Re: [H] VPN problems

2009-02-12 Thread Christopher Fisk

On Thu, 12 Feb 2009, mark.dodge wrote:


Using plink to logon to putty running on a windows box would be a rough
learning curve for the owner much less me not knowing that much about it.


You kidding?  All you do is set up the putty connection.

Have a batch file with the following:

start plink -load office -pw mypassword
start mstsc.exe (or whatever the damn executable for terminal services is)

Tell them when they hear the BEEP, to hit connect on the terminal services 
client and they're in.



No learning curve other than double clicking shortcut and clicking connect 
after the audible beep.



Christopher Fisk
--
"If the terriers and bariffs are torn down, this economy will grow."
George W. Bush, January 7, 2000
Spoken in Rochester, New York during presidential campaign.

--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.



Re: [H] VPN problems

2009-02-12 Thread mark.dodge
Using plink to logon to putty running on a windows box would be a rough
learning curve for the owner much less me not knowing that much about it.

-Original Message-
From: hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com
[mailto:hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com] On Behalf Of Christopher Fisk
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2009 08:39
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: Re: [H] VPN problems

On Tue, 10 Feb 2009, Christopher Fisk wrote:

> On Tue, 10 Feb 2009, mark.dodge wrote:
>
>>  Come on there are a lot of network guys here, can anyone give me any
>>  suggestions? I really need to get this resolved. Someone just tell me
the
>>  way they would set it up and I can start there. I'm thinking that
>>  eliminating the router and configuring one of the NICs for NAT and the
>>  other
>>  for the terminal services, is that correct?
>
> What are you trying to use for VPN?  Windows 2003 RAS?  I've never really 
> worked with the RAS settings in Windows, so I can't say one way or another
if 
> that is a good idea.
>
> Your best solution (IMO) is to do the following:
>
> Setup a small linux box (anything better than a P1 with 64MB memory will
work) 
> and install ssh on it.  Setup a few user accounts for people who will
connect 
> remotely.
>
> Forward the ssh port from the router to that linux box.
>
> Setup Putty with port forwarding for remote desktop.
>
>
>
> There you go, you're in.  No more worrying about windows VPN.
>
>
> Hell, you can test all this with a Gentoo LiveCD.


Another valid (But untested by me) method would be to use the sshwindows 
package of openssh.

http://sshwindows.sourceforge.net/

Install that on a windows machine that is always on (maybe even the 
server?) and setup the ssh forward to go there.  Login with Putty, forward 
local port 3390 to the IP of the windows server, use remote desktop and 
connect from the client to localhost:3390 once you're connected with 
putty.

Can even setup a batch file to call plink and remote desktop

>
>
>
> Christopher Fisk
>

-- 
You know you're using the computer too much when:
Reading a text document on paper and getting angry when you realized it
doesn't
have a Find command
-- martinbishop

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.



Re: [H] VPN problems

2009-02-10 Thread Christopher Fisk

On Tue, 10 Feb 2009, Christopher Fisk wrote:


On Tue, 10 Feb 2009, mark.dodge wrote:


 Come on there are a lot of network guys here, can anyone give me any
 suggestions? I really need to get this resolved. Someone just tell me the
 way they would set it up and I can start there. I'm thinking that
 eliminating the router and configuring one of the NICs for NAT and the
 other
 for the terminal services, is that correct?


What are you trying to use for VPN?  Windows 2003 RAS?  I've never really 
worked with the RAS settings in Windows, so I can't say one way or another if 
that is a good idea.


Your best solution (IMO) is to do the following:

Setup a small linux box (anything better than a P1 with 64MB memory will work) 
and install ssh on it.  Setup a few user accounts for people who will connect 
remotely.


Forward the ssh port from the router to that linux box.

Setup Putty with port forwarding for remote desktop.



There you go, you're in.  No more worrying about windows VPN.


Hell, you can test all this with a Gentoo LiveCD.



Another valid (But untested by me) method would be to use the sshwindows 
package of openssh.


http://sshwindows.sourceforge.net/

Install that on a windows machine that is always on (maybe even the 
server?) and setup the ssh forward to go there.  Login with Putty, forward 
local port 3390 to the IP of the windows server, use remote desktop and 
connect from the client to localhost:3390 once you're connected with 
putty.


Can even setup a batch file to call plink and remote desktop





Christopher Fisk



--
You know you're using the computer too much when:
Reading a text document on paper and getting angry when you realized it doesn't
have a Find command
-- martinbishop

--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.



Re: [H] VPN problems

2009-02-10 Thread Christopher Fisk

On Tue, 10 Feb 2009, mark.dodge wrote:


Come on there are a lot of network guys here, can anyone give me any
suggestions? I really need to get this resolved. Someone just tell me the
way they would set it up and I can start there. I'm thinking that
eliminating the router and configuring one of the NICs for NAT and the other
for the terminal services, is that correct?


What are you trying to use for VPN?  Windows 2003 RAS?  I've never really 
worked with the RAS settings in Windows, so I can't say one way or another 
if that is a good idea.


Your best solution (IMO) is to do the following:

Setup a small linux box (anything better than a P1 with 64MB memory will 
work) and install ssh on it.  Setup a few user accounts for people who 
will connect remotely.


Forward the ssh port from the router to that linux box.

Setup Putty with port forwarding for remote desktop.



There you go, you're in.  No more worrying about windows VPN.


Hell, you can test all this with a Gentoo LiveCD.



Christopher Fisk
--
Book: "The destination's not important.  How you get there's the worthier
part."
--Episode #1, "Serenity"

--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.



Re: [H] VPN problems

2009-02-10 Thread mark.dodge
Come on there are a lot of network guys here, can anyone give me any
suggestions? I really need to get this resolved. Someone just tell me the
way they would set it up and I can start there. I'm thinking that
eliminating the router and configuring one of the NICs for NAT and the other
for the terminal services, is that correct? 

-Original Message-
From: hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com
[mailto:hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com] On Behalf Of mark.dodge
Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2009 17:37
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: Re: [H] VPN problems

What would be better, continue using the router then do port forwarding,
which I'm still not sure of or get rid of the router and use the two NICs,
one for the terminal server and the other for the share to the internet? Do
I assign a static IP with the sub net  of the private range or use the
static IP I have and set the server as a DNS server also? I have been
reading some on the net and it is getting more and more confusing all the
while. If I go the two NIC route, I still need some kind of firewall to keep
all but what I want out making it more complicated but necessary. Do I need
to then share the connection from that NIC so that not only the server can
see the Internet but also the terminals need to  see out.

-Original Message-
From: hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com
[mailto:hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com] On Behalf Of Christopher Fisk
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 1:03 PM
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: Re: [H] VPN problems

On Thu, 5 Feb 2009, mark.dodge wrote:

> I have one Windows 2003 server running Terminal Services set up in each of
> three offices that I would like to get into from the outside world, one to
> be able to do some admin stuff without having to go to each office and
> another for the owner to be able to look at the cameras hooked up to each
> store. I have attempted to use VPN to do this and although I can ping the
IP
> address I cannot log into the server. What are some things I need to look
> for? I have two NICs in the server one for terminal services internal and
> one for the vpn. The one office I am doing this at first has a static IP
> address and I have set the router to do vpn pass-through or at least I
think
> I have it right. The router is a D-Link DI 808HV. I'll be honest I think I
> bit off more than I can chew on this project I can set up internal LANs
but
> not much experience with getting them seen from outside, most of the time
it
> is preventing access from outside baddies. I also need later to set up a
> cluster outside of the offices for fail safe and backup of all three
> servers, but that is another project altogether that I am still doing
> research on. I have to be able currently for the owner to log into either
of
> the servers and see an app that is running on them to see if and when he
has
> appointments and to do end of day and week and monthly reports, etc. and
> then also to check on the cameras, and of course for me to add or delete
> users and so forth, They all are working as Terminal Servers just fine
> within each office, so at least I got that right.


Is the subnet you are on the same as the remote subnet?  (I.E. 
192.168.0.0/24 at your computer and the same subnet at the office?).  That 
can cause routing issues with certain VPN software (Other software is 
smart enough to get around that.)


Also with multiple NIC's in the server you might be running into a routing 
issue.  Less likely if you're able to ping, but sometimes the VPN software 
will respond to pings no matter what (very annoying)



Christopher Fisk
-- 
Leela: Oh no, there's no exhaust pipe.
Project Satan: That's right. Thanks to Ed Begley Jr.'s electric motor, the 
most evil propulsion system ever conceived!

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.



Re: [H] VPN problems

2009-02-07 Thread mark.dodge
What would be better, continue using the router then do port forwarding,
which I'm still not sure of or get rid of the router and use the two NICs,
one for the terminal server and the other for the share to the internet? Do
I assign a static IP with the sub net  of the private range or use the
static IP I have and set the server as a DNS server also? I have been
reading some on the net and it is getting more and more confusing all the
while. If I go the two NIC route, I still need some kind of firewall to keep
all but what I want out making it more complicated but necessary. Do I need
to then share the connection from that NIC so that not only the server can
see the Internet but also the terminals need to  see out.

-Original Message-
From: hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com
[mailto:hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com] On Behalf Of Christopher Fisk
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 1:03 PM
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: Re: [H] VPN problems

On Thu, 5 Feb 2009, mark.dodge wrote:

> I have one Windows 2003 server running Terminal Services set up in each of
> three offices that I would like to get into from the outside world, one to
> be able to do some admin stuff without having to go to each office and
> another for the owner to be able to look at the cameras hooked up to each
> store. I have attempted to use VPN to do this and although I can ping the
IP
> address I cannot log into the server. What are some things I need to look
> for? I have two NICs in the server one for terminal services internal and
> one for the vpn. The one office I am doing this at first has a static IP
> address and I have set the router to do vpn pass-through or at least I
think
> I have it right. The router is a D-Link DI 808HV. I'll be honest I think I
> bit off more than I can chew on this project I can set up internal LANs
but
> not much experience with getting them seen from outside, most of the time
it
> is preventing access from outside baddies. I also need later to set up a
> cluster outside of the offices for fail safe and backup of all three
> servers, but that is another project altogether that I am still doing
> research on. I have to be able currently for the owner to log into either
of
> the servers and see an app that is running on them to see if and when he
has
> appointments and to do end of day and week and monthly reports, etc. and
> then also to check on the cameras, and of course for me to add or delete
> users and so forth, They all are working as Terminal Servers just fine
> within each office, so at least I got that right.


Is the subnet you are on the same as the remote subnet?  (I.E. 
192.168.0.0/24 at your computer and the same subnet at the office?).  That 
can cause routing issues with certain VPN software (Other software is 
smart enough to get around that.)


Also with multiple NIC's in the server you might be running into a routing 
issue.  Less likely if you're able to ping, but sometimes the VPN software 
will respond to pings no matter what (very annoying)



Christopher Fisk
-- 
Leela: Oh no, there's no exhaust pipe.
Project Satan: That's right. Thanks to Ed Begley Jr.'s electric motor, the 
most evil propulsion system ever conceived!

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.



Re: [H] VPN problems

2009-02-05 Thread Christopher Fisk

On Thu, 5 Feb 2009, mark.dodge wrote:


I have one Windows 2003 server running Terminal Services set up in each of
three offices that I would like to get into from the outside world, one to
be able to do some admin stuff without having to go to each office and
another for the owner to be able to look at the cameras hooked up to each
store. I have attempted to use VPN to do this and although I can ping the IP
address I cannot log into the server. What are some things I need to look
for? I have two NICs in the server one for terminal services internal and
one for the vpn. The one office I am doing this at first has a static IP
address and I have set the router to do vpn pass-through or at least I think
I have it right. The router is a D-Link DI 808HV. I'll be honest I think I
bit off more than I can chew on this project I can set up internal LANs but
not much experience with getting them seen from outside, most of the time it
is preventing access from outside baddies. I also need later to set up a
cluster outside of the offices for fail safe and backup of all three
servers, but that is another project altogether that I am still doing
research on. I have to be able currently for the owner to log into either of
the servers and see an app that is running on them to see if and when he has
appointments and to do end of day and week and monthly reports, etc. and
then also to check on the cameras, and of course for me to add or delete
users and so forth, They all are working as Terminal Servers just fine
within each office, so at least I got that right.



Is the subnet you are on the same as the remote subnet?  (I.E. 
192.168.0.0/24 at your computer and the same subnet at the office?).  That 
can cause routing issues with certain VPN software (Other software is 
smart enough to get around that.)



Also with multiple NIC's in the server you might be running into a routing 
issue.  Less likely if you're able to ping, but sometimes the VPN software 
will respond to pings no matter what (very annoying)




Christopher Fisk
--
Leela: Oh no, there's no exhaust pipe.
Project Satan: That's right. Thanks to Ed Begley Jr.'s electric motor, the 
most evil propulsion system ever conceived!


--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.



[H] VPN problems

2009-02-05 Thread mark.dodge
I have one Windows 2003 server running Terminal Services set up in each of
three offices that I would like to get into from the outside world, one to
be able to do some admin stuff without having to go to each office and
another for the owner to be able to look at the cameras hooked up to each
store. I have attempted to use VPN to do this and although I can ping the IP
address I cannot log into the server. What are some things I need to look
for? I have two NICs in the server one for terminal services internal and
one for the vpn. The one office I am doing this at first has a static IP
address and I have set the router to do vpn pass-through or at least I think
I have it right. The router is a D-Link DI 808HV. I'll be honest I think I
bit off more than I can chew on this project I can set up internal LANs but
not much experience with getting them seen from outside, most of the time it
is preventing access from outside baddies. I also need later to set up a
cluster outside of the offices for fail safe and backup of all three
servers, but that is another project altogether that I am still doing
research on. I have to be able currently for the owner to log into either of
the servers and see an app that is running on them to see if and when he has
appointments and to do end of day and week and monthly reports, etc. and
then also to check on the cameras, and of course for me to add or delete
users and so forth, They all are working as Terminal Servers just fine
within each office, so at least I got that right.

 

Mark

MD Computers, Houston, TX