Re: g_io_scheduler_job_send_to_mainloop in another thread
Based on my review at gioscheduler.c, I assume that the g_io_scheduler_job_send_to_mainloop() can be called in another thread, notice that this function wait for job completion in the main loop (main thread), in this case blocking the calling thread. If you call g_io_scheduler_job_send_to_mainloop() at the main thread it might have deadlocking your application. Ardhan, --- kuleshovm...@gmail.com wrote: From: Alexander Kuleshov kuleshovm...@gmail.com To: gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org Subject: g_io_scheduler_job_send_to_mainloop in another thread Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 11:13:17 +0600 Hello, I have function that run in another thread them main gui. Can i call g_io_scheduler_job_send_to_mainloop from this fumction or we can call g_io_scheduler_job_send_to_mainloop only from main thread? Thank you ___ gtk-app-devel-list mailing list gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-app-devel-list _ Listen to KNAC, Hit the Home page and Tune In Live! --- http://www.knac.com ___ gtk-app-devel-list mailing list gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-app-devel-list
Re: Some questions about Gtk+3.0 2.90
On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 22:44 -0700, Ardhan Madras wrote: Why the application need to move to GTK+ 3 which still in development progress? because after gtk+ 2.24 is released, in parallel with gtk+ 3.0 this December, the 2.x branch goes into deep maintainance mode: no further releases will be done and only patches fixing critical bugs will be applied. gtk+ 3.0 is the next major version: new features will only be added there. this is the grace period when application developers can still influence the API and feature set of 3.x; after 3.0 has been released, the API and ABI guarantees come into effect and you'll have to wait until 4.x for another API/ABI break. obviously, distributions will still package gtk+ 2.0 for the foreseeable future, so you don't *have* to port your application *now*. ciao, Emmanuele. -- W: http://www.emmanuelebassi.name B: http://blogs.gnome.org/ebassi ___ gtk-app-devel-list mailing list gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-app-devel-list
Re: Some questions about Gtk+3.0 2.90
Why the application need to move to GTK+ 3 which still in development progress? Ardhan --- eba...@gmail.com wrote: From: Emmanuele Bassi eba...@gmail.com To: gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org Subject: Re: Some questions about Gtk+3.0 2.90 Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 13:28:25 +0100 On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 13:24 +0100, haithem rahmani wrote: I'm planning to move my application to gtk+3.0 2.90 so I've some questions about it: - Is it API compatible with gtk+2.0 ? no. - does it provide a working DirectFB backend ? no. ciao, Emmanuele. -- W: http://www.emmanuelebassi.name B: http://blogs.gnome.org/ebassi ___ gtk-app-devel-list mailing list gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-app-devel-list _ Listen to KNAC, Hit the Home page and Tune In Live! --- http://www.knac.com ___ gtk-app-devel-list mailing list gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-app-devel-list
Re: Colored Statusbar, ugly grip under win32
Ok, Version on my linux box: pkg-config --modversion gtk+-2.0 2.18.3 Version on win32 (ugli resize grip): gtk+-bundle_2.20.0-20100406_win32/components.list gettext-runtime-0.17-1 gettext-runtime-dev-0.17-1 glib_2.24.0-2_win32 glib-dev_2.24.0-2_win32 pkg-config_0.23-3_win32 pkg-config-dev_0.23-3_win32 atk_1.30.0-1_win32 atk-dev_1.30.0-1_win32 pango_1.28.0-1_win32 pango-dev_1.28.0-1_win32 cairo_1.8.10-3_win32 cairo-dev_1.8.10-3_win32 fontconfig_2.8.0-2_win32 fontconfig-dev_2.8.0-2_win32 expat_2.0.1-1_win32 expat-dev_2.0.1-1_win32 freetype_2.3.12-1_win32 freetype-dev_2.3.12-1_win32 libpng_1.4.0-1_win32 libpng-dev_1.4.0-1_win32 zlib_1.2.4-1_win32 zlib-dev_1.2.4-1_win32 gtk+_2.20.0-1_win32 gtk+-dev_2.20.0-1_win32 regards Arne ___ gtk-app-devel-list mailing list gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-app-devel-list
Re: Colored Statusbar, ugly grip under win32
Version on win32 (ugli resize grip): And the versions with the non-ugly resize grip? --tml ___ gtk-app-devel-list mailing list gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-app-devel-list