RE: [Histonet] Re: Histonet Digest, Vol 83, Issue 20

2010-10-16 Thread histotech
Joyce,

THANK YOU for the link!  :o)

Now I wonder, if this is over a year old, is the the first time it's been
seen on Histonet, or did I just miss this important update?

This is really going to help the widget count in my lab!  My paths
frequently want to test more than one block on their tumor cases and now I
can charge for them!

:o)

Michelle


-Original Message-
From: Weems, Joyce [mailto:jwe...@sjha.org] 
Sent: Friday, October 15, 2010 10:45 AM
To: histot...@imagesbyhopper.com
Cc: histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: RE: [Histonet] Re: Histonet Digest, Vol 83, Issue 20


http://www.flpath.org/rli2.asp

Here is a link that will help..  

-Original Message-
From: histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
[mailto:histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of
histot...@imagesbyhopper.com
Sent: Friday, October 15, 2010 09:59
To: Weems, Joyce
Cc: histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: Re: [Histonet] Re: Histonet Digest, Vol 83, Issue 20

Can you please provide the specific CMS update number?  The website doesn't
seem to be too user friendly ...   thanks!



On Oct 14, 2010, at 12:22 PM, Weems, Joyce jwe...@sjha.org wrote:

 
 CMS/NCCI Update Dated October 1, 2009
 
 8. The unit of service for special stains (CPT codes 88312-88313) and
 immunohistochemistry (CPT codes 88342, 88360, 88361) is each stain. If 
 it is medically reasonable and necessary to perform the same stain on 
 more than one specimen or more than one block of tissue from the same 
 specimen, additional units of service may be reported for the 
 additional specimen(s) or block(s). Physicians should not report more 
 than one unit of service for a stain performed on a single tissue 
 block. For example it is common practice to cut multiple levels from a 
 tissue block and stain each level with the same stain. The multiple 
 levels from the same block of tissue stained with the same stain 
 should not be reported as additional units of service. Only one unit 
 of service should be reported for the stain on multiple levels from 
 the single tissue block. Additionally, controls performed with special 
 stains should not be reported as separate units of service for the 
 stain.
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Mike Pence [mailto:mpe...@grhs.net]
 Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2010 11:31
 To: Weems, Joyce; histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
 Subject: RE: [Histonet] Re: Histonet Digest, Vol 83, Issue 20
 
 Can you site your source, please.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
 [mailto:histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of Weems,
 Joyce
 Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2010 10:25 AM
 To: histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
 Subject: RE: [Histonet] Re: Histonet Digest, Vol 83, Issue 20
 
 
 
 
 The change is that you can bill per block now and not per specimen. 
 This is for immunos and special stains. It does make a huge difference!
 
 Best,
 
 Joyce Weems
 Pathology Manager
 Saint Joseph's Hospital
 5665 Peachtree Dunwoody Rd NE
 Atlanta, GA 30342
 678-843-7376 - Phone
 678-843-7831 - Fax
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
 [mailto:histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of Chris
 Evanish
 Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2010 11:10
 To: histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
 Subject: [Histonet] Re: Histonet Digest, Vol 83, Issue 20
 
 Has anyone heard of a cpt coding change that allows us to bill 88342 
 per slide run instead of per antibody? One of our Pathologist was at a 
 conference and was told that we could do that. It makes a big 
 difference with running cytokeratins on multiple blocks and levels of 
 sentinel nodes.
 
  Thanks,
 Chris Evanish
 Montgomery Hospital
 Norristown PA
 
 Chris D. Evanish
 Histology Supervisor
 Montgomery Hospital
 610-270-2379
 
 Please consider the environment before printing this email  to your 
 outgoing mail.
 Confidentiality Notice:
 This e-mail, including any attachments is the property of Catholic Health
East and is intended for the sole use of the intended recipient(s).  
 It may contain information that is privileged and confidential.  Any
unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you
are not the intended recipient, please delete this message, and reply to the
sender regarding the error in a separate email.
 
 
 ___
 Histonet mailing list
 Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu 
 http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
 
 
 Confidentiality Notice:
 This e-mail, including any attachments is the property of Catholic
 Health East and is intended for the sole use of the intended 
 recipient(s).
 It may contain information that is privileged and confidential.  Any 
 unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. 
 If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message, and 
 reply to the sender regarding the error in a separate email.
 
 
 

[Histonet] AFB

2010-10-16 Thread Cheryl Crowder
Amy - The AFB (Ziehl-Neelsen, Kinyoun's, etc) will stain any acid-fast 
bacteria.  The Fite's stain is usually considered specific for mycobacteria.
Cheryl
 
___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


Re: [Histonet] IHC FILD

2010-10-16 Thread pru...@ihctech.net
it depends on who you are working with, it would be a requirement to work 
for me since i specialize in IHC, but other employers may not value it as 
much, in any case as Mark said, it is investing in yourself.



From: Langenberg, Stacey stacey.langenb...@ucdenver.edu
Sent: Friday, October 15, 2010 1:29 PM
To: Mark Turner scorpionri...@cox.net, 
histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu 
histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu, Debora Probst 
debora.pro...@crhs.net, histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu 
histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: Re: [Histonet] IHC FILD 

Well said Mark!
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile

-Original Message-
From: Mark Turner 
Sender: histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu

Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 12:46:59 
To: Debora Probst; histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: Re: [Histonet] IHC FILD

Since it wasn't a requirement for my position, I took the exam for my own 
personal satisfaction. I highly recommend taking it if you have the chance 
and not worrying about whether you will receive extra money. Successfully 
passing the exam is a personal milestone and may not be recognized by your 
current employer, however it just might make a future one consider 
investing a little stronger in you because you have invested in yourself.

Good luck!

Mark Turner

 Debora Probst wrote: 
 Can anyone tell me if once you have taken the IHC certification test and
 passed dose the administration consider that a specialty field and give
 you a pay increase? Or is it just for a persons own gratification to
 take it and pass? 
 
 ___
 Histonet mailing list
 Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
 http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet

___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet

 
___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


RE: [Histonet] negative controls

2010-10-16 Thread histotech
I run both positive and negative controls.  Wherever possible, I put the
positive control on the same slide as the test patient (this makes it easier
for the pathologist and it also saves us the cost of on slide being tested).
I always run a negative patient control on the exact same run.  If I have
more slides than will fit on one run, I will hold the specific case back, as
I won't separate them.  Matters not if there is more than one machine, the
case will stay together.

As far as negatives, I will run an extra negative if my run has both poly
and mono antibodies.  So, there are many times, I have two negatives running
per case.  I run only one detection system, so I don't have that variable to
deal with.

Michelle



-Original Message-
From: histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
[mailto:histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of Kuhnla,
Melissa
Sent: Friday, October 15, 2010 12:50 PM
To: Victoria Baker; Histo Net list server
Subject: RE: [Histonet] negative controls


Hi Vikki,
I have 1 Ventana XT and 3 Ultras.  I have certain antibodies designated to
each ultra.  This means not all slides from any case are guaranteed to be on
the same machine.  They obviously all have their own detection kit.  My
theory is that our detection kits are QCd prior to initial load onto an
instrument. The patient block was treated the same prior to cutting. The
slides receive solutions that are QCd...I think we are covered. What are
your thoughts? Melissa
  

-Original Message-
From: histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
[mailto:histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of Victoria
Baker
Sent: Friday, October 15, 2010 10:26 AM
To: Histo Net list server
Subject: [Histonet] negative controls

Hi
I have a hypothetical question to those who run IHC on Ventana instruments.
Are you running your negatives with your patient/test cases or on a separate
run?  Also, if you are doing this and have to use a different detection kit
how do you work the QA/QC portion of this for CAP requirements.

Thanks

Vikki
___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


The information in this e-mail, and any attachments therein, is confidential
and for use by the intended addressee only. If this message is received by
you in error please do not disseminate or read further. Please reply to the
sender that you have received the message in error, then delete the message.
Although Catholic Health Services of Long Island attempts to sweep e-mail
and attachments for viruses, it does not guarantee that either are
virus-free and accepts no liability for any damage sustained as a result of
viruses. Thank you.



___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
Version: 8.5.448 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3183 - Release Date: 10/13/10
18:34:00


___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


[Histonet] Microsporidia

2010-10-16 Thread Aazath Raj

Dear Friends,
  Can anyone tell me how to demonstrate Micrsporidia in Deudenal 
biopsy.For me the modified Brown and bren gram is not working.if u have any 
other method pls let me know.
 
 
with regrads,
Aazath
___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet