[H] bigpantsmouse
http://www.bigpantsmouse.com/home.html Al
RE: [H] New MS rule
It'll either make people upgrade or make people use a fake/pirated/stolen number. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thane Sherrington Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2005 9:57 AM To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com Subject: [H] New MS rule This is lovely. The new MS rule on regenerating Auth numbers for people with CDs and lost numbers. You fax in a proof of purchase (must be a receipt) and pay then $15 and if you call the US number, they'll generate the number and call back in FOUR WEEKS! Here in Canada, it's FOUR to SIX weeks! So if you've lost your auth number, you're screwed. Does anyone see this as simply a drive to make people to upgrade to XP.
[H] New batch of spam mails on RR account
Hey all, Just in the past few days, I have gotten probably 100 emails that look similar with many of them containing viruses. My email address is not in the to: list. How do I get them if I am not in the to: list? Anyone else getting these lately? There are about 4-5 variants of this email. This one has a subject of 'Mailing error.' Some talk about a registration code, etc. I have included the headers from the original email, followed by the actual email after my sig. Thanks, Bobby Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from ms-mta-01-eri0 (ms-mta-01-eri0 [10.25.8.234]) by ms-mss-04.southeast.rr.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.04 (built Feb 8 2005)) with ESMTP id [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 05 May 2005 22:59:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: from kcmx03.mgw.rr.com (kcmx03.mgw.rr.com [24.94.165.192]) by ms-mta-01.southeast.rr.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.04 (built Feb 8 2005)) with ESMTP id [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 05 May 2005 22:59:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: from orngca-mx-01.mgw.rr.com (orngca-mx-01.mgw.rr.com [66.75.160.128]) by kcmx03.mgw.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j462qTER024543; Thu, 05 May 2005 22:59:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rrcs-24-172-237-94.midsouth.biz.rr.com (HELO aibdqdjg.com) (24.172.237.94) by orngca-mx-01.mgw.rr.com with SMTP; Thu, 05 May 2005 22:58:46 -0400 Date: Fri, 06 May 2005 02:56:26 + (UTC) From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: mailing error To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: AnonMail_Version 6.92 Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary==fb083b51dc9d0ac9 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Importance: Normal X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-priority: Normal X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine X-Virus-Scan-Result: Repaired 36048 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2005 10:56 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: mailing error This is an automatically generated E-Mail Delivery Status Notification. Mail-Header, Mail-Body and Error Description are attached
Re: [H] New batch of spam mails on RR account
Can't answer you question...but don't you block these on the server and delete from there? just curious as to how folks deal with spamme, I never let them get to my PC...so virus protection is a nonissue... Bobby Heid wrote: Hey all, Just in the past few days, I have gotten probably 100 emails that look similar with many of them containing viruses. My email address is not in the to: list. How do I get them if I am not in the to: list? Anyone else getting these lately? There are about 4-5 variants of this email. This one has a subject of 'Mailing error.' Some talk about a registration code, etc. I have included the headers from the original email, followed by the actual email after my sig.
RE: [H] New batch of spam mails on RR account
This is a road runner account. So I don't get to handle the server. RR does block some spam (I usually get very little spam at home). NAV cleans the viruses from these emails. I am just curious as to the number of them just recently and the fact that they do not appear to be to me. Bobby -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Anthony Q. Martin Sent: Friday, May 06, 2005 7:51 AM To: The Hardware List Subject: Re: [H] New batch of spam mails on RR account Can't answer you question...but don't you block these on the server and delete from there? just curious as to how folks deal with spamme, I never let them get to my PC...so virus protection is a nonissue...
Re: [H] New batch of spam mails on RR account
- Original Message - From: Bobby Heid [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: HardwareGroup hardware@hardwaregroup.com Sent: Friday, May 06, 2005 7:46 AM Subject: [H] New batch of spam mails on RR account Hey all, Just in the past few days, I have gotten probably 100 emails that look similar with many of them containing viruses. My email address is not in the to: list. How do I get them if I am not in the to: list? Anyone else getting these lately? I am getting junk like this, also. 5 years ago I predicted the hackers would take down the Internet. In a sense, they have. Internet users have about the same freedom of a high profile dignatary that has to stay around bodyguards to keep from being killed. Using the Internet is like life on the street, requiring more and more security each year. Some claim they have not beefed up their personal security in the past 5 years. Public security to protect them (airlines and all public gatherings) gets beefed up constantly. This lowers the standard of living for everyone. Example: Some have to forgo the new large screen television to buy a new home alarm system. This is not off topic if used in context to illustrate that these spam emails you and I are discussing are taking their toll on the freedom and ease of use of the Internet. Chuck
Re: [H] New batch of spam mails on RR account
A good approach that I've been using for a few years is to limit the size of email that you d/l to under 4K. You'll know it's spam, just won't know if it's a virus since not enough comes down to set off the AV scanner. Caveat is wanted email w/ more than 4096 characters has to be d/l OTF. Anthony Q. Martin wrote: Can't answer you question...but don't you block these on the server and delete from there? just curious as to how folks deal with spamme, I never let them get to my PC...so virus protection is a nonissue... Bobby Heid wrote: Hey all, Just in the past few days, I have gotten probably 100 emails that look similar with many of them containing viruses. My email address is not in the to: list. How do I get them if I am not in the to: list? Anyone else getting these lately? There are about 4-5 variants of this email. This one has a subject of 'Mailing error.' Some talk about a registration code, etc. I have included the headers from the original email, followed by the actual email after my sig.
Re: [H] Weird one
Mark, If everything works but that one site, and the mouse moves around but does not click on that one site, I'd bet that it is something with that site that is causing the problem. Have you tried a different browser? Mark Dodge wrote: I have a Latitude at work that some how got some viruses, over 300 files were infected. Needless to say I nuke the install and formatted the drive and reinstalled windows. It is a PII and only 64MB Ram so 98 was in order again. Everything is fine with the install, had the drivers for everything and used a PMCIA network card to install all updates and so forth thru Windows Update and have a problem with a particular page and the mouse. It has a synaptic touch pad and also a PS2 mouse for the weenies. I can connect to the internet with both the buildings network (Wells Fargo with a proxy) and our Dial Up/VPN to get out to the outside world. I can surf and connect to all kinds of sites and use our proprietary system to connect thru a terminal server to a inventory management software, all works...BUTTT We have an Intranet site that we need to access for expense reporting and timesheets. When I go into and log onto the Intranet the mouse is no longer available. The cursor moves but does not activate by clicks. I can tab thru the page, a big pain in the ass, but can not click on anything with the mouse or the touch pad, either together or each individually. It is the only thing that is a problem. Any Ideas??? I have re-installed the latest and not so latest drivers for both and the video drivers and even made sure that there was no conflict with IRQ's and such. Mark Dodge MD Computers 602-421-0329
RE: [H] New batch of spam mails on RR account
It's part of the new Win32-Sober virus. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of warpmedia Sent: Friday, May 06, 2005 7:17 AM To: The Hardware List Subject: Re: [H] New batch of spam mails on RR account A good approach that I've been using for a few years is to limit the size of email that you d/l to under 4K. You'll know it's spam, just won't know if it's a virus since not enough comes down to set off the AV scanner. Caveat is wanted email w/ more than 4096 characters has to be d/l OTF. Anthony Q. Martin wrote: Can't answer you question...but don't you block these on the server and delete from there? just curious as to how folks deal with spamme, I never let them get to my PC...so virus protection is a nonissue... Bobby Heid wrote: Hey all, Just in the past few days, I have gotten probably 100 emails that look similar with many of them containing viruses. My email address is not in the to: list. How do I get them if I am not in the to: list? Anyone else getting these lately? There are about 4-5 variants of this email. This one has a subject of 'Mailing error.' Some talk about a registration code, etc. I have included the headers from the original email, followed by the actual email after my sig.
Re: [H] New batch of spam mails on RR account
I guess I agree with you in a sense. What has happened is that holes that have existed since the beginning are only in the past few years been brought into the mainstream spotlight. It's going to take a few more years for the avg joe to evolve or die, or the software to start doing things right (which no one, not even OSS that gets active patching, is doing more than 80% right). We need less functionality, more security. The opposite of what we've had in the past 25 or so years. People should have to learn a bit how things work before being let loose in the wild. There was a time when I would not have thought twice about setting up a public facing service as long as it was passworded. At the time the worst thing going on was by default file sharing was turned on or the winnuke/OOB bug. Now it's to the point where putting anything up, even behind counter-measures and tricks like port-knocking, you still run a high risk of having a exploitable service due to programming flaws. Worse, a lot of these tricks are kludges or require hoping through hoops to implement and may even break normal functionality. Spam is a problem that no law can solve since spammers just move elsewhere. Server based white/black/neutral-listing can be a boon to customers savvy enough to use them, though would not stop the source of spam nor take the load off the mail servers. One thing that would be a good idea IMHO is if providers only allowed customer who request SMTP ability get it and then only by proxy. Combined with an anti-UCBE AUP/TOS the ISP would masquerade the proxied customer SMTP to appear to come from the ISP's servers (lodgenet does this for all SMTP). All ISP's would have to register (and thus agree to abide by the rules) their mail servers with check destinations against a central clearing house of official servers (like we have for domain names now). With that in place and everyone keeping their own house straight, it would be much easier to shutdown a source, 1st at the ISP level or worst case the ISP's subnet's could be blacklisted until they do comply enforce. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - Original Message - From: Bobby Heid [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: HardwareGroup hardware@hardwaregroup.com Sent: Friday, May 06, 2005 7:46 AM Subject: [H] New batch of spam mails on RR account Hey all, Just in the past few days, I have gotten probably 100 emails that look similar with many of them containing viruses. My email address is not in the to: list. How do I get them if I am not in the to: list? Anyone else getting these lately? I am getting junk like this, also. 5 years ago I predicted the hackers would take down the Internet. In a sense, they have. Internet users have about the same freedom of a high profile dignatary that has to stay around bodyguards to keep from being killed. Using the Internet is like life on the street, requiring more and more security each year. Some claim they have not beefed up their personal security in the past 5 years. Public security to protect them (airlines and all public gatherings) gets beefed up constantly. This lowers the standard of living for everyone. Example: Some have to forgo the new large screen television to buy a new home alarm system. This is not off topic if used in context to illustrate that these spam emails you and I are discussing are taking their toll on the freedom and ease of use of the Internet. Chuck
Re: [H] New batch of spam mails on RR account
I have asked the same question, it has been explained to me several time but I still do not get it. perhaps its like sometimes even my USPS mailbox has some one else's mail :{( At 04:46 AM 5/6/2005, Bobby Heid Poked the stick with: Hey all, Just in the past few days, I have gotten probably 100 emails that look similar with many of them containing viruses. My email address is not in the to: list. How do I get them if I am not in the to: list? Anyone else getting these lately? -- Tallyho ! ]:8) -- Yup it's done! Yay! Moo! ]:8)
Re: [H] Weird one
Since it's only that one site, is there by chance an ActiveX or Javascript applet needed for that site that your new re-build does not now have? Or perhaps it needs a newer version of IE that the old build had from an update along the way? I have a Latitude at work that some how got some viruses, over 300 files were infected. Needless to say I nuke the install and formatted the drive and reinstalled windows. It is a PII and only 64MB Ram so 98 was in order again. Everything is fine with the install, had the drivers for everything and used a PMCIA network card to install all updates and so forth thru Windows Update and have a problem with a particular page and the mouse. It has a synaptic touch pad and also a PS2 mouse for the weenies. I can connect to the internet with both the buildings network (Wells Fargo with a proxy) and our Dial Up/VPN to get out to the outside world. I can surf and connect to all kinds of sites and use our proprietary system to connect thru a terminal server to a inventory management software, all works...BUTTT We have an Intranet site that we need to access for expense reporting and timesheets. When I go into and log onto the Intranet the mouse is no longer available. The cursor moves but does not activate by clicks. I can tab thru the page, a big pain in the ass, but can not click on anything with the mouse or the touch pad, either together or each individually. It is the only thing that is a problem. Any Ideas??? I have re-installed the latest and not so latest drivers for both and the video drivers and even made sure that there was no conflict with IRQ's and such. Mark Dodge MD Computers 602-421-0329 -- JRS [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please remove **X** to reply... Facts do not cease to exist just because they are ignored.
Re: [H] New batch of spam mails on RR account
On Fri, 6 May 2005, FORC5 wrote: Hey all, Just in the past few days, I have gotten probably 100 emails that look similar with many of them containing viruses. My email address is not in the to: list. How do I get them if I am not in the to: list? Anyone else getting these lately? When email is sent across the internet it comes with an envelope just like the USPS, mail servers only really care about what is on the envelope of the message. I could stuff a letter to my aunt into an envelope, complete with To: Auntie Fisk at the top of the message, thanking her for her wonderful cookies. Then stuff that letter into an envelope and address the envelope to the Governer of New York State. That letter will be delivered to the gov. In SMTP the server removes the envelope and just delivered the email message, so it would be similar to an assistant opening the envelope and the gov sitting down and reading the letter to my aunt and asking himself WTF. Hope that analogy helps, Christopher Fisk -- BOFH Excuse #409: The vulcan-death-grip ping has been applied.
[H] Broadcast flag tossed out by federal appeals court
http://news.com.com/Court+says+FCCs+broadcast+flag+is+toast/2100-1030_3-5697 719.html http://tinyurl.com/9xqa3
Re: [H] Broadcast flag tossed out by federal appeals court
Ah, a bit of sanity from the courts. Now let's see if this survives the next level! Bet there's more than a few hardware companies breathing easier now that their revenue stream is not threatened. Bobby Heid wrote: http://news.com.com/Court+says+FCCs+broadcast+flag+is+toast/2100-1030_3-5697 719.html http://tinyurl.com/9xqa3
[H] IE problem with Hotmail
I'm working on an WinME machine that refuses to load Hotmail in IE. I can get to the login page and put in the login info, but when I click the submit button, I get a blank page that says done at the bottom. Firefox works fine. I tried resetting IE settings, and re-installed Windows script, but no change. Anyone see this before? T --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Anti-Virus]
[H] Dual layer DVDRW?
Are they available yet? I can only find single layer DVDRWs. T --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Anti-Virus]
Re: [H] IE problem with Hotmail
At 03:27 PM 06/05/2005, Thane Sherrington wrote: I'm working on an WinME machine that refuses to load Hotmail in IE. I can get to the login page and put in the login info, but when I click the submit button, I get a blank page that says done at the bottom. Firefox works fine. I tried resetting IE settings, and re-installed Windows script, but no change. Anyone see this before? Deleting IE with IEradicator and reinstalling it seems to have fixed the problem. T --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Anti-Virus]
[H] Anybody record this?
Enron:smartest guys in the room, Premiered on HDNet Movie Channel last friday nite at 8pm ET and aired again at 11pm ET. 13 If anybody recorded this please back channel me. Thanks!
Re: [H] Dual layer DVDRW?
At 02:39 PM 5/6/2005, Thane Sherrington typed: Are they available yet? I can only find single layer DVDRWs. You can get a Pioneer 109 at Mwave.com for only 68 USD. You can see it at the Pioneer web site http://www.pioneerelectronics.com/pna/product/detail/0,,2076_103674852_207918120,00.html --+-- Wayne D. Johnson Ashland, OH, USA 44805 http://www.wavijo.com
Re: [H] Dual layer DVDRW?
Negative. Only this last week did Verbatim announce they were shipping DVD-R DL media. Nobody knows for sure if DVDRW DL will ever appear. Even if they did, would it really be worth $15-20 per disc? DVD+R DL has only fallen to $7/disc so far... Greg - Original Message - From: Thane Sherrington [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com Sent: Friday, May 06, 2005 1:39 PM Subject: [H] Dual layer DVDRW? Are they available yet? I can only find single layer DVDRWs. T --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Anti-Virus]
Re: [H] Dual layer DVDRW?
At 03:57 PM 06/05/2005, Wayne Johnson wrote: At 02:39 PM 5/6/2005, Thane Sherrington typed: Are they available yet? I can only find single layer DVDRWs. You can get a Pioneer 109 at Mwave.com for only 68 USD. You can see it at the Pioneer web site http://www.pioneerelectronics.com/pna/product/detail/0,,2076_103674852_207918120,00.html Sorry, meant the disks not the drive. T --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Anti-Virus]
RE: [H] Dual layer DVDRW?
I got three Verbatim's at Fry's for 19.99 and burned the first Deadwood disc to it and it will not play on either of my Sony's (S530D and NS 315) but OK in my laptop and desktop. I don't know if it was worth it or not. I haven't a clue what I'm going to do with the other two yet. This was from an ISO, maybe I'll try to copy a large DVD and see if it plays in one of my players. I think Gladiator is over 8 megs. Mark Dodge MD Computers 602-421-0329 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thane Sherrington Sent: Friday, May 06, 2005 12:54 PM To: The Hardware List Subject: Re: [H] Dual layer DVDRW? At 03:55 PM 06/05/2005, Greg Sevart wrote: Negative. Only this last week did Verbatim announce they were shipping DVD-R DL media. Nobody knows for sure if DVDRW DL will ever appear. Even if they did, would it really be worth $15-20 per disc? DVD+R DL has only fallen to $7/disc so far... For backups it'd be worth it. T --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Anti-Virus]
Re: [H] Dual layer DVDRW?
over 8 megs - wow! ;-) On 5/6/05, Mark Dodge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I got three Verbatim's at Fry's for 19.99 and burned the first Deadwood disc to it and it will not play on either of my Sony's (S530D and NS 315) but OK in my laptop and desktop. I don't know if it was worth it or not. I haven't a clue what I'm going to do with the other two yet. This was from an ISO, maybe I'll try to copy a large DVD and see if it plays in one of my players. I think Gladiator is over 8 megs. Mark Dodge MD Computers 602-421-0329 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thane Sherrington Sent: Friday, May 06, 2005 12:54 PM To: The Hardware List Subject: Re: [H] Dual layer DVDRW? At 03:55 PM 06/05/2005, Greg Sevart wrote: Negative. Only this last week did Verbatim announce they were shipping DVD-R DL media. Nobody knows for sure if DVDRW DL will ever appear. Even if they did, would it really be worth $15-20 per disc? DVD+R DL has only fallen to $7/disc so far... For backups it'd be worth it. T --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Anti-Virus] -- G. Waleed Kavalec --- Copyright: G. Waleed Kavalec 2005 This message may be resent and/or repuplished provided the content and this notice are kept intact.
Re: [H] Dual layer DVDRW?
On Fri, 6 May 2005, G.Waleed Kavalec wrote: over 8 megs - wow! ;-) You have any idea how many floppies that is? (well, I'm pretty sure the Gladiator DVD is over 8 megs, I would be stunned if it weren't) Christopher Fisk -- Thank you. before I begin, I'd like everyone to notice that my report is in a professional, clear plastic binder...When a report looks this good, you know it'll get an A. That's a tip kids. Write it down. -- Calvin
RE: [H] Dual layer DVDRW?
Of course I meant gigs..LOL Mark Dodge MD Computers 602-421-0329 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of G.Waleed Kavalec Sent: Friday, May 06, 2005 1:12 PM To: The Hardware List Subject: Re: [H] Dual layer DVDRW? over 8 megs - wow! ;-) On 5/6/05, Mark Dodge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I got three Verbatim's at Fry's for 19.99 and burned the first Deadwood disc to it and it will not play on either of my Sony's (S530D and NS 315) but OK in my laptop and desktop. I don't know if it was worth it or not. I haven't a clue what I'm going to do with the other two yet. This was from an ISO, maybe I'll try to copy a large DVD and see if it plays in one of my players. I think Gladiator is over 8 megs. Mark Dodge MD Computers 602-421-0329 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thane Sherrington Sent: Friday, May 06, 2005 12:54 PM To: The Hardware List Subject: Re: [H] Dual layer DVDRW? At 03:55 PM 06/05/2005, Greg Sevart wrote: Negative. Only this last week did Verbatim announce they were shipping DVD-R DL media. Nobody knows for sure if DVDRW DL will ever appear. Even if they did, would it really be worth $15-20 per disc? DVD+R DL has only fallen to $7/disc so far... For backups it'd be worth it. T --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Anti-Virus] -- G. Waleed Kavalec --- Copyright: G. Waleed Kavalec 2005 This message may be resent and/or repuplished provided the content and this notice are kept intact.
Re: [H] Dual layer DVDRW?
On 5/6/05, Christopher Fisk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 6 May 2005, G.Waleed Kavalec wrote: over 8 megs - wow! ;-) You have any idea how many floppies that is? (well, I'm pretty sure the Gladiator DVD is over 8 megs, I would be stunned if it weren't) It's that new single-bit compression algorithm.
Re: [H] Dual layer DVDRW?
Temporal smoother, bilinear resize to 10 pixels by 6 pixels, and xvid compression. No audio. Does wonders. :) Greg - Original Message - From: G.Waleed Kavalec [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Christopher Fisk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: The Hardware List hardware@hardwaregroup.com Sent: Friday, May 06, 2005 3:47 PM Subject: Re: [H] Dual layer DVDRW? On 5/6/05, Christopher Fisk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 6 May 2005, G.Waleed Kavalec wrote: over 8 megs - wow! ;-) You have any idea how many floppies that is? (well, I'm pretty sure the Gladiator DVD is over 8 megs, I would be stunned if it weren't) It's that new single-bit compression algorithm.
RE: [H] Dual layer DVDRW?
It is so it can be played on a cell phone.. Mark Dodge MD Computers 602-421-0329 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Sevart Sent: Friday, May 06, 2005 2:00 PM To: The Hardware List Subject: Re: [H] Dual layer DVDRW? Temporal smoother, bilinear resize to 10 pixels by 6 pixels, and xvid compression. No audio. Does wonders. :) Greg - Original Message - From: G.Waleed Kavalec [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Christopher Fisk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: The Hardware List hardware@hardwaregroup.com Sent: Friday, May 06, 2005 3:47 PM Subject: Re: [H] Dual layer DVDRW? On 5/6/05, Christopher Fisk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 6 May 2005, G.Waleed Kavalec wrote: over 8 megs - wow! ;-) You have any idea how many floppies that is? (well, I'm pretty sure the Gladiator DVD is over 8 megs, I would be stunned if it weren't) It's that new single-bit compression algorithm.