";<272699...@qq.com>; Date: Tue, Jan 16, 2018 08:02 PM To: "gromacs.org_gmx-users" ; Subject: Re: Re:Can I get the fraction of solvent accessible surface area using "gmx sasa"? Hi Justin, Thank you very much. So I tried: gmx sasa -f md_0_1.xtc -s md_0_1.tpr -n index_C226S.ndx -o area.xvg -tu ns -surface 'group 0' -output 'group 1' And got: 0.000 206.8651.467 0.100 232.4501.824 0.200 225.9841.901 ... ... So my understanding is ) 1st column is the time ) 2nd column is the sasa of the whole protein ) 3rd column is the sasa of the particular group Thank you for that. But may I ask 1) if it is possible to calculate the fraction for a particular group in this way: (sasa of the state in the xtc file)/(sasa when that group is fully unfolded) Because a big buried residue may have similar sasa compared to a small exposed residue, so the "absolute" sasa of each residue could not reflect their buried extents individually. 2) When I do not use -surface and -output, but use echo: echo 1|gmx sasa -f md_0_1.xtc -s md_0_1.tpr -n index_C226S.ndx -o area.xvg -tu ns I got: 0.0002.767 0.1002.757 0.2002.736 ... ... Do you know what is the meaning of the second column? Thank you! -- Original -- From: "ZHANG Cheng";<272699...@qq.com>; Date: Tue, Jan 16, 2018 07:19 PM To: "gromacs.org_gmx-users" ; Subject: Re: Can I get the fraction of solvent accessible surface area using "gmx sasa"? Hi Alexandr, Thank you, but it is the same with spaces between | :( Cheng -- Original -- From: "ZHANG Cheng";<272699...@qq.com>; Date: Tue, Jan 16, 2018 06:37 PM To: "gromacs.org_gmx-users" ; Subject: Re:Re: Can I get the fraction of solvent accessible surface area using "gmx sasa"? Hi Justin, thank you very much. Sorry I still do not fully understand. I have an index file, in which the group 0 is all the residue atoms of the protein, group 1 is the first residue atoms. I want to calculate the sasa fraction of the residue 1. The fraction means: the sasa at folded state divided by the sasa when the residue is fully unfolded. So as you said, "two selections, one for the surface, the other for what is output". ) The manual says: "-surface should always consist of all non-solvent atoms in the system", so in my case it should be group 0, right? ) The manual also says: "-output can specify additional selections, which should be subsets of the calculation group", so in my case, it should be group 1, right? so I tried: echo 0 1|gmx sasa -f md_0_1.xtc -s md_0_1.tpr -n index_C226S.ndx -o area.xvg -tu ns -surface -output And got error message: Error in user input: Invalid selection '0 1 ' Near '1' syntax error I also tried "echo 1 0", and got the similar error: Error in user input: Invalid selection '1 0 ' Near '0' syntax error Can you please help me? Thank you very much! -- Original -- From: "ZHANG Cheng";<272699...@qq.com>; Date: Tue, Jan 16, 2018 04:52 AM To: "gromacs.org_gmx-users" ; Subject: Re: Can I get the fraction of solvent accessible surface area using "gmx sasa"? Thank you! So if I am using a index file, and the index 1 is the group I am interested, should I use the below? What is the difference between "-output" and "-o"? echo 1|gmx sasa -f md_0_1.xtc -s md_0_1.tpr -surface -output -n -o area.xvg -tu ns -- Original -- From: "ZHANG Cheng";<272699...@qq.com>; Date: Tue, Jan 16, 2018 02:50 AM To: "gromacs.org_gmx-users" ; Subject: Can I get the fraction of solvent accessible surface area using "gmx sasa"? Dear Gromacs, This website can give us the Q(SASA), i.e. the fraction of SASA per residue, with values from 0 to 1. https://mathbio.crick.ac.uk/wiki/POPS Can I ask if we can use "gmx sasa" to obtain similar information? I do not like the "absolute" sasa, as it could not reflect the relative exposure extent of a residue.
Re: [gmx-users] Can I get the fraction of solvent accessible surface area using "gmx sasa"?
On 1/16/18 7:46 AM, ZHANG Cheng wrote: Hi Justin, Thank you very much! The legend is "Total" for the command without -surface and -output. So I feel like if I do a division for the last columns from those two commands, I can just get the fraction of folded/unfolded? Strictly speaking, no, because you have artificial edges of that residue created by ignoring the fact that there are always residues flanking it. And you also have no guarantee that even in an "unfolded" state that this residue is 100% exposed to solvent. As an approximation, sure, but there is some level of error that may range from negligible to considerable, depending entirely upon the unfolded ensemble. -Justin e.g. 1.467/2.767 1.824/2.757 1.901/2.736 ... ... -- Original -- From: "ZHANG Cheng";<272699...@qq.com>; Date: Tue, Jan 16, 2018 08:02 PM To: "gromacs.org_gmx-users"; Subject: Re: Re:Can I get the fraction of solvent accessible surface area using "gmx sasa"? Hi Justin, Thank you very much. So I tried: gmx sasa -f md_0_1.xtc -s md_0_1.tpr -n index_C226S.ndx -o area.xvg -tu ns -surface 'group 0' -output 'group 1' And got: 0.000 206.8651.467 0.100 232.4501.824 0.200 225.9841.901 ... ... So my understanding is ) 1st column is the time ) 2nd column is the sasa of the whole protein ) 3rd column is the sasa of the particular group Thank you for that. But may I ask 1) if it is possible to calculate the fraction for a particular group in this way: (sasa of the state in the xtc file)/(sasa when that group is fully unfolded) Because a big buried residue may have similar sasa compared to a small exposed residue, so the "absolute" sasa of each residue could not reflect their buried extents individually. 2) When I do not use -surface and -output, but use echo: echo 1|gmx sasa -f md_0_1.xtc -s md_0_1.tpr -n index_C226S.ndx -o area.xvg -tu ns I got: 0.0002.767 0.1002.757 0.2002.736 ... ... Do you know what is the meaning of the second column? Thank you! -- Original -- From: "ZHANG Cheng";<272699...@qq.com>; Date: Tue, Jan 16, 2018 07:19 PM To: "gromacs.org_gmx-users" ; Subject: Re: Can I get the fraction of solvent accessible surface area using "gmx sasa"? Hi Alexandr, Thank you, but it is the same with spaces between | :( Cheng -- Original -- From: "ZHANG Cheng";<272699...@qq.com>; Date: Tue, Jan 16, 2018 06:37 PM To: "gromacs.org_gmx-users" ; Subject: Re:Re: Can I get the fraction of solvent accessible surface area using "gmx sasa"? Hi Justin, thank you very much. Sorry I still do not fully understand. I have an index file, in which the group 0 is all the residue atoms of the protein, group 1 is the first residue atoms. I want to calculate the sasa fraction of the residue 1. The fraction means: the sasa at folded state divided by the sasa when the residue is fully unfolded. So as you said, "two selections, one for the surface, the other for what is output". ) The manual says: "-surface should always consist of all non-solvent atoms in the system", so in my case it should be group 0, right? ) The manual also says: "-output can specify additional selections, which should be subsets of the calculation group", so in my case, it should be group 1, right? so I tried: echo 0 1|gmx sasa -f md_0_1.xtc -s md_0_1.tpr -n index_C226S.ndx -o area.xvg -tu ns -surface -output And got error message: Error in user input: Invalid selection '0 1 ' Near '1' syntax error I also tried "echo 1 0", and got the similar error: Error in user input: Invalid selection '1 0 ' Near '0' syntax error Can you please help me? Thank you very much! -- Original -- From: "ZHANG Cheng";<272699...@qq.com>; Date: Tue, Jan 16, 2018 04:52 AM To: "gromacs.org_gmx-users" ; Subject: Re: Can I get the fraction of solvent accessible surface area using "gmx sasa"? Thank you! So if I am using a index file, and the index 1 is the group I am interested, should I use the below? What is the difference between "-output" and "-o"? echo 1|gmx sasa -f md_0_1.xtc -s md_0_1.tpr -surface -output -n -o area.xvg -tu ns -- Original -- From: "ZHANG Cheng";<272699...@qq.com>; Date: Tue, Jan 16, 2018 02:50 AM To: "gromacs.org_gmx-users" ; Subject: Can I get the fraction of solvent accessible surface area using "gmx sasa"? Dear Gromacs, This website can give us the Q(SASA), i.e. the fraction of SASA per residue, with values from 0 to 1. https://mathbio.crick.ac.uk/wiki/POPS Can I ask if we can use "gmx sasa" to obtain
Re: [gmx-users] Can I get the fraction of solvent accessible surface area using "gmx sasa"?
Hi Justin, Thank you very much! The legend is "Total" for the command without -surface and -output. So I feel like if I do a division for the last columns from those two commands, I can just get the fraction of folded/unfolded? e.g. 1.467/2.767 1.824/2.757 1.901/2.736 ... ... -- Original -- From: "ZHANG Cheng";<272699...@qq.com>; Date: Tue, Jan 16, 2018 08:02 PM To: "gromacs.org_gmx-users"; Subject: Re: Re:Can I get the fraction of solvent accessible surface area using "gmx sasa"? Hi Justin, Thank you very much. So I tried: gmx sasa -f md_0_1.xtc -s md_0_1.tpr -n index_C226S.ndx -o area.xvg -tu ns -surface 'group 0' -output 'group 1' And got: 0.000 206.8651.467 0.100 232.4501.824 0.200 225.9841.901 ... ... So my understanding is ) 1st column is the time ) 2nd column is the sasa of the whole protein ) 3rd column is the sasa of the particular group Thank you for that. But may I ask 1) if it is possible to calculate the fraction for a particular group in this way: (sasa of the state in the xtc file)/(sasa when that group is fully unfolded) Because a big buried residue may have similar sasa compared to a small exposed residue, so the "absolute" sasa of each residue could not reflect their buried extents individually. 2) When I do not use -surface and -output, but use echo: echo 1|gmx sasa -f md_0_1.xtc -s md_0_1.tpr -n index_C226S.ndx -o area.xvg -tu ns I got: 0.0002.767 0.1002.757 0.2002.736 ... ... Do you know what is the meaning of the second column? Thank you! -- Original -- From: "ZHANG Cheng";<272699...@qq.com>; Date: Tue, Jan 16, 2018 07:19 PM To: "gromacs.org_gmx-users" ; Subject: Re: Can I get the fraction of solvent accessible surface area using "gmx sasa"? Hi Alexandr, Thank you, but it is the same with spaces between | :( Cheng -- Original -- From: "ZHANG Cheng";<272699...@qq.com>; Date: Tue, Jan 16, 2018 06:37 PM To: "gromacs.org_gmx-users" ; Subject: Re:Re: Can I get the fraction of solvent accessible surface area using "gmx sasa"? Hi Justin, thank you very much. Sorry I still do not fully understand. I have an index file, in which the group 0 is all the residue atoms of the protein, group 1 is the first residue atoms. I want to calculate the sasa fraction of the residue 1. The fraction means: the sasa at folded state divided by the sasa when the residue is fully unfolded. So as you said, "two selections, one for the surface, the other for what is output". ) The manual says: "-surface should always consist of all non-solvent atoms in the system", so in my case it should be group 0, right? ) The manual also says: "-output can specify additional selections, which should be subsets of the calculation group", so in my case, it should be group 1, right? so I tried: echo 0 1|gmx sasa -f md_0_1.xtc -s md_0_1.tpr -n index_C226S.ndx -o area.xvg -tu ns -surface -output And got error message: Error in user input: Invalid selection '0 1 ' Near '1' syntax error I also tried "echo 1 0", and got the similar error: Error in user input: Invalid selection '1 0 ' Near '0' syntax error Can you please help me? Thank you very much! -- Original -- From: "ZHANG Cheng";<272699...@qq.com>; Date: Tue, Jan 16, 2018 04:52 AM To: "gromacs.org_gmx-users" ; Subject: Re: Can I get the fraction of solvent accessible surface area using "gmx sasa"? Thank you! So if I am using a index file, and the index 1 is the group I am interested, should I use the below? What is the difference between "-output" and "-o"? echo 1|gmx sasa -f md_0_1.xtc -s md_0_1.tpr -surface -output -n -o area.xvg -tu ns -- Original -- From: "ZHANG Cheng";<272699...@qq.com>; Date: Tue, Jan 16, 2018 02:50 AM To: "gromacs.org_gmx-users" ; Subject: Can I get the fraction of solvent accessible surface area using "gmx sasa"? Dear Gromacs, This website can give us the Q(SASA), i.e. the fraction of SASA per residue, with values from 0 to 1. https://mathbio.crick.ac.uk/wiki/POPS Can I ask if we can use "gmx sasa" to obtain similar information? I do not like the "absolute" sasa, as it could not reflect the relative exposure extent of a residue. For example, a buried big residue may have similar sasa as an exposed small residue. Thank you. Yours sincerely Cheng -- Gromacs Users mailing list * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting! * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists * For (un)subscribe
Re: [gmx-users] Can I get the fraction of solvent accessible surface area using "gmx sasa"?
On 1/16/18 7:02 AM, ZHANG Cheng wrote: Hi Justin, Thank you very much. So I tried: gmx sasa -f md_0_1.xtc -s md_0_1.tpr -n index_C226S.ndx -o area.xvg -tu ns -surface 'group 0' -output 'group 1' And got: 0.000 206.8651.467 0.100 232.4501.824 0.200 225.9841.901 ... ... So my understanding is ) 1st column is the time ) 2nd column is the sasa of the whole protein ) 3rd column is the sasa of the particular group Thank you for that. But may I ask 1) if it is possible to calculate the fraction for a particular group in this way: (sasa of the state in the xtc file)/(sasa when that group is fully unfolded) Because a big buried residue may have similar sasa compared to a small exposed residue, so the "absolute" sasa of each residue could not reflect their buried extents individually. gmx sasa will compute the SASA of the chosen atoms in the supplied configuration(s). If you want to do further manipulations, you'll have to script that yourself as a post-processing task. 2) When I do not use -surface and -output, but use echo: echo 1|gmx sasa -f md_0_1.xtc -s md_0_1.tpr -n index_C226S.ndx -o area.xvg -tu ns I got: 0.0002.767 0.1002.757 0.2002.736 ... ... Do you know what is the meaning of the second column? It should be labeled in the header of the output file, but it's the SASA of the chosen group of atoms, in this instance assuming that the entire group is solvent-exposed (because you're not computing a full surface here, just the SASA of the chosen atoms). -Justin -- == Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Virginia Tech Department of Biochemistry 303 Engel Hall 340 West Campus Dr. Blacksburg, VA 24061 jalem...@vt.edu | (540) 231-3129 http://www.biochem.vt.edu/people/faculty/JustinLemkul.html == -- Gromacs Users mailing list * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting! * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists * For (un)subscribe requests visit https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Re: [gmx-users] Can I get the fraction of solvent accessible surface area using "gmx sasa"?
Hi Justin, Thank you very much. So I tried: gmx sasa -f md_0_1.xtc -s md_0_1.tpr -n index_C226S.ndx -o area.xvg -tu ns -surface 'group 0' -output 'group 1' And got: 0.000 206.8651.467 0.100 232.4501.824 0.200 225.9841.901 ... ... So my understanding is ) 1st column is the time ) 2nd column is the sasa of the whole protein ) 3rd column is the sasa of the particular group Thank you for that. But may I ask 1) if it is possible to calculate the fraction for a particular group in this way: (sasa of the state in the xtc file)/(sasa when that group is fully unfolded) Because a big buried residue may have similar sasa compared to a small exposed residue, so the "absolute" sasa of each residue could not reflect their buried extents individually. 2) When I do not use -surface and -output, but use echo: echo 1|gmx sasa -f md_0_1.xtc -s md_0_1.tpr -n index_C226S.ndx -o area.xvg -tu ns I got: 0.0002.767 0.1002.757 0.2002.736 ... ... Do you know what is the meaning of the second column? Thank you! -- Original -- From: "ZHANG Cheng";<272699...@qq.com>; Date: Tue, Jan 16, 2018 07:19 PM To: "gromacs.org_gmx-users"; Subject: Re: Can I get the fraction of solvent accessible surface area using "gmx sasa"? Hi Alexandr, Thank you, but it is the same with spaces between | :( Cheng -- Original -- From: "ZHANG Cheng";<272699...@qq.com>; Date: Tue, Jan 16, 2018 06:37 PM To: "gromacs.org_gmx-users" ; Subject: Re:Re: Can I get the fraction of solvent accessible surface area using "gmx sasa"? Hi Justin, thank you very much. Sorry I still do not fully understand. I have an index file, in which the group 0 is all the residue atoms of the protein, group 1 is the first residue atoms. I want to calculate the sasa fraction of the residue 1. The fraction means: the sasa at folded state divided by the sasa when the residue is fully unfolded. So as you said, "two selections, one for the surface, the other for what is output". ) The manual says: "-surface should always consist of all non-solvent atoms in the system", so in my case it should be group 0, right? ) The manual also says: "-output can specify additional selections, which should be subsets of the calculation group", so in my case, it should be group 1, right? so I tried: echo 0 1|gmx sasa -f md_0_1.xtc -s md_0_1.tpr -n index_C226S.ndx -o area.xvg -tu ns -surface -output And got error message: Error in user input: Invalid selection '0 1 ' Near '1' syntax error I also tried "echo 1 0", and got the similar error: Error in user input: Invalid selection '1 0 ' Near '0' syntax error Can you please help me? Thank you very much! -- Original -- From: "ZHANG Cheng";<272699...@qq.com>; Date: Tue, Jan 16, 2018 04:52 AM To: "gromacs.org_gmx-users" ; Subject: Re: Can I get the fraction of solvent accessible surface area using "gmx sasa"? Thank you! So if I am using a index file, and the index 1 is the group I am interested, should I use the below? What is the difference between "-output" and "-o"? echo 1|gmx sasa -f md_0_1.xtc -s md_0_1.tpr -surface -output -n -o area.xvg -tu ns -- Original -- From: "ZHANG Cheng";<272699...@qq.com>; Date: Tue, Jan 16, 2018 02:50 AM To: "gromacs.org_gmx-users" ; Subject: Can I get the fraction of solvent accessible surface area using "gmx sasa"? Dear Gromacs, This website can give us the Q(SASA), i.e. the fraction of SASA per residue, with values from 0 to 1. https://mathbio.crick.ac.uk/wiki/POPS Can I ask if we can use "gmx sasa" to obtain similar information? I do not like the "absolute" sasa, as it could not reflect the relative exposure extent of a residue. For example, a buried big residue may have similar sasa as an exposed small residue. Thank you. Yours sincerely Cheng -- Gromacs Users mailing list * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting! * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists * For (un)subscribe requests visit https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Re: [gmx-users] Can I get the fraction of solvent accessible surface area using "gmx sasa"?
On 1/16/18 6:19 AM, ZHANG Cheng wrote: Hi Alexandr, Thank you, but it is the same with spaces between | :( I provided the appropriate syntax before: http://manual.gromacs.org/documentation/2018-latest/user-guide/cmdline.html#g-sas -select and -output take strings that select what you want for each. Do that, not echo. -Justin Cheng -- Original -- From: "ZHANG Cheng";<272699...@qq.com>; Date: Tue, Jan 16, 2018 06:37 PM To: "gromacs.org_gmx-users"; Subject: Re:Re: Can I get the fraction of solvent accessible surface area using "gmx sasa"? Hi Justin, thank you very much. Sorry I still do not fully understand. I have an index file, in which the group 0 is all the residue atoms of the protein, group 1 is the first residue atoms. I want to calculate the sasa fraction of the residue 1. The fraction means: the sasa at folded state divided by the sasa when the residue is fully unfolded. So as you said, "two selections, one for the surface, the other for what is output". ) The manual says: "-surface should always consist of all non-solvent atoms in the system", so in my case it should be group 0, right? ) The manual also says: "-output can specify additional selections, which should be subsets of the calculation group", so in my case, it should be group 1, right? so I tried: echo 0 1|gmx sasa -f md_0_1.xtc -s md_0_1.tpr -n index_C226S.ndx -o area.xvg -tu ns -surface -output And got error message: Error in user input: Invalid selection '0 1 ' Near '1' syntax error I also tried "echo 1 0", and got the similar error: Error in user input: Invalid selection '1 0 ' Near '0' syntax error Can you please help me? Thank you very much! -- Original -- From: "ZHANG Cheng";<272699...@qq.com>; Date: Tue, Jan 16, 2018 04:52 AM To: "gromacs.org_gmx-users" ; Subject: Re: Can I get the fraction of solvent accessible surface area using "gmx sasa"? Thank you! So if I am using a index file, and the index 1 is the group I am interested, should I use the below? What is the difference between "-output" and "-o"? echo 1|gmx sasa -f md_0_1.xtc -s md_0_1.tpr -surface -output -n -o area.xvg -tu ns -- Original -- From: "ZHANG Cheng";<272699...@qq.com>; Date: Tue, Jan 16, 2018 02:50 AM To: "gromacs.org_gmx-users" ; Subject: Can I get the fraction of solvent accessible surface area using "gmx sasa"? Dear Gromacs, This website can give us the Q(SASA), i.e. the fraction of SASA per residue, with values from 0 to 1. https://mathbio.crick.ac.uk/wiki/POPS Can I ask if we can use "gmx sasa" to obtain similar information? I do not like the "absolute" sasa, as it could not reflect the relative exposure extent of a residue. For example, a buried big residue may have similar sasa as an exposed small residue. Thank you. Yours sincerely Cheng -- == Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Virginia Tech Department of Biochemistry 303 Engel Hall 340 West Campus Dr. Blacksburg, VA 24061 jalem...@vt.edu | (540) 231-3129 http://www.biochem.vt.edu/people/faculty/JustinLemkul.html == -- Gromacs Users mailing list * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting! * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists * For (un)subscribe requests visit https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Re: [gmx-users] Can I get the fraction of solvent accessible surface area using "gmx sasa"?
Hi Alexandr, Thank you, but it is the same with spaces between | :( Cheng -- Original -- From: "ZHANG Cheng";<272699...@qq.com>; Date: Tue, Jan 16, 2018 06:37 PM To: "gromacs.org_gmx-users"; Subject: Re:Re: Can I get the fraction of solvent accessible surface area using "gmx sasa"? Hi Justin, thank you very much. Sorry I still do not fully understand. I have an index file, in which the group 0 is all the residue atoms of the protein, group 1 is the first residue atoms. I want to calculate the sasa fraction of the residue 1. The fraction means: the sasa at folded state divided by the sasa when the residue is fully unfolded. So as you said, "two selections, one for the surface, the other for what is output". ) The manual says: "-surface should always consist of all non-solvent atoms in the system", so in my case it should be group 0, right? ) The manual also says: "-output can specify additional selections, which should be subsets of the calculation group", so in my case, it should be group 1, right? so I tried: echo 0 1|gmx sasa -f md_0_1.xtc -s md_0_1.tpr -n index_C226S.ndx -o area.xvg -tu ns -surface -output And got error message: Error in user input: Invalid selection '0 1 ' Near '1' syntax error I also tried "echo 1 0", and got the similar error: Error in user input: Invalid selection '1 0 ' Near '0' syntax error Can you please help me? Thank you very much! -- Original -- From: "ZHANG Cheng";<272699...@qq.com>; Date: Tue, Jan 16, 2018 04:52 AM To: "gromacs.org_gmx-users" ; Subject: Re: Can I get the fraction of solvent accessible surface area using "gmx sasa"? Thank you! So if I am using a index file, and the index 1 is the group I am interested, should I use the below? What is the difference between "-output" and "-o"? echo 1|gmx sasa -f md_0_1.xtc -s md_0_1.tpr -surface -output -n -o area.xvg -tu ns -- Original -- From: "ZHANG Cheng";<272699...@qq.com>; Date: Tue, Jan 16, 2018 02:50 AM To: "gromacs.org_gmx-users" ; Subject: Can I get the fraction of solvent accessible surface area using "gmx sasa"? Dear Gromacs, This website can give us the Q(SASA), i.e. the fraction of SASA per residue, with values from 0 to 1. https://mathbio.crick.ac.uk/wiki/POPS Can I ask if we can use "gmx sasa" to obtain similar information? I do not like the "absolute" sasa, as it could not reflect the relative exposure extent of a residue. For example, a buried big residue may have similar sasa as an exposed small residue. Thank you. Yours sincerely Cheng -- Gromacs Users mailing list * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting! * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists * For (un)subscribe requests visit https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Re: [gmx-users] Can I get the fraction of solvent accessible surface area using "gmx sasa"?
On 16/01/2018 11:37, ZHANG Cheng wrote: Hi Justin, thank you very much. Sorry I still do not fully understand. I have an index file, in which the group 0 is all the residue atoms of the protein, group 1 is the first residue atoms. I want to calculate the sasa fraction of the residue 1. The fraction means: the sasa at folded state divided by the sasa when the residue is fully unfolded. So as you said, "two selections, one for the surface, the other for what is output". ) The manual says: "-surface should always consist of all non-solvent atoms in the system", so in my case it should be group 0, right? ) The manual also says: "-output can specify additional selections, which should be subsets of the calculation group", so in my case, it should be group 1, right? so I tried: echo 0 1|gmx sasa -f md_0_1.xtc -s md_0_1.tpr -n index_C226S.ndx -o area.xvg -tu ns -surface -output Try to place spaces between '|' and other arguments: echo 0 1 | gmx sasa -f md_0_1.xtc -s md_0_1.tpr -n index_C226S.ndx -o area.xvg -tu ns -surface -output and see if it works. And got error message: Error in user input: Invalid selection '0 1 ' Near '1' syntax error I also tried "echo 1 0", and got the similar error: Error in user input: Invalid selection '1 0 ' Near '0' syntax error Can you please help me? Thank you very much! -- Original -- From: "ZHANG Cheng";<272699...@qq.com>; Date: Tue, Jan 16, 2018 04:52 AM To: "gromacs.org_gmx-users"; Subject: Re: Can I get the fraction of solvent accessible surface area using "gmx sasa"? Thank you! So if I am using a index file, and the index 1 is the group I am interested, should I use the below? What is the difference between "-output" and "-o"? echo 1|gmx sasa -f md_0_1.xtc -s md_0_1.tpr -surface -output -n -o area.xvg -tu ns -- Original -- From: "ZHANG Cheng";<272699...@qq.com>; Date: Tue, Jan 16, 2018 02:50 AM To: "gromacs.org_gmx-users" ; Subject: Can I get the fraction of solvent accessible surface area using "gmx sasa"? Dear Gromacs, This website can give us the Q(SASA), i.e. the fraction of SASA per residue, with values from 0 to 1. https://mathbio.crick.ac.uk/wiki/POPS Can I ask if we can use "gmx sasa" to obtain similar information? I do not like the "absolute" sasa, as it could not reflect the relative exposure extent of a residue. For example, a buried big residue may have similar sasa as an exposed small residue. Thank you. Yours sincerely Cheng -Alexandr -- Gromacs Users mailing list * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting! * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists * For (un)subscribe requests visit https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Re: [gmx-users] Can I get the fraction of solvent accessible surface area using "gmx sasa"?
Hi Justin, thank you very much. Sorry I still do not fully understand. I have an index file, in which the group 0 is all the residue atoms of the protein, group 1 is the first residue atoms. I want to calculate the sasa fraction of the residue 1. The fraction means: the sasa at folded state divided by the sasa when the residue is fully unfolded. So as you said, "two selections, one for the surface, the other for what is output". ) The manual says: "-surface should always consist of all non-solvent atoms in the system", so in my case it should be group 0, right? ) The manual also says: "-output can specify additional selections, which should be subsets of the calculation group", so in my case, it should be group 1, right? so I tried: echo 0 1|gmx sasa -f md_0_1.xtc -s md_0_1.tpr -n index_C226S.ndx -o area.xvg -tu ns -surface -output And got error message: Error in user input: Invalid selection '0 1 ' Near '1' syntax error I also tried "echo 1 0", and got the similar error: Error in user input: Invalid selection '1 0 ' Near '0' syntax error Can you please help me? Thank you very much! -- Original -- From: "ZHANG Cheng";<272699...@qq.com>; Date: Tue, Jan 16, 2018 04:52 AM To: "gromacs.org_gmx-users"; Subject: Re: Can I get the fraction of solvent accessible surface area using "gmx sasa"? Thank you! So if I am using a index file, and the index 1 is the group I am interested, should I use the below? What is the difference between "-output" and "-o"? echo 1|gmx sasa -f md_0_1.xtc -s md_0_1.tpr -surface -output -n -o area.xvg -tu ns -- Original -- From: "ZHANG Cheng";<272699...@qq.com>; Date: Tue, Jan 16, 2018 02:50 AM To: "gromacs.org_gmx-users" ; Subject: Can I get the fraction of solvent accessible surface area using "gmx sasa"? Dear Gromacs, This website can give us the Q(SASA), i.e. the fraction of SASA per residue, with values from 0 to 1. https://mathbio.crick.ac.uk/wiki/POPS Can I ask if we can use "gmx sasa" to obtain similar information? I do not like the "absolute" sasa, as it could not reflect the relative exposure extent of a residue. For example, a buried big residue may have similar sasa as an exposed small residue. Thank you. Yours sincerely Cheng -- Gromacs Users mailing list * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting! * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists * For (un)subscribe requests visit https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Re: [gmx-users] Can I get the fraction of solvent accessible surface area using "gmx sasa"?
On 1/15/18 3:52 PM, ZHANG Cheng wrote: Thank you! So if I am using a index file, and the index 1 is the group I am interested, should I use the below? What is the difference between "-output" and "-o"? -output is the group you select for output, -o is the file to which the data are written. Please read gmx help sasa if you're not clear what the options are doing. echo 1|gmx sasa -f md_0_1.xtc -s md_0_1.tpr -surface -output -n -o area.xvg -tu ns The command requires two selections, one for the surface, the other for what is output. See http://manual.gromacs.org/documentation/2018-latest/user-guide/cmdline.html#g-sas -Justin -- == Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Virginia Tech Department of Biochemistry 303 Engel Hall 340 West Campus Dr. Blacksburg, VA 24061 jalem...@vt.edu | (540) 231-3129 http://www.biochem.vt.edu/people/faculty/JustinLemkul.html == -- Gromacs Users mailing list * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting! * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists * For (un)subscribe requests visit https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Re: [gmx-users] Can I get the fraction of solvent accessible surface area using "gmx sasa"?
Thank you! So if I am using a index file, and the index 1 is the group I am interested, should I use the below? What is the difference between "-output" and "-o"? echo 1|gmx sasa -f md_0_1.xtc -s md_0_1.tpr -surface -output -n -o area.xvg -tu ns -- Original -- From: "ZHANG Cheng";<272699...@qq.com>; Date: Tue, Jan 16, 2018 02:50 AM To: "gromacs.org_gmx-users"; Subject: Can I get the fraction of solvent accessible surface area using "gmx sasa"? Dear Gromacs, This website can give us the Q(SASA), i.e. the fraction of SASA per residue, with values from 0 to 1. https://mathbio.crick.ac.uk/wiki/POPS Can I ask if we can use "gmx sasa" to obtain similar information? I do not like the "absolute" sasa, as it could not reflect the relative exposure extent of a residue. For example, a buried big residue may have similar sasa as an exposed small residue. Thank you. Yours sincerely Cheng -- Gromacs Users mailing list * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting! * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists * For (un)subscribe requests visit https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Re: [gmx-users] Can I get the fraction of solvent accessible surface area using "gmx sasa"?
On 1/15/18 1:50 PM, ZHANG Cheng wrote: Dear Gromacs, This website can give us the Q(SASA), i.e. the fraction of SASA per residue, with values from 0 to 1. https://mathbio.crick.ac.uk/wiki/POPS Can I ask if we can use "gmx sasa" to obtain similar information? I do not like the "absolute" sasa, as it could not reflect the relative exposure extent of a residue. For example, a buried big residue may have similar sasa as an exposed small residue. Yes, if you select the full surface as the calculation group and the residue(s) of interest as the output group, you can easily calculate the relative contribution to the surface. -Justin -- == Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Virginia Tech Department of Biochemistry 303 Engel Hall 340 West Campus Dr. Blacksburg, VA 24061 jalem...@vt.edu | (540) 231-3129 http://www.biochem.vt.edu/people/faculty/JustinLemkul.html == -- Gromacs Users mailing list * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting! * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists * For (un)subscribe requests visit https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a mail to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.