Re: GTK+INSTALLATION IN WINDOWS
I may not understand your problem, but have you tried MinGW? (www.mingw.org) It creates a linux style development environment, all the familiar tools, but builds your code as a windows program. I use it for my cross-platform code. Gtk+ binaries are available. take it easy walter From: Dov Grobgeld dov.grobg...@gmail.com To: AKSHAT MALTARE akshat.malt...@gmail.com Cc: gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org Sent: Sun, May 1, 2011 1:56:12 AM Subject: Re: GTK+INSTALLATION IN WINDOWS One way of doing this is as follows: - Cross compile for windows from Linux. E.g. on Fedora, this may be done by installing the mingw32* packages. - Install the cross compiled makensis package to create an installer for Windows under Linux. - Run the installer under Windows installing your application and all the gtk packages. You can refer to the SConstruct file and the nsis file of my program giv at: http://git.gnome.org/browse/giv Too see how I do it. Regards, Dov On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 00:39, AKSHAT MALTARE akshat.malt...@gmail.comwrote: RESPECTED SIR,MADAM, I am using gtk+ in my c,c++ code to develop a cross platform application and have created my gui using gtk+ in linux and now i just want to test those codes for windows.I had been trying to install gtk on windows from last two days but due to lack of details abt installation process i am unable to install it as I do not have much experience of using commands of windows so it would be very helpfull if you could tell us the step by step procedure of installing packages or reffer us some website where we could find it. thankyou ___ gtk-app-devel-list mailing list gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-app-devel-list ___ gtk-app-devel-list mailing list gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-app-devel-list ___ gtk-app-devel-list mailing list gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-app-devel-list
Re: GTK+INSTALLATION IN WINDOWS
Hi, so it would be very helpfull if you could tell us the step by step procedure of installing packages or reffer us some website where we could find it. the easiest way to do this is described here: http://www.gtkforums.com/viewtopic.php?t=8908 cheers michael ___ gtk-app-devel-list mailing list gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-app-devel-list
Re: new gtk-fortran binding
I also had to add the 2.24 and 3.x columns in there so I have continued the previous status from all other bindings. If anyone out there sees their binding is out of date, please let me know and I can update it accordingly: http://www.gtk.org/language-bindings.html 2.24 is also partially supported by the Ada (GtkAda) binding. Work is underway to support it fully, as well as 3.0. Arno ___ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
building and installing gobject-introspection
Dear sir (?) I am trying to build gobject introspection ! I am using a 10h Opteron , glibc2.13 gcc251 , glib2.29.2 gtk3.0.2 (previous glib-2.27.5-current , gtks 1.2 and 2.23? also 2.24 not working at moment but was working first go , after massage ) I have been building for some months now , and I am just comming up from a complete rebuild . I am sure I have built gobject-introspection 9.12 adequately previously , but !! I seem to have done something different in the build this time , although the system and libs are the same , any suggestions? Please find build logs for 9.12 and 10.8 attached . Yours sincerely B.S.J.W. Stephenson checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/ginstall -c checking whether build environment is sane... yes checking for a thread-safe mkdir -p... /usr/bin/mkdir -p checking for gawk... gawk checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes checking whether to enable maintainer-specific portions of Makefiles... no checking build system type... x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu checking host system type... x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu checking for Win32... no checking for gcc... gcc checking for C compiler default output file name... a.out checking whether the C compiler works... yes checking whether we are cross compiling... no checking for suffix of executables... checking for suffix of object files... o checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... yes checking whether gcc accepts -g... yes checking for gcc option to accept ISO C89... none needed checking for style of include used by make... GNU checking dependency style of gcc... gcc3 checking whether gcc and cc understand -c and -o together... yes checking for a sed that does not truncate output... /usr/bin/sed checking for grep that handles long lines and -e... /usr/bin/grep checking for egrep... /usr/bin/grep -E checking for fgrep... /usr/bin/grep -F checking for ld used by gcc... /usr/bin/ld checking if the linker (/usr/bin/ld) is GNU ld... yes checking for BSD- or MS-compatible name lister (nm)... /usr/bin/nm -B checking the name lister (/usr/bin/nm -B) interface... BSD nm checking whether ln -s works... yes checking the maximum length of command line arguments... 1572864 checking whether the shell understands some XSI constructs... yes checking whether the shell understands +=... no checking for /usr/bin/ld option to reload object files... -r checking for objdump... objdump checking how to recognize dependent libraries... pass_all checking for ar... ar checking for strip... strip checking for ranlib... ranlib checking command to parse /usr/bin/nm -B output from gcc object... ok checking how to run the C preprocessor... gcc -E checking for ANSI C header files... yes checking for sys/types.h... yes checking for sys/stat.h... yes checking for stdlib.h... yes checking for string.h... yes checking for memory.h... yes checking for strings.h... yes checking for inttypes.h... yes checking for stdint.h... yes checking for unistd.h... yes checking for dlfcn.h... yes checking for objdir... .libs checking if gcc supports -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions... no checking for gcc option to produce PIC... -fPIC -DPIC checking if gcc PIC flag -fPIC -DPIC works... yes checking if gcc static flag -static works... yes checking if gcc supports -c -o file.o... yes checking if gcc supports -c -o file.o... (cached) yes checking whether the gcc linker (/usr/bin/ld -m elf_x86_64) supports shared libraries... yes checking whether -lc should be explicitly linked in... no checking dynamic linker characteristics... GNU/Linux ld.so checking how to hardcode library paths into programs... immediate checking whether stripping libraries is possible... yes checking if libtool supports shared libraries... yes checking whether to build shared libraries... yes checking whether to build static libraries... yes checking for pkg-config... /usr/bin/pkg-config checking pkg-config is at least version 0.9.0... yes checking for flex... flex checking lex output file root... lex.yy checking lex library... -lfl checking whether yytext is a pointer... yes checking for bison... bison -y checking for dlopen in -ldl... yes checking for the suffix of shared libraries... .so checking for GLIB... yes checking for GOBJECT... yes checking for GIO... yes checking for GIO_UNIX... yes checking for CAIRO... yes checking for CAIRO_GOBJECT... yes checking for SCANNER... yes checking for FFI... yes checking size of char... 1 checking size of short... 2 checking size of int... 4 checking size of long... 8 checking for GIREPO... yes checking for gtkdoc-check... /usr/bin/gtkdoc-check checking for gtkdoc-rebase... /usr/bin/gtkdoc-rebase checking for gtkdoc-mkpdf... /usr/bin/gtkdoc-mkpdf checking whether to build gtk-doc documentation... no checking for ANSI C header files... (cached) yes checking fcntl.h usability... yes checking fcntl.h presence... yes checking for fcntl.h... yes checking for stdlib.h... (cached) yes checking for string.h... (cached) yes checking for an
Re: GTK+ team meeting, 2011-05-02
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 7:29 PM, Matthias Clasen matthias.cla...@gmail.com wrote: I think it is time for another GTK+ team meeting, to talk about 3.2 The meeting will be held in the #gtk-devel channel on irc.gnome.org, at 20:00 UTC[1]. I've started to put together an agenda at http://live.gnome.org/GTK+/Meetings Feel free to add more there. So, I messed up twice here. First, I was of course meaning May 3rd. Second, it turns out I have an appointment to go to tomorrow afternoon. So we can either move the meeting - an hour later than usual, ie 21:00 UTC - to Wednesday afternoon (though my time will be pretty much limited to an hour then) - move it out another week Opinions ? ___ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
Re: GTK+ team meeting, 2011-05-02
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Matthias Clasen matthias.cla...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 7:29 PM, Matthias Clasen matthias.cla...@gmail.com wrote: I think it is time for another GTK+ team meeting, to talk about 3.2 The meeting will be held in the #gtk-devel channel on irc.gnome.org, at 20:00 UTC[1]. I've started to put together an agenda at http://live.gnome.org/GTK+/Meetings Feel free to add more there. So, I messed up twice here. First, I was of course meaning May 3rd. Second, it turns out I have an appointment to go to tomorrow afternoon. So we can either move the meeting - an hour later than usual, ie 21:00 UTC - to Wednesday afternoon (though my time will be pretty much limited to an hour then) - move it out another week Opinions ? didn't get much feedback, but it appears that ebassi is out for tomorrow anyway, and moving to another weekday is probably going to cause more confusion, so lets move to the week after. I do not want to delay the discussion of the 3.2 items on the agenda too much though; maybe we can have some review and opinionating in bugzilla in the meantime ? So, consider the meeting rescheduled to 2011-05-10, 20:00 UTC ___ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
