Re[2]: [H] Samsung 226BW 22 WideScreen LCD - $291

2007-04-17 Thread Joe User
Hello Bryan,

Monday, April 16, 2007, 8:05:47 PM, you wrote:


 DELL
 
 DELL
 E228WFP 22-inch Widescreen Flat Panel Monitor
 Usually Ships 1-2 Days
 Manufacturer Part# KU311
 Dell Part# 320-5205


 $279, no rebate needed.


I heard/read the latest Dell panels are slacking a lot. Color ain't so
hot, etc...


-- 
Regards,
 joeuser - Still looking for the 'any' key...



RE: Re[2]: [H] Samsung 226BW 22 WideScreen LCD - $291

2007-04-17 Thread Greg Sevart
In gaming, the overriding concern is typically response time. To this end, a
TN+ panel is usually your best bet.

If you were doing graphics work, I wouldn't consider anything but an S-IPS
based display. S-PVA and P-MVA panels are good intermediate panels.

My brother, an avid gamer, has a 4:3 20 Viewsonic VP2030b display. It uses
a P-MVA panel and does a very nice job all-around. I'd be inclined to go for
the Dell 2407WFP though. It uses a S-PVA panel and has a quite respectable
response time, but your 6800 isn't going to run those games at native
resolution (1920x1200) very well.

Greg

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe User
Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2007 9:56 AM
To: The Hardware List
Subject: Re[2]: [H] Samsung 226BW 22 WideScreen LCD - $291

Hello Greg,

Monday, April 16, 2007, 9:08:08 PM, you wrote:

 They're both TN+ film panels. The S panel is simply the TN panel made by
 Samsung. It's better than the AUO, but still is a TN+.


Ok let me ask this, what would be a good/great 21+ inch wide screen
LCD that would be used for gaming. I have a nVidia 6800 with DVI and analog
ports. Games played: WoW, Doom 3, Quake 4


-- 
Regards,
 joeuser - Still looking for the 'any' key...





Re[2]: [H] Samsung 226BW 22 WideScreen LCD - $291

2007-04-17 Thread Joe User
Hello Greg,

Monday, April 16, 2007, 9:08:08 PM, you wrote:

 They're both TN+ film panels. The S panel is simply the TN panel made by
 Samsung. It's better than the AUO, but still is a TN+.


Ok let me ask this, what would be a good/great 21+ inch wide screen
LCD that would be used for gaming. I have a nVidia 6800 with DVI and analog
ports. Games played: WoW, Doom 3, Quake 4


-- 
Regards,
 joeuser - Still looking for the 'any' key...



Re: Re[2]: [H] Samsung 226BW 22 WideScreen LCD - $291

2007-04-17 Thread JRS
Do you have a good site that shows the differences between the differing panel 
technologies??
I would like to learn more on this stuff..

 
-- 
JRS [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please remove  **X**  to reply...

Facts do not cease to exist just
because they are ignored.

- Original Message 
From: Greg Sevart [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Joe User [EMAIL PROTECTED]; The Hardware List hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2007 9:44:13 AM
Subject: RE: Re[2]: [H] Samsung 226BW 22 WideScreen LCD  -   $291

In gaming, the overriding concern is typically response time. To this end, a
TN+ panel is usually your best bet.

If you were doing graphics work, I wouldn't consider anything but an S-IPS
based display. S-PVA and P-MVA panels are good intermediate panels.

My brother, an avid gamer, has a 4:3 20 Viewsonic VP2030b display. It uses
a P-MVA panel and does a very nice job all-around. I'd be inclined to go for
the Dell 2407WFP though. It uses a S-PVA panel and has a quite respectable
response time, but your 6800 isn't going to run those games at native
resolution (1920x1200) very well.

Greg

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe User
Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2007 9:56 AM
To: The Hardware List
Subject: Re[2]: [H] Samsung 226BW 22 WideScreen LCD - $291

Hello Greg,

Monday, April 16, 2007, 9:08:08 PM, you wrote:

 They're both TN+ film panels. The S panel is simply the TN panel made by
 Samsung. It's better than the AUO, but still is a TN+.


Ok let me ask this, what would be a good/great 21+ inch wide screen
LCD that would be used for gaming. I have a nVidia 6800 with DVI and analog
ports. Games played: WoW, Doom 3, Quake 4


-- 
Regards,
 joeuser - Still looking for the 'any' key...








RE: Re[2]: [H] Samsung 226BW 22 WideScreen LCD - $291

2007-04-17 Thread Greg Sevart
There are several good resources for learning about different panel
technologies, with varying levels of detail. One site (actually, a forum
post) that provides a great high-level overview is here:
http://www.hardforum.com/showthread.php?t=1039222

Another excellent resource for learning about the panel technologies,
learning how to read specifications, as well as lookup the panel is used in
a given display, is here: 
http://www.tftcentral.co.uk/


Greg

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of JRS
Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2007 12:50 PM
To: The Hardware List
Subject: Re: Re[2]: [H] Samsung 226BW 22 WideScreen LCD - $291

Do you have a good site that shows the differences between the differing
panel technologies??
I would like to learn more on this stuff..

 
-- 
JRS [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please remove  **X**  to reply...

Facts do not cease to exist just
because they are ignored.

- Original Message 
From: Greg Sevart [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Joe User [EMAIL PROTECTED]; The Hardware List
hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2007 9:44:13 AM
Subject: RE: Re[2]: [H] Samsung 226BW 22 WideScreen LCD  -   $291

In gaming, the overriding concern is typically response time. To this end, a
TN+ panel is usually your best bet.

If you were doing graphics work, I wouldn't consider anything but an S-IPS
based display. S-PVA and P-MVA panels are good intermediate panels.

My brother, an avid gamer, has a 4:3 20 Viewsonic VP2030b display. It uses
a P-MVA panel and does a very nice job all-around. I'd be inclined to go for
the Dell 2407WFP though. It uses a S-PVA panel and has a quite respectable
response time, but your 6800 isn't going to run those games at native
resolution (1920x1200) very well.

Greg

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe User
Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2007 9:56 AM
To: The Hardware List
Subject: Re[2]: [H] Samsung 226BW 22 WideScreen LCD - $291

Hello Greg,

Monday, April 16, 2007, 9:08:08 PM, you wrote:

 They're both TN+ film panels. The S panel is simply the TN panel made by
 Samsung. It's better than the AUO, but still is a TN+.


Ok let me ask this, what would be a good/great 21+ inch wide screen
LCD that would be used for gaming. I have a nVidia 6800 with DVI and analog
ports. Games played: WoW, Doom 3, Quake 4


-- 
Regards,
 joeuser - Still looking for the 'any' key...










Re[4]: [H] Samsung 226BW 22 WideScreen LCD - $291

2007-04-17 Thread Joe User
Hello Greg,

Tuesday, April 17, 2007, 11:44:13 AM, you wrote:

 In gaming, the overriding concern is typically response time. To this end, a
 TN+ panel is usually your best bet.

 If you were doing graphics work, I wouldn't consider anything but an S-IPS
 based display. S-PVA and P-MVA panels are good intermediate panels.

 My brother, an avid gamer, has a 4:3 20 Viewsonic VP2030b display. It uses
 a P-MVA panel and does a very nice job all-around. I'd be inclined to go for
 the Dell 2407WFP though. It uses a S-PVA panel and has a quite respectable
 response time, but your 6800 isn't going to run those games at native
 resolution (1920x1200) very well.


Yeah my 6800 is getting aged. I was looking at the Radeon X1950 Pro
AGP as an upgrade (a final one since this is an AGP system) However, I
was concerned about upgrading my PSU and also if the performance gain
would be that substantial. OK so Dell panels aren't so bad then? You
suggest 2407WFP Bryan suggested the 226BW. I don't mind (in fact I
expect to) paying for a quality panel.


-- 
Regards,
 joeuser - Still looking for the 'any' key...



RE: Re[4]: [H] Samsung 226BW 22 WideScreen LCD - $291

2007-04-17 Thread Greg Sevart
Not all Dell panels are the same. The 2407WFP is more of their premium line,
whereas the E228WFP is a cheaper model. I'd stay away from the cheaper
panels, but the Ultrasharp models are typically quite decent. Of course,
I'd never buy a cheap display anyway. :)

Greg

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe User
Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2007 2:24 PM
To: 'The Hardware List'
Subject: Re[4]: [H] Samsung 226BW 22 WideScreen LCD - $291

Hello Greg,

Tuesday, April 17, 2007, 11:44:13 AM, you wrote:

 In gaming, the overriding concern is typically response time. To this end,
a
 TN+ panel is usually your best bet.

 If you were doing graphics work, I wouldn't consider anything but an S-IPS
 based display. S-PVA and P-MVA panels are good intermediate panels.

 My brother, an avid gamer, has a 4:3 20 Viewsonic VP2030b display. It
uses
 a P-MVA panel and does a very nice job all-around. I'd be inclined to go
for
 the Dell 2407WFP though. It uses a S-PVA panel and has a quite respectable
 response time, but your 6800 isn't going to run those games at native
 resolution (1920x1200) very well.


Yeah my 6800 is getting aged. I was looking at the Radeon X1950 Pro
AGP as an upgrade (a final one since this is an AGP system) However, I
was concerned about upgrading my PSU and also if the performance gain
would be that substantial. OK so Dell panels aren't so bad then? You
suggest 2407WFP Bryan suggested the 226BW. I don't mind (in fact I
expect to) paying for a quality panel.


-- 
Regards,
 joeuser - Still looking for the 'any' key...





RE: Re[4]: [H] Samsung 226BW 22 WideScreen LCD - $291

2007-04-17 Thread Hayes Elkins
Zzzhuh? What's that? Discussions about superior displays? Wake 
me up when something tops my Sony 21 GDM-520 CRT (now 6 years old). I'll 
set my snooze alarm for next decade...zzz



;)



From: Greg Sevart [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: The Hardware List hardware@hardwaregroup.com
To: 'The Hardware List' hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: RE: Re[4]: [H] Samsung 226BW 22 WideScreen LCD  -   $291
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 16:01:55 -0500

Not all Dell panels are the same. The 2407WFP is more of their premium 
line,

whereas the E228WFP is a cheaper model. I'd stay away from the cheaper
panels, but the Ultrasharp models are typically quite decent. Of course,
I'd never buy a cheap display anyway. :)

Greg

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe User
Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2007 2:24 PM
To: 'The Hardware List'
Subject: Re[4]: [H] Samsung 226BW 22 WideScreen LCD - $291

Hello Greg,

Tuesday, April 17, 2007, 11:44:13 AM, you wrote:

 In gaming, the overriding concern is typically response time. To this 
end,

a
 TN+ panel is usually your best bet.

 If you were doing graphics work, I wouldn't consider anything but an 
S-IPS

 based display. S-PVA and P-MVA panels are good intermediate panels.

 My brother, an avid gamer, has a 4:3 20 Viewsonic VP2030b display. It
uses
 a P-MVA panel and does a very nice job all-around. I'd be inclined to go
for
 the Dell 2407WFP though. It uses a S-PVA panel and has a quite 
respectable

 response time, but your 6800 isn't going to run those games at native
 resolution (1920x1200) very well.


Yeah my 6800 is getting aged. I was looking at the Radeon X1950 Pro
AGP as an upgrade (a final one since this is an AGP system) However, I
was concerned about upgrading my PSU and also if the performance gain
would be that substantial. OK so Dell panels aren't so bad then? You
suggest 2407WFP Bryan suggested the 226BW. I don't mind (in fact I
expect to) paying for a quality panel.


--
Regards,
 joeuser - Still looking for the 'any' key...





_
Exercise your brain! Try Flexicon. 
http://games.msn.com/en/flexicon/default.htm?icid=flexicon_hmemailtaglineapril07




Re: Re[4]: [H] Samsung 226BW 22 WideScreen LCD - $291

2007-04-17 Thread Veech
I felt the same way at first but I have to say that my Dell 2005 FPW hasn't 
disappointed me, and I haven't noticed a difference in my gaming since I got 
the Dell a year ago.  I finally set my Nokia 17 CRT aside, and am enjoying 
the more efficient use of desktop space.  As the gap narrows, the trade-off 
becomes acceptable unless you are doing CAD work or a lot of text-related 
work.



- Original Message - 
From: Hayes Elkins [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2007 5:16 PM
Subject: RE: Re[4]: [H] Samsung 226BW 22 WideScreen LCD - $291


Zzzhuh? What's that? Discussions about superior displays? Wake 
me up when something tops my Sony 21 GDM-520 CRT (now 6 years old). I'll 
set my snooze alarm for next decade...zzz



;)



From: Greg Sevart [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: The Hardware List hardware@hardwaregroup.com
To: 'The Hardware List' hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: RE: Re[4]: [H] Samsung 226BW 22 WideScreen LCD  -   $291
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 16:01:55 -0500

Not all Dell panels are the same. The 2407WFP is more of their premium 
line,

whereas the E228WFP is a cheaper model. I'd stay away from the cheaper
panels, but the Ultrasharp models are typically quite decent. Of course,
I'd never buy a cheap display anyway. :)

Greg

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe User
Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2007 2:24 PM
To: 'The Hardware List'
Subject: Re[4]: [H] Samsung 226BW 22 WideScreen LCD - $291

Hello Greg,

Tuesday, April 17, 2007, 11:44:13 AM, you wrote:

 In gaming, the overriding concern is typically response time. To this
end,
a
 TN+ panel is usually your best bet.

 If you were doing graphics work, I wouldn't consider anything but an
S-IPS
 based display. S-PVA and P-MVA panels are good intermediate panels.

 My brother, an avid gamer, has a 4:3 20 Viewsonic VP2030b display. It
uses
 a P-MVA panel and does a very nice job all-around. I'd be inclined to 
 go

for
 the Dell 2407WFP though. It uses a S-PVA panel and has a quite
respectable
 response time, but your 6800 isn't going to run those games at native
 resolution (1920x1200) very well.


Yeah my 6800 is getting aged. I was looking at the Radeon X1950 Pro
AGP as an upgrade (a final one since this is an AGP system) However, I
was concerned about upgrading my PSU and also if the performance gain
would be that substantial. OK so Dell panels aren't so bad then? You
suggest 2407WFP Bryan suggested the 226BW. I don't mind (in fact I
expect to) paying for a quality panel.


--
Regards,
 joeuser - Still looking for the 'any' key...





_
Exercise your brain! Try Flexicon. 
http://games.msn.com/en/flexicon/default.htm?icid=flexicon_hmemailtaglineapril07






Re: Re[4]: [H] Samsung 226BW 22 WideScreen LCD - $291

2007-04-17 Thread Hayes Elkins





From: Veech [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Veech [EMAIL PROTECTED],The Hardware List 
hardware@hardwaregroup.com

To: The Hardware List hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: Re: Re[4]: [H] Samsung 226BW 22 WideScreen LCD - $291
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 17:20:15 -0700

I felt the same way at first but I have to say that my Dell 2005 FPW hasn't 
disappointed me, and I haven't noticed a difference in my gaming since I 
got the Dell a year ago.  I finally set my Nokia 17 CRT aside, and am 
enjoying the more efficient use of desktop space.  As the gap narrows, the 
trade-off becomes acceptable unless you are doing CAD work or a lot of 
text-related work.


The ghosting still stinks, and the ones that ghost the least have the worst 
color and black level. I hear that some 120hz LCDs are finally coming out 
(at least as TV sets). Congrats, welcome to 1999. At least 3:2 pulldown can 
finally die on an LCD. As long as I still have the desktop real estate, and 
as long as my eyesight stays eagle sharp - my big, ugly black  gray box 
stays put.


_
Mortgage refinance is Hot. *Terms. Get a 5.375%* fix rate. Check savings 
https://www2.nextag.com/goto.jsp?product=10035url=%2fst.jsptm=ysearch=mortgage_text_links_88_h2bbbdisc=yvers=925s=4056p=5117




RE: Re[4]: [H] Samsung 226BW 22 WideScreen LCD - $291

2007-04-17 Thread Greg Sevart
Yeah...I had a display that was equivalent (it was a HP-branded, Sony built
professional display, $1300 MSRP, used the same tube as your 520) and I
replaced it with a 20 WS LCD based on an LG.Philips S-IPS panel. I missed
the extra 150 pixels of vertical resolution, but I don't regret my decision
one bit.

I later added a 24 WS LCD...I can't stand looking at a glass monitor
anymore.

Greg

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hayes Elkins
Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2007 7:16 PM
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: RE: Re[4]: [H] Samsung 226BW 22 WideScreen LCD - $291

Zzzhuh? What's that? Discussions about superior displays? Wake 
me up when something tops my Sony 21 GDM-520 CRT (now 6 years old). I'll 
set my snooze alarm for next decade...zzz


;)


From: Greg Sevart [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: The Hardware List hardware@hardwaregroup.com
To: 'The Hardware List' hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: RE: Re[4]: [H] Samsung 226BW 22 WideScreen LCD  -   $291
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 16:01:55 -0500

Not all Dell panels are the same. The 2407WFP is more of their premium 
line,
whereas the E228WFP is a cheaper model. I'd stay away from the cheaper
panels, but the Ultrasharp models are typically quite decent. Of course,
I'd never buy a cheap display anyway. :)

Greg

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe User
Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2007 2:24 PM
To: 'The Hardware List'
Subject: Re[4]: [H] Samsung 226BW 22 WideScreen LCD - $291

Hello Greg,

Tuesday, April 17, 2007, 11:44:13 AM, you wrote:

  In gaming, the overriding concern is typically response time. To this 
end,
a
  TN+ panel is usually your best bet.

  If you were doing graphics work, I wouldn't consider anything but an 
S-IPS
  based display. S-PVA and P-MVA panels are good intermediate panels.

  My brother, an avid gamer, has a 4:3 20 Viewsonic VP2030b display. It
uses
  a P-MVA panel and does a very nice job all-around. I'd be inclined to go
for
  the Dell 2407WFP though. It uses a S-PVA panel and has a quite 
respectable
  response time, but your 6800 isn't going to run those games at native
  resolution (1920x1200) very well.


Yeah my 6800 is getting aged. I was looking at the Radeon X1950 Pro
AGP as an upgrade (a final one since this is an AGP system) However, I
was concerned about upgrading my PSU and also if the performance gain
would be that substantial. OK so Dell panels aren't so bad then? You
suggest 2407WFP Bryan suggested the 226BW. I don't mind (in fact I
expect to) paying for a quality panel.


--
Regards,
  joeuser - Still looking for the 'any' key...




_
Exercise your brain! Try Flexicon. 
http://games.msn.com/en/flexicon/default.htm?icid=flexicon_hmemailtaglineapr
il07





Re: [H] Samsung 226BW 22 WideScreen LCD - $291

2007-04-17 Thread Al Anger

Hayes Elkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  when something tops my Sony 21 GDM-520 CRT (now 6 years old)

Bzt *SNAP*  *POP*What's burning in here?

al (runs and hides)


[H] Samsung 226BW 22 WideScreen LCD - $291

2007-04-16 Thread Joe User
http://www.buy.com/retail/product.asp?sku=204021909adid=17051dcaid=17051

Samsung 226BW 22 WideScreen LCD Display 1000:1(DC 3000:1), 2ms, DVI - Black


List Price: $539.00
Our Price:  $310.95
Price After Rebate(s):  $290.95
Shipping:   FREE


Seems like a good deal...  or no?

-- 
Regards,
 joeuser - Still looking for the 'any' key...



RE: [H] Samsung 226BW 22 WideScreen LCD - $291

2007-04-16 Thread Greg Sevart
This model uses either a Samsung LTM220M1 or an AU Optronics M220EW01. Both
of these are TN Film type panels. They'll provide a good response rate and
are economical, at the expense of color reproduction (color depth and color
accuracy) and viewing angle. A good price on a moderately-sized panel,
though. 1680x1050 (WSXGA+) may be a bit low on the resolution. Most 20 WS
panels are 1680x1050, whereas most 24 WS panels are 1920x1200 (WUXGA).

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe User
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 7:28 PM
To: The Hardware List
Subject: [H] Samsung 226BW 22 WideScreen LCD - $291

http://www.buy.com/retail/product.asp?sku=204021909adid=17051dcaid=17051

Samsung 226BW 22 WideScreen LCD Display 1000:1(DC 3000:1), 2ms, DVI - Black


List Price: $539.00
Our Price:  $310.95
Price After Rebate(s):  $290.95
Shipping:   FREE


Seems like a good deal...  or no?

-- 
Regards,
 joeuser - Still looking for the 'any' key...





Re: [H] Samsung 226BW 22 WideScreen LCD - $291

2007-04-16 Thread Al Anger

Joe User [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 http://www.buy.com/retail/product.asp?sku=204021909adid=17051dcaid=17051
 
 Samsung 226BW 22 WideScreen LCD Display 1000:1(DC 3000:1), 2ms, DVI - Black

I picked up the 20 inch version about three weeks ago. Very happy with
it; except the piano finish attracts dust like mad. Came with a dust
rag, and I know why. Picture is sweet. I don't do much gaming, but
movies play very well.

best,
al


Re: [H] Samsung 226BW 22 WideScreen LCD - $291

2007-04-16 Thread Bryan Seitz
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 07:28:13PM -0500, Joe User wrote:
 http://www.buy.com/retail/product.asp?sku=204021909adid=17051dcaid=17051
 
 Samsung 226BW 22 WideScreen LCD Display 1000:1(DC 3000:1), 2ms, DVI - Black
 
 
 List Price: $539.00
 Our Price:  $310.95
 Price After Rebate(s):  $290.95
 Shipping:   FREE


DELL

DELL
E228WFP 22-inch Widescreen Flat Panel Monitor
Usually Ships 1-2 Days
Manufacturer Part# KU311
Dell Part# 320-5205


$279, no rebate needed.

-- 
 
Bryan G. Seitz


Re: [H] Samsung 226BW 22 WideScreen LCD - $291

2007-04-16 Thread JRS

I read the reviews, and actually they say this one *does* use the S panel
instead of the TN most others use, which would make this a screaming deal..
:)



This model uses either a Samsung LTM220M1 or an AU Optronics M220EW01. Both
of these are TN Film type panels. They'll provide a good response rate and
are economical, at the expense of color reproduction (color depth and color
accuracy) and viewing angle. A good price on a moderately-sized panel,
though. 1680x1050 (WSXGA+) may be a bit low on the resolution. Most 20 WS
panels are 1680x1050, whereas most 24 WS panels are 1920x1200 (WUXGA).

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe User
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 7:28 PM
To: The Hardware List
Subject: [H] Samsung 226BW 22 WideScreen LCD - $291

http://www.buy.com/retail/product.asp?sku=204021909adid=17051dcaid=17051

Samsung 226BW 22 WideScreen LCD Display 1000:1(DC 3000:1), 2ms, DVI - Black


List Price: $539.00
Our Price:  $310.95
Price After Rebate(s):  $290.95
Shipping:   FREE


Seems like a good deal...  or no?
-- 

JRS[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please remove  **X**  to reply...

...Cleverly Disguised As A Responsible Adult...


RE: [H] Samsung 226BW 22 WideScreen LCD - $291

2007-04-16 Thread Greg Sevart
They're both TN+ film panels. The S panel is simply the TN panel made by
Samsung. It's better than the AUO, but still is a TN+.

Greg

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of JRS
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 8:46 PM
To: The Hardware List
Subject: Re: [H] Samsung 226BW 22 WideScreen LCD - $291


I read the reviews, and actually they say this one *does* use the S panel
instead of the TN most others use, which would make this a screaming deal..
:)



This model uses either a Samsung LTM220M1 or an AU Optronics M220EW01.
Both
of these are TN Film type panels. They'll provide a good response rate and
are economical, at the expense of color reproduction (color depth and
color
accuracy) and viewing angle. A good price on a moderately-sized panel,
though. 1680x1050 (WSXGA+) may be a bit low on the resolution. Most 20 WS
panels are 1680x1050, whereas most 24 WS panels are 1920x1200 (WUXGA).

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe User
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 7:28 PM
To: The Hardware List
Subject: [H] Samsung 226BW 22 WideScreen LCD - $291

http://www.buy.com/retail/product.asp?sku=204021909adid=17051dcaid=17051

Samsung 226BW 22 WideScreen LCD Display 1000:1(DC 3000:1), 2ms, DVI -
Black


List Price: $539.00
Our Price:  $310.95
Price After Rebate(s):  $290.95
Shipping:   FREE


Seems like a good deal...  or no?
-- 

JRS[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please remove  **X**  to reply...

...Cleverly Disguised As A Responsible Adult...