[H] What is BoB for Intel D940 cpu?
Hi Guys, I plan to upgrade mine for Intel D940 cpu. I look at ABIT AB9 Pro (non SLI, not avaliable yet locally) or ABIT AW8D (only 1 PCI, need at least 2 PCI). I will use it for Photoshop CS2, video editing, light gaming. Advices &suggestions are welcome. TIA. -- Garind P =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Visit http://www.maludong.com "oc ur mobo not urself or anybody else"
Re: [H] Microsoft Says Recovery from Malware Becoming Impossible
As Microsoft's guy, I already told you "We only deliver what you need, but it's up to you because you're the one to choose to do, so it's your own risk" You are familiar with ir, are you guys :lol At 05:04 PM 4/5/2006, warpmedia wrote: LOL, bash away boys, the next popular OS will have the same issues. Jin-Wei Tioh wrote: At 08:12 PM 4/4/2006, you wrote: And don't forget to include the Geniuses from Redmond that gave us the fertile ground of their security-hole ridden OS that made all this possible in the first place... Bill Heh... that too :P I guess the blame breaks down to, what? 80% - 20%? 80% - MS's fault 20% - Popularity of OS -- JW -- Garind P =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Visit http://www.maludong.com "oc ur mobo not urself or anybody else"
RE: [H] Hey Chris >> SureThing
At 05:35 AM 11/21/2005, Chris Reeves wrote: That's why you get an Epson R200/R220/R300 that prints directly on the CDs :) Well, I'm not in that league yet ;-). Usualy I print the label on HP ColorLJ, it's not too bad ... just not perfect ;-) -- Garind P =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= "oc ur mobo not urself or anybody else"
Re: [H] [N] Samsung to Release 19" Laptop
I wonder who has that big lap to put it on. At 10:34 AM 10/5/2005, Jin-Wei Tioh wrote: http://www.gizmag.com/go/4500/ Insane. Aren't 15.4" WS lappys already a chore to carry around? -- JW -- Garind P =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= "oc ur mobo not urself or anybody else"
[H] Earth google
Anybody try http://earth.google.com/ -- Garind P =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= "oc ur mobo not urself or anybody else"
RE: [H] FAT32 Question
At 07:39 AM 8/16/2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A simple answer would be use NTFS - a far superior file system, and as it is for camera backup purposes, should be fine. Well, I tried once, but it will reporting that the drive is not formated when it stat. (Sorry to to tell you that the enclosure is a HD enclosure with build memorycard reader + Lithium Battery, it has 2cm x 4 cm LCD display) But a couple of observations: The 32Gb limit on formatting FAT32 partitions in 2k and XP is not a bug. It's there by design to discourage the use of FAT32 when NTFS is available. Running FDISK and MBR will not touch your RAID setup, as you are referring to an external drive, are you not? Well, finally I solve it using demo version Partition Magic. -- Garind P =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= "oc ur mobo not urself or anybody else"
Re: [H] FAT32 Question
At 11:47 AM 8/15/2005, W. D. wrote: Not FAT32--Max is 2 Terabytes: http://tinyurl.com/bmzvx More likely, it's a limitation of the firmware of the hard drive. Did you "fdisk" the drive? Fdisk allows for partitioning of the drive, as well as viewing what partitions already exist. If you are starting fresh, you might want to: fdisk /MBR That will trash the current master boot record. Go back into fdisk and clean out any partitions, and start anew. After partitioning, then format the disk however you want. http://www.google.com/search?q=master+boot+record+usb+hard+drive Thanks for the info and links. Well I don't want to run "fdisk /MBR" that will destroy my SATA RAID0 setup. It's a portable 2.5" 40Gb USB drive, and I use it as my camera memory backup. -- Garind P =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= "oc ur mobo not urself or anybody else"
Re: [H] FAT32 Question
At 11:22 AM 8/15/2005, Wayne Johnson wrote: I thought the 32g limit was a hardware imposed limit of the IDE controller chip via the machine's bios & being that this drive is USB 2.0 it should have no bearing as far as the drive is concerned which leaves me to ask what SPs do you have installed on the 2k machine? If you have SP4 then it should NOT be a problem. Do you have another machine to hook the portable drive to? What was the drive formatted at before? Is this some one else's drive? The only reason I ask is because of the way that you presented the problem & feel free to ignore it. I have both W2KSP4 & WXPSP2 boxes, and both won't do bigger than 32GB. -- Garind P =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= "oc ur mobo not urself or anybody else"
Re: [H] FAT32 Question
At 06:49 PM 8/15/2005, Greg Sevart wrote: Not FAT32--Max is 2 Terabytes: http://tinyurl.com/bmzvx Negative. While FAT32 may have a limit >32GB, Win2000 and WinXP can NOT format a FAT32 partition over 32GB (even though they can mount and use a parition that has already been formatted >32GB) http://www.allensmith.net/Storage/HDDlimit/FAT32.htm The limitation is imposed to get people to run a filesystem that doesn't suck. Well, this what I suppect that the bug in "WINDOWS 2K & XP" that make me unable to format bigger than 32Gb partition, unless using other tools. Is it ok with WIndows98SE? (I don't have Win98 box anymore). -- Garind P =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= "oc ur mobo not urself or anybody else"
[H] FAT32 Question
I have strange problem with my portable HD. It's inside the USB 2.0 enclosure, and it's a 40Gb 2.5"HD. Actually the problem is it has a corrupted folder that couldn't be deleted (error message). I tried to format the drive thru Win2K desktop PC with FAT32 format mode but I got error message couldn't able to continue formatting. I suspect that this error is due to size limitation on FAT32, but I don't know the exact size, my guess is 32Gb max maybe less. -- Garind P =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= "oc ur mobo not urself or anybody else"
Re: [H] Linux/more questions
I think you better just download and install it, then you will know what's in it. At 04:26 AM 8/6/2005, FORC5 wrote: What works with Linux ? does it come ready for Internet and email or is that extra stuff sorry if this seems stupid. >:-} -- Garind P =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= "oc ur mobo not urself or anybody else"
RE: [H] Firefox 1.06 out
At 08:33 PM 7/20/2005, Chris Reeves wrote: ? Really? I downloaded and installed it last night? :) So they're fast to fix the problems, hope not too fast to know the next flaw ;-) -- Garind P =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= "oc ur mobo not urself or anybody else"
Re: [H] Firefox 1.06 out
As I read somewhere from the net, it's not out yet, they look for some add-on/plug-in malfucnction problems which worked on 1.04 but not in 1.05. Hope they can fix the security and the problem plugin problem in 1.06. At 12:17 PM 7/20/2005, Chris Reeves wrote: You know where. CW -- Garind P =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= "oc ur mobo not urself or anybody else"
Re: [H] The real reason Apple went to Intel
At 11:26 PM 7/11/2005, Brian Weeden wrote: http://arstechnica.com/columns/mac/mac-20050710.ars?38847 Very intersting. I tend to believe his anaylsis, especially with the just unveiled new PowerPC chips that are what Apple has been waiting for. How many % Bill Gates or Paul Allen share in Apple? Then, - related to Windows vs Open system (supported by IBM, HP, other, especially IBM). In Europe, Open system start winning legal support. - Intel vs AMD (I smell something strange with Dell, which refuses to use AMD, and today their Intel PC prices way cheaper than HP or IBM, even local brand) -- Garind P =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= "oc ur mobo not urself or anybody else"
RE: [H] hello, test
Seem to me Jim is never change isn't he, start to worry if this list suddently quiet. You know what Jim, we are getting older ;-) At 06:04 PM 6/28/2005, Chris Reeves wrote: But the list is quite what? We're still here ;) -Original Message- [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim Edwards Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2005 5:46 AM Subject: [H] hello, test List is quite, thought I would send a test. -- Garind P =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= "oc ur mobo not urself or anybody else"
Re: [H] Interesting P4 benchmarks
At 02:47 PM 5/22/2005, Winterlight wrote: But the video encoding, which is a real world use test for me, was 18.69 percent faster. This is pretty darn good, and makes a real world difference. It also makes the upgrade worth doing, for encoding purposes. I will notice the difference with that much improvement. I think it's because of SSE3 in Prescott. -- Garind P =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= "oc ur mobo not urself or anybody else"
Re: [H] Laplink PCMover for system software transfer
I believe all new PC today is NIC build in. Why don't you use a cross LAN cable then move the files using windows explorer. Of course you need to share the folder. At 09:06 PM 5/17/2005, Anthony Q. Martin wrote: I've got a new machine at work. Now I must complete the horrible task of moving all of my stuff from my old machine to the new one (it always has WinXP SR2 installed). I want to use Laplink PCmover to accomplish this. However, I'm concerned. Has anyone used this software to move the files and installed software? I plan to use a firewire connection between the two machines. Will PCmover recognize that network connection? Thanks. -- Garind P =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= "oc ur mobo not urself or anybody else"
