Re: [ANN] Emacs-Guix 0.4
myg...@gmail.com (2018-05-24 21:02 -0400) wrote: > Hi Alex, > > Thank you for this new release. I am enjoying the cool new features! > > On 05/24/2018 at 20:21 Alex Kost writes: > > [...] > >> I recalled that C-u prefix is already occupied by specifying an >> arbitrary profile for the package commands. So, I'm afraid instead of >> "C-u M-x guix-dependent-packages" there will be "M-x >> guix-direct-dependent-packages". >> >> Or maybe I should just break this dull "convention" (I mean "C-u" for >> profiles) as probably no one uses it anyway :-) > > +1 > > FWIW, ISTM this use of "C-u" is more global than typical and thus feels > a bit counter-intuitive. Since you have made it very easy to jump > between profiles in *Guix Profiles* I think it would be good to switch > to using "C-u" for more command-specific modifications. This might also > help avoid "function bloat in emacs-guix." I agree. Although I decided to make another solution for this case: "M-x guix-dependent-packages" will ask you for the "dependent type" in the minibuffer: "all" (default) or "direct". -- Alex
Re: [ANN] Emacs-Guix 0.4
Hi Alex, Thank you for this new release. I am enjoying the cool new features! On 05/24/2018 at 20:21 Alex Kost writes: [...] > I recalled that C-u prefix is already occupied by specifying an > arbitrary profile for the package commands. So, I'm afraid instead of > "C-u M-x guix-dependent-packages" there will be "M-x > guix-direct-dependent-packages". > > Or maybe I should just break this dull "convention" (I mean "C-u" for > profiles) as probably no one uses it anyway :-) +1 FWIW, ISTM this use of "C-u" is more global than typical and thus feels a bit counter-intuitive. Since you have made it very easy to jump between profiles in *Guix Profiles* I think it would be good to switch to using "C-u" for more command-specific modifications. This might also help avoid "function bloat in emacs-guix." HTH - George
Re: [ANN] Emacs-Guix 0.4
Ludovic Courtès (2018-05-24 14:16 +0200) wrote: > Hello! > > Alex Kost skribis: > >> Ludovic Courtès (2018-05-23 17:30 +0200) wrote: > > [...] > >>> I think ‘guix-dependent-packages’ is going to be very useful. I wonder >>> if we could have ‘C-u guix-dependent-packages’ list only packages that >>> are direct dependents? That would be helpful in some situations. >> >> I agree! Is there a shell command for this? I mean I'd like to know >> what Guile code can do this :-) > > No, there’s no such command. Perhaps something to add to ‘guix refresh > -l’, say ‘guix refresh -l direct’? It would be good! >> Currently, the following code is used to get dependent packages: >> >> (with-store store >> (run-with-store store >> (mlet %store-monad ((edges (node-back-edges %bag-node-type >> (all-packages >> (return (node-transitive-edges packages edges) > > ‘node-transitive-edges’ traverses the whole DAG, so you should simply > call ‘edges’ instead. > > HTH! Yes, now it's clear, thanks! I recalled that C-u prefix is already occupied by specifying an arbitrary profile for the package commands. So, I'm afraid instead of "C-u M-x guix-dependent-packages" there will be "M-x guix-direct-dependent-packages". Or maybe I should just break this dull "convention" (I mean "C-u" for profiles) as probably no one uses it anyway :-) -- Alex
Re: [ANN] Emacs-Guix 0.4
Hello! Alex Kost skribis: > Ludovic Courtès (2018-05-23 17:30 +0200) wrote: [...] >> I think ‘guix-dependent-packages’ is going to be very useful. I wonder >> if we could have ‘C-u guix-dependent-packages’ list only packages that >> are direct dependents? That would be helpful in some situations. > > I agree! Is there a shell command for this? I mean I'd like to know > what Guile code can do this :-) No, there’s no such command. Perhaps something to add to ‘guix refresh -l’, say ‘guix refresh -l direct’? > Currently, the following code is used to get dependent packages: > > (with-store store > (run-with-store store > (mlet %store-monad ((edges (node-back-edges %bag-node-type > (all-packages > (return (node-transitive-edges packages edges) ‘node-transitive-edges’ traverses the whole DAG, so you should simply call ‘edges’ instead. HTH! Ludo’.
Re: [ANN] Emacs-Guix 0.4
Ludovic Courtès (2018-05-23 17:30 +0200) wrote: > Hello! > > Maxim Cournoyer skribis: > >> Alex Kost writes: >> >>> Hello, Emacs-Guix (Emacs interface for GNU Guix) version 0.4 has been >>> released. If you are not familiar with it yet, you may start with: >>> ‘guix package -i emacs-guix’ and "M-x guix-about". >> >> Just wanted to say thank you for this new feature packed release! I look >> forward to trying it out :) > > +1 I just tried it out and these new features are awesome, as usual! > > ‘guix-all-services’ is very cool! (It shows that we lack descriptions > for roughly a third of the services; if you’re reading along, consider > helping out. :-)) > > I think ‘guix-dependent-packages’ is going to be very useful. I wonder > if we could have ‘C-u guix-dependent-packages’ list only packages that > are direct dependents? That would be helpful in some situations. I agree! Is there a shell command for this? I mean I'd like to know what Guile code can do this :-) Currently, the following code is used to get dependent packages: (with-store store (run-with-store store (mlet %store-monad ((edges (node-back-edges %bag-node-type (all-packages (return (node-transitive-edges packages edges) -- Alex
Re: [ANN] Emacs-Guix 0.4
Hello! Maxim Cournoyer skribis: > Alex Kost writes: > >> Hello, Emacs-Guix (Emacs interface for GNU Guix) version 0.4 has been >> released. If you are not familiar with it yet, you may start with: >> ‘guix package -i emacs-guix’ and "M-x guix-about". > > Just wanted to say thank you for this new feature packed release! I look > forward to trying it out :) +1 I just tried it out and these new features are awesome, as usual! ‘guix-all-services’ is very cool! (It shows that we lack descriptions for roughly a third of the services; if you’re reading along, consider helping out. :-)) I think ‘guix-dependent-packages’ is going to be very useful. I wonder if we could have ‘C-u guix-dependent-packages’ list only packages that are direct dependents? That would be helpful in some situations. Thank you! Ludo’.
Re: [ANN] Emacs-Guix 0.4
Hi Alex, Alex Kost writes: > Hello, Emacs-Guix (Emacs interface for GNU Guix) version 0.4 has been > released. If you are not familiar with it yet, you may start with: > ‘guix package -i emacs-guix’ and "M-x guix-about". Just wanted to say thank you for this new feature packed release! I look forward to trying it out :) Maxim
