[Haskell-cafe] Re: Trying to fix space leak

2007-12-31 Thread Achim Schneider
Jake McArthur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I disagree. It might be the case that the _contents_ of the data  
 structure are lazy, in which case I would say the relevant
 constructor parameters should be made strict. As long as the
 structural parts are still lazy it should be okay.
 
 And there's no harm in experimenting. :)
 
Or, for that matter, guessing what -ddump-simpl looks like.

Which I never, ever, do. Seriously.

*lightens a cracker and runs away*

-- 
(c) this sig last receiving data processing entity. Inspect headers for
past copyright information. All rights reserved. Unauthorised copying,
hiring, renting, public performance and/or broadcasting of this
signature prohibited. 

___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe


Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Trying to fix space leak

2007-12-31 Thread Jake McArthur

On Dec 31, 2007, at 11:21 AM, Achim Schneider wrote:


Jake McArthur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


I disagree. It might be the case that the _contents_ of the data
structure are lazy, in which case I would say the relevant
constructor parameters should be made strict. As long as the
structural parts are still lazy it should be okay.

And there's no harm in experimenting. :)


Or, for that matter, guessing what -ddump-simpl looks like.

Which I never, ever, do. Seriously.


Touché.___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe