Re: [testing] test suite layout, testNG, and more
On 10/9/06, Richard Liang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 10/9/06, Mikhail Loenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What is the status of our discussions about new test suite layout? Long ago we decided not to move existing tests until we finish with that discussion but the discussion seems to be either dead or in coma It's not dead ;-) We are waiting for the completion of j.u.concurrent so that we could run a pilot and continue our discussion. Looking forward to ... btw, Harmony may also benifit from failure and rerun feature of TestNG. I believe developers will like it! Does it make sense to continue putting the tests in order (according to the old model) and relayout them as soon as we finish the discussion? Yes, it does make sense. Before we draw any new conclusion about TestNG, I suggest we follow our existing testing conventions/guidelines. Thanks, Mikhail - Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Richard Liang China Development Lab, IBM - Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Best regards, Andrew Zhang
Re: [testing] test suite layout, testNG, and more
On 10/11/06, Andrew Zhang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 10/9/06, Richard Liang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 10/9/06, Mikhail Loenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What is the status of our discussions about new test suite layout? Long ago we decided not to move existing tests until we finish with that discussion but the discussion seems to be either dead or in coma It's not dead ;-) We are waiting for the completion of j.u.concurrent so that we could run a pilot and continue our discussion. Looking forward to ... btw, Harmony may also benifit from failure and rerun feature of TestNG. I believe developers will like it! Sure ;-) Does it make sense to continue putting the tests in order (according to the old model) and relayout them as soon as we finish the discussion? Yes, it does make sense. Before we draw any new conclusion about TestNG, I suggest we follow our existing testing conventions/guidelines. Thanks, Mikhail - Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Richard Liang China Development Lab, IBM - Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Best regards, Andrew Zhang -- Richard Liang China Development Lab, IBM - Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [testing] test suite layout, testNG, and more
On 10/9/06, Mikhail Loenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What is the status of our discussions about new test suite layout? Long ago we decided not to move existing tests until we finish with that discussion but the discussion seems to be either dead or in coma It's not dead ;-) We are waiting for the completion of j.u.concurrent so that we could run a pilot and continue our discussion. Does it make sense to continue putting the tests in order (according to the old model) and relayout them as soon as we finish the discussion? Yes, it does make sense. Before we draw any new conclusion about TestNG, I suggest we follow our existing testing conventions/guidelines. Thanks, Mikhail - Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Richard Liang China Development Lab, IBM - Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[testing] test suite layout, testNG, and more
What is the status of our discussions about new test suite layout? Long ago we decided not to move existing tests until we finish with that discussion but the discussion seems to be either dead or in coma Does it make sense to continue putting the tests in order (according to the old model) and relayout them as soon as we finish the discussion? Thanks, Mikhail - Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
