[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-14431) RBF: Rename with multiple subclusters should fail if no eligible locations
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14431?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17245172#comment-17245172
]
Jinglun commented on HDFS-14431:
Hi [~ayushtkn], thanks your comments.
{quote}the client call shall also fail, The client would shoot it's call to
another Router, in a similar manor if one Namenode crashes,
{quote}
Agree with you ! I'll start working on the 'federation rename' and prepare for
an initial design doc.
> RBF: Rename with multiple subclusters should fail if no eligible locations
> --
>
> Key: HDFS-14431
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14431
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Sub-task
>Reporter: Íñigo Goiri
>Assignee: Íñigo Goiri
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.001.patch,
> HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.002.patch, HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.003.patch,
> HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.004.patch, HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.005.patch,
> HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.006.patch, HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.007.patch
>
>
> Currently, the rename will fail with FileNotFoundException which is not clear
> to the user.
> The operation should fail stating the reason is that there are no eligible
> destinations.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-14431) RBF: Rename with multiple subclusters should fail if no eligible locations
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14431?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17243793#comment-17243793 ] Ayush Saxena commented on HDFS-14431: - Thanx [~LiJinglun] for the response, Sorry, I missed the notification Yes the client timeout shall be a problem, distCp is gonna take time. But just for the sake of knowledge, if the client has timeout sorted, or he isn't renaming too big files, Can we try implementing just a basic distCp stuff, May be mark it as optional and turned off by default. Regarding failover, I am not sure that is something needed, If the Router crashes, the client call shall also fail, The client would shoot it's call to another Router, in a similar manor if one Namenode crashes, Yahh, there would be performance issues, but that we can consider, once at least a basic rename framework works. :) > RBF: Rename with multiple subclusters should fail if no eligible locations > -- > > Key: HDFS-14431 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14431 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: Sub-task >Reporter: Íñigo Goiri >Assignee: Íñigo Goiri >Priority: Major > Attachments: HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.001.patch, > HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.002.patch, HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.003.patch, > HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.004.patch, HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.005.patch, > HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.006.patch, HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.007.patch > > > Currently, the rename will fail with FileNotFoundException which is not clear > to the user. > The operation should fail stating the reason is that there are no eligible > destinations. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-14431) RBF: Rename with multiple subclusters should fail if no eligible locations
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14431?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17216512#comment-17216512
]
Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-14431:
--
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Logfile || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m
0s{color} | | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} patch {color} | {color:red} 0m 21s{color}
| | {color:red} HDFS-14431 does not apply to HDFS-13891. Rebase required?
Wrong Branch? See https://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HowToContribute for help.
{color} |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| JIRA Issue | HDFS-14431 |
| JIRA Patch URL |
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12969060/HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.007.patch
|
| Console output |
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/239/console |
| versions | git=2.17.1 |
| Powered by | Apache Yetus 0.13.0-SNAPSHOT https://yetus.apache.org |
This message was automatically generated.
> RBF: Rename with multiple subclusters should fail if no eligible locations
> --
>
> Key: HDFS-14431
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14431
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Sub-task
>Reporter: Íñigo Goiri
>Assignee: Íñigo Goiri
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.001.patch,
> HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.002.patch, HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.003.patch,
> HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.004.patch, HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.005.patch,
> HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.006.patch, HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.007.patch
>
>
> Currently, the rename will fail with FileNotFoundException which is not clear
> to the user.
> The operation should fail stating the reason is that there are no eligible
> destinations.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-14431) RBF: Rename with multiple subclusters should fail if no eligible locations
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14431?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17216158#comment-17216158 ] Jinglun commented on HDFS-14431: Hi [~ayushtkn], the HDFS-15294 only supports using a command to rename a path to another namespace. To rename across Namespaces there are some future works to do: 1) Give Router the ability to rename across Namespaces. To implement this we need let HDFS-15294 run in the Router. One thing needs to be carefully thought is if one Router crashes, how does the 'balance jobs' failover to other Router. 2) The client-side timeout. Rename across namespaces takes much longer than normal rename(it uses distcp) and definitely would cause the client rpc timeout. > RBF: Rename with multiple subclusters should fail if no eligible locations > -- > > Key: HDFS-14431 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14431 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: Sub-task >Reporter: Íñigo Goiri >Assignee: Íñigo Goiri >Priority: Major > Attachments: HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.001.patch, > HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.002.patch, HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.003.patch, > HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.004.patch, HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.005.patch, > HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.006.patch, HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.007.patch > > > Currently, the rename will fail with FileNotFoundException which is not clear > to the user. > The operation should fail stating the reason is that there are no eligible > destinations. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-14431) RBF: Rename with multiple subclusters should fail if no eligible locations
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14431?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17216131#comment-17216131 ] Ayush Saxena commented on HDFS-14431: - Provided we have now HDFS-15294 and which started with an intent of supporting renames at HDFS-15087. Should we not leverage that and support rename across Namespaces? Or is there some reason we can't use it for rename? Casually thinking about it, I don't feel there would be any problem. [~elgoiri] [~LiJinglun] [~linyiqun] [~aajisaka] any thoughts on concluding renames? > RBF: Rename with multiple subclusters should fail if no eligible locations > -- > > Key: HDFS-14431 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14431 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: Sub-task >Reporter: Íñigo Goiri >Assignee: Íñigo Goiri >Priority: Major > Attachments: HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.001.patch, > HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.002.patch, HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.003.patch, > HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.004.patch, HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.005.patch, > HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.006.patch, HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.007.patch > > > Currently, the rename will fail with FileNotFoundException which is not clear > to the user. > The operation should fail stating the reason is that there are no eligible > destinations. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-14431) RBF: Rename with multiple subclusters should fail if no eligible locations
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14431?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16930833#comment-16930833
]
Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-14431:
--
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m
0s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} patch {color} | {color:red} 0m 9s{color}
| {color:red} HDFS-14431 does not apply to HDFS-13891. Rebase required? Wrong
Branch? See https://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HowToContribute for help. {color} |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| JIRA Issue | HDFS-14431 |
| JIRA Patch URL |
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12969060/HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.007.patch
|
| Console output |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/27887/console |
| Powered by | Apache Yetus 0.8.0 http://yetus.apache.org |
This message was automatically generated.
> RBF: Rename with multiple subclusters should fail if no eligible locations
> --
>
> Key: HDFS-14431
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14431
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Sub-task
>Reporter: Íñigo Goiri
>Assignee: Íñigo Goiri
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.001.patch,
> HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.002.patch, HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.003.patch,
> HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.004.patch, HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.005.patch,
> HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.006.patch, HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.007.patch
>
>
> Currently, the rename will fail with FileNotFoundException which is not clear
> to the user.
> The operation should fail stating the reason is that there are no eligible
> destinations.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.2#803003)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-14431) RBF: Rename with multiple subclusters should fail if no eligible locations
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14431?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16930830#comment-16930830 ] CR Hota commented on HDFS-14431: [~elgoiri] Many thanks for all the work done so far. Took a look at the patch and approach seems error prone as the operations in totality are NOT atomic. Filesystems are not transactional in nature. Since rename is very hard to get right, may I suggest we approach it as we did with some other features. Let's come up with a design doc and write down the issues, possible approaches and what all use cases we can solve and can't. We can all collaborate. Please count me in. For someone new, its very hard to get the context of what is being solved and what use cases are not. On a side note, with the lack of atomic renames here is how we are approaching renames in the short term. Most query engines (ex Hive) are equipped to handle rename failure by initiating a copy. In the scenario where rename is across clusters, hive is instructed to invoke a copy operation. FYI [~ayushtkn] [~xuzq_zander] > RBF: Rename with multiple subclusters should fail if no eligible locations > -- > > Key: HDFS-14431 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14431 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: Sub-task >Reporter: Íñigo Goiri >Assignee: Íñigo Goiri >Priority: Major > Attachments: HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.001.patch, > HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.002.patch, HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.003.patch, > HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.004.patch, HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.005.patch, > HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.006.patch, HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.007.patch > > > Currently, the rename will fail with FileNotFoundException which is not clear > to the user. > The operation should fail stating the reason is that there are no eligible > destinations. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.2#803003) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-14431) RBF: Rename with multiple subclusters should fail if no eligible locations
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14431?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16850319#comment-16850319 ] xuzq commented on HDFS-14431: - Yes, if we rename one file from /mntsrc to /mntdst, it is ok. But if we rename one directory from /mntsrc to /mntdst, it will be incomplete. Like this: * we will rename the directory from /mntsrc to /mntdst * /mntsrc has file1 in ns1 and has file2 in ns2 * /mntdst mount to ns2 and ns3, but dos't have files. After rename, file2 renamed to /mntdst/file2, but file1 will still in /mntsrc/file1. > RBF: Rename with multiple subclusters should fail if no eligible locations > -- > > Key: HDFS-14431 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14431 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: Sub-task >Reporter: Íñigo Goiri >Assignee: Íñigo Goiri >Priority: Major > Attachments: HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.001.patch, > HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.002.patch, HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.003.patch, > HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.004.patch, HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.005.patch, > HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.006.patch, HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.007.patch > > > Currently, the rename will fail with FileNotFoundException which is not clear > to the user. > The operation should fail stating the reason is that there are no eligible > destinations. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-14431) RBF: Rename with multiple subclusters should fail if no eligible locations
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14431?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16850315#comment-16850315 ] Ayush Saxena commented on HDFS-14431: - May be that would be the last thing to do, if we don't get a good way to handle this, Well I also don't have any good solution to handle. Will try to think, if I get any non hacky solution > RBF: Rename with multiple subclusters should fail if no eligible locations > -- > > Key: HDFS-14431 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14431 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: Sub-task >Reporter: Íñigo Goiri >Assignee: Íñigo Goiri >Priority: Major > Attachments: HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.001.patch, > HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.002.patch, HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.003.patch, > HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.004.patch, HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.005.patch, > HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.006.patch, HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.007.patch > > > Currently, the rename will fail with FileNotFoundException which is not clear > to the user. > The operation should fail stating the reason is that there are no eligible > destinations. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-14431) RBF: Rename with multiple subclusters should fail if no eligible locations
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14431?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16850314#comment-16850314 ] Íñigo Goiri commented on HDFS-14431: In the particular you mentioned before like: * /mntsrc in ns1 and ns2 * /mntdst in ns2 and ns3 If we are renaming a file that is originally in ns1, we will fail (RenameNotAllowedException), but if the file is originally in ns2, we can do the rename, right? Then if the file already exists in ns3, then we fail for the src being in ns1 but delete it from ns3 for the file being in ns2. Does it sound right? > RBF: Rename with multiple subclusters should fail if no eligible locations > -- > > Key: HDFS-14431 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14431 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: Sub-task >Reporter: Íñigo Goiri >Assignee: Íñigo Goiri >Priority: Major > Attachments: HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.001.patch, > HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.002.patch, HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.003.patch, > HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.004.patch, HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.005.patch, > HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.006.patch, HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.007.patch > > > Currently, the rename will fail with FileNotFoundException which is not clear > to the user. > The operation should fail stating the reason is that there are no eligible > destinations. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-14431) RBF: Rename with multiple subclusters should fail if no eligible locations
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14431?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16850311#comment-16850311 ] xuzq commented on HDFS-14431: - Like the above case, may be we can return RenameNotAllowedException. May be we can only support the rename process when the mount points is the same between src and dst. > RBF: Rename with multiple subclusters should fail if no eligible locations > -- > > Key: HDFS-14431 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14431 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: Sub-task >Reporter: Íñigo Goiri >Assignee: Íñigo Goiri >Priority: Major > Attachments: HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.001.patch, > HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.002.patch, HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.003.patch, > HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.004.patch, HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.005.patch, > HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.006.patch, HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.007.patch > > > Currently, the rename will fail with FileNotFoundException which is not clear > to the user. > The operation should fail stating the reason is that there are no eligible > destinations. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-14431) RBF: Rename with multiple subclusters should fail if no eligible locations
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14431?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16849940#comment-16849940 ] Íñigo Goiri commented on HDFS-14431: I have to say I'm stuck with this. I'm covering it in a non-transactional way and it is kind of dangerous... I'll give it a nother tyr this week but started to run out of ideas. > RBF: Rename with multiple subclusters should fail if no eligible locations > -- > > Key: HDFS-14431 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14431 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: Sub-task >Reporter: Íñigo Goiri >Assignee: Íñigo Goiri >Priority: Major > Attachments: HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.001.patch, > HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.002.patch, HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.003.patch, > HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.004.patch, HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.005.patch, > HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.006.patch, HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.007.patch > > > Currently, the rename will fail with FileNotFoundException which is not clear > to the user. > The operation should fail stating the reason is that there are no eligible > destinations. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-14431) RBF: Rename with multiple subclusters should fail if no eligible locations
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14431?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16849784#comment-16849784 ] xuzq commented on HDFS-14431: - Thanx [~elgoiri] for the update. I came across a scenario when rename src to dest but I don't have good solution to fix it , do you have any idea? Like this: * src mount to ns1 and ns2, and both in ns1 and ns2. * dst mount to ns2 and ns3, and both in ns2 and ns3. [^HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.007.patch] will rename src to dst in ns2, and may be delete dst data in ns3 if it support overwrite. But ns1 still have the src file or directory which is renamed successfully. When user get listing the src, there are still have some datas which got from from ns1, it may be stupid. Do you have some ideas to fix it? cc [~ayushtkn] > RBF: Rename with multiple subclusters should fail if no eligible locations > -- > > Key: HDFS-14431 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14431 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: Sub-task >Reporter: Íñigo Goiri >Assignee: Íñigo Goiri >Priority: Major > Attachments: HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.001.patch, > HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.002.patch, HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.003.patch, > HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.004.patch, HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.005.patch, > HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.006.patch, HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.007.patch > > > Currently, the rename will fail with FileNotFoundException which is not clear > to the user. > The operation should fail stating the reason is that there are no eligible > destinations. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-14431) RBF: Rename with multiple subclusters should fail if no eligible locations
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14431?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16843102#comment-16843102 ] Ayush Saxena commented on HDFS-14431: - Thanx [~elgoiri] for the update. Didn't check the entire code, I need to go through it again. bq.HASH needs to have the folders in all subclusters if we need to rename a file. Changed DestinationOrder. Do you intend to change the behavior of HASH order? If so, probably we shouldn't. bq. When renaming with OVERWRITE, we may need to delete the file from another subcluster. This is done in RenameParam#getLocationsToDelete(). Can you explain a bit more, cross cluster rename is not possible I guess. Which scenario it comes in. > RBF: Rename with multiple subclusters should fail if no eligible locations > -- > > Key: HDFS-14431 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14431 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: Sub-task >Reporter: Íñigo Goiri >Assignee: Íñigo Goiri >Priority: Major > Attachments: HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.001.patch, > HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.002.patch, HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.003.patch, > HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.004.patch, HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.005.patch, > HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.006.patch, HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.007.patch > > > Currently, the rename will fail with FileNotFoundException which is not clear > to the user. > The operation should fail stating the reason is that there are no eligible > destinations. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-14431) RBF: Rename with multiple subclusters should fail if no eligible locations
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14431?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16842897#comment-16842897
]
Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-14431:
--
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m
22s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 5 new or modified test
files. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} HDFS-13891 Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 22m
3s{color} | {color:green} HDFS-13891 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m
40s{color} | {color:green} HDFS-13891 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m
28s{color} | {color:green} HDFS-13891 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 0m
41s{color} | {color:green} HDFS-13891 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
14m 1s{color} | {color:green} branch has no errors when building and testing
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 1m
8s{color} | {color:green} HDFS-13891 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
50s{color} | {color:green} HDFS-13891 passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 0m
38s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m
31s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 0m
31s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:orange}-0{color} | {color:orange} checkstyle {color} | {color:orange}
0m 17s{color} | {color:orange} hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs-rbf: The patch
generated 4 new + 7 unchanged - 0 fixed = 11 total (was 7) {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 0m
40s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
13m 18s{color} | {color:green} patch has no errors when building and testing
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 0m
59s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
32s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 24m 13s{color}
| {color:red} hadoop-hdfs-rbf in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green} 0m
28s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black} 82m 59s{color} |
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Reason || Tests ||
| Failed junit tests |
hadoop.hdfs.server.federation.router.TestRouterFaultTolerant |
| | hadoop.hdfs.server.federation.router.TestRouterAdminCLI |
| |
hadoop.hdfs.server.federation.router.TestRouterRPCMultipleDestinationMountTableResolver
|
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker | Client=17.05.0-ce Server=17.05.0-ce Image:yetus/hadoop:bdbca0e |
| JIRA Issue | HDFS-14431 |
| JIRA Patch URL |
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12969060/HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.007.patch
|
| Optional Tests | dupname asflicense compile javac javadoc mvninstall
mvnsite unit shadedclient findbugs checkstyle |
| uname | Linux bcd11fd4adca 3.13.0-153-generic #203-Ubuntu SMP Thu Jun 14
08:52:28 UTC 2018 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality | /testptch/patchprocess/precommit/personality/provided.sh |
| git revision | HDFS-13891 / 09f39bf |
| maven | version: Apache Maven 3.3.9 |
| Default Java | 1.8.0_212 |
| findbugs | v3.1.0-RC1 |
| checkstyle |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/26803/artifact/out/diff-checkstyle-hadoop-hdfs-project_hadoop-hdfs-rbf.txt
|
| unit |
[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-14431) RBF: Rename with multiple subclusters should fail if no eligible locations
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14431?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16842836#comment-16842836
]
Íñigo Goiri commented on HDFS-14431:
The tests are now complete.
There are a couple issues that are solved but open to feedback:
* HASH needs to have the folders in all subclusters if we need to rename a
file. Changed {{DestinationOrder}}.
* When renaming with OVERWRITE, we may need to delete the file from another
subcluster. This is done in {{RenameParam#getLocationsToDelete()}}.
> RBF: Rename with multiple subclusters should fail if no eligible locations
> --
>
> Key: HDFS-14431
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14431
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Sub-task
>Reporter: Íñigo Goiri
>Assignee: Íñigo Goiri
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.001.patch,
> HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.002.patch, HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.003.patch,
> HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.004.patch, HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.005.patch,
> HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.006.patch, HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.007.patch
>
>
> Currently, the rename will fail with FileNotFoundException which is not clear
> to the user.
> The operation should fail stating the reason is that there are no eligible
> destinations.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-14431) RBF: Rename with multiple subclusters should fail if no eligible locations
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14431?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16841744#comment-16841744
]
Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-14431:
--
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m
13s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 5 new or modified test
files. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} HDFS-13891 Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 17m
8s{color} | {color:green} HDFS-13891 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m
28s{color} | {color:green} HDFS-13891 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m
17s{color} | {color:green} HDFS-13891 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 0m
32s{color} | {color:green} HDFS-13891 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
10m 39s{color} | {color:green} branch has no errors when building and testing
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 0m
49s{color} | {color:green} HDFS-13891 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
31s{color} | {color:green} HDFS-13891 passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 0m
25s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m
25s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 0m
25s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:orange}-0{color} | {color:orange} checkstyle {color} | {color:orange}
0m 13s{color} | {color:orange} hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs-rbf: The patch
generated 3 new + 7 unchanged - 0 fixed = 10 total (was 7) {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 0m
26s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
11m 52s{color} | {color:green} patch has no errors when building and testing
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 0m
57s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
27s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 22m 34s{color}
| {color:red} hadoop-hdfs-rbf in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green} 0m
29s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black} 69m 9s{color} |
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Reason || Tests ||
| Failed junit tests | hadoop.hdfs.server.federation.router.TestRouterRename |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker | Client=17.05.0-ce Server=17.05.0-ce Image:yetus/hadoop:bdbca0e |
| JIRA Issue | HDFS-14431 |
| JIRA Patch URL |
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12968958/HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.006.patch
|
| Optional Tests | dupname asflicense compile javac javadoc mvninstall
mvnsite unit shadedclient findbugs checkstyle |
| uname | Linux e521e0b5910d 4.4.0-139-generic #165-Ubuntu SMP Wed Oct 24
10:58:50 UTC 2018 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality | /testptch/patchprocess/precommit/personality/provided.sh |
| git revision | HDFS-13891 / 09f39bf |
| maven | version: Apache Maven 3.3.9 |
| Default Java | 1.8.0_212 |
| findbugs | v3.1.0-RC1 |
| checkstyle |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/26799/artifact/out/diff-checkstyle-hadoop-hdfs-project_hadoop-hdfs-rbf.txt
|
| unit |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/26799/artifact/out/patch-unit-hadoop-hdfs-project_hadoop-hdfs-rbf.txt
|
| Test Results |
[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-14431) RBF: Rename with multiple subclusters should fail if no eligible locations
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14431?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16821635#comment-16821635
]
Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-14431:
--
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m
40s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 5 new or modified test
files. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} HDFS-13891 Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 19m
52s{color} | {color:green} HDFS-13891 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m
32s{color} | {color:green} HDFS-13891 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m
23s{color} | {color:green} HDFS-13891 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 0m
34s{color} | {color:green} HDFS-13891 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
13m 17s{color} | {color:green} branch has no errors when building and testing
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 1m
3s{color} | {color:green} HDFS-13891 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
37s{color} | {color:green} HDFS-13891 passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 0m
31s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m
29s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 0m
29s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:orange}-0{color} | {color:orange} checkstyle {color} | {color:orange}
0m 17s{color} | {color:orange} hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs-rbf: The patch
generated 4 new + 7 unchanged - 0 fixed = 11 total (was 7) {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 0m
30s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
14m 3s{color} | {color:green} patch has no errors when building and testing
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 1m
3s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
35s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 23m 49s{color}
| {color:red} hadoop-hdfs-rbf in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green} 0m
26s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black} 79m 35s{color} |
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Reason || Tests ||
| Failed junit tests | hadoop.hdfs.server.federation.router.TestRouterRename |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker | Client=17.05.0-ce Server=17.05.0-ce Image:yetus/hadoop:8f97d6f |
| JIRA Issue | HDFS-14431 |
| JIRA Patch URL |
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12966428/HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.005.patch
|
| Optional Tests | dupname asflicense compile javac javadoc mvninstall
mvnsite unit shadedclient findbugs checkstyle |
| uname | Linux d14d239f8c7a 3.13.0-153-generic #203-Ubuntu SMP Thu Jun 14
08:52:28 UTC 2018 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality | /testptch/patchprocess/precommit/personality/provided.sh |
| git revision | HDFS-13891 / bd3161e |
| maven | version: Apache Maven 3.3.9 |
| Default Java | 1.8.0_191 |
| findbugs | v3.1.0-RC1 |
| checkstyle |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/26675/artifact/out/diff-checkstyle-hadoop-hdfs-project_hadoop-hdfs-rbf.txt
|
| unit |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/26675/artifact/out/patch-unit-hadoop-hdfs-project_hadoop-hdfs-rbf.txt
|
| Test Results |
[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-14431) RBF: Rename with multiple subclusters should fail if no eligible locations
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14431?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16821614#comment-16821614 ] Íñigo Goiri commented on HDFS-14431: I added some support for overwriting but the cases are a little convoluted. Basically, if we are renaming and the file already exists we have to check the destination. Then, if the file goes to another subcluster, we may end up with the file twice. I need to fix that. I also need to support ParentNotDirectoryException. > RBF: Rename with multiple subclusters should fail if no eligible locations > -- > > Key: HDFS-14431 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14431 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: Sub-task >Reporter: Íñigo Goiri >Assignee: Íñigo Goiri >Priority: Major > Attachments: HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.001.patch, > HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.002.patch, HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.003.patch, > HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.004.patch, HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.005.patch > > > Currently, the rename will fail with FileNotFoundException which is not clear > to the user. > The operation should fail stating the reason is that there are no eligible > destinations. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-14431) RBF: Rename with multiple subclusters should fail if no eligible locations
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14431?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16821374#comment-16821374
]
Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-14431:
--
| (/) *{color:green}+1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m
36s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 5 new or modified test
files. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} HDFS-13891 Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 19m
4s{color} | {color:green} HDFS-13891 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m
39s{color} | {color:green} HDFS-13891 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m
25s{color} | {color:green} HDFS-13891 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 0m
42s{color} | {color:green} HDFS-13891 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
13m 50s{color} | {color:green} branch has no errors when building and testing
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 1m
5s{color} | {color:green} HDFS-13891 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
50s{color} | {color:green} HDFS-13891 passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 0m
37s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m
44s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 0m
44s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m
38s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 0m
39s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
14m 10s{color} | {color:green} patch has no errors when building and testing
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 1m
7s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
39s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 25m
38s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-hdfs-rbf in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green} 0m
31s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black} 82m 56s{color} |
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker | Client=17.05.0-ce Server=17.05.0-ce Image:yetus/hadoop:8f97d6f |
| JIRA Issue | HDFS-14431 |
| JIRA Patch URL |
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12966385/HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.004.patch
|
| Optional Tests | dupname asflicense compile javac javadoc mvninstall
mvnsite unit shadedclient findbugs checkstyle |
| uname | Linux 7fa0b4c2a3c8 3.13.0-153-generic #203-Ubuntu SMP Thu Jun 14
08:52:28 UTC 2018 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality | /testptch/patchprocess/precommit/personality/provided.sh |
| git revision | HDFS-13891 / bd3161e |
| maven | version: Apache Maven 3.3.9 |
| Default Java | 1.8.0_191 |
| findbugs | v3.1.0-RC1 |
| Test Results |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/26669/testReport/ |
| Max. process+thread count | 1035 (vs. ulimit of 1) |
| modules | C: hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs-rbf U:
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs-rbf |
| Console output |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/26669/console |
| Powered by | Apache Yetus 0.8.0 http://yetus.apache.org |
This message was automatically generated.
> RBF: Rename with multiple subclusters should fail if no eligible locations
>
[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-14431) RBF: Rename with multiple subclusters should fail if no eligible locations
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14431?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16821302#comment-16821302
]
Íñigo Goiri commented on HDFS-14431:
Thanks [~ayushtkn] for the comments.
Attached [^HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.004.patch] with the fixes.
Regarding:
{quote}
Why are we holding up the FNF Exception in Rename API and returning false, why
aren't allowing it surface, Was it handled separately somewhere?
{quote}
This is the difference between {{ClientProtocol#rename}} and
{{ClientProtocol#rename2}}.
{code}
/**
* Rename an item in the file system namespace.
* @param src existing file or directory name.
* @param dst new name.
* @return true if successful, or false if the old name does not exist
* or if the new name already belongs to the namespace.
*
* @throws SnapshotAccessControlException if path is in RO snapshot
* @throws IOException an I/O error occurred
*/
@AtMostOnce
boolean rename(String src, String dst) throws IOException;
{code}
So there is no FileNotFoundException meanwhile:
{quote}
/**
* Rename src to dst.
* @throws java.io.FileNotFoundException If src does not exist
* @throws IOException If an I/O error occurred
*/
@AtMostOnce
void rename2(String src, String dst, Options.Rename... options)
throws IOException;
{quote}
Then our internal method gets the FileNotFound from checking the getFileInfo so
we need to return false and not an exception.
The part we are not covering is when the destination exists.
Let me add some there too.
> RBF: Rename with multiple subclusters should fail if no eligible locations
> --
>
> Key: HDFS-14431
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14431
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Sub-task
>Reporter: Íñigo Goiri
>Assignee: Íñigo Goiri
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.001.patch,
> HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.002.patch, HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.003.patch,
> HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.004.patch
>
>
> Currently, the rename will fail with FileNotFoundException which is not clear
> to the user.
> The operation should fail stating the reason is that there are no eligible
> destinations.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-14431) RBF: Rename with multiple subclusters should fail if no eligible locations
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14431?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16820994#comment-16820994
]
Ayush Saxena commented on HDFS-14431:
-
Thanx [~elgoiri] for the patch. I guess this the first approach we discussed at
HDFS-14117.
Overall functionality, seems fair.
* One minor stuff : can we change this name from
\{{NotAllowedRenameException}} to \{{RenameNotAllowedException}} . Usually in
exception names the action comes after FileNotFound, here NotFound is After.
DSQuotaExceededException here Exceeded is after.
* Secondly, Why are we holding up the FNF Exception in Rename API and
returning false, why aren't allowing it surface, Was it handled separately
somewhere?
* Rename.NONE can be used instead typecasting null to rename options.
> RBF: Rename with multiple subclusters should fail if no eligible locations
> --
>
> Key: HDFS-14431
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14431
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Sub-task
>Reporter: Íñigo Goiri
>Assignee: Íñigo Goiri
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.001.patch,
> HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.002.patch, HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.003.patch
>
>
> Currently, the rename will fail with FileNotFoundException which is not clear
> to the user.
> The operation should fail stating the reason is that there are no eligible
> destinations.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-14431) RBF: Rename with multiple subclusters should fail if no eligible locations
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14431?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16820361#comment-16820361
]
Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-14431:
--
| (/) *{color:green}+1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m
41s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 5 new or modified test
files. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} HDFS-13891 Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 22m
33s{color} | {color:green} HDFS-13891 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m
36s{color} | {color:green} HDFS-13891 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m
25s{color} | {color:green} HDFS-13891 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 0m
38s{color} | {color:green} HDFS-13891 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
13m 44s{color} | {color:green} branch has no errors when building and testing
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 1m
5s{color} | {color:green} HDFS-13891 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
42s{color} | {color:green} HDFS-13891 passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 0m
39s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m
32s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 0m
32s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m
21s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 0m
35s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
14m 18s{color} | {color:green} patch has no errors when building and testing
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 1m
6s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
37s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 26m
21s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-hdfs-rbf in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green} 0m
31s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black} 86m 29s{color} |
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker | Client=17.05.0-ce Server=17.05.0-ce Image:yetus/hadoop:8f97d6f |
| JIRA Issue | HDFS-14431 |
| JIRA Patch URL |
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12966257/HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.003.patch
|
| Optional Tests | dupname asflicense compile javac javadoc mvninstall
mvnsite unit shadedclient findbugs checkstyle |
| uname | Linux c6d52b4f9db1 3.13.0-153-generic #203-Ubuntu SMP Thu Jun 14
08:52:28 UTC 2018 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality | /testptch/patchprocess/precommit/personality/provided.sh |
| git revision | HDFS-13891 / bd3161e |
| maven | version: Apache Maven 3.3.9 |
| Default Java | 1.8.0_191 |
| findbugs | v3.1.0-RC1 |
| Test Results |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/26658/testReport/ |
| Max. process+thread count | 1027 (vs. ulimit of 1) |
| modules | C: hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs-rbf U:
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs-rbf |
| Console output |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/26658/console |
| Powered by | Apache Yetus 0.8.0 http://yetus.apache.org |
This message was automatically generated.
> RBF: Rename with multiple subclusters should fail if no eligible locations
>
[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-14431) RBF: Rename with multiple subclusters should fail if no eligible locations
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14431?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16820271#comment-16820271 ] Íñigo Goiri commented on HDFS-14431: Following the discussion in HDFS-14117, this just tackles the rename operation. It basically unifies the experience and throws an intuitive error when a rename is not possible. The approach is the one described there: (1) check the source files and (2) rename only the ones that are possible. [^HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.003.patch] should be ready for review. > RBF: Rename with multiple subclusters should fail if no eligible locations > -- > > Key: HDFS-14431 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14431 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: Sub-task >Reporter: Íñigo Goiri >Assignee: Íñigo Goiri >Priority: Major > Attachments: HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.001.patch, > HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.002.patch, HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.003.patch > > > Currently, the rename will fail with FileNotFoundException which is not clear > to the user. > The operation should fail stating the reason is that there are no eligible > destinations. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-14431) RBF: Rename with multiple subclusters should fail if no eligible locations
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14431?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16819692#comment-16819692
]
Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-14431:
--
| (/) *{color:green}+1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m
16s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 5 new or modified test
files. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} HDFS-13891 Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 18m
3s{color} | {color:green} HDFS-13891 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m
30s{color} | {color:green} HDFS-13891 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m
23s{color} | {color:green} HDFS-13891 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 0m
30s{color} | {color:green} HDFS-13891 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
11m 4s{color} | {color:green} branch has no errors when building and testing
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 0m
56s{color} | {color:green} HDFS-13891 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
36s{color} | {color:green} HDFS-13891 passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 0m
28s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m
26s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 0m
26s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:orange}-0{color} | {color:orange} checkstyle {color} | {color:orange}
0m 17s{color} | {color:orange} hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs-rbf: The patch
generated 2 new + 7 unchanged - 0 fixed = 9 total (was 7) {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 0m
29s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
12m 5s{color} | {color:green} patch has no errors when building and testing
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 0m
57s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
34s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 23m
4s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-hdfs-rbf in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green} 0m
27s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black} 72m 1s{color} |
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker | Client=17.05.0-ce Server=17.05.0-ce Image:yetus/hadoop:8f97d6f |
| JIRA Issue | HDFS-14431 |
| JIRA Patch URL |
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12966174/HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.002.patch
|
| Optional Tests | dupname asflicense compile javac javadoc mvninstall
mvnsite unit shadedclient findbugs checkstyle |
| uname | Linux a0e604e71547 4.4.0-139-generic #165-Ubuntu SMP Wed Oct 24
10:58:50 UTC 2018 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality | /testptch/patchprocess/precommit/personality/provided.sh |
| git revision | HDFS-13891 / bd3161e |
| maven | version: Apache Maven 3.3.9 |
| Default Java | 1.8.0_191 |
| findbugs | v3.1.0-RC1 |
| checkstyle |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/26654/artifact/out/diff-checkstyle-hadoop-hdfs-project_hadoop-hdfs-rbf.txt
|
| Test Results |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/26654/testReport/ |
| Max. process+thread count | 1359 (vs. ulimit of 1) |
| modules | C: hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs-rbf U:
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs-rbf |
| Console output |
[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-14431) RBF: Rename with multiple subclusters should fail if no eligible locations
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14431?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16819681#comment-16819681
]
Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-14431:
--
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m
15s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 5 new or modified test
files. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} HDFS-13891 Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 17m
10s{color} | {color:green} HDFS-13891 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m
32s{color} | {color:green} HDFS-13891 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m
24s{color} | {color:green} HDFS-13891 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 0m
36s{color} | {color:green} HDFS-13891 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
12m 5s{color} | {color:green} branch has no errors when building and testing
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 0m
53s{color} | {color:green} HDFS-13891 passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
37s{color} | {color:green} HDFS-13891 passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 0m
28s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 0m
25s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 0m
25s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:orange}-0{color} | {color:orange} checkstyle {color} | {color:orange}
0m 18s{color} | {color:orange} hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs-rbf: The patch
generated 4 new + 7 unchanged - 0 fixed = 11 total (was 7) {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 0m
29s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
12m 8s{color} | {color:green} patch has no errors when building and testing
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 0m
57s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
34s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 21m 39s{color}
| {color:red} hadoop-hdfs-rbf in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green} 0m
21s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black} 70m 39s{color} |
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Reason || Tests ||
| Failed junit tests | hadoop.hdfs.server.federation.router.TestRouterRpc |
| | hadoop.hdfs.server.federation.router.TestRouterWithSecureStartup |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker | Client=17.05.0-ce Server=17.05.0-ce Image:yetus/hadoop:8f97d6f |
| JIRA Issue | HDFS-14431 |
| JIRA Patch URL |
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12966167/HDFS-14431-HDFS-13891.001.patch
|
| Optional Tests | dupname asflicense compile javac javadoc mvninstall
mvnsite unit shadedclient findbugs checkstyle |
| uname | Linux 99fa592af680 4.4.0-139-generic #165-Ubuntu SMP Wed Oct 24
10:58:50 UTC 2018 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality | /testptch/patchprocess/precommit/personality/provided.sh |
| git revision | HDFS-13891 / bd3161e |
| maven | version: Apache Maven 3.3.9 |
| Default Java | 1.8.0_191 |
| findbugs | v3.1.0-RC1 |
| checkstyle |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/26653/artifact/out/diff-checkstyle-hadoop-hdfs-project_hadoop-hdfs-rbf.txt
|
| unit |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/26653/artifact/out/patch-unit-hadoop-hdfs-project_hadoop-hdfs-rbf.txt
|
| Test
