RE: [hlds_linux] some CVar's - and Anticheat
The "S" are for statsme. I don't think we know what they are yet. The _ah is for autohelp, the annoying text that pops up now and again. And VGUI_MENUS are for the pretty, graphical mouse-driven menus (Think, buy menu) rather than the plain text ones. - Tyler "[TASF]Overkill" Schwend "Semper facere bonum, an a amare odium, vita mors." --- Server operator of [LCGA]Telefragged: Counter-Strike: telefragged.lynchburg.edu:27015 http://schwend-t.web.lynchburg.edu > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Behalf Of Simon > Thomasen > Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 12:22 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [hlds_linux] some CVar's - and Anticheat > > > I have 2 questions for the crowd: > > 1) How well does VAC and HLGuard work together? Is it > advisable? > > 2) On my CS server, I some times see people (not dead > people) with CVAR's > that I don't have myself. > Can you guys help my identify them? > These are (CVAR names and values): > > s3 67108863 > s2 67108863 > s 67108863 > _ah 1 > vgui_menus 0 > > Thanks > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view > the list archives, please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
[hlds_linux] some CVar's - and Anticheat
I have 2 questions for the crowd: 1) How well does VAC and HLGuard work together? Is it advisable? 2) On my CS server, I some times see people (not dead people) with CVAR's that I don't have myself. Can you guys help my identify them? These are (CVAR names and values): s3 67108863 s2 67108863 s 67108863 _ah 1 vgui_menus0 Thanks [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
RE: [hlds_linux] Servers
->-Original Message- ->From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ->[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Oscar N aka ->'Dreadful' ->Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 12:08 PM ->To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ->Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Servers -> -> ->But that should hardly be the problem. eepro100 works great, the only ->difference I noticed is that e100 had some more features... ->/Oscar oh, I agree, I doubt its the issue ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] Servers
But that should hardly be the problem. eepro100 works great, the only difference I noticed is that e100 had some more features... /Oscar Kevin J. Anderson wrote: you could also try intel's own new linux driver, e100. It seems to do very well from my tests. Ive moved away from eepro100 on all of my boxes. kev ->-Original Message- ->From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ->[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Michael ->Madsen ->Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 11:28 AM ->To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ->Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Servers -> -> ->Hehe ok. Sorry for being a pain in the ass :o) -> ->I'll go for the 2.49 and see where it takes me. Thanks for your ->time for the being :) -> ->Michael -> ->*** REPLY SEPARATOR *** -> ->On 25-03-2003 at 17:22 Oscar N aka 'Dreadful' wrote: -> ->>This is what we are saying... Kernel versions after 2.4.9 are wierd... ->>Try the one we suggested and find out this yourself, no idea in us ->>speculation any more before you've tried that... ->> ->>/Oscar ->> -> -> ->___ ->To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list ->archives, please visit: ->http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
RE: [hlds_linux] Servers
you could also try intel's own new linux driver, e100. It seems to do very well from my tests. Ive moved away from eepro100 on all of my boxes. kev ->-Original Message- ->From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ->[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Michael ->Madsen ->Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 11:28 AM ->To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ->Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Servers -> -> ->Hehe ok. Sorry for being a pain in the ass :o) -> ->I'll go for the 2.49 and see where it takes me. Thanks for your ->time for the being :) -> ->Michael -> ->*** REPLY SEPARATOR *** -> ->On 25-03-2003 at 17:22 Oscar N aka 'Dreadful' wrote: -> ->>This is what we are saying... Kernel versions after 2.4.9 are wierd... ->>Try the one we suggested and find out this yourself, no idea in us ->>speculation any more before you've tried that... ->> ->>/Oscar ->> -> -> ->___ ->To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list ->archives, please visit: ->http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] Servers
Hehe ok. Sorry for being a pain in the ass :o) I'll go for the 2.49 and see where it takes me. Thanks for your time for the being :) Michael *** REPLY SEPARATOR *** On 25-03-2003 at 17:22 Oscar N aka 'Dreadful' wrote: >This is what we are saying... Kernel versions after 2.4.9 are wierd... >Try the one we suggested and find out this yourself, no idea in us >speculation any more before you've tried that... > >/Oscar > ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] Servers
This is what we are saying... Kernel versions after 2.4.9 are wierd... Try the one we suggested and find out this yourself, no idea in us speculation any more before you've tried that... /Oscar Michael Madsen wrote: I'm at this moment running two servers. 1. Runnning de_dust 16/16 = <1% cpu usage 2. Running cs_estate 13/15 = 40% cpu 3. Running de_aztec 10/12 = <1% cpu Then the players on #3 is dropping out and the CPU usage for #2 is <1% again. It's really freaking me out, because I don't know what to look for. Could it be NIC-drivers which causes this, because it can't keep up with the packets? I'm using eepro100.c:v1.26 11/17/2002 drivers with my 82557/8/9? Or is it really the kernel which is screwing it up? Michael *** REPLY SEPARATOR *** On 25-03-2003 at 16:19 Michael Madsen wrote: *** REPLY SEPARATOR *** On 25-03-2003 at 09:50 Kevin J. Anderson wrote: I would imagine it has to do w/ overhead due to changes/improvements to the kernel. I think around 2.4.9 they redid the VM and continued tweaking it afterwards? So you think I'd be better of with the 2.4.9 or have they fixed something after 2.4.17, so my 2.4.20 is alright? Michael ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] Servers
Go with 2.4.9... all newer version has the "bug"... /Oscar Michael Madsen wrote: *** REPLY SEPARATOR *** On 25-03-2003 at 09:50 Kevin J. Anderson wrote: I would imagine it has to do w/ overhead due to changes/improvements to the kernel. I think around 2.4.9 they redid the VM and continued tweaking it afterwards? So you think I'd be better of with the 2.4.9 or have they fixed something after 2.4.17, so my 2.4.20 is alright? Michael ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
RE: [hlds_linux] Servers
I'm at this moment running two servers. 1. Runnning de_dust 16/16 = <1% cpu usage 2. Running cs_estate 13/15 = 40% cpu 3. Running de_aztec 10/12 = <1% cpu Then the players on #3 is dropping out and the CPU usage for #2 is <1% again. It's really freaking me out, because I don't know what to look for. Could it be NIC-drivers which causes this, because it can't keep up with the packets? I'm using eepro100.c:v1.26 11/17/2002 drivers with my 82557/8/9? Or is it really the kernel which is screwing it up? Michael *** REPLY SEPARATOR *** On 25-03-2003 at 16:19 Michael Madsen wrote: >*** REPLY SEPARATOR *** > >On 25-03-2003 at 09:50 Kevin J. Anderson wrote: > >>I would imagine it has to do w/ overhead due to changes/improvements to >the >>kernel. I think around 2.4.9 they redid the VM and continued tweaking it >>afterwards? >> >So you think I'd be better of with the 2.4.9 or have they fixed something >after 2.4.17, so my 2.4.20 is alright? > >Michael > >___ >To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, >please visit: >http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
RE: [hlds_linux] Servers
*** REPLY SEPARATOR *** On 25-03-2003 at 09:50 Kevin J. Anderson wrote: >I would imagine it has to do w/ overhead due to changes/improvements to the >kernel. I think around 2.4.9 they redid the VM and continued tweaking it >afterwards? > So you think I'd be better of with the 2.4.9 or have they fixed something after 2.4.17, so my 2.4.20 is alright? Michael ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
RE: [hlds_linux] Servers
->-Original Message- ->From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ->[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Oscar N aka ->'Dreadful' ->Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 9:28 AM ->To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ->Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Servers -> -> ->By the way, way is it so??? ->I mean, the problem can not only exist when you run HL. ->Have there been any bug reported about this to the kernel developer??? I would imagine it has to do w/ overhead due to changes/improvements to the kernel. I think around 2.4.9 they redid the VM and continued tweaking it afterwards? kev ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] Servers
By the way, way is it so??? I mean, the problem can not only exist when you run HL. Have there been any bug reported about this to the kernel developer??? /Oscar Matt wrote: Your going to find wierd problems with kernels after 2.4.9 and up to about 2.4.16 or .17. On Tue, 2003-03-25 at 08:43, Oscar N aka 'Dreadful' wrote: Don't know for sure. But try the 2.4.9 and if the same problem exist try latest 2.2.x People have reported wierd stuff with kernels later than 2.4.9, but I don't know if this problem can be related to that... Or you can use Freebsd instead of linux... :) /Oscar Michael Madsen wrote: I am using the latest kernel 2.4.20 on RedHat. Is that a problem? Michael *** REPLY SEPARATOR *** On 25-03-2003 at 14:28 Oscar N aka 'Dreadful' wrote: What kernel are you using? And have you tried 2.4.9 or the latest 2.2.X? /Oscar Michael Madsen wrote: ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux -- Matt http://www.playway.net ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] Servers
Your going to find wierd problems with kernels after 2.4.9 and up to about 2.4.16 or .17. On Tue, 2003-03-25 at 08:43, Oscar N aka 'Dreadful' wrote: > Don't know for sure. But try the 2.4.9 and if the same problem exist try > latest 2.2.x > People have reported wierd stuff with kernels later than 2.4.9, but I > don't know if this problem can be related to that... > Or you can use Freebsd instead of linux... :) > > /Oscar > > Michael Madsen wrote: > > >I am using the latest kernel 2.4.20 on RedHat. > >Is that a problem? > > > >Michael > >*** REPLY SEPARATOR *** > > > >On 25-03-2003 at 14:28 Oscar N aka 'Dreadful' wrote: > > > > > > > >>What kernel are you using? And have you tried 2.4.9 or the latest 2.2.X? > >> > >>/Oscar > >> > >>Michael Madsen wrote: > >> > >> > >> > > > > > >___ > >To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: > >http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > > > > > > > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux -- Matt http://www.playway.net ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] Servers
Don't know for sure. But try the 2.4.9 and if the same problem exist try latest 2.2.x People have reported wierd stuff with kernels later than 2.4.9, but I don't know if this problem can be related to that... Or you can use Freebsd instead of linux... :) /Oscar Michael Madsen wrote: I am using the latest kernel 2.4.20 on RedHat. Is that a problem? Michael *** REPLY SEPARATOR *** On 25-03-2003 at 14:28 Oscar N aka 'Dreadful' wrote: What kernel are you using? And have you tried 2.4.9 or the latest 2.2.X? /Oscar Michael Madsen wrote: ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] Servers
I am using the latest kernel 2.4.20 on RedHat. Is that a problem? Michael *** REPLY SEPARATOR *** On 25-03-2003 at 14:28 Oscar N aka 'Dreadful' wrote: >What kernel are you using? And have you tried 2.4.9 or the latest 2.2.X? > >/Oscar > >Michael Madsen wrote: > ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
Re: [hlds_linux] Servers
What kernel are you using? And have you tried 2.4.9 or the latest 2.2.X? /Oscar Michael Madsen wrote: I'm having the same "problem" myself. Running 2-3 full servers with 90-95% idle, but when I put on another server one or two of the servers suddenly uses 30-40% CPU. That's totally strange and I can't figure out why. Running on P4 2.4 with 1GB ram. How the h*ll can one server change the load that much, I don't get it. Michael *** REPLY SEPARATOR *** On 25-03-2003 at 10:07 Drew Broadley wrote: Was just thinking that myself.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Tyler "Overkill" Schwend Sent: Tuesday, 25 March 2003 10:02 a.m. To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] Servers How the hell? 90+% idle? with 3 full servers? HOW?! - Tyler "[TASF]Overkill" Schwend "Semper facere bonum, an a amare odium, vita mors." --- Server operator of [LCGA]Telefragged: Counter-Strike: telefragged.lynchburg.edu:27015 http://schwend-t.web.lynchburg.edu ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux ___ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
