Re: [Histonet] Detection Systems
Like Amos, I have extensive experience in working with biotin/streptavidin (BSA) detection systems, and use them primarily because, in my analyses, such reagents cost about half as much as polymers kits in the same volume containers. In addition, knowing that endogenous biotin can be problematic in a small number of different tissues, our (clinical) lab simply avoids using BSA in those situations. As required by CAP standards, our IHC policy acknowledges that we’ve conducted the necessary testing to determine if/when endogenous biotin makes interpretation challenging, and refrain from doing so when applicable. Finally, although I don’t agree with Carl’s belief that one MUST use the DAB chromogen+substrate components offered by the same vendor as the detection components, we DO purchase such a reagents from the same manufacturer simply because they’re more inclined to assist us in troubleshooting if we run into a problem with EITHER reagent. Sally On Sun, Feb 6, 2022 at 2:40 PM Hobbs, Carl via Histonet < histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu> wrote: > As I stated: > Polymer systems only work GREAT when you also use the DAB in the kit > You pay dearly for it > Check out my comparison in Histonet Images > Carl > Carl Hobbs FIBMS > Histology and Imaging Manager > Wolfson CARD > Guys Campus, London Bridge > Kings College London > London > SE1 1UL > > > > 020 7848 6810 > ___ > Histonet mailing list > Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu > http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet > -- Sally Price ___ Histonet mailing list Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
Re: [Histonet] Antibody diluent
Maria: Personally, I believe in using the right tool for the job, and have learned a lot about the science of IHC from Biocare. I recently received an email from them with a link to download a paper from their website that’s all about diluents and I found this information very useful. I would encourage others to review this information if they want to learn why using a universal reagent best option. Sally-- Sally Price ___ Histonet mailing list Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
Re: [Histonet] ADH5 multiplex procedure
-- Forwarded message -- From: "Kurth Virginia L." To: "histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu" Virginia: I’m pretty certain that the ADH5 multiplex procedure is performed at CSI Labs in the Atlanta area. And I don’t think that biocare refers to it by that name any more either - I think they just spell out all the antigens that the antibodies in this cocktail can identify, like CK-5/14+p63+CK-7/18. Sally - - - - - - - - - - - Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 14:48:40 Subject: [Histonet] ADH5 Does anyone know if there is a reference lab that performs ADH5. (particular the BioCare multiplex stain?) Thanks Ginny-- Sally Price ___ Histonet mailing list Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
Re: [Histonet] Histonet Digest, Vol 167, Issue 12
All: I beg to differ with what seems to be the general consensus, but the Dako handbook is not really representative of the available technology within the IHC field and shouldn't be thought of as a prescription for success. All the Dako book addresses is Dako's methods, reagents and instruments, which is pretty biased. In order to properly prepare for the ASCPs exam, one needs to think beyond reagents and automated systems and REALLY understand the underlying science. I've attended a number of seminars on this subject and learned that, especially because of recent changes to this test, one also needs to understand the clinical application of these procedures. More and more we're called upon to provide pathologists with support in the way of procedure validation and troubleshooting and we need to learn a great deal more than can be learned from reading one vendor's publication. +Sally ___ Histonet mailing list Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
[Histonet] South Carolina Society for Histotechnology Fall Expo
Hey folks – I'm definitely not as good at promoting a meeting as Billie Zimmerman is but I wouldn't want anyone to overlook their opportunity to participate in the SCSH's Expo, which will be held the weekend of November 4 - 6 in beautiful Pawleys Island, just a short drive north of Charleston and south of Myrtle Beach. This may be your last chance to obtain much-needed CEU's before the end of the year, unless you enjoy those boring on-line programs. For more information, please contact SCSH's President, Chad McMahan, who can be reached at < clmc...@clemson.edu >. Hope to see y'all there! -- Sally Price ___ Histonet mailing list Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
[Histonet] South Carolina Society for Histotechnology's Fall Expo
Greetings HistoNetters - In the event that you couldn't make one of the state-society meetings that were held in the Spring or the NSH Symposium/Convention just a few weeks ago, I hope you'll consider attending the South Carolina Society for Histotechnology's Fall Expo, which will be held Friday, November 4th through Sunday, November 6th at the Litchfield Beach and Golf Resort in Pawley's Island - which is right between Myrtle Beach and Charleston. Our meeting will feature nationally recognized speakers including Liz Chlipala, B.S., HTL(ASCP), former South Carolinian Joe Myers, M.S., CT(ASCP)QIHC, and Bill DeSalvo, HT(ASCP) - who are not only knowledgeable in their respective fields, but also quite entertaining...or so I'm told. For more information on this event, please contact the SCSH's President, Chad McMahan at: < clmc...@clemson.edu > Hope to see ya'll there! -- Sally Price ___ Histonet mailing list Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
Re: [Histonet] Tissue Controls (Deceptive)
Not cool Rachel. I took the survey assuming that it was intended and might help a colleage, but it's nothing but a marketing ploy, which are strongly discouraged on this forum. Original message From histonet-requ...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu Date: 06/15/2016 1:00 PM (GMT-05:00) To histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu Subject Histonet Digest, Vol 151, Issue 14 - Message: 1 Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 14:09:16 -0400 From: Rachel M GonzalezTo: "histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu" Subject: [Histonet] Tissue controls Message-ID:
[Histonet] 12ml tubes for Dako IHC stainers
Can anyone recommend a vendor for the 12ml tubes that are used on original Dako stainers other than Dako? -- Sally Price ___ Histonet mailing list Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
[Histonet] Collagen fragmentation in skin sections after heat retrieval
Our lab has been experiencing a problem recently and we could use some input on what might be causing it and what we might be able to do to prevent it. The issue is a very noticeable fragmentation of the dermal collagen within most skin specimens, which isn't visible after HE staining, but is after heat-retrieval. We think our retrieval is pretty gentle: It's performed in a veggie steamer (approx. 92oC) for 40 min, followed by 15 min colloing on the countertop before rinsing. We've tried a variety of charged slides to see if the collagen holds on better, but it doesn't. We think our processing is pretty routine as well. If it will help, I can send a photo of this phenomenon to anyone who's interested. Thanks, Sally ___ Histonet mailing list Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
[Histonet] In FL, who can perform IHC/ISH?
I realize that this is a controversial topic, bu t I'm looking for a definitive answer to the question of who can perfrom IHC and ISH in Florida. I ask this because, in addition to attempting to comply with the Federal CLIA regs governing labs, Florida has personnel licensure regs that cover our staff. So, can an ASCP-registered technician (HT, MLT) handle these procedures, or does it require a technologist (HTL, MT)? And what about unregistered/unlicensed people who work in physicians-office labs? I'm especially interested in receiving feedback from the board members of the FL Society for Histotechnology and respresentatives from the FL Department of Health's division on Clinical Lab Personnel. ___ Histonet mailing list Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
[Histonet] New KOH-type stain
Histonetters: The other day I recieved by mail a brochure for a stain in a one-gallon bottle that claimed it stained fungal elements bluish-purple and helped reading KOH's. I gave the brochure to someone and they seem to have misplaced it. It wasn't the Chicago Sky Blue stain that's in those kits (and is very expensive, 1 oz. bottles for $70). Has anyone else received this info and if so could they share the vendor/product info? Cheers, Sally ___ Histonet mailing list Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
RE: [Histonet] NCCI policy on IHC billing
Histonetters: I waited a few days to see how others might weigh in after this information was posted. Call me crazy, but I expected quite a bit more reaction from our community. How is it that such a signifcant change in how IHC testing may be conducted and will be paid for in the future can produce so little response? The way this new policy is stated, it looks pretty straightfoward: one antibody (IHC procedure) per specimen; so, when it's necessary to use a battery of IHC stains to determine the origin of an undifferentiated neoplasm, the lab can only bill for one procedure. How could such an approach be possible? And what about multi-antibody procedures, which are usually more cost effective than single-antibody procedures? Come on folks, this is a big deal becuase IHC staining is essential to to the practice of anatomic pathology and provides a lot of us with our livelihood. I know I'm not alone in thinking that the CMS needs to know that this new policy is completely impractical and must be changed. Sure, there's some unnecessary IHC procedures being performed, but this isn't the way limit the problem. Sally -- Message: 6 Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2011 12:33:17 -0600 From: Webb, Dorothy L dorothy.l.w...@healthpartners.com Subject: [Histonet] NCCI policy update To: 'histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu' Is everyone aware that beginning 1/1/12, we can no longer bill for each block regarding IHC billing, only one unit of billing for each part type no matter how many blocks are stained? Also IHC cocktail stains, such as PIN4 must now be billed as one unit even though multiple antibodies are reported out. Kind of a surprising reversal of the policy set in motion 10/1/2009. SPECIMEN becomes the unit of service rather than block(s) for IHC codes 88342, 88360, and 88361. Happy New Year to everyone out there. May 2012 find you happiness and health! Dorothy Webb, HT Regions Histology TS 651-254-2962 ___ Histonet mailing list Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
[Histonet] p53 staining in mouse tissue
Dear HistoNetters: I'm looking to identify p53 in mouse tissues and was hoping that you all might be able to recommend sources of antibodies that react well in murine tissues. Thanks, Sally ___ Histonet mailing list Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
RE: [Histonet] IHC validation
Liz: I'd like to know more about these recommendations. Could you provide a journal reference to the paper from CAP? Thx, Sally -- Message: 15 Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2011 16:19:53 -0700 From: Liz Chlipala l...@premierlab.com Subject: RE: [Histonet] IHC validation To: Weems, Joyce jwe...@sjha.org, Joe Nocito jnoc...@satx.rr.com,Histonet histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu Nope that's the recommendation for everything, in the paper they state additional development is required for prognostic markers. Once you have validated an antibody it only requires 3 tissues when you get a new lot number: 1 strong positive, 1 weak to moderate positive and 1 negative. From how I read the article its 25 tissues and then 3 tissues, it does not talk about slides so it is possible to put multiple tissues on one slide. Again these are just recommendations; I do not think that there is a set standard yet. Liz Elizabeth A. Chlipala, BS, HTL(ASCP)QIHC Manager Premier Laboratory, LLC -Original Message- From: Weems, Joyce [mailto:jwe...@sjha.org] Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2011 4:13 PM To: Liz Chlipala; Joe Nocito; Histonet Subject: RE: [Histonet] IHC validation But that is for receptors, correct? Do you do that for everything? Thanks, j -Original Message- From: histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu [mailto:histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of Liz Chlipala Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2011 17:58 To: Joe Nocito; Histonet Subject: RE: [Histonet] IHC validation Joe If you are following the recommendations from the CAP paper on IHC standardization then it would be 25 tissues (10 strong positive, 10 weak to moderate positive and 5 negative). Liz Elizabeth A. Chlipala, BS, HTL(ASCP)QIHC Manager Premier Laboratory, LLC -Original Message- From: histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu [mailto:histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of Joe Nocito Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2011 3:44 PM To: Histonet Subject: [Histonet] IHC validation Greetings Histoland, I need some help. We are about to switch IHC machines from the Richard-Allen Axiom to the Ventana Benchmark Ultra. How many slides, per antibody, do you run for the validation study? We have over 100 primary antibodies. Normally, when we work up a new antibody, we start with a titer. Once that is established, we run 10 cases to check for specificity. Hopefully we can obtain cases that are really positive, some weakly positive and some flat out negative. Once that is completed, we run 10 different tissue types to check for any unexpected cross-reactivity. The ultra holds 30 slides and we are receiving two machines. If we run 10 slides/antibody, that's going to take a while, not to mention the number of detection kits that will be used. Do you think 5 slides/antibody is sufficient? I emailed CAP last week for their take and they never returned my email (I told my medical director to hold their check for the year and see how fast they respond to that). Ah oh, don't go down that road Joe, it's unhealthy. What are your thoughts? Thanks Joe (JTT) ___ Histonet mailing list Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
RE: [Histonet] in situ - thanks 1 more query
Our anti-Dig reagent is included in Biocare's ISH detction kit. Its unlabled, but is detected with a secondary-polymer-HRP reagent that's directed at the anti-Dig primary. -- Message: 14 Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 08:46:47 +0200 From: louise renton louise.ren...@gmail.com Subject: [Histonet] in situ - thanks 1 more query To: Histonet Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu Hi all, just wanted to say thanks for all the info received. L Looking through the protocols it appears that i need an anti-DIG antibody, preferably HRP labelled - any suggestions as to supplier? I remember using one from DAKO, but don't see it in the latest catalogue. Please - any sugestions as to where I can get it? Thanks again - you guys (and gals) rock!! -- Louise Renton Bone Research Unit University of the Witwatersrand Johannesburg South Africa +27 11 717 2298 (tel fax) 073 5574456 (emergencies only) There are nights when the wolves are silent and only the moon howls. George Carlin No trees were killed in the sending of this message. However, many electrons were terribly inconvenienced. ___ Histonet mailing list Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
[Histonet] RE: Help with Biocare polymer detection kit!!
Jennifer: There are a variety possible causes for the background staining, which probably have more to do with the specimen you're attempting to stain than the detection systems, especially because you stated that you observed similar background with a biotin/avidin-based system. The first thing that comes to mind is whether or not Mach 1 is intended for use on canine/feline tissue; I suspect that its not, but you should check with Biocare's tech support to be sure. My guess is that either the immunologic enhancer reagent or antibody conjugated to the polymer-enzyme reagent is binding to endogenous immunolglobulins. Another possible cause of the background is that your tissue is over- retrieved/digested. It could also be that your antibody is not diluted adequately, or, as you suggested, the protein-blocking reagent is actually contributing to the problem. Good Luck! Sally -- Message: 1 Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2010 12:03:39 -0700 From: Jennifer Campbell jcampb...@vdxpathology.com Subject: [Histonet] Help with Biocare polymer detection kit!! To: histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu I have been trying to get the Mach 1 polymer kit from Biocare to work on my K9 and feline tissue and I am getting terrible nonspecific staining in my positive and negative controls. It appears to be sticking to something in the glands of the intestinal epithelia. I am also getting nonspecific staining in my LN tissue. I decided to switch over to polymer detection kit because I had been dealing with the issue of endogenous biotin when using the streptavidin biotin-based detection system, and now I am getting this other nonspecific staining! I have tried doing runs eliminating my protein block and eliminating the negative control and primary antibody step altogether (to see if maybe the protein block or the diluent used in my negative control and antibody dilutions are causing the problem). I have also reduced the incubation time of both the probe and polymer from 15 min and 30 min, respectively, to 10 min each. I have tried cutting down my antigen retrieval time substantially as well. I'm not sure what else could be causing this. Any suggestions?? Thanks in advance, Jennifer Campbell ___ Histonet mailing list Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
[Histonet] Best charged slides for IHC
Has anybody done a comparison of charged slides, to see which ones are best for IHC staining - espcially when slides will be pretreated in a pressure cooker? -- Sally Price ___ Histonet mailing list Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
[Histonet] RE: GI, Uro, or Derm Path Lab Set Up
...and another thing -- since when is it OK to post such blatant solicitations on the HistoNet? other vendors are chastised for this on a regular basis! Sally ___ Histonet mailing list Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
[Histonet] Ventana Her2/neu
On behalf of a colleaugue who doesn't participate in the Histonet, I'd like to ask folks if there experiencing difficulty validating their Pathyway Her2/neu antibody. My friend has tried two different lots and both are showing unusually weak staining. Just wondering if anyone else is having this issue and if you can offer some suggestions. ___ Histonet mailing list Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
[Histonet] Endogenous biotin blocking
I recently had a discussion with one of my coworkers about the need/requirement for blocking of endoegnous biotin whenever an avidin-biotin detection system is used, and I was hoping that the IHC experts on the histonet might be able to provide us with some feeback. Its been my understanding that blocking is only necessary when one is certain that background staining is caused by endogenous biotin, but maybe I'm off-base here. I look forward to eveyone's input. Sally ___ Histonet mailing list Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
RE: [Histonet] Double HRP immunostains
Andrea - We love Biocare's Bajoran Purple. It's out of this world...or it galaxy? Sally -- Message: 7 Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 14:05:41 -0400 From: Andrea Hooper anh2...@med.cornell.edu Subject: [Histonet] Double HRP immunostains To: Histonet histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu I do double HRP immunostains. Works well using DAB/AEC and True Blue... but what are your favorite chromagens to use? Would love some feedback for inspiration. Andrea -- ___ Histonet mailing list Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
RE: [Histonet] RE:Antigen retrieval paraffin skin samples
Maybe I've misinterpreted Nick's posting, but I think what he's looking for is what kinds of reagents are used for retrieving Ck antigens. It may something to do with the PFA fixation, but I'm not too sure about using ficin for CKs, We usually use other enzymes or heat. Proteinase K, or trypsin, or citrate solutions work really well in most cases. Sally -- Message: 8 Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 09:30:37 -0600 From: Sorenson, Jon (Nampa) jonsoren...@chiwest.com Subject: [Histonet] RE:Antigen retrieval paraffin skin samples To: histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu We use and like the PASCAL pressure cooker system from DAKO, it is uniform, convenient and fairly Easy to use. Jon Sorenson Histology Coordinator Mercy Medical Center jonsore...@chiwest.com 208-463-5267 -- Message: 17 Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 14:05:29 -0700 (PDT) From: Nicholas David Evans ndev...@stanford.edu Subject: [HISTONET] Antigen retrieval paraffin skin samples To: histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu Dear all, Might anyone be able to offer their advice on the best method to retrieve antigens on paraffin embedded skin sections? I am immunostaining for epithelial cytokeratins, and I have block-to-block variation in the quality of the staining - some block give consistently good staining while others giving negligible staining. The tissues were prepared by fixation in 4% PFA for 24 - 48 hours followed by dehydration and embedding. I currently use 15 mins Ficin digestion. I suspect that the differences may be accounted for by variability in the length of time samples were fixed in PFA and then 70% ethanol. Best wishes Nick ___ Histonet mailing list Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
RE: [Histonet] immunohistochemistry
Hatem: Since this info hasn't already been offered, I'd suggest that you considering using a 'programmable' water bath or pressure cooker -- where the temperature is reduced to 65 to 75 degrees, but the exposure time extended to three to six hours. Sally --- Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 20:01:50 -0700 (PDT) From: Hatem Salim dr.hatemsa...@yahoo.com Subject: [Histonet] immunohistochemistry To: histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu HI I am Research assistant at Physiology department of Michigan state university. I am using the (ß-Catenin Antibody (Carboxy-terminal Antigen) #9587 for IHC on mice femur sections. I have used this antigen unmasking method: For Citrate: Bring slides to a boil in 10 mM sodium citrate buffer pH 6.0 then maintain at a sub-boiling temperature for 10 minutes. Cool slides on bench top for 30 minutes. The problem is that bone detachment always occurs so I wonder if there is a method of retrieval that prevents bone detachment. Waiting to hear from you soon. Thank you for your consideration Best wishes Hatem Salim ___ Histonet mailing list Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
[Histonet] Need refurbished HE stainer
Fellow 'Netters: I'm helping a friend set up a new lab and they'd like to get a refurbished HE stainer. Any suggestions, including likely price range, will be greatly appreciated. The lab's located in Ohio, if that makes a difference to potential sellers. Thx, Sally ___ Histonet mailing list Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
RE: [Histonet] New Dako IHC Instrument and T.P.I.D.
Beth: I evaluated the AS-Link/TPID and wasn't too impressed. Its the same basic machine with a new outside/skin and the only difference is that in can read barcode labels on the reagents. To me, the postive-ID part should be handles by the LIS, not the staining system. One part of the deal that really concerned me is that Dako is pushing a new detectionsystem called Flex, which costs a lot more than Envision plus. And they want to bill our lab on a per-slide basis, which seems fishy to me. Ican send you my cost analysis if you want. Next stop: Biocare's intellipath. Sally -Original Message- From: histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu [mailto: histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of Fye Beth Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 12:35 PM To: histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu Subject: [Histonet] New Dako IHC Instrument and T.P.I.D. I'm curious if anyone out there has any feedback or comments on the new Dako IHC Instrument, Autostainer Link 48 and/or their TPID (True Positive ID). We are in desparate need of replacing our current DAKO instruments, and are probably going to stick with DAKO again after looking at several other instruments. I just thought I check to see if anyone using it has anything to say. Beth ___ Histonet mailing list Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
[Histonet] RE: Dako and Leica immunostainers
All, After reading this thread I just had offer my comments. I'm not a big fan of systems that do the dewax and AR, primarily because it costs way too much to automate these steps. I've never used the Bond, but I hear that you've gotta put some plastic thingy - that probably costs too much - on top of each slide, you gotta use their detection reagents - which probably cost more than other companies, they charge you for empty barcoded reagent containers, all the slides in the same tray have to use the same detection reagents - which means that the continuous-feed feature has some serious limits, it can't do double-stains, and they have less than 50 IVD-approved antbodies. Can someone verify for me if all this issues are true? If so, why would someone want one of these stainers? The Dako stainer is a dinosaur and with all the newre/better ones available, they should probably take it off the market. Cheers, Sally -Original Message- From: Josie Britton [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Michael Bradley [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu Sent: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 11:31 am Subject: RE: [Histonet] Dako Hi, We just got the new Bond Max IHC stainer and we love it. You just cut the slides dry them and place them on the Bond. It does retrieval, antibody staining, and counter stain. You just dehydrate , clear, and mount your coverslip. It is easy to use. It has 3 individual slide tray's of 10. You can load more slides on the empty tray's and start a new batch while the others are running. We run into the pathologist's adding more antibodies to the list an hour after we have run the first batch frequently, so this feature is great. When you add more IHC's the run time on all the slide tray's run times do increase, but it's better than having to wait another 2-3 hours to put your next set of immuno's on. Hope this helps! Josie Britton HT Cheshire Medical Center 580 Court Street Keene, NH 03431 -Original Message- Message: 9 Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 17:17:52 -0500 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Histonet] Dako To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu Just another FYI... The Biocare IntelliPath does the same thing, but has 4 trays of 10 and it allows you to make one of the trays?RUSH.? SO depending, on the volume?of IHC you do either of these machines would work out great. Roxanne ___ Histonet mailing list Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet