RE: [H] Can't view https pages in IE6

2007-07-11 Thread Thane Sherrington

At 11:25 PM 10/07/2007, Eli Allen wrote:

Maybe this:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/303807/en-us


That fixed it.  Thanks!

T 



[H] Simple Windows benchmark software

2007-07-11 Thread Thane Sherrington
Does anyone know of a simple piece of Windows software (or a 
procedure I could write a script to do) that would test the speed 
of a computer.  I get a ton of computers in that are running slowly 
and I'd like to be able to take a before and after snapshot to see if 
they have sped up.


T



RE: [H] Can't view https pages in IE6

2007-07-11 Thread Hayes Elkins

Clear certificates?



From: Thane Sherrington [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: The Hardware List hardware@hardwaregroup.com
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: [H] Can't view https pages in IE6
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 21:31:39 -0300

For some reason, my IE6 has stopped wanting to view https pages - so I 
can't login to www.gmail.com, for instance (I get a page cannot be 
displayed.)  Firefox works fine.  I've tried clearing cookies, history, 
temp, with no change.  Reset security settings.  No change.   Any ideas?


T



_
http://imagine-windowslive.com/hotmail/?locale=en-usocid=TXT_TAGHM_migration_HM_mini_pcmag_0507



RE: [H] Simple Windows benchmark software

2007-07-11 Thread Hayes Elkins

When you say simple do you really mean quick?

I was gonna say PC Mark, free version, is pretty comprehensive, easy to use 
- but takes a while.




From: Thane Sherrington [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: The Hardware List hardware@hardwaregroup.com
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: [H] Simple Windows benchmark software
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 09:53:44 -0300

Does anyone know of a simple piece of Windows software (or a procedure I 
could write a script to do) that would test the speed of a computer.  I 
get a ton of computers in that are running slowly and I'd like to be able 
to take a before and after snapshot to see if they have sped up.


T



_
http://im.live.com/messenger/im/home/?source=hmtextlinkjuly07



RE: [H] Simple Windows benchmark software

2007-07-11 Thread Thane Sherrington

At 10:33 AM 11/07/2007, Hayes Elkins wrote:

When you say simple do you really mean quick?

I was gonna say PC Mark, free version, is pretty comprehensive, easy 
to use - but takes a while.


The faster the better, but I'd also like to get a reproducible 
result.  How long is PC Mark going to take?


T 



RE: [H] Simple Windows benchmark software

2007-07-11 Thread Greg Sevart
I don't know that any true benchmark software is going to provide
significantly valid results. A good deal of the slowness users report is
as a result of concurrent software (legitimate and spy/adware) running in
the background. Your standard benchmark application will run its battery of
tests at an elevated priority. Thus, your benchmark may drastically
understate the actual perceived performance improvement after you finish
your cleaning. You may in fact be doing yourself a great disservice...

Greg

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:hardware-
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thane Sherrington
 Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2007 7:54 AM
 To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
 Subject: [H] Simple Windows benchmark software
 
 Does anyone know of a simple piece of Windows software (or a
 procedure I could write a script to do) that would test the speed
 of a computer.  I get a ton of computers in that are running slowly
 and I'd like to be able to take a before and after snapshot to see if
 they have sped up.
 
 T





RE: [H] Simple Windows benchmark software

2007-07-11 Thread Thane Sherrington

At 12:17 PM 11/07/2007, Greg Sevart wrote:

I don't know that any true benchmark software is going to provide
significantly valid results. A good deal of the slowness users report is
as a result of concurrent software (legitimate and spy/adware) running in
the background. Your standard benchmark application will run its battery of
tests at an elevated priority. Thus, your benchmark may drastically
understate the actual perceived performance improvement after you finish
your cleaning. You may in fact be doing yourself a great disservice...


That's what I was thinking of writing something that would run 
through some sort of scripted series of steps in Windows - open IE, 
open WordPad, copy some files to a temp folder, delete the temp 
folder, etc, but I was thinking if there is something out there that 
does this, it'd save me the time.


I guess I could also time the boot time.

T 



Re: [H] Simple Windows benchmark software

2007-07-11 Thread j maccraw
Why not just log the % of idle time usage or something
like that?

Most of the snappiness of cleaned or freshly installed
windows is lack of extra 
processes  no fragmentation which quickly fades after
install software that 
adds support DLL's or processes.


Thane Sherrington wrote:
 At 12:17 PM 11/07/2007, Greg Sevart wrote:
 I don't know that any true benchmark software is
going to provide
 significantly valid results. A good deal of the
slowness users 
 report is
 as a result of concurrent software (legitimate and
spy/adware) running in
 the background. Your standard benchmark application
will run its 
 battery of
 tests at an elevated priority. Thus, your benchmark
may drastically
 understate the actual perceived performance
improvement after you finish
 your cleaning. You may in fact be doing yourself a
great disservice...
 
 That's what I was thinking of writing something that
would run through 
 some sort of scripted series of steps in Windows -
open IE, open 
 WordPad, copy some files to a temp folder, delete
the temp folder, etc, 
 but I was thinking if there is something out there
that does this, it'd 
 save me the time.
 
 I guess I could also time the boot time.
 
 T
 
 


   

Pinpoint customers who are looking for what you sell. 
http://searchmarketing.yahoo.com/


[H] MAC to PC

2007-07-11 Thread Winterlight
I am giving a modern P4 Compaq computer to a friend of mine who still 
uses a 10 year old Apple MAC. Her computer has no internet access, no 
network card. All her data is in Word files, and when her version of 
Word loads on her MAC it says Word for Windows. Can I copy the Word 
files to a regular Windows floppy from the MAC, and move them that 
way... or do PCs, and Apples use a different floppy FAT? If I can't 
move them that way .. then how? Thanks




Re: [H] MAC to PC

2007-07-11 Thread Harry McGregor
Winterlight wrote:
 I am giving a modern P4 Compaq computer to a friend of mine who still
 uses a 10 year old Apple MAC.
Need to know exactly which 10 year old mac, and what version of MacOS it
is running

Click on the apple, go to about this Macintosh.

Some 10 year old apples could have USB 1.x on them even.

Is it beige or fruity colored?

What model does it say on the front?

 Her computer has no internet access, no network card. All her data is
 in Word files, and when her version of Word loads on her MAC it says
 Word for Windows. Can I copy the Word files to a regular Windows
 floppy from the MAC, and move them that way... or do PCs, and Apples
 use a different floppy FAT? If I can't move them that way .. then how?
 Thanks

Most versions of MacOS (7.1 and higher) can read/write PC formated
1.44MB floppies.

Format the floppies on the PC though.

 Harry





Re: [H] MAC to PC

2007-07-11 Thread Scott Sipe
IIRC, just about any version of Mac OS should support reading/writing  
FAT floppies. if it's REALLY old you might have a problem with FAT32  
though?


If it's ~10 years old and has a floppy, I guess it doesn't have USB?  
Could always use a thumdrive if it does.


Scott

On Jul 11, 2007, at 8:36 PM, Winterlight wrote:

I am giving a modern P4 Compaq computer to a friend of mine who  
still uses a 10 year old Apple MAC. Her computer has no internet  
access, no network card. All her data is in Word files, and when  
her version of Word loads on her MAC it says Word for Windows. Can  
I copy the Word files to a regular Windows floppy from the MAC, and  
move them that way... or do PCs, and Apples use a different floppy  
FAT? If I can't move them that way .. then how? Thanks






Re: [H] MAC to PC

2007-07-11 Thread Winterlight



Need to know exactly which 10 year old mac, and what version of MacOS it
is running


I called and got the model number Power PC Macintosh Performa 
6400/200. The OS will have to wait until I can be there.




Some 10 year old apples could have USB 1.x on them even.


no I checked for that ... unfortunately not




Is it beige or fruity colored?


beige




What model does it say on the front?



Power PC
macintosh Performa
6400//200

exactly like that



Most versions of MacOS (7.1 and higher) can read/write PC formated
1.44MB floppies.


well that will make it easy. Will Word for windows on the PC read the 
word files she has on the Performa?


thanks for the help!




Re: [H] MAC to PC

2007-07-11 Thread Scott Sipe


On Jul 11, 2007, at 9:17 PM, Winterlight wrote:



Need to know exactly which 10 year old mac, and what version of  
MacOS it

is running


I called and got the model number Power PC Macintosh Performa  
6400/200. The OS will have to wait until I can be there.




I don't believe you really need to know this--as long as it was made  
after the early 1990s (which afaik, that model was--think I used  
one!), it should be able to read+write DOS/FAT formatted floppies.


Just don't use FAT32, to be safe.

Scott


Re: [H] MAC to PC

2007-07-11 Thread Harry McGregor
Winterlight wrote:

 Need to know exactly which 10 year old mac, and what version of MacOS it
 is running

 I called and got the model number Power PC Macintosh Performa
 6400/200. The OS will have to wait until I can be there.
That model would have to be at least OS 7.5, as that was the first
version to support Power PC processors.


 Some 10 year old apples could have USB 1.x on them even.

 no I checked for that ... unfortunately not



 Is it beige or fruity colored?

 beige



 What model does it say on the front?


 Power PC
 macintosh Performa
 6400//200

 exactly like that


* introduced 1996.10.23, discontinued 1997.05.01
* requires System 7.5.3 through 9.1
* CPU: 180 MHz or 200 MHz PPC 603e
* bus: 40 MHz
* performance: XXX (relative to SE)
* ROM: 4 MB
* RAM: 16 MB, expandable to 136 MB using two DIMMs
* VRAM: 1 MB, supports thousands of colors up to 800 x 600, 256
  colors up to 1024x764
* L2 cache: optional on 180 MHz, 256 KB on 200 MHz
* hard drive: IDE, 1.6 GB on 180 MHz, 2.4 GB on 200 MHz
* CD-ROM: 8x
* mic: standard 3.5mm minijack, compatible with line-level input
  including Apple's PlainTalk microphone
* ADB port for keyboard and mouse
* DIN-8 GeoPorts on back of computer
* DB-25 SCSI connector on back of computer
* Comm II slot, occupied by 28.8 kbps modem (may be a GeoPort modem
  or a real modem)
* video input slot (accepts TV/FM card)
* video out port
* two PCI slots: top slot may accept a 12 card, but bottom slot
  will only handle a 7 card


http://www.zone6400.com/index.html might be more help too :)

You can even add a USB card if you wish

http://www.zone6400.com/files/firewire_USB.html

 Most versions of MacOS (7.1 and higher) can read/write PC formated
 1.44MB floppies.

 well that will make it easy. Will Word for windows on the PC read the
 word files she has on the Performa?

Word should be able to open them or convert them without much of an issue.


   Harry

 thanks for the help!