Re: [H] RAM question

[Hayes Elkins]

PC3200 - probably. 3500? There is no such thing. That's gimmicky ram for the OC 
genre, and a wild card if it will move forward.

> Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 14:24:29 -0400
> To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [H] RAM question
>
> Thank you for your shares about SATA.
>
> Question now about RAM.
> I have current DDR RAM rated PC3200 and PC3500.
> Can this 3200/3500 DDR RAM move forward?
>
> I will give that all my PC133, PC100, and PC66 DIMMS get sold, or, held as
> spares for older machines 'not yet ready' for upgrade. The plan
> anyway :)
> Thank you,
> Duncan
>

_
Talk to your Yahoo! Friends via Windows Live Messenger.  Find out how.
http://www.windowslive.com/explore/messenger?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_messenger_yahoo_082008

Re: [H] RAM question

[Beave]

Hello Heyes,

Although, you maybe correct but I actually use PC3500 DDR2 memory in my current 
system.  The memory is actually clocked at 1066MHz on my 780i Motherboard. Let 
me tell you it is sweet running at that speed compared to 800MHz memory.

Here's the memory I use 
http://www.corsair.com/products/go.aspx?pn=QUAD2X4096-8500C5DF

Regards,

--- Original Message ---
PC3200 - probably. 3500? There is no such thing. That's gimmicky ram for the OC 
genre, and a wild card if it will move forward.

> Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 14:24:29 -0400
> To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [H] RAM question
>
> Thank you for your shares about SATA.
>
> Question now about RAM.
> I have current DDR RAM rated PC3200 and PC3500.
> Can this 3200/3500 DDR RAM move forward?
>
> I will give that all my PC133, PC100, and PC66 DIMMS get sold, or, 
> held as spares for older machines 'not yet ready' for upgrade. The 
> plan anyway :) Thank you, Duncan
>

_
Talk to your Yahoo! Friends via Windows Live Messenger.  Find out how.
http://www.windowslive.com/explore/messenger?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_messenger_yahoo_082008=

--
Tim "The Beave" Lider
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
AIM: dowbeave

[H] Router, Netgear FVS318

[FORC5]

I have finally moved forward to wify router on my LAN.

Have two Netgear 8 port fvs318 router for stream. One rev 1 and one rev 3

B4 I put them on ebay was offering to anyone on the list who might have a need.

$25 for BOTH plus shipping. ( should fit in a flat rate box )

both have been reset to factory default. Have current firmware. Only have 
manual for one. Both have pretty much been flawless except for a occasional 
reboot.

thanks
fp

-- 
Tallyho ! ]:8)
Taglines below !
--
Always do right: Gratify some and astonish the rest.

[H] Are current Intel procs really heaters?

[DHSinclair]

Planning to go Intel dual-core ATM.
Tired of the sandbox races; believe Intel is the
current choice. Believe most of the List is now Intel.
Could be wrong... :)

Anywho, what family of Intel processors should I shop
for "relatively" cool operation?

Know about Zalman coolers, but I tend to focus on
ThermalRight coolers (that replaced my old Alpha coolers).
Thank you for suggestions.
Best,
Duncan

Re: [H] Are current Intel procs really heaters?

[Bobby Heid]

I think that the next-generation "Nehalem" (I think that is how it is
spelled) that is coming out soon if not already out will be your best bet
for processing power AND temperatures.

Bobby

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of DHSinclair
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 9:36 PM
To: Hardware Group
Subject: [H] Are current Intel procs really heaters?

Planning to go Intel dual-core ATM.
Tired of the sandbox races; believe Intel is the
current choice. Believe most of the List is now Intel.
Could be wrong... :)

Anywho, what family of Intel processors should I shop
for "relatively" cool operation?

Know about Zalman coolers, but I tend to focus on
ThermalRight coolers (that replaced my old Alpha coolers).
Thank you for suggestions.
Best,
Duncan

Re: [H] Are current Intel procs really heaters?

[Greg Sevart]

Current Wolfdales (C2D E8xxx series) run very cool.

This related to your memory question? Your PC-3200 DDR400 memory won't work
in boards supporting C2D.

Greg

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:hardware-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bobby Heid
> Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 8:52 PM
> To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
> Subject: Re: [H] Are current Intel procs really heaters?
> 
> I think that the next-generation "Nehalem" (I think that is how it is
> spelled) that is coming out soon if not already out will be your best
> bet
> for processing power AND temperatures.
> 
> Bobby
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of DHSinclair
> Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 9:36 PM
> To: Hardware Group
> Subject: [H] Are current Intel procs really heaters?
> 
> Planning to go Intel dual-core ATM.
> Tired of the sandbox races; believe Intel is the
> current choice. Believe most of the List is now Intel.
> Could be wrong... :)
> 
> Anywho, what family of Intel processors should I shop
> for "relatively" cool operation?
> 
> Know about Zalman coolers, but I tend to focus on
> ThermalRight coolers (that replaced my old Alpha coolers).
> Thank you for suggestions.
> Best,
> Duncan
> 
> 

Re: [H] Are current Intel procs really heaters?

[Winterlight]

The first Nehalem, which has been now been officially named CORE, 
won't be out until the end of the year and the first available 
processors will be in the 1000 dollar range. It will be this time 
next year before prices come down to affordable levels.


from todays Maximum PC news letter >>>
--
And speaking of Nehalem, Intel 
officially 
announced last week that the retail name of the not-so-secret 
architecture will be "Core". We're not so hot on the relatively bland 
moniker, but it doesn't make us any less excited for the reportedly 
ultra-speedy new processors. In fact, we couldn't wait to get our 
hands on Nehalem hardware, and got ahold of a new X58 motherboard and 
Core i7 CPU to 
build 
the first Nehalem rig.

--


At 06:52 PM 8/19/2008, you wrote:

I think that the next-generation "Nehalem" (I think that is how it is
spelled) that is coming out soon if not already out will be your best bet
for processing power AND temperatures.

Bobby

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of DHSinclair
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 9:36 PM
To: Hardware Group
Subject: [H] Are current Intel procs really heaters?

Planning to go Intel dual-core ATM.
Tired of the sandbox races; believe Intel is the
current choice. Believe most of the List is now Intel.
Could be wrong... :)

Anywho, what family of Intel processors should I shop
for "relatively" cool operation?

Know about Zalman coolers, but I tend to focus on
ThermalRight coolers (that replaced my old Alpha coolers).
Thank you for suggestions.
Best,
Duncan

Re: [H] Are current Intel procs really heaters?

[Bobby Heid]

Well that sucks!  LOL.

Bobby

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Winterlight
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 10:03 PM
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: Re: [H] Are current Intel procs really heaters?

The first Nehalem, which has been now been officially named CORE, 
won't be out until the end of the year and the first available 
processors will be in the 1000 dollar range. It will be this time 
next year before prices come down to affordable levels.

from todays Maximum PC news letter >>>

--
And speaking of Nehalem, Intel 
off
icially 
announced last week that the retail name of the not-so-secret 
architecture will be "Core". We're not so hot on the relatively bland 
moniker, but it doesn't make us any less excited for the reportedly 
ultra-speedy new processors. In fact, we couldn't wait to get our 
hands on Nehalem hardware, and got ahold of a new X58 motherboard and 
Core i7 CPU to 
bui
ld 
the first Nehalem rig.

--


At 06:52 PM 8/19/2008, you wrote:
>I think that the next-generation "Nehalem" (I think that is how it is
>spelled) that is coming out soon if not already out will be your best bet
>for processing power AND temperatures.
>
>Bobby
>
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of DHSinclair
>Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 9:36 PM
>To: Hardware Group
>Subject: [H] Are current Intel procs really heaters?
>
>Planning to go Intel dual-core ATM.
>Tired of the sandbox races; believe Intel is the
>current choice. Believe most of the List is now Intel.
>Could be wrong... :)
>
>Anywho, what family of Intel processors should I shop
>for "relatively" cool operation?
>
>Know about Zalman coolers, but I tend to focus on
>ThermalRight coolers (that replaced my old Alpha coolers).
>Thank you for suggestions.
>Best,
>Duncan

Re: [H] Are current Intel procs really heaters?

[DHSinclair]

Greg,
So now I am at new m/b(s), proc(s), video card(s), and RAM?
Bummer..more planning... :)
[sure hope the new m/b(s) come with on board giga-bit LAN!]
Ain't technology fun?
Thanks,
Duncan

At 20:58 08/19/2008 -0500, you wrote:

Current Wolfdales (C2D E8xxx series) run very cool.

This related to your memory question? Your PC-3200 DDR400 memory won't work
in boards supporting C2D.

Greg

snip

Re: [H] Are current Intel procs really heaters?

[Greg Sevart]

That's the highest binned part. Initial launch this year is planned with
three clock speeds (all Bloomfield-based, 4 core, 8 threads, 8MB L3,
tri-channel DDR3 memory controller)
2.66Ghz at $284
2.93GHz at $562
3.2GHz at $999 (likely an EE part)

The actual name isn't just Core, it's Core i7.


> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:hardware-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Winterlight
> Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 9:03 PM
> To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
> Subject: Re: [H] Are current Intel procs really heaters?
> 
> The first Nehalem, which has been now been officially named CORE,
> won't be out until the end of the year and the first available
> processors will be in the 1000 dollar range. It will be this time
> next year before prices come down to affordable levels.
> 
> from todays Maximum PC news letter >>>
> ---
> ---
> And speaking of Nehalem, Intel
>  4&m=fef61175726206&l=fe9315757063027975&s=fe31157274640074751178&jb=ffc
> f14&t=>officially
> announced last week that the retail name of the not-so-secret
> architecture will be "Core". We're not so hot on the relatively bland
> moniker, but it doesn't make us any less excited for the reportedly
> ultra-speedy new processors. In fact, we couldn't wait to get our
> hands on Nehalem hardware, and got ahold of a new X58 motherboard and
> Core i7 CPU to
>  4&m=fef61175726206&l=fe9315757063027975&s=fe31157274640074751178&jb=ffc
> f14&t=>build
> the first Nehalem rig.
> ---
> ---
> 
> 
> At 06:52 PM 8/19/2008, you wrote:
> >I think that the next-generation "Nehalem" (I think that is how it is
> >spelled) that is coming out soon if not already out will be your best
> bet
> >for processing power AND temperatures.
> >
> >Bobby
> >
> >-Original Message-
> >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of DHSinclair
> >Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 9:36 PM
> >To: Hardware Group
> >Subject: [H] Are current Intel procs really heaters?
> >
> >Planning to go Intel dual-core ATM.
> >Tired of the sandbox races; believe Intel is the
> >current choice. Believe most of the List is now Intel.
> >Could be wrong... :)
> >
> >Anywho, what family of Intel processors should I shop
> >for "relatively" cool operation?
> >
> >Know about Zalman coolers, but I tend to focus on
> >ThermalRight coolers (that replaced my old Alpha coolers).
> >Thank you for suggestions.
> >Best,
> >Duncan