RE: PB issue-why dont we let this die?
Hey guys, my 'boycott' suggestion only had one purpose, and the suggestion was made kinda tongue in cheek anway. I didn't think anyone would take it all that seriously. The only reason I suggested it was to get Valve to respond to the major question: Are they anti cheat, and are they going to support PB, or make anti-cheat a higher priority? We were all left wondering what Valve's position is, as there was no information forthcoming. Again, the only reason I suggested what I did was to extract a comment from Valve about this current high-priority issue. Now that Erik J has responded, I think the whole boycott thing is dead, and should be. StanTheMan TheHardwareFreak www.hardwarefreak.devastation.cc [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Ryan McCullough [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001 12:46 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: PB issue-why dont we let this die? Uh, why are we still talking about this? Erik gave his reply, we have heard what PB has to say. If you choose to boycott and shutdown your server in favor of something else that is your perogative. The problem is this whole PB thread(s) have grown too large and are going in circles. We will get new information when it is available. If you do not like the way either party has handled things, there are plenty of other games out there dying for servers. Basically stop whining about something that we have very little control of. It is now out of our hands. -Original Message- From: Ronin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001 9:56 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: PB issue non-response from Valve. Shut all our serversdowntoboycott? And I'm surprised that you could be so narrow minded. Sad...very very sad. What I've done at my level doesn't concern you. I've worked with CS before you knew it was a mod. So, since you're so nitpicky today, let's reverse the role: ---For starters, most of the 3rd party developers with major projects (not the simple scripts) are not little kids and we're not asking for money. I still haven't read anywhere from Tony that he was after money. This is nothing but an assumption and interpretation of his news post.-- Not an assumption. Take a look at his post. Business venture, company name...a bit of deductive reason would show the simplest mind what this is about. --- That's unfortunate, because HLDS still has issues from versions back that still need addressing. I'd rather see quicker patch releases with fixes than longer patch releases with new features and a new slew of bugs. If a boycott campaign were initiated, I doubt that it would just be with this list. There are many ways to reach the server admins out there. Heck, we could always just run HLDS and AdminMOD, set the # of users to 1. Then, set a MOTD to display as the player is connecting. Set the mp_timelimit to 5. Then renmae the hostname to something like Valve Boycott (url). I suppose that the AdminMOD is optional. That may be a better way than just shutting down the server. It'll provide more information to both the players and other admins.-- You could wish to see anything you wanted to. The fact is, Valve has supported this game and HLDS LONG after it's release, when it didn't need to. You're not respecting the effort and time that's been put forth, and it's sad...again...very very sad. You're taking this me me me attitude when the last time I saw that happen I think I was 4 years old myself. -- I think that you're missing the overall issue here. Although, I don't have all of the facts regarding PB's issues, based on past experiences, I do know the typical reaction of Valve to help out 3rd Party developers, or even the MOD developers and mappers. It is the fundamental principle of Valve not helping or implementing the requested fixes and features that their clients request. Also, the priorities are a little shifted. Another silence isn't going to help their reputation either. I don't know how much development you have done with the SDK. But, Ronin, running an information site like UA or counter-server is a completely different realm. It is a lot easier.-- Since when do you know fundamental principle of Valve? Did you get hired there? Are you their marketing/pr person? Give me a break. If you'd like to talk about assumptions, friend, there's one staring you in the face. Again, I see here a selfish attitude that says I want it and I want it NOW. How about YOU make something like HL and do what Valve has done. I didn't think soand as far as 'just running an information site'..more assumption. Again, you have no clue what I do, nor have done. Simply because my name is attached to Counter-Server doesn't mean jack, but it certainly implies some things that a closed mind might not see. -- Those are some pretty ignorant and lame comments
RE: PB issue-why dont we let this die?
Uh, why are we still talking about this? Erik gave his reply, we have heard what PB has to say. If you choose to boycott and shutdown your server in favor of something else that is your perogative. The problem is this whole PB thread(s) have grown too large and are going in circles. We will get new information when it is available. If you do not like the way either party has handled things, there are plenty of other games out there dying for servers. Basically stop whining about something that we have very little control of. It is now out of our hands. -Original Message- From: Ronin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001 9:56 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: PB issue non-response from Valve. Shut all our serversdowntoboycott? And I'm surprised that you could be so narrow minded. Sad...very very sad. What I've done at my level doesn't concern you. I've worked with CS before you knew it was a mod. So, since you're so nitpicky today, let's reverse the role: ---For starters, most of the 3rd party developers with major projects (not the simple scripts) are not little kids and we're not asking for money. I still haven't read anywhere from Tony that he was after money. This is nothing but an assumption and interpretation of his news post.-- Not an assumption. Take a look at his post. Business venture, company name...a bit of deductive reason would show the simplest mind what this is about. --- That's unfortunate, because HLDS still has issues from versions back that still need addressing. I'd rather see quicker patch releases with fixes than longer patch releases with new features and a new slew of bugs. If a boycott campaign were initiated, I doubt that it would just be with this list. There are many ways to reach the server admins out there. Heck, we could always just run HLDS and AdminMOD, set the # of users to 1. Then, set a MOTD to display as the player is connecting. Set the mp_timelimit to 5. Then renmae the hostname to something like Valve Boycott (url). I suppose that the AdminMOD is optional. That may be a better way than just shutting down the server. It'll provide more information to both the players and other admins.-- You could wish to see anything you wanted to. The fact is, Valve has supported this game and HLDS LONG after it's release, when it didn't need to. You're not respecting the effort and time that's been put forth, and it's sad...again...very very sad. You're taking this me me me attitude when the last time I saw that happen I think I was 4 years old myself. -- I think that you're missing the overall issue here. Although, I don't have all of the facts regarding PB's issues, based on past experiences, I do know the typical reaction of Valve to help out 3rd Party developers, or even the MOD developers and mappers. It is the fundamental principle of Valve not helping or implementing the requested fixes and features that their clients request. Also, the priorities are a little shifted. Another silence isn't going to help their reputation either. I don't know how much development you have done with the SDK. But, Ronin, running an information site like UA or counter-server is a completely different realm. It is a lot easier.-- Since when do you know fundamental principle of Valve? Did you get hired there? Are you their marketing/pr person? Give me a break. If you'd like to talk about assumptions, friend, there's one staring you in the face. Again, I see here a selfish attitude that says I want it and I want it NOW. How about YOU make something like HL and do what Valve has done. I didn't think soand as far as 'just running an information site'..more assumption. Again, you have no clue what I do, nor have done. Simply because my name is attached to Counter-Server doesn't mean jack, but it certainly implies some things that a closed mind might not see. -- Those are some pretty ignorant and lame comments there. I was actually a little surprised that you said them. =\ -- I spoke the truth. This list has become ridiculous. People here think there is some sort of democracy going on here, and that they are the Gods of the Server world with CS/HL/TFC/DoD or whatever else they host. You are the MINORITY here. I don't know how hard it is to understand that, but it's the plain and simple truth. I'm horrified that someone even proposed the boycott idea, and to be honest, it's not the first time. So, about running information sites? Go back and run yours, please. Ryan Ronin Antonelli Counter-Server Site Administrator http://server.counter-strike.net -Original Message- From: HoundDawg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001 8:06 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: PB issue non-response from Valve. Shut all our serversdowntoboycott? - Original Message - From: Ronin [EMAIL PROTECTED] You know what this sounds like? A bunch of kids who aren't getting their way. You are
