RE: [H] VISTA Ultimate

[Greg Sevart]

Been running Vista x64 for about 10 weeks now...it isn't perfect, but the
minor tweaks and enhancements make it hard for me to use my work XP machine.

I do find it interesting that the maximum rating is 5.9. Some scores are
fixed based on hardware...a pre-DX9 video card gets a 1.0, there are maximum
values for given amounts of system RAM, etc.

This box has an overall of 5.8...
5.8 on CPU (E6400 at 3.2GHz on a NF 680i)
5.9 on memory (4GB at PC1066)
5.9 for both graphics and gaming graphics (7900GS with a factory OC)
5.9 HD (WD1500ADFD)

This is really just an interim platform until Barcelona and Penryn are
released later this year. My X2 was fine, but I was just itching for an
upgrade.

Supposedly MS will increase the maximum range with updates as Vista ages,
but it seems odd to me that relatively unimpressive hardware can max the
current scale values.

Greg

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:hardware-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of JRS
> Sent: Monday, February 26, 2007 10:55 PM
> To: The Hardware List
> Subject: Re: [H] VISTA Ultimate
> 
> Mine's doing OK with Vista as well,
> 
> Used the excuse of Vista coming out to buy my 1st new PC in 2-3 years
> 
> Intel Badaxe 975 Xpress chipset mobo  (D975XBX2)
> Core2 Duo E6600 CPU w/ the 4 meg cache
> 2 gigs of OCZ DDRam
> New Lian Li PC-61 case
> Mushkin modular 580 watt power supply (love this thing)
> nVidia 7950 PCI Xpress video card w/ 512 megs of memory
> 500 gig WD Sata data disk
> 74 gig WD Raptor boot disk
> 
> Windows Vista Performance rating for this setup is 5.4, on a scale of 1-5.
> The graphics and HD ratings are 5.9 and 5.7 respectively, but the lowest
> score is 5.4 for Calculations per Second, so that's the score that shows
> overall.
> 
> It's still not too shabby to be over 5 on a 1-5 rating scale.  :)
> 
> The modular cabling on the power supply is so cool.  Only have to plug in
> the cables you need, no excess cables clogging up the interior of the
case.
> :)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> >>I just installed VISTA Ultimate on my computer.
> >>
> >>
> >>My computer is a very simple i945G chipset based mobo with Pentium D 805
@
> 3.66Ghz and 2 GB of RAM.
> >>
> >>Vista runs fairly smooth, and surprisingly Aero Glass is enabled on the
integrated
> graphics card.
> >>
> >>I must say that VISTA really does feel like XP with a thick layer of
makeup on.
> However, I can feel the difference in the new TCP/IP stack.  All my
torrents are going
> much faster and also my network copies are going more smoother.
> >>
> >>Flip3D is super lame compared to Expose' but still better than nothing.
Instant
> search is a godsend!! Using spotlight on the mac really made me miss it on
the PC
> side.
> >>
> >>Overall I really do think that VISTA is too much of a hog for what it
is, I think OSX
> is "better" but that's more subjective.
> >>
> >>But as far as MS is concerned, they have done a decent job of a new
release.
> >>
> >>All my drivers and such work fine and I have faced no problems, so far,
but then
> again, I really haven't stressed the system too much as such.
> >>
> >>Regards,
> --
> 
> JRS<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Please remove  **X**  to reply...
> 
> ...Cleverly Disguised As A Responsible Adult...

Re: [H] VISTA Ultimate

[JRS]

Mine's doing OK with Vista as well,  

Used the excuse of Vista coming out to buy my 1st new PC in 2-3 years

Intel Badaxe 975 Xpress chipset mobo  (D975XBX2)
Core2 Duo E6600 CPU w/ the 4 meg cache
2 gigs of OCZ DDRam
New Lian Li PC-61 case
Mushkin modular 580 watt power supply (love this thing)
nVidia 7950 PCI Xpress video card w/ 512 megs of memory
500 gig WD Sata data disk
74 gig WD Raptor boot disk

Windows Vista Performance rating for this setup is 5.4, on a scale of 1-5. 
The graphics and HD ratings are 5.9 and 5.7 respectively, but the lowest
score is 5.4 for Calculations per Second, so that's the score that shows
overall.   

It's still not too shabby to be over 5 on a 1-5 rating scale.  :)

The modular cabling on the power supply is so cool.  Only have to plug in
the cables you need, no excess cables clogging up the interior of the case.
:)




>>I just installed VISTA Ultimate on my computer.
>>
>>
>>My computer is a very simple i945G chipset based mobo with Pentium D 805 @ 
>>3.66Ghz and 2 GB of RAM.
>>
>>Vista runs fairly smooth, and surprisingly Aero Glass is enabled on the 
>>integrated graphics card. 
>>
>>I must say that VISTA really does feel like XP with a thick layer of makeup 
>>on.  However, I can feel the difference in the new TCP/IP stack.  All my 
>>torrents are going much faster and also my network copies are going more 
>>smoother.
>>
>>Flip3D is super lame compared to Expose' but still better than nothing.  
>>Instant search is a godsend!! Using spotlight on the mac really made me miss 
>>it on the PC side.
>>
>>Overall I really do think that VISTA is too much of a hog for what it is, I 
>>think OSX is "better" but that's more subjective.
>>
>>But as far as MS is concerned, they have done a decent job of a new release.
>>
>>All my drivers and such work fine and I have faced no problems, so far, but 
>>then again, I really haven't stressed the system too much as such.
>>
>>Regards,
-- 

JRS<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Please remove  **X**  to reply...

...Cleverly Disguised As A Responsible Adult...

RE: [H] Added password to XP Pro user - now background gone...

[Bobby Heid]

Hey,
 
Sorry for the delay, I been at a training class.
 
I had already tried selecting a different image and then reselecting the
original image - no go.  I then copied the image into the same directory as
window's images and dtill it does not stick.
 
When I reboot, the image does come up.  It is just after coming back from
the screen saver (end entering the password) that the background is gone
(and stays gone).
 
Also, Joe, I do not have active desktop turned on.
 
Thanks,
Bobby

  _  

From: Rick Glazier(Gmail) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2007 12:15 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; The Hardware List
Subject: Re: [H] Added password to XP Pro user - now background gone...


Try changing the background to something else and then back...
Sometimes a background will get lost (as in wander off at the oddest times)
especially when the file is NOT originally in the Windows directory with the
standard ones. (So, put the file you want into the Windows directory.)
 
Rick Glazier

- Original Message - 
From: Bobby Heid   


Hey, 

To keep the kids from messing with a particular computer, I added a pw to an
existing user.  When the machine boots up, the background image is there.
Once the screen saver (standard XP logo one_ has kicked in, it requires the
pw to unlock it again.  Once this happens, the background image is no longer
there.

Any one know what's going on here? 

Re: [H] DNS question

[Al Anger]

"Brian Weeden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I will log in my Godaddy account and check it out.

You're welcome  :P

hehehe

Best,
al

Re: [H] DNS question

[Brian Weeden]

I will log in my Godaddy account and check it out.

On 2/26/07, Al Anger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


"Brian Weeden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I wanted to add a genealogy section to my website that was separate
> from the main site using this software:
>
> http://phpgedview.sourceforge.net/index.php

I don't see a prob. the URl would be
http://www.sub.domain.tld/some_file.php
I would guess


al




--
Brian

Re: [H] DNS question

[Al Anger]

"Brian Weeden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I wanted to add a genealogy section to my website that was separate
> from the main site using this software:
> 
> http://phpgedview.sourceforge.net/index.php

I don't see a prob. the URl would be
http://www.sub.domain.tld/some_file.php
I would guess


al

Re: [H] DNS question

[Brian Weeden]

Cool :)

I wanted to add a genealogy section to my website that was separate
from the main site using this software:

http://phpgedview.sourceforge.net/index.php

On 2/26/07, Al Anger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


"Brian Weeden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> If I own a domain name, say http://brianandcharity.net, how do you set
> it up for multiple sub-domains?
snip
> Or do you actually need to register those sub-domains with a registrar?

No, you don't. And your hosting company's software should provide the
directories automatically when you set up the subdomains. If you have
some form of control panel you login to at your provider, when you set
up the subs, it should create the directories for you.

al




--
Brian

Re: [H] DNS question

[Al Anger]

"Brian Weeden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> If I own a domain name, say http://brianandcharity.net, how do you set
> it up for multiple sub-domains? 
snip
> Or do you actually need to register those sub-domains with a registrar?

No, you don't. And your hosting company's software should provide the
directories automatically when you set up the subdomains. If you have
some form of control panel you login to at your provider, when you set
up the subs, it should create the directories for you.

al

[H] DNS question

[Brian Weeden]

If I own a domain name, say http://brianandcharity.net, how do you set
it up for multiple sub-domains?  If I wanted to have
www.brianandcharity.net point to one site, family.brianandcharity,net
point to another, travel.brianandcharity.net point to another, can I
just put different directories on the webserver?  In other words, does
it use the \www directory to serve the www subdomain and thus I can
just add \family and \travel, on the same level as \www?

Or do you actually need to register those sub-domains with a registrar?

--
Brian

[H] This is not a movie. It's OK to be afraid. Too late. But OK.

[G.Waleed Kavalec]

http://ibtimes.com/articles/20070226/surveillance-cameras.htm

Surveillance Cameras Get Smarter
By Stephen Manning

The next time you walk by a shop window, take a glance at your
reflection. How much do you swing your arms? Is the weight of your bag
causing you to hunch over? Do you still have a bit of that 1970s disco
strut left?

Look around - You might not be the only one watching. The
never-blinking surveillance cameras, rapidly becoming a part of daily
life in public and even private places, may be sizing you up as well.
And they may soon get a lot smarter.

Researchers and security companies are developing cameras that not
only watch the world but also interpret what they see. Soon, some
cameras may be able to find unattended bags at airports, guess your
height or analyze the way you walk to see if you are hiding something.

Most of the cameras widely used today are used as forensic tools to
identify crooks after-the-fact. (Think grainy video on local TV news
of convenience store robberies gone wrong.) But the latest breed,
known as "intelligent video," could transform cameras from passive
observers to eyes with brains, able to detect suspicious behavior and
potentially prevent crime before it occurs.

Surveillance cameras are common in many cities, monitoring tough
street corners to deter crime, watching over sensitive government
buildings and even catching speeders. Cameras are on public buses and
in train stations, building lobbies, schools and stores. Most feed
video to central control rooms, where they are monitored by security
staff.

The innovations could mean fewer people would be needed to watch what
they record, and make it easier to install more in public places and
private homes.

"Law enforcement people in this country are realizing they can use
video surveillance to be in a lot of places at one time," said Roy
Bordes, who runs an Orlando, Fla.-based security consulting company.
He also is a council vice president with ASIS International, a
Washington-based organization for security officials.

The advancements have already been put to work. For example, cameras
in Chicago and Washington can detect gunshots and alert police.
Baltimore installed cameras that can play a recorded message and snap
pictures of graffiti sprayers or illegal dumpers.

In the commercial market, the gaming industry uses camera systems that
can detect facial features, according to Bordes. Casinos use their
vast banks of security cameras to hunt cheating gamblers who have been
flagged before.

In London, one of the largest users of surveillance, cameras provided
key photos of the men who bombed the underground system in July 2005
and four more who failed in a second attempt just days later. But the
cameras were only able to help with the investigation, not prevent the
attacks.

Companies that make the latest cameras say the systems, if used
broadly, could make video surveillance much more powerful. Cameras
could monitor airports and ports, help secure homes and watch over
vast borders to catch people crossing illegally.

Intelligent surveillance uses computer algorithms to interpret what a
camera records. The system can be programmed to look for particular
things, like an unattended bag or people walking somewhere they don't
belong.

"If you think of the camera as your eye, we are using computer
programs as your brain," said Patty Gillespie, branch chief for image
processing at the Army Research Laboratory in Adelphi, Md. Today, the
military funds much of the smart-surveillance research.

At the University of Maryland, engineering professor Rama Chellappa
and a team of graduate students have worked on systems that can
identify a person's unique gait or analyze the way someone walks to
determine if they are a threat.

A camera trained to look for people on a watch list, for example,
could combine their unique walk with facial-recognition tools to make
an identification. A person carrying a heavy load under a jacket would
walk differently than someone unencumbered - which could help identify
a person hiding a weapon. The system could even estimate someone's
height.

With two cameras and a laptop computer set up in a conference room,
Chellappa and a team of graduate students recently demonstrated how
intelligent surveillance works.

A student walked into the middle of the room, dropped a laptop case,
then walked away. On the laptop screen, a green box popped up around
him as he moved into view, then a second focused on the case when it
was dropped. After a few seconds, the box around the case went red,
signaling an alert.

In another video, a car pulled into a parking lot and the driver got
out, a box springing up around him. It moved with the driver as he
went from car to car, looking in the windows instead of heading into
the building.

In both cases, the camera knew what was normal - the layout of the
room with the suspicious bag and the location of the office door and

Re: [H] Two-way radios for family use?

[Sam Franc]

I have the T5900 and it seems to work well for us.
Sam

Jerry Jones wrote:

I know this is a bit off topic, but it is hardware.

Can anyone recommend a good set of two-way radios for family vacation 
type of uses? We have an old pair of Motorola FRS Talkabouts that we 
have got many years use from and they are wearing out. A few months ago 
I bought a new pair of Motorola SX700 FRS/GMRS talkabouts. They work ok 
but my wife really dislikes them. She thinks they are too complicated to 
use compared to the older talkabouts. Plus the range does not seem to be 
all that much better even when using the GMRS channels and higher 
wattage than the older .5 watt talkabouts. (I do know that the range the 
mfg's list on the packaging is way more than the realistic range.)


We mainly use them when we travel with my brother-in-law's family as a 
means to stay in contact between vehicles. Also use them when we visit 
theme parks and similar places. This year we are planning a big summer 
vacation in our fifth wheel from CA to the East Coast and I expect we 
will have many opportunities to use radios to keep track of the kids.


So I am looking to purchase some new radios. I have read good things 
about the Motorola T7200 but it appears to be discontinued and not 
available for purchase anywhere, even ebay. Was looking at the Midland 
GXT600 and thinking about trying them. I tried a pair of Cobra's a year 
ago and ended up returning them. Any suggestions?


Thanks,
Jerry

RE: [H] Vista Supported software

[Bill]

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:hardware-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Dodge
> Sent: Monday, February 26, 2007 4:06 AM
> To: The Hardware List
> Subject: RE: [H] Vista Supported software
> 
> Try doing a repair of Office in Add/Remove.
> Worked for me.

Thanks.. I should have done that to begin with..

Off I go..

Bill

[H] Two-way radios for family use?

[Jerry Jones]

I know this is a bit off topic, but it is hardware.

Can anyone recommend a good set of two-way radios for family vacation type 
of uses? We have an old pair of Motorola FRS Talkabouts that we have got 
many years use from and they are wearing out. A few months ago I bought a 
new pair of Motorola SX700 FRS/GMRS talkabouts. They work ok but my wife 
really dislikes them. She thinks they are too complicated to use compared to 
the older talkabouts. Plus the range does not seem to be all that much 
better even when using the GMRS channels and higher wattage than the older 
.5 watt talkabouts. (I do know that the range the mfg's list on the 
packaging is way more than the realistic range.)


We mainly use them when we travel with my brother-in-law's family as a means 
to stay in contact between vehicles. Also use them when we visit theme parks 
and similar places. This year we are planning a big summer vacation in our 
fifth wheel from CA to the East Coast and I expect we will have many 
opportunities to use radios to keep track of the kids.


So I am looking to purchase some new radios. I have read good things about 
the Motorola T7200 but it appears to be discontinued and not available for 
purchase anywhere, even ebay. Was looking at the Midland GXT600 and thinking 
about trying them. I tried a pair of Cobra's a year ago and ended up 
returning them. Any suggestions?


Thanks,
Jerry 

Re[2]: [H] webroot AV ?

[Joe User]

Hello Mark,

Monday, February 26, 2007, 5:41:21 AM, you wrote:

> I am happy with it, but I'm using AVG also just in case

>> [Original Message]
>> From: FORC5 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: 
>> Date: 12/28/2006 8:46:59 AM
>> Subject: [H] webroot AV ?
>>
>> I have been pretty happy with ( more or less ) with Webroots Spy sweeper
> and they now offer AV.
>>
>> I was wondering if anyone had messed with it yet and have opinions ? I
> usually use that and Kaspsersky or Nod32 in customer boxes unless they opp
> for free. Have not looked at Avast but will check them out.


Wow, this message is old. Anyway, I happen to recall seeing this
message. I was also interested about Webroot's AV in their SpySweeper
program. Turns out they use Sophos AV definitions. So...

Product SKU: 65202
Product Name: Spy Sweeper with AntiVirus 2 Year Renewal
Qty Ordered: 1
Amount: $ 44.95

22.50 roughly per year for AV and malware protection and detection

I bought it - so far so good.


-- 
Regards,
 joeuser - Still looking for the 'any' key...

Re: [H] Connecting a DVD changer to HTPC?

[chuck]

- Original Message - 
From: "Brian Weeden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "The Hardware List" 


Sent: Monday, February 26, 2007 8:11 AM
Subject: Re: [H] Connecting a DVD changer to HTPC?



For the time being I am completely ignoring both Blu-ray and HD-DVD.
I hate being taken advantage of by Sony et al and will not put up for
it.



I forgot to give my current solution to the need for storage space.

I just ordered this from beachcamera.com

 Western Digital 500GB My Book Essential { High Speed USB 2.0 } 
External Hard Drive



 SKU: WDMBE500U

 $177.00 included shipping and no sales tax was added.  I did not mean 
that a bunch of us should run out and buy either Blue Ray or HD DVD anytime 
soon. I will wait a year or two for the shakedown, in confidence in one of 
the formats and great prices. When I speak of price drops I mean the type of 
drops you get by dropping a zero on the dollar side as in $1000.00 to 
$100.00. I realize that price drops of this magnitude do not occur in days 
or weeks nor do they occur in one or two increments.


 Rigid high prices or lack of the most effective endorsements could be 
the death blow to Sony or anyone. I hope the masses take the wait and see 
attitude. If and when either Blue Ray or HD DVD have a solid win and I can 
buy their reader for $100.00 and their writer for $300.00 I will gladly take 
the plunge. This is if the media is affordable, unlike Hewlett Packard 
printer toner and ink. I realize about 10% of the buying public are well 
heeled and will buy new products at most any price. Then there are the ones 
who are addicted to staying ahead of the Joneses and they will give the same 
priority to a new gadget that a gambling addict gives to their habit.


 Back to my latest purchase. I will have 500 GB of storage for only 
$177.00. Blue Ray offers only 50 GB and you have to use dual layer to get 
this, right? I read that HD DVD offers only 30 GB.


 Do you see where I am going with this? I want a Cable box or some go 
between that will allow me to hook up my 500 GB USB external hard drive and 
feed high definition movies to my Receiver (for audio) and to my high 
definition television. Better yet, how about a 500 GB high definition hard 
drive recorder that will record movies. It needs to have a Blue Ray or HD 
DVD writer built in so high definition movies on its huge hard drive can be 
copied to disks.


 The recorder can wait. Right now I need a way to play movies that I 
copy to my new 500 GB external hard drive. I feel that USB will feed fast 
enough to view movies. It certainly feeds fast enough to burn movies 
directly from it to my DVD Writer, but that is not in high definition.


 Chuck - the high tech redneck (or country boy) however you describe 
somebody raised in the rurals.

Re: [H] Connecting a DVD changer to HTPC?

[Brian Weeden]

For the time being I am completely ignoring both Blu-ray and HD-DVD.
I hate being taken advantage of by Sony et al and will not put up for
it.

Case in point - why the hell are the Blu-ray drives so expensive?
Because Sony wants people to push their PS3, that's why.  You can get
a naked HD-DVD drive for $250 to put in your PC but Blu-Ray is still
$600 - the same price as a whole PS3

Marketing wars also make me sick - like Sony coming out last week and
announcing that they had "won" the format war because of Dec/Jan
sales.

No, for the time being I am willing to stick with what I have and I
refuse to re-buy my entire DVD collection all over again.  I'm just
looking for better ways to store/enjoy it right now.

On 2/26/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


- Original Message -
From: "Brian Weeden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "hwg" 
Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2007 6:40 PM
Subject: [H] Connecting a DVD changer to HTPC?


> Anyone experimented with this?  A possible alternative to several TB
> of HD space would be to get something like this:
>
> http://www.pricegrabber.com/search_techspecs_full.php/masterid=9723273/
>

When we talk about high quantity data storage on optical disks, aren't DVD's
already obsolete as far as serious consideration goes? When my planning for
the future advances to hard drive space vs. optical disk data storage, I
think in terms of Blue Ray, not DVD's. This brings up two questions:

1. Who is your vote for, Blue Ray or HD-DVD?

2. Which one will win? I hope we do not end up with a hung jury on this one!
I hope Blue Ray does to HD-DVD what VHS did to Beta tapes and what IBM
clones did to Macs.

I hope Blue Ray will offer 3 inch diameter disks, like CD's and DVD's did.
Can you imagine how many MP3's will fit on a Blue Ray 3 inch diameter disk?
Those will work well in multi media players that play most all formats in
CD, DVD and Blue Ray, audio and movies.


Chuck





--
Brian

Re: [H] Kite Flying

[chuck]

- Original Message - 
From: "Zulfiqar, Naushad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

To: "The Hardware List" 
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2007 7:10 AM
Subject: [H] Kite Flying



Hey guys any of you here into stunt kite flying?



Every time I tried to fly one, the observers thought it was doing stunts. 


Chuck

[H] Kite Flying

[Zulfiqar, Naushad]

Hey guys any of you here into stunt kite flying?

 

Regards,

 

Re: [H] Connecting a DVD changer to HTPC?

[chuck]

- Original Message - 
From: "Brian Weeden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

To: "hwg" 
Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2007 6:40 PM
Subject: [H] Connecting a DVD changer to HTPC?



Anyone experimented with this?  A possible alternative to several TB
of HD space would be to get something like this:

http://www.pricegrabber.com/search_techspecs_full.php/masterid=9723273/



When we talk about high quantity data storage on optical disks, aren't DVD's 
already obsolete as far as serious consideration goes? When my planning for 
the future advances to hard drive space vs. optical disk data storage, I 
think in terms of Blue Ray, not DVD's. This brings up two questions:


1. Who is your vote for, Blue Ray or HD-DVD?

2. Which one will win? I hope we do not end up with a hung jury on this one! 
I hope Blue Ray does to HD-DVD what VHS did to Beta tapes and what IBM 
clones did to Macs.


I hope Blue Ray will offer 3 inch diameter disks, like CD's and DVD's did. 
Can you imagine how many MP3's will fit on a Blue Ray 3 inch diameter disk? 
Those will work well in multi media players that play most all formats in 
CD, DVD and Blue Ray, audio and movies.



Chuck 

RE: [H] Vista Supported software

[Mark Dodge]

Try doing a repair of Office in Add/Remove.
Worked for me.

Mark Dodge
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
EarthLink Revolves Around You.


> [Original Message]
> From: Bill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: The Hardware List 
> Date: 2/25/2007 9:36:00 AM
> Subject: RE: [H] Vista Supported software
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:hardware-
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Winterlight
> > Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2007 12:18 PM
> > To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
> > Subject: [H] Vista Supported software
> > 
> > Is there any kind of web site that lists Vista supported legacy
> > software. I figure sooner or later somebody is going to start
> > compiling one of these.
>
> And I'm one of the unlucky ones totally unable to run Outlook 2007 in
Vista
> Ultimate, It crashes within 10 seconds of opening. Even with all the evil
> add-ins disabled.. I have Google's this thing to death without an
answer.. And
> though I may be in the minority, I'm not alone with this issue.. Clean
install
> all the way around, by the way...
>
> Bill

RE: [H] webroot AV ?

[Mark Dodge]

I am happy with it, but I'm using AVG also just in case

Mark Dodge
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
EarthLink Revolves Around You.


> [Original Message]
> From: FORC5 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: 
> Date: 12/28/2006 8:46:59 AM
> Subject: [H] webroot AV ?
>
> I have been pretty happy with ( more or less ) with Webroots Spy sweeper
and they now offer AV.
>
> I was wondering if anyone had messed with it yet and have opinions ? I
usually use that and Kaspsersky or Nod32 in customer boxes unless they opp
for free. Have not looked at Avast but will check them out. 
> fp
>
>
> -- 
> Tallyho ! ]:8)
> Taglines below !
> --
> Perhaps a radiologist can find something of value in him?
>