[Histonet] Affordable microtome knife reconditioning in the EC?

2009-04-21 Thread yvan lindekens

Hi all,

I have some large (25 - 30cm) type B, C and D, both steel and tungsten carbide, 
microtome knives that need sharpening and/or reconditioning.

Does anyone knows a company in Europe (preferably within the EC) that does that 
kind of work at an affordable price? 

By the way: what is a *normal* price for those things? Impossible to answer 
question, I suppose...

Thanks in advance!

Yvan.


  

___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


[Histonet] Replacement glass plates for Reichert Microtome Knife Sharpener 903?

2009-04-21 Thread yvan lindekens

Hi all,

It struck me that all those microtome knife sharpeners (AO 935, Reichert 903, 
AO 903...) all look very much the same. Are the glass plates interchangeable?

Would the glass plates for the current Leica sharpener SP9000 (part.no. 
14041819698, dimensions 292mm x 127mm x 6 mm) fit the Reichert Microtome Knife 
Sharpener 903?

Thanks in advance for your answers!

Yvan.


  

___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


Re: [Histonet] Affordable microtome knife reconditioning in the EC?

2009-04-21 Thread Jack Ratliff
I don't know about Europe, but here in the US there are a few vendors  
that provide these services (Dorn and Hart Microedge, Sturkey, and  
Delaware Diamond Knives). I am not sure of the pricing for all three  
of these vendors, but for the past 11 years I have sent my D-profile  
rotary wedge and sledge/polycut tungsten-carbide knives for re- 
sharpening services to Dorn and Hart Microedge. They are located near  
Chicago, Illinois and their prices are very reasonable. Maybe you can  
google all three vendors for information if you get in a bind, but I  
am pretty sure they provide services outside the US.


Jack



On Apr 21, 2009, at 5:14 AM, yvan lindekens yvan_lindek...@yahoo.com  
wrote:




Hi all,

I have some large (25 - 30cm) type B, C and D, both steel and  
tungsten carbide, microtome knives that need sharpening and/or  
reconditioning.


Does anyone knows a company in Europe (preferably within the EC)  
that does that kind of work at an affordable price?


By the way: what is a *normal* price for those things? Impossible to  
answer question, I suppose...


Thanks in advance!

Yvan.




___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet



___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


[Histonet] melanoma markers on mouse

2009-04-21 Thread Perry, Samuel
Hi All,

I am trying to perform IHC for melanoma markers on mouse tissue.  In particular,
does anyone have hands-on experience with antibodies against Pmel17/Silv/gp100
(recognized by HMB-45 antibody in humans), Melan-A/MART-1, or MITF on mouse?

Thanks 

Sam Perry

 

Research Technician

DFCI, Boston MA



The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.
___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


Re: [Histonet] Cloudy MMA embedded block

2009-04-21 Thread Jack Ratliff

Ooi,

Somehow you are getting moisture/water mixed in with the MMA  
solution(s). I only remember visiting the IMCB facility, so if this is  
not your facility then I am not sure of your laboratory environment  
(air temperature/humidity). The best thing I can tell you at this  
point is to try and find ways to reduce the chance for moisture  
accumulation.


I am pretty sure that at a minimum you are storing your catalyst and  
monomer (MMA) at 4C and your softner (DBP) at room temp. Maybe you  
should take extra steps to ensure your chemicals are at room temp  
before any use. Lastly, your polymerization is taking too long for  
your small 20mL vials. My specimens of similar size require only 3-5  
days to completely polymerize. Now, I dont remember your concentration  
of catalyst, but if it is around 2.5g/1L embedding solution, try  
skipping the 4C step and use room temp (23C) until the specimens are  
polymerized. Then finish them off in the oven when they are tacky or  
mostly hard on top. The 4C step is mostly to slow the polymerization  
for larger specimens requiring a larger volume of solution and/or when  
the lab temp cannot be controlled routinely at or below 23C. The water  
bath then also helps to regulate the temperature of the polymerization  
in the case where the lab environment is too cool (20C) and retarding  
the rate of polymerzation.


The main thing to keep in mind is that the lab environment pretty much  
controls the process and is probably the main variable that will  
contrast labs that perform the exact same method.


Jack



On Apr 21, 2009, at 12:33 AM, ooi.ting.h...@nhc.com.sg wrote:


Hi,

I am trying very hard to get a clear MMA embedded block. I am  
appreciate
if there is any advice on doing it. I am using 100% MMA (liquid) and  
0.5%
Perkadox 16 (powder) to do the embedding. I have tried to embed the  
sample
in different conditions. However, it seems to be extremely hard to  
get a

clear embedded block.

Below are the methods that I have tried.

1. Before embedding, bring the MMA and perkadox 16 to room  
temperature.
After a few mix it by invertion, I aliquot the solution to the glass  
vials
that contain samples or simply glass vials that without sample. I  
put the
glass vials (both with and without sample) in 4 degree, room  
temperature

and even 37degree oven.

2. Mix the MMA and perkadox when it is cold, invert it a few times.
Aliquot it to glass vials that contain sample or without sample. Put  
in

4degree, room temperature and 37degree oven.

I have also tried to speed up the polymerization process by using  
vacumm

for a few samples...

Throughout all the sample that I have, I only manage to get a clear  
empty
glass vial which I put in the 4degree for one month and a clear  
embedded

sample which I put in 4 degree overnight and bring it out to room
temperature. The rest of the glass vials (with or without sample) are
cloudy.

I have repeated the methods that I used to get a clear embedded  
block, I

did not get any clear block (for both with and without sample).

I am glad if there is any expert advice or guidance. We need a clear
embedded sample. Thank you very much!



Regards,
Ooi
_
Confidential information. Unauthorized use or disclosure prohibited.
Refer http://www.singhealth.com.sg/ContactUs/#Disclaimer
___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet



___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


Re: [Histonet] Cloudy MMA embedded block

2009-04-21 Thread Pamela Marcum


Hi, 



We don't store our MMA or DBP in the refirgerator as the movement between 4C 
and room temperature can cause condensation in the bottles.  This just adds 
water to the material and as it is cooled and re-warmed you are adding more 
each time and in both directions.   When it comes to room temperature and then 
is replaced in the refrigerator it again will develop condensation.  Over time 
the MMA will have enough water in it to become discolored.  I am surprised you 
are not seeing the discoloration in the MMA liquid as it poured as a warning 
not to use it.  



We have fair control of temperature in the laboratory and are generally between 
68F to 75F with the average as around 70F.  We have never had a problem with 
the MMA polymerizing or developing a water content.  It is stored in a dark 
cabinet that is in an area I would say is a little cooler than the room.  We 
generally don't polymerize in the cold at 4C however, you timing seems long for 
the process.  It is best not to disturb the vials too much once you are in the 
embedding phase.  Movement or inversion of the vials can cause a problem as the 
MMA will polymerize from the bottom up and remixing it can slow the process.  
Also make sure you tops are tight at this step. 



Pam Marcum 

UPENN Vet Sch 

New Botlon Center 



- Original Message - 
From: Jack Ratliff ratliffj...@hotmail.com 
To: Ooi Ting Huay ooi.ting.h...@nhc.com.sg, 
histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu 
histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu 
Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2009 9:24:29 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
Subject: Re: [Histonet] Cloudy MMA embedded block 

Ooi, 

Somehow you are getting moisture/water mixed in with the MMA   
solution(s). I only remember visiting the IMCB facility, so if this is   
not your facility then I am not sure of your laboratory environment   
(air temperature/humidity). The best thing I can tell you at this   
point is to try and find ways to reduce the chance for moisture   
accumulation. 

I am pretty sure that at a minimum you are storing your catalyst and   
monomer (MMA) at 4C and your softner (DBP) at room temp. Maybe you   
should take extra steps to ensure your chemicals are at room temp   
before any use. Lastly, your polymerization is taking too long for   
your small 20mL vials. My specimens of similar size require only 3-5   
days to completely polymerize. Now, I dont remember your concentration   
of catalyst, but if it is around 2.5g/1L embedding solution, try   
skipping the 4C step and use room temp (23C) until the specimens are   
polymerized. Then finish them off in the oven when they are tacky or   
mostly hard on top. The 4C step is mostly to slow the polymerization   
for larger specimens requiring a larger volume of solution and/or when   
the lab temp cannot be controlled routinely at or below 23C. The water   
bath then also helps to regulate the temperature of the polymerization   
in the case where the lab environment is too cool (20C) and retarding   
the rate of polymerzation. 

The main thing to keep in mind is that the lab environment pretty much   
controls the process and is probably the main variable that will   
contrast labs that perform the exact same method. 

Jack 



On Apr 21, 2009, at 12:33 AM, ooi.ting.h...@nhc.com.sg wrote: 

 Hi, 
 
 I am trying very hard to get a clear MMA embedded block. I am   
 appreciate 
 if there is any advice on doing it. I am using 100% MMA (liquid) and   
 0.5% 
 Perkadox 16 (powder) to do the embedding. I have tried to embed the   
 sample 
 in different conditions. However, it seems to be extremely hard to   
 get a 
 clear embedded block. 
 
 Below are the methods that I have tried. 
 
 1. Before embedding, bring the MMA and perkadox 16 to room   
 temperature. 
 After a few mix it by invertion, I aliquot the solution to the glass   
 vials 
 that contain samples or simply glass vials that without sample. I   
 put the 
 glass vials (both with and without sample) in 4 degree, room   
 temperature 
 and even 37degree oven. 
 
 2. Mix the MMA and perkadox when it is cold, invert it a few times. 
 Aliquot it to glass vials that contain sample or without sample. Put   
 in 
 4degree, room temperature and 37degree oven. 
 
 I have also tried to speed up the polymerization process by using   
 vacumm 
 for a few samples... 
 
 Throughout all the sample that I have, I only manage to get a clear   
 empty 
 glass vial which I put in the 4degree for one month and a clear   
 embedded 
 sample which I put in 4 degree overnight and bring it out to room 
 temperature. The rest of the glass vials (with or without sample) are 
 cloudy. 
 
 I have repeated the methods that I used to get a clear embedded   
 block, I 
 did not get any clear block (for both with and without sample). 
 
 I am glad if there is any expert advice or guidance. We need a clear 
 embedded sample. Thank you very much! 
 
 
 
 Regards, 
 Ooi 
 

[Histonet] rulers

2009-04-21 Thread Putnam, Jodi
Thanks to everyone that has given me feedback on the prostate situation. I am 
testing a shorter run today and will hope that solves the issue.
 
I was wondering if anyone (vendors included) knew of anywhere I could get some 
of the cheap plastic rulers (the kind they give away usually) that are 
flexible. I use them to measure my skin lesions and I had a few that seem to 
have walked away. I am using my scalpel handle currently to measure (in cm) but 
would really love some of the plastic ones. Thanks and have a great day.
 
Jodi
 
Jodi Putnam (HT,ASCP)
Graves Gilbert Clinic
Pathology Department
201 Park Street
Bowling Green, KY 42102
(270) 393-2728 (voicemail)
(270) 393-2795 
Fax : (270) 393-2736
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom
they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error please notify the
originator of the message. This footer also confirms that this
email message has been scanned for the presence of computer viruses.

Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual
sender, except where the sender specifies and with authority,
states them to be the views of Graves-Gilbert Clinic.

Scanning of this message and addition of this footer is performed
by Websense Email Security software in conjunction with 
virus detection software.



___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


[Histonet] Vectashield mounting media problem?

2009-04-21 Thread Suhyoung Jeong
Hello everyone,

Our lab has been using 'Vectashield mounting media w/ DAPI' for many years
and had no problem of fading. Recently, two bottles with different lot
numbers in a row gone bad in around four months (the signal disappears in
front of your eyes, tested on a couple of different microscopes).

1) Has anyone experienced same problem? Vector lab only says that this is a
very stable product and should not be happening when stored at 4C.

2) Can anyone recommend a good aqueous mounting media with DAPI for
immunofluorescence?

Thank you in advance,

Regards, Suh
___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


RE: [Histonet] Vectashield mounting media problem?

2009-04-21 Thread Montina Van Meter
ProLong Gold w/ DAPI  (Invitrogen/Molecular Probes)

This is a permanent mounting media - works great!




Montina J. Van Meter, HT (ASCP)
Lab Manager
Autonomic Neuroscience
Pennington Biomedical Research Center
6400 Perkins Rd.
Baton Rouge, LA  70791
225-763-2564

-Original Message-
From: histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
[mailto:histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of Suhyoung
Jeong
Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2009 9:52 AM
To: histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: [Histonet] Vectashield mounting media problem?

Hello everyone,

Our lab has been using 'Vectashield mounting media w/ DAPI' for many
years
and had no problem of fading. Recently, two bottles with different lot
numbers in a row gone bad in around four months (the signal disappears
in
front of your eyes, tested on a couple of different microscopes).

1) Has anyone experienced same problem? Vector lab only says that this
is a
very stable product and should not be happening when stored at 4C.

2) Can anyone recommend a good aqueous mounting media with DAPI for
immunofluorescence?

Thank you in advance,

Regards, Suh
___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet

___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


Re: [Histonet] Vectashield mounting media problem?

2009-04-21 Thread Merced Leiker
We had the EXACT same problem about a year ago! We don't believe we had 
storage issues, either.  We've been using SlowFade Gold (Molecular Probes, 
Invitrogen) for about a year now and it's been a great aqueous mounting 
medium.  We add our own DAPI (2ul of a 1mg/ml DAPI solution per 500ul 
SlowFade) and it works fine.


Merced

--On Tuesday, April 21, 2009 10:51 AM -0400 Suhyoung Jeong 
suhyoung.je...@gmail.com wrote:



Hello everyone,

Our lab has been using 'Vectashield mounting media w/ DAPI' for many years
and had no problem of fading. Recently, two bottles with different lot
numbers in a row gone bad in around four months (the signal disappears in
front of your eyes, tested on a couple of different microscopes).

1) Has anyone experienced same problem? Vector lab only says that this is
a very stable product and should not be happening when stored at 4C.

2) Can anyone recommend a good aqueous mounting media with DAPI for
immunofluorescence?

Thank you in advance,

Regards, Suh
___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet





Merced M Leiker
Research Technician II
354 Biomedical Research Building
School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences
State University of New York at Buffalo
3435 Main St, Buffalo, NY 14214
Ph: (716) 829-6033
Fx: (716) 829-2725

No trees were harmed in the sending of this email.
However, many electrons were severely inconvenienced.


___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


[Histonet] Reminder - California Society for Histotechnology Annual Symposium

2009-04-21 Thread Chu, Shirley
Just a reminder, registration deadline for the upcoming California
Society for Histotechnology Annual Symposium/Convention is May 1st.
This is a 3.5 day education forum on May 14-17 and will be held at the
Westin San Francisco Airport.  For further information, please see our
website at:  www.californiahistology.org or contact:  Shirley Chu at
408-747-3765 or by email at: shirley@moldev.com.  Cut-off date for
hotel registration is April 22nd (online hotel registration:
http://www.starwoodmeeting.com/StarGroupsWeb/res?id=0806209635key=F3921
) 

 

Shirley Chu

Application Scientist, Arcturus LCM Products

Molecular Devices

(now a part of MDS Analytical Technologies)

408-747-3765 | www.moleculardevices.com

 

This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged
and/or confidential information and may be read or used only by the
intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient of the e-mail or
any of its attachments, please be advised that you have received this
e-mail in error and any use, dissemination, distribution, forwarding,
printing or copying of this e-mail or any attached files is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please
immediately purge it and all attachments and notify the sender by
reply e-mail or contact the sender at the number listed.

___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


RE: [Histonet] Peloris Tissue Processor

2009-04-21 Thread Joyce Cline
You cannot use recycled Formula 83 in the Peloris. The threshold is 88%.



-Original Message-
From: histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
[mailto:histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of
thisis...@aol.com
Sent: Monday, April 20, 2009 10:17 PM
To: histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: [Histonet] Peloris Tissue Processor

Does anyone use recycled and/or fresh Formula 83 as a clearant on their
Peloris Tissue Processor?? If so, can you tell me what final threshold
percentage you use.
Thanks,
Ann
___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


* CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE *
This message contains confidential information and is intended only for
the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not
disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender
immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and
delete this e-mail from your system.


___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


[Histonet] Reusing specimen containers

2009-04-21 Thread Kelly Colpitts

Hi Histoland!

 

I'm just wondering what folks out there are doing about specimen containers.  
Is anyone cleaning them out and reusing them?  Is there any CAP or Joint 
Commission regulations that say that all specimen containers can only be used 
once or can you reuse them as long as they have been thoroughly cleaned?  

 

Thanks for you all your input,

Kelly

_
Windows Live™ SkyDrive™: Get 25 GB of free online storage.  
http://windowslive.com/online/skydrive?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_skydrive_042009___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


RE: [Histonet] Peloris Tissue Processor

2009-04-21 Thread Jim . Chalmers
Hello Joyce,

Thank you for addressing this.

You are correct, it is not recommended to use recycled clearing reagents on
the Peloris; recycled alcohol is the only recycled reagent acceptable for
use on Peloris.

Kindest regards,

James Chalmers, MLT (ASCP), MT (HHS)
Applications Specialist/Trainer
Leica Microsystems - Biosystems Division

2345 Waukegan Road
Bannockburn, IL 60015

Phone: (847)405-5431
Fax:  (847)405-7945


   
 Joyce Cline 
 jcl...@wchsys.or 
 g To 
 Sent by:  Histonet  
 histonet-bounces@ histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu 
 lists.utsouthwest  cc 
 ern.edu   
   Subject 
   RE: [Histonet] Peloris Tissue   
 04/21/2009 11:32  Processor   
 AM
   
   
   
   
   




You cannot use recycled Formula 83 in the Peloris. The threshold is 88%.



-Original Message-
From: histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
[mailto:histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of
thisis...@aol.com
Sent: Monday, April 20, 2009 10:17 PM
To: histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: [Histonet] Peloris Tissue Processor

Does anyone use recycled and/or fresh Formula 83 as a clearant on their
Peloris Tissue Processor?? If so, can you tell me what final threshold
percentage you use.
Thanks,
Ann
___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


* CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE *
This message contains confidential information and is intended only for
the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not
disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender
immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and
delete this e-mail from your system.


___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet



__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
__

___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


[Histonet] BRDU, Tetracycline, calcein in bone

2009-04-21 Thread Nancy W. Troiano
I would recommend fixing the bones in 70% ethanol, embedding in 
methylmethacrylate undecalcified and cutting 8 - 10 micron thick sections 
for visualization of tetracycline and/or calcein labels.   Decalcification 
will remove fluorescent labels bound to the mineral in bone as mineral is 
removed by decal procedures.  You may need a larger microtome (Polycut) to 
cut these bones depending on the size.  The fluorescent labels in 
combination with a nice von Kossa stain would certainly show formation/ 
mineralization of bone in this area which you can quantify using an 
Osteomeasure or other system, however, you may want to do a few in paraffin 
for optimal BRDU label preservation.  I would recommend a slow embedding 
method for these bones - you can check our article in the JOH, June 2004, 
Vol. 27(2) pp119-130 which describes our slow embedding method for rat 
bones which can be adapted for rabbit bones.  You can contact me for 
suggestions and with questions if you would like to. 



___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


Re: [Histonet] Beta F1 antibody

2009-04-21 Thread Joanne Mauger
Martha,

I think you want the TCR-BF1 antibody. It is a T cell recptor for Beta F1. We 
get it from Pierce (Endogen), cat# TCR1151. We run it on the Bondmax and it 
works well.

Jo Mauger

 Martha Ward mw...@wfubmc.edu 04/21/09 12:52 PM 
I have had a request for this antibody and have had some difficulty
locating a vendor for it.  We will be using the Leica Bond Max and if
anyone has any tips, vendor, etc.  I would appreciate some advice.
 
Thanks in advance for your help.
 
Martha Ward, MT (ASCP) QIHC
Molecular Diagnostics Lab
Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center
Winston-Salem, NC
___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu 
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet



___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


RE: [Histonet] Cloudy MMA embedded block

2009-04-21 Thread Garcia, Lori, Sr. Scientist

 In our lab we do store our MMA solutions in a flammable storage refrigerator 
per EHS requirements; however we put Molecular Sieves in all solutions to keep 
moisture from contaminating them. We rarely have any problems with cloudy 
blocks. We order them from VWR, catalog # JT2708-1, 500 g, ~$40 each; 
manufacturer is J.T. Baker. They last a very long time and are useful for any 
open non-aqueous solution. Just add a few (6-12) to each container.

Hope this helps!
Lori



-Original Message-
From: histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu 
[mailto:histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of Pamela Marcum
Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2009 6:45 AM
To: Jack Ratliff
Cc: histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: Re: [Histonet] Cloudy MMA embedded block



Hi,



We don't store our MMA or DBP in the refirgerator as the movement between 4C 
and room temperature can cause condensation in the bottles.  This just adds 
water to the material and as it is cooled and re-warmed you are adding more 
each time and in both directions.   When it comes to room temperature and then 
is replaced in the refrigerator it again will develop condensation.  Over time 
the MMA will have enough water in it to become discolored.  I am surprised you 
are not seeing the discoloration in the MMA liquid as it poured as a warning 
not to use it. 



We have fair control of temperature in the laboratory and are generally between 
68F to 75F with the average as around 70F.  We have never had a problem with 
the MMA polymerizing or developing a water content.  It is stored in a dark 
cabinet that is in an area I would say is a little cooler than the room.  We 
generally don't polymerize in the cold at 4C however, you timing seems long for 
the process.  It is best not to disturb the vials too much once you are in the 
embedding phase.  Movement or inversion of the vials can cause a problem as the 
MMA will polymerize from the bottom up and remixing it can slow the process.  
Also make sure you tops are tight at this step.



Pam Marcum

UPENN Vet Sch

New Botlon Center



- Original Message -
From: Jack Ratliff ratliffj...@hotmail.com
To: Ooi Ting Huay ooi.ting.h...@nhc.com.sg, 
histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu 
histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2009 9:24:29 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [Histonet] Cloudy MMA embedded block

Ooi,

Somehow you are getting moisture/water mixed in with the MMA solution(s). I 
only remember visiting the IMCB facility, so if this is not your facility then 
I am not sure of your laboratory environment (air temperature/humidity). The 
best thing I can tell you at this point is to try and find ways to reduce the 
chance for moisture accumulation.

I am pretty sure that at a minimum you are storing your catalyst and monomer 
(MMA) at 4C and your softner (DBP) at room temp. Maybe you should take extra 
steps to ensure your chemicals are at room temp before any use. Lastly, your 
polymerization is taking too long for your small 20mL vials. My specimens of 
similar size require only 3-5 days to completely polymerize. Now, I dont 
remember your concentration of catalyst, but if it is around 2.5g/1L embedding 
solution, try skipping the 4C step and use room temp (23C) until the specimens 
are polymerized. Then finish them off in the oven when they are tacky or mostly 
hard on top. The 4C step is mostly to slow the polymerization for larger 
specimens requiring a larger volume of solution and/or when the lab temp cannot 
be controlled routinely at or below 23C. The water bath then also helps to 
regulate the temperature of the polymerization in the case where the lab 
environment is too cool (20C) and retarding the rate of polymerzation.

The main thing to keep in mind is that the lab environment pretty much controls 
the process and is probably the main variable that will contrast labs that 
perform the exact same method.

Jack



On Apr 21, 2009, at 12:33 AM, ooi.ting.h...@nhc.com.sg wrote:

 Hi,

 I am trying very hard to get a clear MMA embedded block. I am  
 appreciate
 if there is any advice on doing it. I am using 100% MMA (liquid) and  
 0.5%
 Perkadox 16 (powder) to do the embedding. I have tried to embed the  
 sample
 in different conditions. However, it seems to be extremely hard to  
 get a
 clear embedded block.

 Below are the methods that I have tried.

 1. Before embedding, bring the MMA and perkadox 16 to room  
 temperature.
 After a few mix it by invertion, I aliquot the solution to the glass  
 vials
 that contain samples or simply glass vials that without sample. I  
 put the
 glass vials (both with and without sample) in 4 degree, room  
 temperature
 and even 37degree oven.

 2. Mix the MMA and perkadox when it is cold, invert it a few times.
 Aliquot it to glass vials that contain sample or without sample. Put  
 in
 4degree, room temperature and 37degree oven.

 I have also tried to speed up the 

Re: [Histonet] BRDU, Tetracycline, calcein in bone

2009-04-21 Thread Robert Schoonhoven
You can also perform BrdU on the MMA sections the BrdU label is quite hardy.

Robert Schoonhoven





From: Nancy W. Troiano nancy.troi...@yale.edu
To: histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2009 1:37:01 PM
Subject: [Histonet] BRDU, Tetracycline, calcein in bone

I would recommend fixing the bones in 70% ethanol, embedding in 
methylmethacrylate undecalcified and cutting 8 - 10 micron thick sections for 
visualization of tetracycline and/or calcein labels.   Decalcification will 
remove fluorescent labels bound to the mineral in bone as mineral is removed by 
decal procedures.  You may need a larger microtome (Polycut) to cut these bones 
depending on the size.  The fluorescent labels in combination with a nice von 
Kossa stain would certainly show formation/ mineralization of bone in this area 
which you can quantify using an Osteomeasure or other system, however, you may 
want to do a few in paraffin for optimal BRDU label preservation.  I would 
recommend a slow embedding method for these bones - you can check our article 
in the JOH, June 2004, Vol. 27(2) pp119-130 which describes our slow embedding 
method for rat bones which can be adapted for rabbit bones.  You can contact me 
for suggestions and with questions if you
 would like to. 

___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet



  
___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


Re: [Histonet] Reusing specimen containers

2009-04-21 Thread Daniel Schneider
I have no idea what CAP or JCAHO says about this but it's a very bad idea.
Cross contamination happens.  If you reuse containers -- and I don't care
what precautions you take -- you will rarely or occasionally fail to
adequately clean a container and you will end up mixing patient tissues.

The cost of a specimen container is a minute fraction of the cost of
processing a specimen.  Ask yourself how much money you're really saving.
You're scrapping for pennies.  Or is this some sort of green initiative?
 In any case, it's asking for problems

Daniel Schneider





On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 11:43 AM, Kelly Colpitts kelly_colpi...@hotmail.com
 wrote:


 Hi Histoland!



 I'm just wondering what folks out there are doing about specimen
 containers.  Is anyone cleaning them out and reusing them?  Is there any CAP
 or Joint Commission regulations that say that all specimen containers can
 only be used once or can you reuse them as long as they have been thoroughly
 cleaned?



 Thanks for you all your input,

 Kelly

 _
 Windows Live™ SkyDrive™: Get 25 GB of free online storage.

 http://windowslive.com/online/skydrive?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_skydrive_042009___
 Histonet mailing list
 Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
 http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet

___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet