Re: [Hampshire] pcworld southampton & linux

2009-08-11 Thread Vic

> To be best in class you have to do better than to be (in it's
> own words) "Basically it's a perky imitation of Apple's OSX
> look". That's just catch up, not moving forward.

I didn't say it was better; I just responded to your post :-

"I've never seen a Linux desktop to compare with OSX in any of its forms."

Being a fairly close replica, it does indeed compare with OSX - and
favourably at that. No-one said anything about beating it :-)

Vic.


-- 
Please post to: Hampshire@mailman.lug.org.uk
Web Interface: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire
LUG URL: http://www.hantslug.org.uk
--


Re: [Hampshire] pcworld southampton & linux

2009-08-11 Thread Hugo Mills
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 01:26:50PM +0100, Stephen Pelc wrote:
> This discussion about bashing Microsoft misses the point as I 
> see it. What movement there is away from Windows appears to be 
> towards Apple and OSX. From a user's point of view OSX is both 
> easy to use and beautiful.

   Speaking entirely personally, I find the desktop on my MacBook (a
work machine) utterly frustrating. There are so many things I want to
do that are difficult, non-obvious, or Just Plain Impossible that I
can last about half a day trying to do work on it before I just want
to throw the whole machine out of a window.

   I'm sure many other people have utterly different views on the
subject, and I'm not saying that one size fits all, but for me, my
experience of OS X has been poor. I won't be buying an Apple machine
in the future.

   Hugo.

-- 
=== Hugo Mills: h...@... carfax.org.uk | darksatanic.net | lug.org.uk ===
  PGP key: 515C238D from wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net or http://www.carfax.org.uk
  --- Is a diversity twice as good as a university? ---  


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- 
Please post to: Hampshire@mailman.lug.org.uk
Web Interface: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire
LUG URL: http://www.hantslug.org.uk
--

Re: [Hampshire] pcworld southampton & linux

2009-08-11 Thread Stephen Pelc
John said:

> If you lock down Linux to a limited amount of packages and charge ?1000
> to ?2000 a box you will very quickly match OSX for looks and usability.
> But Linux isn't locked down, you are free to choose what the GUI looks
> like and what distro/packages you install. The EEE PC has shown how easy
> it is to get Linux usable for the masses and at ?250. Imagine what it
> would be like at ?2000!

My Mac Mini was £499, and I think the low end one is £399. I've 
seen net prices down around the £250 mark this year. Sure it's 
not the hot Apple product of the moment, but it "just works" and 
the build quality is fantastic. And yes, we have an eeePC as 
well - after a week we replaced the Xandros distro with the 
Ubuntu Eee version. 

Stephen



-- 
Stephen Pelc, step...@mpeforth.com
MicroProcessor Engineering Ltd - More Real, Less Time
133 Hill Lane, Southampton SO15 5AF, England
tel: +44 (0)23 8063 1441, fax: +44 (0)23 8033 9691
web: http://www.mpeforth.com - free VFX Forth downloads


-- 
Please post to: Hampshire@mailman.lug.org.uk
Web Interface: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire
LUG URL: http://www.hantslug.org.uk
--


Re: [Hampshire] pcworld southampton & linux

2009-08-11 Thread Stephen Pelc
Vic said:

> > I've never seen a Linux
> > desktop to compare with OSX in any of its forms.
> 
> Then you haven't seen baghira.
> 
> http://baghira.sourceforge.net/screenies.php

To be best in class you have to do better than to be (in it's 
own words) "Basically it's a perky imitation of Apple's OSX 
look". That's just catch up, not moving forward.

"Imitation is the sicerest form of flattery" - Oscar Wilde.

Stephen
-- 
Stephen Pelc, step...@mpeforth.com
MicroProcessor Engineering Ltd - More Real, Less Time
133 Hill Lane, Southampton SO15 5AF, England
tel: +44 (0)23 8063 1441, fax: +44 (0)23 8033 9691
web: http://www.mpeforth.com - free VFX Forth downloads


-- 
Please post to: Hampshire@mailman.lug.org.uk
Web Interface: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire
LUG URL: http://www.hantslug.org.uk
--


Re: [Hampshire] pcworld southampton & linux

2009-08-10 Thread John Cooper
>> On Mon, 10 Aug 2009 13:26:50 +0100
>> "Stephen Pelc"  wrote:
>> I've never seen a Linux
>> desktop to compare with OSX in any of its forms.
> 
> Then you haven't seen baghira.
> 
> http://baghira.sourceforge.net/screenies.php
> 
> Vic.
> 
> 
If you lock down Linux to a limited amount of packages and charge £1000
to £2000 a box you will very quickly match OSX for looks and usability.
But Linux isn't locked down, you are free to choose what the GUI looks
like and what distro/packages you install. The EEE PC has shown how easy
it is to get Linux usable for the masses and at £250. Imagine what it
would be like at £2000!

OSX is a great OS and GUI but it is expensive and limited compared to
Linux and its vast number of applications.

John.

-- 
--
Discover Linux - Open Source Solutions to Business and Schools
http://discoverlinux.co.uk
--

-- 
Please post to: Hampshire@mailman.lug.org.uk
Web Interface: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire
LUG URL: http://www.hantslug.org.uk
--


Re: [Hampshire] pcworld southampton & linux

2009-08-10 Thread Vic

> I've never seen a Linux
> desktop to compare with OSX in any of its forms.

Then you haven't seen baghira.

http://baghira.sourceforge.net/screenies.php

Vic.


-- 
Please post to: Hampshire@mailman.lug.org.uk
Web Interface: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire
LUG URL: http://www.hantslug.org.uk
--


Re: [Hampshire] pcworld southampton & linux

2009-08-10 Thread john lewis
On Mon, 10 Aug 2009 13:26:50 +0100
"Stephen Pelc"  wrote:

> IMHO, it's far more productive to look at best-in-class examples 
> than to knock the worst examples. I've never seen a Linux 
> desktop to compare with OSX in any of its forms.

beauty is in the eye of the beholder

I just googled for some images of OSX desktops (since I have never
seen one in real life) and good looking it may be but it has a thingy
at top and bottom of screen and icons all over

I don't like any of these things and much prefer my almost
icon free, no 'thingies' windowmaker desktop, though I have
added a 'Lord of the Swirls' background image to jazz it up  

-- 
John Lewis
using Debian Sid with windowmaker for a nicer desktop

-- 
Please post to: Hampshire@mailman.lug.org.uk
Web Interface: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire
LUG URL: http://www.hantslug.org.uk
--


Re: [Hampshire] pcworld southampton & linux

2009-08-10 Thread pavithran
2009/8/10 Stephen Davies :

> As far a Linux goes, these days the only issues I see with Hardware 
> Compatability is Wireless.

+1

I haven't played with many hardwares but personally I faced almost
hell thanks to Ralink which produces rt2860 wireless which
unfortunately ended up in my EEE 901 .  I agree that the wireless
works perfect in 2.6.26  on debian and definitely would would work on
Ubuntu,mandriva etc .
In my case I am using 2.6.30 and the driver wouldn't work . This is
actually a reported bug but it kind of works with 30 kernel with some
minor hacks and a non free driver :(
http://wiki.debian.org/rt2860sta#issues

I just wish/dream that some one from intel/ralink is watching that
page or this mail :)

Regards,
Pavithran




-- 
pavithran sakamuri
www.pavithran.org

-- 
Please post to: Hampshire@mailman.lug.org.uk
Web Interface: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire
LUG URL: http://www.hantslug.org.uk
--


Re: [Hampshire] pcworld southampton & linux

2009-08-10 Thread alan c
john wrote:
> Hi All
> 
> I could not resist the itch to say something.
> 
> More than once the use of Microsoft software has save my bacon.
> 
> I have the greatest respect for the windows system provided it has
> no contact with the Internet.  I have seen well

[...]

As you may be aware, one reason to use a foss alternative to Windows
is not in any way a technical nor a functional reason.

There are strong social, economic and even political (small p I think)
reasons, mostly associated with freedom - of choice and of information.

The freedoms are arguably worth something. Many people have
engaged in countless conflicts over the ages in the name of their
freedom in different forms.

The convenient option or even the best technical or functional
option, may not always offer the best long term option in light of
the consequences.

An Engineering viewpoint  seeks to eliminate factors other than
technical ones. Freedom is not an engineering factor.
-- 
alan cocks
Ubuntu user

-- 
Please post to: Hampshire@mailman.lug.org.uk
Web Interface: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire
LUG URL: http://www.hantslug.org.uk
--


Re: [Hampshire] pcworld southampton & linux

2009-08-10 Thread Stephen Davies
Quote from john Eayrs

I can load a new bit of hardware and drivers on windows with no problem.  A 
piece of hard ware for linux well thats a search on the Internet to find out 
if its is compatible and how to get it to install.

End quote

Well, on the other hand, I don't have to mess about for hours with Linux when I 
connect up a Canon EIDE60 scanner and a Nikon Coolscan 4000 at the same time 
(both USB drives)
On Windows, the Canon driver assumes that you are never doing to use any other 
device on that copy of Windows. Without deleting the multitude of files by hand 
you ain't going to get the Nikon (or any other Scanner for that matter to 
work). Windows + Canon Scanner software === Defective by Design.

Then there is printing... The Epson 2100 driver for Windows won't let me 
configure a custom paper size for a 5ftx8in panorama despite the paper being 
one of those produced by Epson themselves.. Move the file to Linux, connect up 
the printer and a few screens leater & CUPS is configures and I was able to 
print it without problem.
I could go on but I think you get the point.

As far a Linux goes, these days the only issues I see with Hardware 
Compatability is Wireless. We all know bout Broadcom but these days, if you 
look in 'dmesg' you see the link needed to get the Firmware so that is a less 
on an issue. Now the only crap driver I have to deal with is for a Realtek 
Wireless chip on my MSI Wind but that is solvable.
Obviously, your experience might well be different but IMHO, hardware detection 
& support in Linux is FAR FAR better than for Windows especially with the lack 
of support for many 4 yr old devices in Vista & Windows 7.

Stephen D







-- 
Please post to: Hampshire@mailman.lug.org.uk
Web Interface: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire
LUG URL: http://www.hantslug.org.uk
--


Re: [Hampshire] pcworld southampton & linux

2009-08-10 Thread Stephen Pelc
John said

> More than once the use of Microsoft software has save my bacon.

This discussion about bashing Microsoft misses the point as I 
see it. What movement there is away from Windows appears to be 
towards Apple and OSX. From a user's point of view OSX is both 
easy to use and beautiful.

English is the current lingua franca of the world. It is neither 
easy to use nor beautiful on most occasions. It just is the 
common denominator. Currently, Windows has that place on the 
desktop. It may well be different some time in the future.

IMHO, it's far more productive to look at best-in-class examples 
than to knock the worst examples. I've never seen a Linux 
desktop to compare with OSX in any of its forms.

Stephen
-- 
Stephen Pelc, step...@mpeforth.com
MicroProcessor Engineering Ltd - More Real, Less Time
133 Hill Lane, Southampton SO15 5AF, England
tel: +44 (0)23 8063 1441, fax: +44 (0)23 8033 9691
web: http://www.mpeforth.com - free VFX Forth downloads


-- 
Please post to: Hampshire@mailman.lug.org.uk
Web Interface: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire
LUG URL: http://www.hantslug.org.uk
--


Re: [Hampshire] pcworld southampton & linux

2009-08-09 Thread Jacqui Caren
>> I can load a new bit of hardware and drivers on windows with no problem.
> Yep, So can I.

Example1
My graphics tablet required two windows reboots to install the drivers!
On three different linux live distros and my Mandy desktop I simply plugged
it in and it worked in parrallel with the mouse.

I had the same issue with my trackballs and Nb utton mice.
Windows was a multple reboot - linux was just plug and go!

Example2
Regarding windows just working we had a problem with SQLSvr.
It was supposed to be raid compatible however this is only for a limited
number of raid cards - you buy a specific high end (>400UKP) card and you
end up with a corrupt database and/or random gibberish results.

Support finally admitted that the card was not SSsvr certified - and that
unless the NTFS "driver chain" is "fully compliant" (through to the hardware
drivers) and disks! then SSvr "could have issues".

The only other database I know of that binds so hard to the underlying
filesystem drivers is Oracle when running in raw disk mode...

So, SSvr binds to low level NTFS API's not accessible to the competition
and while Sybase,Postgres,Oracle et.al have no probs with the card SSvr
quietly, invisibly trashes your data!

Jacqui

-- 
Please post to: Hampshire@mailman.lug.org.uk
Web Interface: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire
LUG URL: http://www.hantslug.org.uk
--


Re: [Hampshire] pcworld southampton & linux

2009-08-09 Thread Vic

> I have the greatest respect for the windows system provided it has no
> contact
> with the Internet.  I have seen well created windows systems boot in 20
> seconds flat which is faster than any linux system I have seen.

Pick your hardware. I can build a Linux system on it that will boot faster
than Windows.

Don't confuse the time before a desktop appears with the time to boot;
Windows is notorious for bringing up a GUI before anything is actually
functional.

Add to that the fact that most Linux systems are running far more services
than the average Windows box; start piling on the apps and Windows boot
times go ballistic. It's not uncommon to see reboot times of >30 *minutes*
on Exchange servers...

> I can load a new bit of hardware and drivers on windows with no problem.

Yep, So can I.

> A
> piece of hard ware for linux well thats a search on the Internet to find
> out if its is compatible and how to get it to install.

Hardware compatability is only a problem because some hardware vendors are
deliberately obstructive in terms of getting their kit to work with Free
Software. The fact that they go out of their way to prevent sales to FOSS
users implies that they are being leant on.

> I can upgrade and install software on Linux.  But I have no real idea what
> I am doing.  I don't care, because if the install or upgrade works I am
> happy.

That is just your lack of familiarity. If you knew more, you would be
happily installing whilst knowing *exactly* what you are doing.

> Doing the same in Windows I knew where everything went.

And that just isn't true.

Do a large installation in Windows - say, Office or somesuch. Do you know
every key change in the registry? Can you find every single change to your
filesystem?

On my system, I can determine every file change and every installation
scriptlet *before* I install something.

> I have OCR programs in windows which work fantastically.  An OCR program
> in Linux has just wasted my time.

Conversely, many people get on fine with such apps. Do not confuse "I
don't know how to ..." with "Linux can't ..."

> I have used disk backups and disk partitioning in windows and they have
> worked very well and I have lost no work.

I have used disk partitioning apps in Windows that have trashed the entire
disk. I have *never* had a problem in Linux - even when I decided to try
stuff that required me to build my own tools.

> I have used those in the Linux system
> and have had my hard disk over written when it should not have.  (More
> a case of > using windows logic on a linux program which was not a good
> idea).

You made a mistake. That happens when you're learning. But you know what
they say about the workman who blames his tools.

> I have free video editor programs in Windows which work very well.  A
> video editor in Linux often leaves me with a bit of swearing.

I've used video editors in both Windows and Linux. I found them all to
work acceptably. But the Windows program cost me a *lot* more money.

> We really need to use an engineering approach to this.  Use each operating
> system the best way possible.  Use the strengths of each operating system
> and make allowances for the weaknesses.

The first part of any such "engineering approach" would be an objective
assessment of what can be done - not just which OS you are more familiar
with. Your argument so far boils down to "I don't understand Linux, so
Windows must be better". That isn't persuasive.

> Setting up to watch videos in windows took me no more than a minute.

Setting up my Linux system to watch videos took me a very small amount of
time. I don't know how much, because it all happened at install time when
I was doing a bazillion other things at the same time.

> Crafting mplayer to do what I want took me a lot more than five minutes
> and then I had to hunt down information to get the subtitles to work.

Subtitles work just fine on my mplayer installation. What did I do to get
them to work? Nothing at all. I just don't mess with things that don't
need messing with.

Vic.


-- 
Please post to: Hampshire@mailman.lug.org.uk
Web Interface: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire
LUG URL: http://www.hantslug.org.uk
--


Re: [Hampshire] pcworld southampton & linux

2009-08-09 Thread john
Hi All

I could not resist the itch to say something.

More than once the use of Microsoft software has save my bacon.

I have the greatest respect for the windows system provided it has no contact 
with the Internet.  I have seen well created windows systems boot in 20 
seconds flat which is faster than any linux system I have seen.

I can load a new bit of hardware and drivers on windows with no problem.  A 
piece of hard ware for linux well thats a search on the Internet to find out 
if its is compatible and how to get it to install.

My everyday operating system is linux.  This is simply because I do not have 
to worry about viruses, trojans, ad-aware, root kits etc.

I can upgrade and install software on Linux.  But I have no real idea what I 
am doing.  I don't care, because if the install or upgrade works I am happy.  

Doing the same in Windows I knew where everything went.

I have OCR programs in windows which work fantastically.  An OCR program in 
Linux has just wasted my time.

I have used disk backups and disk partitioning in windows and they have worked 
very well and I have lost no work.  I have used those in the Linux system and 
have had my hard disk over written when it should not have.  (More a case of 
using windows logic on a linux program which was not a good idea).

I have free video editor programs in Windows which work very well.  A video 
editor in Linux often leaves me with a bit of swearing.

We really need to use an engineering approach to this.  Use each operating 
system the best way possible.  Use the strengths of each operating system and 
make allowances for the weaknesses.

Setting up to watch videos in windows took me no more than a minute.  Crafting 
mplayer to do what I want took me a lot more than five minutes and then I had 
to hunt down information to get the subtitles to work.

Why do I bother to use linux.  It is more stable and less temperamental.  I 
can do more on it.  I don't worry about the latest sneaky bot or virus or 
trojan which means I can be more productive.  It works well on more desktops 
than windows does.

Now if only there can be a Floss equivalent to word perfect or Coral Draw.

John Eayrs







On Saturday 08 August 2009 10:27:19 Andy Smith wrote:
> Hi Alan,
>
> On Sat, Aug 08, 2009 at 09:21:36AM +0100, alan c wrote:
> > Andy Smith wrote:
> > > Linus Torvalds recently had something to say about Microsoft
> > > bashing:
> > >
> > > http://www.linux-mag.com/cache/7439/1.html
> > > "I may make jokes about Microsoft at times, but at the same
> > > time, I think the Microsoft hatred is a disease. I believe
> > > in open development, and that very much involves not just
> > > making the source open, but also not shutting other people
> > > and companies out.
> > >
> > > There are 'extremists' in the free software world, but
> >
> > how many revolutions have there been, driven by *non* extremists?
>
> Making and distributing a FOSS operating system that works better
> than its proprietary rivals is an extreme enough goal for me to
> support.  The idea that this isn't particularly extreme today is
> just a testament to how successful it has been so far - the concept
> used to be laughable.  There is still a long way to go.
>
> I don't feel the need to take it to the next level by demonising
> Microsoft or any other company, and I would question the value of
> doing so.
>
> Cheers,
> Andy


-- 
Please post to: Hampshire@mailman.lug.org.uk
Web Interface: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire
LUG URL: http://www.hantslug.org.uk
--


Re: [Hampshire] pcworld southampton & linux

2009-08-08 Thread Andy Smith
Hi Alan,

On Sat, Aug 08, 2009 at 09:21:36AM +0100, alan c wrote:
> Andy Smith wrote:
> > 
> > Linus Torvalds recently had something to say about Microsoft
> > bashing:
> > 
> > http://www.linux-mag.com/cache/7439/1.html
> > "I may make jokes about Microsoft at times, but at the same
> > time, I think the Microsoft hatred is a disease. I believe
> > in open development, and that very much involves not just
> > making the source open, but also not shutting other people
> > and companies out.
> > 
> > There are 'extremists' in the free software world, but
> 
> how many revolutions have there been, driven by *non* extremists?

Making and distributing a FOSS operating system that works better
than its proprietary rivals is an extreme enough goal for me to
support.  The idea that this isn't particularly extreme today is
just a testament to how successful it has been so far - the concept
used to be laughable.  There is still a long way to go.

I don't feel the need to take it to the next level by demonising
Microsoft or any other company, and I would question the value of
doing so.

Cheers,
Andy

-- 
http://bitfolk.com/ -- No-nonsense VPS hosting

You dont have to be illiterate to use the Internet, but it help's.
 -- Mike Bristow


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- 
Please post to: Hampshire@mailman.lug.org.uk
Web Interface: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire
LUG URL: http://www.hantslug.org.uk
--

Re: [Hampshire] pcworld southampton & linux

2009-08-08 Thread alan c
Andy Smith wrote:

> 
> Linus Torvalds recently had something to say about Microsoft
> bashing:
> 
> http://www.linux-mag.com/cache/7439/1.html
> "I may make jokes about Microsoft at times, but at the same
> time, I think the Microsoft hatred is a disease. I believe
> in open development, and that very much involves not just
> making the source open, but also not shutting other people
> and companies out.
> 
> There are 'extremists' in the free software world, but

how many revolutions have there been, driven by *non* extremists?
-- 
alan cocks
Ubuntu user

-- 
Please post to: Hampshire@mailman.lug.org.uk
Web Interface: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire
LUG URL: http://www.hantslug.org.uk
--


Re: [Hampshire] pcworld southampton & linux

2009-08-08 Thread Andy Smith
Hello Pavithran,

On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 08:31:57PM +0100, pavithran wrote:
> 2009/8/7 Andy Smith :
> 
> > The free software movement has a very vocal minority of people like
> > yourself who are happy to say things like the first paragraph and
> > then argue endlessly about it like the second one.
> 
> So you still say that I belong to the free software movement .

You self-identified as someone with so much Linux spirit that you
just have to call Microsoft names.

Linus Torvalds recently had something to say about Microsoft
bashing:

http://www.linux-mag.com/cache/7439/1.html
"I may make jokes about Microsoft at times, but at the same
time, I think the Microsoft hatred is a disease. I believe
in open development, and that very much involves not just
making the source open, but also not shutting other people
and companies out.

There are 'extremists' in the free software world, but
that's one major reason why I don't call what I do 'free
software' any more. I don't want to be associated with the
people for whom it's about exclusion and hatred."

> @Microsoft  Please forgive me , can't stop calling you "M$" . You have
> produced great rocking software's like Windows XP . I hail thee .
> 
> Happy ?

I don't know yet if you are just trolling the list.

Andy

-- 
http://bitfolk.com/ -- No-nonsense VPS hosting


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- 
Please post to: Hampshire@mailman.lug.org.uk
Web Interface: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire
LUG URL: http://www.hantslug.org.uk
--

Re: [Hampshire] pcworld southampton & linux

2009-08-07 Thread pavithran
2009/8/7 Andy Smith :

> The free software movement has a very vocal minority of people like
> yourself who are happy to say things like the first paragraph and
> then argue endlessly about it like the second one.

So you still say that I belong to the free software movement .
No I don't I am just some child playing around with his EEE 901 and
the baby "sid" LOL
No arguments from now.
@Microsoft  Please forgive me , can't stop calling you "M$" . You have
produced great rocking software's like Windows XP . I hail thee .

Happy ?

Regards,
Pavithran

-- 
pavithran sakamuri
www.pavithran.org

-- 
Please post to: Hampshire@mailman.lug.org.uk
Web Interface: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire
LUG URL: http://www.hantslug.org.uk
--


Re: [Hampshire] pcworld southampton & linux

2009-08-07 Thread Andy Smith
Hello Pavithran,

On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 01:59:03PM +0100, pavithran wrote:
> 2009/8/7 Andy Smith :
> > On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 06:24:07PM +0100, pavithran wrote:
> >> And as Linux users we ( if we have enough free software spirit
> >> ) need not give it its due by calling it respectfully with its
> >> full name .

[...]

> For Your Information Free software Movement *never* calls companies
> with names. I don't represent FSF or any such organisations , why tie
> me with the movement ? ( which I think is doing great work )

The free software movement has a very vocal minority of people like
yourself who are happy to say things like the first paragraph and
then argue endlessly about it like the second one.

Cheers,
Andy

-- 
http://bitfolk.com/ -- No-nonsense VPS hosting


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- 
Please post to: Hampshire@mailman.lug.org.uk
Web Interface: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire
LUG URL: http://www.hantslug.org.uk
--

Re: [Hampshire] pcworld southampton & linux

2009-08-07 Thread pavithran
2009/8/7 Andy Smith :
> Hi Pavithran,
>
> On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 06:24:07PM +0100, pavithran wrote:
>> Professional or not I believe this is *linux* users group . And M$ (
>> not Microsoft) has an awesome reputation of patent allegations against
>> the Free software movement . And as Linux users we ( if we have enough
>> free software spirit ) need not give it its due by calling it
>> respectfully with its full name .
>
> Again you generalise massively; are you really saying that you feel
> you speak for all Linux users with the above (even just all of the
> ones with enough "free software spirit")?
No I can't speak for Hampshire LUG because I don't feel at home in
Hampshire or even it's LUG ( sob sob )
My Home LUG's are Khammam glug,ILUG-HYD,ILUGC,ILUG-B ( India based LUG's )
And foss community in India is quite united in its views .
Yes I am hitting directly at the foss community of United kingdom but
these are my personal views on observing Hantslug & GreaterLondon LUG
for approx 1 year .

*Most of the linux users are really talented
* Most of the users don't care for the difference between "open source
" and " free"
* Most of them are enterprise /business/formal people.

Having said that . the GLUG's in India ( yeah we renamed most of them
to GLUG ) are more friendly and more united in it's views and actually
care more about FOSS philosophy than actual code ( which is changing )

>Do you feel it is a
> requirement of having enough "free software spirit" to call
> Microsoft names?
Ofcourse not but  commenting a LUG member who has used the words "M$"
is definitely not a requirement of a LUG !!

> I do have a lot of respect for many things that Microsoft have
> achieved.
Yeah I accept MS dos was a copied version , Windows 3 copied from mac .. etc
I also think that NT is a great stable product and Xp the shiny
desktop simply works out of the box ( thanks to the great hardware
vendors who sat down and written code for windows drivers )
>I think they've also done some very bad things.
Some is an *under* statement :(
 >I doubt
> I am alone in this view,
I dont think so  !!
>and I am afraid that it is the risk of
> being lumped in with your sort of sentiment that leads me to refrain
> from labelling myself as part of the free software movement, however
> much "free software spirit" I may have.
For Your Information Free software Movement *never* calls companies
with names. I don't represent FSF or any such organisations , why tie
me with the movement ? ( which I think is doing great work )
> I happen to think it is not
> in any way about calling companies stupid names.
Ofcourse not .

> You don't have to agree with what someone does or thinks to have
> respect for them.  To continually call them names just because you
> don't agree with them is I think basically just childish.  Since I
> don't agree with you are you suggesting that I should make some
> humourous mis-spelling of your name and then only call you by that
> on this list?
Yeah I am childish . and no I don't work under  any one and say "Yes
boss or good morning sir "  I am quite informal . I definitely don't
mind you/anyone( in this list ) calling me pvi or povi or anything
weird ( just make sure that I could hear and recognise that you are
calling me )
> In my opinion any serious message you have is immediately cheapened
> by referring to this company as "M$" or "Micro$oft".
I am afraid you might be right because many people tend to be formal
in their approach . But I think a LUG is an informal discussion group
. Yes we do discuss serious issues and definitely I hope( small ray of
hope ) we wont ( my thinking ) get serious on How we call "Microsoft "

Regards,
Pavithran

-- 
pavithran sakamuri
www.pavithran.org

-- 
Please post to: Hampshire@mailman.lug.org.uk
Web Interface: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire
LUG URL: http://www.hantslug.org.uk
--


Re: [Hampshire] pcworld southampton & linux

2009-08-06 Thread Andy Smith
Hi Pavithran,

On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 06:24:07PM +0100, pavithran wrote:
> Professional or not I believe this is *linux* users group . And M$ (
> not Microsoft) has an awesome reputation of patent allegations against
> the Free software movement . And as Linux users we ( if we have enough
> free software spirit ) need not give it its due by calling it
> respectfully with its full name .

Again you generalise massively; are you really saying that you feel
you speak for all Linux users with the above (even just all of the
ones with enough "free software spirit")?  Do you feel it is a
requirement of having enough "free software spirit" to call
Microsoft names?

I do have a lot of respect for many things that Microsoft have
achieved.  I think they've also done some very bad things.  I doubt
I am alone in this view, and I am afraid that it is the risk of
being lumped in with your sort of sentiment that leads me to refrain
from labelling myself as part of the free software movement, however
much "free software spirit" I may have.  I happen to think it is not
in any way about calling companies stupid names.

You don't have to agree with what someone does or thinks to have
respect for them.  To continually call them names just because you
don't agree with them is I think basically just childish.  Since I
don't agree with you are you suggesting that I should make some
humourous mis-spelling of your name and then only call you by that
on this list?  

> Maybe those who wanted to support " Microsfot being called with its
> proper name" ...

It's a sad day when you actually need a reason to NOT call some
company by a playground insult.

In my opinion any serious message you have is immediately cheapened
by referring to this company as "M$" or "Micro$oft".

Cheers,
Andy

-- 
http://bitfolk.com/ -- No-nonsense VPS hosting


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- 
Please post to: Hampshire@mailman.lug.org.uk
Web Interface: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire
LUG URL: http://www.hantslug.org.uk
--

Re: [Hampshire] pcworld southampton & linux (pavithra

2009-08-06 Thread Keith Edmunds
On Thu, 06 Aug 2009 01:56:52 +0100, cgden...@btinternet.com said:

> (I'm self-employed, and I do worry about providing best value for my 
> customers.  That's why I'm barely making a living despite having plenty 
> of work.)

The two need not be mutually exclusive!

Keith

-- 
Please post to: Hampshire@mailman.lug.org.uk
Web Interface: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire
LUG URL: http://www.hantslug.org.uk
--


Re: [Hampshire] pcworld southampton & linux

2009-08-06 Thread pavithran
2009/8/6 Andy Random :
>
> On Wed, 5 Aug 2009, Keith Edmunds wrote:
> Personally I have no problem with it.
Same here . I actually use M$ instead of MS just replaying "S" with $
company because it is *a* rich company :D

> If someone used it all the time in any context that might be slightly
> annoying, but in a "Friday afternoon"/humorous/light hearted context I
> think it is entirely appropriate for the list.
Yeah agree.
>
> There are certainly a lot of things which annoy me a lot more, like
> top-posting, not trimming quoted content, HTML email etc.
same here . I also encountered a well trimmed top posting LOL


> As for it being "unprofessional" well yes of course it is, I would never
> use it in an email to my boss or a customer,
Agree would not use in a business / important transaction which needs
professional ethics .. blah blah blah
> but this list isn't a
> professional forum, and again in the context of "friends" chatting amongst
> themselves on the list I see no issue with it.

Professional or not I believe this is *linux* users group . And M$ (
not Microsoft) has an awesome reputation of patent allegations against
the Free software movement . And as Linux users we ( if we have enough
free software spirit ) need not give it its due by calling it
respectfully with its full name .

Maybe those who wanted to support " Microsfot being called with its
proper name" should be reminded of how M$ tried to hijack one of the
best commercial distributions in the world . Should I give the name ?
Please google for " Microft Novell deal " which pretty explains the
intentions of the company .
Even stock markets call is MSFT .. I call it M$ what's the difference ?

Some people are very happy that M$ has contributed code. So be it who cares !!
See the attitude of M$ towards linux "  We're cheaper than Apple! (but
not Linux)" from CNET news http://bit.ly/BAJAr

Hang me upside down still I am going to call the great Microsoft as M$

Regards,
Pavithran


-- 
pavithran sakamuri
www.pavithran.org

-- 
Please post to: Hampshire@mailman.lug.org.uk
Web Interface: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire
LUG URL: http://www.hantslug.org.uk
--


Re: [Hampshire] pcworld southampton & linux

2009-08-06 Thread Andy Random

On Wed, 5 Aug 2009, Keith Edmunds wrote:

> On Wed, 5 Aug 2009 12:35:31 +, a...@strugglers.net said:
>
>> PS is anyone else really put off by the use of "M$", "Micro$oft",
>>"Microshaft" etc. in emails?
>
> Very much so. It's unprofessional (and to quote my teacher of years ago,
> it isn't big and and it isn't clever). I'd like to think that Linux
> devotees can rise above name calling.

Personally I have no problem with it.

If someone used it all the time in any context that might be slightly 
annoying, but in a "Friday afternoon"/humorous/light hearted context I 
think it is entirely appropriate for the list.

There are certainly a lot of things which annoy me a lot more, like 
top-posting, not trimming quoted content, HTML email etc.

As for it being "unprofessional" well yes of course it is, I would never 
use it in an email to my boss or a customer, but this list isn't a 
professional forum, and again in the context of "friends" chatting amongst 
themselves on the list I see no issue with it.

   Andy

-- 
Please post to: Hampshire@mailman.lug.org.uk
Web Interface: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire
LUG URL: http://www.hantslug.org.uk
--


Re: [Hampshire] pcworld southampton & linux (pavithra

2009-08-06 Thread Alan Pope
2009/8/6 pavithran :
> Ubuntu and its upstream commitments are a bit confusing for me .
>

Can you be more specific?

> Also have a  look at
> http://charismacode.blogspot.com/2007/01/powers-and-repositories-ubuntu-and.html
>

Too long, didn't read.

Cheers,
Al.

-- 
Please post to: Hampshire@mailman.lug.org.uk
Web Interface: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire
LUG URL: http://www.hantslug.org.uk
--


Re: [Hampshire] pcworld southampton & linux (pavithra

2009-08-06 Thread pavithran
2009/8/6 alan c :

> Except when I am in the shower,   :-)  I nearly *always* wear a hat or
> tee shirt advertising my own favourite 'brand' (ubuntu).
> Marketing is partly about establishing a brand, and for better or
> worse, Ubuntu is doing this best.

Ubuntu and its upstream commitments are a bit confusing for me .

can some one please explain me .
Also have a  look at
http://charismacode.blogspot.com/2007/01/powers-and-repositories-ubuntu-and.html

Regards,
Pavithran


-- 
pavithran sakamuri
www.pavithran.org

-- 
Please post to: Hampshire@mailman.lug.org.uk
Web Interface: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire
LUG URL: http://www.hantslug.org.uk
--


Re: [Hampshire] pcworld southampton & linux (pavithra

2009-08-06 Thread alan c
Chris Dennis wrote:
[...]

> Free software is a secret from most people -- they only hear about the 
> stuff that's advertised on the telly.

Well said!
The 'retail therapy' is consumed relentlessly and most people are
completely hooked into it. We are deeply immersed in a retail
environment. It is powered by businesses, and welcomed not rejected,
by most of us as consumers. FOSS is almost entirely a non retail
experience. This is alien to our consumer habits. It takes some
getting used to. It does not fit well into the expected advertising
(expensive) culture, and is tainted in superficial reputation with the
often justified saying  'you dont get owt for nowt'.

Advertising has to be done by - us.

Except when I am in the shower,   :-)  I nearly *always* wear a hat or
tee shirt advertising my own favourite 'brand' (ubuntu).
Marketing is partly about establishing a brand, and for better or
worse, Ubuntu is doing this best.

> On the other hand, there are some who are getting the message.  A bloke 
> phoned me the other day saying "I've just bought a laptop.  It's got 
> Vista on it, but I don't want that.  Please can you install Ubuntu on it 
> for me?".  So I did (and got paid for it).

I have an elderly friend who was scared of computers. She saw a
friend's Ubuntu and was transfixed. She wanted a laptop, her first,
but only with Ubuntu, not Windows. I helped her look round, after she
had gone into her usual John Lewis store in London asking for one, but
found she did not get very far. I know I could have installed Ubuntu
for her onto a laptop, but neither she nor I wanted to -buy- windows,
and she was happiest with the idea of buying into a conventional
'retail' experience. I knew also that the use of a working  integrated
webcam, cordless mouse and a mobile internet dongle - would all be
paramount for her.

Linux Emporium were good for the stock laptop item and the background
questions and support. They made a sale.

The even more notable thing was that another elderly (mutual) friend
liked the Ubuntu laptop so much that she also bought one just the same
a few weeks later! along with a small progfile HP printer, which Linux
Emporium also helped configure. Not that it needed any work in the
event, but their experienced support was highly valued.

In summary, this was a double sale of Ubuntu laptops, and a printer,
expressley not Windows, and it came about because people had seen
Ubuntu and Windows and knew they had a choice (with my help after they
asked me).

Keep up the spreading the word, and help your friends, they are the
lucky ones.
-- 
alan cocks
Ubuntu user

-- 
Please post to: Hampshire@mailman.lug.org.uk
Web Interface: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire
LUG URL: http://www.hantslug.org.uk
--


Re: [Hampshire] pcworld southampton & linux

2009-08-06 Thread Ally Biggs

Problem is your average consumer simply do not know what the hell Linux
is, They go for Windows because it's what they have used and are
comfortable in using it. The average user wants something to be working
straight out of the box they do not want to be compiling Kernals or
running various commands in Bash and editing config files when
something goes tits up

That's my only major complaint with Linux
not everyone is a guru and when things do go wrong with it and you do
not know what you are doing it can be a daunting experience and from a
consumer point of view I would guess this would pretty much put them
off Linux and revert them back to Windows.

I mean your average
consumer does not really know what a GUI is let alone Linux :) I can
vouch for this I sell refurbished kit, primarily windows machines as
this where the demand is people are scared of something different. I
have sat there and talked customers through the benefits of Open Source
what you can achieve with Open Source Software and Why you do not need
a Windows machine to browse the internet and work with documentation. I
might aswell sit there and just say Windows is s**t buy this. Despite
my efforts it seems people are still very reluctant to get behind Linux.

As
for Netbooks you see a similar pattern for those customers who are
willing to make a change and invest in a Linux Netbook.The transition
has to be smooth i.e no problems with the O/S and configuration user's
simply end up out of there depth in terms of knowledge and end up with
a machine they cannot configure to resolve the issue and end up
reverting back to windows which is upping Windows Market share.

It'll
be interesting to see what will happen with the Netbook Market
obviously I predict Microsoft will continue to grow with the release of
Windows 7 netbook edition. Customers will eat this up if its anything
like XP.

It'll be interesting to see how Linux and distributions like Ubuntu counter 
this.

Don't
get me wrong I am a keen Linux user and it is my preferred operating
system of choice but the end customer experience has to be improved in
order for it to gain a better reputation and market share.

My thoughts


> Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 20:59:32 +0100
> From: phi...@stuphi.co.uk
> To: hampshire@mailman.lug.org.uk
> Subject: Re: [Hampshire] pcworld southampton & linux
> 
> 2009/8/5 Keith Edmunds :
> > On Wed, 5 Aug 2009 12:35:31 +, a...@strugglers.net said:
> >
> >> PS is anyone else really put off by the use of "M$", "Micro$oft",
> >>"Microshaft" etc. in emails?
> >
> > Very much so. It's unprofessional (and to quote my teacher of years ago,
> > it isn't big and and it isn't clever). I'd like to think that Linux
> > devotees can rise above name calling.
> 
> Also, they have now contributed code. That's more than I have done! :-)
> 
> -- 
> Philip Stubbs
> 
> -- 
> Please post to: Hampshire@mailman.lug.org.uk
> Web Interface: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire
> LUG URL: http://www.hantslug.org.uk
> --

_
Windows Live Messenger: Celebrate 10 amazing years with free winks and 
emoticons.
http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/157562755/direct/01/-- 
Please post to: Hampshire@mailman.lug.org.uk
Web Interface: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire
LUG URL: http://www.hantslug.org.uk
--

Re: [Hampshire] pcworld southampton & linux (pavithra

2009-08-05 Thread Chris Dennis
Luke Stutters wrote:
> The success of any business depends completely on providing the
> best value for its customers. Any business can be aided by monopolistic
> and illegal practices but no business will succeed if it is seen as offering
> poor value.

Sadly that's not true.  The success of a business depends on making a 
profit.  Long-term success depends on continuing to make a profit. 
Providing good value to ensure that customers return is only one 
strategy for achieving this.  Selling the goods with the biggest mark-up 
will work too if the number of customers who complain or realise they've 
been ripped off is small.  And effective marketing (such as making sure 
your operating system is packaged with every PC sold) will overcome all 
sorts of failings in the product.

(I'm self-employed, and I do worry about providing best value for my 
customers.  That's why I'm barely making a living despite having plenty 
of work.)

> 8<
> 
> I really can't agree that subtle and gentle promotion is what is needed. I 
> don't
> think awareness or availability of open source software are its key
> drawbacks. There is no linux shortage, there is no secret free software.

Free software is a secret from most people -- they only hear about the 
stuff that's advertised on the telly.

On the other hand, there are some who are getting the message.  A bloke 
phoned me the other day saying "I've just bought a laptop.  It's got 
Vista on it, but I don't want that.  Please can you install Ubuntu on it 
for me?".  So I did (and got paid for it).

cheers

Chris
-- 
Chris Dennis  cgden...@btinternet.com
Fordingbridge, Hampshire, UK

-- 
Please post to: Hampshire@mailman.lug.org.uk
Web Interface: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire
LUG URL: http://www.hantslug.org.uk
--


Re: [Hampshire] pcworld southampton & linux

2009-08-05 Thread Jacqui Caren
Philip Stubbs wrote:
> Also, they have now contributed code. That's more than I have done! :-)

They have been shown they are legally required to do something they failed
to do and have decided to make a big fuss and make it sound like they made
the decision instead of being forced into it!

IMHO anything that comes out of marketing depts has to be untrue or just plain 
evil
- even catbert avoids the marketing dept!

Jacqui

-- 
Please post to: Hampshire@mailman.lug.org.uk
Web Interface: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire
LUG URL: http://www.hantslug.org.uk
--


Re: [Hampshire] pcworld southampton & linux

2009-08-05 Thread Philip Stubbs
2009/8/5 Keith Edmunds :
> On Wed, 5 Aug 2009 12:35:31 +, a...@strugglers.net said:
>
>> PS is anyone else really put off by the use of "M$", "Micro$oft",
>>    "Microshaft" etc. in emails?
>
> Very much so. It's unprofessional (and to quote my teacher of years ago,
> it isn't big and and it isn't clever). I'd like to think that Linux
> devotees can rise above name calling.

Also, they have now contributed code. That's more than I have done! :-)

-- 
Philip Stubbs

-- 
Please post to: Hampshire@mailman.lug.org.uk
Web Interface: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire
LUG URL: http://www.hantslug.org.uk
--


Re: [Hampshire] pcworld southampton & linux

2009-08-05 Thread Keith Edmunds
On Wed, 5 Aug 2009 12:35:31 +, a...@strugglers.net said:

> PS is anyone else really put off by the use of "M$", "Micro$oft",
>"Microshaft" etc. in emails?

Very much so. It's unprofessional (and to quote my teacher of years ago,
it isn't big and and it isn't clever). I'd like to think that Linux
devotees can rise above name calling.

-- 
Keith Edmunds

+-+
|Tiger Computing Ltd|  Helping businesses make the most of Linux  |
|  "The Linux Specialists"  |   http://www.tiger-computing.co.uk  |
+-+

-- 
Please post to: Hampshire@mailman.lug.org.uk
Web Interface: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire
LUG URL: http://www.hantslug.org.uk
--


Re: [Hampshire] pcworld southampton & linux

2009-08-05 Thread Vic

>I doubt any "enterprise" of any size would even consider going to
> PC World. It's very much a consumer-level place, selling to people who
> don't know the technology, and probably don't want to know about it.

I had to go to PCWorld a few weeks back - I was on customer site, and we
had a faulty router that needed urgent replacement.

They made a big fuss about their business accounts - you get a different
selection of stock, and much keener prices.

...Which left them overpriced by about £20 on a router :-(

>I would suggest that ... the assistant you spoke to didn't know his
> arse from his elbow

Nah, that wouldn't happen is a DSG shop, would it?

Vic.


-- 
Please post to: Hampshire@mailman.lug.org.uk
Web Interface: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire
LUG URL: http://www.hantslug.org.uk
--


Re: [Hampshire] pcworld southampton & linux

2009-08-05 Thread Philip Stubbs
2009/8/5 Hugo Mills :
>   I doubt any "enterprise" of any size would even consider going to
> PC World. It's very much a consumer-level place, selling to people who
> don't know the technology, and probably don't want to know about it.

Ha. My boss has a PC-World Business account. Admitted, he probably
also comes under the 'don't want to know about it'. That said, if you
really do need some extra DVD+R's, or replace a faulty keyboard, being
able to pop round the corner and have them in your hand in two minutes
can be worth the premium paid on occasion.

-- 
Philip Stubbs

-- 
Please post to: Hampshire@mailman.lug.org.uk
Web Interface: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire
LUG URL: http://www.hantslug.org.uk
--


Re: [Hampshire] pcworld southampton & linux

2009-08-05 Thread Jacqui Caren
Hugo Mills wrote:
>If all you want to do is handle the goods, try going to John Lewis.
> They may not have as large a selection as PC World (the one here has
> about 8 feet of shelf space assigned to netbooks, not 20), but they'll
> definitely have them.

Staples also do a good display of PC's and have lots of junior staff but
often have one or two knowldgeable staff on tap!

They also do some quite nice bargains at odd times.

Jacqui

-- 
Please post to: Hampshire@mailman.lug.org.uk
Web Interface: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire
LUG URL: http://www.hantslug.org.uk
--


Re: [Hampshire] pcworld southampton & linux (pavithra

2009-08-05 Thread Luke Stutters
2009/8/5 Edward Beckmann 
> Hi

Hi

[SNIP]

> 1. online stores do not have the costs of employing assistants, keeping
> lights on, having displays, renting shops or car parks. Obviously they
> will be more expensive than online unless they are going to go bust.
> Shops are for people who are willing to pay for advice. parking etc.
> Saying you can buy online cheaper is about as constructive as walking
> into a restaurant and saying the ingredients are cheaper in Tesco's. I
> would be amazed if you really expected to get a netbook for a decent price.

A business can run both a conventional shop and an online store. PC
World is a online retailer too. I think their customers would be
entirely justified
in expecting decent prices from them. However, it pays to be sure so I have
emailed PC World customer services and I am waiting for their reply.

> 2. some shop assistants give poor advice, some give better and this
> depends on their training and motives. If PC World make a markup on
> having a bit of kit with windows on it, they are a bit dumb to try and get
> customers to buy something without windows or to use open source software.
> Although there is a moral debate about shop assistants acting in the
> customer's best interests here, a business goes bust if it consistently 
> advises
> people how to do without it. PC World's job is to make money, not ensure
> best value for people who use computers.

The success of any business depends completely on providing the
best value for its customers. Any business can be aided by monopolistic
and illegal practices but no business will succeed if it is seen as offering
poor value.

[SNIP]

> What's my conclusion? I am certainly no fan but acknowledge that MS is
> not totally stupid to have managed people's knowledge (or lack of it) so
> effectively to date.  They have managed to be seen as the only real option
> for a lot of people's lifetimes! The way us open source fans can help is in
> subtly and gently helping people to become aware of the alternatives, and
> helping them in small steps. We can waste a lot of time and energy by
> pushing against simple business economics of IT suppliers and retailers
> unless we take a moment to consider how they operate.

Saying Microsoft must be a great computer company because they have
sold more software than anyone else is like saying Thomas Kinkade must
be a great artist because he has sold more art than anyone else. Microsoft
have been around since 1975 and they have only been preeminent since 1995.
If they had been split in 2001 following the judgment that labelled them an
"abusive monopoly", I very much doubt they would be enjoying their current
reputation of using their talents to sell bad software and exploit
their customers.

I really can't agree that subtle and gentle promotion is what is needed. I don't
think awareness or availability of open source software are its key
drawbacks. There is no linux shortage, there is no secret free software.

In my brief experience in the IT world, Microsoft products are used because of
compatibility and familiarity. Microsoft have made every effort to reduce the
compatibility and familiarity of open source software using legal and
development strategies. The best way to see a free operating system in a shop
like PC World would be to help free projects to address these concerns.

However, I am reliably informed that it is very boring in PC World and
it is always
nice to have someone to talk to. Plus, what Hugo said.

-- 
Please post to: Hampshire@mailman.lug.org.uk
Web Interface: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire
LUG URL: http://www.hantslug.org.uk
--


Re: [Hampshire] pcworld southampton & linux (pavithra

2009-08-05 Thread Hugo Mills
On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 02:04:02PM +0100, pavithran wrote:
> 2009/8/5 Edward Beckmann :
> > What's my conclusion? I am certainly no fan but acknowledge that MS is not
> > totally stupid to have managed people's knowledge (or lack of it) so
> > effectively to date.  They have managed to be seen as the only real option
> > for a lot of people's lifetimes!
> The whole point is even if people are buying netbooks and installing
> ubuntu remix vendors like Asus and shops like PCworld disregard linux
> and do Bad PR on linux which is actually hurting those newbies who
> might be interested :(

   That's because the over-the-counter sales of netbooks have
reportedly been extremely poor for shops. Either they're mis-selling
the equipment, or purchasers are making unwarranted assumptions about
what they're getting. Either way, they're reporting very high
return/refund rates for Linux-based netbooks. Equally anecdotally, the
return rates on mail-order Linux-based netbooks are much, much lower.

   What it means for PC World is that given their current set-up, it's
not worth their while trying to sell Linux-based machines, because
they know that they'll get a high proportion of returns (which
ultimately costs them money). It's a debatable point whether the cause
for the returns is:

 - Poor salesmanship
 - Poor knowledge of the equipment by the sales staff
 - Lack of understanding of the implications of buying a Linux
   machine, onthe part of the purchasers
 - Linux being unusable
 - Linux being sufficiently different from the expected Windows that
   people don't want to use it
 - Any other reason

   Some of the above problems are fixable by PC World. Some are not.
Is it going to be economically worth it for PC World to try to fix the
problems above in the light of the risks involved? I would guess not:
the substantial cost of a complete training programme for staff so
that they can tell their customers what Linux is and what it can do,
vs the chance that they might get fewer returns of a small (and
probably narrow-margin) proportion of their business. Doesn't sound
good to me...

   Hugo.

-- 
=== Hugo Mills: h...@... carfax.org.uk | darksatanic.net | lug.org.uk ===
  PGP key: 515C238D from wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net or http://www.carfax.org.uk
   --- "There's a Martian war machine outside -- they want to talk ---   
to you about a cure for the common cold."


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- 
Please post to: Hampshire@mailman.lug.org.uk
Web Interface: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire
LUG URL: http://www.hantslug.org.uk
--

Re: [Hampshire] pcworld southampton & linux

2009-08-05 Thread Hugo Mills
On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 02:11:29PM +0100, pavithran wrote:
> 2009/8/5 Philip Stubbs :
> > 2009/8/5 pavithran :
> >> Disclaimer: PC world might have been doing this for long time . This
> >> is the first time I ever set foot in a big computer shop . I know that
> >> I can buy cheap netbooks online but I would like to touch and feel it
> >> on a shop before buying .
> >
> > Do what we all do. Go to PC World to touch and feel it. Then go buy
> > the same thing, for cheaper, on-line.
> 
> Maybe you didn't read my mail completely :P
> 
> There is no PC err netbook in PCworld to touch and feel just because
> of the reason ( acoording to employee ) that those cheap netbooks come
> with linux .

   Last time I went into a PC World (here in Reading), they had a good
20 feet of display space for "Netbook" laptops. It wasn't explicitly
labelled as such, but they had a comprehensive range. I'd be surprised
if any other PC World was significantly different.

> I can go online but I would like to check in a shop as said earlier
> how the netbook screen is and how usable the keyboard is because they
> are very important points while buying a netbook .

   Indeed. This was my reason for going into the Reading one.

> Looks like PC world is more for " PC" or enterprise customers cause ll
> the products which I saw today are very costly  . ( including PC's )

   I doubt any "enterprise" of any size would even consider going to
PC World. It's very much a consumer-level place, selling to people who
don't know the technology, and probably don't want to know about it.

> Yeah better off buying at amazon or ebay and trust the  manufacturer
> or some online review of the product huh .. but can I get to see cheap
> laptops in london stores or do even they speak the same " PC world "
> lingo ?

   I would suggest that either you have an extremely unusual PC World,
or the assistant you spoke to didn't know his arse from his elbow, or
you were simply looking in the wrong place in the shop...

   If all you want to do is handle the goods, try going to John Lewis.
They may not have as large a selection as PC World (the one here has
about 8 feet of shelf space assigned to netbooks, not 20), but they'll
definitely have them.

   Hugo.

-- 
=== Hugo Mills: h...@... carfax.org.uk | darksatanic.net | lug.org.uk ===
  PGP key: 515C238D from wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net or http://www.carfax.org.uk
   --- "There's a Martian war machine outside -- they want to talk ---   
to you about a cure for the common cold."


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- 
Please post to: Hampshire@mailman.lug.org.uk
Web Interface: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire
LUG URL: http://www.hantslug.org.uk
--

Re: [Hampshire] pcworld southampton & linux

2009-08-05 Thread pavithran
2009/8/5 Philip Stubbs :
> 2009/8/5 pavithran :
>> Disclaimer: PC world might have been doing this for long time . This
>> is the first time I ever set foot in a big computer shop . I know that
>> I can buy cheap netbooks online but I would like to touch and feel it
>> on a shop before buying .
>
> Do what we all do. Go to PC World to touch and feel it. Then go buy
> the same thing, for cheaper, on-line.

Maybe you didn't read my mail completely :P

There is no PC err netbook in PCworld to touch and feel just because
of the reason ( acoording to employee ) that those cheap netbooks come
with linux .

I can go online but I would like to check in a shop as said earlier
how the netbook screen is and how usable the keyboard is because they
are very important points while buying a netbook .

Looks like PC world is more for " PC" or enterprise customers cause ll
the products which I saw today are very costly  . ( including PC's )

Yeah better off buying at amazon or ebay and trust the  manufacturer
or some online review of the product huh .. but can I get to see cheap
laptops in london stores or do even they speak the same " PC world "
lingo ?


Regards,
Pavithran

-- 
pavithran sakamuri
www.pavithran.org

-- 
Please post to: Hampshire@mailman.lug.org.uk
Web Interface: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire
LUG URL: http://www.hantslug.org.uk
--


Re: [Hampshire] pcworld southampton & linux (pavithra

2009-08-05 Thread pavithran
2009/8/5 Edward Beckmann :
> What's my conclusion? I am certainly no fan but acknowledge that MS is not
> totally stupid to have managed people's knowledge (or lack of it) so
> effectively to date.  They have managed to be seen as the only real option
> for a lot of people's lifetimes!
The whole point is even if people are buying netbooks and installing
ubuntu remix vendors like Asus and shops like PCworld disregard linux
and do Bad PR on linux which is actually hurting those newbies who
might be interested :(
>The way us open source fans can help is in
> subtly and gently helping people to become aware of the alternatives, and
> helping them in small steps.
+1
 >We can waste a lot of time and energy by
> pushing against simple business economics of IT suppliers and retailers
> unless we take a moment to consider how they operate.

Have to agree , understanding the whole issue is definitely a pain and
is better left to redhat,novell,mandriva and cannonical .


Regards,
Pavithran

-- 
Please post to: Hampshire@mailman.lug.org.uk
Web Interface: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire
LUG URL: http://www.hantslug.org.uk
--


Re: [Hampshire] pcworld southampton & linux

2009-08-05 Thread Alan Pope
2009/8/5 Andy Smith :
> PS is anyone else really put off by the use of "M$", "Micro$oft",
>   "Microshaft" etc. in emails?
>

Incredibly. We try to discourage it in the Ubuntu community, but some
people persist.

Cheers,
Al.

-- 
Please post to: Hampshire@mailman.lug.org.uk
Web Interface: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire
LUG URL: http://www.hantslug.org.uk
--


Re: [Hampshire] pcworld southampton & linux

2009-08-05 Thread Andy Smith
Hi Stephen,

On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 12:15:39PM +0100, Stephen Davies wrote:
> I vowed  never to enter one ever again after the insisted that I
> provide a valid name & address for a cash purchase.

William Gates
1 Microsoft Way
Redmond, WA
United States

is a valid name and address.

Cheers,
Andy

PS is anyone else really put off by the use of "M$", "Micro$oft",
   "Microshaft" etc. in emails?

-- 
http://bitfolk.com/ -- No-nonsense VPS hosting

"Reinventing the wheel is bad not only because it wastes time, but because
 reinvented wheels are often square." -- Henry Spencer


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- 
Please post to: Hampshire@mailman.lug.org.uk
Web Interface: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire
LUG URL: http://www.hantslug.org.uk
--

Re: [Hampshire] pcworld southampton & linux

2009-08-05 Thread Stephen Davies
Pavithran,
 Welcome to the joys of shopping at a branch of PC-World or other DSG 
Intnl group store (Dixons, Currys)
your experience is not that uncommon.
Even when they had some eeeBook 701's with Linux on them, the 
employees(from my experience) promoted the Windows alternatives. The 
quote about not being able to download anything is also (again from my 
own experience) not unheard of either.

There are other places to shop. IMHO, PC-World is the store of last 
resort and I will only enter one with gritted teeth. I vowed  never to 
enter one ever again after the insisted that I provide a valid name & 
address for a cash purchase.

 Stephen D


-- 
Please post to: Hampshire@mailman.lug.org.uk
Web Interface: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire
LUG URL: http://www.hantslug.org.uk
--


Re: [Hampshire] pcworld southampton & linux (pavithra

2009-08-05 Thread Edward Beckmann
Hi

There are a couple of issues here and I'm not going to particularly add to
the MS debate.

1. online buying v shop buying
2. good advice v poor advice
3. targeting your customer

1. online stores do not have the costs of employing assistants, keeping
lights on, having displays, renting shops or car parks. Obviously they will
be more expensive than online unless they are going to go bust. Shops are
for people who are willing to pay for advice. parking etc. Saying you can
buy online cheaper is about as constructive as walking into a restaurant and
saying the ingredients are cheaper in Tesco's. I would be amazed if you
really expected to get a netbook for a decent price.

2. some shop assistants give poor advice, some give better and this depends
on their training and motives. If PC World make a markup on having a bit of
kit with windows on it, they are a bit dumb to try and get customers to buy
something without windows or to use open source software. Although there is
a moral debate about shop assistants acting in the customer's best interests
here, a business goes bust if it consistently advises people how to do
without it. PC World's job is to make money, not ensure best value for
people who use computers.

3. PC World's intended main customer is not necessarily a person who is an
expert in hardware or software. Those of us who invest in our learning can
save or make money by using it - a PC World customers pays more than they
need because they lack either the time to do research or the awareness that
they could.

What's my conclusion? I am certainly no fan but acknowledge that MS is not
totally stupid to have managed people's knowledge (or lack of it) so
effectively to date.  They have managed to be seen as the only real option
for a lot of people's lifetimes! The way us open source fans can help is in
subtly and gently helping people to become aware of the alternatives, and
helping them in small steps. We can waste a lot of time and energy by
pushing against simple business economics of IT suppliers and retailers
unless we take a moment to consider how they operate.

Thanks for reading

Ed


>
> That employee didn't have anything to tell he just slipped away LOL
> I bought my 8 GB pen drive for 13 ? and left the PC world singing " I
> am a PC and I use linux :D "
>
> Disclaimer: PC world might have been doing this for long time . This
> is the first time I ever set foot in a big computer shop . I know that
> I can buy cheap netbooks online but I would like to touch and feel it
> on a shop before buying .
>
> Regards,
> Pavithran
> --
> pavithran sakamuri
> www.pavithran.org
>
>
>
> --
>
> --
> Please post to: Hampshire@mailman.lug.org.uk
> Web Interface: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire
> LUG URL: http://www.hantslug.org.uk
> --
>
> End of Hampshire Digest, Vol 34, Issue 6
> 
>
-- 
Please post to: Hampshire@mailman.lug.org.uk
Web Interface: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire
LUG URL: http://www.hantslug.org.uk
--

Re: [Hampshire] pcworld southampton & linux

2009-08-05 Thread Philip Stubbs
2009/8/5 pavithran :
> Disclaimer: PC world might have been doing this for long time . This
> is the first time I ever set foot in a big computer shop . I know that
> I can buy cheap netbooks online but I would like to touch and feel it
> on a shop before buying .

Do what we all do. Go to PC World to touch and feel it. Then go buy
the same thing, for cheaper, on-line.

I know that lot of people have a low opinion of PC World, but they do
occasionally do good deals. When I bought my laptop a few years ago,
they had the spec I wanted for much less than anywhere else as by
chance what I wanted was a special promotion. They did try and sell me
an extended warranty that would have made up the difference. When they
told me it would include a 'free' yearly disk cleanup, I quite enjoyed
telling them that I was just going to wipe the disk and install Linux.
:-)

-- 
Philip Stubbs

-- 
Please post to: Hampshire@mailman.lug.org.uk
Web Interface: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire
LUG URL: http://www.hantslug.org.uk
--


[Hampshire] pcworld southampton & linux

2009-08-05 Thread pavithran
hi all,
I went to the PC world located opposite the southampton central
railway station today to buy a pen drive .

This is my first time inside such a big computer shop hence was
surprised to see separate section for anti virus software,office and
other softwares like graphics education .

I wanted to buy a small cheap netbook as a gift hence went to the
sections to see that there is no separate section for netbook which
was shocking !  I assumed that such a big shop like PC world would
have a seperate netbook section hence went and asked the employee he
told that was it .
Here is a small chat with him :
Me : Do you sell cheap netbooks
Emp: How cheap ?
Me: The cheapest you can
Emp: The cheapest we sell is 230 £
Me ( opened my mouth wide ) you kidding right ?
Emp: No thats the cheapest we sell !
Me:  I have seen amazon selling netbooks for 120 -150 £
Emp : Bu they don't have windows !
Me : So what you dont sell a product if it doesnt have windows
Emp: No you cant use linux .. and you cant download anything in linux
/Me was boiling but dont want to scarte the poor PC world employee
Me: Linux is pretty usable . please do sell it .
Emp: even if we sell it no one is going to buy it
Me : Asus has completely tied up with M$ now even big shops like PC
world are doing this . Please go read the guardian article on M$
hijacking the netbook market .

That employee didn't have anything to tell he just slipped away LOL
I bought my 8 GB pen drive for 13 £ and left the PC world singing " I
am a PC and I use linux :D "

Disclaimer: PC world might have been doing this for long time . This
is the first time I ever set foot in a big computer shop . I know that
I can buy cheap netbooks online but I would like to touch and feel it
on a shop before buying .

Regards,
Pavithran
-- 
pavithran sakamuri
www.pavithran.org

-- 
Please post to: Hampshire@mailman.lug.org.uk
Web Interface: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire
LUG URL: http://www.hantslug.org.uk
--