[H] bigpantsmouse

2005-05-06 Thread Al

http://www.bigpantsmouse.com/home.html

Al


RE: [H] New MS rule

2005-05-06 Thread Michael Decker
It'll either make people upgrade or make people use a fake/pirated/stolen
number. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thane Sherrington
Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2005 9:57 AM
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: [H] New MS rule

This is lovely.  The new MS rule on regenerating Auth numbers for people 
with CDs and lost numbers.  You fax in a proof of purchase (must be a 
receipt) and pay then $15 and if you call the US number, they'll generate 
the number and call back in FOUR WEEKS!  Here in Canada, it's FOUR to SIX 
weeks!  So if you've lost your auth number, you're screwed.  Does anyone 
see this as simply a drive to make people to upgrade to XP.



[H] New batch of spam mails on RR account

2005-05-06 Thread Bobby Heid
Hey all,
Just in the past few days, I have gotten probably 100 emails that look
similar with many of them containing viruses.  My email address is not in
the to: list.  How do I get them if I am not in the to: list?  Anyone else
getting these lately?  

There are about 4-5 variants of this email.  This one has a subject of
'Mailing error.'  Some talk about a registration code, etc.

I have included the headers from the original email, followed by the actual
email after my sig.

Thanks,
Bobby


Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from ms-mta-01-eri0 (ms-mta-01-eri0 [10.25.8.234])
 by ms-mss-04.southeast.rr.com
 (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.04 (built Feb  8 2005))  with ESMTP
id [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu,  05 May 2005 22:59:25
-0400 (EDT)
Received: from kcmx03.mgw.rr.com (kcmx03.mgw.rr.com [24.94.165.192])  by
ms-mta-01.southeast.rr.com  (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.04 (built
Feb  8 2005))  with ESMTP id [EMAIL PROTECTED];
Thu,  05 May 2005 22:59:25 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from orngca-mx-01.mgw.rr.com
 (orngca-mx-01.mgw.rr.com [66.75.160.128])  by kcmx03.mgw.rr.com
 (8.12.10/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j462qTER024543; Thu,
 05 May 2005 22:59:13 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from rrcs-24-172-237-94.midsouth.biz.rr.com (HELO aibdqdjg.com)
 (24.172.237.94) by orngca-mx-01.mgw.rr.com with SMTP; Thu,
 05 May 2005 22:58:46 -0400
Date: Fri, 06 May 2005 02:56:26 + (UTC)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: mailing error
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: AnonMail_Version 6.92
Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary==fb083b51dc9d0ac9
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Importance: Normal
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-priority: Normal
X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine
X-Virus-Scan-Result: Repaired 36048 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2005 10:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: mailing error


This is an automatically generated E-Mail Delivery Status Notification.

Mail-Header, Mail-Body and Error Description are attached




Re: [H] New batch of spam mails on RR account

2005-05-06 Thread Anthony Q. Martin
Can't answer you question...but don't you block these on the server and 
delete from there?  just curious as to how folks deal with spamme, I 
never let them get to my PC...so virus protection is a nonissue...

Bobby Heid wrote:
Hey all,
Just in the past few days, I have gotten probably 100 emails that look
similar with many of them containing viruses.  My email address is not in
the to: list.  How do I get them if I am not in the to: list?  Anyone else
getting these lately?  

There are about 4-5 variants of this email.  This one has a subject of
'Mailing error.'  Some talk about a registration code, etc.
I have included the headers from the original email, followed by the actual
email after my sig.
 




RE: [H] New batch of spam mails on RR account

2005-05-06 Thread Bobby Heid
This is a road runner account.  So I don't get to handle the server.  RR
does block some spam (I usually get very little spam at home).  NAV cleans
the viruses from these emails.

I am just curious as to the number of them just recently and the fact that
they do not appear to be to me.

Bobby

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Anthony Q. Martin
Sent: Friday, May 06, 2005 7:51 AM
To: The Hardware List
Subject: Re: [H] New batch of spam mails on RR account


Can't answer you question...but don't you block these on the server and 
delete from there?  just curious as to how folks deal with spamme, I 
never let them get to my PC...so virus protection is a nonissue...




Re: [H] New batch of spam mails on RR account

2005-05-06 Thread chuck
- Original Message - 
From: Bobby Heid [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: HardwareGroup hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Sent: Friday, May 06, 2005 7:46 AM
Subject: [H] New batch of spam mails on RR account


Hey all,
Just in the past few days, I have gotten probably 100 emails that look
similar with many of them containing viruses.  My email address is not in
the to: list.  How do I get them if I am not in the to: list?  Anyone else
getting these lately?
I am getting junk like this, also. 5 years ago I predicted the hackers would 
take down the Internet. In a sense, they have. Internet users have about the 
same freedom of a high profile dignatary that has to stay around bodyguards 
to keep from being killed. Using the Internet is like life on the street, 
requiring more and more security each year. Some claim they have not beefed 
up their personal security in the past 5 years. Public security to protect 
them (airlines and all public gatherings) gets beefed up constantly. This 
lowers the standard of living for everyone. Example: Some have to forgo the 
new large screen television to buy a new home alarm system. This is not off 
topic if used in context to illustrate that these spam emails you and I are 
discussing are taking their toll on the freedom and ease of use of the 
Internet.

Chuck



Re: [H] New batch of spam mails on RR account

2005-05-06 Thread warpmedia
A good approach that I've been using for a few years is to limit the 
size of email that you d/l to under 4K. You'll know it's spam, just 
won't know if it's a virus since not enough comes down to set off the AV 
scanner.

Caveat is wanted email w/ more than 4096 characters has to be d/l OTF.
Anthony Q. Martin wrote:
Can't answer you question...but don't you block these on the server and 
delete from there?  just curious as to how folks deal with spamme, I 
never let them get to my PC...so virus protection is a nonissue...

Bobby Heid wrote:
Hey all,
Just in the past few days, I have gotten probably 100 emails that look
similar with many of them containing viruses.  My email address is not in
the to: list.  How do I get them if I am not in the to: list?  Anyone 
else
getting these lately? 
There are about 4-5 variants of this email.  This one has a subject of
'Mailing error.'  Some talk about a registration code, etc.

I have included the headers from the original email, followed by the 
actual
email after my sig.
 





Re: [H] Weird one

2005-05-06 Thread Ben Ruset
Mark,
If everything works but that one site, and the mouse moves around but 
does not click on that one site, I'd bet that it is something with that 
site that is causing the problem.

Have you tried a different browser?
Mark Dodge wrote:
I have a Latitude at work that some how got some viruses, over 300 files
were infected. Needless to say I nuke the install and formatted the drive
and reinstalled windows. It is a PII and only 64MB Ram so 98 was in order
again. Everything is fine with the install, had the drivers for everything
and used a PMCIA network card to install all updates and so forth thru
Windows Update and have a problem with a particular page and the mouse.
It has a synaptic touch pad and also a PS2 mouse for the weenies. I can
connect to the internet with both the buildings network (Wells Fargo with a
proxy) and our Dial Up/VPN to get out to the outside world. I can surf and
connect to all kinds of sites and use our proprietary system to connect thru
a terminal server to a inventory management software, all works...BUTTT
We have an Intranet site that we need to access for expense reporting and
timesheets. When I go into and log onto the Intranet the mouse is no longer
available. The cursor moves but does not activate by clicks. I can tab thru
the page, a big pain in the ass, but can not click on anything with the
mouse or the touch pad, either together or each individually. It is the only
thing that is a problem.
Any Ideas???
I have re-installed the latest and not so latest drivers for both and the
video drivers and even made sure that there was no conflict with IRQ's and
such.
Mark Dodge
MD Computers
602-421-0329 




RE: [H] New batch of spam mails on RR account

2005-05-06 Thread Chris Reeves
It's part of the new Win32-Sober virus.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of warpmedia
Sent: Friday, May 06, 2005 7:17 AM
To: The Hardware List
Subject: Re: [H] New batch of spam mails on RR account

A good approach that I've been using for a few years is to limit the 
size of email that you d/l to under 4K. You'll know it's spam, just 
won't know if it's a virus since not enough comes down to set off the AV 
scanner.

Caveat is wanted email w/ more than 4096 characters has to be d/l OTF.

Anthony Q. Martin wrote:
 Can't answer you question...but don't you block these on the server and 
 delete from there?  just curious as to how folks deal with spamme, I 
 never let them get to my PC...so virus protection is a nonissue...
 
 
 Bobby Heid wrote:
 
 Hey all,
 Just in the past few days, I have gotten probably 100 emails that look
 similar with many of them containing viruses.  My email address is not in
 the to: list.  How do I get them if I am not in the to: list?  Anyone 
 else
 getting these lately? 
 There are about 4-5 variants of this email.  This one has a subject of
 'Mailing error.'  Some talk about a registration code, etc.

 I have included the headers from the original email, followed by the 
 actual
 email after my sig.
  

 
 





Re: [H] New batch of spam mails on RR account

2005-05-06 Thread warpmedia
I guess I agree with you in a sense.
What has happened is that holes that have existed since the beginning 
are only in the past few years been brought into the mainstream 
spotlight. It's going to take a few more years for the avg joe to evolve 
or die, or the software to start doing things right (which no one, not 
even OSS that gets active patching, is doing more than 80% right).

We need less functionality, more security. The opposite of what we've 
had in the past 25 or so years. People should have to learn a bit how 
things work before being let loose in the wild.

There was a time when I would not have thought twice about setting up a 
public facing service as long as it was passworded. At the time the 
worst thing going on was by default file sharing was turned on or the 
winnuke/OOB bug. Now it's to the point where putting anything up, even 
behind counter-measures and tricks like port-knocking, you still run a 
high risk of having a exploitable service due to programming flaws. 
Worse, a lot of these tricks are kludges or require hoping through hoops 
to implement and may even break normal functionality.

Spam is a problem that no law can solve since spammers just move 
elsewhere. Server based white/black/neutral-listing can be a boon to 
customers savvy enough to use them, though would not stop the source of 
spam nor take the load off the mail servers.

One thing that would be a good idea IMHO is if providers only allowed 
customer who request SMTP ability get it and then only by proxy. 
Combined with an anti-UCBE AUP/TOS the ISP would masquerade the proxied 
customer SMTP to appear to come from the ISP's servers (lodgenet does 
this for all SMTP). All ISP's would have to register (and thus agree to 
abide by the rules) their mail servers with  check destinations against 
a central clearing house of official servers (like we have for domain 
names now). With that in place and everyone keeping their own house 
straight, it would be much easier to shutdown a source, 1st at the ISP 
level or worst case the ISP's subnet's could be blacklisted until they 
do comply  enforce.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message - From: Bobby Heid [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: HardwareGroup hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Sent: Friday, May 06, 2005 7:46 AM
Subject: [H] New batch of spam mails on RR account

Hey all,
Just in the past few days, I have gotten probably 100 emails that look
similar with many of them containing viruses.  My email address is not in
the to: list.  How do I get them if I am not in the to: list?  Anyone 
else
getting these lately?

I am getting junk like this, also. 5 years ago I predicted the hackers 
would take down the Internet. In a sense, they have. Internet users have 
about the same freedom of a high profile dignatary that has to stay 
around bodyguards to keep from being killed. Using the Internet is like 
life on the street, requiring more and more security each year. Some 
claim they have not beefed up their personal security in the past 5 
years. Public security to protect them (airlines and all public 
gatherings) gets beefed up constantly. This lowers the standard of 
living for everyone. Example: Some have to forgo the new large screen 
television to buy a new home alarm system. This is not off topic if used 
in context to illustrate that these spam emails you and I are discussing 
are taking their toll on the freedom and ease of use of the Internet.

Chuck




Re: [H] New batch of spam mails on RR account

2005-05-06 Thread FORC5


I have asked the same question, it has been explained to me
several time but I still do not get it. perhaps its like sometimes even
my USPS mailbox has some one else's mail :{(
At 04:46 AM 5/6/2005, Bobby Heid Poked the stick with:
Hey all,
Just in the past few days, I have gotten probably 100 emails that
look
similar with many of them containing viruses. My email address is
not in
the to: list. How do I get them if I am not in the to: list?
Anyone else
getting these lately? 

-- 
Tallyho ! ]:8)
--
Yup it's done! Yay! Moo! ]:8)




Re: [H] Weird one

2005-05-06 Thread JRS

Since it's only that one site, is there by chance an ActiveX or Javascript
applet needed for that site that your new re-build does not now have?  

Or perhaps it needs a newer version of IE that the old build had from an
update along the way?





I have a Latitude at work that some how got some viruses, over 300 files
were infected. Needless to say I nuke the install and formatted the drive
and reinstalled windows. It is a PII and only 64MB Ram so 98 was in order
again. Everything is fine with the install, had the drivers for everything
and used a PMCIA network card to install all updates and so forth thru
Windows Update and have a problem with a particular page and the mouse.
It has a synaptic touch pad and also a PS2 mouse for the weenies. I can
connect to the internet with both the buildings network (Wells Fargo with a
proxy) and our Dial Up/VPN to get out to the outside world. I can surf and
connect to all kinds of sites and use our proprietary system to connect thru
a terminal server to a inventory management software, all works...BUTTT
We have an Intranet site that we need to access for expense reporting and
timesheets. When I go into and log onto the Intranet the mouse is no longer
available. The cursor moves but does not activate by clicks. I can tab thru
the page, a big pain in the ass, but can not click on anything with the
mouse or the touch pad, either together or each individually. It is the only
thing that is a problem.
Any Ideas???
I have re-installed the latest and not so latest drivers for both and the
video drivers and even made sure that there was no conflict with IRQ's and
such.

Mark Dodge
MD Computers
602-421-0329 

-- 

JRS   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please remove  **X**  to reply...

Facts do not cease to exist just
because they are ignored.


Re: [H] New batch of spam mails on RR account

2005-05-06 Thread Christopher Fisk
On Fri, 6 May 2005, FORC5 wrote:
Hey all,
Just in the past few days, I have gotten probably 100 emails that look
similar with many of them containing viruses.  My email address is not in
the to: list.  How do I get them if I am not in the to: list?  Anyone else
getting these lately?
When email is sent across the internet it comes with an envelope  just 
like the USPS, mail servers only really care about what is on the envelope 
of the message.

I could stuff a letter to my aunt into an envelope, complete with To: 
Auntie Fisk at the top of the message, thanking her for her wonderful 
cookies.  Then stuff that letter into an envelope and address the envelope 
to the Governer of New York State.

That letter will be delivered to the gov.
In SMTP the server removes the envelope and just delivered the email 
message, so it would be similar to an assistant opening the envelope and 
the gov sitting down and reading the letter to my aunt and asking himself 
WTF.

Hope that analogy helps,
Christopher Fisk
--
BOFH Excuse #409:
The vulcan-death-grip ping has been applied.


[H] Broadcast flag tossed out by federal appeals court

2005-05-06 Thread Bobby Heid
http://news.com.com/Court+says+FCCs+broadcast+flag+is+toast/2100-1030_3-5697
719.html

http://tinyurl.com/9xqa3



Re: [H] Broadcast flag tossed out by federal appeals court

2005-05-06 Thread warpmedia
Ah, a bit of sanity from the courts. Now let's see if this survives the 
next level!

Bet there's more than a few hardware companies breathing easier now that 
their revenue stream is not threatened.

Bobby Heid wrote:
http://news.com.com/Court+says+FCCs+broadcast+flag+is+toast/2100-1030_3-5697
719.html
http://tinyurl.com/9xqa3




[H] IE problem with Hotmail

2005-05-06 Thread Thane Sherrington
I'm working on an WinME machine that refuses to load Hotmail in IE.  I can 
get to the login page and put in the login info, but when I click the 
submit button, I get a blank page that says done at the bottom.  Firefox 
works fine.  I tried resetting IE settings, and re-installed Windows 
script, but no change.   Anyone see this before?

T
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Anti-Virus]


[H] Dual layer DVDRW?

2005-05-06 Thread Thane Sherrington
Are they available yet?  I can only find single layer DVDRWs.
T
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Anti-Virus]


Re: [H] IE problem with Hotmail

2005-05-06 Thread Thane Sherrington
At 03:27 PM 06/05/2005, Thane Sherrington wrote:
I'm working on an WinME machine that refuses to load Hotmail in IE.  I can 
get to the login page and put in the login info, but when I click the 
submit button, I get a blank page that says done at the bottom.  Firefox 
works fine.  I tried resetting IE settings, and re-installed Windows 
script, but no change.   Anyone see this before?
Deleting IE with IEradicator and reinstalling it seems to have fixed the 
problem.

T 

---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Anti-Virus]


[H] Anybody record this?

2005-05-06 Thread Winterlight
Enron:smartest guys in the room, Premiered on HDNet Movie Channel last 
friday nite at 8pm ET and aired again at 11pm ET. 13

If anybody recorded this please back channel me. Thanks!


Re: [H] Dual layer DVDRW?

2005-05-06 Thread Wayne Johnson
At 02:39 PM 5/6/2005, Thane Sherrington typed:
Are they available yet?  I can only find single layer DVDRWs.
You can get a Pioneer 109 at Mwave.com for only 68 USD. You can see it at 
the Pioneer web site 
http://www.pioneerelectronics.com/pna/product/detail/0,,2076_103674852_207918120,00.html

--+--
   Wayne D. Johnson
Ashland, OH, USA 44805
http://www.wavijo.com 



Re: [H] Dual layer DVDRW?

2005-05-06 Thread Greg Sevart
Negative. Only this last week did Verbatim announce they were shipping DVD-R 
DL media. Nobody knows for sure if DVDRW DL will ever appear.

Even if they did, would it really be worth $15-20 per disc? DVD+R DL has 
only fallen to $7/disc so far...

Greg
- Original Message - 
From: Thane Sherrington [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Sent: Friday, May 06, 2005 1:39 PM
Subject: [H] Dual layer DVDRW?


Are they available yet?  I can only find single layer DVDRWs.
T
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Anti-Virus]




Re: [H] Dual layer DVDRW?

2005-05-06 Thread Thane Sherrington
At 03:57 PM 06/05/2005, Wayne Johnson wrote:
At 02:39 PM 5/6/2005, Thane Sherrington typed:
Are they available yet?  I can only find single layer DVDRWs.
You can get a Pioneer 109 at Mwave.com for only 68 USD. You can see it at 
the Pioneer web site 
http://www.pioneerelectronics.com/pna/product/detail/0,,2076_103674852_207918120,00.html
Sorry, meant the disks not the drive.
T 

---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Anti-Virus]


RE: [H] Dual layer DVDRW?

2005-05-06 Thread Mark Dodge
I got three Verbatim's at Fry's for 19.99 and burned the first Deadwood disc
to it and it will not play on either of my Sony's (S530D and NS 315) but OK
in my laptop and desktop. I don't know if it was worth it or not. I haven't
a clue what I'm going to do with the other two yet. This was from an ISO,
maybe I'll try to copy a large DVD and see if it plays in one of my players.
I think Gladiator is over 8 megs.


Mark Dodge
MD Computers
602-421-0329 
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thane Sherrington
Sent: Friday, May 06, 2005 12:54 PM
To: The Hardware List
Subject: Re: [H] Dual layer DVDRW?

At 03:55 PM 06/05/2005, Greg Sevart wrote:
Negative. Only this last week did Verbatim announce they were shipping 
DVD-R DL media. Nobody knows for sure if DVDRW DL will ever appear.

Even if they did, would it really be worth $15-20 per disc? DVD+R DL 
has only fallen to $7/disc so far...

For backups it'd be worth it.

T 

---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Anti-Virus]



Re: [H] Dual layer DVDRW?

2005-05-06 Thread G.Waleed Kavalec
over 8 megs - wow!  ;-)

On 5/6/05, Mark Dodge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I got three Verbatim's at Fry's for 19.99 and burned the first Deadwood disc
 to it and it will not play on either of my Sony's (S530D and NS 315) but OK
 in my laptop and desktop. I don't know if it was worth it or not. I haven't
 a clue what I'm going to do with the other two yet. This was from an ISO,
 maybe I'll try to copy a large DVD and see if it plays in one of my players.
 I think Gladiator is over 8 megs.
 
 
 Mark Dodge
 MD Computers
 602-421-0329
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thane Sherrington
 Sent: Friday, May 06, 2005 12:54 PM
 To: The Hardware List
 Subject: Re: [H] Dual layer DVDRW?
 
 At 03:55 PM 06/05/2005, Greg Sevart wrote:
 Negative. Only this last week did Verbatim announce they were shipping
 DVD-R DL media. Nobody knows for sure if DVDRW DL will ever appear.
 
 Even if they did, would it really be worth $15-20 per disc? DVD+R DL
 has only fallen to $7/disc so far...
 
 For backups it'd be worth it.
 
 T
 
 ---
 [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Anti-Virus]
 
 


-- 
 

G. Waleed Kavalec
---
Copyright:  G. Waleed Kavalec 2005
This message may be resent and/or repuplished 
provided the content and this notice are kept intact.



Re: [H] Dual layer DVDRW?

2005-05-06 Thread Christopher Fisk
On Fri, 6 May 2005, G.Waleed Kavalec wrote:
over 8 megs - wow!  ;-)
You have any idea how many floppies that is?  (well, I'm pretty sure the 
Gladiator DVD is over 8 megs, I would be stunned if it weren't)


Christopher Fisk
--
Thank you. before I begin, I'd like everyone to notice that my report is in
a professional, clear plastic binder...When a report looks this good, you know
it'll get an A. That's a tip kids. Write it down. -- Calvin


RE: [H] Dual layer DVDRW?

2005-05-06 Thread Mark Dodge
Of course I meant gigs..LOL 


Mark Dodge
MD Computers
602-421-0329 
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of G.Waleed Kavalec
Sent: Friday, May 06, 2005 1:12 PM
To: The Hardware List
Subject: Re: [H] Dual layer DVDRW?

over 8 megs - wow!  ;-)

On 5/6/05, Mark Dodge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I got three Verbatim's at Fry's for 19.99 and burned the first 
 Deadwood disc to it and it will not play on either of my Sony's (S530D 
 and NS 315) but OK in my laptop and desktop. I don't know if it was 
 worth it or not. I haven't a clue what I'm going to do with the other 
 two yet. This was from an ISO, maybe I'll try to copy a large DVD and see
if it plays in one of my players.
 I think Gladiator is over 8 megs.
 
 
 Mark Dodge
 MD Computers
 602-421-0329
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thane 
 Sherrington
 Sent: Friday, May 06, 2005 12:54 PM
 To: The Hardware List
 Subject: Re: [H] Dual layer DVDRW?
 
 At 03:55 PM 06/05/2005, Greg Sevart wrote:
 Negative. Only this last week did Verbatim announce they were 
 shipping DVD-R DL media. Nobody knows for sure if DVDRW DL will ever
appear.
 
 Even if they did, would it really be worth $15-20 per disc? DVD+R DL 
 has only fallen to $7/disc so far...
 
 For backups it'd be worth it.
 
 T
 
 ---
 [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Anti-Virus]
 
 


-- 
 

G. Waleed Kavalec
---
Copyright:  G. Waleed Kavalec 2005
This message may be resent and/or repuplished provided the content and this
notice are kept intact.



Re: [H] Dual layer DVDRW?

2005-05-06 Thread G.Waleed Kavalec
On 5/6/05, Christopher Fisk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Fri, 6 May 2005, G.Waleed Kavalec wrote:
 
  over 8 megs - wow!  ;-)
 
 You have any idea how many floppies that is?  (well, I'm pretty sure the
 Gladiator DVD is over 8 megs, I would be stunned if it weren't)


It's that new single-bit compression algorithm.



Re: [H] Dual layer DVDRW?

2005-05-06 Thread Greg Sevart
Temporal smoother, bilinear resize to 10 pixels by 6 pixels, and xvid 
compression. No audio.
Does wonders. :)

Greg
- Original Message - 
From: G.Waleed Kavalec [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Christopher Fisk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: The Hardware List hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Sent: Friday, May 06, 2005 3:47 PM
Subject: Re: [H] Dual layer DVDRW?


On 5/6/05, Christopher Fisk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 6 May 2005, G.Waleed Kavalec wrote:
 over 8 megs - wow!  ;-)
You have any idea how many floppies that is?  (well, I'm pretty sure the
Gladiator DVD is over 8 megs, I would be stunned if it weren't)

It's that new single-bit compression algorithm.




RE: [H] Dual layer DVDRW?

2005-05-06 Thread Mark Dodge
It is so it can be played on a cell phone.. 


Mark Dodge
MD Computers
602-421-0329 
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Sevart
Sent: Friday, May 06, 2005 2:00 PM
To: The Hardware List
Subject: Re: [H] Dual layer DVDRW?

Temporal smoother, bilinear resize to 10 pixels by 6 pixels, and xvid
compression. No audio.
Does wonders. :)

Greg

- Original Message -
From: G.Waleed Kavalec [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Christopher Fisk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: The Hardware List hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Sent: Friday, May 06, 2005 3:47 PM
Subject: Re: [H] Dual layer DVDRW?


 On 5/6/05, Christopher Fisk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Fri, 6 May 2005, G.Waleed Kavalec wrote:

  over 8 megs - wow!  ;-)

 You have any idea how many floppies that is?  (well, I'm pretty sure the
 Gladiator DVD is over 8 megs, I would be stunned if it weren't)


 It's that new single-bit compression algorithm.