This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--
Well to be fair the P4's are all 800FSB, using PC400 ram. Compared to the mp2400's 
which only run PC2100 ram, and the fsb is 266.
Both CPU's are being used, and on my original test both cpu's were at 100% on the dual.
I agree that 2 single chip systems compared to a dual, will generally bring more 
performance (in my case a p4 3ghz and a p4 2.8ghz), but at the moment  i have my p4 
3ghz outperforming my dual by nearly double in terms of cpu usage. Which just seems 
odd. I will be doing some more testing this evening to get the p4 under really heavy 
load and see how the ingame playability differs between the dual and the p4. I will be 
attempting to  get 60+  people on the p4 this eve spread over some big servers, ill 
report back the results.
The 2400's are thoroughbred.

        -----Original Message-----
        From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of David Fencik
        Sent: Wed 28/07/2004 17:21
        To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        Cc:
        Subject: RE: [hlds] RE: AMD vs Intel.



        We need to get back to the original focus of this thread.  Was the
        chipset on the amd boards specified?

        It wouldn't be fair if you were comparing a P4 with DDR 333 to an Athlon
        mp with DDR 233, would it?  I'm just saying that there are other parts
        of the machine to consider besides the processor speed.

        Also...2 single processor machines are superior to 1 dual processor
        machine in overall cpu usage.  Mapchange, however, is a different story.

        This may sound silly, but have you verified that both cpus are being
        used by the operating system by looking for two processors in the task
        manager?

        I am not loyal to either brand.  I have both brands of chips and I
        realize that both intel and amd have made some good and some bad ones.

        Are your 2400's thoroughbred or barton cores?

        Dave

        -----Original Message-----
        From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of K. Mike Bradley
        Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 11:22 AM
        To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        Subject: RE: [hlds] RE: AMD vs Intel.

        Each process will only run on separate CPU if you set the apps processor
        affinity.

        -----Original Message-----
        From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Maarten van der
        Zwaart
        Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 7:03 AM
        To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        Subject: Re: [hlds] RE: AMD vs Intel.

        On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 08:18:11 +0100, Mark Duffy
        <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
        wrote:

        > Dumb question but does the software (mods and game) actually support
        > multi processors?????

        Yes, meaning they will run on such a system. But each HLDS instance will
        only run on one processor.

        Maarten

        --
        A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text.
        Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
        A: Top-posting.
        Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?


        _______________________________________________
        To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
        please visit:
        http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds


        _______________________________________________
        To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
        please visit:
        http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds



        _______________________________________________
        To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please 
visit:
        http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds




--
[ winmail.dat of type application/ms-tnef deleted ]
--

_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds

Reply via email to