RE: [hlds] DoD
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. -- What kernel version are you using ? Ransom -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Tony Sent: Wed 10/11/2004 09:31 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: [hlds] DoD This is a multi-part message in MIME format. -- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] Can anyone offer any advice on Running DoD Server is 24 player hosted 2.8GHz P4 with 1024 DDR 3200 running Linux RH9 all is great till 20 players are on the server then CPU flys through the roof, I'va not had much dealing with DoD, I beleave it is a tad haevy on CPU but it's runs fine untill server get nearly full any info would be a great help -- ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds -- [ winmail.dat of type application/ms-tnef deleted ] -- ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
RE: [hlds] Linux server, Advice
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. -- We upgraded 2 of our servers from redhat 9 to fedora core 2 42 days ago, uptime on both systems is 42 days not 1 reboot since installation! Havent had any stability issues whatsoever, and 1 box has survived 2 heavy dos attacks. Running kernel version 2.6.6-1.435 on both machines, both AMD xp2600 singles. The constant stream of security updates is also very nice and the up2date utility ensures you stay as patched as possible, not sure if other linux distro's have such a good path to receive updates and security fixes. Neil. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Matt White Sent: Wed 28/07/2004 17:55 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: RE: [hlds] Linux server, Advice I have heard gentoo linux is a good one. Regards, Matt White [ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve! Sent: 28 July 2004 09:37 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [hlds] Linux server, Advice This is a multi-part message in MIME format. -- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] Okay, am sick of 'strange' behaviour on windoze server, I can get it running, is fine, then 'something' changes... So.. Which flavour of Linux might be best to install? I need to run HLDS, also a webserver, and it has to support wireless cards, and preferably filesharing... Don't really need a GUI (altho some kind of www browser would be nice), just want a nice clean tight *STABLE* OS I'm currently looking at installing www.whiteboxlinux.org anyone got much experience? Steve! -- ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds -- [ winmail.dat of type application/ms-tnef deleted ] -- ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
RE: [hlds] RE: AMD vs Intel.
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. -- Even the 2.67 P4 is doing better, in terms of clock speed it is only a little faster than one of the chips, but this is a dual, if we look at amd's naming system then 2400+ should as you say be eqivilant to a p4 2.4, but im just not seeing the performance especially considering it has an extra chip over the p4's. Neil. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of List Keeper Sent: Wed 28/07/2004 17:54 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: Re: [hlds] RE: AMD vs Intel. Also it should be noted that the 2400+ was only meant to be compete with a 2.4 GHz Intel CPU, not the 2.8 or 3.0 GHz that you are using. - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 11:31 AM Subject: RE: [hlds] RE: AMD vs Intel. This is a multi-part message in MIME format. -- Well to be fair the P4's are all 800FSB, using PC400 ram. Compared to the mp2400's which only run PC2100 ram, and the fsb is 266. Both CPU's are being used, and on my original test both cpu's were at 100% on the dual. I agree that 2 single chip systems compared to a dual, will generally bring more performance (in my case a p4 3ghz and a p4 2.8ghz), but at the moment i have my p4 3ghz outperforming my dual by nearly double in terms of cpu usage. Which just seems odd. I will be doing some more testing this evening to get the p4 under really heavy load and see how the ingame playability differs between the dual and the p4. I will be attempting to get 60+ people on the p4 this eve spread over some big servers, ill report back the results. The 2400's are thoroughbred. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of David Fencik Sent: Wed 28/07/2004 17:21 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: RE: [hlds] RE: AMD vs Intel. We need to get back to the original focus of this thread. Was the chipset on the amd boards specified? It wouldn't be fair if you were comparing a P4 with DDR 333 to an Athlon mp with DDR 233, would it? I'm just saying that there are other parts of the machine to consider besides the processor speed. Also...2 single processor machines are superior to 1 dual processor machine in overall cpu usage. Mapchange, however, is a different story. This may sound silly, but have you verified that both cpus are being used by the operating system by looking for two processors in the task manager? I am not loyal to either brand. I have both brands of chips and I realize that both intel and amd have made some good and some bad ones. Are your 2400's thoroughbred or barton cores? Dave -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of K. Mike Bradley Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 11:22 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [hlds] RE: AMD vs Intel. Each process will only run on separate CPU if you set the apps processor affinity. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Maarten van der Zwaart Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 7:03 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [hlds] RE: AMD vs Intel. On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 08:18:11 +0100, Mark Duffy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dumb question but does the software (mods and game) actually support > multi processors? Yes, meaning they will run on such a system. But each HLDS instance will only run on one processor. Maarten -- A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail? ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds -- [ winmail.dat of type application/ms-tnef deleted ] -- ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
RE: [hlds] RE: AMD vs Intel.
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. -- Well to be fair the P4's are all 800FSB, using PC400 ram. Compared to the mp2400's which only run PC2100 ram, and the fsb is 266. Both CPU's are being used, and on my original test both cpu's were at 100% on the dual. I agree that 2 single chip systems compared to a dual, will generally bring more performance (in my case a p4 3ghz and a p4 2.8ghz), but at the moment i have my p4 3ghz outperforming my dual by nearly double in terms of cpu usage. Which just seems odd. I will be doing some more testing this evening to get the p4 under really heavy load and see how the ingame playability differs between the dual and the p4. I will be attempting to get 60+ people on the p4 this eve spread over some big servers, ill report back the results. The 2400's are thoroughbred. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of David Fencik Sent: Wed 28/07/2004 17:21 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: RE: [hlds] RE: AMD vs Intel. We need to get back to the original focus of this thread. Was the chipset on the amd boards specified? It wouldn't be fair if you were comparing a P4 with DDR 333 to an Athlon mp with DDR 233, would it? I'm just saying that there are other parts of the machine to consider besides the processor speed. Also...2 single processor machines are superior to 1 dual processor machine in overall cpu usage. Mapchange, however, is a different story. This may sound silly, but have you verified that both cpus are being used by the operating system by looking for two processors in the task manager? I am not loyal to either brand. I have both brands of chips and I realize that both intel and amd have made some good and some bad ones. Are your 2400's thoroughbred or barton cores? Dave -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of K. Mike Bradley Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 11:22 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [hlds] RE: AMD vs Intel. Each process will only run on separate CPU if you set the apps processor affinity. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Maarten van der Zwaart Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 7:03 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [hlds] RE: AMD vs Intel. On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 08:18:11 +0100, Mark Duffy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dumb question but does the software (mods and game) actually support > multi processors? Yes, meaning they will run on such a system. But each HLDS instance will only run on one processor. Maarten -- A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail? ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds -- [ winmail.dat of type application/ms-tnef deleted ] -- ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
RE: [hlds] RE: AMD vs Intel.
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. -- lol. Im agreeing with you, this is how it used to work when we first started using these duals a year ago (still under windows), we allow each hlds to use both cpu's and let the windows scheduler take care of it. However im not arguing that, im just pointing out/ asking for input on why im getting my single P4 systems out performing my mp2400+ duals. On paper the duals should be much faster than the P4's, but in reality its just not happening (see specs of player slots on original post) Neil. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of K. Mike Bradley Sent: Wed 28/07/2004 16:21 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: RE: [hlds] RE: AMD vs Intel. HLDS WILL see and advantage with multi processor WILL WILL WILL WILL ,, How many times do I have to explain this common misconception? Even if HLDS.exe runs a single thread ... There are OS threads supporting applications function calls In the background which means Being able to run two threads simultaneously will make HL run mo better -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 6:58 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [hlds] RE: AMD vs Intel. This is a multi-part message in MIME format. -- hlsd isnt coded to be multithreaded so wont see any advantage with having 2 cpus available, but because we are running more than 2 process on each box, the os is able to scedule the invdividual load between the 2 chips. Neil. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Mark DuffySent: Wed 28/07/2004 08:18 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: [hlds] RE: AMD vs Intel. Dumb question but does the software (mods and game) actually support multi processors? Just a thought mark duffy ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds -- [ winmail.dat of type application/ms-tnef deleted ] -- ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds -- [ winmail.dat of type application/ms-tnef deleted ] -- ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
RE: [hlds] AMD vs Intel.
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. -- At this point I dont really want to invest in any more AMD hardware, especially as most of the boards for the duals operate on the same chipset afaik. With the p4's we have an asus board running with the springdale chipset, and also a gigabyte with an sis chipset and they both run more player slots. Neil. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Richard Welsh Sent: Wed 28/07/2004 06:02 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: Re: [hlds] AMD vs Intel. -- -- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] This simple get the best AMD board and the best P4 board... get Corsair Ram and test... if ya don't you lose. ---Original Message--- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 07/27/04 19:22:53 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [hlds] AMD vs Intel. This is a multi-part message in MIME format. -- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] Hiya, I donât want to start a big flame, but im just really puzzled, this has been niggling away for the last few weeks and I thought id see if anyone else has any thoughts or experiences that may help. Basically the servers in question are these: 3x dual amd mp 2400's, 1.5gb ram. 3x p4's 1gb ram, 3ghz, 2.8ghz and a 2.67ghz. The p4 singles seem to be running circles around the duals, ive performed several tests getting the boxes as full as possible. Dual mp 2400: 52 players, spread across 4 servers. 12man, 20man, 12man, 18man. The 20man and 18man are running metamod 1.17 and amx 0.9.7, and vac. The other 2 servers are just running vac. With this setup the cpu load is at 100% constant. P4 3Ghz: 35players, spread across 2 servers. 14man, 20man, 12man. The 20man is full running metamod 1.17 and clanmod 1.82b1 and vac. The other 2 servers are running metamod 1.17 and amx 0.9.7, and vac With this setup the cpu load is at 30-42% All servers were running the same map. As a cross reference the server on the p4 (20man) was using 20-25%. The 20man on the AMD dual was using 40-45% of total system cpu. I need to do further testing on this to get more extensive figures, but from early investigations despite having 2 cpu's each clocked at 2ghz (from memory), against a 3ghz single chip its being run circles around. IF the p4 figure are to go by, if I was happy with 100% cpu load, then I could have 70-80 players running off this box to get the same cpu useage as 52players on the dual! Now, the other duals are all having a similar story, the p4's are doing exceptionally well, even the 2.67 seems to be able to support more players than the dual. What do the rest of you think ? --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.728 / Virus Database: 483 - Release Date: 27/07/2004 -- ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds -- [ IMSTP.gif of type image/gif deleted ] -- [ BackGrnd.jpg of type image/jpeg deleted ] -- ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds -- [ winmail.dat of type application/ms-tnef deleted ] -- ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
RE: [hlds] RE: AMD vs Intel.
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. -- hlsd isnt coded to be multithreaded so wont see any advantage with having 2 cpus available, but because we are running more than 2 process on each box, the os is able to scedule the invdividual load between the 2 chips. Neil. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Mark Duffy Sent: Wed 28/07/2004 08:18 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: [hlds] RE: AMD vs Intel. Dumb question but does the software (mods and game) actually support multi processors? Just a thought mark duffy ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds -- [ winmail.dat of type application/ms-tnef deleted ] -- ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
RE: [hlds] AMD vs Intel.
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. -- lol -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Philipp G. Sent: Wed 28/07/2004 02:01 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: RE: [hlds] AMD vs Intel. too late, I called dibs >From: "John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: RE: [hlds] AMD vs Intel. >Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 19:18:52 -0500 > >Do you need a son? > >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Neil Cumming >Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2004 6:19 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: [hlds] AMD vs Intel. > >This is a multi-part message in MIME format. >-- >[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] >Hiya, > >I don't want to start a big flame, but im just really puzzled, this has >been >niggling away for the last few weeks and I thought id see if anyone else >has >any thoughts or experiences that may help. > >Basically the servers in question are these: > >3x dual amd mp 2400's, 1.5gb ram. > >3x p4's 1gb ram, 3ghz, 2.8ghz and a 2.67ghz. > >The p4 singles seem to be running circles around the duals, ive performed >several tests getting the boxes as full as possible. > >Dual mp 2400: 52 players, spread across 4 servers. 12man, 20man, 12man, >18man. > >The 20man and 18man are running metamod 1.17 and amx 0.9.7, and vac. The >other 2 servers are just running vac. > >With this setup the cpu load is at 100% constant. > >P4 3Ghz: 35players, spread across 2 servers. 14man, 20man, 12man. > >The 20man is full running metamod 1.17 and clanmod 1.82b1 and vac. The >other >2 servers are running metamod 1.17 and amx 0.9.7, and vac > >With this setup the cpu load is at 30-42% > >All servers were running the same map. As a cross reference the server on >the p4 (20man) was using 20-25%. The 20man on the AMD dual was using 40-45% >of total system cpu. > >I need to do further testing on this to get more extensive figures, but >from >early investigations despite having 2 cpu's each clocked at 2ghz (from >memory), against a 3ghz single chip its being run circles around. IF the p4 >figure are to go by, if I was happy with 100% cpu load, then I could have >70-80 players running off this box to get the same cpu useage as 52players >on the dual! > >Now, the other duals are all having a similar story, the p4's are doing >exceptionally well, even the 2.67 seems to be able to support more players >than the dual. > >What do the rest of you think ? > > >--- >Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. >Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). >Version: 6.0.728 / Virus Database: 483 - Release Date: 27/07/2004 > >-- > > >___ >To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, >please visit: >http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds > >--- >Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. >Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). >Version: 6.0.727 / Virus Database: 482 - Release Date: 7/26/2004 > > > >___ >To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, >please visit: >http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds _ Share a single photo or an entire photo slide show right inside MSNÂ Messenger. http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-ca&page=byoa/prem&xAPID=1994&DI=1034&SU=http://hotmail.com/enca&HL=Market_MSNIS_Taglines Start enjoying all the benefits of MSNÂ Premium right now and get the first two months FREE*. ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds -- [ winmail.dat of type application/ms-tnef deleted ] -- ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
RE: [hlds] AMD vs Intel.
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. -- Windows 2000 pro on all of them. Neil. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of GreyFox Sent: Wed 28/07/2004 00:55 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: Re: [hlds] AMD vs Intel. Neil Cumming wrote: >Hiya, > >I donât want to start a big flame, but im just really puzzled, this has been >niggling away for the last few weeks and I thought id see if anyone else has >any thoughts or experiences that may help. > >Basically the servers in question are these: > >3x dual amd mp 2400's, 1.5gb ram. > >3x p4's 1gb ram, 3ghz, 2.8ghz and a 2.67ghz. > >The p4 singles seem to be running circles around the duals, ive performed >several tests getting the boxes as full as possible. > > [..snip...] What operating system are you running on those machines? ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds -- [ winmail.dat of type application/ms-tnef deleted ] -- ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
RE: [hlds] AMD vs Intel.
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. -- No. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of John Sent: Wed 28/07/2004 01:18 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: RE: [hlds] AMD vs Intel. Do you need a son? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Neil Cumming Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2004 6:19 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [hlds] AMD vs Intel. This is a multi-part message in MIME format. -- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] Hiya, I don't want to start a big flame, but im just really puzzled, this has been niggling away for the last few weeks and I thought id see if anyone else has any thoughts or experiences that may help. Basically the servers in question are these: 3x dual amd mp 2400's, 1.5gb ram. 3x p4's 1gb ram, 3ghz, 2.8ghz and a 2.67ghz. The p4 singles seem to be running circles around the duals, ive performed several tests getting the boxes as full as possible. Dual mp 2400: 52 players, spread across 4 servers. 12man, 20man, 12man, 18man. The 20man and 18man are running metamod 1.17 and amx 0.9.7, and vac. The other 2 servers are just running vac. With this setup the cpu load is at 100% constant. P4 3Ghz: 35players, spread across 2 servers. 14man, 20man, 12man. The 20man is full running metamod 1.17 and clanmod 1.82b1 and vac. The other 2 servers are running metamod 1.17 and amx 0.9.7, and vac With this setup the cpu load is at 30-42% All servers were running the same map. As a cross reference the server on the p4 (20man) was using 20-25%. The 20man on the AMD dual was using 40-45% of total system cpu. I need to do further testing on this to get more extensive figures, but from early investigations despite having 2 cpu's each clocked at 2ghz (from memory), against a 3ghz single chip its being run circles around. IF the p4 figure are to go by, if I was happy with 100% cpu load, then I could have 70-80 players running off this box to get the same cpu useage as 52players on the dual! Now, the other duals are all having a similar story, the p4's are doing exceptionally well, even the 2.67 seems to be able to support more players than the dual. What do the rest of you think ? --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.728 / Virus Database: 483 - Release Date: 27/07/2004 -- ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.727 / Virus Database: 482 - Release Date: 7/26/2004 ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds -- [ winmail.dat of type application/ms-tnef deleted ] -- ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
RE: [hlds] Lag issue since update?
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. -- So far I have only updated 2 servers, and noticed this as well, watching through hlsw is most apparent because of the huge red blocks that appear at regular intervals, whilst a ping -t shows all is happy. /me holds of updating the rest of the servers. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Williams, Paul Sent: Tue 15/06/2004 21:30 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: [hlds] Lag issue since update? Right, before I start to investigate this problem I thought I'd check first to see if anyone else is having this issue. My servers are suffering periodic sessions of major lag since the latest updates. Is anyone else noticing this? Running a ping -t to the servers whilst this lag is happening indicates that all is well with the servers. Cheers, Paul ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds -- [ winmail.dat of type application/ms-tnef deleted ] -- ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
