RE: [Histonet] TMA Arrayers

2015-04-30 Thread Helen Fedor
Hello, We have the Pathology Devices Semi automated units. We are happy with 
them. Our decision to keep with the less automated units are largely due to our 
work flow. We make TMA's for customers. But the customer has to do all of the 
work in the design and data entry into out TMAJ Database. I think all of the 
automated units have data input features that are not compatible with this work 
flow.



Good luck in choosing.

Helen L. Fedor 

Oncology Tissue Services, Manager
Johns Hopkins University
411 N. Caroline St 
Room 310 Basement| Bond St Annex Building
Baltimore, MD | 21231

410-614-1660

http://tmalab.jhmi.edu/






-Original Message-
From: histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu 
[mailto:histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of Sally Ann Drew
Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2015 1:36 PM
To: histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: [Histonet] TMA Arrayers

I was wondering how many people have semi-automated or automated tissue 
microarray equipment? I am especially interested in those who graduated from 
manual methods to the automated and how they reviewed and ranked the limited 
options out there.

Thank you!
_Sally

Sally Ann Drew, MT(ASCP)
UWSMPH-Dept. of Pathology 
TRIP Lab Manager 
Translational Science BioCore
CSC, L5/181
608.265.1093



___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet

___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


[Histonet] TMA Arrayers

2015-04-30 Thread Sally Ann Drew
I was wondering how many people have semi-automated or automated tissue 
microarray equipment? I am especially interested in those who graduated from 
manual methods to the automated and how they reviewed and ranked the limited 
options out there.

Thank you!
_Sally

Sally Ann Drew, MT(ASCP)
UWSMPH-Dept. of Pathology 
TRIP Lab Manager 
Translational Science BioCore
CSC, L5/181
608.265.1093



___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


[Histonet] Disopsal of containers?

2015-04-30 Thread Johnson, Carole
This may sound like a really sophomoric question but I'll ask anyway. How do 
you dispose of  specimen containers from your histo tissues once they are 
emptied and rinsed? This question came up at work (veterinary diagnostic lab) 
and I am not aware of a standard or a reference to go to for an answer. Thanks 
in advance.

Carole Johnson
Carole Johnson, HT(ASCP)cm
New Mexico Department of Agriculture
Veterinary Diagnostic Services
505.383.9299

To understand is to stand under, which is to look up, which is a good way to 
understand




Confidentiality Notice: New Mexico has a very broad public records law. Most 
written communications to or from state employees are public records. Your 
e-mail communications may therefore be subject to public disclosure. This 
e-mail, including all attachments is for the sole use of the intended 
recipients. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is 
prohibited unless specifically provided under the New Mexico Inspection of 
Public Records Act.
___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


[Histonet] Question

2015-04-30 Thread Bernice Frederick
All,
I have a procedure here that call for and I quote 1.25 ml NaOH 10N in 1L of 
water. I know how to get 1 N, but how do I get 10. Having rarely hd the 
opportunity to make many Normal solutions ,my brain is not computing. Is it an 
error?
Bernice

Bernice Frederick HTL (ASCP)
Senior Research Tech
Pathology Core Facility
Robert. H. Lurie Cancer Center
Northwestern University
710 N Fairbanks Court
Olson 8-421
Chicago,IL 60611
312-503-3723
b-freder...@northwestern.edumailto:b-freder...@northwestern.edu

___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


[Histonet] RE: Question

2015-04-30 Thread Morken, Timothy
Bernice, You have to buy the 10N solution. You can only dilute a given normal 
solution, you cannot concentrate them.


Tim Morken
Pathology Site Manager, Parnassus 
Supervisor, Electron Microscopy/Neuromuscular Special Studies
Department of Pathology
UC San Francisco Medical Center






-Original Message-
From: histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu 
[mailto:histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of Bernice 
Frederick
Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2015 12:35 PM
To: Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: [Histonet] Question

All,
I have a procedure here that call for and I quote 1.25 ml NaOH 10N in 1L of 
water. I know how to get 1 N, but how do I get 10. Having rarely hd the 
opportunity to make many Normal solutions ,my brain is not computing. Is it an 
error?
Bernice

Bernice Frederick HTL (ASCP)
Senior Research Tech
Pathology Core Facility
Robert. H. Lurie Cancer Center
Northwestern University
710 N Fairbanks Court
Olson 8-421
Chicago,IL 60611
312-503-3723
b-freder...@northwestern.edumailto:b-freder...@northwestern.edu

___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet

___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


RE: [Histonet] ANP.23410

2015-04-30 Thread Joelle Weaver
Usually I have done weekly , but in rather high usage places. With more strict 
downtimes and decontamination for TB or other suspected infectious cases.


Joelle Weaver MAOM, HTL (ASCP) QIHC


  

 
 From: dknut...@primecare.org
 To: histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
 Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 14:20:54 -0500
 Subject: [Histonet] ANP.23410
 
 Hi fellow Histonetters -
 
 I was wondering if I could get some feedback from my peers on how you are 
 dealing with the CAP standard
 ANP.23410 on Cryostat Decontamination.
 It states that this is done at defined intervals appropriate for the 
 institution.
 The place I just inspected was doing a weekly decontaminating, and a more 
 thorough one quarterly.
 
 I would like to know how often are other sites taking apart the entire 
 cryostat chamber for decontamination.
 
 Thank you so much for sharing your process.
 
 Deanne Knutson
 Supervisor
 Anatomic Pathology
 
 
 
 
 
 This email may include confidential and privileged information. If this is 
 not intended for your use, please destroy immediately and contact the sender 
 of the message.
 
 This email and attachments contain information that may be confidential or 
 privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, notify the sender at once 
 and delete this message completely from your information system. Further use, 
 disclosure, or copying of information contained in this email is not 
 authorized, and any such action should not be construed as a waiver of 
 privilege or other confidentiality protections.
 ___
 Histonet mailing list
 Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
 http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
  
___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


[Histonet] ANP.23410

2015-04-30 Thread Knutson, Deanne
Hi fellow Histonetters -

I was wondering if I could get some feedback from my peers on how you are 
dealing with the CAP standard
ANP.23410 on Cryostat Decontamination.
It states that this is done at defined intervals appropriate for the 
institution.
The place I just inspected was doing a weekly decontaminating, and a more 
thorough one quarterly.

I would like to know how often are other sites taking apart the entire cryostat 
chamber for decontamination.

Thank you so much for sharing your process.

Deanne Knutson
Supervisor
Anatomic Pathology





This email may include confidential and privileged information. If this is not 
intended for your use, please destroy immediately and contact the sender of the 
message.

This email and attachments contain information that may be confidential or 
privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, notify the sender at once 
and delete this message completely from your information system. Further use, 
disclosure, or copying of information contained in this email is not 
authorized, and any such action should not be construed as a waiver of 
privilege or other confidentiality protections.
___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


FW: [Histonet] IHC and oven temperature

2015-04-30 Thread Tony Henwood (SCHN)

Yes,

I read the Dako IPX educational guides (5th ed) and on page 32:
No processes should raise tissue temperature to higher than 60oC as this will 
cause severe loss of antigenicity that may not be recoverable
Unfortunately there is no evidence given or cited that validates this 
statement. Even though this could be right (and there are several papers that 
have looked at this), this statement is scientifically weak and we should not 
cite this as truth.

Now I do recommend the Dako reference series to my students, and I have 
contributed to one of these texts myself (Microscopic control of routine HE - 
know your histology) but I request my students to continue to question what 
they read and confirm the scientific validity of the information.

Regards,
Tony


From: Joelle Weaver [joellewea...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, 25 April 2015 5:51 AM
To: Tony Henwood (SCHN); WILLIAM DESALVO; Preiszner, Johanna
Cc: histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: RE: [Histonet] IHC and oven temperature

I remember reading that the preffered temperature was about 60 degrees Celsius. 
I think that this was in the Dako education guides if I'm not mistaken. If that 
is the case, the citation for the source is probably in that resource available 
as pdf from their website.


Joelle Weaver MAOM, HTL (ASCP) QIHC





 From: tony.henw...@health.nsw.gov.au
 To: wdesalvo@outlook.com; preis...@mail.etsu.edu
 Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 09:43:59 +
 Subject: RE: [Histonet] IHC and oven temperature
 CC: histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu

 Hi temp drying shown to be a bad idea:

 Henwood, A., (2005) “Effect of Slide Drying at 80°C on Immunohistochemistry” 
 J Histotechnol 28(1):45-46.

 Abstract

 Prolonged high temperature dry heating has been found to be deleterious to 
 the immunohistochemical demonstration of several antigens in formalin-fixed, 
 paraffin- embedded sections. Paraffin sections were dried at 80°C for 7 h and 
 their immunoreactivity was compared with mirror sections dried for 1 h at 
 60°C. NCL-5D3, CMV, S100, HMB45, and CEA were quite labile to dry overheating 
 whereas AElAE3, HBsAg, HBcAg, HSVII, EMA, chromogranin, and NSE were found to 
 be quite resistant. It is recommended that coated slides (poly-L-lysine or 
 aminopropyltriethoxysilane) and low-temperature drying (60°C) be routinely 
 used for irnmunohistochemistry.

 
 From: histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu 
 [histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu] on behalf of WILLIAM DESALVO 
 [wdesalvo@outlook.com]
 Sent: Tuesday, 21 April 2015 1:56 AM
 To: Preiszner, Johanna
 Cc: histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
 Subject: Re: [Histonet] IHC and oven temperature

 Dry heat compared to wet heat. Do not dry your slides at high heat. You are 
 removing water trapped between slide and paraffin section. Antigen retrieval 
 is an entirely different process. So not try to combine the two processes

 Sent from my iPhone

  On Apr 20, 2015, at 8:48 AM, Preiszner, Johanna preis...@mail.etsu.edu 
  wrote:
 
  Hi Netters,
 
  is there something wrong with this logic:
 
  If the tissue needs 95C for HIER, it's ok to dry the slides in an 82C 
  oven.
 
  Of course I'll test it before I try it on real specimens, but maybe someone 
  else already knows the answer...
 
  Thanks!
 
  Hanna Preiszner
  ETSU/QCOM
 
 
  ___
  Histonet mailing list
  Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
  http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet

 ___
 Histonet mailing list
 Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
 http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet

 *
 This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended 
 solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If 
 you are not the intended recipient, please delete it and notify the sender.

 Views expressed in this message and any attachments are those of the 
 individual sender, and are not necessarily the views of The Sydney Children's 
 Hospitals Network.

 This note also confirms that this email message has been virus scanned and 
 although no computer viruses were detected, The Sydney Childrens Hospital's 
 Network accepts no liability for any consequential damage resulting from 
 email containing computer viruses.
 *

 ___
 Histonet mailing list
 Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
 http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet

*
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended 
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If 
you are not the 

[Histonet] RE: IHC billing question

2015-04-30 Thread Mike Pence
Ouch!

-Original Message-
From: histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu 
[mailto:histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of Cartun, Richard
Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2015 4:34 PM
To: histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: [Histonet] IHC billing question

Effective January 1, 2015, our LIS team removed all of the CPT 88342 codes for 
IHC from our CoPath stain dictionary since you couldn't tell whether a 
Cytokeratin-7 was being performed as an 88341 or as an 88342.  Now, as you 
might have expected,  none of the inpatient IHC testing has been accounted 
for (the outpatient IHC has been billed manually from the pathology report), 
and they want someone to go back and enter all the CPT codes into the system 
(hopefully, not me!).  Has anyone else encountered this problem?  Thanks (I 
think).

Richard

Richard W. Cartun, MS, PhD
Director, Histology  Immunopathology
Director, Biospecimen Collection Programs Assistant Director, Anatomic 
Pathology Hartford Hospital
80 Seymour Street
Hartford, CT  06102
(860) 972-1596
(860) 545-2204 Fax


This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the 
intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. 
Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you 
are not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for 
delivering the message to the intended recipient, please contact the sender by 
reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message, including any 
attachments.
___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet

___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


RE: [Histonet] IHC billing question

2015-04-30 Thread Mike Pence
We do all of our IHC billing manually.

-Original Message-
From: histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu 
[mailto:histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of WILLIAM DESALVO
Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2015 4:43 PM
To: Cartun, Richard
Cc: histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: Re: [Histonet] IHC billing question

We have to manually review the IHC billing also and continue to audit. It took 
billing and IT three months to create the logic to automate billing for a 
specimen and account for combination of there being the possibility of 88341, 
88342  88344 and the proper combinations.

Sent from my iPhone

 On Apr 30, 2015, at 2:34 PM, Cartun, Richard richard.car...@hhchealth.org 
 wrote:
 
 Effective January 1, 2015, our LIS team removed all of the CPT 88342 codes 
 for IHC from our CoPath stain dictionary since you couldn't tell whether a 
 Cytokeratin-7 was being performed as an 88341 or as an 88342.  Now, as 
 you might have expected,  none of the inpatient IHC testing has been 
 accounted for (the outpatient IHC has been billed manually from the pathology 
 report), and they want someone to go back and enter all the CPT codes into 
 the system (hopefully, not me!).  Has anyone else encountered this problem?  
 Thanks (I think).
 
 Richard
 
 Richard W. Cartun, MS, PhD
 Director, Histology  Immunopathology
 Director, Biospecimen Collection Programs Assistant Director, Anatomic 
 Pathology Hartford Hospital
 80 Seymour Street
 Hartford, CT  06102
 (860) 972-1596
 (860) 545-2204 Fax
 
 
 This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the 
 intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged 
 information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is 
 prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent 
 responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, please 
 contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original 
 message, including any attachments.
 ___
 Histonet mailing list
 Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
 http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet

___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet

___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


[Histonet] RE... Frozen section fixation problems

2015-04-30 Thread Gayle Callis
I have been following this with interest both now and in the past.  

 

A word of caution about the acetone/ethanol fixation.  I did NOT use the
acetone/alcohol fixative cold, but at RT (as it was taught to me by an IHC
expert).   That is a bonus since you don't have to maintain A/A fixative in
a refrigerator.   It could be that in Brett's hands, A/A at -20C works well
so I can't argue with a successful variation for this fixative.A major
caveat:  A/A is used for rodent CD markers and cannot be used for human CD4
or CD8 as reported by the late Dr. Chris van der Loos.  He and I
collaborated about frozen section fixatives many times along with trying
each other's method.   He always had success with 4C acetone in very humid
The Netherlands but was careful to air dry the sections overnight in front
of a fan.These two human CD markers do not tolerate ethanol
consequently, I wouldn't use A/A for any human CD marker work.We  have
used it exclusively for murine and rat CD markers and Q-fever organisms.   A
good rule it to have a panel of fixation methods in order to optimize
fixation for any given antigen.   

 

I do not understand why Patrick has such problems using cold acetone
fixation which leads to poor sections.We air dried frozen sections for a
minimum of 30 min before A/A fixation.   Most of the time, frozen sections
were cut and immediately dried at RT for up to 4 hours, then stored in a box
containing only one day's worth of staining.  The unfixed sections are
stored at -80C with a bag of silica gel in the box (25 slide capacity).  The
slide box can be taken out the night before staining, or even the day of
staining with lid on to NOT GET WATER CONDENSATION ON THE SECTION.   Water
condensation can damage morphology and antigens.   I would NEVER use an
acetone gradient for fixation since the increase in water could be a cause
of the damage.  Water is not going to maintain isotonic conditions and
prevent damage.   If you want to blow away a frozen section after acetone
fixation, just rinse with watera sure way to damage the morphology.
After acetone fixation only (10 min at 4C), air dry section for 15 min, then
go into  PBS or TBS. 

 

Before fixation, use barrier pen i.e. ImmEdge (vortexed to mix components
before drawing around section) from Vector around section, then fix in A/A
10 min @RT and then go immediately from A/A into pure PBS for 3 changes.
The 4th change is PBS/0.2% Tween 20 to equilibrate the section for IHC
buffer conditions. 

 

What I suspect, after so many continued problems, is the snap freezing of
the tissue may be done improperly and the damage could be excessive freezing
artifact.   Something is amiss and it may be BEFORE FIXATION with the
acetone.   

 

In general, I have found methanol to be a poor fixative for IHC, and should
be totally avoided for any CD marker work since it causes protein hydrolysis
of the epitope causing weak, poor staining.   4% paraformaldehyde @ 4C
without antigen retrieval can give weak staining and antigen retrieval with
frozen sections has to be done carefully to maintain delicate sections on
the slide.95%, even 100%, ethanol can also result in weak staining.   

 

You did not say what epitopes you are trying to preserve and stain for?   I
don't think the plus charge slides are the culprit since I had labs using
acetone fixation of FS on plain glass slides before Plus charge was so
popular.  Are you sure your PBS or TBS is correctly made?   Incorrectly made
PBS  caused morphology havoc to completely blow away my frozen sections.
This led to purchasing Sigma Dulbecco PBS which never gave problems.  

 

Maybe you can describe more of what you are doing from the time you receive
and snap freeze the tissues, species, etc., including manual or automated
staining in order to have other help you chase away these annoying
gremlins.  

 

Gayle M. Callis

HTL/HT/MT(ASCP)  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Patrick,

 

We do a lot of frozen section IHC work. Years ago Gayle Callis turned me on
to fixing in cold acetone:ethanol (3:1) . We keep it at -20C and I fix for
10  min. on the bench then wash in PBS and proceed with the IHC. We do dry
slides for at least 30 min before fixing.  This has worked well in our hands
for many different antibodies.

 

Brett

 

Brett M. Connolly, Ph.D.

Principle Scientist, Imaging Dept.

Merck  Co., Inc.

PO Box 4, WP-44K

West Point, PA 19486

brett_connolly @t merck.com

T- 215-652-2501

F- 215-993-6803

 

 

 

-Original Message-

From: histonet-bounces @t lists.utsouthwestern.edu
[mailto:histonet-bounces @t lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of Lewis,
Patrick

Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2015 5:56 PM

To: (Histonet @t lists.utsouthwestern.edu)

Subject: [Histonet] Acetone fixation problems with OCT Tissues

 

 

Hi Everyone,

 

I am still having issues with my IHCs with Acetone fixation.

 

If I fix in 100% Acetone, I get IHC staining, but my tissues are 50-90%
destroyed.

 

If I fix 

Re: [Histonet] IHC billing question

2015-04-30 Thread WILLIAM DESALVO
We have to manually review the IHC billing also and continue to audit. It took 
billing and IT three months to create the logic to automate billing for a 
specimen and account for combination of there being the possibility of 88341, 
88342  88344 and the proper combinations.

Sent from my iPhone

 On Apr 30, 2015, at 2:34 PM, Cartun, Richard richard.car...@hhchealth.org 
 wrote:
 
 Effective January 1, 2015, our LIS team removed all of the CPT 88342 codes 
 for IHC from our CoPath stain dictionary since you couldn't tell whether a 
 Cytokeratin-7 was being performed as an 88341 or as an 88342.  Now, as 
 you might have expected,  none of the inpatient IHC testing has been 
 accounted for (the outpatient IHC has been billed manually from the pathology 
 report), and they want someone to go back and enter all the CPT codes into 
 the system (hopefully, not me!).  Has anyone else encountered this problem?  
 Thanks (I think).
 
 Richard
 
 Richard W. Cartun, MS, PhD
 Director, Histology  Immunopathology
 Director, Biospecimen Collection Programs
 Assistant Director, Anatomic Pathology
 Hartford Hospital
 80 Seymour Street
 Hartford, CT  06102
 (860) 972-1596
 (860) 545-2204 Fax
 
 
 This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the 
 intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged 
 information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is 
 prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent 
 responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, please 
 contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original 
 message, including any attachments.
 ___
 Histonet mailing list
 Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
 http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet

___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


Re: [Histonet] IHC billing question

2015-04-30 Thread Garreyf
Your Lis should not have done that.
If you are using Copath/Cerner, I think they have automated it now according to 
their most recent newsletter. Currently, I have to manually change the 88342's 
to 1's It's somewhat of a pain. But, your Lis should have consulted someone 
before deleting all codes. Your pathologists should have been on top of it as 
well imho. Unfortunately, someone has to change. It may be too late to bill too 
for some.
Garrey

Sent from my iPhone

 On Apr 30, 2015, at 5:44 PM, Mike Pence mpe...@grhs.net wrote:
 
 We do all of our IHC billing manually.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu 
 [mailto:histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of WILLIAM 
 DESALVO
 Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2015 4:43 PM
 To: Cartun, Richard
 Cc: histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
 Subject: Re: [Histonet] IHC billing question
 
 We have to manually review the IHC billing also and continue to audit. It 
 took billing and IT three months to create the logic to automate billing for 
 a specimen and account for combination of there being the possibility of 
 88341, 88342  88344 and the proper combinations.
 
 Sent from my iPhone
 
 On Apr 30, 2015, at 2:34 PM, Cartun, Richard richard.car...@hhchealth.org 
 wrote:
 
 Effective January 1, 2015, our LIS team removed all of the CPT 88342 codes 
 for IHC from our CoPath stain dictionary since you couldn't tell whether a 
 Cytokeratin-7 was being performed as an 88341 or as an 88342.  Now, as 
 you might have expected,  none of the inpatient IHC testing has been 
 accounted for (the outpatient IHC has been billed manually from the 
 pathology report), and they want someone to go back and enter all the CPT 
 codes into the system (hopefully, not me!).  Has anyone else encountered 
 this problem?  Thanks (I think).
 
 Richard
 
 Richard W. Cartun, MS, PhD
 Director, Histology  Immunopathology
 Director, Biospecimen Collection Programs Assistant Director, Anatomic 
 Pathology Hartford Hospital
 80 Seymour Street
 Hartford, CT  06102
 (860) 972-1596
 (860) 545-2204 Fax
 
 
 This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the 
 intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged 
 information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is 
 prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent 
 responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, please 
 contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original 
 message, including any attachments.
 ___
 Histonet mailing list
 Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
 http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
 
 ___
 Histonet mailing list
 Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
 http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
 
 ___
 Histonet mailing list
 Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
 http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet

___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


Re: FW: [Histonet] IHC and oven temperature

2015-04-30 Thread John Kiernan
The statement quoted by Tony from the Dako manual cannot be true because many 
antigens have to be exposed to water at 100C in order to be immunostained - 
antigen retrieval. Denaturation of a macromolecule by heat increases the number 
of exposed epitopes, which typically are short amino acid sequences that bind 
specifically to the Fab segments of antibody molecules. 

On the other hand, it is easy to believe that 60C would denature antibody 
molecules enough to damage their binding sites and impair or prevent 
immunostaining. According to AWP Vermeer and W Norde (2000), the Fab segments 
of IgG were denatured when the temperature of a solution slightly exceeded 60C. 
(The Thermal Stability of Immunoglobulin: Unfolding and Aggregation of a 
Multi-Domain Protein Biophysical Journal 78: 394–404.) They found that further 
heating denatured the Fc segment, but the changed molecules became entangled 
and aggregated before denaturation was complete. Microwave heating is sometimes 
used to accelerate immunostaining, but control of the temperature is critical. 
For example: ME Boon  E Marani (1991) The major importance of temperature 
data in publications concerning microwave techniques European Journal of 
Morphology 29: 181–183. 

 John Kiernan
London, Canada
= = =
On 30/04/15, Tony Henwood (SCHN)  tony.henw...@health.nsw.gov.au wrote:
 
 Yes,
 
 I read the Dako IPX educational guides (5th ed) and on page 32:
 No processes should raise tissue temperature to higher than 60oC as this 
 will cause severe loss of antigenicity that may not be recoverable
 Unfortunately there is no evidence given or cited that validates this 
 statement. Even though this could be right (and there are several papers that 
 have looked at this), this statement is scientifically weak and we should not 
 cite this as truth.
 
 Now I do recommend the Dako reference series to my students, and I have 
 contributed to one of these texts myself (Microscopic control of routine HE 
 - know your histology) but I request my students to continue to question what 
 they read and confirm the scientific validity of the information.
 
 Regards,
 Tony
 
 
 From: Joelle Weaver [joellewea...@hotmail.com]
 Sent: Saturday, 25 April 2015 5:51 AM
 To: Tony Henwood (SCHN); WILLIAM DESALVO; Preiszner, Johanna
 Cc: histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
 Subject: RE: [Histonet] IHC and oven temperature
 
 I remember reading that the preferred temperature was about 60 degrees 
 Celsius. I think that this was in the Dako education guides if I'm not 
 mistaken. If that is the case, the citation for the source is probably in 
 that resource available as pdf from their website.
 
 
 Joelle Weaver MAOM, HTL (ASCP) QIHC
 
 
 
 
 
  From: tony.henw...@health.nsw.gov.au
  To: wdesalvo@outlook.com; preis...@mail.etsu.edu
  Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 09:43:59 +
  Subject: RE: [Histonet] IHC and oven temperature
  CC: histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
 
  Hi temp drying shown to be a bad idea:
 
  Henwood, A., (2005) “Effect of Slide Drying at 80°C on 
  Immunohistochemistry” J Histotechnol 28(1):45-46.
 
  Abstract
 
  Prolonged high temperature dry heating has been found to be deleterious to 
  the immunohistochemical demonstration of several antigens in 
  formalin-fixed, paraffin- embedded sections. Paraffin sections were dried 
  at 80°C for 7 h and their immunoreactivity was compared with mirror 
  sections dried for 1 h at 60°C. NCL-5D3, CMV, S100, HMB45, and CEA were 
  quite labile to dry overheating whereas AElAE3, HBsAg, HBcAg, HSVII, EMA, 
  chromogranin, and NSE were found to be quite resistant. It is recommended 
  that coated slides (poly-L-lysine or aminopropyltriethoxysilane) and 
  low-temperature drying (60°C) be routinely used for irnmunohistochemistry.
 
  
  From: histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu 
  [histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu] on behalf of WILLIAM DESALVO 
  [wdesalvo@outlook.com]
  Sent: Tuesday, 21 April 2015 1:56 AM
  To: Preiszner, Johanna
  Cc: histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
  Subject: Re: [Histonet] IHC and oven temperature
 
  Dry heat compared to wet heat. Do not dry your slides at high heat. You 
  are removing water trapped between slide and paraffin section. Antigen 
  retrieval is an entirely different process. So not try to combine the two 
  processes
 
  Sent from my iPhone
 
   On Apr 20, 2015, at 8:48 AM, Preiszner, Johanna preis...@mail.etsu.edu 
   wrote:
  
   Hi Netters,
  
   is there something wrong with this logic:
  
   If the tissue needs 95C for HIER, it's ok to dry the slides in an 82C 
   oven.
  
   Of course I'll test it before I try it on real specimens, but maybe 
   someone else already knows the answer...
  
   Thanks!
  
   Hanna Preiszner
   ETSU/QCOM
  
  
   ___
   Histonet mailing list
   Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
   

[Histonet] (no subject)

2015-04-30 Thread Carolyn Nelson
Hi, I was hoping someone can help me with tissue falling off the slides. I have 
tried regular slides with and without adhesive in the water bath. Charged 
slides with and without adhesive in the water bath. I have not changed the type 
of slides I’m using. All the chemicals are fresh in the processor and the stain 
line, as well as the paraffin in the processor. It is the worst on needle bx ( 
prostate and breast ). I am SO frustrated, any help would be greatly 
appreciated! 


Carolyn






Sent from Windows Mail___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


RE: [Histonet] (no subject)

2015-04-30 Thread Roy, Lisa
How long do you bake slides for before staining, at what temperature?  Does 
your stainer use agitation?

-Original Message-
From: histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu 
[mailto:histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of Carolyn Nelson
Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2015 11:41 AM
To: histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: [Histonet] (no subject)

Hi, I was hoping someone can help me with tissue falling off the slides. I have 
tried regular slides with and without adhesive in the water bath. Charged 
slides with and without adhesive in the water bath. I have not changed the type 
of slides I’m using. All the chemicals are fresh in the processor and the stain 
line, as well as the paraffin in the processor. It is the worst on needle bx ( 
prostate and breast ). I am SO frustrated, any help would be greatly 
appreciated! 


Carolyn






Sent from Windows Mail
-This e-mail and any attachments may contain CONFIDENTIAL information, 
including PROTECTED HEALTH INFORMATION. If you are not the intended recipient, 
any use or disclosure of this information is STRICTLY PROHIBITED; you are 
requested to delete this e-mail and any attachments, notify the sender 
immediately, and notify the LabCorp Privacy Officer at 
privacyoffi...@labcorp.com or call (877) 23-HIPAA / (877) 234-4722. 
___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet