Re: [Haskell-cafe] ANN: hakyll-0.1

2009-12-08 Thread Ketil Malde
minh thu  writes:

> I wonder how APIs are covered. 

I don't think an API would be covered.  The API is the standard way to
use something, if copyright licenses cover usage like this, any
executable will be a derivative of the operating system and (possibly)
the compiler. 

> Why should your code be licensed under GPL?

I think your code is covered by whatever license you wish.

An aggregate work, on the other hand, would need to be covered by the
GPL, and all source code would have to be available under GPL terms.  So
if you distribute your code linked to or incorporating the GPL library,
the whole must conform to the GPL license (source availability and
redistributatbility, etc). 

Your contributions could still be licensed under a different license
(e.g. BSD), as long as the licensing doesn't prevent somebody else to
pick it up and relicense it under GPL.

At least, that's how I understand things.

-k
-- 
If I haven't seen further, it is by standing in the footprints of giants
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe


Re: [Haskell-cafe] ANN: hakyll-0.1

2009-12-08 Thread minh thu
2009/12/8 Ivan Lazar Miljenovic :
> Gregory Crosswhite  writes:
>> That really just means that BSD3 code can be used in GPL code; you
>> still have to release your own code as GPL if you are including any
>> GPL code.
>
> Not quite true: it means that any code your BSD3 library gets used in
> has to have a GPL-compatible license:
>
> http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/gpl-faq.html#IfLibraryIsGPL
>
> (this is the approach I've used for Graphalyze since I use Pandoc as a
> default library for document generation; later on I'm planning on
> re-doing the document part in which case it will _have_ to use Pandoc
> and thus I'll re-license the library).

I wonder how APIs are covered. If your code use an API implemented by
Pandoc (GPL) and also by another library licensed under, say, BSD3.
Why should your code be licensed under GPL ? The only difference would
be a build-depends in the .cabal. Has anyone an idea about this ?

Cheers,
Thu
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe


Re: [Haskell-cafe] ANN: hakyll-0.1

2009-12-08 Thread Ivan Lazar Miljenovic
Gregory Crosswhite  writes:
> That really just means that BSD3 code can be used in GPL code; you
> still have to release your own code as GPL if you are including any
> GPL code.

Not quite true: it means that any code your BSD3 library gets used in
has to have a GPL-compatible license:

http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/gpl-faq.html#IfLibraryIsGPL

(this is the approach I've used for Graphalyze since I use Pandoc as a
default library for document generation; later on I'm planning on
re-doing the document part in which case it will _have_ to use Pandoc
and thus I'll re-license the library).
-- 
Ivan Lazar Miljenovic
ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com
IvanMiljenovic.wordpress.com
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe


Re: [Haskell-cafe] ANN: hakyll-0.1

2009-12-08 Thread Magnus Therning
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 8:22 AM, Gregory Crosswhite
[..]
> If Pandoc is LGPL, then I think that means we are dealing with an entirely 
> different situation, one in which the library user can choose whatever 
> license he or she likes for his or her own code as long as any modifications 
> to the LGPL'd library itself are released under the LGPL.

As has been discussed a few times before on this list, using LGPL for
Haskell modules has its own set of problems when using GHC, due to the
current state of linking in that compiler.  From what I've read we're
on a path to salvation with 6.12, but we're still not at the
destination.

/M

-- 
Magnus Therning(OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4)
magnus@therning.org  Jabber: magnus@therning.org
http://therning.org/magnus identi.ca|twitter: magthe
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe


RE: [Haskell-cafe] ANN: hakyll-0.1

2009-12-08 Thread Sittampalam, Ganesh
Gregory Crosswhite wrote:
>> Tom Tobin wrote:
>> 
>> The 3 clause BSD license is officially a GPL compatible license. 
>> See: 
>> 
>>   
>> http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#GPLCompatibleLicenses 
>> 
>> It is within the terms of the GPL to link GPL code to a bunch of BSD3
>> code as long as you abide by both the GPL and the BSD3 license.
> 
> That really just means that BSD3 code can be used in GPL code;  you
> still have to release your own code as GPL if you are including any
> GPL code.  

The main licence of darcs is GPL, but I've licensed all my contributions
to it as BSD3. My view of this is that while darcs as a whole is
obviously still GPL, any of my contributions that can be extracted
independently can be used in other projects under BSD3.

I'd say that with hakyll, the library itself can be under BSD3 but any
executable you produce from it at the moment will necessarily be GPL.
Not sure if there's any good way to communicate this fact in the
metadata, though.

Ganesh

=== 
 Please access the attached hyperlink for an important electronic 
communications disclaimer: 
 http://www.credit-suisse.com/legal/en/disclaimer_email_ib.html 
 
=== 
 
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe


Re: [Haskell-cafe] ANN: hakyll-0.1

2009-12-08 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
Gregory Crosswhite wrote:

> >> I *really* wish Pandoc would switch to a non-copyleft license.
> > 
> > The LGPL is still a copyleft license. Do you still have a problem
> > with that?
> 
> If Pandoc is LGPL,

I wasn't suggesting that pandoc was LGPL, I was probing the other 
posters attitudes to copyleft licenses other than the GPL.

Erik
-- 
--
Erik de Castro Lopo
http://www.mega-nerd.com/
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe


Re: [Haskell-cafe] ANN: hakyll-0.1

2009-12-08 Thread Gregory Crosswhite
> Tom Tobin wrote:
> 
> The 3 clause BSD license is officially a GPL compatible license.  See:
> 
>http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#GPLCompatibleLicenses
> 
> It is within the terms of the GPL to link GPL code to a bunch of BSD3 code
> as long as you abide by both the GPL and the BSD3 license.

That really just means that BSD3 code can be used in GPL code;  you still have 
to release your own code as GPL if you are including any GPL code.

Having said that...

>> I *really* wish Pandoc would switch to a non-copyleft license.
> 
> The LGPL is still a copyleft license. Do you still have a problem
> with that?

If Pandoc is LGPL, then I think that means we are dealing with an entirely 
different situation, one in which the library user can choose whatever license 
he or she likes for his or her own code as long as any modifications to the 
LGPL'd library itself are released under the LGPL.

Cheers,
Greg

___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe


Re: [Haskell-cafe] ANN: hakyll-0.1

2009-12-07 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
Tom Tobin wrote:

> I hate to say this, but it looks like you're violating the GPL by not
> releasing Hakyll under the GPL, since Pandoc is GPL'd.

Not necessarily.

The 3 clause BSD license is officially a GPL compatible license.  See:

http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#GPLCompatibleLicenses

It is within the terms of the GPL to link GPL code to a bunch of BSD3 code
as long as you abide by both the GPL and the BSD3 license.

Hakyll would only run into trouble if it was used as a library that linked
to code which was not under a GPL compatible license.

> I *really* wish Pandoc would switch to a non-copyleft license.

The LGPL is still a copyleft license. Do you still have a problem
with that?

> (Pretty please, with sugar and cherries on top?)

Most chunks of code can't switch license because they have dozens of
contributions from dozens of people many of whom they no longer have
contact with.

Erik
-- 
--
Erik de Castro Lopo
http://www.mega-nerd.com/
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe


Re: [Haskell-cafe] ANN: hakyll-0.1

2009-12-07 Thread Jasper Van der Jeugt
Okay,

You're right. I will change the license info as soon as possible.

Kind regards,
Jasper Van der Jeugt

On Dec 8, 2009 6:30 AM, "Tom Tobin"  wrote:

On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 6:35 AM, Jasper van der Jeugt 
wrote: > Hakyll is a simp...
I hate to say this, but it looks like you're violating the GPL by not
releasing Hakyll under the GPL, since Pandoc is GPL'd.  I don't think
you're alone in this — IIRC I've seen several Hackage libraries doing
the same thing.

I *really* wish Pandoc would switch to a non-copyleft license.
(Pretty please, with sugar and cherries on top?)  I know that GPL
authors are trying to enforce contributions, but the opposite can very
well happen: if you have an "essential" copyleft library, someone's
eventually going to write a non-copyleft replacement for it (e.g.,
witness the replacements for Readline) rather than continue to allow
it to restrict the licensing options of the community.  Great
libraries should be able to be embraced without reservations.
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe


Re: [Haskell-cafe] ANN: hakyll-0.1

2009-12-07 Thread Tom Tobin
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 6:35 AM, Jasper van der Jeugt
 wrote:
> Hakyll is a simple static site generator library, mostly aimed at blogs. It
> supports markdown, tex and html templates.
>
> It is inspired by the ruby Jekyll program. It has a very small codebase
> because it makes extensive use of the excellent pandoc and Text.Template
> libraries.
>
> More information can be found on:
> http://hackage.haskell.org/package/hakyll-0.1
> http://github.com/jaspervdj/Hakyll

I hate to say this, but it looks like you're violating the GPL by not
releasing Hakyll under the GPL, since Pandoc is GPL'd.  I don't think
you're alone in this — IIRC I've seen several Hackage libraries doing
the same thing.

I *really* wish Pandoc would switch to a non-copyleft license.
(Pretty please, with sugar and cherries on top?)  I know that GPL
authors are trying to enforce contributions, but the opposite can very
well happen: if you have an "essential" copyleft library, someone's
eventually going to write a non-copyleft replacement for it (e.g.,
witness the replacements for Readline) rather than continue to allow
it to restrict the licensing options of the community.  Great
libraries should be able to be embraced without reservations.
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe


[Haskell-cafe] ANN: hakyll-0.1

2009-12-05 Thread Jasper van der Jeugt

Hello all,

Hakyll is a simple static site generator library, mostly aimed at blogs. 
It supports markdown, tex and html templates.


It is inspired by the ruby Jekyll program. It has a very small codebase 
because it makes extensive use of the excellent pandoc and Text.Template 
libraries.


More information can be found on:
http://hackage.haskell.org/package/hakyll-0.1
http://github.com/jaspervdj/Hakyll

Kind regards,
Jasper Van der Jeugt
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe